1359:, or perhaps reluctantly leaning that way. Tony makes a good point about how poorly this is handled by Search. On page views the US president is clearly jockeying for #1 if not in that position, which I find a little surprising. No topic dominates views over all others combined. So we fall to more subjective criteria, and it's hard to argue between a major city and a US president which has greater long-term significance. They both have substantial long term significance. Regarding the AP style book, that assumes that the context is a city or other geographical location. You can say "Cleveland" alone, rather than "Cleveland, Ohio" because it is assumed in context that you're writing from or about a particular location, and without specifically specifying where "Cleveland" is, the reader or listener will assume it's in Ohio. Throw that context out, and just say, I'm doing research about Cleveland, it's arguably ambiguous whether you mean that you're researching the city or the president. In contrast, if you're doing research about
918:. I think the city is certainly the primary topic for "Cleveland", as it gets far more page views and is far more significant than any other topic named just Cleveland. While it is true the president is prominent too, I think that "Cleveland" is far more likely refer to the city than him without any qualifiers (just try Google or Google Books, you'll primarily get results about the city if you search just "Cleveland"). And who would want a sports team by searching Cleveland? I think if either the topics the nominator mentions were really wanted by readers searching "Cleveland", the DAB page would be seeing more than 25 hits a day.
1675:. A COI is when someone works for or is otherwise closely connected with the subject of an article, so bias could potentially be included in edits. An instance would be if I worked for the city of Cleveland or the Greater Cleveland Convention and Visitors Bureau. Just because I live in Northeast Ohio and have been involved in editing Cleveland-area articles doesn't mean I have a COI. In the end, my opinion regarding whether the city in Ohio is a primary topic is based on Knowledge precedent and policy, not because I have some local desire for the city to not have "Ohio" in the title. I've edited
974:. Presidents are often referred to by last name only, but not all have gone down particularly well-known as such. This is especially true for Grover; the city was already named and prominent before he took office (population was 261,000ish when he was first elected and only rose from there). I'd say most people would know Cleveland as the Ohio city over Grover, since both are US-centric but the city has the benefit of a large population, several sports teams, and still being around today despite its incorporation predating Grover's birth by 20-or-so years.
1530:, which predates the Arizona city by likely nearly a thousand years. 3.) Significance in general. If you search "Cleveland" on plain Google/Google Books/Google News, you're going to get the city. After nearly 10 pages of results I gave up trying to find more than a handful of things that weren't tangentially Ohio related. This is not the case for "Phoenix", the mythological bird appears straight away, and the city gets buried in other results rather quickly (in addition to the bird, the
1022:, almost all pageviews are from direct links to that article, meaning readers know they're looking for. Using other presidents as examples isn't a fair comparison since the only other president with a name the same as a major city is Washington, which, of course, is also the name of many well-known things including a US state, on top of the reality that the city is often called "Washington, DC" or just "DC". The hatnote at the top of this article is sufficient.
1460:. This article is the clear primary topic for "Cleveland". Its use on its own far outweighs the fact that the president had this name, since it both predates and outlives him. With regards to the disambiguation page, there's more evidence that readers are mostly getting what they want when they search "Cleveland" than not. I don't see anything showing that there is inconvenience here, just speculation.
22:
71:
53:
1550:
additional evidence to support the PRIMARYTOPIC claim - the rest of that comment is straightforward PRIMARYTOPIC argument. USPLACE is at most a tangent in this discussion, and not cited by most of either the !opposers or !supporters. In any event, Nohomersryan does a decent job showing the difference between
Cleveland and Phoenix.
