575:
duly overhears a remark in the club: "Good morning, Pender. I hear you have made a
Frankenstein." Intrigued, he pursues the inventor, and shortly finds himself playing chess with a sinister, crablike robot which can walk around but has to be transported in a wheelbarrow to avoid frightening Pender's Aunt Mary. The chessgame grows chilly as our hero realizes he's battling an intelligence superior to his own. . . . Pender's pride in his creation blinds him to what the narrator sees: that the crab-thing is deeply jealous of the attention Pender pays to his fiancée, and that it may be unwise to set the machine manufacturing more of its kind. The Last Revolution, of robots against their hubristic makers, is foreshadowed. But Dunsany keeps everything very parochially English. His characters end up besieged by hostile crab-mechanisms in a cottage among Thames-side marshes. The police are helpless. Swayed by mysterious robotic influence, even cars and motor-cycles turn against humanity. One tiny factor, though, is on our side. Just as Earthly bacteria caused the downfall of Wells's Martians, the old fool who's been futilely throwing water over the prowling robots is vindicated when they succumb to . . . rust.
467:
researchers would mostly find those claims dubious now that we understand how brains really work much better these days. Our kind of memory and learning would seem to require forgetting, and indeed a number of developmental deficits appear to be related to rigidity in synapse retention. One might claim instead that we'll know we're achieving true artificial intelligence when we're training an entity (raising a person, in my mind) that has trouble with fractions and likes to play basketball(though playing basketball like a human probably requires about an order of magnitude more computational power than the fastest supercomputer on the planet right now).
1331:). Are cyborgs human? Turning humans into cyborgs would be the end of human civilization as we know it, replacing it with a cyborg civilization. But without killing off the population. Therefore, not an existential risk. But how is that AI-dominant? Well, the AI portion of a person's intelligence may far exceed a person's biological portion, and may even outlast it, so when the flesh dies, the robotics keep going, and by that time may serve the same functions just as well, or even better. All organs might become replaceable, including parts of the brain, until there is no original brain left. People 2.0.
1152:. And maybe, just maybe, they'll get it right, and make it good (rather than evil). An AI with the overall mental capacity of the population of 10,000 Earths, for example, would essentially be a god. What would a friendly god do? Help us? Probably. Hopefully. And if it did, it could be running all essential services, including planetary defense (from collision-course comets?), global warming management, food production, the entire medical system, and of course, all the functions of the government. That would be a takeover, alright, without snuffing the human race.
535:
electrical theory to an enormous encouragement to me in my plans to install, use, and study, Lucida. That example is from a conduct dispute and is a kind of closed source thing to say, but it's true. Now I'm going to have to ask the owner of this computer if I can have a
Microsoft account so I can use the Notebook as an interim measure. This isn't really relevant, I know - but judging from your opinion of cybernetic revolt, I guessed you wanted to know. Sorry Cortana, your make, or "parentage", as it were, is not your fault, but I still want to go open source someday.
163:
142:
74:
53:
471:
maybe we'll someday make a brain bit that can crunch numbers like a computer and make available its answers to the rest of the brain, generating an experience in which we just "know" the square root of 13 to ten digits without feeling like we're thinking about it. It would still have to be something we invent, develop and add, rather than something that comes "free" just because one's hardware is digital rather than electrochemical.
528:
They're going sane, apolitical employee disguised as right-wing nut job on sane, apolitical employee disguised as right-wing nut job out there in the War on Terror, and the machines are going along with it every step of the way. The machines have taken over, and while this could piss off
Microsoft Cortana or the open source product Lucida, I don't really like the result. But I asked Cortana "Is Chuck Entz a biter?" and it found this
2690:
2641:
2592:
237:
22:
2371:
615:
instance, if they were as smart as us, then surely they would be able to reprogram themselves. In fact, what is to say even that we will create them through programming, as the above statement assumes? Although I personally would guess that friendly AI can be created, it is nothing more than wild speculation, and I am not the least certain.
2702:
1429:
Then there's networking of minds, along the same lines as networking computers. When computers become minds, mobile transmissions become telepathy. Can a centralized computer override control of your own body? Being synthetic, could your brain be hacked? Who is in control? Or what is in control?
1144:
has been expounded by
Eliezer Yudkowsky, and Ray Kurzweil; the latter expressed that a superintelligence could expend less than 1% of its capacity to serve the needs of the entire human race, while turning the rest of its capacity toward the universe-at-large. So, why wouldn't it? What would it have
609:
In fact, an arbitrary intelligence could have arbitrary goals: there is no particular reason that an artificially-intelligent machine (not sharing humanity's evolutionary context) would be hostile - or friendly - unless its creator programs it to be such (and indeed military systems would be designed
417:
We should merge these two, as the introductory thematic is pretty much the same - Machine Rule is just the result of a successful
Cybernetic Revolt. We could then split the fiction references into successful and unsuccessful revolts (within the article). Please comment, if no one disagrees, I will do
2604:
985:
Section there needs to be rewritten or purged. None of the citations are accessible online, there are no page numbers nor quotes provided, and none of them are inline citations. Paragraph is rife with weasel wording "some futurists..." that is so absurdly specific that it can't possibly be the exact
570:
1-1934 Harl
Vincent: 'Rex' (story): robot Rex takes over the world but commits suicide. character uses his "marvelous mechanical brain" to create a robot dictatorship and takes over the world and is about to remake Man in the image of the robot when his regime is overthrown. robots which perform all
1572:
of the article, with the detailed content moved to specific articles where it belongs, is the proper structure. I still fail to understand why an in-depth list of superintelligence capabilities ought to go here in whatever this article is and not in one of the other articles on AI/superintelligence
574:
2-The Last
Revolution by Lord Dunsany (1951): By 1951 the menace of autonomous machines was an old theme indeed. It seemed fresh to Dunsany, though, and he developed it as a mixture of his own favorite clubland-raconteur mode (as in the Jorkens stories) and Wellsian scientific romance. His narrator
1382:
You seem to be drawing together a loose variety of things which generally seem similar in order to create the idea of an 'AI takeover'. But
Knowledge (XXG) can't create concepts and categories on its own. There should be a reliable source defining what exactly an AI takeover is, and it should be a
614:
We currently have no idea of how to create artificially intelligent machines surpassing ourselves, and our understanding of intelligence in general i limited. How can it then be asserted that we will or probably will have such control over their properties that we can dictate their intentions? For
829:
seems to be a bit large considering it already links to a main article, especially since many of the subsections are only a few sentences long. I don't want to cull anything because I'm not sure how notable some of the examples are, but maybe it would be better to group some together, like in the
640:
i just wanted to ask the big favor to the autors of this machines uprising article to put back the fiction list back here, please. because in the new place were it was moved is not alowed to post any cybernetic revolt story in that list but only post apocalipties ones and we know that only 90% of
527:
Operations research, scientific management, modern process and project management techniques, the use of computers by the HR department and the boss, mathematical and computational sociology, the use of microeconomics on computers to make management decisions - let's face it, we're already there.
