1636:) It is not NPOV to claim that something which demonstrably, factually, historically did not happen might have happened. To claim that the accusations might be true is essentially no different, as far as NPOV policy goes, from claiming that the Holocaust didn't happen (with apologies for Godwin's law, but I think it's an apt comparison for what the NPOV policy does and does not mean). There are not two positions on the matter to balance between; there is only one position. It may be appropriate to have a "Duke Lacross denialism" page to match
584:
441:
410:
1321:(I have taken the admittedly unusual step to edit the section title because it was highly misleading and frankly attracting the wrong kind of attention. The sources cited by the main article indicate that the Duke lacrosse players were declared legally and factually innocent by North Carolina legal officials, which is as close to absolute proof as is possible to get. As the cited sources stand, the other position is a fringe position. I have, of course, not edited any signed discussion.
544:
342:
321:
451:
556:
1561:
accusation is completely wrong, particularly in relation to those who were falsely accused. On top of all that, we know the original prosecutor to be a "rogue prosecutor", which is surely the nail in the coffin for any of those attempting to deny reality. I strongly suggest people read the superb book "Until proven innocent" to learn more about the reality of the case, that's by far the best and most comprehensive resource available
1024:(D.Md.1993) (dismissing § 1985(3) claim because plaintiff, as a white male, was not a member of a class that has suffered historically pervasive discrimination); Blackmon v. Perez, 791 F. Supp. 1086, 1093 (E.D.Va.1992) (dismissing § 1985(3) claims by white plaintiffs because "plaintiffs do not represent a class of persons who not enjoy the possibility of effective state enforcement of their rights" (internal quotations omitted))"
1660:
enough credibility weight to be more than a tiny fringe theory) which seriously question whether the claims might have been true after all, then NPOV would of course demand that the article not take a position on the claims. But such sources are not yet quoted by the article, and we should be judging articles based on the sources we have not the sources some editors would like to have in the name of "parallels" to other cases.
802:
781:
812:
719:
701:
900:
882:
230:
290:
260:
637:
616:
1576:
would be in a change to any article which adds irrelevant information about victims. I have reverted both changes.(I would support re-changing the lede to remove the fact that the rape accusations were false if the change also added reliable sources that the rape actually occurred. None of the existing RS on this article seem to support that position.)
1690:
Since the editors maintaining the fringe position have now been absent for two weeks, I am removing the tag. I am also concerned that the section heading in this talk page is attracting politically motivated editors unfamiliar with the source material quoted in the article like flies to... excrement,
1625:
The difference is that the players were victims in fact, and Magnum was not. This is perhaps the clearest case in recent public memory of a false accusation which was later proven as far as possible to be false, and to deny this because it's so rare and proof is essentially impossible is perverse. To
1217:
Or maybe you are being intentionally facetious, because at no time did I say that either "controversial" (or "controversy") are in the lede section of that article. But what I did say is that the OJ article lede makes clear that cases which were widely reported in the news ought to be stated as such,
1088:
The case evoked varied responses from the media, faculty groups, students, the community, and others. The case's resolution sparked public discussion of racism, media bias, and due process on campuses, and ultimately led to the resignation and disbarment of the lead prosecutor, Durham County
District
1023:
Here is one reference to the fact with a link to the decision. " ("As recognized by the controlling law in the Fourth
Circuit, the only class of persons protected by Section 1985(3) are African Americans.") (citing Harrison, 766 F.2d at 161-62); Stock v. Universal Foods Corp., 817 F. Supp. 1300, 1310
1610:
Could I request that in this discussion, we use names (or players/lacrosse players for Evans, Finnerty and
Seligmann as a group), as that would make it easier to follow the conversation. EG the use of victim is confusing, because both the players and Magnum have been described as victims in sources.
1148:
I'm not sure if you understand the point at issue: Each year that passes, it becomes less and less known to younger adults how much of a ruckus this case was in the national media. And, given the ordinary propensity of the typical reader to want up-front information about long articles, for the more
1110:
Having followed this case very carefully from Day 1, and having read copious amounts on the topic, my feeling is that it was the controversial aspects which made the news of this case go and stay viral enough that many people followed it closely until resolution. Thus, I suggest we include the word.
