176:
158:
658:: Having read your criticism, I think you missed the point of having an article. The purpose of an article is to describe the term and conpept, its history, meaning, methods of research and of course - criticism. If you went through Brown's book you will find generous discussion of "almost-universals" and "dependent-universals". You'll also find the methods of research taken, along with a discussion why, given the sheer number of cultures and societies, finding isolated exceptions do not merit removing it from the universals. The article is seriously lacking - and thus misleading - in presenting a clear idea what human universals are and also what they are NOT. To merge the criticism into each and every universal (and there IS criticism) makes no sense - the criticism should have its defined place, and not only "this and that universal is not universal", but also the criticism over the research methods, which definitely exists.
492:
the existence of true matriarchies is denied by many anthropologists โ according to a certain definition of matriarchy, at least โ, the existence of matrilinear, matrilocal or egalitarian societies seems to be uncontroversial, and in any case, the formula of "male domination" hides a lot of complexity in male/female relations), but listing universal male dominance as uncontested fact here is severely intellectually dishonest. Anyway, it's the exceptions that matter: one should think that it is unnecessary to point out that a single unexpected counterexample is more telling and important than thousands of confirming examples in science, through its potential to spur new insight, so it is imperative to focus on exceptions. --
964:
ethics, ethno-botany, etiquette, faith healing, family feasting, fire-making, folklore, food taboos, funeral rites, games, gestures, gift-giving, government, greetings, hair styles, hospitality, housing, hygiene, incest taboos, inheritance rules, joking, kin groups, kinship nomenclature, language, law, luck superstitions, magic, marriage, mealtimes, medicine, obstetrics, penal sanctions, personal names, population policy, postnatal care, pregnancy usages, property rights, propitiation of supernatural beings, puberty customs, religious ritual, residence rules, sexual restrictions, soul concepts, status differentiation, surgery, tool-making, trade, visiting, weather control, weaving. "
818:
gender roles are actually detrimental (they reduce flexibility) and a luxury only cultures used to abundance of resources can (but need not) afford. Technological evolution, as a form of cultural evolution, again dating back millions of years, provides us with additional (artificial) body parts, so to speak, in the form of tools, and even extensions of our brains, and additionally broadens and expands the limits of any "biological programming". Therefore, the root idea behind "cultural universals" is not very helpful, or at least they should not be taken as normative in any way, "what human cultures should be like", let alone "can only be like". --
617:
respective authors and critics properly raised where it should: either at authors level if specific concerns can be raised (e.g. methodological issues raised by other scholars, strong bias of the authors, etc.), at universals level (e.g. studies dis-proofing the universality claim) or at the whole concept idea of cultural universals (e.g. systemic/cultural biases of universality claims). But proceeding as such, someone interested in the notion of cultural universals or some specific list will find the different views, but will find as well due concerns about such "universals".
513:===== I have never before heard the assertion that Tasmanians did not have, or else "lost", the ability to make fire. While not really the point of your, admittedly very old, comment, such an assertion is likely to be viewed as highly offensive by any person from the Tasmanian Aboriginal community who comes across it, even on a talk page. While clearly not intended that way, it echoes and builds on the decades of cultural denigration inflicted on Tasmanian Aboriginals. My understanding, as a Tasmanian, is that local Aboriginal people traditionally
74:
53:
347:
329:
1117:
expand the sources and change the tone (and possibly title) of the article. If not, maybe just a few examples given by
Murdock or Brown and the list of 67 Human Universals could be moved to that book's page. A criticism section is only required if there are valid sources that criticize the idea. These might not exist if the idea isn't seriously considered by academia, but does not imply a lack of neutrality.
84:
1018:
or institution or theme is found in all cultures is not to point to a vacuous factor by any means. And by definition a cultural universal does not imply anything unique about a single culture. I am suggesting here that the sentence be removed because, unless the sentence's author can document the use of "empty" universal in the social science literature, it is inapplicable to the topic.
22:
517:, as the usually damp environment and vegetation, year-round, in most areas of Tasmania, made fire-starting an arduous task. This labour-saving tactic did not mean they could not make fire afresh! Aboriginal peoples could not have survived in what is a very cold region for thousands of years, without being able to start fire when necessary. Please consider revising this remark.
261:
240:
707:
family of ancient Egypt was based on it. One way or the other, this article is a disgrace for what I see as an important idea. I just don't have the energy to bring it to a proper state. It SHOULD contain the history of the idea, and that's going back as far as the Bible and
Aristotle, and a very interesting turning point at in the 17th century.
