Knowledge

Talk:Clenshaw algorithm

Source 📝

745:. The direct use of the expansion in such polynomials is computationally demanding because you have to evaluate all polynomials and then sum them. Moreover, their coefficients are often large with opposite signs so that there is high risk of round-off errors. The Clenshaw formula allows you to evaluate the function value by a recurrence relation without evaluating the polynomials. It is therefore much faster and almost always numerically stable. The equation given here is just a special form for evaluating the series of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, but the algorithm can be used for any polynomial that obeys some recurrence relation. When I have some more time, I will rewrite this chapter generally including detailed derivation and references to literature. -- 81: 71: 53: 725:. In practice you never obtain Chebyshev expansion that way. There are several kinds of polynomials that can be defined by recurrence relations. When determining polynomial series of such polynomials, you often take advantage of their orthogonality or you obtain them as a solution of a differential equation of some kind etc. Now you need to evaluate the function value of such an expansion for some 22: 238:. As a matter of fact, the Clenshaw algorithm is a general method for evaluation of a linear combination of functions that can be expressed using a recurrence formula. If you like, I will describe the general algorithm including the references to relevant literature. -- 573: 456: 133: 346: 723: 624: 485: 379: 299: 236: 696: 670: 209: 818: 743: 644: 186: 127: 769:. It is just for people who have known it allready better before. Now they have learned that there is another suffisticated way to explain it complicated. See 813: 492: 103: 774: 259: 386: 94: 58: 33: 788:
There's an error in the Chebyshev section; the equations listed are only covered to degree 2 for some reason.
21: 778: 263: 585: 307: 750: 596: 243: 39: 80: 255: 791: 102:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
581: 86: 70: 52: 795: 746: 239: 701: 602: 463: 357: 277: 214: 675: 649: 770: 191: 728: 629: 171: 807: 165:
What about Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind? Can they be evaluated quickly?
99: 568:{\displaystyle p\left(x\right)=\sum \limits _{n=0}^{N}a_{n}T_{n}\left(x\right)} 76: 799: 782: 754: 589: 267: 247: 274:
I can't follow this page - is a paragraph or equation missing? What do the
773:'s Methode: "If you understand it, I haven't explained it properly." CBa-- 646:-th order. If you combine the above written equation, you get the set of 451:{\displaystyle p\left(x\right)=\sum \limits _{n=0}^{N}b_{n}x^{n}} 765:
This article is like an answer from the Microsoft User Support:
15: 731: 704: 678: 652: 632: 605: 495: 466: 389: 360: 310: 280: 217: 194: 174: 98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 737: 717: 690: 664: 638: 618: 580:If I find out I will come back and offer a fix -- 567: 479: 450: 373: 340: 293: 230: 203: 180: 132:This article has not yet received a rating on the 168:Yes, they can be evaluated quickly, just replace 8: 595:It is quite easy. Look at the definition of 19: 47: 730: 709: 703: 677: 651: 631: 610: 604: 548: 538: 528: 517: 494: 471: 465: 442: 432: 422: 411: 388: 365: 359: 332: 309: 285: 279: 222: 216: 193: 173: 49: 819:Unknown-priority mathematics articles 487:for the sum of Chebyshev polynomials 341:{\displaystyle p\left(x\right)=b_{0}} 7: 767:short, correct and absolutly useless 354:Given polynomial, with coefficients 92:This article is within the scope of 577:- is that what it was meant to do? 514: 408: 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 112:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 814:Start-Class mathematics articles 460:how do we find the coefficients 115:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 79: 69: 51: 20: 800:17:47, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 755:14:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 248:10:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 106:and see a list of open tasks. 