Talk:Czech language - Knowledge (XXG)

616: 595: 2276:

either, in North/East Moravian y can be further back than i, then some Silesian dialects don't distinguish long from short vowels at all... for simplicity's sake this should probably focus on the standard pronunciation outside the sections that focus on the other variants. I do think we should mention that ř can be both voiced and unvoiced, and also that /x/ and /ɦ/ make a pair (as this isn't mentioned and it's not entirely intuitive). Both of these factoids are sourceable from the IPA handbook.

457: 1553:

and also "dodělat". One thing I can be sure of is that -ovat, -ávat verbs are imperfective, not perfective, so the longer infinitive ending is added to the perfective stem, e.g. koupit, prodat (perfective) become kupovat, prodávat (imperfective). Imperfective verbs can also have these stems added too, e.g. dělat → dělávat, as can perfective verbs with prefixes e.g. "vyhledávat", which has a different meaning to both "hledat" and "vyhledat". I'm not sure how best to explain it. –

626: 2900:" is highly debatable. English has a number of constructions that can be used to talk about the future, such as modal verbs ("will", "shall", "might"), periphrastic constructions ("be to", "be going to", "be about to"), the present continuous (be+ing), and the present simple, when the context is obvious. Czech by contrast does have a morphological future tense, so the claim that Czech's use of "future tense" is similar to English is flawed from the off. 2001:". Unfortunately, the issue is much more complex, since also unvoiced consonants are voiced when followed by voiced consonants with unvoiced counterparts (Standard Czech + mostly the Bohemian varieties), or when followed by voiced consonants in general (that is, including the sonorants; mostly in the Moravian varieties). Moreover, this phenomenon, known as voice assimilation, also takes place at word boundaries, so that <dost bylo: --> 2463:

parts of the country (again: with many buts). If I have some time tomorrow, I'll try to give you a more comprehensive answer. Anyway, the impression that OČ is the dominant vernacular is objectionable, because it really depends on the sociological domains and language functions. I, for one, commonly switch between OČ, SŠ/HČ and my own lect depending on whom I speak to, the context, environment, situation. More to share tomorrow! ;) --

219: 1253:"Czech is one of the most highly inflected languages in the world" - again, is that explicitly stated in a source which discusses "world languages?" It sounds like the sort of thing a Czech person would say but I find it dubious, even in Europe, Finnish Estonian and Hungarian have a whole load more cases and verb forms than Slavic languages, and I'd wager some of those Native American languages and Georgian outclass even them. – 511: 789: 771: 725: 700: 490: 266: 2509:

piece of writing, a written document). "Spisovná čeština" is (or should be) translated as "Literary Czech", hence "hovorová čeština" could be translated as "Spoken Literary Czech". Some people use "Colloquial Czech" instead, but that should be restricted to non-standard language. "Spoken Literary Czech" is the spoken "version" of "Literary Czech". I hope I haven't blurred the picture even more for you. :))--

521: 448: 367: 2911:

says is "The Czech past tense may correspond to any of the past-tense forms of English, e.g. ‘he did’, ‘he was doing’, ‘he has done’, ‘he has been doing’ etc." This isn't quite the same as what was stated, and even that is in a chapter before he introduces aspect, which can make a couple of these distinctions, e.g. between "I wrote a book" and "I was writing a book" (see p149).

1380:! So, if you haven't seen, someone's picked up the review and, while he likes it overall, he's made kind of an odd complaint: that there aren't enough sources numerically, not specifying that anything in particular needs further corroboration. Any ideas on how I might deal with this to his liking, while we wait for a native speaker to chime in on the way aspect is described? 1067:. If you trimmed down the intro significantly, corroborated a few unsourced statements, and formatted a few of the sources, it would look like GA material to me. Anyway, this page is definitely coming along, if I do say so myself. Are you still interested in contributing/correcting information about Czech dialects here, or should I handle that myself? 2411:? Or are they just different ways of describing standard vernacular from different eras? This article prescribes the viewpoint that OČ is the standard vernacular in most of the country, but some sources seem to dismissively hand-wave it away. Komárek (2012) p117 dedicates a mere two sentences to it under the heading "tzv. obecná čeština": 1024: 3086:‘but’ ; this last constraint applies much less in Slovak). It may also be occupied by a subject pronoun, which will be there for emphasis, since subject pronouns are not normally required, person being adequately expressed in the verb, even in the past tense, thanks to the use of auxiliaries (unlike in Russian). 2812:í vowel shifts are part of the standard language and b) they happened in the 18th century, both of which are false. And it is surely not a "morphological shift" but a phonological one. Does anyone have access to the source cited, Chloupek, Jan; Nekvapil, Jiří (1993). Studies in Functional Stylistics? – 2258:

non-native speaker of English, I sometimes find it difficult to formulate things in a concise manner. And as a phonetician, I sometimes tend to use terminology that might be too opaque and discouraging to laypeople. I feel that's something that needs to be avoided to keep Knowledge (XXG) readable. :) --

2462:

is really an inter-dialect rather than a true dialect, since it's actually a (sub)set of features (mostly morphological, from the synchronic perspective) that are shared by many speakers of Czech in all of Bohemia and western parts of Moravia, but is considered substandard, displeasing even, in other

2910:

Czech does not always use the past tense to represent the English present perfect - there are cases where the imperfective present is used. For example "bydlím v Praze 10 let" means "I've lived/been living in Prague for 10 years", as this is an ongoing action upto the present. What Naughton actually

2582:

For what it's worth, I looked in Hannan (1996) and was merely reminded of how complicated the question is of whether the Polish spoken in Zaolzie nowadays is really "Polish" or if it can be seen as belonging to both Polish and Czech as per the classification of Belič, Kellner etc... but I suppose my

2415:

The so-called "obecná čeština", which can be seen as an intersection of "hovorová čeština" and regional dialects, is a levelled interdialect which resulted from the dominant influence of the Central Bohemian dialect, and from which local dialectal features restricted to certain parts of Bohemia have

1671:

I'd like to add that perfective verbs only have the past and FUTURE tense, not present. For example: dělám (I am doing/making, I do/make), dodělám (I will finish/I will have finished). If this is cited from Naughton 2005, I suppose the source has it wrong. But I don't have the confidence to edit the

1552:

The stuff about aspect in the verbs section needs attention from a learned native speaker and possibly better sources. I'm not sure it's as simple as all verbs coming in pairs with either prefix or suffix. One imperfective verb often has many perfective derivatives, for instance "dělat" has "udělat"

1399:

lying around the house (which is the Czech Language Institute's authority on orthography) and just double checked the whole orthography section against it and added a few more cites from it. All I have time for tonight I think. To be honest I don't think we need to do this for the whole article :) –

3124:

That has "jste se" in the clitic slot. The "rule" as it's normally explained is just that clitics have to go in the second slot, and a/ale/i go in the "0th slot", so there needs to be something between them and the clitics (compare "přišel jsem domů a vařil jsem si guláš" vs. "přišel jsem domů, pak

2612:

is spoken as a first language predominantly by Polish population there. People who identify themselves as Czechs, or even "Silesians" speak Czech. Many of them understand Cieszyn Silesian dialect but the dialect they speak is already closer to north Moravian dialect. Having said that, I believe the

843:

I've recently started working on this article in hopes of pushing it to GA status and, possibly later, FA. I don't think any articles on individual languages have reached either status within the past few years, so I'm taking a few liberties with the standards to account for escalating demands, but

2799:

The modern standard Czech language originates in standardization efforts of the 18th century. By then the language had developed a literary tradition, and since then it has changed little; journals from that period have no substantial differences from modern standard Czech, and contemporary Czechs

1633:

Since we got no response on here, I asked my girlfriend what she thought and she thinks the explanation is more or less accurate and that I was confused - hledat/vyhledat are not a pair but different verbs and vyhledat has the imperfective form vyhledávat. Adding a prefix to a verb can also change

1139:

It was the second paragraph in the "classification" section which said Czech is different from East and South slavic in that it distinguishes hard and soft consonants. As far as I know, all Slavic languages do this to some extent, South Slavic very minimally, but East Slavic and Polish use it more

1431:

Noticed the GA. I don't feel I have time to do a full review, but I noticed that the phonology section is still based on Czech orthography, not IPA. This really needs to be fixed. Referring to phonemes with normal spelling is not appropriate. It should always be with proper linguistic notation so

1278:

Regarding "most highly inflected": it's your basic native speaker focus on stressing uniqueness. It's probably been a part of virtually every language article by now. Czech grammar seems no more complicated than Russian or Polish, so this is clearly dubious. The statement be removed or toned down

922:

Standard Czech = the written standard language, Common Czech = the normal spoken language in most of Bohemia and some parts of Moravia where local dialects aren't spoken. Some declension and conjugation endings differ between the two, and there are phonological changes as well. Standard Czech can

2834:

I found the source online, and checked this against it, and indeed, it was not discussing the modern standard language but a Havránek study of Baroque-era Czech (before the 18th century). It also doesnt quite say -í and -ejí "merged" (which begs the question "into which form") but that they were

2508:

Well, the issue is a bit more complicated, and I'd really like to write more some time soon, but one minor point now at least: "spisovná" is not the same as "psaná". While the latter is derived from the verb "psát" (to write) and hence means "written" indeed, the former is derived from "spis" (a

1640:

here which describes this using the scale "durative - iterative - frequentative" (using "jít - chodit - chodívat" as an example, all of which are imperfective). I have summed this up briefly using the same example. I removed the "list of suffixes" and replaced it with an example since it's a bit

1023:. Actually this article discusses more registers (artistic, technical/non-technical etc), I'm not sure how many would be useful to cover on this page. As for dialects, most sources divide Czech into four main dialects - Bohemian, Central Moravian, Eastern Moravian, Lach/Silesian (see for example 2903:

Czech's use of future tense differs from English in context-dependent constructions such as conditional clauses - conjunctions like "když", "až" and "jestli" (when~if) require either a future tense verb or a perfective present tense verb (semantically future) following them to refer to a future

2476:

Ah okay so hovorová means "spoken written Czech" (I remember looking for sources on that during the GA push). Thanks. Interdialect is a trendy word in Czech dialectology at the moment and "obecná X" seems to be synonymous with it – the mush Central Moravian is becoming is referred to as "obecná

2185:

Also, notice the behaviour of /v/, which gets devoiced in relevant environments like an ordinary obstruent, but doesn't trigger voicing itself, thus behaving also like another sonorant (i.e. /m/, /l/ etc.); and the behaviour of /r̝/, which gets devoiced just like any other obstruent in relevant

1171:

Czech and Slovak speakerrs understand each other "more so than speakers of most pairs of languages within the West, East, or South Slavic branches." – is this explicitly stated in the source? I find it questionable - with East Slavic, most people in Belarus/Ukraine have the advantage of knowing

2994:

I've only had a quick look at the Grammar section. I think it could do with having less detail about the morphology (e.g. no need to give the declension of the numerals or to list the Czech names of the cases) and more content about the syntax (currently, there's just five short paragraphs and

2275:

goes into more detail on the progressive/regressive voicing and the voicing and devoicing across word boundaries. Since a lot of this stuff varies between dialects I think we should mention it as little as possible here – the count of 10 monophthongs and 3 diphthongs is seldom valid in Moravia

2257:

Having said all that, I realize we need to keep the Phonology section as brief as possible (this kind of information belongs to the standalone Czech Phonology article, I suppose), but, so far, I haven't been able to figure out how to reconcile informativeness, accuracy and shortness. Being a

2281:

Regarding the "at the end of a word" thing, I think the Czech phonology article approaches this more precisely: "Assimilation of voice is an important feature of Czech pronunciation. Voiced obstruents are, in certain circumstances, realized voiceless and vice versa. It is not represented in

1309:

but it says that "he most widely spoken highly-inflected Indo-European languages are members of the Slavic group (Russian, Ukrainian, Polish, Czech, Serbian. etc.)." That's definitely not the same as saying that Czech specifically "one of the most highly inflected languages in the world".

2481:

for example, so there are a few vernaculars called "obecná something" but they don't together form one "main vernacular", they're all rooted in different phonological systems for a start. The Common Czech morphology is clearly linked to the Central Bohemian vowel shifts (ý :

1001:

I agree. Keep in mind that if a source isn't one of those in References (i.e. the actual bibliography), I haven't gone through it yet. I've already noticed, actually, that the 10.0 million figure's citation looks unsatisfactory, but I have not yet sought an alternative.

2750: 2380:" is just as correct. Any ideas as to how to word that? Admittedly, it's not that important, but I have heard a lot of non-native speakers twistinɡ their poor tonɡues while trying to pronounce "přítel" as rather than , achievinɡ somethinɡ like instead, at best. -- 2734:

Can someone substantiate the comment in the Phonology section that in Irish there is the raised alveolar trill? In the section, it notes that this can be found "in front of a slender vowel, as in the word Éire, the Irish name of Ireland", but neither the page for

2002:

is pronounced as . In addition, whether a voiced obstruent devoices at the end of a word depends on whether it is followed by a pause (which is inherently voiceless, of course) or another voiced consonant, Because of that, defining the condition for devoicing as

1701:, I've finally gotten around to looking at that citation issue and I've figured it out: it was an error in the "harv" citation to Hajičová regarding the author fields. I've fixed it now; to be clear, it was correctly referring to her rather than Stankiewicz. 2915:

I think it would be a far better idea to describe Czech tense and aspect in its own terms rather than by way of dodgy comparisons to English. I have made some further clarifications. Hopefully the section on verb conjugation is a bit more accurate now. –

2809:

ej vowel shift happened some time before the 18th century in Bohemian dialects, but the Kralice Bible held out against it, and probably because of this it never made it into the standard language. The way this is written makes it seem as if a) the í :

1735:

I'm also not sure what that's supposed to show. I'm even more unsure about the map below saying that Czech is spoken by a "significant minority" in the whole of Zaolzie... are there any figures on how many Cieszyn Silesian speakers there are left? The

2904:

event, unlike in English where a present tense verb is used. This is a pretty significant difference, IMHO. Another significant difference is the use of specifically perfective verbs in the present tense to talk about actions completing in the future.