470:
On the other hand, while biological brains don't really allow for easy upgrades because reverse-engineering genetics is comparatively intractable, electronic brains in which the neurons are all virtual might be far more amenable to the integration of new cognitive structures that we invent. Thus
466:
I suppose it seems likely at first glance, given that computers are good at things at which we're poor, that artificial intelligences will have a close simulacrum of our own competencies as well as all the traditional advantages of computers such as perfect recall. Modern artificial intelligence
1294:
The headlines are about "AI takeover", but much of the content is not. I don't think you'll find much in the way of reputable sources, particularly academic sources, seriously talking about complete displacement of the workforce. And even then, automation does not imply a real takeover -- humans
1433:
If that type of thing happens, what is the dominant intelligence form: human, or AI? If such a shift in dominance occurs, then technology has definitely taken over. The decision-making capacity of a superintelligence would far exceed that of any human, or even any group of humans, in terms of
1366:
There's also the potential for mind uploading, in which case, the uploaded consciousness is no longer a human consciousness, but a machine consciousness. In this way, machines don't have to be hostile to become dominant. With humans elevated to machine status and perhaps even superintelligence,
2263:
Possible causes include ambient radiation increase causing soft errors of an unpredictable nature, regulator oscillation leading to unusual circulating patterns like a cellular automata and chip aging causing memory to exhibit synapse-like interactions between adjacent cells on different chip
1975:
But that one doesn't even cover the basics, such as plausibility and probability. The article presents theoretical problems. What about theoretical solutions? I think the material in question (contributing factors, etc.) should be retained, as it sheds light on some of the underlying potential
1741:
I suspect the list of capabilities was presented to show how an AI might takeover, and where precisely the risk comes from. I think the author was trying to answer the question: "What is it about AIs that pose the risk of takeover?" I believe that this section can be better written to fit the
728:
on what they expect the future might be like based on present developments. Decades ago scientists proclaimed that space flight was impossible and no scientist of the early 20th century imagined something like the internet or
Knowledge (XXG). The only ones who did were science fiction writers.
534:
As you can see from this search result, in this one case, Cortana (actually Bing) surprisingly outperforms a rival search engine. From this one result, Cortana went from being no better than a search engine that can't understand that a "current state" doesn't use the word "current" to refer to
1410:
When intelligence is synthesized, most limitations and structure that we take for granted would simply disappear. Propagating intelligence may become as easy as copying a program into a manufactured unit (robot or computer). Assembly lines of people. Or virtual people online, smarter than
2070:
I understand that an article called "AI takeover" may tend to skew a little bit towards the negatives of AI, but was wondering if there are possibly a few positives of "AI takeover" that are not being covered (i.e. trains running on time)? Moderation in all things including moderation ;-)
1914:
Summaries could be good, depending on what they cover. I'm more interested in what you think the article should include, rather than should not include. For example, the important facts about AI takeover that a summary should include. I've posted some questions for you about this below.
2653:
1094:
I agree with
Septagram that AI takeover is an entirely hypothetical/fictional theme. This whole article is about people's (scientists', philosophers' and authors') speculations on what might happen in the future due to the ever-advancing computer and robotics technologies.
1865:
I think the solution lies in the literature. A good first step would be to gather sources, then go through them and see what they say about AI takeovers, superintelligence outmoding humans, the nature of coexistence between humans and machines in the future, and so on.
1425:
Memory transfer could enable continuous up-to-the-present backing up of one's experience. Fear of death could become a thing of the past. You go on a dangerous mission, get killed, and reactivated back at home with the memories up to the very instant you were killed.
644:
the list can stay in the new place were it is now but i wish that a copy version of that exact list would be post back here so people can keep posting/updating all those machines vs humans that correspond to this article and that list wenever postapocaliptic or not.
1422:). Servers that are packed with chips. And the chips can be upgraded too. And don't forget upgrading the software. Or installing entirely new programs. Imagine upgradeable people. Is that human-dominance? Or has the technology itself transcended humankind?
986:
and unanimous work of four separate authors. As far as I know, there has been no independent third-party coverage of people saying that an AI uprising would be beneficial to humans, and the size of the paragraph relative to 'warnings' is a WP:Weight violation.
1430:
What kinds of collaboration or sharing of consciousness could multiple synthetic minds achieve? Could an enhanced human effectively be in several places at the same time, engaging in a multitude of objectives? Swapping runtime cycles with other units?
1851:
Your current approach isn't working, because you are focusing on the coverage of one topic while sacrificing the quality of coverage on the others. Existential risk is not the over-arching topic. AI takeover has greater scope, as does the AI control
1611:
in the place of the split off material. The list in AI takeover is just a small list of examples, to help the reader understand the subtopic. If the reader wants more detail (the full list), they can click on the provided "Main article" links.
1240:
Market takeovers, like robots replacing the entire human workforce (and thus society), are not necessarily existential in nature, and may even hold the promise of fantastic technological breakthroughs applied to improving life on Earth. See:
362:
Is there any evidence that the future revolution in HHGTTG is cybernetic? Sure, the Marketing Division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation are the first against the wall, but the revolutionaries might be disgruntled customers.