1675:
Considering the North
Carolina States Attorney, Roy Cooper, in his official capacity declared the accused students as "Innocent," there doesn't seem to much room for a debate about the whether the accusations are false. An official, legal determination was made, as a matter of legal record. Nifong
1594:
Further, could you explain why that's not GF? I agree, it's the wrong place and possibly irrelevant to include, but that's why articles are written by multiple people. The two edits co-occuring also isn't any reason to be suspicious, not only were both adequately described in the edit summary, they
1575:
Above talk shows that there's consensus for the pre-existing lede being NPOV and confirmed by multiple sources. Moreover since the change was accompanied by adding irrelevant information about the history of the victims in this case, I'm a little doubtful about the good faith in this instance, as I
1630:
credible sources who even entertain the likelihood of the accusations being anything more than a total fabrication by the perpetrator (who is currently serving a jail sentence for murder), among all credible sources which post-date the discrediting and trial of Mike Nifong. (Sources predating this
970:
In the section titled "Lawsuits filed by players", the article asserts: "the players' civil rights claims, which constituted the bulk of their
Complaint, were dismissed on the grounds that the applicable civil rights laws pertained only to persons of African-American descent." The stated source is
1201:
Maybe I need a new pair of glasses, but I don't see the word "controversial" (or "controversy") in the lead section. Its only appearance in the text is in the "Trial" section, describing not the whole case but a specific decision by the prosecutor that "would prove to be highly controversial". So
1167:
understand the point at issue: the word "controversial" is completely devoid of meaning. Controversial to whom? What was controversial? Social
Security is controversial, the moon landing is controversial, the New England Patriots are controversial, and fluoride in drinking water is controversial.
1736:
Just read the report by Durham PD police Sgt. J.R. Shelton on the night of the non-incident. Sgt. Shelton exposed
Crystal Gail Mangum as a fraud at the time, and the sergeant paid dearly for it. His police superiors destroyed his life, in retaliation for his telling the truth. Clearly, there are
1659:
But to be extremely clear at the expense of repeating myself, my above position is predicated on the overwhelming weight of credible sources - those postdating the discrediting of Nifong and Magnum - giving no credence whatsoever to the claims. If sufficient reliable sources could be shown (with
1560:
As the article states, the falsely accused were all declared innocent, that's totally different to cases where charges are dropped, such as due to a lack of evidence, and arguments above discussing such scenarios are utterly irrelevant here. Thus, anyone suggesting this might not be a false rape
1336:
It is showing some bias to label this case a "false allegation" because the case was never brought to trial, the charges were dropped. Not enough evidence to prosecute doesn't imply a false accusation. The alleged victim still maintains, even over 10 years later, she was sexually assaulted that
1506:
Thank you for bringing this up. I agree. I do not think the current lede sentence is NPOV. The three citations are also not about the basic story but about much later events. As an alternative lede, may I suggest: The Duke lacrosse case was a widely reported 2006 criminal case in Durham, North
1436:
Well that seems like cherry-picking... I would point out that plenty of reliable sources do not refer to the allegations as "false" but as baseless or unsubstantiated, which is a different category from false accusation. I'm just wondering why the wording "false" was decided on as opposed to
1477:
are a good treatment; however, stating in the lead that its good, while not explicitly contradictory to the truth which is that it's deeply unproven, would give undue weight. While in this situation, it's not quite that obvious that the two are different, it would still be
1729:“Duke lacrosse case” is simply false. Not only were the Duke Three declared innocent by the then-North Carolina Attorney General, and there was never any trial (“case” implies that a trial took place), but it was determined the very night of what career criminal
1111:
And I think the very nature of the intensely contrasting postures of the early stage opinion camps is where the heat of the notability for this case arose from. Few cases of false accusations in recent times have stirred up this much controversy.
989:
These laws do not limit their protection of civil rights to
African Americans and their descendants, and any judge who wrote so would be laughed off the bench. They were invoked in the 1960s when local authorities were involved in the murders of
1472:
isn't just about having an RS - just because you can show that some places have said that its false, it doesn't mean that you can put it in the lead. For example, many reasonably reliable sources (including the
Australian government) state that
1644:
you can find sufficient sources for such (which I claim don't exist), but much like the mentioned parallel such views don't merit a change to the the main article or a "neutral" stance on whether historical facts are real.