3093:

Note that this is not a statement about the first position in a clause in general, but only about the first constituent in a "host-enclitic" construction. Can you have an enclitic following an adjunct prepositional phrase? (Short has a sample clause

2332:

OK, I made a bunch more edits to that section, using the IPA handbook as the source. It's definitely more in-depth than the original source which I don't have access to but seemed to only mention voice consonants devoicing and not vice versa. –

1307: 956:

That seems like a rather unusual way of dividing up a standard language. More details (and references) would be nice. But I'm quite skeptical to the idea that there would be a "spoken written standard". It sounds more like a simple formal

888:? Ref is unclear. Statements like "12,805 Texans can speak the Czech language" should be avoided; opt for "According to Reference XYZ, c. 12,000 residents of Texas reported themselves as speakers of Czech" (assuming it's self-reported). 3010:

Does anyone have access to Short, David (2009). "Czech and Slovak". In Bernard Comrie (ed.). The World's Major Languages (2nd ed.). Routledge. pp. 305–330? I am not sure about this bit in the sentence and clause structure section:

3203: 1806:

could mean she ran, she has run or she had run." It could also mean (and it often means) "she was running". (I hesitate to simply add this meaning because it might require modifying the introductory phrase and/or the reference

1201: 1172:

Russian as well, and it depends on how much we're segmenting South Slavic, whether Bulgarian and Macedonian are really separate, etc. (I think Knowledge (XXG) rightly takes the general stance that BCS is one language) –

3023:

Saying it has to be a "subject or object" is a bit misleading, it can be anything with a noun or (non-clitic) pronoun in it that can be topicalised including e.g. an adjunct prepositional phrase. Take this example from

153: 3193: 2543:

The map is still unsourced though, and I still question whether Czech is really a minority language in Zaolzie today. I couldn't find a map (probably because a map would be fairly unrevealing in this case) but

1081:

Just so you all know, I'm gonna put this up at GAN as soon as everything's cited and looks reasonably nice, which should be either today or tomorrow. Other changes can still be made after the fact, of course.

3178: 2685:

of "Prohibition signs written in Czech, by entry #3 into the building of National Technical Library in Prague." In vain, I am trying to add the note, that the word "střežena" is misspelled on the photo.

3208: 1966:

Nice catch. Actually not sure how that sentence in the lede went unnoticed because it isn't correct. I've reworded it to "10 monophthongs and 3 diphthongs" which I think is enough info for the lede. –

461: 417: 2836:

ej vowel shift can definitely be covered in a more relevant place, preferably from a more in-depth source, I will check Komárek, Lamprecht-Slošar-Bauer and Koupil at home when I get a chance. –

2552:, which has a population of 209,326 (2007). It's not the majority language in the whole district, though there may be individual villages where it is. And the sourced analysis of census data in 3243: 856:. Also, while the Czech ethnic group makes up the largest part of my heritage and I know the language to a moderate degree, my background on Knowledge (XXG) is in video games (particularly 3158: 986:

I'm definitely not an expert on Czech language policies, just observing that it looks odd from what I've seen. Just make sure your sources are actual linguists or authorities like the

3074:

The critical first slot may be occupied by the subject, object, an infinitive or other main form of a verb, an adverb or conjunction (but not the weak coordinating conjunctions

1737: 1462:

By the way, I hope I'm not being annoying with all of this. I just want to be sure I know pretty well how to write language articles, as there are others I'd like to work on.

2007:" simply isn't sufficient. Compare the following consonant realizations, which make it (hopefully) rather clear that pauses behave very much like devoiced consonants indeed: 2282:

orthography, where more etymological principles are applied." I think if we can find a cite to support all this we could just lift this sentence into the main article. –

1477:

Well, I suppose I'm somewhat of a stickler when it comes to phonetics... But I should stress you've done wonders with this article. There's a world of difference between

682: 277: 147: 1765:

I have gone ahead and boldly removed the map, since the data is unsourced and questionable, this is a GA, and there were no comments forthcoming to my query on Commons

1720:

Could a legend be added for the upper map in that box (does those have a particular name?) on the right? It looks as though all of Europe speaks Czech as a majority...

375: 350: 923:

obviously be spoken, it is on TV and radio for example. I guess that is the real standard language. I will try to find some sources when I come back from holiday. –

3233: 672: 2583:

question is rather whether a majority of people in that region actually speak ponaszymu nowadays or whether the north Moravian interdialect is more predominant. –

1927:

a quantitative counterpart to the qualitatively similar, but short, /o/, it only appears in loanwords and onomatopoeia. Also, the difference between the short <

3168: 3025: 804: 776: 3238: 577: 79: 2458:, the codified, recommended and received standard taught at primary and secondary schools and used in public as well as most private media (with many buts). 1222:

Thanks for the ref, I have fixed it to something we can assume from that source, which is that Czech and Slovak are the closest two West Slavic languages. –

3188: 1204:; go to page 58, specifically the part about Polish and Sorbian and the surrounding few sentences. I may have been reading too much into it; can't be sure. 648: 392: 3228: 3218: 567: 961:. Modern standard languages are all influenced by the written standards, but even formal speech is by definition very distinct from written language. 3198: 2420:

Meanwhile OČ enthusiast Milan Hrdlička frames it in the introduction to his book on OČ as simply being the common vernacular of today, as we do. –

85: 3223: 1292:

cited in he body text of the article. The source is academic, too. I'm on my iPod now, but I'll take a look at the other complaints a bit later.

731: 705: 639: 600: 543: 44: 2867:

Although Czech's use of present and future tense is largely similar to that of English, the language uses past tense to represent the English

972:

FWIW, Dialects will be one of the last sections I work on, so you two will have time to decide how segmented we should represent Czech to be.

295: 3173: 2955: 2613:

whole map should be in dark blue, as Czech language is clearly a majority language in Zaolzie (or districts of Karviná and Frýdek-Místek). -

2540:

for the revert, for some reason my browser was still showing the old map with the borderlands coloured in light - clearing cookies fixed it.