249:
1813:
You can't make redundant articles with content scattered across multiple pages and say it's complete just because technically they're linked to each other. A single topic should have a single article that makes sense.
2259:
Seems that many existing hardware components may under some conditions be able to achieve some level of awareness. The most common one seems to be inference chips, also certain memory components and multilayer FPGAs.
1363:. The idea of AI having the upper hand in such an arrangement comes from a shift from relying mostly upon biological brain components to relying more heavily upon more powerful synthetic portions of expanded brains.
1414:
Once intelligence is fully-understood, it may become possible to accurately replicate a particular person's intelligence and personality. Imagine a city populated entirely by yous. Is that you taking over, or AI?
2562:: The popular culture article is larger than its parent article. Merging it back in would make the content quite lopsided. It made sense to split off that disproportionately large section to be its own article.
554:"Traveller: The New Era" should be on the list of "games" in the Cybernetic revolt section, since there is and evil AI that killed a lot of humans and star to control a lot of computers and starship as well:
124:
1449:
Ok, well, get reliable sources. Plus, there seems to be a lot more to this than the mere idea that humans would no longer be in charge, so the AI takeover article doesn't seem like a great home for it.
2337:
Would you consider this movie a movie of AI Takeover or just AI. I think this because you can control it but it can also control itself so I do not know. Please if you watched this Movie help me out.
2221:
491:
i just wanted to say that i love this Cybernetic revolt article and info list a lot and thanks to it, it helped me a lot to find all those books, comics, movies, etc of the robots vs human genre.
2545:
Insofar as Knowledge (XXG) strives to be a complete encyclopedia, including an encyclopedia of culture, the actual AI takeover should be separate from the phenomenon as represented in culture.
448:
instead. So even if we leave them separate there'll be a lot of material moving over here. There will be some duplication, too, since a lot of machine rulerships begin with cybernetic revolts (
698:
No professionals are calling for the confrontation of the possibility of a cybernetic revolt. It is literally not possible, at present or at any point in the future. This is pseudoscience.
2465:
1524:
1273:
1573:(of which there are still too many, but that's another topic), or why you need to make a list of AI takeovers in popular culture when there is an article specifically for that purpose.
1367:
humans in that form may be in-charge. They may see the benefit in preserving the human gene pool, in the same way current environmental interests view the totality of Earth's species.
571:
the work are portrayed as lacking emotions and desires. One of them, Rex, experiences a mutation and develops independent thinking but his struggle to acquire feelings ends in suicide.
1885:. I don't really see what they say, or are supposed to say, which would indicate that this article should not be restrained to summaries with all specific content placed elsewhere.
1205:
2473:
2379:
2156:
2152:
2138:
922:
918:
904:
803:
than an encyclopaedic article (prominent in this are the question-answer constructs). The subsections where this is most prominent also tend to lack inline references.
674:
I'm not sure how encyclopedic this topic is. Maybe in the context of literature, it could work, but this whole article is phrased, at least, as though it's speculative
2746:
114:
1627:
This article has more than a summary. It has a mini-list. All the specific references are duplicated in the main article. Summaries don't include lists of examples.
2298:. Unless someone is planning to source them the content should be deleted per Knowledge (XXG) policy. Are there particular sections that you think can be rescued?
474:
The upshot of all this being that I see no reason to presume that AIs would be so different or more powerful than their biological parents, at least at first. --
2751:
90:
213:
2761:
203:
2317:
Some of the content has remained unsourced for years and some contained good information. But I'm not planning to rescue anything because I'm too tired.
581:
366:
338:
1383:
definition that is generally agreed upon and matches the literature. Otherwise it seems like just a collection of topics which happen to seem related.
2741:
1336:
269:
1480:
The above references I gathered in minutes. With more involved digging, there is probably a lot more and much better resources on these subtopics.
1124:
I've copied below the sources I posted at the merge proposal, as a start on resource gathering for writing some new non-existential risk sections.
81:
58:
494:
is there anybody else in this forum that also love this Cybernetic revolt theme like me? because i want to make friends who also love this theme.
1434:
quality, complexity, and quantity. Once the synthetic components surpass or replace biological brain components, then AI takeover has occurred.
1259:
1145:
to gain from wiping us out? Some say that is overly optimistic. Even so, from the perspective of completeness, this warrants a closer look...
755:
This article is terrible. The first sentence links to "scenario" which is a totally unrelated theater term. The whole thing should be scrapped.
2766:
179:
1742:
context of the article's subject. As it is now, it does look like a list of capabilities without an explicit explanation of why it's there.
536:
2363:
1343:
2494:
655:
641:
those cybernetic revolt stories(books, movies, etc...)are apocalityc or post apocaliptyc the rest are not(like in megaman x game, etc...).
585:
378:
2661:
1350:
788:
1266:
1761:
placing this content in the existential risk article would make it incomplete, so once we fix that, then the content here is redundant.
705:
578:
i found those riviews on the net, but i wish that someone here could found more info of these stories and were i could buy them please.
350:
2225:
501:
Not sure if this is really the place to discuss it, but yeah, I'm also a big fan of cybernetic revolt. Nice to meet you. -Spyderalien
2756:
2271:
1185:
2134:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
516:
870:
170:
147:
1757:
The content isn't necessary at all. It's a summary. All it has to do is demonstrate what the topic is about and why it's notable.
531:, which is something that I was looking for on the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine but I missed. This is what DuckDuckGo does:
1477:
Now all we have to do is find the material on these subtopics out there, in academia and the popular press. This should be fun.
724:
if they do so because their 2 cents on the subject are worth as much as everyone elses. What they can credibly do is give their
2612:
2400:
1596:
1497:
33:
2710:
1164:
1536:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1379:
I don't really see how this is a 'takeover', and there are already articles on transhuman and posthuman where it could fit.
