2382:
the "early life," section, I saw that the source of her bio material was tagged as needing a better cite, but in fact, the still-retained material was essentially self-published. Then I looked at how long she adhered to 9/11 "truther" beliefs. The attack occurred when she was only 16, but it took her more than 13 additional years to realize that narrative to which she had adhered was bunk. She worked for years for a network that is specifically designed to promote fictional views of geopolitics/"fake news" crafted in the interests of the owner, the
Russian state, that are also bunk. That's quite a delay in the eventual advent of a "moment of clarity." It reflects what appears to be a diminished capacity of, or resistance to, critical thinking. This doesn't mean that she's usually wrong, or a bad person, and I don't think either would be an apt description of her and she is obviously talented. So, in the absence of more persuasive arguments, I'm strongly in favor of keeping that in this article's lede. It's very basic. It seems to be who she is.
1016:
995:
1102:
1084:
1934:
guidelines for
Biographies of living persons "...biographies should be pared back to a version that is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic." "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourcedâwhether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionableâshould be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing."
3445:, says that analyses in newspapers "is rarely reliable for statements of fact." The reasoning is probably that reporters are good sources for what happened today, but are not historians. I think that in cases where sourcing is poor that it is better to omit information. It's a trade off between providing as much information as possible and being as neutral as possible. Articles shouldn't shape readers' opinions about subjects but should reflect how they are widely portrayed.
1265:
921:
1507:
854:
760:
1183:
733:
1903:
conspiracy theory' list compiled by The Daily
Telegraph. The list was ranked by following and traction." The article still makes it sound like Martin was a key figure in this movement, not a random adherent of a popular movement. If we are going to add "Grassy Knoll adherent" to every relevant Knowledge (XXG) biography, lot of work ahead. Also, no idea why 9/11 Conspiracy Theory and 9/11 Truth are separate articles.
770:
304:
473:
357:
911:
190:
890:
1324:
614:
663:
645:
419:
352:
2399:. The lead is a summary of the article, and this makes up a good chunk of it. Naturally it should mention that she has since renounced those views, and if people want to summarise other parts of her career then that's good too. When an intro is this short we don't need to start worrying about weight unless adding other information in the same level of detail would make it too long. (
1173:
1152:
842:
515:
2135:. As well as the inline citations to reliable sources, there must also be in-text attribution. In other words, the new phrase or sentence in the lede should open with words such as "according to". Because it is so important that this information is not given disproportionate prominence, the new phrase or sentence should be as brief and succinct as possible.
1464:
1716:
did not remove such sources and much of this happened before my edits. I am only bringing this article to be reassessed because of genuine concerns regarding edits between the original GA article and what is currently posted. Since I can now see the original sources presented, I may be able to add them back and fix some issues.----
1686:
revert and rollback all your changes and to restore the last good version. However, because I am no longer active here, I will not be participating in any changes moving forward. I just wanted to comment on your poor edits and bad justification for this reassessment and to observe that you should not be allowed to edit this page.
2424:. It is the reason the became notable in the first place, it is still often mentioned when she is discussed in RS, and above all, it is significantly covered in the body of the article and therefore should be summarized in the lead. The lead is not just for current career and current views, it is for summary of the body.
673:
2931:. It should remain in the article. BuzzFeed and the Daily Telegraph certainly fall within the category of tabloid journalism, but are still sourced in the article. For consistency, the quote will be added back. The quote is relevant to Martin's career at RT since it illuminates a pattern of disturbing behavior.
1632:: There is no consensus to delist the article. One editor supports delisting, one editor opposes delisting, and one editor is neutral. There is no consensus that the article does not meet the good article criteria, so this defaults to the article's retaining good article status. Closing per request at
2575:
The reason why many sources need to be cited is because some editors will inevitably claim (a) Martin did not promote 9/11 conspiracy theories, and (b) Martin's promotion of conspiracy theories is UNDUE. Because some editors are incapable of editing this encyclopedia in good faith and in a consistent
2381:
I was wholly unfamiliar with the subject of this article, until solicited today for comment. I presume it was a bot that generated that solicitation. I read many of the comments on this talk page, but felt there was no preponderance of the evidence supporting either position. Going to the article, in
2107:
2) That the information mostly predated Ms Martin's journalistic career. I think this is true, but I was unable to make the connection between this fact and the decision to exclude the information from the lede. Ms Martin espoused and promulgated the view that 9/11 was an inside job for many years,
1933:
People are not "theorists". They maybe have theories or suscribe to theories. I suggest it is an infringement of neutrality to give such prominence to year old views a journalist has since relinquished in a living biography by denigrating them in the lead as a "conspiracy theorist". If we follow the
2991:
Weight argument is stronger than RS argument. Alegemeiner is not a tabloid source and is considered reliable by RSP. However, the
Wilmington analogy is not a good one: Algemeiner is one of the largest US Jewish-focused news outlets, and local interest to Jews is not comporable to local interest to a
2631:
Whenever I see multiple footnotes, my assumption is that editors are using multiple weak sources to compensate for the lack of any good sources. Your comment that it is necessary to show weight doesn't make sense. You need to prove that on the talk page not in the article, otherwise lots of articles
2558:(Jan. 20, 2016 1:15 PM)), which uses the video as its source. The next sentence, which explains what Martin said in the interview, could be sourced to the youtube video. Also, we should mention that these stories were published in response to Martin's criticism of Russia for the invasion of Ukraine.
2518:
AM is currently doing the rounds for her new film - 'Gaza Fights For
Freedom'. This challenges the mainstream narrative that Israel is currently being attacked by an oppressive and violent regime from Palestine. Please bear this in mind with edits, as the more she tours and exposes what Palestine is
2115:
4) That there is a violation of BLP. I was unable to give this point much weight. WP:BLP enjoins editors to remove unsourced or poorly-sourced negative information about living people. There is nothing in BLP or anywhere else in our content policies that requires us to remove negative information
2096:
Discussion closers on
Knowledge (XXG) are expected to look beyond the numbers and weigh the arguments in the light of Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. The matter is intricate, and involves the interaction between quite a number of those policies and guidelines, so I would like to describe
1862:
please let us know what is going on with this reassessment. As of today 17 June 2019, the template at the top of the article says "The good article status of this article is being reassessed by the community to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the
1746:
interested in this reassessment is just an attempt to remove its quality rating. I therefore have zero interest in discussing anything further with you, and itâs this kind of extreme incompetence and blatant POV pushing that has led me to lose all interest in
Knowledge (XXG). Donât ping me again.
2659:
I came here to make the same point as the original poster. Martin making a handful of comments around 14 years ago is definitely overkill to make it such a prominent point here. It's clearly a bad-faith position being used to simply write off her entire career as a "crazy 9/11 conspiracy theorist".
