1391:
be missed. I added a portrait of
Whittaker and a photo of Einstein. The readable prose size is 48 kB, so it is in between the categories of "Length alone does not justify division" and "May need to be divided (likelihood goes up with size)". So I wasn't sure. If more content were to be added, I would say it definitely should split. The books have enough notability that each is separately notable, but I am not sure if anything else needs to be said about it. I am not sure either way, there are good arguments for both sides on this one. The main argument to keep it together is that the first volume of second edition is basically same as first edition and many of the references talk about both. I am open to suggestions, it is certainly a future possibility. Please let me know if you there are any more issues. Thanks again for taking the time to review the article!
553:
684:
244:
674:
543:
653:
512:
446:
816:
190:
1359:
1337:
1316:
1276:
1246:
1209:
1188:
1152:
1131:
1114:
1071:
1016:
943:
387:
436:
418:
370:
303:
1390:
Thank you for taking the time to review this! I have made changes to fix all of these problems, except for the one that begins "move", did you mean to put something else there? I ended up deleting a couple of problematic statements that did not seem particularly necessary for the article and so won't
1457:
was a mistake, I was thinking about asking to move the
Publication history/Release details to the end matter, but decided against it, since it seems more a matter of personal preference. I'm glad you've cut down on the praise somewhat. The article favors Whittaker's point of view a bit more than the
1498:
Thank you again for your careful review, I greatly appreciate the feedback and the promotion! I have changed the second paragraph of the lead to both add in a potential DYK statement and to make it clear that scientific consensus is not on
Whittaker's side in the intro. Let me know if you have any
1675:
Hi all, if any anyone has any ideas on the section titles I would be grateful. MOS says that at each level they have to be concise, but they also have to be unique to the page. They more or less have to conform to page title guidelines. I have found that balance somewhat difficult for this page
783:
1342:
The single image and caption are relevant, but a single picture is not enough. The images do not all have to be of the book itself, you can include some of the scientists/experiments/whatever you think is relevant. But surely you can find a few relevant illustrations to
1413:
I have made some additional edits fixing mistakes I saw and have reduced the number of times the word "praised" is used. I also ran it through Word for spelling and grammar to be safe. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to improve the page. Thanks again!
1503:
you have to add your name and keep track of the articles you review there to take part (it's not automatic). I saw you were reviewing one before you started mine, so I thought I would let you know in case you didn't see it or didn't know it wasn't automatic.
1161:
set forth the relativity theory of
Poincaré and Lorentz with some amplifications, and which attracted much attention", and he credited Einstein only with being the first to publish the correct relativistic formulas for stellar aberration and the Doppler
1571:
362:
153:
821:
776:
1541:, but the GA criteria are not so strict. As for the drive, I'm not personally interested in the review awards, but there's a pretty big backlog of GA reviews, so I agree that it's a good place to focus. Nice work with the article. 〈
44:
1432:
Looks good. I was taking some time to try to decisively tidy up the copyright status of the images, but it turns out to basically be a black hole of interacting copyright law from about a half dozen countries. Everything here
1442:
826:
1500:
715:
147:
1080:
Citing Max Born (1956), Gerald Holton (1960, 1964, 1968), Charles
Scribner (1964), Stanley Goldberg (1967, 1969), Elie Zahar (1973), Tetu Hirosige (1976), Kenneth F. Schaffner (1976), and Arthur I. Miller
960:- Give the full name of the scientist (not just last name) and wikilink their page on the first mention of them in a section. It's OK to use just the last name on second mention within a section, though.
872:
222:
984:
Infobox - are the different page numbers for the different editions? Better to clarify inline (1st ed.) (2nd ed., vol. 1) (2nd ed., vol. 2) if you can. Ditto for publication date and publisher.
1453:
Anyway, back to the article itself. You're right, I've accidentally conflated the article size with the prose size, so the article probably isn't too long in its current form. The word
1441:, I guess we have to settle for the generic US public domain tags on Whittaker, Born, and Lorentz. (e.g. apparently Whittaker's portrait was one of the portraits involved in the
1762:
1732:
1792:
750:
740:
338:
24:
1797:
1255:
section. But it's just surface style, the broader substance appears to be quite representative of the sources as far as I can tell. So no other concerns beyond that.
1767:
1006:
854:
168:
1787:
1676:(currently using parentheses to disambiguate sections). The obvious fix is to split the article up, but I still have a few strong reservations on that. Thanks!
