Knowledge

Talk:A Star Is Born (2018 film)

Source 📝

2155:
several weeks without access to a computer, and since two editors have now read the article, you are in a position to make any further "bold" edits as needed to give consideration to pass the article. I am comfortable that both of you have made a full read through of the article, and you can add any material you feel would make the article pass here. BlueMoonset, if you could coordinate this then I have some good faith that its very close to completion. Otherwise, you can pass/not pass the article at this time since I will not be around for at least several weeks and the article should not languish indefinitely if it this close to completion as the original reviewer stated above. It was nice to add the edit requests which you made overnight and to make the further upgrades to the article.
439: 418: 641: 390: 538: 507: 1632:. If you have any questions then you can leave them here for BlueMoonset or me to get to. Also, BlueMoonset may have further edits which he might place directly place into the article or comments on the article, as he feels is best, which is fine and expected from experienced editors. Let me know if you spot more items in the article which need attention before using the GAN instructions for passing/not passing this article. Looking forward to any more comments on the article. 548: 681: 219: 693: 320: 296: 2176:, whether this was a US film intended for US audiences or not, the fact remains that the international gross was higher than the US revenue, which means that it needs to be given due attention: in short, more than what's given here. I've made a few specific notes above where more work is needed; I hope you're still around to look at things, since your reply was posted less than an hour ago. 1723:
numbers will have been rounded for the article). In addition, it's possible that Cooper received some money in 2018, maybe even many millions, since the movie had made much of its money then. (Note that $ 39.9 million is more than the budget of the entire film, and approaching 10% of the worldwide gross.) I think you need to get more specific information here with better sourcing.
653: 330: 265: 1210: 1112:
name back after the divorce is granted. In this case, the plot of the film goes in the other direction with Gaga growing up with her father as the single parent and not her mother. With reliable cites going with Ally Campana as the maiden name, then it might be worth a mention with a cite added in the Casting section. Maybe you can make an edit with improved wording.
959:
It is claimed that the film is ‘A remake of the 1937 film of the same name’, but this is not accurate. In the credits for the film, they mention the script for the 1954 and 1976 versions of the film, but explicitly not the 1937 version. A better way to state the above, would be ‘A remake based on the
1627:
and his allegations, this type of matter is usually dealt with on the biography page for the person involved and usually only with reliable citations. In this case the reliable citations are available and were put into his biography article by another editor. The issue has not had appreciable effect
1137:
is overall a trustworthy source, they also don't have any discernible basis for "Campana". As for mothers' maiden names, it is true that doesn't happen much outside of cases where the mother has full custody or the child has a poor/strained relationship with the father, but you still shouldn't be so
2271:
had to go out of town after February 11, and I really thought he'd be back by this time—it looks like "at least several weeks" translates to more than nine weeks (how much more beyond nine I wouldn't care to guess). In any event, it was important to know how close to meeting the GA criteria someone
2222:
I've been asked to leave comments here. I haven't seen the film, so I wouldn't normally volunteer to do this review. However, a quick read and at the moment I feel this would fail based on coverage - there is next to nothing on filming and music. There's usually a wealth of information on these for
1795:
Writing: There's almost nothing here. The infobox lists the writers as Eric Roth, Bradley Cooper, and Will Fetters, but only the latter is mentioned in the sole sentence, and that dates back to 2012, long before Cooper was attached to the project. This needs significant expansion, not least if Roth
1375:
According to your link it is. Verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view are Knowledge's core content policies. This article seems to respect it and was what I was looking for. Without being mesmerized by its writing it was thorough, and better than other good articles I've seen
1128:
Again, the film doesn't at any point call her by that last name, not even during the credits where she's just listed as "Ally". That was the bigger point I'm trying to make and you seem to be missing. I also have no recollection of anybody in the movie calling Ally's father "Campana" either nor any
1016:
SNUGGUMS; The character of Ally played by Gaga starts the movie as portraying the daughter of Andrew Dice Clay as Lorenzo Campana, Ally's father. Her name changes midway through the film after the marriage. Since she appears as both the pre-marriage character and the after marriage character in the
2201:
being the only other film to outpace it at the foreign box office. I have added it into the text. I am to be without a computer starting this evening and prior to going out of town and hope to hear from you over the next hour or two since you appear to be on-line. If you have time, I can try to do
1749:
The additional detail for Cooper's directorial debut and not getting upfront is useful; thank you. The $ 39.9 million figure is still there, however, and that precise a number is not adequately supported by the source. I'm also not sure that it should be called a "salary", since whatever the total
1674:
The link to the split off "Accolades" article for this film contains a large amount of that documentation. I can trip some of that discussion from the lede section since it is already covered in the fully linked article for the film's accolades. You can abridge this further as needed if the linked
1111:
also taking a position that it is Ally Campana. When I asked someone about your name change comment above, their position was that changing back to the maiden name of a mother is rare and usually only happens when after a divorce the child is in the custody of the mother and the mother changes her
1031:
You can't just presume one automatically shares their father's last name. Children can sometimes have their mother's last names instead even outside of cases where a father and/or child changes a last name for non-marriage purposes. Also, Ally is never at any point referred to with that last name,
2154:
That was a nice read though you did yesterday and I have tried to address each one of your comments with added sources and links. The previous editor of the new Accolades page seems to have left more in the article than is needed after the page split, which I have trimmed. I am to be away now for
2084:
Accolades: Again, you shouldn't have more info in the intro than you do here, so this section needs at least to mention the Academy Award and Golden Globe wins as well as anything else covered in the intro; indeed, it would probably be better to move some of the detail out of the intro and down
1722:
Pre-production: The final sentence of this section relies on the Forbes source, and the $ 39.9 million figure in the article is exactly 70% of Cooper's $ 56 million total earnings for 2019. That's more than you can safely conclude from this information in the source, and it's far too exact (the
2111:
There's a lot of detail left still in the intro; as I said above, you should move some of it down into the Accolades section, and I'm disappointed that you still don't mention the actual awards won here. There's no way this section could be considered adequate without them and the significant
1415:
I choose this article because I am not interested in it, but quite familiar with it's notability we all had a friend who loved it. I haven't seen it, nor am I a fan of the lead actors. So neutrality and being a pleasant read are my key ingredient to judge this specific article. Also it fits
1730:
My rewording of that material should clarify most of this regarding the pre-production negotiation. The back-end profits for actors are a separate discussion which is covered at the level of the financial aspects of the film's box office success covered in later sections in the article.
1891:
sentence does not contain the quote given here. If you're going to retain the quoted phrase (including the very odd-looking "+"), a valid source citation is needed. You could just given the information in your own words and avoid the quoted phrase, though you will need to find a source
2092:
That was left over by the previous editor in the lede section after the article split was made for the Accolades page for this film. I have trimmed it a little further, and you can remove more of it since it is all covered in the new Accolades page made for this film last year.
2272:
else thought this was. Since you think the coverage is inadequate, I think it should be failed for now. CodexJustin, when he returns, can work on the issues you've noted and renominate it once they've been addressed. Do you agree? If so, I'll take care of closing it. Thanks.
1841:
Filming: It should certainly be possible to get more than a start date for filming: what about the end date for principal shooting? Any prominent location shooting? Also, the lede/intro mentions that filming started at the 2017 Coachella, and that should certainly be here as
2131:
That's what I've found after spending a couple of hours looking through the article, and there may well be more, but I'm out of time. It might be a good idea to have another, even more experienced reviewer (one who's done a few movie articles) to look through as well.
1138:
quick to just assume a child will automatically have their father's last name when he has any custody. Parents and children can theoretically have their last names legally changed to something completely unconnected to their families so I wouldn't rule that out.
1971:
Home release and streaming has been available for an extended time now. Many services such as netflix are not really as forthcoming on the breakdown of market share, which I am learning from their other recent releases such as The Irishman recently with DeNiro.
1963:
Home media: There's nothing here about the revenue brought in by the digital downloads and DVD/Bluray/etc. discs. I've known GA nominations that were said to be "too soon" because the media release hadn't yet occurred, so the information probably ought to be
1796:
was the first-credited writer. Did Fetters stay on the project to the end, or did they just use some of his 2012 script? There needs to be more. (If there weren't more, then the sentence should be combined into another section where it fits.)
1899:
Since the main article for the soundtrack has been split off, then its likely best to keep the main material there and trim the extra text from this film article. It was likely left over from before the article split by a previous editor.
1628:
on the film production here in this film which mostly involved persons without those types of issues. Once you are comfortable with the article, then you might read the "Instructions tab" for passing/not passing article in the link for
1658:
I've made some copyedits to the article. Some terms were unclear, so I rephrased to avoid jargon. There were also places where more information is needed, and a couple where the sources don't support the material. Here's what I found:
153: 1588:
Two things I have noticed is that it seems they were controversy regarding the right owner of the film who had allegations of sexual misconduct. That citation is used in the infobox. I don't know how important it is to
1667:, one of the GA criteria in the "well-written" section, material should typically be in the body of the article if it's also in the intro, and you might want to consider moving some of the material from intro to body. 1445:
Please cut the outline in half you spoiled the ending. From the point where she meets the producer just explained in one paragraph the types of positions the characters will be in and don't spoil the ending.