1872:

I've noticed some discrepancies between what the intro says about Czech vowels, and the information given in the section on Czech phonology:

2714:

Thanks for the notice, the word "střežena" is really misspelled. I have changed the description at the photo and changed the article image.

2559:

Would anyone object to me colouring the whole of Czechia in dark and leaving the light bits in Vojvodina and Croatia – and maybe adding the

1952:

I'm not sure how to put all this in a simple way, easily comprehensible even to the non-experts. As a phonetician, I'm heavily biased. ;) --

1637:

You can make -ávat verbs from imperfective ones like "kupovávat" and they denote repeated actions. There is a source on the cs.wiki article

884:

is not terribly reliable in my view. Some clarification about the sources used for the Texas Czechs would be nice too. Is it taken from the

30: 3213: 2747:

nor mutations support this (instead, the pronunciation for Éire given in both articles reflects a palatalised alveolar tap). Thanks, --

2699: 2642: 1833: 3163: 1031:

representing the latter three in subsections, so we could probably just cover the differences between Bohemian and Moravian on here. –

3134: 3049: 2981: 2925: 2845: 2821: 2783: 2592: 2572: 2492: 2429: 2342: 2316: 2291: 1975: 1778: 1749: 1679: 1650: 1611:

Hmm, I'm aware of this, but I'd forgotten about it and I don't believe it was mentioned in the source. I wrote it when I kept getting

1595: 1562: 1409: 1262: 1231: 1181: 1149: 1040: 932: 3015:

Enclitics (primarily auxiliary verbs and pronouns) appear in the second syntactic slot of a sentence, after the first stressed unit.

2692:

As a native speaker, I think it is a shame to have an english wikipedia page about czech language with grammar mistakes. Thank You.

534: 495: 283: 99: 2307:

Orrrrr, we can just reword it to "at the end of a word before a pause" which is what the IPA handbook says about final devoicing. –

1853: 3121: 3032:

Koronavirová krize(Top) změnila svět(Foc) a s ním(Top) i způsoby placení(Foc) = "the Coronavirus crisis has changed the world, and

1641:

confusing - all of those were just standard infinitive endings and apart from the -vat ones can denote perfective verbs as well. –

104: 20: 1923:

The latter is definitely more precise, as you cannot reduce the distinction merely to one of vowel length. Although the long /oː/

3183: 3122:"před dvěma dny jste se k otázce, zda budete jmenován premiérem, stavěl dost skepticky kvůli obavám ze stranických sekretariátů." 74: 1999:

oiced consonants with unvoiced counterparts are unvoiced at the end of a word, or when they are followed by unvoiced consonants

987: 470: 3040:

In the second clause "s ním" is in the first slot. That isnt really a subject or object. Curious what Short actually says. –

909:

Harkins (1952) seems like a somewhat dated reference. It would be great if it could be complemented with more recent sources.

168: 65: 2376:" and we do mention it becomes unvoiced in unvoiced environments, we might need to adjust that description a bit, because " 135: 190: 2549: 248: 958: 858: 244: 1111:

Thanks very much for your work on this, I'm back home now and have had time to read through. Just a few questions:

1020:

Well it didn't take me long to find a usable source from the Czech language institute about "spoken written Czech"

185: 1941:

quality: /ɪ/ vs. /iː/. Hence, in reality, Czech has /a/, /aː/, /ɪ/, /iː/, /ɛ/, /eː/, /o/, /o͡u/, /u/, /uː/ as the

1826:

This article doesn't link to articles in other languages about the Czech language. Can somebody please fix this?

109: 199: 129: 3138: 3053: 2985: 2929: 2849: 2825: 2609: 2496: 2433: 2346: 2320: 2295: 1979: 1782: 1753: 1654: 1638: 1599: 1566: 1413: 1266: 1235: 1185: 1153: 1044: 936: 1889:

vowels (each short or long) and twenty-five consonants (divided into "hard", "neutral" and "soft" categories).

476: 2646: 1837: 1114:

Do East Slavic languages not distinguish between hard and soft consonants, moreso even than Czech and Slovak?

2907:

Naughton p140 makes no comparison between Czech and English present and future so this is original research.

2759: 2703: 1683: 335: 2695: 2638: 1991:

Great, thank you! Now, I've also noticed some problems in the Phonology section itself. Please, see below.

1857: 1829: 1675: 736: 710: 125: 3130: 3111: 3045: 2977: 2921: 2841: 2817: 2779: 2588: 2568: 2488: 2425: 2338: 2312: 2287: 1971: 1774: 1745: 1646: 1591: 1558: 1405: 1324: 1258: 1227: 1177: 1145: 1036: 928: 252: 55: 647:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

631: 542:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

385: 265: 615: 594: 70: 877:

A noble endeavor! We definitely need more high-quality language articles. Here are a few suggestions:

175: 2483:

ej, é becoming a peripheral phoneme etc.) I'm going to at least add "in Bohemia" to that sentence. –

1522: 881: 902:

Keep phonology separate from orthography. Spelling and pronunciation are two very different things.

287: 2719: 2666: 366: 161: 2802:

Changes include the morphological shift of í to ej and é to í (although é survives for some uses)

2754: 2618: 1488: 1444: 1435: 1327: 1311: 1280: 993: 964: 914: 204: 1808: 3126: 3107: 3064: 3041: 2996: 2973: 2917: 2837: 2813: 2775: 2658: 2603: 2584: 2564: 2560: 2510: 2484: 2464: 2421: 2381: 2334: 2308: 2283: 2259: 1967: 1953: 1770: 1741: 1642: 1587: 1554: 1401: 1377: 1254: 1223: 1173: 1141: 1064: 1032: 1028: 924: 896: 51: 1725: 1706: 1624: 1537: 1467: 1452: 1385: 1354: 1340: 1297: 1209: 1126: 1101: 1087: 1072: 1007: 977: 867: 845: 227: 201: 141: 218: 2868: 2863:

I just removed this because it is an oversimplified analogy to English and full of holes:

2744: 2272: 1812: 1518: 799: 526: 2972:

I would like to submit this article for FAC soon. Any comments would be appreciated. –

2749: 2715: 2662: 2535: 2478: 853: 644: 403: 24: 2682: 862:

articles), not linguistics, so feel free to correct me if I make any newbie blunders.

3152: 2614: 1335:

Fair enough. I'll remove/reword it in both locations in a few hours, or you can now.

3125:

jsem si vařil guláš"). Think I just need to find a more indepth source for this. –

2897: 2515: 2469: 2386: 2264: 1958: 892: 795: 2545: 2186:

environments, but, unlike any other consonant, also devoices progressively, e.g.:

788: 770: 1740:

can only name three towns and a scattering of villages with 10% Poles in them. –

1021: 1721: 1702: 1698: 1620: 1533: 1463: 1448: 1381: 1350: 1336: 1293: 1205: 1122: 1097: 1083: 1068: 1003: 973: 863: 1634:

the meaning of the verb which is something we should perhaps find a source for.