164:
1633:
This is no different from how we would not use sources pre-dating
Einstein to say that Newton's theories were correct and general relativity is doubtful because those sources did not describe Newton's theories as
274:
1525:
is also a case in which the accuser has largely been discounted but the Knowledge (XXG) page does not state that it was a false accusation. I think consistency across these types of cases would be appropriate.
1541:
After waiting over a week, I made the lede sentence factual NPOV. The wording is now more in keeping with another case widely recognized as a false accusation and which is listed in the "see also" section:
683:
1741:
1626:
change the article from correctly pointing out that the accusations were false to anything else is to rewrite history to suit current political objectives, and nothing more. There are, I repeat,
1507:
Carolina, United States in which three members of the Duke University men's lacrosse team were charged with sexual assault. The charges were eventually dropped and are widely accepted as false.
1030:
648:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1838:
649:
1788:
1464:
It does show that the preferred term in the media is not "false accusations". Combining the two (stating that false and unsubstantiated can be seen as the same thing) is OR, specifically
481:
1422:
Reliable sources allow us to avoid arguments about what people believe or don't. In this case, reliable sources say the accusations were false, so that is what this article reports.
1873:
940:
747:
644:
621:
498:
946:
1027:
Seeing as the judge was not laughed off the bench, you are very clearly incorrect and should probably not make such statements of opinion as if they were fact in the future.
158:
1733:
put, with the help of corrupt media, a corrupt sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE), corrupt Duke University officials, and a corrupt DA into motion, that this was a hoax.
1269:- these cases all did. I'd like to see a consistent practice in regards to noting this aspect of the big news cases, up front. In fact, some cases are so (dare I say it?)
534:
1676:
was disbarred for (among many other things) false statements. Again, a matter of official legal record. The wording should remain as it, and the tag should be removed.
1798:
1020:
I shows a very clear bias in your editing that you elected to not actually read the decision itself which explicitly states what you are claiming to be "dubious."
574:
1878:
1848:
1833:
1783:
673:
524:
1486:
issue to put false in the opening sentence if it is not the majority viewpoint. I believe aiming for balance is why an edit combining both was proposed below. --
916:
743:
488:
1361:
90:
1149:
controversial cases we should include that word in the lede; thusly placed, it alerts readers up-front to the fact that this case was a big deal in the news.
1803:
392:
1823:
1522:
493:
1868:
1843:
991:
975:
55:
1773:
382:
907:
887:
726:
706:
1793:
1168:
What meaning does the word convey? Only by explaining why people cared about a charge of false rape in North Carolina do we convey some meaning. —
96:
1828:
1818:
1813:
1778:
999:
598:
864:
569:
420:
1405:
978:, cites three Reconstruction Era civil rights laws as the basis for its civil rights claims: 42 USC 1983, 1985, and 1986, better known as the
464:
415:
358:
1763:
1858:
1711:
854:
41:
1133:
Can you reply to the question I asked above: what additional information does the word "controversial" convey that's not already there? —
1238:
1208:
1174:
1097:
1072:
1008:
1745:
1768:
1452:
A source calling the allegations baseless or unsubstantiated would not contradict the multiple sources calling the allegations false.
1034:
476:
221:
593:
424:
110:
1863:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
349:
326:
115:
31:
1808:
1385:
472:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
179:
85:
1543:
146:
301:
1139:
979:
76:
1631:
are generally not reliable as they were tainted by proven-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt lies by powerful government officials.
1002:. They apply whenever government infringes on citizens' civil rights, not just on the civil rights of African Americans. —
1853:
1681:
825:
786:
140:
1262:
229:
196:
1247:
Perhaps we are misunderstanding each other, I cited the OJ article as an example of the importance of noting such
120:
1266:
1254:
1184:
1091:
What additional information does the word "controversial" convey to the reader that those two sentences don't? —
240:
1677:
136:
1715:
307:
269:
1566:
1076:
1056:
829:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1232:
Silly me. For a week you had argued for the inclusion of the word "controversial" in the first sentence. —
1187:
and tell me that trials and cases can't be notable merely because they are notable. They can and some are.
