558:
or legalities involved, which are obviously interesting in and of themselves. The only section that deals with these subjects is
History, and it consists of 8 sentences. It may be appropriate to edit that section if there is an inaccuracy, or it is not complete. If you would like to add a section dealing with the controversy surrounding the weapon it may be useful to add a section called "Controversy" and putting the comments under that. Certainly a discussion of the controversy surrounding the weapon does not belong at the top of the page, subverting the rest of the content, and if there is to be mention of it at all the author should present arguments in a clear, logical, non-personal fashion.
654:
explodes outside of the chamber, thereby may tear your fingers off, takes one of your eye out, or two of your eye or all of the above. Also the "invention" by their machinist (six pack Joe K.) to hold the bolt back, that will release the bolt by inserting the magazine and as the bolt moves forward, thereby loads the carthridge and will fire it as the bolt will cary the firing pin with and 'as open bolt fixed firing pin bolt' with the bullet will fly in any direction... maybe a person dead... A a later date I may post some more...
424:
403:
622:
they could not reproduce them and the product they produced is an "UNSAFE GUN" that can fire by loading it, unsafe to fire it as the inproper magazine that will load the carthridge sideways, hitting the primer and the carthridge explodes and you could vind up without some fingers, or without an eye or both. I am cautioning everybody, who have one of the
Claridge gun to use it with "EXTREME CAUTION" and for your and others safety make it inoperatable or destroy it...
282:
434:
266:
705:
50:
151:
331:
310:
223:
212:
201:
21:
109:
81:
190:
179:
565:
Further violation of the NPOV standards would be considered vandalism, and would be reported as such. It would be much better to edit the article in a scholarly manner and present any additional technical details where they belong, separating physics and science from the politics and social aspects.
557:
Much of this material would be useful if presented in a non-biased format. Please consider removing the personal attacks, condensing the material to specific facts, and citing sources where applicable. This article primarily focuses on the design and operation of the gun, not the producers, politics,
588:
To get the cash-flow going it was introduced as a semi-auto gun / That was the ATF classification for the gun./ After completion of the production toolings, there was limited production with alluminum frames, that was not strong enough, was switched over to 17-4 Stainless and mass production started
653:
I highly recomend anybody has that "Claridge garbage" to discard, make it inoperable or destroy it for his / her and others safety... Because the magazine is an aftermarket double row, single feed that will 'stow-pipe' the carthridge and the edge of the bolt will crush the primer and the carthridge
577:
CORRECTIONS / BIG TIME!!!!!! My name is Goncz and I am the inventor and the manufacturer of the Goncz Hi-Tech
Weapons. I have do not know who did the previous posting? I must assume that he / she must be high on something or plain ignorant or stupid and believes that the posted missinformation will
621:
The facts are that the
Claridges came in as investors and bought out 30Â % interest in Goncz Arms, Inc. Claridge Hi-Tech, Inc. was never authorized to produce the Weapons or use of the intellectual property. They stole the Intellectual property and tried to produce them. Fortunately / Unfortunately
617:
and write up more than 100 pages and in the films Total Recall, Assasins, Planet of the Apes, Soul 007, Action
Jackson, Accapulco Heat and many more. In the GUNS & AMMO authored by Garry James, who in other magazine "GUNS & AMMO" later described the Goncz Hi-Tech GS-9 as a Claridge Hi-Tech
610:
Goncz Hi-Tech, Carbines GC-9mm., GC-.45. (Featured on front cover of the "ASAULT WEAPON", The guns were full in production before
Claridges / Gail Claridge interior decorator, Joe Claridge, retired motorcyle cup and their son Joe a construction worker came into picture as investores that purchased
643:
What "a lie" The
Claridges are trying again. The Claridge Hi-Tech, Inc. had never had the rights to produce the Goncz Hi-Tech firearms. Upon they started to produce them I initiated a Law suit in US Federal Disctrict Court in Los Angeles and I was represented by Dean Webb, Esq. from Oregoen (best
561:
There may be an argument for the separation of the
Claridge entry from the entry on the Goncz. Certainly there are differences. However, this argument was not made, and it would be difficult to believe the two could not stay on the same page so long as the differences were clearly and accurately
273:
91:
584:
I designed the Goncz
Weapons Systems. Initially was the intention to design and produce a compact reliable pistol, that is light and to fire a single, burst or full auto gun which would incorporate / replace side arms and sub-machine gun into a single entity.
754:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
618:
with pictures and text and stated and claimed, that he never saw any gun like this and Gail
Claridge , (inerior decorator and Joe Claridge, retired motorcycle cap) invented it. (Taht guy must have been high on something or has a verry short memmory...)
540:
On November 11, 2006 the inventor of the Goncz Hi-Tech Pistol posted the material cited below. It is neither scholarly nor objective, and, therefore, the page was reverted to the previous version. Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s
644:
Attorney I ever had.) and we sued them individually and collectively: Joe Claridge, Gail Claridge, their attorney Brown, Accountant and some Distributors under RICO, Lahnaman Act. and other claims in front of Federal Judge.