1091:
reality that in some cases, a specific city is understood by most readers without adding that city's US state or country. The AP also does not use "England" or "UK" when it references London, or "France" when it references Paris, even though there are also quite a few places and things in the world named
1447:
identifies
Cleveland as one of the US cities not needing disambiguation by state. The article titles have stable since 2005, and the city's associated category tree was recently renamed to align with the article. There's no good reason to disrupt a setup that's working quite well. Any concerns can be
1258:
You raise an interesting point regarding the searchbox: why is it limited to 10 items? Why not allow up to 15 or more? How is the searchbox item-limit set? The seachbox is a de facto disambiguation, which is problematic when it becomes an incomplete disambiguation. Maybe when the searchbox item-limit
1183:
problems of treating a particular topic familiar to one big group, like
Americans, as more globally significant than they are. Also, we do not treat historical, geographical and other connections as "inherited" for this kinds of analysis, because notability is not heritable. The fact that the sports
1305:
Sorry to prick your logic-balloon, which has just sprayed all over. You must somehow be aware of the proportion of people clicking on "Cleveland" in the WP search facility who know exactly what they're clicking on: care to share this with us? They might be after any of the myriad items listed at the
687:
the US's
Weltanschauung is important here - is that the message you want to give? Oh and the argument above about Cleveland being only briefly a county is disingenuous at best - you don't need to try very hard to understand that its lengthy role as a historic area name predates its brief period as a
682:
that
Cleveland should take you straight off to Ohio - it's monstrous. The English Cleveland is an important historical usage and should not be made into a backwater. People being too lazy to reference things properly (Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland, England) is a separate problem and should not be dealt
1525:
1.) Grover
Cleveland is only occasionally known as Cleveland, whereas there's no other name for the city other than Cleveland. Even "Cleveland, Ohio" is still pretty much just Cleveland. 2.) This has been mentioned a few times, but the city has been in existence since before Grover was born. It was
1166:
by itself as "certainly" meaning the
American city. I'm skeptical they do, since the original Cleveland is an entire region in England with a long history (that our article on it mostly neglects to cover, actually), which has been noted for industry since the Industrial Revolution. At any rate, "I
289:
off somewhere else. There are just too many
Clevelands, and Ohio's city (while most well known for me) is not the only one. This disambiguation works, albeit taking only mere seconds to navigate for someone seeking the Ohio metropolis. However, it is when we are exposed to more information than
1534:
comes up very frequently) For me, a bare search for
Cleveland in Google Books nets a ton results, and nearly every result bar one on the first five pages relates to the Ohio city; it divulges into unrelated meanings far before Grover gets the spotlight. For a search in Google Books for "Phoenix",
1549:
Nobody seems to be using USPLACE as the reason to oppose the move. CTRL-F for "USPLACE" on the page shows one instance to refute the point that all U.S. cities should have the state added to the title, which is against USPLACE; and one instance where the fact that
Cleveland is on the AP list is
715:
Sorry but this link wording: "Cleveland, a former county in England (1974–96) now known as Tees Valley" is VERY difficult to love. In a historical view, the English Cleveland was a county for a few minutes and has been an ex-county for a few minutes more. It was the historic name of an area for
1090:
Yes the AP is American, but their general policy doesn't only apply to American cities. In other words, its a valid secondary source that refers to the city in Ohio as "Cleveland" instead of "Cleveland, Ohio". The way it doesn't use states or countries for certain cities is a reflection on the
135:
I am pretty confused about what has happened to Cleveland, England, but I think that it is no longer a county. There is a Redcar & Cleveland local govt authority but not, as was suggested here and on the relevant page, an actual county of Cleveland. If I'm wrong please let me know! :)
900:– In 2009, Cleveland the city was given primarytopic status, even though Cleveland the president and several Cleveland sports teams each gets many more page views. Clearly this should be a "no primarytopic" situation, and the ambiguous term should go straight to the disambig page.
997:
The reasoning behind why it was originally given Primary Topic status remains true, especially after a year where the city has been in the national spotlight even more than usual with the sports teams and the RNC. Cleveland is one of the cities listed by the
1363:, it will be assumed you mean the prime minister and not any location. If our Search box handled this better, I might be persuaded to keep the status quo, though. I think it will be an improvement to see the search box unambiguously show searching readers
368:
and it's easy to see that Cleveland, Ohio should be Cleveland. Some red-linked towns in australia, a character from family guy, the former president, and a bunch of towns in the US that I didn't know existed except Ohio. This definitely belongs on
1346:
but nor has it really put it on the map and the names "Teesside" and "Tees Valley" are increasingly in use (without any real need for a term to distinguish the non-Darlington area). Hence "Cleveland" on its own normally means the US city even here.