1044:
1010:
357:
1222:... and anthropological research ethics slows the studies down so that other groups unbound by such ethics, often at least locally represented by people of the same skin color as the supposedly isolated tribe ... reach the tribe before the anthropologists do, no truly uncontacted culture has ever been scientifically studied.
963:
There are sixty-seven universals in the list: age-grading, athletic sports, bodily adornment, calendar, cleanliness training, community organization, cooking, cooperative labor, cosmology, courtship, dancing, decorative art, divination, division of labor, dream interpretation, education, eschatology,
893:
These
Universals cast a shadow over questions such a s wars, racism and fascism. The fact that the "others" (identified by skin color, language, beliefs and even clothing style )are accepted with suspicion or outright hostility may imply these traits may be the drive behind their modern counterparts.
616:
I agree with you, but I think it is a matter of clarifying the structure of the article. In the previous version of the article, headings may indicate Brown list was THE cultural universals list. I think the article would be stronger if many views would be presented as hypothesize and argued by their
920:
So the article still says "among the cultural universals listed by Brown (1991) are", as I have put it when I first built it years ago. But people took liberties with the list, just altering, adding or removing stuff. To put it bluntly, this is vandalism, because the article now attributes to Brown
482:
are well-known for lacking (or having lacked) the ability to make fire. (That they would seem to have lost it secondarily is really irrelevant for the purpose of such a list, which does not, after all, present an historical perspective.) Kibbutzim present a famous counter-example to the existence of
1116:
I'm wondering if the neutrality tag is the best fit compared to a stub issue. I would like to see an expert give an origin or history of the term, and most importantly a relevance to any modern fields of study. If this page is to contain a list of proposed cultural universals then I agree we should
1017:
I think we need to discuss the inclusion of the sentence tacked on to the end of this piece which refers to "empty universals". The latter is a philosophical concept which, IMHO, does not apply here. Who in social science refers to cultural universals as "empty"? To say that a structure or trait
789:
Since I believe that the truth is somewhere in the middle, I prefer the softer version... The way I think it is, humans are biologically programmed with limited set of cultural options, but within those options there is still room for differences. So both "human almost universals" AND the existence
491:
article indicates that "certain Pygmy tribes found in Africa" and the Vedda of Sri Lanka were also counterexamples to claims of university for religious beliefs in general. Gender relations and matriarchy are a hotly debated issue, of course, so I won't go into it (though I may point out that while
465:
At least in some cases, I know there are documented exceptions, so these alleged universals are not really all universals, and the list is dubious and misleading. (Reminds me of linguistic universals, by the way, where exceptions also tend to occur in many cases, but are often played down or simply
729:
he explicitly claims that his universals are intended to be truly universal, that is, to have no known exceptions. Once an exception is found, the alleged universal can therefore only be definitely judged as disproved. (For example, I can think of a well-known exception to the "black/white (basic)
897:
However, there is quite a distance between the tribal level (as proved in the
Universals) and the modern phenomena. The fact humans did manage to form societies three magnitudes larger than tribes implies that many adaptations occurred, and it's possible this Universals are not the cause, and the
817:
there was some "biological" (presumably genetic) factor that made humans prefer patriarchal structures that doesn't mean that they provide relevant limits on what human cultures can be like. Rather, our main "biological programming" is flexibility and adaptability, and (just as an example) strict
706:
Brown has an answer to this argument. However, I neither agree nor disagree. Human
Universals (the book) was a very interesting reading, and definitely refreshing after the Relativism indoctrination I got while in college. The truth, I suspect, is somewhere in the middle. As for incest, the royal
445:
Please provide more material/source to based your remark. As well, we should keep in mind that it is an hypothesis in some fields and some thinkers have written about it. Therefore, while the universality claims of any item on this page may be contested (and I think anyone strongly suggest you to
1074:
This appears to have been a theory vaguely cobbled together by sociologists which may be pseudoscience. It is not wikpedia's job to establish if it is pseudoscience, but there is quite a bit here and very little to verify it, and does not contain a section on discussions of the veracity of such
756:
I can only vouch you that in the book itself, Brown does discuss "almost-universals" and (under "research methods") seem to me to lessen the dogmatic tone. All in all this is quite similar to "nature vs. nurture", in the society scale instead of the personal. Most likely it will converge to some
987:
Many authors wrote about cultural universals. May it be better if, instead of having one list as now, current list would be clearly identified as Brown's list and other lists/hypothesis would be added? I clearly identified with a new heading the current list is based on Brown, but an additional
804:
What you describe as "biological programming" certainly exists in humans, but biological (genetic, DNA-based) evolution, due to its slowness, has (for millions of years) been superseded by cultural (brain- and learning-based) evolution, which allows for much more rapid adaptation to changing
850:
Personally, I think that racism is an abomination. The fact that it's probably one of the universals doesn't change my mind at all. My judgment is one thing, the universal facts are another thing altogether. The article deals with the facts behind The
Universals theory, not with judgment.