793:
630:
The magazine originally my design and production is a 'double row / doulbe feed'. They could not produce the magazine, therefore bought cheap junk 'after-market' magazines that were produced in a garage by hobbyiest.
798:
625:
The Goncz Weapons are safe: You can fire any carthridge, hot load, super load, subsonic load, full Metal Jacket, Soft point, hollow points etc. and you will be safe. Make sure you have the original magazine.
31:
838:
289:
95:
634:
The receiver that I was producing was made out of solid chrome alloy 4130 and heat threated. The claridge is a tubing that has the plug in and than silver soldered, that with the time pops out.
751:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
578:
be not challenged, or just a hired PR for a pocket change. The posted material is full of lies and missinformation. I feel that I have the obligation to inform the public about the facts...
464:
481:
164:
121:
666:
The Punisher used this in the first several issues of War Journal. He seemed to really like it and lamented when Daredevil returned it in 'less than mint condition'.
650:
THE CLARIDGE GUNS ARE UNSAFE AND ANY BODY GOT INJURED BY USING THE, THEY SHOULD SUE THEM, AS THEY KNOW, THAT THE GUNS ARE AND WERE "UNSAFE" BUT THEY STILL SOLD THEM...
517:
150:
833:
788:
507:
471:
385:
843:
828:
611:
out the previous shareholders that represented about 30% interest in the Company. The Goncz Weapons prior 1990 were on the front cover of many magazines:
476:
732:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
729:
818:
375:
756:
748:
744:
721:
116:
86:
647:
We won the rounds. Itis open anybody can see it. The reason they were forced to stop the production becouse we were wining the case. The facts are:
351:
823:
813:
803:
760:
447:
408:
347:
808:
125:
459:
338:
315:
669:
Dunno if that's worth noting or not. Also, not sure what model of the Goncz it would have been. This was back in 88 I believe.
455:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
61:
581:(I have an idea who did the posting and he is either drunk or high on cocain again... or is doing it for 'pocket change)
27:
740:
712:
770:
67:
49:
346:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
120:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
672:
717:
439:
716:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
20:
766:
688:
684:
614:
GUN WORLD, AMERICAN HANDGUNNER, AMERICAN SURVIVALIST, ASSAULT FIREARMS, HANDGUN ILLUSTRATED, Etc.
640:
and if you are looking for another hi - tech products at www.goncz.net Cordially, John Goncz PS.
423:
402:
658:(Beneeth is the previous posting by some uninformed, or bought PR or just a plain "scumbag")
281:
774:
691:
675:
733:
542:
704:
782:
601:(Featured on front cover of Gun World) Goncz Hi-Tech, Long Pistol GA-9mm. GA-45 ACP.
452:
683:
Shouldn't all this pop culture be trimmed back and better integrated or removed per
638:
265:
429:
330:
309:
451:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
343:
589:
and over 100's were produced completed and 1000's in the production.
108:
80:
728:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
573:
Material Posted in Violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s NPOV Standard
43:
15:
794:
Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
799:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
703:
280:
264:
149:
839:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
700:
Fair use rationale for Image:Arnold Total Recall.jpg
342:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
162:
This article has been checked against the following
759:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
274:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
247:
161:
8:
749:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
134:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
47:
397:
304:
244:
158:
75:
492:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
637:Anybody wants further info, contact me:
114:This article is within the scope of the
399:
306:
77:
124:. To use this banner, please see the
834:Low-importance United States articles
789:Start-Class military history articles
137:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
445:This article is within the scope of
360:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Firearms
336:This article is within the scope of
595:Goncz Hi-Tech, Short gun, GS-9 mm.
66:It is of interest to the following
30:on 18 November 2007. The result of
844:WikiProject United States articles
829:Start-Class United States articles
495:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
819:Low-importance Firearms articles
747:. Using one of the templates at
432:
422:
401:
329:
308:
221:
210:
199:
188:
177:
107:
79:
48:
19:
512:This article has been rated as
380:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
761:Media copyright questions page
692:00:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
824:WikiProject Firearms articles
814:Start-Class Firearms articles
804:Start-Class weaponry articles
730:boilerplate fair use template
713:Image:Arnold Total Recall.jpg
572:
553:Comments on Reverted Material
363:Template:WikiProject Firearms
809:Weaponry task force articles
757:criteria for speedy deletion
543:Neutral Point of View (NPOV)
117:Military history WikiProject
775:07:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
607:(Featured in Shotgun News)
598:GS-.45 ACP., GS-.38 Super.