1312:
the rorschach term "Cleveland" gets a zillion hits. Conversely, a DAB page with the title "X (disambiguation)" might just as well be concealed in a dark room with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the leopard"; it will get very few hits.
1217:
ideology (invented and heavily pushed by one particular editor) is stretched to a ridiculous extent. There are so many uses of the sole word, and not all for settlement names. It's a surname, even a given name, and a street name, plus much
1228:? And try this: type slowly in the searchbox and watch. Not till you get to "Cleveland (" or "Cleveland di" do you even know that there is a DAB page. And then, most searchers would be clueless about what they'd get if they selected it.
1651:
failed to mention that he is a resident of Cleveland, Ohio, and is or has been active on numerous wikiprojects and other institutional organisations that are dedicated to the theme of that city. Conflict of interest writ large.
1535:
there's no extra significance for the Arizona city right off the bat; almost everything is about phoenixes or fantasy books about phoenixes, etc. The first book I get that is specifically about Arizona is on the fifth page.
1341:
The US city is well known globally. The British Cleveland is not particularly well known even in the UK outside of the immediate vicinity - the short-lived county may not have generated the hatred of its contemporary
688:
county and ex-county by - ooh, what, a millennium or so? Really, this is a very sad debate. If you do stuff like this then perhaps you should be honest and make it clear that the intention is to make this into
302:
I can't speak for American usage, but to be honest, if somebody says 'Cleveland' to me, I'll think of the American city, not the British usage. (Granted I live in the south of England though). --
1145:
mostly per above. The Cleveland vs. Reagan/Obama analogy breaks down pretty quickly. And the incoming links argument shows that our editors and readers treat the city as the primarytopic.
1052:, which is hardly all of them) should write for American news readers. WP isn't American in scope or language usage, isn't targeted at Americans, and isn't news journalism.
1287:), so it would appear most readers are not being inconvenienced by the disambiguation. If they were looking for another aspect of "Cleveland" and were directed here by the
1263:(disambiguation) into the results, if it exists. Perhaps label it "more" so that it's more clear to readers who may not understand our qualifier "xxx (disambiguation)".
233:
That redirect was a bad mistake and must not be repeated, IMO. Having "Cleveland" is the disamb page is great, having it go to Ohio would be stupid. Don't do it please.
853:
850:. Despite arguments put forth against this, consensus shows that Cleveland the city is, according to the opinions of several editors, the primary topic.
259:
219:
1717:
97:
1171:, but seems to be what the above are really based on. Desperately seeking a primary topic, any primary topic, just to avoid disambiguation leads to
1472:
1429:
1507:
off of primary topic status, in spite of AP style book support for the city not needing Arizona to disambiguate it, while the US president
93:
78:
58:
1010:
over a period of about 14 months, another tool measures how readers get there. In this analysis, the vast majority of the visitors to the
658:
1371:. A compromise here may be to just move the city, and have the base name redirect to the city. That would fix the search box somewhat. –
837:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
144:
Cleveland isn't a county and Redcar & Cleveland is a part of the former county but it doesn't cover parts of the ex-county such as
1526:
already thriving when he won his first election, and obviously he's dead now and it's still going. This is obviously not the case for
1403:
577:
don't enjoy the same status—this month. They're moved back and forth on a regular basis, but at the moment redirects are the vogue.
1196:
1064:
494:, and a host of other cities. I am unaware of any precedent for choosing article titles explicitly to expose readers to other uses.
611:- The county of Cleveland in England had only a short history. The majority of links for Cleveland will be about the city in Ohio.
1690:
1497:, conflict with another non-geographic article; the Associated Press Stylebook is a reliable source, written in American English.
661:, in which there appeared to be an incipient consensus towards this conclusion, but nothing was ever implemented. At any rate,
1443:. Page views are only one way of measuring this, and all other indicators point to the city as the primary topic. In addition,
1048:
The AP argument isn't valid; that's an American rulebook for how American journalists (working for publications that use the
1679:
more articles on other cities than I have Cleveland and participated in many naming discussions for articles. And just FYI,
759:
This is anti-nonamerican! Cleveland, Ohio is not the first cleveland so cleveland should go to a disambiguation page. Man!
