680:
620:
586:
533:
509:
487:
465:
428:
401:
371:
349:
235:
213:
42:
276:
The Harry Potter films are mentioned as "His greatest commercial successes", but I see no sourcing for this either, and there's problems with this opinion as well, since what does "greatest commercial successes" mean, really? It's unclear and could be reworded. The lead should not contain statements
273:
In the first sentence of the lead, the claim is made that
Columbus is "best known for his family and sentimental films", the "family" part of it is not in the body at all, and the "sentimental" part of it is sourced to two articles with the briefest of mentions of "sentimentality". It seems to me
639:
The picture of
Columbus at Comic Con 2012 could be cropped to just include the two on the right. #1, you'd actually be able to see him , and #2 the emcee isn't relevant, but Ned Vizzini is, and could be briefly ID'd in the caption as his co-author on the House of Secrets book series.
279:
The lead mentions 15 of the 21 total films he's been involved in - see "Editors should avoid lengthy paragraphs and overly specific descriptions – greater detail is saved for the body of the article" in
643:
I've cropped the image on this article using some CSS (which is easier, hope that's okay). Vizzini as co-author is mentioned in the body already, but happy to add it to the caption if it's clearer.
47:
391:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
388:
126:
222:
177:
260:
80:
122:
70:
107:
52:
603:
99:
264:
256:
248:
295:
Thank you for reviewing this article. I agree there were some issues with wording. I've tightened the lead up a bit, so hopefully it's better now!
270:
In the lead, the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph needs work, as it's a bit confusing and needs a grammar tweak; the two problems are related.
633:
167:
252:
519:
173:
75:
437:
410:
156:
595:
115:
17:
607:
380:
274:
that that is too trivial to be mentioned in the first sentence of a lead, given the weak sourcing. It's fine in the body.
384:
244:
92:
599:
496:
416:
The aforementioned lead contains what could be construed as grey-area original research; already explained above.
334:
546:
474:
441:
703:
663:
315:
150:
572:
568:
228:
No problems with conciseness or spelling. Some minor issues in the lead with grammar and clarity.
629:
576:
357:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
358:
190:
707:
667:
649:
319:
301:
160:
699:
659:
311:
290:
146:
523:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
644:
296:
281:
495:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
545:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
698:
Update: with minor fixes implemented, I believe all criteria are met.
695:
It's very close; a few fixes to the minor problems should do it.
394:
All information is referenced to verifiable, reliable sources.
419:
Update: lead was adjusted and contains no original research.
447:
I used the Earwig tool and found no copyright violations.
134:
103:
310:Yes, the new lead meets all criteria, well done.
223:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
8:
30:
284:. It could be tightened up quite a bit.
183:
61:
33:
552:No edit wars going on that I can see.
7:
225:; spelling and grammar are correct.
658:Vast improvement, well done again.
221:. the prose is clear, concise, and
24:
678:
618:
584:
531:
507:
485:
463:
426:
399:
369:
347:
233:
211:
176:for what the criteria are, and
18:Talk:Chris Columbus (filmmaker)
389:could reasonably be challenged
1:
604:valid non-free use rationales
679:
619:
585:
532:
508:
486:
464:
427:
400:
370:
364:List of references is good.
348:
234:
212:
728:
359:the layout style guideline
556:
451:
329:
199:
189:
708:07:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
668:07:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
650:17:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
320:07:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
302:17:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
186:
161:21:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
632:to the topic, and have
243:. it complies with the
180:for what they are not)
613:This all looks good.
456:Broad in its coverage
549:or content dispute.
438:copyright violations
411:no original research
340:no original research
473:. it addresses the
387:. All content that
690:Overall assessment
600:copyright statuses
563:, if possible, by
265:list incorporation
715:
714:
634:suitable captions
606:are provided for
436:. it contains no
89:
88:
719:
682:
681:
622:
621:
608:non-free content
588:
587:
535:
534:
511:
510:
489:
488:
467:
466:
430:
429:
403:
402:
381:reliable sources
373:
372:
351:
350:
294:
237:
236:
215:
214:
184:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
727:
726:
722:
721:
720:
718:
717:
716:
288:
277:this ambiguous.
247:guidelines for
245:Manual of Style
195:Review Comment
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
725:
723:
713:
712:
711:
710:
693:
683:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
653:
652:
637:
623:
615:
614:
611:
589:
581:
580:
554:
553:
550:
536:
528:
527:
524:
512:
504:
503:
500:
490:
482:
481:
478:
477:of the topic.
468:
460:
459:
449:
448:
445:
431:
423:
422:
421:
420:
414:
409:. it contains
404:
396:
395:
392:
374:
366:
365:
362:
352:
344:
343:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
305:
304:
278:
275:
271:
268:
257:words to watch
238:
230:
229:
226:
216:
208:
207:
197:
196:
193:
188:
182:
181:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
724:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:
694:
691:
687:
684:
677:
676:
669:
665:
661:
657:
656:
655:
654:
651:
648:
647:
642:
641:
638:
635:
631:
627:
624:
617:
616:
612:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
559:
555:
551:
548:
544:
540:
537:
530:
529:
525:
522:
521:
516:
513:
506:
505:
501:
498:
497:summary style
494:
491:
484:
483:
479:
476:
472:
469:
462:
461:
457:
454:
450:
446:
443:
439:
435:
432:
425:
424:
418:
417:
415:
412:
408:
405:
398:
397:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
368:
367:
363:
360:
356:
353:
346:
345:
341:
337:
336:
332:
328:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
300:
299:
292:
287:
286:
285:
283:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:lead sections
246:
242:
239:
232:
231:
227:
224:
220:
217:
210:
209:
205:
202:
198:
194:
192:
185:
179:
175:
171:
169:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
689:
685:
645:
628:. media are
625:
594:. media are
591:
564:
560:
557:
542:
538:
518:
514:
492:
475:main aspects
470:
455:
452:
433:
406:
385:cited inline
376:
354:
339:
333:
330:
297:
272:
240:
218:
204:Well-written
203:
200:
166:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
598:with their
561:Illustrated
104:visual edit
700:JimKaatFan
660:JimKaatFan
442:plagiarism
335:Verifiable
312:JimKaatFan
291:JimKaatFan
147:JimKaatFan
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
282:MOS:INTRO
191:Attribute
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
630:relevant
567:such as
547:edit war
157:contribs
76:Criteria
520:Neutral
261:fiction
127:history
108:history
94:Article
602:, and
596:tagged
569:images
543:Stable
526:Good.
502:Good.
480:Good.
263:, and
253:layout
170:review
577:audio
575:, or
573:video
565:media
338:with
187:Rate
172:(see
136:Watch
16:<
704:talk
664:talk
646:L150
383:are
316:talk
298:L150
178:here
174:here
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
499:).
440:or
706:)
692:.
688:.
666:)
636:.
626:6b
610:.
592:6a
579::
571:,
558:6.
541:.
517:.
493:3b
471:3a
458::
453:3.
444:.
434:2d
413:.
407:2c
379:.
377:2b
361:.
355:2a
342::
331:2.
318:)
267:.
259:,
255:,
251:,
241:1b
219:1a
206::
201:1.
168:GA
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
702:(
686:7
662:(
539:5
515:4
314:(
293::
289:@
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.