1696:
1665:
1650:
1581:
1326:
1280:
186:
66:
1456:
1437:
unsubstantiated? Is it because the sources use the exact phrase "false accusation" in them? Thank you.
1426:
1233:
1203:
1169:
1092:
1003:
915:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
561:
357:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
81:
1550:
1531:
1512:
983:
456:
1483:
289:
1730:
1362:"Crystal Mangum, stripper who falsely accused Duke lacrosse players, charged with attempted murder"
172:
1337:
night. The case was determined to be unsubstantiated. People BELIEVE the allegations were false.
583:
1616:
1600:
1562:
1491:
1258:
245:
35:
1479:
1275:
that the pubic reaction to the outcome literally shapes history, such as how the outcome of the
440:
409:
152:
1692:
1661:
1646:
1577:
1322:
62:
1591:
The above talk may show consensus, but this talk is a new one and doesn't have consensus that
1469:
1253:, when a case/trial was very notable in the media. Not all cases make big news, but some do;
1637:
1453:
1442:
1423:
1381:
1342:
1288:
1223:
1192:
1154:
1116:
912:
731:
543:
242:
1465:
1546:
1527:
1508:
1353:
1071:
This case is notable because it was controversial; this should be included in the lede.
341:
320:
17:
1000:
a suburban Philadelphia school district was sued for spying on students in their homes
1757:
1612:
1596:
1487:
1474:
1134:
469:
995:
1406:"The stripper who cried 'rape': Revisiting the Duke lacrosse case ten years later"
801:
780:
1356:
say. Multiple reliable sources characterize Mangum's accusations as false, e.g.:
1503:
1438:
1338:
1284:
1276:
1219:
1188:
1150:
1112:
811:
1317:
Was this case proven a false accusation? (According to the sources cited, yes.)
817:
807:
735:
551:
446:
244:
1749:
1719:
1700:
1685:
1669:
1654:
1620:
1604:
1585:
1570:
1554:
1535:
1516:
1495:
1459:
1446:
1429:
1346:
1330:
1292:
1242:
1227:
1212:
1196:
1178:
1158:
1143:
1120:
1101:
1080:
1038:
1012:
718:
700:
899:
881:
468:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1057:
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2177560/mcfadyen-v-duke-university/
354:
259:
739:
636:
615:
353:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of
1218:
in whatever terms are appropriate, in the lede of the article.
830:
742:
on Knowledge (XXG). Please visit the project page to join the
283:
254:
246:
26:
582:
542:
278:. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
971:"Judge James Beaty, Memorandum Opinion, March 31, 2011."
658:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1386:"North Carolina: Woman in Duke case guilty in killing"
171:
911:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
730:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1706:
Excessively long article, should be reduced by 50%.
185:
945:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1839:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
661:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1789:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1740:The proper title would be, The Duke Rape Hoax.
982:or the Ku Klux Klan Act. The laws can be seen
1737:“editors” here, who wish to keep hoax alive.
8:
1874:Unknown-importance African diaspora articles
925:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject African diaspora
756:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Higher education
1523:Sexual assault allegation against Joe Biden
1691:so I will reword it in a subsequent edit.
876:
775:
695:
610:
404:
315:
509:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
272:by Knowledge (XXG) editors, which is now
1710:Far too long article. Get to the point,
974:The players' lawsuit, which can be seen
645:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1742:2603:7000:B23E:33EE:44B4:87F9:2DA4:14F4
1049:
878:
777:
697:
612:
406:
317:
287:
1799:Low-importance North Carolina articles
1087:
1031:2602:304:CE5F:C290:3DDB:3A5A:8B70:3BA4
1879:WikiProject African diaspora articles
1849:WikiProject Higher education articles
1834:Low-importance Crime-related articles
1784:Low-importance United States articles
1352:Knowledge (XXG) articles report what
928:Template:WikiProject African diaspora
759:Template:WikiProject Higher education
7:
986:by clicking on 1983, 1985, or 1986.
905:This article is within the scope of
823:This article is within the scope of
724:This article is within the scope of
642:This article is within the scope of
462:This article is within the scope of
367:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Lacrosse
347:This article is within the scope of
1804:WikiProject North Carolina articles
833:and the subjects encompassed by it.