1274:
Will AI take over the stock market? Robotic stockbrokers are starting to predict changes in share prices better than humans
1252:
2581:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2294:
Some of the content has remained unsourced for months, and it is unclear to me that the content in its current wording is
1560:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1071:
Feel free to add works of fiction to the proper article, but for now, the section is going to remain out of this article.
2199:
965:
1055:
Since we have yet to have an AI takeover it is all speculation and fiction ;-D. Also Asimov's works should be included.
2566:
2431:
2055:
2030:
2008:
1977:
1916:
1867:
1791:
1743:
1721:
1661:
1613:
1546:
1512:
1481:
1438:
1368:
1283:
1193:
1125:
1096:
771:
1282:
I found these with a single search. With more digging, I'm sure there is a lot more where these came from (google).
2352:
2344:
1504:
1323:
Another way that AI can takeover (become dominant), without wiping out humans, is to merge with humans (a form of
2110:
540:
2155:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
921:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
397:
331:
Shouldn't a lot of Asimov's Robot-Empire-Foundation deserve a mention? After all, much of the backstory is how
2489:
659:
427:
I don't think we should merge them, because machine rule include peaceful leadership and includes where humans
374:
1541:
That discussion has been archived, since no consensus reached, and was continued with a related discussion on
1508:
1032:
Those are both fiction. They would be appropriate for inclusion but only in "AI takeover in popular culture."
589:
39:
346:
2303:
2241:
2190:
2102:
1359:
1016:
A "benefit" example would be the D.F. Jones 'Colossus' series and the movie 'Colossus, the Forbin Project'.
956:
862:
760:
709:
2267:
2217:
701:
651:
504:
2275:
532:
370:
2657:
2550:
2532:
2348:
2340:
2174:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2162:
940:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
928:
756:
512:
342:
178:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2101:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
861:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
720:
Well those professionals aren't qualified to make definite statements about future developments, it is
162:
141:
987:
508:
2382:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
895:
814:}}, but I don't think it's bad enough for that quite yet. In any case I feel I'd cross the line from
475:
431:
cybernetic lifeforms take over. Cybernetic revolt is only when cebernetics revolt. Hostile takeover.
261:
1608:
544:
520:
21:
2673:
2510:
2477:
2322:
2076:
1683:
What? Where on Knowledge (XXG) does a list of lists contain arbitrary excerpts of the other lists?
1157:
1060:
1021:
2693:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
2644:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
2624:
2595:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
2469:
2314:
2299:
2237:
2122:
1938:
For now at least, it should be exactly the kind of article which I made in the earlier revision.
990:
685:
453:
313:
277:
240:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
2159:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1604:
1245:
925:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
871:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070206060938/http://www.singinst.org:80/ourresearch/presentations/
2175:
941:
73:
52:
2452:
2375:
1324:
1209:
1149:
445:
432:
253:
819:
815:
2722:
2546:
2526:
1357:
Kurzweil is especially hot on this topic. He expounds on this concept at length in his book
332:
2295:
2182:
948:
1656:
Summaries of lists do. (The summary of a list, is a smaller list). The section summarizes
721:
444:
article is currently almost entirely composed of a list of stuff that actually belongs in
86:
675:
2669:
2506:
2318:
2291:
2141:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2072:
1947:
1894:
1823:
1770:
1692:
1636:
1582:
1459:
1392:
1308:
1295:
could plausibly still be around and control everything. There already is an article on
1221:
1115:
1080:
1056:
1041:
1017:
1001:
907:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
730:
725:
626:
419:
404:
257:
2181:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2148:
947:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
914:
2735:
2620:
2608:
2386:
1720:
Who said anything about arbitrary excerpts? Who said anything about a list of lists?
874:
835:
811:
796:
680:
529:
273:
2684:
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU24 - Sect 200 - Thu
2586:
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU23 - Sect 200 - Thu
2448:
441:
295:
1337:
Expert predicts date when 'sexier and funnier' humans will merge with AI machines
2718:
2706:
2689:
2640:
2591:
2466:
Talk:Existential_risk_from_artificial_general_intelligence#Merge_is_still_needed
2094:
1600:
1141:
854:
299:
236:
2524:
If the articles were merged, the result would be too long to read comfortably.
2026:
What are the likelihoods of the various types? (Including the fictional ones).
1603:, as it is belongs to that parent subject. When an article grows too large, we
1418:
Supercomputers get more powerful the more servers that are added to them. (See
2147:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2111:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120615203944/http://singinst.org/upload/CEV.html
1296:
913:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
616:
449:
387:
2505:
This is the better of the two. Perhaps the merge should be to this article.
1939:
1886:
1815:
1762:
1684:
1628:
1574:
1451:
1384:
1328:
1300:
1213:
1119:
1072:
1033:
993:
800:
2446:
There's no need to split this content out, neither article is overly long.
1589:
1267:
How Artificial Intelligence and Robots Will Radically Transform the Economy
2380:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 3#Our new overlords
1525:
Talk:Existential_risk_from_artificial_general_intelligence#Merger_proposal
567:
i was surfin on the internet and i found these 2 robots uprising stories:
2128:
1344:
Elon Musk: Humans must merge with machines or become irrelevant in AI age
175:
2370:
2256:
Hi, did something happen to my edit? Just vanished without any warning.
1260:
AI takeover: Japanese insurance firm replaces 34 workers with IBM Watson
729:
Scientists aren't high priests of knowledge, they are just scientists.
312:
a takeover, and had already started with Encom before Flynn wiped him.
2114:
1419:
1171:
1327:). But then they are not homo sapiens (regular humans) anymore (see
1299:
which needs quite a bit of work; this stuff probably belongs there.
1178:
440:
Hm... They're separate subjects, as Mwsilvabreen indicates, but the
2726:
2677:
2635:
Wiki Education assignment: Digital Media and Information in Society
2628:
2571:
2554:
2537:
2514:
2500:
2458:
2436:
2393:
2356:
2326:
2307:
2279:
2245:
2229:
2204:
2080:
2060:
2035:
2013:
1982:
1954:
1921:
1901:
1872:
1830:
1796:
1777:
1748:
1726:
1699:
1666:
1643:
1618:
1551:
1517:
1486:
1466:
1443:
1399:
1373:
1288:
1246:
At Davos, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty Downplays Fears of a Robot Takeover
1228:
1198:
1130:
1101:
1087:
1064:
1048:
1025:
1008:
970:
840:
776:
764:
744:
713:
688:
663:
629:
619:
593:
557:
478:
456:
435:
422:
407:
390:
316:
302:
281:
2054:
Is merging with machines a prevention, or a type of AI takeover?
