Knowledge

Talk:Cindy Hyde-Smith

Source đź“ť

1478:, in existence since 2002 and also not mentioned at RSP. The JFP has been around longer, and is the source of a greater number of references in the encyclopedia. It seems pretty solid to me. If their veracity is doubted, wouldn't it be better to discuss it at RSP then make a decision in an article talk page? I'm personally not convinced the word "falsely" should be included, but isn't it wrong to dismiss this source as unreliable without any reason other than it has not been discussed at RSP? In fact, isn't that the opposite of how RSP states it is supposed to work? It feels to me that calling the source unreliable without any evidence is sidetracking the discussion of whether the word "falsely" should be included. Shouldn't the discussion be about whether the statement is in fact true or false? 967: 949: 719: 698: 547: 520: 1442:, that "A source's absence from the list does not imply that it is any more or less reliable than the sources that are present. Absence just means its reliability has not been the subject of serious questioning yet." Since Mississippi Free Press is frequently quoted in the encyclopedia and has not been discussed at RSP, wouldn't that make it likely that it's reliability has not been challenged because it is in fact a highly reliable, perhaps even a stellar source? 917: 729: 557: 1048: 650: 841: 814: 488: 662: 851: 261: 426: 402: 1038: 1017: 1377: 297: 352: 328: 436: 1153:
Additionally the use of the term falsely is an opinion, as nobody has a crystal ball. Furthermore the article used to say the claim is false contains a misleading headline. The article also says “Mississippi Already Meets Most Requirements” keyword most, and “Those changes would have little impact on
1223:
the CNN article makes no mention of Mississippi’s voter ID law. Secondly she didn’t say the bill would nullify ALL of Mississippi’s VID laws. and even by the article’s own admission, the bill would have an impact and an effect on some of those laws. If you can find a source that says the FTPA would
1492:
Our opinions about what is truth are kind or irrelevant. What do reliable sources say? If we are going to use the wiki voice to call something false the source needs to be excellent. I'm not sure this source is unreliable, but I'm not sure it's reliable either. However, if this is going to be
1126:
Please do not re-add the word falsely to this article in regards to her claims about a Bill proposed at the federal level. I believe that whether or not Her claim is true, would have been decided by a court, if anyone disagrees feel free to reply with the reason. thanks
1192:
Mississippi voters can already vote by sworn affidavit if they do not have a photo ID on Election Day, and their ballot will count so long as they present an accepted form of ID to their circuit clerk’s office within five business
1403:. I checked the noticeboard as well and couldn't find anything. Given this claim is in dispute it needs to be backed by some reliable sources. The CNN article doesn't mention Hyde-Smith or Mississippi so that would require 153: 1590: 502: 1460:, I err on the side of "find more sourcing" if a question of inclusion is contentious. If this article is going to say in a wiki voice a person "falsely" said something the sourcing needs to be rock solid. 1585: 1615: 497: 412: 587: 1570: 1595: 241: 1670: 931: 604: 147: 271:
who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy.
1261:
Under S.1, in a federal election, an individual could walk into a polling place, register and vote on the spot, without ever showing any proof of identity or residency
926: 824: 1176: 1511: 1252:
The version that contains "falsely" predates the content dispute. Making a change and then requiring consensus that it be kept is putting the cart before the horse.
1675: 1645: 1610: 785: 775: 640: 630: 1493:
included it should be well sourced. So the easiest answer is find better sourcing, but you are right... there's other reasons to not include. Does this pass the
1705: 1104: 1094: 358: 338: 1690: 1625: 1560: 680: 246: 1259:. Even granting your point about the words "little" and "most": if a claim is 90% false, that doesn't make it not-false. The scenario Hyde-Smith described ( 1685: 1665: 1635: 1575: 594: 229:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1710: 1650: 1497:, did this receive enough coverage to justify inclusion? If this is notable part of this person's biography it should be easy to find some more sources. 79: 1255:
The substance of Hyde-Smith's claim is false. The bar you've set relies on an overly-strict interpretation of both Hyde-Smith's words and those of the
1660: 1630: 907: 897: 751: 599: 44: 1224:
have ZERO impact on mississippis VID laws then ill drop my objections. To say the claim was completely false is clearly not the right thing to do
1640: 1605: 1600: 1203:
The bill would not prohibit states from having voter identification laws and would not prohibit states from checking the IDs of in-person voters​.