1184:
teams' names derive from the American city is irrelevant, and they don't "stack" to favor that city as the primary topic.
588:
557:
Whether or not to redirect articles for major cities is a question still under debate—currently, cities outside the U.S. (
33:
940:
gets way more hits than Cleveland the city? Presidents are often called by last name; a few are actually primarytopic (
1099:. Again, the Primary Topic aspect comes not from readers' preferences, but how it's referred in secondary sources. --
569:) are rightfully hosted under their name alone, where the topic is clearly the primary one, but American cities like
1221:
879:
720:
than that. Furthermore it maps BADLY onto Tees Valley. I've replaced that wording with something that makes sense.
479:
467:
421:
370:
347:
248:
207:
199:
1571:
828:
548:
511:. There is no excuse for thrusting a disambiguation page at the reader who just wants to read about Cleveland. --
802:
657:, and so forth are also moved to the article without the state name. There was a lengthy discussion of this at
449:
83:
456:, of course). This seems standard practice to me, when one use of a name is far more common than the others. -
1126:
1092:
1002:
as not needing a state with it since it's generally understood "Cleveland" is referring to this city. While
526:
678:. It is fine how it is right now, thank you very much, with Cleveland as the disambiguation page. There is
21:
1540:
1399:
1180:
1096:
979:
923:
645:
as well, but only as part of a general settlement of American city-naming issues, where other cities like
516:
389:
177:
1605:
I've changed it to a more appropriate wording based on your request. I still stand by my close, however.
721:
693:
234:
1698:
1581:
1348:
1296:
1193:
1104:
1061:
1039:
838:
773:
744:
669:
584:
226:
That redirect was the correct thing to do, IMO. I'm requesting a reinstatement the move and redirect. -
152:
39:
1395:
181:
1684:
1463:
1420:
1391:
1527:
1500:
810:
537:
should get us to page for the Ohio city, whether it's titled "Cleveland" or "Cleveland, Ohio". --
486:'s 'what links here' shows the vast majority are looking for the Ohio city. This would also match
1630:
1595:
1555:
1150:
961:
905:
733:
683:
with by just going with the US consensus. If you make this change you are once again saying that
282:
290:
we were searching for leading us down paths we never intended to traverse that we learn stuff. —
1124:
The city is unambiguously the primary topic, despite sharing a name with a two-term president.
1613:
1536:
1516:
1484:
1444:
1414:
1376:
1268:
1168:
1162:. I would like to see input from non-Americans, especially whether non-US publications treat
975:
919:
865:
570:
512:
495:
413:
1590:
The close might be OK if it said "in the opinion of lots of editors" rather than "in fact".
1694:
1648:
1508:
1504:
1490:
1292:
1187:
1100:
1055:
1035:
1019:
1003:
999:
970:
He doesn't get "way more". If you discount the spike from this year's election, the city is
937:
770:
741:
737:
666:
578:
397:
314:
303:
291:
173:
149:
1680:
1660:
1449:
1321:
1241:
1176:
1015:
794:
632:
601:
475:
453:
441:
425:
381:
353:
336:
263:
255:
227:
215:
195:
1625:
Thanks. The idea that primarytopic status is a matter of "fact" seemed highly peculiar.
1493:
lists as not requiring the state qualifier in a journalistic context, unless they, like
1031:
1025:
1702:
1665:
1634:
1620:
1599:
1559:
1544:
1531:
1520:
1476:
1452:
1433:
1407:
1380:
1351:
1326:
1300:
1272:
1246:
1205:
1172:
1154:
1137:
1108:
1073:
1043:
983:
965:
927:
909:
872:
814:
806:
778:
763:
760:
749:
405:
258:. This move was made and than undone, but it seems like a good idea. See discussion at
184:
157:
1693:) is also from the Cleveland area. Doesn't lessen that editor's opinion in any way. --
1711:
1672:
1626:
1591:
1551:
1146:
957:
901:
574:
457:
384:
should not be moved. The current name conforms to naming conventions. For reference,
373:
169:
145:
137:
1034:: 3,397/day out of 3,414 hits per day total. President Cleveland: 3 hits per day. --
1606:
1512:
1372:
1280:
1264:
1007:
971:
858:
790:
736:'s borough's in total have a population over 500,000. Also, the fact you have have
654:
622:
502:
482:), as there seems to be no other significant current usage for the name--a scan of
417:
1489:
Current convention is to omit the state only with the well-known cities which the
769:
It would seem that consensus deems Cleveland, OH is more notable than the rest.