939:
Agreed. It needs to be attributed to correct researcher and "extra" additions that were added need to be removed. I don't have original list. A lot of the additions are patent nonsense - attributes that most mammals and even some insects have! Hardly unique human cultural universals!
599:
Looking at the history, I've found that some entries on the list, including not only patriarchy, but also marriage and sexual jealousy, have been challenged, too. So yeah, even if the list may now accurately reflect the source, it is better taken with a few grains of salt at least.
175:
157:
483:
incest taboos, and I have also seen the
Alutiiq of Kodiak Island discussed in that context. Rape is not always proscribed and accepted in some cases โ even ancient Greek heroes are portrayed as perpetrating it, with no indication of it being wrong. The
847:. Should is value driven, not facts-driven. It is out of the scope of the discussion as it has nothing to do with science. Moral judgment is one thing, scientific facts are another. Morally most people say cancer must not exist, scientifically it does.
1329:
The title "Cultural
Universals" is misleading. If it's cultural it's learned (from other people), but many of the traits listed are good candidates for evolved adaptations, as the article notes. "Human Universals" would be much
1224:" There are quite a few assertions nested into these lines! The reference given does not, on my reading, support what this main sentence asserts. For all I know, it may be true, but I think it at least needs a better source.
1243:
Thank you for pointing this out. I have removed the sentence; for another reason, that journal does not appear to be in a relevant academic field. Incorrect material lingering for years is not uncommon on
Knowledge (XXG).
446:
provide researches invalidating those claims), it is still valid to have an article talking about this concept, overviewing the various hypothesis and raising the various oppositions/critics to those universality claims.
1261:
for your response and making that change (and for your welcome to me). I thought it was a very strange type of journal to rely upon for an anthropological point, but glad to have someone more experienced confirm.
573:
Itโs not all that mysterious. I recently asked my aunt โ an
Aboriginal woman who grew up in Tasmania, but is not of Tasmanian descent โ about this practice, and she was immediately able to describe the process to
222:
1228:, it remains unchanged and unchallenged, so that gives me pause, as maybe I just don't understand the topic well enough? Could someone more knowledgeable about the topic please look at this?
957:"On the universals of culture (cf. George P. Murdock in Linton, The Science of Man in the World Crisis , a concept that was updated by Donald E. Brown, Human Universals ):
836:
be rejected. IF the idea you presented - that the flexibility is the main programming, THAN there would scarcely be universals, BUT this is not the case SO flexibility is
906:
856:
795:
762:
712:
663:
642:
1368:
431:
One would think in an article about universals, there would be atleast one universal? I can not see a single thing listed that is indeed universal, Or even close to it.
216:
988:
verification of list integrity should be done and additional candidate lists should be included. As this is not my field of expertise, I will let other people do it.
1393:
403:
409:
140:
1358:
130:
311:
577:
I suspect itโs the selective cultural memory of *white* Australia that has made this crude, racist stereotype ubiquitous amongโฆ certain kinds of people.
742:
is not white, but red.) I don't think universalists are necessarily any less dogmatic than relativists, and they may have their own political biases. --
192:
1378:
1363:
301:
1398:
570:
The Tasmanian means of fire-making โ the so-called โpercussive methodโ โ has been successfully performed by an anthropologist in at least one case.
379:
1388:
520:(I know nothing of the Andamanese, but at least their case is, prima facie, plausible, given the Andaman Islands are much warmer than Tasmania!)
106:
1353:
692:
the claim may have to be qualified. In any case: if a claimed universal has exceptions, it's not really a universal, only a strong tendency. --
1383:
277:
183:
163:
1373:
557:
432:
868:: Perhaps it's a good idea to add "implications" section to each universals category. I.e. in a section about intra-culturs universals add
1263:
1229:
370:
334:
1076:
521:
97:
58:
790:
of rare exceptions do provide strong evidence that this is the indeed case, much similar to "nature vs. nurture" for individuals.