1461:
Other wise the intro is fine, the cast section is fine, and production which I've just reread now. The first few citations are fine but a few have sources that I have never heard of, but they seem legit.
1697:
This needs to be rephrase, since Ally's new image wouldn't be nominated for Grammys; it also isn't clear whether Ally has already been nominated at the time they fight, or if the nominations come after.
1990:
My point is that some revenue information should be available, and therefore included. If the downloads or services revenues aren't available, the media sold in box stores and the like should be.
1001:
The following discussion is moved from my user talk page following the deletion of "Ally Campana" as her character's maiden name in the cast list in the main article here. Still not cleared up.
2202:
further edits at least for another hour or two. If you can do any bold edits appropriate to the article then it looks ok for you to do them with your other edits and comments being on target.
1889:
The studio announced that the album "features 19 songs in a wide range of musical styles + 15 dialogue tracks that will take you on a journey that mirrors the experience of seeing the film."
1215: 2409: 2042:
Meaning has just received a rewrite from me which was previously not accurate. Roeper is making a simple comparison between the versions of the film, which I have stated more plainly now.
877: 1539:
which he may refer to when or after making any comments about the article matching up against the criteria for assessment. Looking forward to comments from the editors participating.
1925:
See my Home media comments below. For a US film intended to US audiences, then this might me sufficient since Box office did not have a large spur after the awards season was over.
782: 578: 2223:
many recent blockbusters, particularly multiple Oscar-winning, and especially when the filming and music are particularly important to the film. I also did the review for the song
1133:. Comments from the actors/writers would be better things to go by in this case (if I've missed something and someone involved in the movie has mentioned it). While I do know that 767: 147: 867: 666: 517: 399: 306: 1849:
Material was added by me after you pointed this out to me. I have also linked the photographer's name for further information and aded a quote about his close work with Cooper.
1333:. It is not about whether the article covers the film, but whether it does so per the actual criteria. So it needs to be well-written (including not having grammatical errors), 1337:
and without original research or close paraphrasing, broad in its coverage, neutral, and so on. Please be sure to carefully check the article against all the criteria. Thanks.
862: 842: 2064:
reading oddly since this movie is one of three remakes, and being "one of the best" of three isn't much of a compliment at all, even though I think a compliment is intended.
2010:
Box office: There should be a bit more on the international release; I've added a bit, but there could be more, including at least a few more countries and their revenues.
595: 44: 2017:
Your add is pretty good. Since this was primarily a US production for English speaking audiences, then your add about the domestic market seems useful and well targeted.
892: 2035:
Critical response: In the third paragraph, "and remarked the film as one of the best iterations to its 1937, 1954, and the 1976 versions" needs to be entirely rewritten.
2414: 671: 1248: 917: 2404: 1867:
Why still no mention of Coachella here? If it's important enough for the intro, you absolutely need to include it here, and it's a useful and interesting detail.
1821:
You still have nothing about Eric Roth or about the writing in general. You really should: a movie script is a critical facet of a movie, and is needed for a GA.
1490:, I'll do my best to read through the article in the next few days to see how it matches up against the criteria and post here when I've done so. Your request to 1220: 631: 621: 1803:
This should not have been made a separate section by the previous editor. It belongs in the Pre=production section and in merged into that section at this time.
2374: 1238: 1312:
Let me know how the citations look when you have a chance to take an overall look. Let me know about your edit requests or modification when you are ready.
2434: 2389: 585: 479: 762: 489: 79: 927: 878:
https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment/news/international-news/article/bradley-cooper-creates-history-at-the-bafta-awards-with-a-star-is-born/344927
1918:
Release section: The information in both subsections is U.S.-centric; is there nothing international that can be included for Theatrical or Home media?
2369: 897: 190: 2227:, from this film, and believe that article is longer than this one. Before I go watch it/add comments, I'd like to see more in these sections added. 902: 817: 2424: 887: 711: 590: 2399: 2394: 1402:
As I am new doing this I did not expect to make the final call, but expected several people to look over it and vote. But if it's not let me know.
783:
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/a-star-is-born-bradley-cooper-grammy-scene-fake-drunk-lady-gaga-directed-a8647931.html
230: 768:
https://www.indiewire.com/2018/10/a-star-is-born-how-bradley-cooper-edited-lady-gaga-performances-of-shallow-and-ill-never-love-again-1202015586/
787: 1695:
Later, Jack and Ally fight after he drunkenly voices his disapproval of Ally's new image and music, which is nominated for three Grammy Awards.