646:
612:
385:
274:
1653:
1580:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1343:
1314:
1234:
1132:
1028:: 3,026/day out of 3,560 hits per day total. Cleveland, Ohio: 342 hits per day
941:
703:
598:
538:
1360:
1288:
1284:
1011:
888:
883:
798:
690:
us.wikipedia.org, the wikipedia that believes in US domination of the world.
662:
642:
534:
491:
483:
471:
445:
437:
365:
357:
343:
332:
286:
278:
244:
203:
566:
956:). Why do you think the city should be primarytopic in such a situation?
562:
525:. It's by far the best known Cleveland. Not unlike the situation with
1494:
650:
409:
393:
1388:—All U.S. cities should be followed by their state. Cleveland, Ohio.
1231:
Why are we intent on inconveniencing readers-in-search to this extent?
949:
530:
70:
52:
1291:
article hatnote, there would be significantly more traffic here. --
953:
945:
558:
487:
401:
285:
in England and moving the unconfusing disambiguation currently at
440:, it is clear to me that nearly all of them are meant to link to
436:. Looking at the many links to the current disambiguation page
176:. This is helpful in determining Cleveland's honor rank. (See
15:
1499:
Those claiming that USPLACE supports this need to argue why
732:
In my opinion, Cleveland should redirect to this disambig.
260:
Knowledge talk:How to rename (move) a page#Redirect policy?
893:
88:
1511:
doesn't have as strong a pull as the mythical bird. –
1018:
is a distant second, generating 342 hits per day. For
254:
The Cleveland article would then become a redirect to
96:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
1570:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
641:. I would support having the article on the city at
313:
think of the American city if you know what I mean. —
659:
Knowledge talk:Naming conventions (cities and towns)
841:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1584:. No further edits should be made to this section.
86:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can
76:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
1259:is exceeded, the search algorithm should force
1220:One measure of this folly is to take a look at
1167:personally usually think of the American city"
740:, which is surely another notable Cleveland?
8:
665:should certainly redirect to the Ohio city.
1503:is a sufficiently strong contender to pull
309:I don't know about you, but I would rather
82:, an attempt to structure and organize all
19:
1389:
1014:article are getting there from that link.
827:The following is a closed discussion of a
448:would be a redirect there (with a link to
47:
92:attached to this talk page, or visit the
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1643:Failure to disclose interest in RM above
1417:, "Cleveland" is one of the exceptions.
785:Cleveland, Ohio notice of requested move
210:but it seems like it should definitely
194:Someone tried to redirect this page to
49:
1488:
1279:This disambiguation page gets a whole
1008:slightly more pageviews than the city
7:
846:The result of the move request was:
168:True or false: many of these in the
106:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation
803:Talk:Cleveland, Ohio#Requested move
109:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
1718:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
69:
51:
20:
820:Requested move 10 December 2016
466:moving the disamb page back to
273:for the same reasons I opposed
1169:isn't a legit oppose rationale
815:14:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
779:20:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
764:17:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
158:20:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
1703:14:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
1666:08:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
1635:04:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
1621:04:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
1600:03:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
1560:18:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1545:17:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1521:17:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1477:15:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1453:14:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1434:15:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1408:05:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1381:18:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
1352:11:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
1327:05:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
1301:14:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
1283:(compared with 3,057/day for
1273:17:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
1247:07:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
1206:07:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
1185:
1155:17:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
1138:13:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
1109:14:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
1074:07:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
1053:
1044:05:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
984:05:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
966:04:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
928:03:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
910:23:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
873:03:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
750:19:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
180:for what an honor rank is.)
