284:. In the EU, by the way, especially in EU policy stuff, the term 'cultural heritage' seems to be used quite consistently when they mean heritage and when they say cultural resources, they mean it more inclusively. I seem to recall there was a bit of a switch midway in the 5th Framework Programme around about 2000, when they opened up the Information Society Technology Programme and it stopped being about how do we catalogue collections to put them online and started being about research on interchange of cultural assets. I may also be cynical but it could be that the trend by the intellectual capital movement to put an economic value on intangibles (social capital, creative capital, community capital etc), made the politicians start to be interested in the broader definition e.g
287:. Then of course there's inflation in job titles, so instead of advertising for an Art Gallery Manager, they want a Cultural Resources Manager - although maybe that is appropriate because the scope of such a job has probably changed dramatically in the last few years, and probably involves interactive multimedia experinces and being able to put on performance art in the gallery as well as dealing with concept art, not just paintings! In Europe there is a general trend to bring together government responsibilities for culture (heritage as well as arts etc) e.g. France, Ireland, UK,
348:
americans. They are presumably placing a current cultural value on their sites (i.e. place of celebration, sacred etc), not just one of heritage. On the other hand in Europe there are widespread concerns about the integration of cultures of more recent immigrants - as these people are often economically or socially excluded - and making policy decisions about the support and celebration of cultural resources, such as the
160:
135:
22:
71:
53:
547:
many, many elements including heritage management, landscape archeology, digital archaeology, cultural landscapes, traditional cultural properties, and much else. Very eclectic and very difficult to get one's mind around. Nevertheless, it is the bulk of the employment for upwards of 10,000 professionals in this field in the United States.
655:
technical branch thereof. Unless good verifiable evidence can be shown about that usage (I checked the links below, and there is no evidence for it), to the contrary, it seems the UK usage is similar to the US usage (perhaps marginally broader), related solely to cultural heritage, this page needs to be moved or renamed.
631:
Like always, I seem to have flashes of insight right after I post. Renaming the article "cultural resources" or "cultural sector" to focus on the current culture + cultural heritage aspect might be more ideal, and spin off all the heritage issues to their relevant pages, rather than trying to fit all
576:
I've been going around trying to straighten out and make sense of a number of ambiguously overlapping topics in the area of cultural heritage, that due to an inability to establish central definitions for scope and coverage the article (regardless of any definitions external to wikipedia) have become
455:
In the US, the purpose of
Cultural Resource Management is to determine eligibility to the National or State Registers of Historic Places. There are 4 criteria (A through D) for determining eligibility. This is not discussed here. It should be. Developers may want to read about these for projects that
411:
I have moved the following to this talk page - the place for discussion is the talk page not the article. The opening paragaph, and the first and main section of the article already make clear that there are differences in usage of the term. The references using it in the broader sense are
European
593:
more broadly, without any coherent understanding of the concept as distinguished from elsewhere. While I, having dealt with and formally studied these areas, understand that there is a significant interdisciplinary aspect in any discussion of these topics, the amount of overlap and confusion that it
654:
A basic Google search has shown no usage outside of the context of cultural heritage preservation. While they may be cultural resources in a broader sense, and they may be managed, the specific, technical phrase "cultural resource management" appears only in context with cultural heritage, and the
373:
I should have mentioned this earlier, but if the CRM article is being heavily influenced by
European practices, there really should be a reference that is germane to Europe. King's book referenced in the article primarily focuses on the heritage definition of CRM used by the National Park Service.
329:
of CRM.) The reason for this is because the
National Park Service appropriated this term for use with heritage resources. Admittedly, the term cultural heritage management would have been a better definition. My suggestion would be to explain this situation in the article, and the common usage and
347:
Sounds a good idea. I will try to find the time to do it. I wonder if in fact the two positions are so far apart as they might apppear. In Europe we don't have the cultual clash between the indigenous people and incoming
Europeans. The definition of CRM you quoted includes liaison with native
259:
I object to the broad definition of "cultural resource management" to include non-heritage resources. While this term ostensibly could include this broad definition, is it actually used in this manner? Cultural resource management is a term created by the
National Park Service and is specifically
546:
Is it cultural resource management or cultural resources management? I think both terms are being used these days to describe the displine of what used to be called "public archaeology". I've been in that field for 40 years and I think I know a little bit about it. It is diverse and includes
324:
I can see the validity of your argument, and it would seem that there may be a movement to incorporate the arts into cultural resource management. The issue is that, at least in the United States, CRM is intimately associated with historic preservation and archaeology. (For an example see Sonoma
264:
resources. A citation and/or example of the non-heritage use of this term should be in the article or else it needs to be edited to remove its non-heritage references. Knowledge (XXG) should not be used as an advocacy vehicle to change the usage of accepted terminology in professional practice.