1070: 454: 221: 1700: 1680: 1620: 1263:) isn't possible because both the FTPA and Mississippi's existing law consider a sworn affidavit sufficient proof of identity and residency. 85: 1309:
Which laws? Where does it say that? Please be specific. Include direct quotes from the source where possible; there are examples upthread.
1238:
Additionally, why would you readd the term falsely despite my talk page request that it not be readded until a consensus could be reached
458: 1695: 1580: 1531: 1346: 1314: 1286: 1268: 1214: 873: 742: 703: 570: 525: 1655: 1061: 1022: 582: 462: 363: 333: 1198: 1142: 675: 530: 453:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1278: 983: 449: 407: 274: 190: 168: 99: 30: 1527: 1342: 1310: 1282: 1264: 1210: 864: 819: 135: 104: 20: 578:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74: 1514:
briefly mentions the voter ID claim in the last paragraph, but is mostly about a different claim of hers (which is also
308: 1295:
but the article still says that a few(very few) law’s would no longer be in effect, so the word falsely in inaccurate
1565: 974: 954: 368: 65: 185: 129: 199: 125: 1382: 1323:
the article didn’t specify, but the fact that the law would be modified means some parts must be nullified
230: 109: 966: 948: 747: 1328: 1300: 1243: 1229: 1159: 1138: 314: 175: 718: 697: 1439: 1130: 734: 562: 240:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 296: 1053: 282: 161: 55: 1069:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
982:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
872:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
750:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1456:
It's only existed since 2020, so that could explain why it hasn't be questioned. Since this is a
667: 278: 244:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 204: 70: 546: 519: 141: 51: 1483: 1447: 1324: 1296: 1239: 1225: 1172:
court case to determine the factuality of Hyde-Smith's claim is itself crystal-ball-looking.
1155: 1134: 441: 201: 24: 916: 1502: 1465: 1416: 1404: 856: 237: 1494: 1411:. I would support removing the claim for now until better sources are found. Thanks! 850: 840: 813: 487: 1554: 1457: 1435: 1392: 575: 1438:, which you quote above, I draw a different conclusion. RSP specifically states at 1408: 1400: 1338: 1066: 649: 260: 1479: 1443: 425: 401: 1498: 1461: 1412: 1043: 1037: 1016: 846: 724: 657: 552: 431: 268: 203: 574:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 1535: 1506: 1487: 1469: 1451: 1420: 1350: 1332: 1318: 1304: 1290: 1272: 1247: 1233: 1218: 1163: 1146: 869: 351: 327: 461:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1182:, you might be missing the forest for the trees. Hyde-Smith said: 979: 1391:
This discussion essentially boils down to sourcing. I reviewed
290: 255: 236:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
213: 205: 15: 915: 648: 486: 1591:
Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
367:
project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please
1190:(emphasis mine). Which wasn't borne out by the evidence: 746:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1515: 1154:
Mississippi’s voter ID law” (little doesn’t mean none)
273:
For that reason, this article is at increased risk of
160: 1586:
B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
1065:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 978:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 868:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 371:
regarding their contributions before making changes.