591:) 04:02, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
339:; what I'll fully support:
1734:
936:Don't the stats show that
880:Cleveland (disambiguation)
728:Another redirect arguement
480:Cleveland (disambiguation)
468:Cleveland (disambiguation)
422:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
371:Cleveland (disambiguation)
348:Cleveland (disambiguation)
249:Cleveland (disambiguation)
208:Cleveland (disambiguation)
200:Cleveland (disambiguation)
79:WikiProject Disambiguation
718:really quite a bit longer
635:06:37, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
505:19:55, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
450:Cleveland (disamiguation)
444:, so it makes sense that
306:16:20, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
266:01:34, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
230:01:18, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
202:page. Perhaps THIS page
140:19:02 Dec 15, 2002 (UTC)
64:
46:
1577:Please do not modify it.
1448:resolved via hatnote. -
834:Please do not modify it.
724:18:27, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
625:22:51, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
615:15:06, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
604:12:58, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
551:00:02, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
541:23:55, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
519:23:52, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
498:19:28, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
478:(which already links to
460:19:24, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
428:18:46, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
376:17:05, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
317:16:46, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
294:16:25, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
218:automatically. See also
185:15:51, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
1222:the disambiguation page
938:Cleveland the president
789:There is a proposal on
706:19:42, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
696:18:40, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
672:02:10, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
527:Boston (disambiguation)
237:18:27, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
112:Disambiguation articles
1213:—Here, this so-called
390:Minneapolis, Minnesota
206:should be a direct to
178:Talk:George Washington
198:. He also created a
549:Philip Baird Shearer
281:about his preferred
1647:I note that editor
1528:Phoenix (mythology)
1501:Phoenix (mythology)
1367:rather than simply
30:disambiguation page
972:often ahead of him
734:Cleveland, England
364:Look at what's on
277:attempt at making
131:Cleveland, England
34:content assessment
1410:
1394:comment added by
857:
854:non-admin closure
571:Chicago, Illinois
414:Detroit, Michigan
128:
127:
124:
123:
120:
119:
1725:
1663:
1658:
1618:
1611:
1579:
1509:Grover Cleveland
1505:Phoenix, Arizona
1491:Associated Press
1466:
1423:
1349:Timrollpickering
1324:
1319:
1244:
1239:
1224:... how long is
1204:
1135:
1129:
1072:
1032:Grover Cleveland
1020:Grover Cleveland
1004:Grover Cleveland
1000:Associated Press
896:
870:
863:
851:
836:
776:
747:
738:Grover Cleveland
398:Atlanta, Georgia
331:the redirect of
174:Grover Cleveland
155:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
91:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1708:
1707:
1661:
1654:
1645:
1614:
1607:
1588:
1575:
1475:
1465:Taylor Trescott
1464:
1432:
1422:Taylor Trescott
1421:
1365:Cleveland, Ohio
1322:
1315:
1242:
1235:
1202:
1181:WP:SYSTEMICBIAS
1160:Support for now
1133:
1127:
1070:
1016:Cleveland, Ohio
894:Cleveland, Ohio
892:
866:
859:
832:
822:
795:Cleveland, Ohio
787:
774:
757:
745:
730:
713:
476:Cleveland, Ohio
454:Cleveland, Ohio
442:Cleveland, Ohio
424:, and so on. -
382:Cleveland, Ohio
354:Cleveland, Ohio
337:Cleveland, Ohio
256:Cleveland, Ohio
252:
216:Cleveland, Ohio
196:Cleveland, Ohio
192:
166:
164:True or false??