783:10:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC) 590:17:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 761:Like Microsoft User Support 835: 268:23:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 131: 64: 46: 626:is thus a polynomial of 134:project's priority scale 351:I would like to know: 95:WikiProject Mathematics 739: 719: 692: 666: 640: 620: 569: 533: 481: 452: 427: 375: 342: 295: 232: 211:in the expression for 205: 182: 28:This article is rated 740: 720: 718:{\displaystyle a_{n}} 698:unknown coefficients 693: 667: 641: 621: 619:{\displaystyle T_{n}} 597:Chebyshev polynomials 570: 513: 482: 480:{\displaystyle a_{n}} 453: 407: 376: 374:{\displaystyle b_{n}} 343: 304:The last equation ( 296: 294:{\displaystyle b_{n}} 233: 231:{\displaystyle b_{0}} 206: 183: 729: 702: 676: 672:linear equation for 650: 630: 603: 493: 464: 387: 358: 308: 301:actually relate to? 278: 252:That would be nice 215: 192: 172: 118:mathematics articles 691:{\displaystyle N+1} 665:{\displaystyle N+1} 735: 715: 688: 662: 636: 616: 565: 477: 448: 371: 338: 291: 228: 204:{\displaystyle 2x} 201: 178: 87:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 738:{\displaystyle x} 639:{\displaystyle n} 348:) can't be right 270: 258:comment added by 181:{\displaystyle x} 148: 147: 144: 143: 140: 139: 826: 744: 742: 741: 736: 724: 722: 721: 716: 714: 713: 697: 695: 694: 689: 671: 669: 668: 663: 645: 643: 642: 637: 625: 623: 622: 617: 615: 614: 574: 572: 571: 566: 564: 553: 552: 543: 542: 532: 527: 509: 486: 484: 483: 478: 476: 475: 457: 455: 454: 449: 447: 446: 437: 436: 426: 421: 403: 380: 378: 377: 372: 370: 369: 347: 345: 344: 339: 337: 336: 324: 300: 298: 297: 292: 290: 289: 253: 237: 235: 234: 229: 227: 226: 210: 208: 207: 202: 187: 185: 184: 179: 162: 161: 157: 120: 119: 116: 113: 110: 89: 84: 83: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 834: 833: 829: 828: 827: 825: 824: 823: 804: 803: 763: 727: 726: 705: 700: 699: 674: 673: 648: 647: 628: 627: 606: 601: 600: 554: 544: 534: 499: 491: 490: 467: 462: 461: 438: 428: 393: 385: 384: 361: 356: 355: 328: 314: 306: 305: 281: 276: 275: 218: 213: 212: 190: 189: 170: 169: 163: 159: 155: 153: 152: 117: 114: 111: 108: 107: 85: 78: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 832: 830: 822: 821: 816: 806: 805: 786: 771:Alan Greenspan 762: 759: 758: 757: 734: 712: 708: 687: 684: 681: 661: 658: 655: 635: 613: 609: 563: 560: 557: 551: 547: 541: 537: 531: 526: 523: 520: 516: 512: 508: 505: 502: 498: 474: 470: 445: 441: 435: 431: 425: 420: 417: 414: 410: 406: 402: 399: 396: 392: 368: 364: 335: 331: 327: 323: 320: 317: 313: 288: 284: 272: 225: 221: 200: 197: 177: 151: 149: 146: 145: 142: 141: 138: 137: 130: 124: 123: 121: 104:the discussion 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 831: 820: 817: 815: 812: 811: 809: 802: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 784: 780: 776: 775:79.219.230.24 772: 768: 760: 756: 752: 748: 747:Zdeněk Wagner 732: 710: 706: 685: 682: 679: 659: 656: 653: 633: 611: 607: 598: 594: 593: 592: 591: 587: 583: 582:Robertpaynter 578: 575: 561: 558: 555: 549: 545: 539: 535: 529: 524: 521: 518: 510: 506: 503: 500: 496: 488: 472: 468: 458: 443: 439: 433: 429: 423: 418: 415: 412: 404: 400: 397: 394: 390: 382: 366: 362: 352: 349: 333: 329: 325: 321: 318: 315: 311: 302: 286: 282: 271: 269: 265: 261: 260:76.165.224.41 257: 250: 249: 245: 241: 240:Zdeněk Wagner 223: 219: 198: 195: 175: 166: 158: 150: 135: 129: 126: 125: 122: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 82: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 790: 787: 766: 764: 579: 576: 489: 459: 383: 353: 350: 303: 273: 251: 167: 164: 93: 40:WikiProjects 254:—Preceding 109:Mathematics 100:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 808:Categories 256:unsigned 792:Arghman 154:": --> 36:scale. 188:with 796:talk 779:talk 751:talk 586:talk 264:talk 244:talk 156:edit 128:??? 810:: 798:) 781:) 753:) 599:. 588:) 515:∑ 409:∑ 381:: 266:) 246:) 794:( 777:( 749:( 733:x 711:n 707:a 686:1 683:+ 680:N 660:1 657:+ 654:N 634:n 612:n 608:T 584:( 562:) 559:x 556:( 550:n 546:T 540:n 536:a 530:N 525:0 522:= 519:n 511:= 507:) 504:x 501:( 497:p 473:n 469:a 444:n 440:x 434:n 430:b 424:N 419:0 416:= 413:n 405:= 401:) 398:x 395:( 391:p 367:n 363:b 334:0 330:b 326:= 322:) 319:x 316:( 312:p 287:n 283:b 262:( 242:( 224:0 220:b 199:x 196:2 176:x 160:] 136:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
???
project's priority scale
Zdeněk Wagner
talk
10:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
unsigned
76.165.224.41
talk
23:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Robertpaynter
talk
17:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Chebyshev polynomials
Zdeněk Wagner
talk
14:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Alan Greenspan
79.219.230.24
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.