2296:
Given she renounced such views before becoming known I'd say it's undue. She was young and angry about an unjust war. And I don't think being a "9/11 conspiracy theorist" was ever considered a career path. A brief mention in the body is one thing, but including it in the lede is something else. The
2199:
For two reasons: (1) This is something that reliable sources frequently note when they cover her (and it's not as if RS are giving this person a lot of coverage): AP, NY Times, Washington Post, National Post, New
Republic, Buzzfeed News, Newsweek, Huffington Post, Daily Beast and so on. (2) Besides
2103:
1) That the information should be added to the lede because it is reliably-sourced and forms a major part of the article. One editor disputed whether the information was reliably-sourced. I checked this point carefully, and I am confident that this editor is mistaken. The disputed information is
1715:
to accuse me of having information "discarded". This is not the case. Looking at the article when it originally was granted GA status, there were some different sources used, for example RT's discovery of Martin and the information that was not originally only sourced by a college research paper. I
3408:
The text read, "In 2014 New York Times columnist Robert Mackey contrasted Martin's critical remarks on the
Russian occupation of Crimea with her conviction "that the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were part of a government conspiracy." That's clearly analysis rather than reporting. He's comparing what
3392:
Some newspapers, magazines, and other news organizations host online columns they call blogs. These may be acceptable sources if the writers are professionals, but use them with caution because blogs may not be subject to the news organization's normal fact-checking process. If a news organization
3371:
says, "he was a reporter and columnist for the New York Times, where he anchored the newspaperâs breaking news blog, The Lede, for five years, and wrote a news analysis column, Open Source." The article comes under "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces," which are not rs for articles.
2701:
In this section there was a quote from Martin apparently saying that she says RT gave her the greatest editorial freedom , ( can't imagine why ), but the reference was inaccurate, and useless, and how the hell is her saying how great RT is , anything to do with 'Reception'. Why has this article
2093:
This RfC concerns Abby Martin, a US pundit who began her career as a 9/11 truther, but who (much later) disavowed this position. The question posed by the RfC is superficially simple -- whether or not to mention her status as a former 9/11 truther in the lede. Editors do not agree, and purely on
3347:
Mackey in the NYT is not an opinion piece and is completely a reliable source, giving a in-depth background to what's in the news. The Crimea sentence in our article is pretty opaque, and could be clarified or removed; the article could be used more robustly in relation to her 9/11 views, showing
3210:
The
Spotify version of the Martin on the Joe Rogan show is a primary source. The other citations were: Tablet, HuffPost, TSL, NYT and USA Today, which are all, I believe, RSs. Daily Banter I'm not familiar with; that looks like the weakest, but it is attributed and takes up very little room here.
2111:
3) That to include the information in the lede would be UNDUE. This is a reference to one of Knowledge (XXG)'s three core content policies, and in context I understood it as a concern that although the information is reliably-sourced, the reliable sources are not unbiased. Wikipedians sometimes
3163:
policy because you don't know whether the sources are acceptable. The default should be to remove and discuss. The major issue was weight. We don't use niche publications for stories that have been ignored in major mainstream media. While they may be of interest to their readers, they are not of
1685:
that you appear to have discarded. So, not only are both of your claims false, you yourself appear to be responsible for the current state of the article, which makes your attempt at reassessing it both duplicitous and in bad faith. The solution, therefore, is not to reassess the article, but to
1745:
I stand by my comments, more so based on your reply to my concerns. How could you possibly request a GA reassessment without doing the bare due diligence, namely, checking the originally reviewed version? You are clearly biased against Martin based on your previous edits, and your claim to be
1902:
Recent changes seem helpful, but "9/11 conspiracy theorist" is still not Martin's Career - just like JFK/Grassy Knoll or Moon Landing Hoaxer is personal belief, not Career. Abby Martin is not even mentioned on the "9/11" page, but this is: "In 2008, 9/11 conspiracy theories topped a 'greatest
2112:
need to construct impartial articles from biased sources. I gave that concern full weight, and I concur that the disputed information should not be presented in Knowledge (XXG)'s voice. I note a later section of the same policy, at WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV, describes how to deal with biased sources.
1680:
The edit controversies you refer to in the above began with you and another user edit warring and destabilizing the article due to your own POV pushing. Additionally, the content you describe as âfabricated information in the article not supported by sourcesâ is, in fact, real, accurate, and
249:
If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is
1963:
Or we can take this up with the BLP noticeboard. Honestly, you think the description as a conspiracist belongs in the lede, while her board membership does not? What is the distinction, exactly? They are BOTH covered in the article. In any case, the description has to go. From
3328:"Israel is the only country in the world that was paved for a specific group of people that experienced such horrific discrimination and genocide, and for that same group of people to now use Hitler's methods against another minority to maintain a Jewish majority, is insane."
3240:. I looks reasonably respectable, if small, from its Knowledge (XXG) page. It claims to have a staff of 120 yet "operates out of Room 101 in Walker Hall on the northern portion of Pomona College's campus". Quite cramped I imagine. What statement are we using TSL for?
2276:(coming from BLPN). Given the small amount of weight relative to the rest of her career, and that she has stated she has moved beyond that. It still needs to be mentioned in the body, no question, but with the current short lede, its really UNDUE to put it there. --
2006:, Snooganssnoogans. It is still controversial. Unless you can show that it is a "commonly used" description, then it is a clear violation of BLP and should be removed. I will give you time to reply here before I revert your edit. (Also, you might consider reviewing
2621:
source says, "Later its D.C.-based host, Abby Martin, was praised for denouncing Russia's invasion of Ukraine on air and proclaiming her editorial independence from the network (later still, and this is not totally related, it was revealed that she's an avid 9/11
2977:. Unless something receives widespread media attention it's not noteworthy. For example, if Joe Biden orders takeout crab cakes in Wilmington, Delaware, it might make the back pages of the local weekly newspaper but not be significant to his overall biography.
2660:
Unfortunately with articles like this a certain core of others, there's one particular editor who considers themselves the ultimate authority on all things WP so this will just end up as an endless cycle of editing and the same person instantly reverting it
2799:
The DNI report that she's rebutting did not claim that her RT show was active during the 2016 election - it explicitly says the show was created in the run-up to the 2012 election. Her 'rebuttal' suggests that the DNI report said something that it didn't.
2477:: "A 2015 BuzzFeed News article stated that beside being active in the 9/11 truth movement, Martin "frequently showcased other conspiracy theories"." My notation was "the Buzzfeed article is about Martin's show which is covered in the next section."
2242:. Seems amply sourced by RSes, and a significant portion of her career. Possibly we should also mention that in 2014 she stated that she no longer subscribes to these views - however this does not erase her prior work in this area.
2403:: " should not be taken as a reason to exclude information from the lead, but rather to harmonize coverage in the lead with material in the body of the article.") Based on the current article I'd give the topic about two lines. â
2123:
With apologies to Activist, I feel the need to challenge his arithmetic. In fact 9/11 took place five days after Ms Martin's 18th birthday. I think it's material that she was an adult when she formed and promulgated her truther
3111:
a large amount of text - some critical, some complimentary - removed for being from blogs or otherwise badly sourced. I'm not clear which sources are seen as problematic. Can we discuss case by case rather than delete en block?
1879:
3459:
But this is in the "Reception" section. The NYT is by far the most mainstream source currently cited, so if we are looking for how they are widely portrayed it seems more pertinent than Millenial Magazine or ColdType?