1158:
2. Why are you removing the existing hatnote and replacing it with a "see also"? Such links go under the "See also" heading, per
1090:
Expert attention is always welcome but regarding "vaguely cobbled together by sociologists": the concept is most associated with
268:
245:
33:
1293:
1220:
make sense? The first sentence of the second para, in particular, seems unclear, and makes a rather strong claim, as in: "
1091:
722:
832:
This way of thinking is refuted empirically. We're talking science, so once an idea does not match empirical evidence it
924:
You are perfectly free to change or expand the list, but each change must be attributed to some specific source. --
823:
780:
771:
Strong claims are preferrable, though, as their falsifiability is better. In science, the ability to be wrong is a
747:
731:
697:
637:?? Where the #### did this came from? This is pure nonsense. I hope the rest of your arguments are better sounded.
605:
497:
487:
provide a counterexample to the claim of universality for creation myths (among other things), and the lede to the
1027:
993:
622:
451:
1019:
561:
436:
39:
1335:
1267:
1233:
1060:
525:
21:
1080:
1023:
989:
655:
618:
447:
1201:
1122:
819:
776:
743:
693:
689:
651:
631:
601:
544:
514:
493:
378:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
276:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
191:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1174:
551:
902:
852:
791:
758:
708:
659:
638:
1022:
00:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC) There is no more mention of empty universal. This talk is then irrelevant.
479:
1159:
578:
929:
582:
1331:
1217:
1056:
975:
945:
681:
556:
Really offensive assertion - should not be here: "Well known"? Only as a false, racist re-write
488:
1144:
775:
thing. Absolute universals are also more scientifically interesting than "almost-universals". --
1100:
475:
362:
73:
52:
1170:
1197:
1118:
726:
484:
1258:
1246:
1183:
1166:
925:
89:
1347:
971:
941:
1095:
677:
188:
1143:
are you adding a source about squirrels that does not mention culture at all? See
1055:
and the biggest problem is that there is no page for the actual word "shelter".--
813:) and we can actually rise beyond them to a large extent. So, for example, even
346:
328:
685:
635:"Kibbutzim present a famous counter-example to the existence of incest taboos"
375:
352:
83:
79:
1339:
1271:
1252:
1237:
1205:
1189:
1126:
1105:
1084:
1064:
1031:
997:
979:
949:
933:
910:
860:
827:
799:
784:
766:
751:
716:
701:
667:
646:
626:
609:
586:
565:
529:
501:
455:
440:
102:
1152:
1052:
273:
260:
239:
970:
Note that "linguistics" isn't noted. Somebody went off kilter there.
1196:
I'm sorry but your tone is too hostile for me to respond too.
15:
901:
Problem is, this phrase may fall under "original research".
1294:"Continuing professional development in sensitive cultures"
1094:, an anthropologist, who wrote a whole book about it. โ
1225:
1133:
474:
is much more enlightening, I'd say.) For example, the
684:
and expressed myself poorly. As for fire-making, see
676:
It's been six years, but I was probably referring to
374:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
272:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
187:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
466:ignored by the universal-hunters. But research on
408:This article has not yet received a rating on the
221:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1155:. They have no relevance whatsoever to this page.
734:. According to Berlin and Kay, the prototype of
805:environments. Therefore the cultural factors (
8:
1173:is on you to get consensus for your edits.
757:in-between approach as research develops.
323:
234:
152:
47:
19:
1369:Unknown-importance Anthropology articles
201:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anthropology
1301:International Family Medicine Education
1284:
325:
236:
154:
49:
1394:Unknown-importance psychology articles
515:carried coals with them to start fires
388:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
921:(1991) what is not in Brown (1991).
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology
7:
1292:Huntington, Mark K. (January 2008).
368:This article is within the scope of
266:This article is within the scope of
181:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
286:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Culture
38:It is of interest to the following
1359:High-importance sociology articles
1181:of your edit is policy compliant.
1177:and the rest do not apply because
1051:I have been fixing the disamb for
898:cause should be sought elsewhere.
809:) dwarf the "biological" factors (
14:
204:Template:WikiProject Anthropology
1379:High-importance culture articles
1364:Stub-Class Anthropology articles
1042:
1008:
355:
345:
327:
259:
238:
174:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
1399:WikiProject Psychology articles
843:This must not be confused with
738:is black, but the prototype of
391:Template:WikiProject Psychology
306:This article has been rated as
135:This article has been rated as
1389:Stub-Class psychology articles
118:Template:WikiProject Sociology
1:
1354:Stub-Class sociology articles
1127:02:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
954:Here's a list I had (copied):
911:12:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
861:08:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
828:17:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
800:17:19, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
785:23:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
767:10:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
752:22:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
723:Donald Brown (anthropologist)
717:17:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
702:12:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
668:06:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
647:06:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
610:00:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
502:14:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
382:and see a list of open tasks.