710:
609:
135:
844:
634:
621:
526:
522:
903:
Barely a month old, but it's already in pretty good shape. You've put some serious work into this, Footlessmouse. I'm happy to look this over in detail. 〈
1777:
1306:
79:
129:
1757:
1737:
1108:
1010:
1002:
706:
697:
658:
599:
358:
201:
1727:
1438:
125:
1772:
994:
552:
1103:, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
85:
175:
1747:
1227:
territory. I can see a reasonable argument made to keep unified or split (probably by edition), but I'd like to hear your thoughts here.
466:
215:
1752:
1696:
921:
575:
1782:
1104:
1722:
998:
470:
141:
1364:
The article is close. On substance, I think enough good content is there, but the issues mentioned above should be addressed. 〈
1742:
849:
207:
99:
30:
1604:
1125:
893:
104:
20:
1445:, and wikimedia commons apparently doesn't have a generic UK public domain tag?) Even some pictures from featured articles
566:
517:
74:
1586:
Not sure what this is supposed to be, but if you're nominating this for a DYK, the instructions on how to do that are at
1035:
book established
Whittaker as a leading historian of science, he was also widely recognized as a preeminent mathematician
1708:
1685:
1662:
1635:
1617:
1553:
1513:
1478:
1423:
1400:
1376:
915:
897:
795:
791:
398:
1090:
More broadly, no need to list the publication place inline for any of the reviews - that's what the references are for.
1037:
Try to make this more substantial: the combination of "leading", "widely recognized", and "preeminent" is getting into
705:
content on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
702:
460:
423:
333:
281:
65:
1591:
1310:
1699:
to ask what the correct target of wave mechanics should be, as there doesn't appear to be a clear answer. Thanks!
1327:
1096:
990:
689:
285:
948:
Mostly clear, missing a few full names for scientists and wikilinks to technical terms with their own articles.
1298:
1220:
A parenthetical aside seems out of scope. Leaving a redlink is OK until somebody writes an article about him.
772:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1704:
1681:
1658:
1631:
1509:
1419:
1396:
1302:
1203:
1053:
787:
109:
1587:
1199:
1182:
868:
189:
963:
Other examples: "Fitzgerald" "Dyson, in his 1954 review,", "In his 1954 Nature review, Hagedorn notes "
404:
318:
1146:
1142:
474:
289:
161:
55:
574:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1700:
1677:
1654:
1627:
1600:
1581:
1549:
1532:
1505:
1474:
1415:
1392:
1372:
1331:
1270:
1076:
The references themselves are excellent. However, the text is a bit cluttered with citation info.
911:
887:
70:
302:
1107:, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
1064:
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
1224:
343:
211:
51:
1612:
1437:
be public domain, and is tagged as such, but while I was able to find more suitable tags on
1290:
243:
1626:
If anyone has any comments about DYK or the article in general, please let me know. Thanks!
1459:
925:
478:
351:
347:
252:
1458:
consensus history, but the article is specifically about his book, so that emphasis not
1608:
1243:
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
1236:
1165:
1084:
1065:
558:
673:
652:
1716:
1648:
1596:
1572:
Template:Did you know nominations/A History of the
Theories of Aether and Electricity
1542:
1538:
1493:
1467:
1446:
1408:
1365:
1252:
1028:
958:
still largely focuses on Descartes, Newton, Fermat, Hooke, and Huygens, among others.
904:
883:
768:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
363:
Template:Did you know nominations/A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity
445:
1100:
451:
1653:
Sorry about that. I was going to ask for comments after getting it ready. Thanks!
323:
542:
511:
777:
A history of the theories of aether and electricity. Whittacker E.T. (1910).pdf
679:
548:
441:
1462:
in this context. You've fixed the other issues I brought up, so I'm going to
940:
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
313:
875:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
280:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
435:
417:
1499:
concerns, given you just promoted it. Also, there is a drive going on at
1038:
1321:
Only picture is a correctly tagged image of a book in the public domain.
1448:
have the same over-generic tags, so I guess we just ignore the problem?
1269:
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
571:
465:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can
1443:
National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute
1537:
That's about it, thanks. Probably needs some more polishing before
1251:
The article is a little heavy on praise, as I mentioned in 1a
380:
297:
238:
184:
15:
1501:
WP:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/October 2020
873:
Talk:A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity/GA1
368:
1281:
A minor grammar fix recently, but otherwise pretty stable.
709:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1193:
Quite comprehensive coverage from the number of sources.
228:
361:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
160:
1218:
the namesake of the Sparrow criterion in spectroscopy
570:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1025:
Overview of Volume I, Reception of the first volume
310:
A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity
196:
A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity
25:
A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity
350:developed the theory of special relativity before
1592:Template talk:Did you know#To nominate an article
1223:At just under 88kb, the article is flirting with
1136:Article seems to follow from the sources nicely.
214:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
477:. To improve this article, please refer to the
782:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
716:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
174:
8:
1763:GA-Class physics articles of Low-importance
1733:Knowledge articles that use British English
1202:without going into unnecessary detail (see
1167:. Should be rephrased. The rest seems fine.
1793:Low-importance history of science articles
804:
647:
506:
473:. To use this banner, please refer to the
412:
256:, which has its own spelling conventions (
701:, an attempt to improve and organize the
326:). The text of the entry was as follows:
725:Knowledge:WikiProject History of Science
471:discuss matters related to book articles
359:Knowledge:Recent additions/2020/November
1798:WikiProject History of Science articles
835:
807:
728:Template:WikiProject History of Science
649:
508:
479:relevant guideline for the type of work
414:
1768:GA-Class physics publications articles
1695:Hi all, I have opened a discussion on
1217:
1160:
1079:
1034:
1024:
978:
973:Platonic and Aristotelian philosophies
972:
966:
957:
951:
357:A record of the entry may be seen at
288:, this should not be changed without
7:
1788:GA-Class history of science articles
564:This article is within the scope of
457:This article is within the scope of
386:
384:
1288:Is it illustrated, if possible, by
403:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
969:- reformat to hide disambiguation
14:
1778:GA-Class physics history articles
1083:- No need for dates in the text,
369:
210:. If you can improve it further,
1357:
1335:
1314:
1274:
1244:
1207:
1186:
1150:
1129:
1112:
1069:
1014:
941:
682:
672:
651:
551:
541:
510:
444:
434:
416:
385:
301:
242:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1758:Low-importance physics articles
1738:Knowledge Did you know articles
745:This article has been rated as
604:This article has been rated as
1728:Natural sciences good articles
1109:scientific citation guidelines
1027:- Simplify section titles per
713:. You can also help with the
698:History of Science WikiProject
202:Natural sciences good articles
198:has been listed as one of the
1:
1773:Physics publications articles
1709:22:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
1686:09:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
1164:is the same phrasing used at
1157:One sentence seems too close:
632:This article is supported by
619:This article is supported by
584:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
578:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1663:05:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
1636:05:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
1618:05:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
1554:19:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
1514:06:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
1479:02:40, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
1424:23:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
1401:04:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
1377:02:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
1358:
1336:
1315:
1275:
1245:
1208:
1187:
1151:
1130:
1113:
1087:style refs are depreciated.
1070:
1015:
942:
916:01:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
898:01:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
695:This article is part of the
587:Template:WikiProject Physics
322:column on 14 November 2020 (
796:03:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
731:history of science articles
487:Knowledge:WikiProject Books
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1814:
1748:WikiProject Books articles
1569:
1066:the layout style guideline
967:Thomas Preston (scientist)
751:project's importance scale
610:project's importance scale
490:Template:WikiProject Books
1753:GA-Class physics articles
1307:valid fair use rationales
952:Chapter 4 convers the...
744:
690:History of science portal
667:
631:
618:
603:
536:
429:
411:
334:a famous priority dispute
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1783:Physics history articles
1031:. The rest are similar.
1021:A couple things to fix:
989:B. It complies with the
312:appeared on Knowledge's
1723:Knowledge good articles
1330:to the topic, and have
1105:likely to be challenged
975:- add inline wikilinks
1743:GA-Class Book articles
1588:Knowledge:Did you know
622:Publications Taskforce
393:This article is rated
374:
75:avoid personal attacks
1176:broad in its coverage
372:
226:: October 23, 2020. (
208:good article criteria
100:Neutral point of view
1273:or content dispute:
1200:focused on the topic
1181:A. It addresses the
1143:copyright violations
1126:no original research
1059:no original research
336:, E. T. Whittaker's
332:... that as part of
286:relevant style guide
282:varieties of English
105:No original research
1697:WikiProject Physics
567:WikiProject Physics
284:. According to the
1141:D. It contains no
1011:list incorporation
979:old quantum theory
788:Community Tech bot
722:History of Science
703:history of science
659:History of Science
399:content assessment
375:
86:dispute resolution
47:
1332:suitable captions
1309:are provided for
1097:in-line citations
863:
862:
765:
764:
761:
760:
757:
756:
646:
645:
642:
641:
635:History Taskforce
505:
504:
501:
500:
461:WikiProject Books
379:
378:
296:
295:
237:
236:
233:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1805:
1652:
1616:
1585:
1536:
1497:
1412:
1361:
1360:
1339:
1338:
1318:
1317:
1311:non-free content
1303:copyright status
1278:
1277:
1248:
1247:
1211:
1210:
1190:
1189:
1154:
1153:
1133:
1132:
1119:Well-referenced.