867:
743:
3315:: I think I flagged this as a primary source, presumably reliable for her views (though I did not verify it) but not in itself evidence of noteworthiness. It has since been deleted, to which I have no objection.
3267:
with her conviction "that the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were part of a government conspiracy." I would rewrite this to make it clearer that that it is Mackey's opinion that the two connected and contradictory.
2628:
In fact all these articles are about her criticism of the invasion and her trutherism. While I am not implying a connection between the two, the fact is they were reported at the same time in the same articles.
153:
3509:
3243:
There is a question mark over using HuffPuff for politics. Not sure whether our usage here fits into that category. The article does not appear to be from a "contributor" or "editorial partner". Any thoughts?
2489:
This information repeats what is already in the article. "9/11 conspiracy theories" already says that Martin, "was part of the 9/11 Truth movement, starting her own 9/11 Truther group...." The next section,
2835:
You didn't just remove that, you first removed the paragraph addressing neoMcCarthyism and non-corporate journalism. Moreover, those quotes refer to subjects highlighted in the podcast introductory text:
2024:
There are several RS that have covered her involvement in the 9/11 conspiracy theories movement, with one entire subsection devoted to it in the body, in addition to one third of the 'reception' section.
3270:
I know nothing about the Daily Banter. It doesn't even seem to have a Knowledge (XXG) page!! It has been used 59 times on Knowledge (XXG) but, as far as I can see, its reliability has not been discussed.
3253:
1. Our statement "Martin has been criticized for her past support of the 9/11 truth movement" is sourced to this blog and The Daily Banter. Probably should be removed unless there are other appropriate
2119:
5) That the Manual of Style encourages adding the information to the lede. The MOS is a guideline, and therefore carries additional weight, although it cannot overrule the core content policy cited by
538:
3182:
To be clearer, it seemed to me the sources were reliable, so the material did not appear to violate BLP policy. Which of the sources do you consider too niche for the material to have due weight?
2364:
For the violation of BLP explained by me earlier. Plus the editor trying to include this appears to have an agenda of including only negative info, so it might also be a violation of neutrality.
2777:
it's not a random quote but a direct response to the accusations that you added. Normally denial of accusations by subjects is added and not that denials are always primary sources of opinion.
2899:
The material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism. When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared in more reliable sources.
2497:
Basically, the text adds nothing to the article and is confusing. It implies Martin had a show when she was in the Truth movement. It's not clear why Buzzfeed should be mentioned in text.
3164:
interest to the general public. It is not the role of articles to correct the failure of reliable sources to amplify information that Knowledge (XXG) editors consider to be important.
3539:
872:
2592:
And no, we absolutely do not need to insinuate to readers that RS are 'going after her' for daring to criticize Russia's invasion of Crime or whatever it is that you're suggesting.
2486:
The source used says, "Martin, an antiwar activist and artist, has also been involved in the 9/11 truth movement, and her show has frequently showcased other conspiracy theories."
593:
284:
456:
1772:
I will not ping you, but I admit that this is my first time requesting a GA reassessment. It was only done purely because I noticed multiple issues (mainly missing sources and
1809:
I made some edits to the article. There is still a tag asking for a better source, and I agree the source is not great. The statement does not seem very controversial though.
1560:
404:
3544:
3614:
2542:. This is overkill since all the sources refer back to an original source, a 2008 inteview of Martin included in a youtube video posted by the truther group WeAreChangeLA (
3196:
Are you referring to these sources: a Spotify episode, Tablet Magazine, HuffPuff, The Student Life, a blog from Robert Mackey at the NYTimes, The Daily Banter, and Issuu?
3534:
2901:
Algemeiner is tabloid journalism and has a well-known ideological bent when it comes to Israel. Even so, I don't see how the quote is relevant to Martin's career at RT.
1066:
1968:: "Do not use controversial or effusive descriptions unless commonly used by reliable sources." This description is controversial. It is not "commonly used". It goes.
1445:
147:
3211:
Issuu is actually a magazine called ColdType, and I have no idea of the reliability but as it's a banal compliment it's hard to see how it violates the BLP policy.
598:
289:
3574:
1056:
2073:
But this is a BLP, so the BLP noticeboard is far more appropriate. Other than Snoogy, nobody seems to think fringe theories are relevant here in the first place.
1243:
977:
832:
551:
3233:
Are we accepting the Joe Rogan reference? There are all sorts of quotes from the Joe Rogan show that I would like to start adding to Knowledge (XXG) if allowed.
2259:
It actually doesn't seem to be a part of her career at all. Most of it happened before she was a professional journalist. And as a journalist, she disavowed it.
423:
2301:, is excessive and is written in a way which presents the subject of the article in a negative light. I think trimming it would be a good thing for this BLP.--
79:
2838:
the journalist discusses Hillary Clintonâs 'neoMcCarthyism'" and "on her experiences as an independent journalist in a culture that silences dissenting voices
3594:
3589:
3494:
3604:
3584:
3559:
3529:
1233:
967:
822:
581:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
272:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1032:
2097:
my analysis of the debate in quite a lot of detail. I apologise for giving a closing statement that's nearly as long as the debate that gave rise to it!
1342:
691:
573:
315:
264:
3423:
As I said above, how the text currently reads is opaque and unhelpful; we should clarify or delete. But I don't see why we shouldn't include analysis.
2116:
that's immediately followed by a string of inline citations to reliable sources that directly support what we say. BLP is not a whitewasher's charter.
3609:
3569:
3564:
3549:
3250:
says "if a news organization publishes an opinion piece in a blog, attribute the statement to the writer", which we have almost but not quite done.
3079:
1205:
943:
798:
85:
3519:
3342:
Martin herself is a 9/11 Truther, calling the government's version of the events "propaganda", and has accused Israel of using "Hitler's methods".
3340:
HuffPo: Was used as another source for the Nazi analogy, currently only used as citation for her 2008 involvement in 9/11 truth. (Relevant quote:
2200:
her criticism of the annexation of Crimea, her involvement in the 9/11 Truther movement is covered at greatest length in the body of the article.
1776:) and thought that there may be more fundamental issues with the article. Just replying to your response and thanks for sharing your concerns.----
2635:
I suggest you take time to think this out, because I don't think these changes would harm any meaning, but would merely make the reading clearer.
1209:
695:
440:
3504:
1023:
1000:
333:
3599:
3554:
3524:
2412:
3514:
1949:
People who push conspiracy theories are conspiracy theorists. If you disagree, you can start a RfC or consult with the Fringe noticeboard.
1602:
207:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
30:
690:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
3579:
44:
3499:
1196:
1157:
1118:
934:
895:
783:
738:
483:
2429:
699:
686:
650:
321:
99:
1598:
2623:
2576:
principled manner, it's sadly the case that it's often necessary to cite a million sources to fend off these bad faith challenges.
2481:
reverted with the notation: "restore rs content. i'm fine with this being here. but it can also be moved to a section on her show."