222:
I can't see that as a reason to split them, they still share the 'polluter pays principle' and all the issues of privatisation and commercialisation of the profession. If we split them, CRM regimes in other countries would also need their own pages and we wouldn't be able to provide a general
244:
Archeological CRM may be a branch of archeology, and archeologists may tend to think of CRM solely in archeological terms, but CRM itself is much broader. Tacking "and architectual" in the introductory sentence is only of modest help. THPOs play a role in CRM but fit into neither category.
231:
Perhaps we should try to make the information more general and not include any country-specific information? I know this will force us to come up with some lists of activities or processes that vary from country to country, but that might be better than country-specific information.
393:
I have made some structural changes, in particular moved what was CRM in the USA, up to the first section and merged with heritage management under the new title CRM in the heritage context. Also a few other tweaks and references. Hope this is in the direction of consensus!
275:
Well as far as I'm aware it's only in the last few years that it has been used more broadly. Some early digital projects started off being about cultural heritage by digitising museum and archive material but didn't restrict the content to being heritage - for example
606:
stuff to that page. If need be, a new page defining "cultural resources" in the new, broader, not-just-heritage category may be warranted, with the management aspect of it included, and links to the relevant, established pages, rather than duplication here. Thoughts?
294:
which is part of a bigger project to define
National Occupational Standards, which aids in comparison of competencies (such as resource management) across industry sectors. In Education, you can take a BA in Cultural Resources Management at
422:
Users of
Knowledge (XXG) should note that the viewpoint and definition if CRM as presented in this article is based on the definitions used only in England. It does not apply to, and is not relevant to the definition of CRM as used in North
245:
Similarly, association with significant events or the lives of significant persons are reasons for inclusion in the
National Register. I wish I could improve things directly myself, but for now I have only the time to make this assertion.
432:
Should the opening be tweaked so that the commonest use (i.e. synonymous with cultural heritage, in line with the King quote) is discussed first, followed by the usage in the broader sense? The main paragraph in this article
213:
okay guys, maybe we need a different topic for
British CRM and American CRM, because in America it's not just federal projects, it's any federal monies that are paid to support projects that fall under this rule.
594:
can cause, suggests that it may be better served by dividing out the content to relevant places: the narrow definition (the one most incoming article links seem to think this is) seems to be the
713:, and nothing was cited to tie these facts to the CRM process. I'm not a professional, but I read a lot in historic preservation, and I only ever encounter CRM in the context of archaeology.
309:
794:
790:
776:
861:
111:
117:
412:
not just England, and even the definition in the CHM section, which I understand is from King, an american, refers to folklife, orchestras, theatres etc.
856:
166:
140:
87:
577:
tangled messes. This is one of those articles (I mean this in the most civil and descriptive way). To begin, it seems to be a jumbled overlap of
710:
456:
they are starting, and to understand what the CRM professionals are doing, and why. There should also be summaries of the laws. March 2008
78:
58:
554:
772:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
496:
484:
473:
33:
693:
736:
837:
595:
586:
306:
291:
752:
468:
article is a list of possible expansions for that acronym, one of which is this article. It is my belief(based on
793:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
308:. I thought at first it might be another example of usage being divided by the Atlantic, but judging from this
311:
perhaps not. Maybe it's just the case that historical material culture is tangible and hence easier to manage.
39:
21:
828:
744:
558:
528:
Personally I don't think the Customer relationship management is the primary article, but I've commented on
681:
633:
550:
171:
145:
660:
641:
620:
612:
536:
507:
I'd like to have you comment on the issue before I request any changes. I have opened a discussion on the
492:
300:
812:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
800:
603:
582:
349:
86:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
743:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
246:
762:
330:
perception of the term and how it may be evolving to encompass the entire scope of things "cultural".