153:
133:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
87:
12:
11:
5:
1731:
1729:
1721:
1720:
1710:
1709:
1706:
1705:
1644:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1587:
1586:
1572:requested move
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1547:
1479:
1471:
1455:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1428:
1383:
1354:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1251:
1250:
1208:
1200:
1157:
1140:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1068:
1029:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
931:
930:
898:
897:
886:
876:
844:
843:
829:requested move
823:
821:
818:
786:
783:
782:
781:
756:
753:
729:
726:
722:138.37.188.109
712:
711:Engish wording
709:
708:
707:
697:
694:138.37.188.109
673:
636:
626:
616:
605:
592:
552:
542:
520:
509:Strong support
506:
499:
461:
452:at the top of
430:
429:
406:Miami, Florida
378:
377:
362:
361:
360:
350:
321:
320:
319:
318:
296:
295:
251:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:138.37.188.109
191:
188:
172:are honors of
165:
162:
161:
160:
132:
129:
126:
125:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
103:Disambiguation
84:disambiguation
74:
62:
61:
59:Disambiguation
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1730:
1719:
1716:
1715:
1713:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1689:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1671:That's not a
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1664:
1659:
1657:
1650:
1642:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1612:
1610:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1585:
1583:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1567:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1548:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1533:
1529:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1496:
1492:
1486:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1474:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1451:
1446:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1416:
1412:
1411:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1337:
1336:
1329:
1328:
1325:
1320:
1318:
1311:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1281:30 hits a day
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1249:
1248:
1245:
1240:
1238:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1223:
1216:
1215:primary topic
1212:
1209:
1207:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1075:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
996:
993:
992:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
968:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
934:
933:
932:
929:
925:
921:
917:
914:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
895:
890:
887:
885:
881:
878:
877:
875:
874:
871:
869:
864:
862:
855:
849:
842:
840:
835:
830:
825:
824:
819:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
784:
780:
777:
772:
768:
767:
766:
765:
762:
754:
752:
751:
748:
743:
739:
735:
727:
725:
723:
719:
710:
705:
701:
698:
695:
691:
686:
681:
677:
674:
671:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
637:
634:
630:
627:
624:
620:
617:
614:
610:
606:
603:
600:
596:
593:
590:
586:
582:
581:
576:
575:Dallas, Texas
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
553:
550:
546:
543:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
521:
518:
514:
510:
507:
504:
500:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
431:
427:
423:
420:redirects to
419:
415:
412:redirects to
411:
407:
404:redirects to
403:
399:
396:redirects to
395:
391:
388:redirects to
387:
383:
380:
379:
375:
372:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
349:
345:
341:
340:
338:
334:
330:
327:the move but
326:
323:
322:
316:
312:
308:
307:
305:
301:
298:
297:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:
268:
267:
265:
261:
257:
250:
246:
243:
236:
232:
231:
229:
225:
224:
223:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
189:
187:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
170:United States
163:
159:
156:
151:
147:
146:Middlesbrough
143:
142:
141:
139:
130:
116:
99:
95:
90:
89:edit the page
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1687:
1676:
1655:
1646:
1616:(talk to me)
1615:
1608:
1589:
1576:
1569:
1537:Nohomersryan
1481:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1440:
1419:
1418:
1396:ExNeddiesBoy
1390:— Preceding
1385:
1368:
1364:
1356:
1338:
1316:
1309:
1307:
1260:
1236:
1233:
1230:
1225:
1219:
1214:
1210:
1188:
1163:
1159:
1142:
1125:
1122:Oppose move.
1121:
1056:
1050:AP Stylebook
1049:
994:
976:Nohomersryan
920:Nohomersryan
915:
899:
868:(talk to me)
867:
860:
847:
845:
833:
826:
788:
758:
731:
717:
714:
699:
692:Mmm. nice.
689:
684:
679:
675:
655:Philadelphia
638:
628:
618:
608:
594:
579:
554:
544:
522:
513:Tony Sidaway
508:
496:Niteowlneils
463:
433:
418:Philadelphia
328:
324:
310:
299:
270:
253:
211:
193:
182:66.245.64.54
167:
134:
94:project page
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
1695:JonRidinger
1649:JonRidinger
1582:move review
1532:French band
1450:Eureka Lott
1293:JonRidinger
1261:search term
1189:SMcCandlish
1101:JonRidinger
1057:SMcCandlish
1036:JonRidinger
839:move review
771:Computerjoe
742:Computerjoe
647:Los Angeles
470:and making
386:Minneapolis
315:ExplorerCDT
292:ExplorerCDT
150:Computerjoe
1681:EurekaLott
1485:WP:USPLACE
1445:WP:USPLACE
1415:WP:USPLACE
1344:Humberside
942:Eisenhower
633:Neutrality
474:redir to
426:EurekaLott
264:EurekaLott
228:EurekaLott
98:discussion
1369:Cleveland
1361:Gladstone
1306:DAB page.