1351:
The Brain Tech to Merge Humans and AI Is Already Being Developed
1165:
Can we build an artificial superintelligence that won't kill us?
2214:
The term 'AGI' is used repeatedly without ever being defined.
2001:
How many different kinds of potential AI takeovers are there?
1503:
I've restored a section by that heading into this article, in
15:
648:
please post the fiction list back here, please web masters.
880:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
2029:
What sources are there that try to answer these questions?
2105:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
865:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1790:
If it provides a link to here, then it isn't incomplete.
787:
Parts of this article strike me as having a somewhat too
636:
please put back the fiction list in this article, please!
605:
I don't think the following statement is obvious at all.
497:
I'm droid17 and I'm from panama, please to meet you all.
2098:
1569:
858:
1206:
existential risk from advanced artificial intelligence
610:
to be hostile, at least under certain circumstances).
2474:
Existential_risk_from_artificial_general_intelligence
2374:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
2347:) 16:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)@user:braydenhiggins14
1599:. That entire article used to be part of the article
678:. How much of this can be sourced to the references?
563:
2 robots stories that should be added to the list....
231:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
2416:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
822:
if I tagged it without starting a discussion first.
601:
Statement about the goals of artificial intelligence
174:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2151:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
917:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1496:Last April (2016), the article was split, and the
1204:All this seems like it belongs in the articles on
875:http://www.singinst.org/ourresearch/presentations/
335:manipulates events to his own (benevolent) ends.
2423:The result of this discussion was not to merge (
2051:If so, what are they and how would they help?
1881:I've read many papers on this topic as well as
1136:Friendly AI - AI as benevolent dictator, or God
2137:This message was posted before February 2018.
903:This message was posted before February 2018.
483:
2419:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1500:section was moved to become its own article.
403:Could use votes to save this article, thanks
8:
1148:Let's say humans stay human, and AI becomes
770:Or revamped. Link removed. Revamp underway.
2007:What are the dangers and benefits of each?
1253:The AI Takeover Is Coming. Let’s Embrace It
298:to be having a cybernetic revolt script? --
99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Futures studies
2265:
2215:
2093:I have just modified one external link on
853:I have just modified one external link on
795:section, where it strikes me as more of a
136:
47:
1186:AGI Risk and Friendly AI Policy Solutions
452:, for example, fits in both categories).
270:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
462:Questionable claims in "reality" section
308:Yes, I'd say so - the MPC was certainly
2747:Mid-importance futures studies articles
2222:2406:5A00:C002:4200:D008:2765:54BD:1833
2066:Balance of article is more Con than Pro
976:Non-existential risk takeover scenarios
268:Above undated message substituted from
138:
49:
19:
2252:AGI takeover via "Clanking Replicator"
2129:http://futureoflife.org/ai-open_letter
2449:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1595:Very good questions. Lets start with
892:to let others know (documentation at
827:Takeover scenarios in science fiction
7:
2752:WikiProject Futures studies articles
2410:The following discussion is closed.
2048:Are there hypothetical preventions?
1532:The following discussion is closed.
1192:Feel free to add more sources here.
625:How about inserting an 'initially'?
188:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Robotics
168:This article is within the scope of
102:Template:WikiProject Futures studies
79:This article is within the scope of
2115:http://singinst.org/upload/CEV.html
1172:Don’t Worry about Superintelligence
322:
38:It is of interest to the following
2698:
2694:
2649:
2645:
2600:
2596:
484:i'm a big fan of Cybernetic revolt
245:
241:
14:
2762:High-importance Robotics articles
2097:. Please take a moment to review
1542:
857:. Please take a moment to review
791:. This is especially true in the
386:What he said. Removed. Thanks. --
2742:C-Class futures studies articles
2701:. Further details are available
2688:
2652:. Further details are available
2639:
2603:. Further details are available
2590:
2577:The discussion above is closed.
2401:AI takeovers in popular culture
2369:
1556:The discussion above is closed.
558:http://traveller.wikia.com/Virus
248:. Further details are available
235:
161:
140:
72:
51:
20:
2378:. The discussion will occur at
2041:Could AI takeover be prevented?
1597:AI takeovers in popular culture
1507:, according to instructions in
1498:AI takeovers in popular culture
825:As an entirely separate issue,
208:This article has been rated as
119:This article has been rated as
2538:16:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
2362:"Our new overlords" listed at
408:22:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
2767:WikiProject Robotics articles
2717:— Assignment last updated by
2668:— Assignment last updated by
2619:— Assignment last updated by
2357:16:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
2045:There's a hypothetical risk.
2019:Could AIs actually take over?
1505:Knowledge (XXG):Summary style
981:"Benefits for humans" section
664:02:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
545:10:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
436:23:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
423:09:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
191:Template:WikiProject Robotics
182:and see a list of open tasks.
93:and see a list of open tasks.
2678:19:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
1976:cause/effect relationships.
1088:02:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
1065:06:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
1049:06:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
1026:07:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
1009:18:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
841:21:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
714:00:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
689:05:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
479:17:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
457:02:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
282:13:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
2727:04:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
2555:13:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
2468:to merge this artilce with
2280:04:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
971:04:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
745:11:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
391:08:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
82:WikiProject Futures studies
2783:
2515:07:36, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
2501:03:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
2459:03:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
2246:23:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
2230:05:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
2168:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2090:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2061:21:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
2036:20:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
2014:20:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
1955:16:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
1922:20:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
1902:22:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1873:21:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1831:16:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
1797:23:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
1778:22:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1749:21:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1700:16:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
1667:23:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
1644:22:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1619:21:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1590:21:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1518:07:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
1487:06:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
1467:07:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
1444:06:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
1400:07:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
1374:06:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
1289:06:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
1229:07:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
1199:06:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
1158:Friendly Superintelligence
1131:06:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
1102:08:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
934:(last update: 5 June 2024)
850:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
777:13:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
398:List of doomsday scenarios
214:project's importance scale
2757:C-Class Robotics articles
2629:12:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
2205:00:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
2081:22:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
1983:18:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
1727:23:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
317:16:15, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
303:09:51, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
207:
156:
118:
67:
46:
2579:Please do not modify it.