685:
677:
The article should focus on the US policies as the term CR is not used outside the United States.
518:
709:
I've cut out most of the US section — it basically duplicated the "Nomination process" section of
689:
375:
331:
266:
797:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
304:
813:
718:
656:
637:
616:
608:
599:
578:
532:
442:
413:
395:
353:
312:
233:
374:
What is the equivalent resource used by Europeans that focuses on the broad CRM definition?
820:
842:
722:
697:
664:
645:
624:
562:
540:
522:
445:
416:
398:
378:
356:
334:
315:
269:
249:
779:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
514:
819:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
786:
850:
714:
224:
285:
753:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070207233207/http://www.dkit.ie/display.asp?id=161
83:
159:
134:
785:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
281:
326:
460:
Redirecting CRM to Customer Relationship Management - Request For Comments
529:
508:
756:
598:
page (which would also be the site of a redirect), the broader usage to
296:
590:
407:"Cultural Resources Management" Term Dissagreement: America vs. England
469:
70:
52:
763:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100416204313/http://www.aandb.org.uk/
288:
503:"(Redirected from CRM) For other uses, see CRM (disambiguation)".
488:
480:
465:
15:
435:
Cultural resources management applied to heritage management
766:
472:), that most users who are looking for CRM are looking for
747:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
277:
740:
303:. There are recent research papers and projects e.g.
499:
article will then contain this text under its title:
218:
They are related, but from what I see not the same.
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
789:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
116:This article has not yet received a rating on the
169:, a project which is currently considered to be
476:, and this is a confusing experience for them.
775:This message was posted before February 2018.
280:, others have always been more eclectic e.g.
8:
589:(which in some contexts is called CRM), and
181:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Collections Care
19:
278:Scottish Cultural Resources Access Network
129:
47:
735:I have just modified 2 external links on
572:This page needs help; may warrant merging
255:"broad" definition of CRM -- is it valid?
511:where you can add your opinion. Thanks!
862:Unknown-importance Archaeology articles
131:
96:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Archaeology
49:
439:Management of Cultural Resources Sites
757:http://www.dkit.ie/display.asp?id=161
352:can be an attempt to rebalance this.
184:Template:WikiProject Collections Care
7:
711:National Register of Historic Places
165:This article is within the scope of
76:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
739:. Please take a moment to review
857:Start-Class Archaeology articles
497:Customer relationship management
485:Customer relationship management
474:Customer relationship management
223:introduction to the discipline.
158:
133:
99:Template:WikiProject Archaeology
69:
51:
20:
1:
737:Cultural resources management
698:14:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
615:) 16:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC) (
451:National Register Eligibility
441:in line with the King quote?
292:definition of cultural sector
250:00:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
90:and see a list of open tasks.
596:cultural heritage management
587:Cultural heritage management
428:Possible change of structure
399:20:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
379:14:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
357:17:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
335:04:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
316:20:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
299:and an MA at De Montfort in
270:16:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
167:WikiProject Collections Care
843:10:58, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
723:02:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
541:09:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
523:20:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
446:13:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
417:09:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
878:
806:(last update: 5 June 2024)
732:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
301:European Cultural Planning
118:project's importance scale
665:17:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
646:16:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
632:definitions in here. See
