130:
109:
78:
49:
21:
238:
Deletion had been discussed in the past (and can be justified because is doesn't actually seem to be used and hasn't seen much development in the past 20 years), however, a better solution would be to integrate it into
219:
I don't think this article should be deleted. Web based annotation systems are a growing area of interest and the W3C's work in this area is of notable interest. --
188:
271:
178:
59:
31:
266:
154:
137:
114:
276:
89:
55:
27:
95:
77:
150:
153:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
48:
20:
224:
248:
216:
This seems like an important standard. I vote to keep it. --Dan 18:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
240:
220:
260:
244:
129:
108:
146:
142:
252:
228:
71:
43:
15:
141:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
75:
103:
105:
58:on 22 March 2010 (UTC). The result of
30:on 11 April 2010 (UTC). The result of
163:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
135:This article is within the scope of
94:It is of interest to the following
14:
272:Low-importance Computing articles
128:
107:
76:
47:
19:
213:I'm missing some example code.
183:This article has been rated as
54:This article was nominated for
26:This article was nominated for
267:Start-Class Computing articles
166:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
157:and see a list of open tasks.
253:09:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
293:
229:22:17, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
189:project's importance scale
182:
123:
102:
277:All Computing articles
151:information technology
84:This article is rated
138:WikiProject Computing
88:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
169:Computing articles
90:content assessment
203:
202:
199:
198:
195:
194:
70:
69:
42:
41:
284:
171:
170:
167:
164:
161:
132:
125:
124:
119:
111:
104:
87:
81:
80:
72:
51:
44:
23:
16:
292:
291:
287:
286:
285:
283:
282:
281:
257:
256:
236:
211:
168:
165:
162:
159:
158:
117:
85:
12:
11:
5:
290:
288:
280:
279:
274:
269:
259:
258:
241:Web Annotation
235:
232:
210:
207:
205:
201:
200:
197:
196:
193:
192:
185:Low-importance
181:
175:
174:
172:
155:the discussion
133:
121:
120:
118:Low‑importance
112:
100:
99:
93:
82:
68:
67:
60:the discussion
52:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
289:
278:
275:
273:
270:
268:
265:
264:
262:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
233:
231:
230:
226:
222:
217:
214:
208:
206:
190:
186:
180:
177:
176:
173:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:
134:
131:
127:
126:
122:
116:
113:
110:
106:
101:
97:
91:
83:
79:
74:
73:
65:
61:
57:
53:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
237:
218:
215:
212:
204:
184:
136:
96:WikiProjects
64:no consensus
63:
35:
86:Start-class
261:Categories
234:Deletion?
221:Joshuagay
160:Computing
147:computing
143:computers
115:Computing
245:Chiarcos
209:Untitled
56:deletion
28:deletion
187:on the
149:, and
92:scale.
249:talk
225:talk
62:was
36:keep
34:was
179:Low
263::
251:)
243:.
227:)
145:,
247:(
223:(
191:.
98::
66:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