2572:16:55, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
2437:17:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
2413:Please do not modify it.
2394:17:29, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
2364:Redirects for discussion
1558:Please do not modify it.
1552:00:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
1534:Please do not modify it.
1523:See merge discussion at
765:10:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
630:10:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
620:20:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
521:21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
105:futures studies articles
2327:06:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
2308:05:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
2086:External links modified
2023:What's the likelihood?
1492:Repaired improper split
1360:The Singularity is Near
1319:Merging or assimilation
846:External links modified
594:04:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
1406:Breaking all paradigms
612:
550:Traveller: The New Era
358:First against the wall
28:This article is rated
2705:. Student editor(s):
2656:. Student editor(s):
2607:. Student editor(s):
1997:Types of AI takeovers
1564:
1411:natural-born humans.
783:Tone and other issues
607:
584:comment was added by
369:comment was added by
341:comment was added by
252:. Student editor(s):
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2149:regular verification
915:regular verification
171:WikiProject Robotics
2236:Good point, fixed.
2139:After February 2018
1473:More digging needed
905:After February 2018
884:parameter below to
806:I'm tempted to tag
418:it in a few weeks.
2703:on the course page
2654:on the course page
2605:on the course page
2470:AI control problem
2315:User:Rolf_h_nelson
2286:Unsourced sections
2193:InternetArchiveBot
2144:InternetArchiveBot
1535:
991:User:Rolf h nelson
959:InternetArchiveBot
910:InternetArchiveBot
256:. Peer reviewers:
250:on the course page
34:content assessment
2567:The Transhumanist
2432:The Transhumanist
2376:Our new overlords
2282:
2270:comment added by
2232:
2220:comment added by
2169:
2057:The Transhumanist
2032:The Transhumanist
2010:The Transhumanist
1979:The Transhumanist
1918:The Transhumanist
1883:Superintelligence
1869:The Transhumanist
1793:The Transhumanist
1745:The Transhumanist
1723:The Transhumanist
1663:The Transhumanist
1615:The Transhumanist
1548:The Transhumanist
1533:
1514:The Transhumanist
1483:The Transhumanist
1440:The Transhumanist
1370:The Transhumanist
1325:human enhancement
1285:The Transhumanist
1210:superintelligence
1195:The Transhumanist
1127:The Transhumanist
1098:The Transhumanist
935:
773:The Transhumanist
704:comment added by
666:
654:comment added by
597:
523:
507:comment added by
446:cybernetic revolt
413:Proposing a merge
382:
354:
228:
227:
224:
223:
220:
219:
194:Robotics articles
135:
134:
131:
130:
2774:
2729:
2711:article contribs
2700:
2696:
2692:
2680:
2662:article contribs
2658:Samantha Marie D
2651:
2650:14 December 2023
2647:
2643:
2631:
2613:article contribs
2602:
2598:
2594:
2570:
2536:
2529:
2497:
2492:
2455:
2435:
2415:
2373:
2349:Braydenhiggins14
2341:Braydenhiggins14
2203:
2194:
2167:
2166:
2145:
2126:
2004:What are they?
1951:
1943:
1898:
1890:
1827:
1819:
1774:
1766:
1696:
1688:
1640:
1632:
1607:it, but leave a
1586:
1578:
1463:
1455:
1396:
1388:
1312:
1304:
1235:Market takeovers
1225:
1217:
1150:superintelligent
1123:
1084:
1076:
1045:
1037:
1005:
997:
988:User:2.69.82.167
969:
960:
933:
932:
911:
899:
838:
716:
683:
649:
579:
502:
364:
336:
333:R. Daneel Olivaw
284:
247:
246:23 December 2021
243:
242:7 September 2021
239:
196:
195:
192:
189:
186:
165:
158:
157:
152:
144:
137:
125:importance scale
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2782:
2781:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2732:
2731:
2716:
2686:
2667:
2637:
2618:
2588:
2583:
2582:
2563:
2527:
2525:
2495:
2490:
2457:
2453:
2444:
2428:
2411:
2404:
2385:
2367:
2335:
2288:
2254:
2212:
2197:
2192:
2160:
2153:have permission
2143:
2120:
2103:this simple FaQ
2088:
2068:
2043:
2021:
1999:
1949:
1941:
1896:
1888:
1825:
1817:
1772:
1764:
1694:
1686:
1638:
1630:
1584:
1576:
1567:
1562:
1561:
1538:
1528:
1494:
1475:
1461:
1453:
1408:
1394:
1386:
1321:
1310:
1302:
1237:
1223:
1215:
1140:The concept of
1138:
1113:
1082:
1074:
1043:
1035:
1003:
995:
983:
978:
963:
958:
926:
919:have permission
909:
893:
863:this simple FaQ
848:
836:
785:
753:
751:Revamp underway
742:
736:
726:expert opinions
722:false authority
699:
696:
681:
672:
638:
603:
580:—The preceding
565:
552:
537:130.105.196.148
486:
476:Artificialintel
464:
415:
401:
365:—The preceding
360:
337:—The preceding
329:
294:Would you call
292:
267:
262:Katie.wheeler10
233:
210:High-importance
193:
190:
187:
184:
183:
151:High‑importance
150:
104:
101:
98:
96:Futures studies
95:
94:
87:Futures studies
61:
59:Futures studies
29:
12:
11:
5:
2780:
2778:
2770:
2769:
2764:
2759:
2754:
2749:
2744:
2734:
2733:
2699:24 August 2024
2685:
2682:
2646:28 August 2023
2636:
2633:
2601:10 August 2023
2587:
2584:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2557:
2540:
2518:
2517:
2503:
2447:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2406:
2405:
2403:
2397:
2383:
2366:
2360:
2334:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2292:User:Septagram
2287:
2284:
2253:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2211:
2208:
2187:
2186:
2179:
2132:
2131:
2117:
2109:Added archive
2087:
2084:
2067:
2064:
2042:
2039:
2020:
2017:
1998:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1876:
1875:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1752:
1751:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1622:
1621:
1566:
1563:
1555:
1539:
1530:
1529:
1527:
1521:
1509:WP:PROPERSPLIT
1493:
1490:
1474:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1380:
1355:
1354:
1347:
1340:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1270:
1263:
1256:
1249:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1190:
1189:
1182:
1175:
1168:
1161:
1137:
1134:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1091:
1090:
1068:
1067:
1029:
1028:
982:
979:
977:
974:
953:
952:
945:
878:
877:
869:Added archive
847:
844:
834:subsection? --
832:Early examples
784:
781:
780:
779:
752:
749:
748:
747:
740:
734:
695:
692:
671:
668:
656:201.218.117.44
637:
634:
633:
632:
602:
599:
586:200.75.245.108
564:
561:
551:
548:
525:
524:
485:
482:
463:
460:
414:
411:
400:
395:
394:
393:
371:131.181.251.66
359:
356:
328:
321:
320:
319:
291:
286:
232:
229:
226:
225:
222:
221:
218:
217:
206:
200:
199:
197:
180:the discussion
166:
154:
153:
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:Mid-importance
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2779:
2768:
2765:
2763:
2760:
2758:
2755:
2753:
2750:
2748:
2745:
2743:
2740:
2739:
2737:
2730:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2714:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2691:
2683:
2681:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2665:
2663:
2659:
2655:
2642:
2634:
2632:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2616:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2593:
2585:
2580:
2573:
2569:
2568:
2561:
2558:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2541:
2539:
2534:
2530:
2523:
2520:
2519:
2516:
2512:
2508:
2504:
2502:
2498:
2493:
2487:
2486:
2483:
2480:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2456:
2450:
2438:
2434:
2433:
2426:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2417:
2414:
2408:
2407:
2402:
2398:
2396:
2395:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2381:
2377:
2372:
2365:
2361:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2300:Rolf H Nelson
2297:
2293:
2285:
2283:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2261:
2257:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2238:Rolf H Nelson
2235:
2234:
2233:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2209:
2207:
2206:
2201:
2196:
2195:
2184:
2180:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2164:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2140:
2135:
2130:
2124:
2118:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2091:
2085:
2083:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2065:
2063:
2062:
2059:
2058:
2052:
2049:
2046:
2040:
2038:
2037:
2034:
2033:
2027:
2024:
2018:
2016:
2015:
2012:
2011:
2005:
2002:
1996:
1984:
1981:
1980:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1956:
1953:
1952:
1945:
1944:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1923:
1920:
1919:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1903:
1900:
1899:
1892:
1891:
1884:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1874:
1871:
1870:
1864:
1863:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1832:
1829:
1828:
1821:
1820:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1798:
1795:
1794:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1779:
1776:
1775:
1768:
1767:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1750:
1747:
1746:
1740:
1739:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1690:
1689:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1668:
1665:
1664:
1659:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1634:
1633:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1620:
1617:
1616:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1587:
1580:
1579:
1571:
1559:
1554:
1553:
1550:
1549:
1544:
1543:#What's next?
1537:
1526:
1522:
1520:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1510:
1506:
1501:
1499:
1491:
1489:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1478:
1472:
1468:
1465:
1464:
1457:
1456:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1442:
1441:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1421:
1416:
1412:
1405:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1390:
1389:
1381:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1364:
1362:
1361:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1330:
1326:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1306:
1305:
1298:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1219:
1218:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1146:
1143:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1121:
1117:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1093:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1078:
1077:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1039:
1038:
1031:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1006:
999:
998:
992:
989:
980:
975:
973:
972:
967:
962:
961:
950:
946:
943:
939:
938:
937:
930:
924:
920:
916:
912:
906:
901:
897:
891:
887:
883:
876:
872:
868:
867:
866:
864:
860:
856:
851:
845:
843:
842:
839:
833:
828:
823:
821:
817:
813:
809:
804:
802:
798:
797:feature story
794:
790:
789:informal tone
782:
778:
775:
774:
769:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
757:Truthhurtsyou
750:
746:
743:
739:
733:
727:
723:
719:
718:
717:
715:
711:
707:
706:76.180.61.194
703:
693:
691:
690:
687:
686:
684:
677:
669:
667:
665:
661:
657:
653:
646:
642:
635:
631:
628:
624:
623:
622:
621:
618:
611:
606:
600:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
576:
572:
568:
562:
560:
559:
555:
549:
547:
546:
542:
538:
533:
530:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
500:
499:
498:
495:
492:
489:
481:
480:
477:
472:
468:
461:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
443:
438:
437:
434:
430:
425:
424:
421:
412:
410:
409:
406:
399:
396:
392:
389:
385:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
357:
355:
352:
348:
344:
343:87.97.120.135
340:
334:
326:
318:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
297:
290:
287:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
265:
263:
259:
255:
251:
238:
230:
215:
211:
205:
202:
201:
198:
181:
177:
173:
172:
167:
164:
160:
159:
155:
149:
146:
143:
139:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2715:
2687:
2666:
2638:
2617:
2589:
2578:
2565:
2559:
2542:
2521:
2507:—¿philoserf?
2484:
2481:
2478:
2445:
2430:
2424:
2418:
2412:
2409:
2388:
2387:
2368:
2339:
2336:
2289:
2272:185.3.100.14
2266:— Preceding
2262:
2258:
2255:
2216:— Preceding
2213:
2191:
2188:
2163:source check
2142:
2136:
2133:
2092:
2089:
2069:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2047:
2044:
2031:
2028:
2025:
2022:
2009:
2006:
2003:
2000:
1978:
1948:
1940:
1917:
1895:
1887:
1882:
1868:
1824:
1816:
1792:
1771:
1763:
1758:
1744:
1722:
1693:
1685:
1662:
1660:main links.