625:16:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
563:23:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
483:article be redirected to
187:Collections Care articles
153:
115:
64:
46:
767:http://www.aandb.org.uk/
227:07:27, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
728:External links modified
479:I'm proposing that the
240:too archeology-oriented
79:WikiProject Archaeology
505:
437:could also be renamed
28:This article is rated
604:historic preservation
583:Historic Preservation
501:
350:Notting Hill Carnival
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
787:regular verification
493:CRM (Disambiguation)
290:. For UK, there's a
282:The European Library
102:Archaeology articles
777:After February 2018
325:State University's
831:InternetArchiveBot
782:InternetArchiveBot
487:, and the current
34:content assessment
807:
701:
684:comment added by
600:cultural heritage
579:Cultural heritage
553:comment added by
491:page be moved to
260:used to identify
203:
202:
199:
198:
195:
194:
128:
127:
124:
123:
869:
841:
832:
805:
804:
783:
700:
678:
565:
189:
188:
185:
182:
179:
178:Collections Care
162:
155:
154:
149:
141:Collections Care
137:
130:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
877:
876:
872:
871:
870:
868:
867:
866:
847:
846:
835:
830:
798:
791:have permission
781:
745:this simple FaQ
730:
707:
679:
675:
574:
548:
515:Kingsley Joseph
462:
453:
430:
409:
257:
242:
211:
186:
183:
180:
177:
176:
143:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
29:
12:
11:
5:
875:
873:
865:
864:
859:
849:
848:
825:
824:
817:
770:
769:
761:Added archive
759:
751:Added archive
729:
726:
706:
703:
674:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
649:
648:
573:
570:
568:
544:
543:
461:
458:
452:
449:
429:
426:
425:
424:
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
340:
339:
338:
337:
319:
318:
256:
253:
241:
238:
229:
228:
217:
210:
207:
205:
201:
200:
197:
196:
193:
192:
190:
163:
151:
150:
138:
126:
125:
122:
121:
114:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
874:
863:
860:
858:
855:
854:
852:
845:
844:
839:
834:
833:
822:
818:
815:
811:
810:
809:
802:
796:
792:
788:
784:
778:
773:
768:
764:
760:
758:
754:
750:
749:
748:
746:
742:
738:
733:
727:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
704:
702:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
672:
666:
662:
658:
653:
652:
651:
650:
647:
643:
639:
635:
634:WP:DICTIONARY
630:
629:
628:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
605:
601:
597:
592:
588:
584:
580:
571:
569:
566:
564:
560:
556:
555:204.76.196.11
552:
542:
538:
534:
531:
530:CRM Talk page
527:
526:
525:
524:
520:
516:
512:
510:
509:CRM Talk page
504:
500:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
477:
475:
471:
467:
459:
457:
450:
448:
447:
444:
440:
436:
427:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
406:
400:
397:
392:
391:
390:
389:
380:
377:
376:Tous ensemble
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
358:
355:
351:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
336:
333:
332:Tous ensemble
328:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
314:
310:
307:
305:
302:
298:
293:
289:
286:
283:
279:
274:
273:
272:
271:
268:
267:Tous ensemble
263:
254:
252:
251:
248:
239:
237:
235:
234:ASchoenhofer
226:
221:
220:
219:
215:
208:
206:
191:
174:
173:
168:
164:
161:
157:
156:
152:
147:
142:
139:
136:
132:
119:
113:
110:
109:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
829:
826:
801:source check
780:
774:
771:
734:
731:
708:
680:— Preceding
676:
657:Morgan Riley
638:Morgan Riley
627:: typo fix)
617:Morgan Riley
609:Morgan Riley
575:
567:
549:— Preceding
545:
533:Viv Hamilton
513:
506:
502:
478:
464:The current
463:
454:
443:Viv Hamilton
438:
434:
431:
414:Viv Hamilton
410:
396:Viv Hamilton
354:Viv Hamilton
313:Viv Hamilton
261:
258:
247:64.105.60.62
243:
236:30 Oct 2005
230:
216:
212:
204:
170:
77:
40:WikiProjects
93:Archaeology
84:Archaeology
59:Archaeology
30:Start-class
851:Categories
838:Report bug
705:US section
673:US centric
602:, and the
327:definition
821:this tool
814:this tool
827:Cheers.—
694:contribs
686:Arebenti
682:unsigned
551:unsigned
470:searches
423:America.
262:heritage
225:adamsan
209:Untitled
172:inactive
146:inactive
741:my edit
715:Nyttend
591:culture
297:Dundalk
495:. The
36:scale.
719:talk
690:talk
661:talk
642:talk
621:talk
613:talk
559:talk
537:talk
519:talk
795:RfC
765:to
755:to
489:CRM
481:CRM
466:CRM
112:???
853::
808:.
803:}}
799:{{
721:)
696:)
692:•
663:)
644:)
636:.
623:)
585:,
581:,
561:)
539:)
521:)
840:)
836:(
823:.
816:.
717:(
688:(
659:(
640:(
619:(
611:(
557:(
535:(
517:(
276:.
175:.
148:)
144:(
120:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