868:
https://www.hellomagazine.com/healthandbeauty/makeup/2019011166514/lady-gaga-makeup-artist-reveals-surprising-process-a-star-is-born-character/
2429: 2359: 1535:
Thanks for following up on the comments from BlueMoonset. I think he is also referring to the guidelines listed in the instructions page for
752: 737: 85: 863:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2019/01/13/box-office-spider-man-mary-poppins-bumblebee-lady-gaga-mule-vice-oscars/#6e843abcb71c
843:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2018/12/12/box-office-bohemian-rhapsody-and-a-star-is-born-swallowed-up-the-entire-oscar-season/
983: 455: 742: 2384: 1266: 1084:
I hadn't seen those pieces before, though they seem to be pulling that name out of nowhere when the film doesn't use it for her at all.
847: 561: 512: 241: 893:
https://www.officialcharts.com/chart-news/a-star-is-born-takes-centre-stage-as-it-debuts-at-number-1-on-the-official-film-chart__25610/
168: 2379: 1181: 812: 797: 573: 250: 907: 802: 135: 2419: 1287: 1065: 807: 772: 1498:). Indeed, a plot section that deliberately omits key plot points would seem to violate the first part of the broadness criteria. 822: 918:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/behind-screen/oscars-behind-screen-podcasts-a-star-is-born-bohemian-rhapsody-free-solo-1187968
747: 1243: 852: 446: 423: 348: 236: 99: 30: 2364: 1663:
Intro section: there is a fair amount of information that it given here that is not included in the body of the article. Per
1151: 1097: 1045: 104: 20: 1068: 882: 837: 569:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
2060:
The word "remarked" is still there, and doesn't work in this context; unfortunately, the rewrite has its own issues, with
706: 521: 360: 352: 129: 74: 827: 832: 276: 763:
https://www.goldderby.com/article/2018/jay-cassidy-editor-a-star-is-born-bradley-cooper-lady-gaga-interview-video-news/
438: 417: 65: 928:
https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/movies/8498642/a-star-is-born-disturbing-familiarity-lady-gaga-bradley-cooper
857: 757: 125: 1623:
That was a good catch, and twitter cites are usually not allowed so I replaced it with a proper citation. Regarding
922: 898:
https://www.seattletimes.com/entertainment/movies/now-streaming-a-star-is-born-shoplifters-can-you-ever-forgive-me/
356: 343: 301: 185: 24: 903:
https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2467131/how-a-star-is-born-filmed-those-concert-scenes-without-spoiling-the-songs
818:
https://www.screendaily.com/features/bradley-cooper-on-the-difficult-journey-behind-a-star-is-born/5135046.article
1943:
See below: as over half of the box office was international revenues, it's important and germane to the article.
1297:
Good article overall seems like everything I heard about it. One needs to check all citations. Seems fine to me.
932: 888:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/star-is-born-sound-mixer-steve-morrow-interview-1186824?utm_source=twitter
777: 199: 175: 1770:
Casting: I'm not sure why Halsey is listed here; she just had a cameo as herself, which is mentioned elsewhere.
987: 792: 788:
https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2462783/bradley-cooper-didnt-actually-know-how-to-sing-before-a-star-is-born
1185: 109: 1389:
If you notice anything that slip through the cracks let the nominator know. Didn't notice any typos either.
1262: 753:
https://www.eonline.com/news/958948/why-bradley-cooper-and-lady-gaga-had-to-remake-a-star-is-born-together
738:
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/features/lukas-nelson-talks-lady-gaga-neil-young-bradley-cooper-w518656
2312: 2277: 2207: 2181: 2160: 2137: 2117: 2098: 2069: 2047: 2022: 1995: 1977: 1948: 1930: 1905: 1872: 1854: 1826: 1808: 1782: 1755: 1736: 1709: 1680: 1637: 1607: 1565: 1544: 1503: 1466: 1421: 1342: 1317: 1302: 1281: 1117: 1075: 1022: 1006: 912: 282: 743:
https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/8469492/lady-gaga-bradley-cooper-entertainment-weekly-interview
1109: 141: 848:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2018/12/11/jennifer-lopez-reveals-will-smith-almost-made-star-born/
553: 961: 264: 979: 965: 813:
https://www.goldderby.com/article/2018/mark-ronson-a-star-is-born-shallow-interview-news-846257931/