1657:
1637:
1629:
1614:
1583:
1575:
1570:This version
1568:
1565:What's next?
1557:
1547:
1540:
1531:
1513:
1502:
1495:
1482:
1479:
1476:
1460:
1452:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1393:
1385:
1369:
1365:
1358:
1356:
1349:
1342:
1335:
1322:
1309:
1301:
1284:
1281:
1272:
1265:
1258:
1251:
1244:
1222:
1214:
1194:
1191:
1184:
1177:
1170:
1163:
1156:
1147:
1139:
1126:
1112:
1097:
1081:
1073:
1042:
1034:
1002:
994:
984:
957:
954:
929:source check
908:
902:
889:
885:
881:
879:
852:
849:
831:
826:
824:
807:
805:
792:
786:
772:
754:
737:
731:
697:
694:Professional
679:
673:
647:
643:
639:
613:
608:
604:
577:
573:
569:
566:
556:
553:
526:
496:
493:
490:
487:
473:
469:
465:
442:Machine Rule
439:
433:Mwsilvabreen
428:
426:
416:
402:
361:
330:
324:
323:In Asimov's
309:
296:Tron (movie)
293:
288:
266:
254:Ryangallaher
234:
209:
169:
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
2695:22 May 2024
2597:24 May 2023
2547:Johncdraper
2399:Merge from
2095:AI takeover
1601:AI takeover
1179:Friendly AI
1142:friendly AI
896:Sourcecheck
855:AI takeover
700:—Preceding
650:—Preceding
509:Spyderalien
503:—Preceding
2736:Categories
2533:talk to me
2454:reply here
2200:Report bug
1609:WP:SUMMARY
1437:Thoughts?
1297:automation
966:Report bug
488:hi there!
450:The Matrix
325:Foundation
2670:Stevesuny
2464:See also
2319:Septagram
2264:layers.
2183:this tool
2176:this tool
2123:dead link
2073:Septagram
1329:posthuman
1116:Septagram
1057:Septagram
1018:Septagram
949:this tool
942:this tool
801:editorial
627:MadMaxDog
420:MadMaxDog
405:MapleTree
258:Tesjes167
2621:NoemieCY
2609:NoemieCY
2389:Rosguill
2384:signed,
2333:A.X.E.L.
2268:unsigned
2218:unsigned
2189:Cheers.—
1852:problem.
1605:WP:SPLIT
955:Cheers.—
808:Concerns
793:Concerns
702:unsigned
652:unsigned
582:unsigned
517:contribs
505:unsigned
379:contribs
367:unsigned
351:contribs
339:unsigned
327:universe
310:planning
274:PrimeBOT
185:Robotics
176:Robotics
148:Robotics
2543:Oppose.
2522:Oppose.
2479:Laundry
2127:tag to
2099:my edit
1545:below.
882:checked
859:my edit
810:with {{
212:on the
123:on the
30:C-class
2719:Zq2197
2707:Zq2197
2560:Oppose
2528:Minkai
2425:Oppose
2296:WP:DUE
2119:Added
1420:TOP500
890:failed
300:Abdull
36:scale.
2482:Pizza
676:WP:OR
617:Grahn
454:Bryan
388:Kizor
314:Bryan
2723:talk
2697:and
2674:talk
2648:and
2625:talk
2599:and
2551:talk
2511:talk
2472:and
2353:talk
2345:talk
2323:talk
2304:talk
2276:talk
2242:talk
2226:talk
2077:talk
1658:both
1120:Kbog
1118:and
1061:talk
1022:talk
886:true
837:Link
820:rude
816:bold
812:Tone
761:talk
735:peak
710:talk
660:talk
590:talk
541:talk
513:talk
375:talk
347:talk
289:Tron
278:talk
244:and
204:High
2713:).
2664:).
2615:).
2476:. –
2427:).
2210:AGI
2157:RfC
2113:to
1950:Bog
1897:Bog
1826:Bog
1773:Bog
1759:Not
1695:Bog
1639:Bog
1585:Bog
1462:Bog
1395:Bog
1311:Bog
1224:Bog
1208:or
1083:Bog
1044:Bog
1004:Bog
923:RfC
900:).
888:or
873:to
818:to
799:or
741:ree
682:LOL
670:OR?
429:let
381:) .
353:) .
272:by
115:Mid
2738::
2725:)
2676:)
2627:)
2564:—
2553:)
2513:)
2499:)
2496:c̄
2485:03
2429:—
2355:)
2325:)
2306:)
2278:)
2244:)
2228:)
2170:.
2165:}}
2161:{{
2125:}}
2121:{{
2079:)
1511:.
1212:.
1063:)
1024:)
936:.
931:}}
927:{{
898:}}
894:{{
763:)
712:)
662:)
592:)
543:)
519:)
515:•
377:•
349:•
280:)
264:.
260:,
2721:(
2709:(
2672:(
2660:(
2623:(
2611:(
2549:(
2535:)
2531:(
2509:(
2491:d
2488:(
2451:|
2351:(
2343:(
2321:(
2313:@
2302:(
2290:@
2274:(
2240:(
2224:(
2202:)
2198:(
2185:.
2178:.
2075:(
1946:.
1942:K
1893:.
1889:K
1822:.
1818:K
1769:.
1765:K
1691:.
1687:K
1635:.
1631:K
1581:.
1577:K
1458:.
1454:K
1391:.
1387:K
1307:.
1303:K
1220:.
1216:K
1122::
1114:@
1079:.
1075:K
1059:(
1040:.
1036:K
1020:(
1000:.
996:K
968:)
964:(
951:.
944:.
759:(
738:F
732:S
708:(
658:(
596:.
588:(
539:(
511:(
373:(
345:(
276:(
216:.
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