594:WikiProject North Carolina - Durham
306:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
1824:WikiProject United States articles
1521:It occurs to me that Tara Reade's
512:Template:WikiProject United States
25:
1869:B-Class African diaspora articles
1844:B-Class Higher education articles
998:. They were invoked in 2010 when
61:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1774:Mid-importance lacrosse articles
1360:Katz, Neil (February 18, 2010).
898:
880:
810:
800:
779:
717:
699:
635:
614:
554:
449:
439:
408:
340:
319:
288:
258:
228:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
1794:B-Class North Carolina articles
1595:were also in separate edits. --
1544:Tawana Brawley rape allegations
1202:what exactly was your point? —
859:This article has been rated as
839:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
678:This article has been rated as
529:This article has been rated as
387:This article has been rated as
1829:B-Class Crime-related articles
1819:WikiProject Durham NC articles
1814:Low-importance Durham articles
1779:B-Class United States articles
1404:Yamato, Jen (March 12, 2016).
1:
1750:22:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
1586:21:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
1536:04:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
1517:15:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
1293:15:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
1243:05:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
1228:05:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
1213:05:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
1197:21:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
919:and see a list of open tasks.
652:and see a list of open tasks.
591:This article is supported by
567:This article is supported by
370:Template:WikiProject Lacrosse
361:and see a list of open tasks.
53:Put new text under old text.
1764:Old requests for peer review
1701:16:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
1686:17:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
1670:02:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
1655:02:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
1621:04:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
1605:04:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
1571:23:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
1555:19:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
1496:04:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
1331:17:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
1179:05:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
1159:03:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
1144:16:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
1121:15:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
1102:04:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
1081:15:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
1039:02:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
908:WikiProject African diaspora
727:WikiProject Higher education
655:Crime and Criminal Biography
622:Crime and Criminal Biography
1859:Low-importance law articles
1720:06:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
1895:
1460:12:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
1447:08:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
1430:02:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
1263:Shooting of Trayvon Martin
947:project's importance scale
865:project's importance scale
684:project's importance scale
570:WikiProject North Carolina
535:project's importance scale
393:project's importance scale
1769:B-Class lacrosse articles
1347:21:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
1267:Trial of George Zimmerman
1185:O. J. Simpson murder case
944:
931:African diaspora articles
893:
858:
795:
762:Higher education articles
712:
677:
630:
590:
550:
528:
465:WikiProject United States
434:
386:
335:
314:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
1864:WikiProject Law articles
1013:04:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
980:Civil Rights Act of 1871
842:Template:WikiProject Law
746:, and see the project's
470:United States of America
18:Talk:Crystal Gail Mangum
1809:B-Class Durham articles
1041:Just A Passing Reader
664:Crime-related articles
587:
547:
515:United States articles
296:This article is rated
86:avoid personal attacks
1384:(November 22, 2013).
1279:case touched off the
1089:Attorney Mike Nifong.
586:
562:North Carolina portal
546:
300:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
222:Auto-archiving period
111:Neutral point of view
1854:B-Class law articles
1250:in an article's lede
1183:Go read the lede to
457:United States portal
350:WikiProject Lacrosse
116:No original research
1731:Crystal Gail Mangum
1678:HoundofBaskersville
483:Articles Requested!
1390:The New York Times
750:for useful advice.