798:
http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a871804/a-star-is-born-bradley-cooper-praises-lady-gaga-work/
640: 389: 161: 55: 2141: 1684: 908:
https://www.vox.com/first-person/2019/2/19/18225472/a-star-is-born-oscars-lady-gaga-bradley-cooper
803:
https://pagesix.com/2018/12/03/this-was-bradley-coopers-inspiration-for-singing-in-a-star-is-born/
454:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1145: 1091: 1039: 808:
https://ew.com/awards/2018/12/03/oscars-2019-sound-categories-star-is-born-quiet-place-first-man/
204: 70: 773:
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2018/11/a-star-is-born-bradley-cooper-lady-gaga-sam-elliott
537: 506: 872: 2298: 2255: 2232: 1495: 823:
https://variety.com/2018/film/news/sam-elliott-a-star-is-born-lady-gaga-table-read-1203084551/
246: 51: 1180:
Running time should be in two lines; 136 minutes (Theatrical Cut) 148 minutes (Extended Cut)
748:
https://www.nme.com/news/film/lady-gaga-says-working-bradley-cooper-star-born-changed-2364963
2308: 2288: 2273: 2268: 2245: 2203: 2192: 2177: 2173: 2156: 2149: 2133: 2113: 2094: 2065: 2043: 2018: 1991: 1973: 1944: 1926: 1901: 1868: 1850: 1822: 1804: 1778: 1751: 1732: 1705: 1676: 1633: 1618: 1603: 1561: 1555: 1540: 1530: 1499: 1491: 1487: 1462: 1442: 1417: 1359: 1338: 1326: 1313: 1298: 1277: 1113: 1071: 1018: 1002: 853:
https://www.thewrap.com/star-is-born-writer-eric-roth-working-with-bradley-cooper-lady-gaga/
201: 1330: 883:
https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2466224/how-a-star-is-born-was-shot-to-protect-lady-gaga
838:
https://okmagazine.com/photos/bradley-cooper-shares-jacket-a-star-is-born-japan-premiere/
2316: 2302: 2281: 2259: 2236: 2211: 2185: 2164: 2121: 2102: 2073: 2051: 2026: 1999: 1981: 1952: 1934: 1909: 1876: 1858: 1830: 1812: 1786: 1759: 1740: 1713: 1641: 1611: 1569: 1560:
I'll look forward to your comments when you have a chance to read through the article.
1548: 1507: 1470: 1425: 1346: 1321: 1306: 1291: 1189: 1157: 1121: 1103: 1079: 1051: 1026: 1010: 991: 969: 949: 939: 698: 1750:
figure was would have included profit sharing and other amounts beyond actual salary.
828:
https://filmmakermagazine.com/106432-a-star-is-born-cinematographer-matthew-libatique/
203: 2353: 1629: 1536: 1139: 1085: 1033: 833:
https://variety.com/2018/film/spotlight/shangela-steals-show-star-is-born-1203081582/
566: 1017:
film, with the name change, both names should appear in the character descriptions.
2294: 2264: 2251: 2228: 1362:
Thank you for keeping an eye to what I am doing, as it is my first time doing this.
680: 858:
https://www.vulture.com/2018/12/star-is-born-vox-lux-and-pop-music-as-villain.html
758:
https://ew.com/movies/2018/08/09/a-star-is-born-bradley-cooper-lady-gaga-ew-cover/
923:
https://ew.com/oscars/2019/02/17/a-star-is-born-message-lady-gaga-bradley-cooper/
347:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 1602:
Also a Twitter Tweet is used for citations. I am quite sure this is not allowed.
1334: 658: 335: 1329:, please note that for GA reviews, you need to review specifically against the 1624: 1494:
to cut the plot because of spoilers runs counter to Knowledge guidelines (see
933:
https://deadline.com/2019/03/a-star-is-born-box-office-profit-2018-1202580798/
688: 648: 543: 325: 319: 295: 1777:
Dropping cameo role, which likely should not have been added from the start.
1416:
everything I have heard and read about it. Let me know how you feel about it.
778:
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2018/11/a-star-is-born-behind-the-scenes
451: 1269:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 565:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 793:
https://variety.com/2018/film/news/a-star-is-born-imax-release-1203078987/
1664: 364: 2340: 913:
https://ew.com/tv/2019/02/19/amy-schumer-star-is-born-ally-billboard/
1693:
Plot section: the fourth paragraph has the following sentence:
258: 213: 205: 15: 873:
https://ew.com/movies/2019/01/10/sam-elliott-a-star-is-born/
679: 639: 388: 1070:. The article I think should go with reliable sources. 239:
at the time (April 18, 2020). There are suggestions on
160: 982:
is a studio credit on this film. Can we add that in?
1704:
Rewrite of that sentence as 2-3 separate sentences.
450:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 245:for improving the article. If you can improve it, 2410:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 363:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1108:SNUGGUMS; Now I am finding the NY Times here 667:WikiProject Film - American cinema task force 174: 8: 2062:one of the best versions of all the remakes 1198: 501: 412: 359:. To use this banner, please refer to the 290: 2415:Low-importance American cinema articles 2333: 1229: 1201: 960:1954 and 1976 films of the same name’. 503: 414: 292: 262: 2061: 1888: 1694: 1129:cast members using it when discussing 2405:Low-importance United States articles 2341:https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1517451/ 218: 7: 1887:Music: The citation given after the 1675:article in not sufficient for this. 975:MGM is a studio credit on this film. 559:This article is within the scope of 444:This article is within the scope of 341:This article is within the scope of 2375:American cinema task force articles 1267:Talk:A Star Is Born (2018 film)/GA1 1056:SNUGGUMS; Both reliable sources at 606:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 281:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2435:WikiProject United States articles 2390:High-importance Lady Gaga articles 2112:nominations, even with the split. 609:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 397:This article is supported by the 2370:C-Class American cinema articles 691: 651: 546: 536: 505: 437: 416: 357:regional and topical task forces 328: 318: 294: 263: 217: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2425:Low-importance Arizona articles 2197:That is actually accurate with 626:This article has been rated as 484:This article has been rated as 464:Knowledge:WikiProject Lady Gaga 2400:C-Class United States articles 2395:WikiProject Lady Gaga articles 467:Template:WikiProject Lady Gaga 1: 2307:Thanks. I've just closed it. 2212:19:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2186:18:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2165:17:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2142:08:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2122:18:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2103:17:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2074:18:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2052:17:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2027:16:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 2000:18:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1982:16:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1953:18:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1935:17:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1910:16:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1877:18:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1859:16:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1831:18:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1813:16:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1787:17:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1760:18:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1741:16:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1714:16:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1685:16:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 704:This article is supported by 664:This article is supported by 458:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2430:WikiProject Arizona articles 2360:Former good article nominees 1642:17:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 1612:19:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 1570:15:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 1549:16:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 1508:17:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC) 1471:06:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC) 1426:04:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC) 1347:22:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC) 1322:16:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 1307:21:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC) 1292:21:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC) 997:Does Ally have a maiden name 231:Media and drama good article 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2451: 2385:C-Class Lady Gaga articles 2317:03:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC) 2303:03:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC) 2282:03:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC) 632:project's importance scale 490:project's importance scale 400:American cinema task force 373:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 235:, but it did not meet the 225:A Star Is Born (2018 film) 25:A Star Is Born (2018 film) 2380:WikiProject Film articles 2260:22:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC) 2237:22:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC) 1032:not even in the credits. 950:05:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 687: 647: 625: 562:WikiProject United States 531: 483: 432: 396: 376:Template:WikiProject Film 313: 289: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2420:C-Class Arizona articles 1653: 1190:11:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC) 1158:15:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC) 1122:14:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC) 1104:19:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC) 1080:17:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC) 1052:17:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC) 1027:15:25, 30 May 2019 (UTC) 1011:17:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC) 992:20:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC) 567:United States of America 1064:disagree with you here 970:20:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 732:Sources for development 1654:BlueMoonset's comments 684: 644: 612:United States articles 393: 271:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2365:C-Class film articles 683: 643: 447:WikiProject Lady Gaga 392: 237:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 554:United States portal 105:No original research 2250:see comment above. 980:Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer 707:WikiProject Arizona 580:Articles Requested! 349:join the discussion 227:was nominated as a 1135:The New York Times 685: 645: 470:Lady Gaga articles 394: 277:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2293:That seems fair. 1257: 1256: 726: 725: 722: 721: 718: 717: 500: 499: 496: 495: 411: 410: 407: 406: 351:and see lists of 257: 256: 249:; it may then be 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2442: 2343: 2338: 2292: 2249: 2196: 2153: 1622: 1559: 1534: 1211:Copyvio detector 1199: 955:The film’s basis 947: 701: 696: 695: 694: 661: 656: 655: 654: 614: 613: 610: 607: 604: 556: 551: 550: 549: 540: 533: 532: 527: 524: 509: 502: 472: 471: 468: 465: 462: 441: 434: 433: 428: 420: 413: 381: 380: 377: 374: 371: 344:WikiProject Film 338: 333: 332: 331: 322: 315: 314: 309: 298: 291: 274: 268: 267: 259: 221: 220: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2450: 2449: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2339: 2335: 2286: 2243: 2190: 2147: 1656: 1616: 1553: 1528: 1261:This review is 1253: 1225: 1197: 1178: 999: 977: 957: 940: 734: 697: 692: 690: 657: 652: 650: 611: 608: 605: 602: 601: 600: 586:Become a Member 552: 547: 545: 525: 515: 486:High-importance 469: 466: 463: 460: 459: 427:High‑importance 426: 378: 375: 372: 369: 368: 334: 329: 327: 304: 275:on Knowledge's 272: 242:the review page 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2448: 2446: 2438: 2437: 2432: 2427: 2422: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2372: 2367: 2362: 2352: 2351: 2345: 2344: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2240: 2239: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2168: 2167: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2106: 2105: 2087: 2086: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2055: 2054: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1985: 1984: 1966: 1965: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1938: 1937: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1894: 1893: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1862: 1861: 1844: 1843: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1816: 1815: 1798: 1797: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1744: 1743: 1725: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1699: 1698: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1669: 1668: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1551: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1296: 1272: 1271: 1255: 1254: 1252: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1224: 1223: 1221:External links 1218: 1213: 1207: 1204: 1203: 1196: 1193: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1131:A Star Is Born 998: 995: 984:98.235.131.222 976: 973: 956: 953: 936: 935: 930: 925: 920: 915: 910: 905: 900: 895: 890: 885: 880: 875: 870: 865: 860: 855: 850: 845: 840: 835: 830: 825: 820: 815: 810: 805: 800: 795: 790: 785: 780: 775: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 745: 740: 733: 730: 728: 724: 723: 720: 719: 716: 715: 712:Low-importance 703: 702: 699:Arizona portal 686: 676: 675: 672:Low-importance 663: 662: 646: 636: 635: 628:Low-importance 624: 618: 617: 615: 599: 598: 593: 588: 583: 576: 574:Template Usage 570: 558: 557: 541: 529: 528: 526:Low‑importance 510: 498: 497: 494: 493: 482: 476: 475: 473: 456:the discussion 442: 430: 429: 421: 409: 408: 405: 404: 395: 385: 384: 382: 340: 339: 323: 311: 310: 299: 287: 286: 280: 269: 255: 254: 222: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2447: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2428: 2426: 2423: 2421: 2418: 2416: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2361: 2358: 2357: 2355: 2342: 2337: 2334: 2330: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2290: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2270: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2247: 2242: 2241: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2220: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2200: 2194: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2151: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2083: 2082: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1962: 1961: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1840: 1839: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1794: 1793: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1768: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1626: 1620: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1557: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1532: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1444: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1376:to be honest. 