357:This article was created or improved during the 1616:B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1337:Now we're just going in circles. I will seek a 174: 8: 1571:WikiProject Women in Red meetup 184 articles 1596:Politics and government work group articles 1128: 1011: 943: 808: 692: 514: 396: 322: 1671:Mid-importance American politics articles 1013: 945: 810: 694: 516: 398: 324: 294: 1522:is the only one I found that explains 1260: 1205:Shall that be used in addition to the 1202: 1191: 1183: 498:the politics and government work group 1676:American politics task force articles 1646:Low-importance U.S. Congress articles 1611:Mid-importance United States articles 1188:Mississippi’s successful voter ID law 7: 1706:Low-importance Conservatism articles 1059:This article is within the scope of 972:This article is within the scope of 862:This article is within the scope of 795:This article is about one (or many) 740:This article is within the scope of 568:This article is within the scope of 447:This article is within the scope of 1691:All WikiProject Women-related pages 1626:Mid-importance Mississippi articles 1561:Biography articles of living people 1277:As a compromise measure I've added 760:Knowledge:WikiProject U.S. Congress 615:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 313:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1686:B-Class WikiProject Women articles 1666:B-Class American politics articles 1636:WikiProject United States articles 1576:All WikiProject Women in Red pages 1281:next to the sentence in question. 1079:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism 763:Template:WikiProject U.S. Congress 618:Template:WikiProject United States 377:Knowledge:WikiProject Women in Red 14: 1711:WikiProject Conservatism articles 1651:WikiProject U.S. Congress persons 1082:Template:WikiProject Conservatism 380:Template:WikiProject Women in Red 1661:Low-importance politics articles 1631:WikiProject Mississippi articles 1474:It is a direct successor to the 1375: 1279:Template:Under discussion inline 1046: 1036: 1015: 965: 947: 849: 839: 812: 727: 717: 696: 660: 555: 545: 518: 434: 424: 400: 350: 326: 295: 259: 219:This article must adhere to the 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1099:This article has been rated as 902:This article has been rated as 780:This article has been rated as 635:This article has been rated as 471:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 1641:B-Class U.S. Congress articles 1606:B-Class United States articles 1601:WikiProject Biography articles 882:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 474:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1701:B-Class Conservatism articles 1681:WikiProject Politics articles 1526:the voter ID claim is false. 1073:and see a list of open tasks. 986:and see a list of open tasks. 924:This article is supported by 885:Template:WikiProject Politics 876:and see a list of open tasks. 754:and see a list of open tasks. 673:This article is supported by 495:This article is supported by 222:biographies of living persons 42:Put new text under old text. 1621:B-Class Mississippi articles 927:American politics task force 459:contribute to the discussion 992:Knowledge:WikiProject Women 234:must be removed immediately 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1727: 1696:WikiProject Women articles 1581:B-Class biography articles 1536:06:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 1507:15:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 1488:15:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 1470:15:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 1452:15:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 1421:13:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 1351:00:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 1333:20:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC) 1319:16:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC) 1305:12:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC) 1291:19:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 1273:19:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 1248:14:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 1234:14:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 1219:02:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 1175:As for the wording in the 1168:Relying on an unspecified 1105:project's importance scale 998:WikiProject Women articles 995:Template:WikiProject Women 908:project's importance