104:
20:
1270:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
3311:
2946:
2149:
2138:
If anyone has any questions or objections to raise, please bring this to my talk page in the first instance. I hope this helps.â
74:
1583:
489:
2929:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_302#Algemeiner_Journal_&_The_Jewish_News_Syndicate
2877:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_302#Algemeiner_Journal_&_The_Jewish_News_Syndicate
2736:
1428:
625:
243:
214:
200:
2837:
3351:
Daily Banter: Probably not reliable and incident it mentions probably not noteworthy as no other coverage. Support removal.
3007:
3001:
2626:
2539:
1109:
1089:
65:
2166:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2464:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2425:
2104:
reliably-sourced, and I concur that, if it meets Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies and guidelines, it should be included.
859:
168:
3442:
239:
1575:
135:
3335:
2744:. It clearly states that the subject should be quoted in her own defense when attacks on her are posted in the article.
2127:
After weighing the arguments against the policies and guidelines in this way, I conclude that the disputed information
521:
1544:
1332:
1882:. Would you or someone else be able to help with the technical work of closing a good article reassessment? Thanks,
3004:
2805:
2764:
2702:
got a green mark saying its good. It looks rubbish. And why was the Liz Wahl quote removed from this section which
2615:
2597:
2581:
2551:
2226:
2205:
2181:
2049:
2030:
1987:
1954:
1923:
1515:
1015:
994:
582:
273:
204:
109:
3465:
3450:
3428:
3414:
3399:
3377:
3356:
3216:
3187:
3169:
3117:
3013:
2997:
2982:
2883:
2819:
2782:
2642:
2565:
2504:
2408:
2992:
Delaware town. At any rate, it looks like other sources mentioned this and/or cited Algemeiner, showing weight.
2928:
2876:
2814:
It is not up to editors to analyze responses by subjects and determine if they are plausible. That violates OR.
1524:
231:
2441:, well sourced, significant and as noted above probably the reason she is anything other than totally ignored.
2326:
1346:
631:
129:
2723:
Indeed! This 'article' could have been written by her, it's so full of special pleading and tendentiousness.
2519:
having to endure, the more pro-Israeli / AIPAC lobbyists are going to be on here smearing her with impunity
2369:
1939:
1908:
2934:
2711:
2306:
1101:
1083:
3344:
It is from HP UK, which I believe is considered more reliable than its US sibling. I'd support inclusion.
3320:
She believes that, in order to maintain a Jewish majority, Israel persecutes Palestinians similar to how
3030:
Those sources are much better, imo. I paraphrased it and added it to a new section about Martin's views,
2865:
On RT in February 2013, she commented that Israel uses "Hitler's methods" to sustain a "Jewish majority".
1712:
242:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
235:
55:
3393:
publishes an opinion piece in a blog, attribute the statement to the writer, e.g. "Jane Smith wrote ..."
2801:
2760:
2593:
2577:
2478:
2222:
2201:
2177:
2045:
2026:
2010:. Why does this particular description of someone she used to be but has disavowed belong in the lede?)
1983:
1950:
1919:
1904:
1117:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1031:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1028:
942:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
797:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
433:
303:
125:
3387:
3247:
70:
2625:
The Huffpost article is about how Martin criticized the invasion, before mentioning she was a truther.
2108:
she was vocal about it in public places, and she sought leadership roles in the 9/11 truther movement.
472:
356:
3461:
3446:
3424:
3410:
3395:
3373:
3352:
3264:
3212:
3183:
3165:
3113:
3009:
2993:
2978:
2964:
The DT is a 'tabloid'? Oh, dear. I suppose the definition of 'tabloid' is anything you disagree with.
2942:
2938:
2879:
2845:
2815:
2778:
2749:
2638:
2561:
2500:
2404:
2264:
2145:
2078:
1623:
592:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
385:
283:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
3438:
3274:
3197:
1476:
514:
325:
3295:
3278:
3201:
2665:
2524:
2322:
2064:
2015:
1973:
1751:
1691:
1490:
418:
351:
175:
161:
2974:
2614:
source says that Martin has been in the news for criticizing the invasion has roots in Trutherism.
2298:
221:
3307:
3259:
2868:
2387:
2365:
1935:
1883:
1850:
1783:
1723:
1668:
1638:
1529:
1439:
1403:
1362:
596:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
287:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
2894:
2872:
1826:
A lot has been reverted or removed. I tried. I feel the lead is too short, but YMMV. All in all
1633:
589:
280:
2043:
3148:
3051:
2914:
2707:
2318:
It is NOT robustly sourced. I did a google search for "9/11 Truther movement abby martin" ...
2302:
2247:
1868:
1839:
1818:
1188:
926:
775:
51:
2007:
1887:
1642:
1526:
1506:
678:
3160:
2741:
2003:
1965:
2841:
2745:
2284:
2260:
2139:
2074:
1419:
1378:
1201:
546:
533:
3080:"Shocking: Russia Today Presenter Abby Martin Accuses Israel of Using 'Hitler's Methods'"
1773:
141:
2686:
Whenever someone says "It's clearly", one knows that they are selling a dogma, not fact.
3331:
3130:
2661:
2520:
2060:
2011:
1969:
1747:
1706:
1687:
2715:
3488:
2449:
2383:
2347:
2341:
1804:
1777:
1717:
1662:
2339:
Dude, did you check the article and its references? New York Times, Atlantic, WaPo?
1182:
3321:
3303:
3136:
3039:
2902:
2759:
Randomly plucked comments out of primary sources do not belong on Knowledge (XXG).
2243:
1864:
1857:
1831:
1810:
1483:. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
189:
759:
732:
2494:
says her show "investigated conspiracy theories related to water fluoridation."
3409:
she is saying now with what she said over a decade ago in order to analyze her.
3326:
This has now been deleted, although I don't understand why. Her actual quote is
3031:
2491:
2474:
2400:
1568:
1480:
1304:
1286:
1204:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
451:
217:
account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)
24:
2221:
prior to GPRamirez5's reliably sourced white-washing of content from the body.
1200:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about
662:
644:
220:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
3299:
2543:
2277:
1387:
1323:
1178:
939:
916:
910:
889:
849:
793:
788:
765:
668:
460:
2320:
not a single one of the sources that included such info is solid news agency.
3263:
columnist Robert Mackey contrasted Martin's critical remarks on the Russian
524:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
477:
427:
2555:
3034:. Because the quote is more about her views than about her stint at RT's
2443:
1918:
She was a 9/11 conspiracy theorist and RS have covered it. So should we.
1863:
reassessment page. Date: 09:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)" That links here.
841:
2176:
Should the lede describe her involvement in the 9/11 Truther movement?
1528:
203:
procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the
2002:
You still have not argued why this description is not in violation of
1172:
1151:
3291:
1653:
There have been recent edit controversies surrounding this article.