1116:
1115:
1101:reliable sources
1073:
1072:
1018:
1017:
945:
944:
817:Copyvio detector
805:
733:
732:
729:
726:
723:
692:
687:
686:
685:
676:
669:
668:
663:
655:
648:
592:
591:
590:physics articles
588:
585:
582:
561:
556:
555:
545:
538:
537:
532:
529:
514:
507:
495:
494:
491:
488:
485:
467:join the project
454:
449:
448:
438:
431:
430:
420:
413:
396:
390:
389:
388:
381:
371:
305:
298:
249:This article is
246:
239:
231:
229:Reviewed version
220:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1813:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1713:
1712:
1693:
1673:
1646:
1595:
1579:
1574:
1568:
1546:
1530:
1491:
1471:
1406:
1369:
1124:C. It contains
993:guidelines for
991:manual of style
908:
867:This review is
859:
831:
803:
784:nomination page
770:
730:
727:
724:
721:
720:
688:
683:
681:
661:
589:
586:
583:
580:
579:
557:
550:
530:
520:
492:
489:
486:
483:
482:
450:
443:
397:on Knowledge's
394:
352:Albert Einstein
348:Hendrik Lorentz
290:broad consensus
253:British English
227:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1811:
1809:
1801:
1800:
1795:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1725:
1715:
1714:
1692:
1691:Wave mechanics
1689:
1672:
1671:Section titles
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1621:
1620:
1567:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1544:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1469:
1450:
1449:
1427:
1426:
1386:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1367:
1356:Pass or Fail:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1326:B. Images are
1324:
1323:
1322:
1297:A. Images are
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1221:
1215:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1185:of the topic:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1158:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1077:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1032:
1022:
1003:words to watch
987:
986:
985:
982:
976:
970:
964:
961:
955:
949:
906:
902:
878:
877:
861:
860:
858:
857:
852:
847:
841:
838:
837:
833:
832:
830:
829:
827:External links
824:
819:
813:
810:
809:
802:
799:
780:
779:
769:
766:
763:
762:
759:
758:
755:
754:
747:Low-importance
743:
737:
736:
734:
694:
693:
677:
665:
664:
662:Low‑importance
656:
644:
643:
640:
639:
630:
627:
626:
617:
614:
613:
606:Low-importance
602:
596:
595:
593:
576:the discussion
563:
562:
559:Physics portal
546:
534:
533:
531:Low‑importance
515:
503:
502:
499:
498:
496:
456:
455:
439:
427:
426:
421:
409:
408:
402:
391:
377:
376:
366:
356:
355:
344:Henri Poincaré
306:
294:
293:
247:
235:
234:
219:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1810:
1799:
1796:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1726:
1724:
1721:
1720:
1718:
1711:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1701:Footlessmouse
1698:
1690:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1678:Footlessmouse
1670:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1655:Footlessmouse
1650:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1628:Footlessmouse
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1619:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1593:
1589:
1583:
1582:Footlessmouse
1578:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1565:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1540:
1534:
1533:Footlessmouse
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:Footlessmouse
1502:
1495:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1465:
1461:
1456:
1452:
1451:
1447:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1416:Footlessmouse
1410:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:Footlessmouse
1389:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1363:
1362:
1355:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1341:
1340:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1293:
1292:
1287:
1280:
1279:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1265:
1261:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1242:
1241:
1239:
1238:
1233:
1226:
1219:
1213:
1212:
1205:
1204:summary style
1201:
1197:
1192:
1191:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1173:
1166:
1163:
1156:
1155:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1135:
1134:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1117:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1086:
1082:
1075:
1074:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1029:MOS:NOBACKREF
1026:
1020:
1019:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
995:lead sections
992:
988:
980:
974:
968:
959:
953:
947:
946:
939:
938:
936:
932:
931:
930:
929:
927:
924:review – see
923:
918:
917:
913:
909:
900:
899:
895:
892:
889:
885:
882:
876:
874:
870:
865:
864:
856:
853:
851:
848:
846:
843:
842:
840:
839:
834:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
814:
812:
811:
806:
800:
798:
797:
793:
789:
785:
778:
775:
774:
773:
767:
752:
748:
742:
739:
738:
735:
718:
717:
712:
708:
704:
700:
699:
691:
680:
678:
675:
671:
670:
666:
660:
657:
654:
650:
637:
636:
629:
628:
624:
623:
616:
615:
611:
607:
601:
598:
597:
594:
577:
573:
569:
568:
560:
554:
549:
547:
544:
540:
539:
535:
528:
524:
519:
516:
513:
509:
497:
493:Book articles
480:
476:
475:documentation
472:
468:
464:
463:
462:
453:
447:
442:
440:
437:
433:
432:
428:
425:
422:
419:
415:
410:
406:
400:
392:
383:
382:
367:
364:
360:
353:
349:
345:
342:claimed that
341:
340:
335:
331:
328:
327:
325:
321:
320:
315:
311:
307:
304:
300:
299:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
248:
245:
241:
240:
230:
225:
224:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
197:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1694:
1674:
1575:
1566:Did you know
1463:
1454:
1434:
1387:
1385:
1350:
1289:
1263:
1235:
1198:B. It stays
1183:main aspects
1175:
1058:
1052:
981:- wikilink.