724: 699: 520: 510: 489: 2872: 2774:

I've just removed it, since it was unsourced as well as being very suspect. –

2608:

Majority of population of Zaolzie nowadays clearly speaks Czech language. The

1581: 621: 516: 1766: 885: 379: 2835:"mixed". I have removed the last sentence of the above segment. The í : --> 243:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 2446:

Well, I'm out of time now, but for the time being my short answer is that

203: 539: 1326:

It is definitely not a work that is focused on comparative linguistics.

3141: 3115: 3056: 2999: 2988: 2932: 2852: 2828: 2787: 2768: 2736: 2723: 2707: 2670: 2650: 2622: 2596: 2576: 2553: 2517: 2503: 2471: 2440: 2388: 2353: 2327: 2302: 2266: 1986: 1960: 1861: 1841: 1816: 1789: 1760: 1729: 1710: 1687: 1661: 1628: 1606: 1573: 1541: 1526: 1491: 1471: 1456: 1438: 1420: 1389: 1358: 1344: 1330: 1314: 1301: 1283: 1273: 1242: 1213: 1192: 1160: 1130: 1105: 1091: 1076: 1051: 1011: 996: 981: 967: 943: 917: 871: 849: 3204:

Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences

895:

actually different from "standard Czech"? Both seem to refer to the

906:

transcription should be added for phonology, not just plain Czech.

409: 2687: 903: 441: 213: 205: 15: 3194:

Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences

3179:

Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are good articles

1323:. It's an English grammar focused on North American English. 1885:

Czech has a moderately-sized phoneme inventory, comprising

1395:

I guess use more specific sources? I found an old copy of

643:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1482: 1478: 328: 3209:

GA-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences

160: 2358:

Great, the passage sounds much better now, thank you!

1279:

until there's a source that can actually confirm it.

3019:, a main form of a verb, an adverb, or a conjunction 2548:

only counts 33,600 L1 indigenous Polish speakers in

1738:

Template:Polish municipalities in the Czech Republic

1497:

Hi, just a quick question on the phonology section:

538:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2407:still a thing or has it been basically replaced by 2371:

One more thing to consider though: since <ř: -->

425:), that does not occur in any other known language? 174: 3159:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use American English 2808:The bit in bold is a little confusing. The í : --> 3244:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors 814:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 2677:Photo of "Prohibition signs written in Czech..." 1140:than Czech (and the ref says so about Polish) – 734:, a project which is currently considered to be 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3017:The first slot must contain a subject or object 2207:f. regressive devoicing across word boundaries: 880:Better figures and sources for total speakers. 2954:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFNaughton2005 ( 293:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 3072: 8: 2800:can understand them with little difficulty. 2794:Confusing sentence in "modern Czech" section 1306:Right you are. It's in Qualls (2012), p. 5, 2693: 2636: 1827: 1673: 1447:, I believed I've fixed it. Is it better? 817:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 765: 746:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Eastern Europe 694: 657:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Czech Republic 589: 484: 307: 260: 231:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 2378:a sound somewhere between Czech's r and š 2374:a sound somewhere between Czech's r and ž 1945:vowels, and /a͡u/, /ɛ͡u/ and /oː/ as the 3120:Thanks a lot! And yes you can, see e.g. 2949: 2804:and the merging of í and the former ejí. 1027:. I've worked a fair bit on the article 3069:Here's the relevant passage on p. 324: 2942: 2556:says Czechs were the majority in 1991. 1997:It says in the Phonology section that " 1499:hard consonants may not be followed by 767: 696: 591: 486: 3234:Top-importance Czech Republic articles 3189:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles 2995:they're all only about word order). – 2242:g. progressive devoicing within words: 2030:→ "to nail/hammer something together" 1288:You know, it's easy to miss, but this 3169:Language and literature good articles 2190:e. regressive devoicing within words: 552:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Languages 278:Language and literature good articles 251:, this should not be changed without 7: 3239:All WikiProject Czech Republic pages 2896:Firstly whether English even has a " 2121:d. devoicing across word boundaries: 1121:I don't know. Why does that matter? 730:This article is within the scope of 637:This article is within the scope of 532:This article is within the scope of 447: 445: 749:Template:WikiProject Eastern Europe 660:Template:WikiProject Czech Republic 475:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3102:with a prepositional phrase, e.g. 2059:c. voicing across word boundaries: 1532:Apparently yes. I hadn't noticed. 1321:The Qualls Concise English Grammar 1063:You know, that article isn't bad, 899:, so how can there be two of them? 14: 286:. If you can improve it further, 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 3229:GA-Class Czech Republic articles 3219:Top-importance language articles 2748: 787: 769: 723: 698: 624: 614: 593: 519: 509: 488: 455: 446: 365: 264: 217: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3199:GA-Class level-4 vital articles 2739:nor wiktionary's page for Éire 988:Institute of the Czech Language 677:This article has been rated as 572:This article has been rated as 3224:WikiProject Languages articles 1711:04:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 1319:And I should add that this is 820:Guild of Copy Editors articles 555:Template:WikiProject Languages 378:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s 274:has been listed as one of the 1: 3164:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 2454:is merely the spoken form of 2153:→ "congress of wine growers" 651:and see a list of open tasks. 546:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3174:Old requests for peer review 3142:14:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC) 3116:14:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC) 3057:13:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC) 3000:12:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC) 2989:12:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC) 2788:13:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 2724:08:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC) 2708:01:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC) 2681:Please, can somebody change 2671:12:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC) 2651:21:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC) 2181:→ "congress of descendants" 1790:08:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 1761:22:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC) 1730:10:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 3096:Včera jste mi ji však nedal 2933:22:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 2769:21:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC) 2518:10:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC) 2504:05:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC) 2472:22:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 2441:21:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 2389:21:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 2354:20:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 2328:19:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 2303:19:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 2267:19:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 2137:→ "congress, meeting etc." 1987:18:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 1961:17:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 1848:Why should it? This is the 1842:12:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC) 399:The text of the entry was: 3260: 3214:GA-Class language articles 2623:11:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC) 2597:10:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC) 2577:10:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC) 2035:b. devoicing within words: 1817:15:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC) 1662:08:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 1397:pravidla českého pravopisu 732:WikiProject Eastern Europe 683:project's importance scale 640:WikiProject Czech Republic 578:project's importance scale 401:Did you know ... that the 2853:08:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 2829:22:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 1898:In the Phonology section: 1629:13:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 1607:09:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 1574:08:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 1542:22:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1527:18:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1517:Should it be otherwise?-- 1492:18:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1472:17:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1457:17:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1439:11:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1421:18:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 1390:16:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 1359:17:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1345:13:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1331:13:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1315:13:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1302:13:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1284:11:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1274:10:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1243:16:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 1214:17:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1193:10:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1161:16:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 1131:17:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1106:21:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 1092:18:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 1077:19:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 1052:05:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1012:20:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 997:20:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 982:19:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 968:18:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 944:16:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 918:11:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 872:03:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 844:overall I'm basing it on 782: 718: 676: 609: 571: 504: 483: 432: 310: 306: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2610:Cieszyn Silesian dialect 2019:→ "to beat somebody up" 2011:a. voicing within words: 1915:found only in loanwords. 1862:21:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 1485:. Keep up the good work! 1432:that it is unambiguous. 