scale 786:project's importance scale 641:project's importance scale 1656:B-Class politics articles 1528:Ursus arctos californicus 1343:Ursus arctos californicus 1311:Ursus arctos californicus 1283:Ursus arctos californicus 1265:Ursus arctos californicus 1211:Ursus arctos californicus 1164:15:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC) 1147:02:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC) 1098: 1031: 960: 923: 901: 834: 794: 779: 743:WikiProject U.S. Congress 712: 656: 634: 571:WikiProject United States 540: 494: 419: 345: 321: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1201:that refutes the claim: 1062:WikiProject Conservatism 576:United States of America 676:WikiProject Mississippi 413:Politics and Government 1397:Mississippi Free Press 1178:Mississippi Free Press 920: 766:U.S. Congress articles 748:United States Congress 653: 621:United States articles 491: 359:#1day1woman initiative 303:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1383:third opinion request 1085:Conservatism articles 919: 652: 490: 450:WikiProject Biography 383:Women in Red articles 267:This page is about a 100:Neutral point of view 865:WikiProject Politics 735:United States portal 563:United States portal 105:No original research 1407:which is a form of 1054:Conservatism portal 589:Articles Requested! 277:editing, talk-page 1566:Active politicians 1476:Jackson Free Press 921: 668:Mississippi portal 654: 492: 477:biography articles 339:#1day1woman (2021) 309:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1426: 1425: 1199:additional source 1149: 1133:comment added by 1119: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1005: 975:WikiProject Women 942: 941: 938: 937: 888:politics articles 807: 806: 803: 802: 691: 690: 687: 686: 513: 512: 509: 508: 395: 394: 391: 390: 369:assume good faith 289: 288: 254: 253: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1718: 1399:was listed as a 1379: 1378: 1372: 1371: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1040: 1033: 1032: 1027: 1019: 1012: 1000: 999: 996: 993: 990: 969: 962: 961: 951: 944: 890: 889: 886: 883: 880: 859: 854: 853: 843: 836: 835: 830: 827: 816: 809: 768: 767: 764: 761: 758: 737: 732: 731: 730: 721: 714: 713: 708: 700: 693: 670: 665: 664: 663: 623: 622: 619: 616: 613: 565: 560: 559: 558: 549: 542: 541: 536: 533: 522: 515: 479: 478: 475: 472: 469: 455:join the project 444: 442:Biography portal 439: 438: 437: 428: 421: 420: 415: 404: 397: 385: 384: 381: 378: 375: 354: 347: 346: 341: 330: 323: 306: 300: 299: 291: 263: 256: 242:this noticeboard 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 25:Cindy Hyde-Smith 16: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1551: 1550: 1512:This AP article 1401:reliable source 1376: 1124: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1052: 1047: 1045: 1025: 997: 994: 991: 988: 987: 887: 884: 881: 878: 877: 857:Politics portal 855: 848: 828: 822: 765: 762: 759: 756: 755: 733: 728: 726: 706: 666: 661: 659: 620: 617: 614: 611: 610: 609: 595:Become a Member 561: 556: 554: 534: 528: 476: 473: 470: 467: 466: 440: 435: 433: 410: 382: 379: 376: 373: 372: 336: 307:on Knowledge's 304: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1724: 1722: 1714: 1713: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1688: 1683: 1678: 1673: 1668: 1663: 1658: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1623: 1618: 1613: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1553: 1552: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1434:: When I read 1424: 1423: 1395:to see if the 1388: 1387: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1275: 1253: 1195: 1173: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1101:Low-importance 1097: 1091: 1090: 1088: 1071:the discussion 1058: 1057: 1041: 1029: 1028: 1026:Low‑importance 1020: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1003: 1001: 984:the discussion 970: 958: 957: 952: 940: 939: 936: 935: 932:Mid-importance 922: 912: 911: 904:Low-importance 900: 894: 893: 891: 874:the discussion 861: 860: 844: 832: 831: 829:Low‑importance 817: 805: 804: 801: 800: 793: 790: 789: 782:Low-importance 778: 772: 771: 769: 752:the discussion 739: 738: 722: 710: 709: 707:Low‑importance 701: 689: 688: 685: 684: 681:Mid-importance 672: 671: 655: 645: 644: 637:Mid-importance 633: 627: 626: 624: 608: 607: 602: 597: 592: 585: 583:Template Usage 579: 567: 566: 550: 538: 537: 535:Mid‑importance 523: 511: 510: 507: 506: 503:Low-importance 493: 483: 482: 480: 446: 445: 429: 417: 416: 405: 