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1276: 1270: 1268: 1264: 1259: 1258: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1234: 1233: 1228: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1206: 1205: 1200: 1194: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1175: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1149: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1136: 1132: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1095: 1094: 1089: 1088: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1060:and also at 1059: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1043: 1042: 1037: 1036: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1004: 996: 994: 993: 989: 985: 981: 974: 972: 971: 967: 963: 954: 952: 951: 948: 946: 943: 934: 931: 929: 926: 924: 921: 919: 916: 914: 911: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 891: 889: 886: 884: 881: 879: 876: 874: 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 859: 856: 854: 851: 849: 846: 844: 841: 839: 836: 834: 831: 829: 826: 824: 821: 819: 816: 814: 811: 809: 806: 804: 801: 799: 796: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 744: 741: 739: 736: 735: 731: 729: 713: 710:(assessed as 709: 708: 700: 689: 682: 678: 677: 673: 670:(assessed as 669: 668: 660: 649: 642: 638: 637: 633: 629: 623: 620: 619: 616: 603:United States 597: 594: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 581: 577: 575: 572: 571: 568: 564: 563: 555: 544: 542: 539: 535: 534: 530: 523: 519: 514: 513:United States 511: 508: 504: 491: 487: 481: 478: 477: 474: 457: 453: 449: 448: 443: 440: 436: 435: 431: 425: 422: 419: 415: 402: 401: 391: 387: 386: 383: 379:film articles 366: 362: 361:documentation 358: 354: 350: 346: 345: 337: 326: 324: 321: 317: 316: 312: 308: 303: 300: 297: 293: 288: 284: 278: 270: 266: 261: 260: 252: 248: 244: 243: 238: 234: 233: 232: 226: 223: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2336: 2328: 2224: 2198: 2130: 1657: 1295: 1284: 1274: 1273: 1260: 1249:Instructions 1182:2.49.100.119 1179: 1176:Running time 1152: 1146: 1140: 1134: 1130: 1098: 1092: 1086: 1061: 1057: 1046: 1040: 1034: 1000: 978: 958: 944: 941: 937: 727: 705: 665: 627: 591:Project Talk 579: 560: 485: 445: 398: 342: 283:WikiProjects 240: 229: 228: 224: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2309:BlueMoonset 2289:BlueMoonset 2274:BlueMoonset 2269:CodexJustin 2246:CodexJustin 2204:CodexJustin 2193:BlueMoonset 2178:BlueMoonset 2174:CodexJustin 2157:CodexJustin 2150:BlueMoonset 2134:BlueMoonset 2114:BlueMoonset 2095:CodexJustin 2066:BlueMoonset 2044:CodexJustin 2019:CodexJustin 1992:BlueMoonset 1974:CodexJustin 1945:BlueMoonset 1927:CodexJustin 1902:CodexJustin 1892:regardless. 1869:BlueMoonset 1851:CodexJustin 1823:BlueMoonset 1805:CodexJustin 1779:CodexJustin 1752:BlueMoonset 1733:CodexJustin 1706:CodexJustin 1677:CodexJustin 1634:CodexJustin 1619:Filmman3000 1604:Filmman3000 1562:CodexJustin 1556:BlueMoonset 1541:CodexJustin 1531:Filmman3000 1500:BlueMoonset 1492:CodexJustin 1488:Filmman3000 1463:Filmman3000 1443:CodexJustin 1418:Filmman3000 1360:BlueMoonset 1339:BlueMoonset 1331:GA criteria 1327:Filmman3000 1314:CodexJustin 1299:Filmman3000 1278:Filmman3000 1263:transcluded 1114:CodexJustin 1072:CodexJustin 1019:CodexJustin 1003:CodexJustin 659:Film portal 336:Film portal 251:renominated 148:free images 31:not a forum 2354:Categories 2329:References 1625:Jon Peters 1496:WP:SPOILER 1335:verifiable 1216:Authorship 1202:GA toolbox 365:guidelines 353:open tasks 1964:included. 1275:Reviewer: 1239:Templates 1230:Reviewing 1195:GA Review 1067:and here 962:CannedMan 461:Lady Gaga 452:Lady Gaga 424:Lady Gaga 247:please do 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1665:MOS:LEAD 1288:contribs 1244:Criteria 1141:SNUGGUMS 1087:SNUGGUMS 1035:SNUGGUMS 307:American 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2295:Kingsif 2265:Kingsif 2252:Kingsif 2229:Kingsif 2225:Shallow 1062:Vulture 630:on the 522:Arizona 488:on the 273:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1630:WP:GAN 1537:WP:GAN 596:Alerts 518:Cinema 279:scale. 126:Google 2199:Venom 2085:here. 1842:well. 1589:have. 1265:from 1153:edits 1099:edits 1047:edits 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2313:talk 2299:talk 2278:talk 2256:talk 2233:talk 2208:talk 2182:talk 2161:talk 2138:talk 2118:talk 2099:talk 2070:talk 2048:talk 2023:talk 1996:talk 1978:talk 1949:talk 1931:talk 1906:talk 1873:talk 1855:talk 1827:talk 1809:talk 1783:talk 1756:talk 1737:talk 1710:talk 1681:talk 1638:talk 1608:talk 1566:talk 1545:talk 1504:talk 1467:talk 1422:talk 1343:talk 1318:talk 1303:talk 1282:talk 1186:talk 1147:talk 1118:talk 1093:talk 1076:talk 1058:Vice 1041:talk 1023:talk 1007:talk 988:talk 966:talk 480:High 370:Film 355:and 302:Film 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 622:Low 176:TWL 2356:: 2315:) 2301:) 2280:) 2267:, 2258:) 2235:) 2210:) 2184:) 2163:) 2140:) 2120:) 2101:) 2072:) 2050:) 2025:) 1998:) 1980:) 1951:) 1933:) 1908:) 1875:) 1857:) 1829:) 1811:) 1785:) 1758:) 1739:) 1712:) 1683:) 1640:) 1610:) 1568:) 1547:) 1506:) 1469:) 1424:) 1345:) 1320:) 1305:) 1290:) 1188:) 1156:) 1150:/ 1120:) 1102:) 1096:/ 1078:) 1050:) 1044:/ 1025:) 1009:) 990:) 968:) 714:). 674:). 520:/ 516:: 305:: 156:) 54:; 2311:( 2297:( 2291:: 2287:@ 2276:( 2254:( 2248:: 2244:@ 2231:( 2206:( 2195:: 2191:@ 2180:( 2159:( 2152:: 2148:@ 2136:( 2116:( 2097:( 2068:( 2046:( 2021:( 1994:( 1976:( 1947:( 1929:( 1904:( 1871:( 1853:( 1825:( 1807:( 1781:( 1754:( 1735:( 1708:( 1679:( 1636:( 1621:: 1617:@ 1606:( 1564:( 1558:: 1554:@ 1543:( 1533:: 1529:@ 1502:( 1465:( 1446:° 1420:( 1341:( 1316:( 1301:( 1285:· 1280:( 1184:( 1144:( 1116:( 1090:( 1074:( 1038:( 1021:( 1005:( 986:( 964:( 945:B 942:I 938:— 634:. 492:. 403:. 367:. 285:: 253:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
A Star Is Born (2018 film)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
Media and drama good article
good article criteria
the review page
please do
renominated

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.