1289:Cleveland
1285:Cleveland
1164:Cleveland
1026:Cleveland
1012:Cleveland
889:Cleveland
884:Cleveland
848:not moved
807:Una Smith
799:Cleveland
761:Serminigo
663:Cleveland
643:Cleveland
535:Cleveland
501:Support.
492:Vancouver
484:Cleveland
472:Cleveland
446:Cleveland
438:Cleveland
366:Cleveland
358:Cleveland
344:Cleveland
333:Cleveland
287:Middlesex
283:Middlesex
279:Middlesex
245:Cleveland
204:Cleveland
190:Redirect?
1712:Category
1691:contribs
1627:Dicklyon
1592:Dicklyon
1552:Dohn joe
1473:my edits
1430:my edits
1413:Not per
1404:contribs
1392:unsigned
1177:WP:UNDUE
1147:Dohn joe
958:Dicklyon
902:Dicklyon
793:to move
563:Calcutta
555:Support.
503:→Raul654
458:R. fiend
374:Cburnett
275:Jooler's
138:Nevilley
1662:(talk)
1609:JudgeRM
1513:wbm1058
1495:Phoenix
1482:Comment
1386:Support
1373:wbm1058
1357:Support
1323:(talk)
1265:wbm1058
1243:(talk)
1211:Support
1173:WP:NPOV
1134:(talk)
861:JudgeRM
801:; see
775:'s talk
746:'s talk
700:Support
651:Chicago
639:Support
629:Support
623:up◦land
619:Support
609:Support
595:Support
545:Support
523:Support
464:Support
434:Support
410:Detroit
394:Atlanta
325:Support
300:Support
154:'s talk
1673:WP:COI
1458:Oppose
1441:Oppose
1339:Oppose
1310:course
1308:So of
1179:, and
1143:Oppose
1093:London
995:Oppose
950:Reagan
916:Oppose
680:no way
676:Oppose
613:Jooler
602:(Talk)
567:Yangôn
531:Boston
329:oppose
271:Oppose
214:go to
36:scale.
1487:says
1470:- +
1427:- +
1218:more.
1097:Paris
1006:gets
954:Obama
946:Nixon
791:WP:RM
704:Carrp
599:ALoan
587:&
559:Kyoto
539:Curps
488:Miami
402:Miami
352:Move
342:Move
28:This
1699:talk
1685:talk
1656:Tony
1631:talk
1596:talk
1556:talk
1541:talk
1517:talk
1400:talk
1377:talk
1317:Tony
1297:talk
1269:talk
1237:Tony
1226:that
1151:talk
1128:ONR
1105:talk
1095:and
1040:talk
980:talk
962:talk
952:and
924:talk
906:talk
811:talk
805:. --
755:What
685:only
667:john
621:. /
573:and
529:and
517:Talk
220:here
1677:far
1574:.
1203:ⱷ≼
1199:≽ⱷ҅
1071:ⱷ≼
1067:≽ⱷ҅
797:to
597:--
580:ADH
533:.
335:to
311:not
304:Neo
212:not
1714::
1701:)
1633:)
1598:)
1558:)
1543:)
1519:)
1406:)
1402:•
1379:)
1299:)
1271:)
1186:—
1175:,
1153:)
1107:)
1054:—
1042:)
982:)
964:)
948:,
944:,
926:)
908:)
891:→
882:→
831:.
813:)
702:.
653:,
649:,
631:.
565:,
561:,
547:.
490:,
416:,
408:,
400:,
392:,
356:→
346:→
262:-
247:→
222:.
148:.
1697:(
1688:·
1683:(
1629:(
1594:(
1554:(
1539:(
1515:(
1398:(
1375:(
1295:(
1267:(
1201:ᴥ
1197:¢
1194:☏
1191:☺
1149:(
1103:(
1069:ᴥ
1065:¢
1062:☏
1059:☺
1038:(
978:(
960:(
922:(
904:(
856:)
852:(
809:(
670:k
607:'
589:m
585:t
583:(
515:|
100:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