860:
741:the image description page
518:project's importance scale
386:project's importance scale
182:Referencing and citation:
743:and edit it to include a
676:20:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
511:
448:WikiProject United States
417:
379:
324:
288:
272:
243:
140:military history articles
102:
74:
722:explanation or rationale
453:United States of America
535:Revert uncited material
248:Associated task forces:
193:Coverage and accuracy:
708:
498:United States articles
285:
269:
226:Supporting materials:
154:
56:This article is rated
724:as to why its use in
707:
284:
268:
153:
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
440:United States portal
339:WikiProject Firearms
466:Articles Requested!
290:Weaponry task force
215:Grammar and style:
168:for B-class status:
745:fair use rationale
709:
350:and see a list of
286:
270:
155:
122:list of open tasks
62:content assessment
592:The models were:
532:
531:
528:
527:
524:
523:
396:
395:
392:
391:
366:Firearms articles
303:
302:
299:
298:
295:
294:
239:
238:
195:criterion not met
184:criterion not met
126:full instructions
42:
41:
851:
720:but there is no
673:TotalTommyTerror
500:
499:
496:
493:
490:
442:
437:
436:
435:
426:
419:
418:
413:
405:
398:
368:
367:
364:
361:
358:
333:
326:
325:
320:
312:
305:
255:
245:
229:
225:
224:
218:
214:
213:
207:
203:
202:
196:
192:
191:
185:
181:
180:
159:
142:
141:
138:
135:
132:
131:Military history
111:
104:
103:
98:
87:Military history
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
859:
858:
854:
853:
852:
850:
849:
848:
779:
778:
702:
664:
605:
599:
575:
555:
537:
497:
494:
491:
488:
487:
486:
472:Become a Member
438:
433:
431:
411:
365:
362:
359:
356:
355:
318:
253:
227:
222:
216:
211:
205:
200:
194:
189:
183:
178:
139:
136:
133:
130:
129:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
857:
855:
847:
846:
841:
836:
831:
826:
821:
816:
811:
806:
801:
796:
791:
781:
780:
767:BetacommandBot
701:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
663:
660:
657:
629:
604:GA-.38 Super.
603:
597:
574:
571:
569:
554:
551:
549:
536:
533:
530:
529:
526:
525:
522:
521:
514:Low-importance
510:
504:
503:
501:
485:
484:
479:
474:
469:
462:
460:Template Usage
456:
444:
443:
427:
415:
414:
412:Low‑importance
406:
394:
393:
390:
389:
382:Low-importance
378:
372:
371:
369:
334:
322:
321:
319:Low‑importance
313:
301:
300:
297:
296:
293:
292:
287:
277:
276:
271:
261:
260:
258:
256:
250:
249:
241:
240:
237:
236:
234:
232:
231:
230:
219:
208:
197:
186:
172:
171:
169:
156:
146:
145:
143:
112:
100:
99:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
856:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
830:
827:
825:
822:
820:
817:
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
795:
792:
790:
787:
786:
784:
777:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:. Thank you.
762:
758:
752:
750:
746:
742:
739:Please go to
737:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
714:
706:
699:
693:
690:
686:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
674:
670:
667:
661:
659:
655:
651:
648:
645:
641:
639:
635:
632:
627:
623:
619:
615:
612:
608:
602:
596:
593:
590:
586:
582:
579:
570:
567:
563:
562:articulated.
559:
552:
550:
547:
546:
544:
534:
519:
515:
509:
506:
505:
502:
489:United States
483:
480:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
467:
463:
461:
458:
457:
454:
450:
449:
441:
430:
428:
425:
421:
420:
416:
410:
409:United States
407:
404:
400:
387:
383:
377:
374:
373:
370:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:
335:
332:
328:
327:
323:
317:
314:
311:
307:
291:
283:
279:
278:
275:
267:
263:
262:
259:
257:
252:
251:
246:
242:
235:
233:
228:criterion met
220:
217:criterion met
209:
206:criterion met
198:
187:
176:
175:
174:
173:
170:
167:
166:
160:
157:
152:
148:
147:
144:
127:
123:
119:
118:
113:
110:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
765:
753:
738:
725:
711:
710:
671:
668:
665:
656:
652:
649:
646:
642:
636:
633:
628:
624:
620:
616:
613:
609:
606:
600:
594:
591:
587:
583:
580:
576:
568:
564:
560:
556:
548:
539:
538:
513:
477:Project Talk
465:
446:
381:
337:
163:
115:
68:WikiProjects
36:no consensus
35:
204:Structure:
58:Start-class
783:Categories
545:standards.
352:open tasks
348:discussion
92:Technology
685:WP:TRIVIA
662:Pop. uses
734:fair use
718:fair use
689:Arthurrh
357:Firearms
344:firearms
316:Firearms
165:criteria
96:Weaponry
28:deletion
516:on the
384:on the
482:Alerts
64:scale.
771:talk
726:this
34:was
508:Low
376:Low
785::
773:)
736:.
687:?
254:/
94:/
90::
769:(
520:.
388:.
354:.
128:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