393: 392: 389: 388: 386: 361:hosted by the 355: 343: 342: 331: 319: 318: 312: 301: 287: 286: 264: 252: 251: 247:this help page 231:poorly sourced 217: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1723: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1704: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1692: 1689: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1674: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1662: 1659: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1614: 1612: 1609: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1556: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1495:ten year test 1491: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440:WP:RSPMISSING 1437: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1374: 1373: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339:third opinion 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1194: 1189: 1187: 1181: 1179: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1121: 1106: 1102: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1055: 1044: 1042: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1002: 985: 981: 977: 976: 971: 968: 964: 963: 959: 956: 953: 950: 946: 933: 930:(assessed as 929: 928: 918: 914: 913: 909: 905: 899: 896: 895: 892: 875: 871: 867: 866: 858: 852: 847: 845: 842: 838: 837: 833: 826: 821: 818: 815: 811: 798: 792: 791: 787: 783: 777: 774: 773: 770: 757:U.S. Congress 753: 749: 745: 744: 736: 725: 723: 720: 716: 715: 711: 705: 704:U.S. Congress 702: 699: 695: 682: 679:(assessed as 678: 677: 669: 658: 651: 647: 646: 642: 638: 632: 629: 628: 625: 612:United States 606: 603: 601: 598: 596: 593: 591: 590: 586: 584: 581: 580: 577: 573: 572: 564: 553: 551: 548: 544: 543: 539: 532: 527: 526:United States 524: 521: 517: 504: 501:(assessed as 500: 499: 489: 485: 484: 481: 464: 463:documentation 460: 456: 452: 451: 443: 432: 430: 427: 423: 422: 418: 414: 409: 406: 403: 399: 387: 370: 366: 365: 360: 356: 353: 349: 348: 344: 340: 335: 332: 329: 325: 320: 316: 310: 302: 298: 293: 292: 284: 281:, and simple 280: 276: 272: 270: 265: 262: 258: 257: 249: 248: 243: 239: 235: 232: 228: 224: 223: 218: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1523: 1519: 1475: 1431: 1396: 1381:Response to 1380: 1256: 1206: 1185: 1177: 1169: 1129:— Preceding 1125: 1100: 1076:Conservatism 1067:conservatism 1060: 1023:Conservatism 973: 925: 903: 863: 796: 781: 741: 674: 636: 600:Project Talk 588: 569: 496: 448: 374:Women in Red 364:Women in Red 362: 334:Women in Red 315:WikiProjects 266: 245: 233: 226: 220: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1325:Cannolorosa 1297:Cannolorosa 1240:Cannolorosa 1226:Cannolorosa 1197:I found an 1156:Cannolorosa 1135:Cannolorosa 531:Mississippi 148:free images 31:not a forum 1555:Categories 1257:Free Press 1207:Free Press 269:politician 1122:“falsely” 797:person(s) 468:Biography 408:Biography 283:vandalism 238:libellous 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1432:Question 1405:WP:SYNTH 1143:contribs 1131:unsigned 879:Politics 870:politics 825:American 820:Politics 279:trolling 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1518:). The 1516:covered 1186:nullify 1180:article 1103:on the 906:on the 784:on the 639:on the 305:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1480:Jacona 1458:WP:BLP 1444:Jacona 1436:WP:RSP 1393:WP:RSP 1184:would 1170:future 605:Alerts 311:scale. 275:biased 126:Google 1499:Nemov 1462:Nemov 1413:Nemov 1409:WP:OR 1193:days. 989:Women 980:women 955:Women 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1532:talk 1503:talk 1484:talk 1466:talk 1448:talk 1417:talk 1347:talk 1329:talk 1315:talk 1301:talk 1287:talk 1269:talk 1244:talk 1230:talk 1215:talk 1160:talk 1139:talk 457:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1524:why 1520:MFP 1095:Low 898:Low 776:Low 631:Mid 227:BLP 176:TWL 1557:: 1534:) 1505:) 1486:) 1468:) 1450:) 1419:) 1349:) 1341:. 1331:) 1317:) 1303:) 1289:) 1271:) 1246:) 1232:) 1217:) 1209:? 1162:) 1145:) 1141:• 934:). 823:: 683:). 529:: 505:). 411:: 337:: 156:) 54:; 1530:( 1501:( 1482:( 1464:( 1446:( 1415:( 1385:: 1345:( 1327:( 1313:( 1299:( 1285:( 1267:( 1242:( 1228:( 1213:( 1158:( 1137:( 1107:. 910:. 799:. 788:. 643:. 465:. 317:: 285:. 250:. 225:( 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Cindy Hyde-Smith
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
biographies of living persons
poorly sourced
libellous
this noticeboard
this help page

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