3184:GA-Class vital articles 2169:→ "congress of Greeks" 2145:→ "congress of people" 1688:12:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC) 808:, on December 10, 2014. 752:Eastern Europe articles 663:Czech Republic articles 3088: 3038: 3021: 2893: 2806: 2550:Frýdek-Místek District 2418: 2161:→ "congress of women" 1911:basic vowel phonemes, 1822:Language links missing 1802:In Verb conjugation, " 376:fact from this article 75:avoid personal attacks 3036:also payment methods" 3030: 3013: 2865: 2797: 2532:Firstly apologies to 2413: 2237:→ "face of a person" 811:Guild of Copy Editors 805:Guild of Copy Editors 777:Guild of Copy Editors 632:Czech Republic portal 535:WikiProject Languages 469:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 462:level-4 vital article 284:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 2005:at the end of a word 1876:In the introduction: 336:Good article nominee 249:relevant style guide 245:varieties of English 105:No original research 2661:, first paragraph. 1507:, nor weak ones by 247:. According to the 3098:; can you replace 2086:→ "six sentences" 2054:→ "to complicate" 859:Sonic the Hedgehog 802:, a member of the 471:content assessment 407:contains a sound, 329:September 20, 2014 311:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 3026:this news article 2710: 2698:comment added by 2659:Czech orthography 2653: 2641:comment added by 2561:Czechs of Romania 2399:Obecná / Hovorová 2372:is described as " 2202:→ "lamentations" 1852:Knowledge (XXG). 1844: 1832:comment added by 1690: 1678:comment added by 1672:article itself. 1427:Note on GA-status 1202:Here's the source 1029:Moravian dialects 897:standard language 836: 835: 832: 831: 828: 827: 794:This article was 764: 763: 760: 759: 693: 692: 689: 688: 588: 587: 584: 583: 558:language articles 440: 439: 360: 359: 302: 259: 258: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3251: 3068: 2960: 2959: 2947: 2766: 2762: 2757: 2752: 2607: 2539: 2513: 2501: 2467: 2456:spisovná čeština 2438: 2405:hovorová čeština 2384: 2351: 2325: 2300: 2262: 2043:→ "to complain" 1984: 1956: 1787: 1758: 1659: 1604: 1585: 1571: 1418: 1271: 1240: 1190: 1158: 1049: 941: 846:Swedish language 822: 821: 818: 815: 812: 791: 784: 783: 773: 766: 754: 753: 750: 747: 744: 727: 720: 719: 714: 702: 695: 665: 664: 661: 658: 655: 634: 629: 628: 627: 618: 611: 610: 605: 597: 590: 560: 559: 556: 553: 550: 529: 524: 523: 513: 506: 505: 500: 492: 485: 468: 459: 458: 451: 450: 449: 442: 433:Current status: 424: 423: 422: 420: 393:December 2, 2014 369: 346:October 18, 2014 331: 308: 291: 268: 261: 228:American English 224:This article is 221: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3149: 3148: 3062: 3008: 3006:David Short ref 2970: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2953: 2948: 2944: 2869:present perfect 2861: 2796: 2764: 2760: 2755: 2745:Irish phonology 2732: 2679: 2635:Alphabet????? 2633: 2601: 2533: 2530: 2511: 2500: 2497: 2465: 2437: 2434: 2401: 2382: 2350: 2347: 2324: 2321: 2299: 2296: 2273:Czech phonology 2260: 2222: 2136: 2116:→ "six rivers" 2069: 1983: 1980: 1954: 1937:is also one of 1907:Czech contains 1870: 1868:Czech phonology 1824: 1800: 1786: 1783: 1757: 1754: 1718: 1696: 1658: 1655: 1603: 1600: 1579: 1570: 1567: 1550: 1429: 1417: 1414: 1349:Alright, done. 1270: 1267: 1239: 1236: 1189: 1186: 1157: 1154: 1048: 1045: 940: 937: 841: 819: 816: 813: 810: 809: 751: 748: 745: 742: 741: 708: 662: 659: 656: 653: 652: 630: 625: 623: 603: 557: 554: 551: 548: 547: 527:Language portal 525: 518: 498: 466: 456: 428: 427: 418: 416: 415: 414: 397: 327: 253:broad consensus 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3257: 3255: 3247: 3246: 3241: 3236: 3231: 3226: 3221: 3216: 3211: 3206: 3201: 3196: 3191: 3186: 3181: 3176: 3171: 3166: 3161: 3151: 3150: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3104:před dvěma dny 3091: 3090: 3089: 3082:‘and even’ or 3007: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2997:Uanfala (talk) 2969: 2966: 2962: 2961: 2941: 2940: 2936: 2913: 2912: 2908: 2905: 2901: 2860: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2811:ej and é : --> 2795: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2743:the pages for 2731: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2678: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2632: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2529: 2528:Map in infobox 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2498: 2477:hanáčtina" in 2460:Obecná čeština 2435: 2409:obecná čeština 2400: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2348: 2322: 2305: 2297: 2278: 2277: 2255: 2254: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2225: 2224: 2220:<PAUSE: --> 2218: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2203: 2192: 2191: 2183: 2182: 2171: 2170: 2163: 2162: 2155: 2154: 2147: 2146: 2139: 2138: 2134:<PAUSE: --> 2132: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2117: 2103: 2102: 2101:→ "six women" 2088: 2087: 2080: 2079: 2078:→ "six years" 2072: 2071: 2068:<PAUSE: --> 2067: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2045: 2044: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2021: 2020: 2013: 2012: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1981: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1913:and three more 1900: 1899: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1878: 1877: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1823: 1820: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1784: 1755: 1717: 1714: 1695: 1692: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1656: 1635: 1601: 1568: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1495: 1494: 1486: 1460: 1459: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1415: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1317: 1268: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1237: 1217: 1216: 1196: 1195: 1187: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1155: 1134: 1133: 1116: 1115: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1046: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 991: 962: 949: 948: 947: 946: 938: 912: 911: 910: 907: 900: 889: 854:Tamil language 840: 837: 834: 833: 830: 829: 826: 825: 823: 792: 780: 779: 774: 762: 761: 758: 757: 755: 743:Eastern Europe 728: 716: 715: 706:Eastern Europe 703: 691: 690: 687: 686: 679:Top-importance 675: 669: 668: 666: 654:Czech Republic 649:the discussion 645:Czech Republic 636: 635: 619: 607: 606: 604:Top‑importance 601:Czech Republic 598: 586: 585: 582: 581: 574:Top-importance 570: 564: 563: 561: 544:the discussion 531: 530: 514: 502: 501: 499:Top‑importance 493: 481: 480: 474: 452: 438: 437: 430: 429: 419:"řeka" (river) 404:Czech language 398: 373: 372: 370: 362: 361: 358: 357: 354: 347: 343: 342: 339: 332: 324: 323: 320: 317: 313: 312: 304: 303: 272:Czech language 269: 257: 256: 222: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 25:Czech language 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3256: 3245: 3242: 3240: 3237: 3235: 3232: 3230: 3227: 3225: 3222: 3220: 3217: 3215: 3212: 3210: 3207: 3205: 3202: 3200: 3197: 3195: 3192: 3190: 3187: 3185: 3182: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3162: 3160: 3157: 3156: 3154: 3143: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3123: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3037: 3035: 3029: 3027: 3020: 3018: 3012: 3005: 3001: 2998: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2967: 2957: 2951: 2950:Naughton 2005 2946: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2909: 2906: 2902: 2899: 2895: 2894: 2892: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2864: 2858: 2854: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2805: 2803: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2763: 2758: 2751: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2700:89.190.74.149 2697: 2690: 2689: 2684: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2643:78.45.238.165 2640: 2630: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2611: 2605: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2557: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2541: 2537: 2527: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2502: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2480: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2470: 2468: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2451: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2439: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2417: 2416:been removed. 