935:well written
934:
928:for criteria
920:
919:
901:
890:
880:
879:
866:
855:Instructions
781:
771:
746:
714:
707:project page
696:
633:
620:
605:
565:
523:Publications
459:
458:
452:Books portal
405:WikiProjects
337:
330:Did you know
329:
319:Did you know
317:
309:
308:A fact from
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
250:
221:
212:please do so
200:
199:
195:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1570:Main page:
1301:with their
1214:Two things:
869:transcluded
324:check views
251:written in
148:free images
31:not a forum
1717:Categories
1466:review. 〈
1225:WP:TOOLONG
1147:plagiarism
1054:verifiable
1041:territory.
954:fix typo.
822:Authorship
808:GA toolbox
711:discussion
206:under the
1099:are from
881:Reviewer:
845:Templates
836:Reviewing
801:GA Review
373:Knowledge
339:1953 book
314:Main Page
262:travelled
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1649:Headbomb
1597:Headbomb
1494:Forbes72
1460:WP:UNDUE
1439:Poincaré
1409:Forbes72
1328:relevant
1271:edit war
1039:MOS:PUFF
926:WP:WIAGA
894:contribs
884:Forbes72
850:Criteria
395:GA-class
274:artefact
216:reassess
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1435:appears
1351:Overall
1237:neutral
1162:effect.
1095:B. All
1085:WP:HARV
1081:(1981).
1007:fiction
749:on the
608:on the
581:Physics
572:Physics
527:History
518:Physics
316:in the
278:analyse
270:defence
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1543:Forbes
1539:WP:FAC
1468:Forbes
1366:Forbes
1305:, and
1299:tagged
1291:images
1264:stable
1262:Is it
1253:WP:WTW
1234:Is it
1222:-: -->
1216:-: -->
1174:Is it
1159:-: -->
1089:-: -->
1078:-: -->
1051:Is it
1043:-: -->
1033:-: -->
1023:-: -->
1009:, and
999:layout
983:-: -->
977:-: -->
971:-: -->
965:-: -->
962:-: -->
956:-: -->
950:-: -->
933:Is it
905:Forbes
401:scale.
266:centre
258:colour
223:Review
126:Google
1057:with
871:from
484:Books
424:Books
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1705:talk
1682:talk
1659:talk
1632:talk
1550:Talk
1510:talk
1475:Talk
1464:pass
1455:move
1420:talk
1397:talk
1388:Note
1373:Talk
1343:add.
1145:nor
1044:Move
912:Talk
888:talk
792:talk
469:and
346:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1594:.
1206:):
786:. —
741:Low
600:Low
218:it.
176:TWL
1719::
1707:)
1684:)
1661:)
1634:)
1611:·
1607:·
1603:·
1590:/
1552:〉
1548:|
1545:72
1512:)
1477:〉
1473:|
1470:72
1422:)
1399:)
1375:〉
1371:|
1368:72
1353::
1334::
1313::
1294:?
1266:?
1240:?
1178:?
1149::
1128::
1111::
1068::
1061:?
1013::
1005:,
1001:,
997:,
937:?
922:GA
914:〉
910:|
907:72
896:)
794:)
525:/
521::
276:,
272:,
268:,
264:,
260:,
232:).
156:)
54:;
1703:(
1680:(
1657:(
1651::
1647:@
1630:(
1615:}
1613:b
1609:p
1605:c
1601:t
1599:{
1584::
1580:@
1535::
1531:@
1508:(
1496::
1492:@
1418:(
1411::
1407:@
1395:(
891:·
886:(
790:(
753:.
719:.
638:.
625:.
612:.
481:.
407::
365:.
354:?
292:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