588:
548:
302:content assessment
266:Duke lacrosse case
97:dispute resolution
58:
36:Duke lacrosse case
1408:. The Daily Beast
961:
960:
957:
956:
953:
952:
875:
874:
871:
870:
774:
773:
770:
769:
748:article guideline
694:
693:
690:
689:
609:
608:
605:
604:
403:
402:
399:
398:
373:lacrosse articles
282:
281:
253:
252:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
1886:
1638:Holocaust_denial
1417:
1415:
1413:
1400:
1398:
1396:
1382:Associated Press
1377:
1375:
1373:
1354:reliable sources
1163:I'm not sure if
1086:It is included:
1059:
1054:
933:
932:
929:
926:
923:
922:African diaspora
913:African diaspora
902:
895:
894:
888:African diaspora
884:
877:
847:
846:
843:
840:
837:
820:
815:
814:
804:
797:
796:
791:
783:
776:
764:
763:
760:
757:
754:
753:Higher education
732:higher education
721:
714:
713:
707:Higher education
703:
696:
666:
665:
662:
659:
656:
639:
632:
631:
626:
618:
611:
564:
559:
558:
557:
517:
516:
513:
510:
507:
459:
454:
453:
452:
443:
436:
435:
430:
427:
412:
405:
375:
374:
371:
368:
365:
344:
337:
336:
331:
323:
316:
299:
293:
292:
284:
262:
255:
247:
233:
232:
223:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
1894:
1893:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1754:
1753:
1727:
1708:
1411:
1409:
1403:
1394:
1392:
1380:
1371:
1369:
1359:
1319:
1241:
1211:
1177:
1142:
1100:
1069:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1055:
1051:
1011:
968:
930:
927:
924:
921:
920:
844:
841:
838:
835:
834:
826:WikiProject Law
816:
809:
789:
761:
758:
755:
752:
751:
663:
660:
657:
654:
653:
624:
560:
555:
553:
514:
511:
508:
505:
504:
503:
489:Become a Member
455:
450:
448:
428:
418:
372:
369:
366:
363:
362:
329:
297:
249:
248:
243:
220:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1892:
1890:
1882:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1756:
1755:
1726:
1723:
1712:86.156.211.130
1707:
1704:
1674:
1608:
1607:
1592:
1558:
1557:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1435:
1433:
1432:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1401:
1378:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1237:
1207:
1173:
1138:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1105:
1104:
1096:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1017:
1007:
967:
964:
959:
958:
955:
954:
951:
950:
943:
937:
936:
934:
917:the discussion
903:
891:
890:
885:
873:
872:
869:
868:
861:Low-importance
857:
851:
850:
848:
822:
821:
805:
793:
792:
790:Low‑importance
784:
772:
771:
768:
767:
765:
722:
710:
709:
704:
692:
691:
688:
687:
680:Low-importance
676:
670:
669:
667:
650:the discussion
640:
628:
627:
625:Low‑importance
619:
607:
606:
603:
602:
599:Low-importance
589:
579:
578:
575:Low-importance
566:
565:
549:
539:
538:
531:Low-importance
527:
521:
520:
518:
502:
501:
496:
491:
486:
479:
477:Template Usage
473:
461:
460:
444:
432:
431:
429:Low‑importance
421:North Carolina
413:
401:
400:
397:
396:
389:Mid-importance
385:
379:
378:
376:
359:the discussion
345:
333:
332:
330:Mid‑importance
324:
312:
311:
305:
294:
280:
279:
263:
251:
250:
241:
239:
238:
235:
234:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1891:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1761:
1759:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1738:
1734:
1732:
1724:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1705:
1703:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1657:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1629:
1623:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1563:Shakehandsman
1556:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1505:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1476:
1475:chiropractics
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1458:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1431:
1428:
1425:
1421:
1407:
1402:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1367:
1363:
1358:
1357:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1334:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1316:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1273:
1272:controversial
1268:
1264:
1260:
1259:Duke Lacrosse
1256:
1252:
1251:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1234:Malik Shabazz
1231:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1205:
1204:Malik Shabazz
1200:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1171:
1170:Malik Shabazz
1166:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1094:
1093:Malik Shabazz
1090:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:98.118.62.140
1067:Lede sentence
1066:
1058:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1005:
1004:Malik Shabazz
1001:
997:
996:a white woman
993:
992:two white men
987:
985:
981:
977:
972:
966:Dubious claim
965:
963:
948:
942:
939:
938:
935:
918:
914:
910:
909:
904:
901:
897:
896:
892:
889:
886:
883:
879:
866:
862:
856:
853:
852:
849:
832:
828:
827:
819:
813:
808:
806:
803:
799:
798:
794:
788:
785:
782:
778:
766:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:
723:
720:
716:
715:
711:
708:
705:
702:
698:
685:
681:
675:
672:
671:
668:
651:
647:
646:
641:
638:
634:
633:
629:
623:
620:
617:
613:
600:
597:(assessed as
596:
595:
585:
581:
580:
576:
573:(assessed as
572:
571:
563:
552:
545:
541:
540:
536:
532:
526:
523:
522:
519:
506:United States
500:
497:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
484:
480:
478:
475:
474:
471:
467:
466:
458:
447:
445:
442:
438:
437:
433:
426:
422:
417:
416:United States
414:
411:
407:
394:
390:
384:
381:
380:
377:
360:
356:
352:
351:
346:
343:
339:
338:
334:
328:
325:
322:
318:
313:
309:
303:
295:
291:
286:
285:
277:
276:
271:
267:
264:
261:
257:
256:
237:
236:
231:
227:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
198:
194:
193:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1739:
1735:
1728:
1709:
1693:Belovedeagle
1689:
1673:
1662:Belovedeagle
1658:
1647:Belovedeagle
1641:
1632:
1627:
1624:
1609:
1578:Belovedeagle
1574:
1559:
1520:
1502:
1434:
1410:. Retrieved
1393:. Retrieved
1389:
1370:. Retrieved
1365:
1335:
1323:Belovedeagle
1320:
1271:
1270:
1249:
1248:
1164:
1070:
1052:
1044:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1016:
988:
973:
969:
962:
906:
860:
845:law articles
824:
736:universities
725:
679:
643:
592:
568:
530:
494:Project Talk
482:
463:
388:
348:
308:WikiProjects
273:
265:
225:
195:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
1725:False title
1468:. Further,
1277:Rodney King
831:legal field
270:peer review
268:received a
159:free images
42:not a forum
1758:Categories
1634:incorrect.
1547:Beauxlieux
1528:Beauxlieux
1509:Beauxlieux
1484:WP:BALANCE
1045:References
818:Law portal
744:discussion
1261:did, the
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
1613:Xurizuri
1597:Xurizuri
1488:Xurizuri
1480:WP:UNDUE
1454:Lagrange
1424:Lagrange
1412:March 9,
1395:March 9,
1372:March 9,
1366:CBS News
1281:LA Riots
1135:MShabazz
740:colleges
364:Lacrosse
355:lacrosse
327:Lacrosse
275:archived
226:180Â days
197:Archives
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
1470:WP:NPOV
863:on the
682:on the
533:on the
391:on the
298:B-class
165:WPÂ refs
153:scholar
1504:Jayx82
1466:WP:SYN
1439:Jayx82
1339:Jayx82
1285:Xerton
1220:Xerton
1189:Xerton
1151:Xerton
1113:Xerton
738:, and
499:Alerts
425:Durham
304:scale.
137:Google
1482:or a
1368:. CBS
1257:did,
1239:Stalk
1209:Stalk
1175:Stalk
1140:Stalk
1098:Stalk
1009:Stalk
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
1746:talk
1716:talk
1697:talk
1682:talk
1666:talk
1651:talk
1617:talk
1601:talk
1582:talk
1567:talk
1551:talk
1532:talk
1513:talk
1492:talk
1443:talk
1414:2019
1397:2019
1374:2019
1343:talk
1327:talk
1289:talk
1255:OJ's
1224:talk
1193:talk
1155:talk
1117:talk
1077:talk
1035:talk
994:and
984:here
976:here
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
1457:613
1427:613
1165:you
941:???
855:Low
836:Law
787:Law
674:Low
525:Low
383:Mid
187:TWL
1760::
1748:)
1718:)
1699:)
1684:)
1668:)
1653:)
1642:if
1640:,
1628:no
1619:)
1611:--
1603:)
1584:)
1569:)
1553:)
1534:)
1515:)
1494:)
1445:)
1388:.
1364:.
1345:)
1333:)
1329:)
1291:)
1283:.
1226:)
1195:)
1157:)
1119:)
1079:)
1037:)
734:,
601:).
577:).
423:/
419::
224::
216:,
212:,
208:,
204:,
167:)
65:;
1744:(
1714:(
1695:(
1680:(
1664:(
1649:(
1615:(
1599:(
1580:(
1565:(
1549:(
1530:(
1511:(
1490:(
1441:(
1416:.
1399:.
1376:.
1341:(
1325:(
1287:(
1265:/
1236:/
1222:(
1206:/
1191:(
1172:/
1153:(
1137:/
1115:(
1095:/
1075:(
1033:(
1006:/
949:.
867:.
686:.
537:.
395:.
310::
218:5
214:4
210:3
206:2
202:1
199::
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.