3469:
3454:
3432:
3418:
3403:
3381:
3360:
3298:
state; that its goal is, and has always been, to kill or expel the
3282:
3220:
3205:
3191:
3173:
3152:
3121:
3055:
3017:
2986:
2950:
2918:
2887:
2849:
2823:
2809:
2786:
2768:
2753:
2669:
2646:
2601:
2585:
2569:
2528:
2508:
2454:
2433:
2416:
2391:
2373:
2352:
2330:
2310:
2288:
2268:
2251:
2230:
2209:
2185:
2153:
2082:
2068:
2053:
2034:
2019:
1991:
1977:
1958:
1943:
1927:
1912:
1891:
1872:
1842:
1821:
1789:
1755:
1729:
1695:
1674:
1646:
698:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1114:
2875:. However, the only discussion on RSP considers it to be RS: see
2094:
the numbers, the debate superficially appears to be inconclusive.
1429:"Useful Idiots: Abby Martin on New Doc 'Gaza Fights for Freedom'"
2706:
pertinent to how her work was being received, its 'Reception'.
1681:
verifiable and supported by the original sources found in the
1659:
fabricated information in the article not supported by sources
1530:
1500:
1458:
1318:
1259:
607:
588:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
565:
509:
279:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
256:
184:
15:
2538:
The first sentence of this section has 8 references which is
3510:
Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are good articles
1878:
I closed the reassessment as "no consensus to delist" after
1661:. I think this warrants a review of the article overall.----
840:
3386:
This from The Lede not Open Source. Surely it's covered by
3159:
You shouldn't restore material removed because it violates
1427:
Matt Taibbi, Katie Helper, Abby Martin (October 25, 2019).
476:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2544:
9-11 Truth March 10-11-08 Santa Monica Part 3 FIREFIGHTERS
2042:
I started a discussion on the Fringe theories noticeboard.
1982:
One is reliably sourced, the other is entirely unsourced.
230:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
3000:) 12:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Other sources: The Tablet,
2740:
quotes, and the above "Reception" thread, please respect
787:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
3108:
2860:
2482:
2219:
1682:
1658:
1654:
1618:
1610:
1579:
1485:
1471:
1300:
1282:
397:
378:
2552:"Russia Today Host Has Roots in â9/11 Truthâ Movement"
2059:
That's a good idea. Let's see what someone else says.
160:
3318:
TSL: This was one of three sources for the statement
3330:
This has been reported by a number of sources, e.g.
3310:
state. According to her, for non-Jews, Israel is an
1113:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1027:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
938:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
3246:The NYTimes reference is to Robert Mackey's blog.
1308:
1290:
3337:so I would strongly argue that it it noteworthy.
1377:timestamp mismatch; January 20, 2014 suggested (
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1208:. To improve this article, please refer to the
3540:Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
331:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
3615:Knowledge (XXG) pages referenced by the press
1538:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
2492:Abby Martin#Breaking the Set and work for RT
1444:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
1489:; for the discussion at that location, see
3545:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
1146:
1078:
989:
884:
727:
639:
345:
298:
1333:mentioned by multiple media organizations
1041:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women writers
3535:GA-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
3306:, so that Jewish colonizers can have an
457:Russian military intervention in Ukraine
3070:
2871:is not a reliable source for BLPs, per
1548:when more than 10 sections are present.
1148:
1080:
991:
886:
729:
641:
3391:
3341:
3327:
3319:
3289:
2927:Algemeiner is a legitimate source per
2898:
2864:
2546:.) I suggest we trim this back to the
1437:
1415:
1411:
1401:
1374:
1370:
1360:
1218:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television
952:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Journalism
807:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
3575:Mid-importance Women writers articles
2100:The arguments raised were as follows:
708:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
7:
3135:can you please explain the POV-tag?
2475:Abby Martin#9/11 conspiracy theories
2162:The following discussion is closed.
1655:There is information without sources
1194:This article is within the scope of
1107:This article is within the scope of
1021:This article is within the scope of
932:This article is within the scope of
781:This article is within the scope of
684:This article is within the scope of
613:
611:
196:Warning: active arbitration remedies
3595:All WikiProject Women-related pages
3590:GA-Class WikiProject Women articles
3495:Biography articles of living people
2855:Is Algemeiner an unreliable source?
630:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
3605:Low-importance television articles
3585:WikiProject Women writers articles
3560:Low-importance Journalism articles
3530:Low-importance California articles
2473:I removed the following text from
1044:Template:WikiProject Women writers
14:
2540:Knowledge (XXG):Citation overkill
1880:a request for closure at WP:ANRFC
1542:may be automatically archived by
1127:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women
868:San Francisco Bay Area task force
449:Did you know ... that journalist
324:. If you can improve it further,
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
3443:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources
3078:Pontz, Zach (February 3, 2013).
2696:
2460:The discussion above is closed.
1505:
1462:
1388:"Abby Martin vs Knowledge (XXG)"
1386:Abby Martin (January 14, 2014).
1341:Abby Martin (January 14, 2014).
1322:
1263:
1181:
1171:
1150:
1100:
1082:
1014:
993:
919:
909:
888:
852:
768:
758:
731:
671:
661:
643:
612:
571:This article must adhere to the
513:
471:
417:
355:
350:
302:
262:This article must adhere to the
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
3610:WikiProject Television articles
3570:GA-Class Women writers articles
3565:WikiProject Journalism articles
3550:WikiProject California articles
1619:Watch article reassessment page
1238:This article has been rated as
1221:Template:WikiProject Television
1061:This article has been rated as
972:This article has been rated as
955:Template:WikiProject Journalism
827:This article has been rated as
810:Template:WikiProject California
520:This article was nominated for
3520:WikiProject Biography articles
2218:Here's the body of the article
2133:not in Knowledge (XXG)'s voice
711:Template:WikiProject Biography
426:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
312:has been listed as one of the
1:
3505:Media and drama good articles
3500:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
3161:biographies of living persons
1830:on its good article listing.
1711:Thank you for your reply and
1696:22:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
1675:09:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
1121:and see a list of open tasks.
1035:and see a list of open tasks.
946:and see a list of open tasks.
865:This article is supported by
860:San Francisco Bay Area portal
801:and see a list of open tasks.
574:biographies of living persons
316:Media and drama good articles
265:biographies of living persons
244:contentious topics procedures
42:Put new text under old text.