280:and see a list of open tasks.
195:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1384:WikiProject Culture articles
1206:00:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
1190:03:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
1106:06:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
1085:05:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
587:12:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
511:Original Tasmanians and fire
289:Template:WikiProject Culture
1374:Stub-Class culture articles
1340:00:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
1003:Notion of "empty universal"
730:colour terms" one too: the
441:09:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
1415:
1272:11:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
1253:04:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
1238:05:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
1226:Since its addition in 2015
1070:Expert needed Anthropology
980:01:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
950:01:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
732:Grand Valley Dani language
721:According to our articles
410:project's importance scale
312:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
1065:21:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
934:17:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
566:09:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
530:08:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
407:
340:
305:
254:
220:
169:
134:
67:
46:
1212:Non-nativist explanation
1032:10:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
998:10:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
627:10:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
456:10:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
184:WikiProject Anthropology
427:Where is the universals
1169:your material in. The
916:Fiddling with the list
688:, although in view of
371:WikiProject Psychology
28:This article is rated
840:the main programming.
652:User:Florian Blaschke
632:User:Florian Blaschke
207:Anthropology articles
98:WikiProject Sociology
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
480:Tasmanian Aborigines
1020:Charles D. Laughlin
656:User:MaximeH-ULaval
394:psychology articles
269:WikiProject Culture
1112:Neutrality vs Stub
1075:claims(criticism).
489:History of atheism
121:sociology articles
34:content assessment
1223:
1165:You need to stop
1104:
932:
424:
423:
420:
419:
416:
415:
363:Psychology portal
322:
321:
318:
317:
233:
232:
229:
228:
151:
150:
147:
146:
1406:
1317:
1316:
1314:
1312:
1298:
1289:
1251:
1221:
1188:
1098:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1016:
1012:
1011:
928:
820:Florian Blaschke
777:Florian Blaschke
744:Florian Blaschke
727:Human Universals
694:Florian Blaschke
602:Florian Blaschke
555:
548:
545:Florian Blaschke
494:Florian Blaschke
396:
395:
392:
389:
386:
365:
360:
359:
358:
349:
342:
341:
331:
324:
294:
293:
292:culture articles
290:
287:
284:
263:
256:
255:
250:
242:
235:
223:importance scale
209:
208:
205:
202:
199:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1344:
1343:
1327:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1310:
1308:
1296:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1259:User:Crossroads
1245:
1214:
1182:
1114:
1072:
1043:
1041:
1039:
1009:
1007:
1005:
918:
891:
549:
542:
463:
429:
393:
390:
387:
384:
383:
361:
356:
354:
308:High-importance
291:
288:
285:
282:
281:
249:Highโimportance
248:
206:
203:
200:
197:
196:
137:High-importance
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
62:Highโimportance
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1412:
1410:
1402:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1346:
1345:
1326:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1193:
1192:
1163:
1156:
1137:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1071:
1068:
1038:
1035:
1024:MaximeH-ULaval
1004:
1001:
990:MaximeH-ULaval
985:
984:
983:
982:
961:
960:
959:
958:
955:
917:
914:
890:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
848:
841:
673:
672:
671:
670:
629:
619:MaximeH-ULaval
613:
612:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
575:
571:
558:122.105.31.155
535:
534:
533:
532:
518:
462:
459:
448:MaximeH-ULaval
433:210.185.16.176
428:
425:
422:
421:
418:
417:
414:
413:
406:
400:
399:
397:
380:the discussion
367:
366:
350:
338:
337:
332:
320:
319:
316:
315:
304:
298:
297:
295:
278:the discussion
264:
252:
251:
243:
231:
230:
227:
226:
219:
213:
212:
210:
193:the discussion
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
90:Society portal
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1411:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1349:
1342:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:Paulhummerman
1324:
1306:
1302:
1295:
1288:
1285:
1281:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:49.177.64.138
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:49.177.64.138
1227:
1219:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1111:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1057:Mynameisnotpj
1054:
1049:
1036:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1015:
1002:
1000:
999:
995:
991:
981:
977:
973:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
956:
953:
952:
951:
947:
943:
938:
937:
936:
935:
931:
927:
922:
915:
913:
912:
908:
904:
899:
895:
888:
867:
864:
863:
862:
858:
854:
849:
846:
842:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
825:
821:
816:
812:
808:
803:
802:
801:
797:
793:
788:
787:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
768:
764:
760:
755:
754:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
728:
724:
720:
719:
718:
714:
710:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
636:
633:
630:
628:
624:
620:
615:
614:
611:
607:
603:
598:
597:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
569:
568:
567:
563:
559:
553:
546:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
512:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
490:
486:
485:Pirahรฃ people
481:
477:
473:
469:
460:
458:
457:
453:
449:
443:
442:
438:
434:
426:
411:
405:
402:
401:
398:
381:
377:
373:
372:
364:
353:
351:
348:
344:
343:
339:
336:
333:
330:
326:
313:
309:
303:
300:
299:
296:
279:
275:
271:
270:
265:
262:
258:
257:
253:
247:
244:
241:
237:
224:
218:
215:
214:
211:
194:
190:
186:
185:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1328:
1309:. Retrieved
1304:
1300:
1287:
1279:
1247:
1218:this section
1215:
1184:
1178:
1167:edit warring
1148:
1147:. Squirrels
1140:
1115:
1092:Donald Brown
1077:96.55.138.35
1073:
1047:
1040:
1013:
1006:
986:
962:
923:
919:
900:
896:
892:
889:Implications
865:
844:
837:
833:
814:
810:
806:
772:
739:
735:
634:
552:175.34.114.0
522:175.34.114.0
510:
471:
467:
464:
444:
430:
369:
307:
267:
198:Anthropology
189:Anthropology
182:
164:Anthropology
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1198:DHHornfeldt
1175:WP:CAUGHTUP
1119:DHHornfeldt
903:ืืืื ืฉืืขืื ื
866:Added later
853:ืืืื ืฉืืขืื ื
792:ืืืื ืฉืืขืื ื
759:ืืืื ืฉืืขืื ื
709:ืืืื ืฉืืขืื ื
660:ืืืื ืฉืืขืื ื
639:ืืืื ืฉืืขืื ื
1348:Categories
1307:(1): 52โ54
1280:References
1257:Thank you
1248:Crossroads
1185:Crossroads
1160:WP:SEEALSO
1132:Regarding
476:Andamanese
461:Exceptions
385:Psychology
376:Psychology
335:Psychology
30:Stub-class
579:Foxmilder
472:rarissima
112:Sociology
103:sociology
59:Sociology
1311:23 March
1145:WP:SYNTH
972:Student7
942:Student7
1330:better.
1171:WP:ONUS
1153:culture
1053:Shelter
1037:Shelter
807:nurture
310:on the
283:Culture
274:culture
246:Culture
139:on the
1149:do not
845:should
811:nature
509:=====
36:scale.
1325:Title
1297:(PDF)
1216:Does
1151:have
1336:talk
1313:2021
1268:talk
1234:talk
1202:talk
1179:none
1134:this
1123:talk
1101:talk
1081:talk
1061:talk
1048:Done
1028:talk
1014:Done
994:talk
976:talk
946:talk
930:(๐ณ)
907:talk
857:talk
834:must
824:talk
796:talk
781:talk
773:good
763:talk
748:talk
740:mola
736:mili
725:and
713:talk
698:talk
690:this
686:here
682:this
680:and
678:this
664:talk
654:and
643:talk
623:talk
606:talk
583:talk
562:talk
526:talk
498:talk
478:and
470:and
468:rara
452:talk
437:talk
302:High
131:High
1141:Why
1139:1.
1096:Joe
926:dab
838:not
574:me.
404:???
217:???
1350::
1338:)
1305:40
1303:.
1299:.
1270:)
1236:)
1204:)
1125:)
1083:)
1063:)
1030:)
996:)
978:)
948:)
909:)
859:)
826:)
815:if
798:)
783:)
765:)
750:)
715:)
700:)
666:)
645:)
625:)
608:)
600:--
585:)
564:)
528:)
500:)
454:)
439:)
1334:(
1315:.
1266:(
1232:(
1200:(
1162:.
1136::
1121:(
1103:)
1099:(
1079:(
1059:(
1026:(
992:(
974:(
944:(
905:(
855:(
822:(
794:(
779:(
761:(
746:(
711:(
696:(
662:(
641:(
621:(
604:(
581:(
560:(
554::
550:@
547::
543:@
524:(
496:(
450:(
435:(
412:.
314:.
225:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