2412: 2410: 2406: 2398: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2379: 2375: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2352: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2326: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2304: 2301: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2280: 2279: 2274: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2265: 2263: 2252: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2227: 2226: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2199: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2180: 2178: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2113: 2110: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2098: 2095: 2090: 2089: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2077: 2074: 2073: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2053: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2006: 2000: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1985: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1959: 1957: 1950: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1926: 1916: 1914: 1910: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1896: 1890: 1888: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1834:77.179.23.154 1831: 1821: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1805: 1797: 1791: 1788: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1715: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1693: 1691: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1663: 1660: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1605: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1583: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1445:Peter Isotalo 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1426: 1422: 1419: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1244: 1241: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1162: 1159: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1053: 1050: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1019: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1000: 999: 998: 995: 992: 989: 985: 984: 983: 979: 975: 971: 970: 969: 966: 963: 960: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 945: 942: 934: 930: 926: 921: 920: 919: 916: 913: 908: 905: 901: 898: 894: 890: 887: 883: 879: 878: 876: 875: 874: 873: 869: 865: 861: 860: 855: 851: 847: 838: 824: 807: 806: 801: 797: 793: 790: 786: 785: 781: 778: 775: 772: 768: 756: 739: 738: 733: 729: 726: 722: 721: 717: 712: 707: 704: 701: 697: 684: 680: 674: 671: 670: 667: 650: 646: 642: 641: 633: 622: 620: 617: 613: 612: 608: 602: 599: 596: 592: 579: 575: 569: 566: 565: 562: 545: 541: 537: 536: 528: 522: 517: 515: 512: 508: 507: 503: 497: 494: 491: 487: 482: 478: 472: 464: 463: 453: 444: 443: 436: 431: 426: 421: 411: 408: 406: 405: 395: 394: 389: 387: 386:Did you know? 381: 377: 371: 368: 364: 363: 355: 353: 352: 348: 345: 344: 340: 338: 337: 333: 330: 326: 325: 321: 318: 315: 314: 309: 305: 300: 298: 297: 289: 285: 281: 280: 279: 273: 270: 267: 263: 262: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 223: 220: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3127:filelakeshoe 3108:Austronesier 3103: 3099: 3095: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3073: 3065:Filelakeshoe 3042:filelakeshoe 3039: 3033: 3031: 3022: 3016: 3014: 3009: 2974:filelakeshoe 2971: 2945: 2937: 2918:filelakeshoe 2914: 2898:future tense 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2873:past perfect 2866: 2862: 2838:filelakeshoe 2814:filelakeshoe 2807: 2801: 2798: 2776:filelakeshoe 2753: 2740: 2733: 2730:Ř in Irish?? 2694:— Preceding 2691: 2680: 2637:— Preceding 2634: 2604:Filelakeshoe 2585:filelakeshoe 2565:filelakeshoe 2558: 2542: 2531: 2485:filelakeshoe 2459: 2455: 2449: 2447: 2422:filelakeshoe 2419: 2414: 2408: 2404: 2402: 2377: 2373: 2335:filelakeshoe 2309:filelakeshoe 2284:filelakeshoe 2256: 2248: 2247: 2234: 2230: 2228: 2219: 2214: 2212: 2197: 2195: 2184: 2176: 2174: 2166: 2158: 2151:sjezd vinařů 2150: 2142: 2133: 2128: 2126: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2083: 2075: 2064: 2049: 2048: 2040: 2025: 2024: 2016: 2004: 1998: 1996: 1968:filelakeshoe 1951: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1922: 1912: 1908: 1906: 1886: 1884: 1871: 1849: 1828:— Preceding 1825: 1803: 1801: 1798:"Ona běžela" 1771:filelakeshoe 1742:filelakeshoe 1719: 1697: 1680:88.101.65.95 1674:— Preceding 1670: 1643:filelakeshoe 1617:imperfective 1616: 1612: 1588:filelakeshoe 1555:filelakeshoe 1551: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1496: 1461: 1434: 1430: 1402:filelakeshoe 1396: 1378:filelakeshoe 1375: 1320: 1289: 1255:filelakeshoe 1224:filelakeshoe 1174:filelakeshoe 1142:filelakeshoe 1095: 1080: 1065:filelakeshoe 1062: 1033:filelakeshoe 925:filelakeshoe 893:Common Czech 857: 842: 803: 735: 678: 638: 573: 533: 477:WikiProjects 460: 435:Good article 434: 412: 402: 400: 391: 383: 349: 334: 294: 292: 288:please do so 276: 275: 271: 240: 236: 232: 225: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2889:she had run 2885:she has run 2879:could mean 2657:Look here: 2563:as well? – 2479:this source 2452:ová čeština 2253:→ "friend" 1854:68.19.5.207 796:copy edited 351:Peer review 226:written in 148:free images 31:not a forum 3153:Categories 2938:References 2877:ona běžela 2546:Ethnologue 2167:sjezd Řeků 2143:sjezd lidí 1947:peripheral 1804:ona běžela 1619:mixed up. 1613:perfective 1519:Ludwigzhou 1096:Oh, snap. 800:Miniapolis 413:(example: 390:column on 282:under the 2859:On tenses 2716:Jirka.h23 2683:the photo 2663:Jirka.h23 2536:Jirka.h23 2223:→ "face" 2159:sjezd žen 886:US Census 549:Languages 540:languages 496:Languages 465:is rated 380:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2952:, p. 140 2696:unsigned 2639:unsigned 2631:Alphabet 2615:Darwinek 2084:šest vět 2076:šest let 2070:→ "six" 2041:stěžovat 1949:vowels. 1939:quantity 1932:and < 1830:unsigned 1716:The maps 1694:Hajičová 1676:unsigned 1376:Thanks, 959:register 737:inactive 711:inactive 467:GA-class 356:Reviewed 296:reassess 241:traveled 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3078:‘and’, 3034:with it 2881:she ran 2737:Ireland 2554:Zaolzie 1850:English 891:How is 850:Nahuatl 839:GA push 681:on the 576:on the 382:in the 319:Process 237:defense 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2688:source 2235:lověka 2179:otomků 2052:ěžovat 1722:Cwbr77 1703:Tezero 1699:Maunus 1621:Tezero 1548:Aspect 1534:Tezero 1464:Tezero 1449:Tezero 1382:Tezero 1351:Tezero 1337:Tezero 1294:Tezero 1206:Tezero 1123:Tezero 1098:Tezero 1084:Tezero 1069:Tezero 1004:Tezero 974:Tezero 864:Tezero 852:, and 473:scale. 341:Listed 322:Result 126:Google 3106:?) – 3100:včera 2756:Necro 1943:basic 1936:: --> 1931:: --> 1809:Svato 1582:EmilJ 1489:Peter 1436:Peter 1328:Peter 1312:Peter 1281:Peter 994:Peter 965:Peter 915:Peter 454:This 233:color 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3112:talk 2968:FAC? 2956:help 2871:and 2761:Shea 2720:talk 2704:talk 2667:talk 2647:talk 2619:talk 2448:hovo 2251:ítel 2177:zd p 2065:šest 2017:zbít 1887:five 1858:talk 1838:talk 1813:talk 1769:. – 1767:here 1726:talk 1707:talk 1684:talk 1625:talk 1615:and 1586:? – 1538:talk 1523:talk 1483:this 1481:and 1479:that 1468:talk 1453:talk 1386:talk 1355:talk 1341:talk 1298:talk 1210:talk 1127:talk 1102:talk 1088:talk 1073:talk 1025:this 1008:talk 978:talk 868:talk 316:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3084:ale 2887:or 2810:--> 2741:nor 2482:--> 2403:Is 2231:ř č 2229:tvá 2213:tvá 2175:sje 2127:sje 1909:ten 1511:or 1503:or 904:IPA 798:by 673:Top 568:Top 176:TWL 3155:: 3139:🐱 3137:) 3133:/ 3114:) 3054:🐱 3052:) 3048:/ 3028:: 2986:🐱 2984:) 2980:/ 2930:🐱 2928:) 2924:/ 2883:, 2875:; 2850:🐱 2848:) 2844:/ 2826:🐱 2824:) 2820:/ 2786:) 2782:/ 2765:mo 2722:) 2706:) 2669:) 2649:) 2621:) 2595:) 2591:/ 2575:) 2571:/ 2495:) 2491:/ 2432:) 2428:/ 2345:) 2341:/ 2319:) 2315:/ 2294:) 2290:/ 2249:př 2198:řk 2196:ná 2129:zd 2114:ek 2109:st 2107:še 2099:en 2094:st 2092:še 2050:zt 2028:ít 2026:sb 1978:) 1974:/ 1925:is 1860:) 1840:) 1815:) 1781:) 1777:/ 1752:) 1748:/ 1728:) 1709:) 1686:) 1653:) 1649:/ 1627:) 1598:) 1594:/ 1565:) 1561:/ 1540:) 1525:) 1470:) 1455:) 1412:) 1408:/ 1388:) 1357:) 1343:) 1300:) 1290:is 1265:) 1261:/ 1234:) 1230:/ 1212:) 1184:) 1180:/ 1152:) 1148:/ 1129:) 1104:) 1090:) 1075:) 1043:) 1039:/ 1010:) 980:) 935:) 931:/ 882:NE 870:) 848:, 374:A 299:it 290:. 239:, 235:, 156:) 54:; 3135:c 3131:t 3129:( 3110:( 3080:i 3076:a 3067:: 3063:@ 3050:c 3046:t 3044:( 2982:c 2978:t 2976:( 2958:) 2926:c 2922:t 2920:( 2891:. 2846:c 2842:t 2840:( 2822:c 2818:t 2816:( 2784:c 2780:t 2778:( 2718:( 2702:( 2665:( 2645:( 2617:( 2606:: 2602:@ 2593:c 2589:t 2587:( 2573:c 2569:t 2567:( 2538:: 2534:@ 2512:P 2499: 2493:c 2489:t 2487:( 2466:P 2450:r 2436: 2430:c 2426:t 2424:( 2383:P 2349: 2343:c 2339:t 2337:( 2323: 2317:c 2313:t 2311:( 2298: 2292:c 2288:t 2286:( 2261:P 2215:ř 2200:y 2112:ř 2097:ž 2003:" 1982: 1976:c 1972:t 1970:( 1955:P 1934:í 1929:i 1917:" 1905:" 1891:" 1883:" 1856:( 1836:( 1811:( 1807:) 1785: 1779:c 1775:t 1773:( 1756: 1750:c 1746:t 1744:( 1724:( 1705:( 1682:( 1657: 1651:c 1647:t 1645:( 1623:( 1602: 1596:c 1592:t 1590:( 1584:: 1580:@ 1569: 1563:c 1559:t 1557:( 1536:( 1521:( 1515:. 1513:í 1509:i 1505:ý 1501:y 1466:( 1451:( 1416: 1410:c 1406:t 1404:( 1384:( 1353:( 1339:( 1296:( 1269: 1263:c 1259:t 1257:( 1238: 1232:c 1228:t 1226:( 1208:( 1188: 1182:c 1178:t 1176:( 1156: 1150:c 1146:t 1144:( 1125:( 1100:( 1086:( 1071:( 1047: 1041:c 1037:t 1035:( 1006:( 990:. 976:( 939: 933:c 929:t 927:( 866:( 740:. 713:) 709:( 685:. 580:. 479:: 410:ř 396:. 388:" 384:" 301:. 255:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index