3600:GA-Class television articles
3555:GA-Class Journalism articles
3525:GA-Class California articles
3236:I don't know anything about
3153:03:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
3122:18:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
3056:14:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
3018:12:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
2987:05:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
2951:02:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
2919:18:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
2888:17:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
2850:17:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
2824:17:32, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
2810:17:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
2787:16:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
2769:16:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
2754:14:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
2716:12:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2670:04:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
2647:04:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2602:03:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2586:03:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2570:03:17, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2529:22:38, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
2509:19:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
2455:18:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
2434:08:27, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
2297:body as it is now smacks of
2154:19:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
696:contribute to the discussion
213:You must be logged-in to an
3515:GA-Class biography articles
3470:17:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
3455:09:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
3433:07:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
3419:01:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
3404:01:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
3382:23:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
3361:23:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
3283:17:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
3221:09:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
3206:03:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
3192:02:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
3174:22:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
2417:13:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
2392:03:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
1657:. I have also been finding
586:must be removed immediately
547:RT (TV network)#Programming
447:The text of the entry was:
277:must be removed immediately
3631:
3580:WikiProject Women articles
2867:. Its premise is that the
2374:22:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
2353:00:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
1843:09:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
1822:10:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
1244:project's importance scale
1133:WikiProject Women articles
1130:Template:WikiProject Women
1067:project's importance scale
978:project's importance scale
833:project's importance scale
534:RT (TV network)#Presenters
232:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
2863:, removing this content:
2331:20:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
2311:21:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
2289:15:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
2269:13:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
2252:10:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
2231:15:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
2210:10:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
2186:10:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
2083:23:58, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
2069:23:03, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
2054:22:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
2035:22:03, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
2020:21:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
1992:21:37, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
1978:21:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
1959:21:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
1944:21:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
1928:19:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1913:06:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
1892:23:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
1873:22:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
1790:00:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
1756:21:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
1730:15:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
1647:09:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
1555:Good article reassessment
1536:
1503:
1237:
1166:
1095:
1060:
1024:WikiProject Women writers
1009:
971:
904:
848:
826:
753:
656:
638:
496:
470:
414:
405:Good article reassessment
348:
344:
246:before editing this page.
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
3348:they extended past 2008.
2893:That is how I interpret
2632:would become unreadable.
2534:9/11 Conspiracy theories
2462:Please do not modify it.
2426:AmbivalentUnequivocality
2164:Please do not modify it.
2129:may be added to the lede
1301:Abby Martin (journalist)
550:, December 13 2012, see
240:normal editorial process
3103:More sourcing questions
2514:Gaza Fights For Freedom
537:, December 2 2013, see
2730:Responses and podcasts
1545:Lowercase sigmabot III
1331:This article has been
1299:, 12 March 2014, from
1197:WikiProject Television
1047:Women writers articles
935:WikiProject Journalism
845:
784:WikiProject California
744:San Francisco Bay Area
620:This article is rated
424:fact from this article
236:standards of behaviour
75:avoid personal attacks
3290:Martin believes that
1713:using your good faith
1469:The contents of the
1281:, 4 March 2014, from
1212:for the type of work.
844:
687:WikiProject Biography
624:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
322:good article criteria
222:limited circumstances
205:ArabâIsraeli conflict
100:Neutral point of view
3265:occupation of Crimea
1345:. RT. Archived from
386:Good article nominee
105:No original research
3441:, which is part of
3257:2. We say "In 2014
2697:'Reception' section
1683:GA reviewed version
1349:on January 14, 2014
1224:television articles
1206:join the discussion
1202:television programs
958:Journalism articles
813:California articles
3439:News organizations
2973:It is a matter of
2869:Algemeiner Journal
2734:Pertaining to the
2165:
1624:Most recent review
1343:"Breaking the Set"
846:
714:biography articles
626:content assessment
361:Article milestones
215:extended confirmed
201:contentious topics
197:
86:dispute resolution
47:
3308:ethno-supremacist
3032:Abby Martin#Views
3003:The Student Life,
2937:comment added by
2453:
2351:
2172:RfC: 9/11 Truther
2163:
2152:
1552:
1551:
1497:
1496:
1457:
1456:
1431:. Rolling Stone.
1317:
1316:
1283:Draft:Abby Martin
1258:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1189:Television portal
1145:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1110:WikiProject Women
1077:
1076:
1073:
1072:
988:
987:
984:
983:
927:Journalism portal
883:
882:
879:
878:
776:California portal
726:
725:
722:
721:
606:
605:
564:
563:
560:
559:
508:
507:
504:
503:
490:September 6, 2017
398:February 16, 2019
340:
297:
296:
255:
254:
195:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
3622:
3367:Mackey's bio at
3324:persecuted Jews.
3302:population, the
3238:The Student Life
3145:
3142:
3139:
3134:
3095:
3094:
3092:
3090:
3075:
3048:
3045:
3042:
3036:Breaking the Set
2953:
2911:
2908:
2905:
2802:Snooganssnoogans
2761:Snooganssnoogans
2594:Snooganssnoogans
2578:Snooganssnoogans
2479:Snooganssnoogans
2447:
2345:
2281:
2223:Snooganssnoogans
2202:Snooganssnoogans
2178:Snooganssnoogans
2144:
2046:Snooganssnoogans
2027:Snooganssnoogans
1984:Snooganssnoogans
1951:Snooganssnoogans
1920:Snooganssnoogans
1861:
1854:
1808:
1786:
1726:
1710:
1671:
1637:
1621:
1615:
1606:
1587:
1547:
1531:
1509:
1501:
1488:
1466:
1465:
1459:
1449:
1443:
1435:
1423:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1407:
1399:
1397:
1395:
1382:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1366:
1358:
1356:
1354:
1326:
1319:
1267:
1266:
1260:
1226:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1216:
1210:style guidelines
1191:
1186:
1185:
1175:
1168:
1167:
1162:
1154:
1147:
1135:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1104:
1097:
1096:
1086:
1079:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1039:
1018:
1011:
1010:
1005:
997:
990:
960:
959:
956:
953:
950:
929:
924:
923:
922:
913:
906:
905:
900:
892:
885:
862:
857:
856:
855:
815:
814:
811:
808:
805:
778:
773:
772:
771:
762:
755:
754:
749:
746:
735:
728:
716:
715:
712:
709:
706:
692:join the project
681:
679:Biography portal
676:
675:
674:
665:
658:
657:
647:
640:
623:
617:
616:
615:
608:
594:this noticeboard
566:
526:
525:
517:
510:
497:Current status:
475:
421:
400:
381:
360:
359:
354:
346:
329:
306:
299:
285:this noticeboard
257:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
3630:
3629:
3625:
3624:
3623:
3621:
3620:
3619:
3485:
3484:
3462:BobFromBrockley
3425:BobFromBrockley
3396:BobFromBrockley
3353:BobFromBrockley
3312:apartheid state
3296:setter-colonial
3213:BobFromBrockley
3184:BobFromBrockley
3143:
3140:
3137:
3128:
3114:BobFromBrockley
3105:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3088:
3086:
3077:
3076:
3072:
3046:
3043:
3040:
3010:BobFromBrockley
2994:BobFromBrockley
2932:
2909:
2906:
2903:
2897:. Specifically
2880:BobFromBrockley
2857:
2732:
2699:
2536:
2516:
2471:
2466:
2465:
2405:ReconditeRodent
2279:
2193:
2174:
2168:
2159:
2158:
2157:
1900:
1855:
1848:
1802:
1784:
1724:
1704:
1669:
1628:
1617:
1596:
1573:
1567:
1564:
1557:
1543:
1532:
1527:
1484:
1463:
1453:
1452:
1436:
1426:
1410:
1400:
1393:
1391:
1385:
1369:
1359:
1352:
1350:
1340:
1336:
1264:
1223:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1213:
1187:
1180:
1160:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1003:
957:
954:
951:
948:
947:
925:
920:
918:
898:
858:
853:
851:
812:
809:
806:
803:
802:
774:
769:
767:
747:
741:
713:
710:
707:
704:
703:
677:
672:
670:
621:
466:
465:
445:
396:
377:
349:
234:, any expected
227:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
3628:
3626:
3618:
3617:
3612:
3607:
3602:
3597:
3592:
3587:
3582:
3577:
3572:
3567:
3562:
3557:
3552:
3547:
3542:
3537:
3532:
3527:
3522:
3517:
3512:
3507:
3502:
3497:
3487:
3486:
3483:
3482:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3364:
3363:
3349:
3345:
3338:
3332:Jerusalem Post
3316:
3272:
3271:
3268:
3260:New York Times
3255:
3251:
3244:
3241:
3234:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3224:
3223:
3177:
3176:
3156:
3155:
3104:
3101:
3097:
3096:
3084:The Algemeiner
3069:
3068:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3020:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2922:
2921:
2856:
2853:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2772:
2771:
2731:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2698:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2636:
2633:
2629:
2605:
2604:
2589:
2588:
2535:
2532:
2515:
2512:
2470:
2467:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2436:
2419:
2394:
2376:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2334:
2333:
2323:Peter K Burian
2313:
2291:
2271:
2254:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2213:
2212:
2192:
2189:
2173:
2170:
2169:
2160:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1931:
1930:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1846:
1845:
1824:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1737:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1699:
1698:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1626:
1563:
1558:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1549:
1537:
1534:
1533:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1519:
1511:
1495:
1494:
1472:Abigail Martin
1467:
1455:
1454:
1451:
1450:
1424:
1412:|archive-date=
1383:
1371:|archive-date=
1337:
1330:
1329:
1327:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1294:
1268:
1256:
1255:
1252:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1240:Low-importance
1236:
1230:
1229:
1227:
1193:
1192:
1176:
1164:
1163:
1161:Lowâimportance
1155:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1136:
1119:the discussion
1105:
1093:
1092:
1087:
1075:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1063:Mid-importance
1059:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1033:the discussion
1019:
1007:
1006:
1004:Midâimportance
998:
986:
985:
982:
981:
974:Low-importance
970:
964:
963:
961:
944:the discussion
931:
930:
914:
902:
901:
899:Lowâimportance
893:
881:
880:
877:
876:
873:Low-importance
864:
863:
847:
837:
836:
829:Low-importance
825:
819:
818:
816:
799:the discussion
780:
779:
763:
751:
750:
748:Lowâimportance
736:
724:
723:
720:
719:
717:
683:
682:
666:
654:
653:
648:
636:
635:
629:
618:
604:
603:
599:this help page
583:poorly sourced
569:
562:
561:
558:
557:
556:
555:
542:
518:
506:
505:
502:
501:
494:
493:
484:On this day...
468:
467:
455:condemned the
446:
416:
415:
412:
411:
408:
401:
393:
392:
389:
382:
379:April 12, 2015
374:
373:
370:
367:
363:
362:
342:
341:
307:
295:
294:
290:this help page
274:poorly sourced
260:
253:
252:
226:
225:
218:
210:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3627:
3616:
3613:
3611:
3608:
3606:
3603:
3601:
3598:
3596:
3593:
3591:
3588:
3586:
3583:
3581:
3578:
3576:
3573:
3571:
3568:
3566:
3563:
3561:
3558:
3556:
3553:
3551:
3548:
3546:
3543:
3541:
3538:
3536:
3533:
3531:
3528:
3526:
3523:
3521:
3518:
3516:
3513:
3511:
3508:
3506:
3503:
3501:
3498:
3496:
3493:
3492:
3490:
3471:
3467:
3463:
3458:
3457:
3456:
3452:
3448:
3444:
3440:
3436:
3435:
3434:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3421:
3420:
3416:
3412:
3407:
3406:
3405:
3401:
3397:
3394:
3389:
3385:
3384:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3370:
3369:The Intercept
3366:
3365:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3343:
3339:
3336:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3323:
3317:
3314:
3313:
3309:
3305:
3301:
3297:
3293:
3288:Rogan (Text:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3269:
3266:
3262:
3261:
3256:
3252:
3249:
3245:
3242:
3239:
3235:
3232:
3231:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3209:
3208:
3207:
3203:
3199:
3195:
3194:
3193:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3178:
3175:
3171:
3167:
3162:
3158:
3157:
3154:
3150:
3146:
3132:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3110:
3102:
3085:
3081:
3074:
3071:
3067:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3037:
3033:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3026:
3025:
3024:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3008:
3005:
3002:
2999:
2995:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2984:
2980:
2976:
2972:
2971:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2952:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2936:
2930:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2900:
2896:
2892:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2885:
2881:
2878:
2874:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2854:
2852:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2807:
2803:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2793:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2738:
2737:Rolling Stone
2729:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2637:
2634:
2630:
2627:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2613:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2590:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2557:
2556:Robert Mackey
2553:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2533:
2531:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2513:
2511:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2495:
2493:
2487:
2484:
2483:
2480:
2476:
2468:
2463:
2456:
2451:
2446:
2445:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2420:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2395:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2380:
2377:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2366:Mystichumwipe
2363:
2360:
2359:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2343:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2321:
2317:
2314:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2295:
2292:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2275:
2272:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2238:
2237:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2198:
2195:
2194:
2190:
2188:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2171:
2167:
2156:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2142:
2136:
2134:
2130:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2098:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2044:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2001:
2000:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1936:Mystichumwipe
1929:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1905:PLawrence99cx
1897:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1859:
1852:
1844:
1841:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1829:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1806:
1801:
1800:
1791:
1787:
1781:
1780:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1731:
1727:
1721:
1720:
1714:
1708:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1666:
1665:
1660:
1656:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1625:
1620:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1554:
1546:
1541:
1535:
1522:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1512:
1510:
1508:
1502:
1499:
1492:
1491:its talk page
1487:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1473:
1468:
1461:
1460:
1447:
1441:
1434:
1430:
1425:
1421:
1416:|archive-url=
1405:
1389:
1384:
1380:
1375:|archive-url=
1364:
1348:
1344:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1328:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:Discussions:
1269:
1262:
1261:
1245:
1241:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1190:
1184:
1179:
1177:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1137:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1068:
1064:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1051:
1038:Women writers
1034:
1030:
1029:women writers
1026:
1025:
1020:
1017:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1002:
1001:Women writers
999:
996:
992:
979:
975:
969:
966:
965:
962:
945:
941:
937:
936:
928:
917:
915:
912:
908:
907:
903:
897:
894:
891:
887:
874:
871:(assessed as
870:
869:
861:
850:
843:
839:
838:
834:
830:
824:
821:
820:
817:
800:
796:
795:
790:
786:
785:
777:
766:
764:
761:
757:
756:
752:
745:
740:
737:
734:
730:
718:
701:
700:documentation
697:
693:
689:
688:
680:
669:
667:
664:
660:
659:
655:
652:
649:
646:
642:
637:
633:
627:
619:
610:
609:
601:
600:
595:
591:
587:
584:
580:
576:
575:
570:
568:
567:
553:
549:
548:
543:
540:
536:
535:
530:
529:
528:
527:
523:
519:
516:
512:
511:
500:
495:
491:
487:
485:
479:
474:
469:
464:
462:
458:
454:
453:
443:
442:
437:
435:
434:Did you know?
429:
425:
420:
413:
409:
407:
406:
402:
399:
395:
394:
390:
388:
387:
383:
380:
376:
375:
371:
368:
365:
364:
358:
353:
347:
343:
338:
336:
335:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
311:
308:
305:
301:
300:
292:
291:
286:
282:
278:
275:
271:
267:
266:
261:
259:
258:
251:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
228:
223:
219:
216:
212:
211:
208:
206:
202:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3368:
3322:Nazi Germany
3304:Palestinians
3273:
3258:
3237:
3106:
3087:. Retrieved
3083:
3073:
3065:
3035:
2933:â Preceding
2858:
2834:
2735:
2733:
2708:Bulldog Antz
2703:
2700:
2618:
2611:
2560:
2547:
2537:
2517:
2499:
2496:
2488:
2485:
2472:
2461:
2442:
2438:
2421:
2396:
2378:
2361:
2340:
2319:
2315:
2303:C.J. Griffin
2293:
2273:
2256:
2239:
2196:
2175:
2161:
2140:
2137:
2132:
2128:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2099:
2095:
2041:
1932:
1901:
1847:
1834:
1833:
1827:
1813:
1812:
1778:
1736:
1718:
1663:
1652:
1629:
1611:
1607:
1593:Article talk
1592:
1591:
1588:
1569:
1539:
1513:
1504:
1498:
1470:
1432:
1392:. Retrieved
1390:. RT America
1351:. Retrieved
1347:the original
1296:
1278:
1272:
1271:
1239:
1195:
1108:
1062:
1022:
973:
933:
866:
828:
792:
782:
685:
632:WikiProjects
597:
585:
578:
572:
545:redirect to
544:
532:redirect to
531:
499:Good article
498:
481:
450:
448:
441:June 1, 2015
439:
431:
403:
384:
332:
330:
326:please do so
314:
313:
309:
288:
276:
269:
263:
248:
229:
209:
198:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
3388:WP:NEWSBLOG
3248:wp:newsblog
2622:truther!)."
2401:MOS:LEADREL
1580:visual edit
1561:Abby Martin
1486:its history
1481:Abby Martin
1394:January 14,
1353:January 14,
1305:Abby Martin
1287:Abby Martin
452:Abby Martin
310:Abby Martin
148:free images
31:not a forum
25:Abby Martin
3489:Categories
3300:indigenous
3066:References
2939:Workwammba
2842:GPRamirez5
2746:GPRamirez5
2550:blog post
2261:GPRamirez5
2141:SÂ Marshall
2075:GPRamirez5
1514:Archives:
1475:page were
1309:discussion
1291:discussion
1215:Television
1158:Television
949:Journalism
940:journalism
896:Journalism
804:California
794:California
789:U.S. state
739:California
552:discussion
539:discussion
488:column on
461:RT America
438:column on
320:under the
3275:Burrobert
3198:Burrobert
3131:Apeholder
2861:this edit
2662:Apeholder
2521:Apeholder
2299:WP:CHERRY
2061:Eaglizard
2012:Eaglizard
1970:Eaglizard
1748:Viriditas
1707:Viriditas
1688:Viriditas
1440:cite news
1414:requires
1404:cite news
1363:cite news
705:Biography
651:Biography
590:libellous
478:Main Page
428:Main Page
281:libellous
238:, or any
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
3437:Because
3254:sources.
3127:Agreed.
3109:restored
3089:July 28,
2947:contribs
2935:unsigned
2895:WP:BLPRS
2873:WP:BLPRS
2619:ATlantic
2469:Buzzfeed
2413:contribs
2384:Activist
2379:Support.
2197:Support.
1805:ZiaLater
1779:ZiaLater
1719:ZiaLater
1664:ZiaLater
1634:WP:ANRFC
622:GA-class
522:deletion
463:network?
334:reassess
250:covered.
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
3107:I have
3006:HuffPo.
2439:Support
2422:Support
2397:Support
2362:Oppose.
2316:Oppose.
2294:Oppose.
2244:Icewhiz
2240:Support
2008:WP:LEDE
1865:MPS1992
1858:Aircorn
1828:Neutral
1603:history
1584:history
1570:Article
1540:30 days
1433:@ 28:15
1242:on the
1065:on the
976:on the
831:on the
480:in the
459:on the
430:in the
369:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
3292:Israel
2975:weight
2742:WP:BLP
2274:Oppose
2257:Oppose
2191:Survey
2124:views.
2120:Masem.
2004:WP:BLP
1966:WP:BLP
1884:Cunard
1851:Cunard
1840:(talk)
1819:(talk)
1639:Cunard
1630:Result
1477:merged
1307:, see
1289:, see
628:scale.
391:Listed
372:Result
126:Google
3294:is a
2450:help!
2348:Help!
1774:WP:OR
1612:Watch
1479:into
1297:Moved
1124:Women
1115:women
1090:Women
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
3466:talk
3451:talk
3429:talk
3415:talk
3400:talk
3378:talk
3357:talk
3279:talk
3217:talk
3202:talk
3188:talk
3170:talk
3149:talk
3118:talk
3091:2019
3052:talk
3014:talk
2998:talk
2983:talk
2943:talk
2915:talk
2884:talk
2846:talk
2820:talk
2806:talk
2783:talk
2765:talk
2750:talk
2712:talk
2666:talk
2643:talk
2617:The
2610:The
2598:talk
2582:talk
2566:talk
2525:talk
2505:talk
2430:talk
2409:talk
2388:talk
2370:talk
2327:talk
2307:talk
2280:asem
2265:talk
2248:talk
2227:talk
2206:talk
2182:talk
2131:but
2079:talk
2065:talk
2050:talk
2031:talk
2016:talk
1988:talk
1974:talk
1955:talk
1940:talk
1924:talk
1909:talk
1898:9/11
1888:talk
1869:talk
1835:corn
1814:corn
1785:talk
1752:talk
1725:talk
1692:talk
1670:talk
1643:talk
1599:edit
1576:edit
1446:link
1420:help
1396:2014
1379:help
1355:2014
1279:Moot
694:and
410:Kept
366:Date
199:The
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
3447:TFD
3411:TFD
3374:TFD
3166:TFD
3141:The
3044:The
2979:TFD
2907:The
2859:Re
2816:TFD
2779:TFD
2704:was
2639:TFD
2612:NYT
2562:TFD
2554:by
2548:NYT
2501:TFD
2444:Guy
2342:Guy
1832:AIR
1811:AIR
1303:to
1285:to
1234:Low
1057:Mid
968:Low
823:Low
791:of
579:BLP
270:BLP
176:TWL
3491::
3468:)
3453:)
3431:)
3417:)
3402:)
3390:,
3380:)
3359:)
3281:)
3219:)
3204:)
3190:)
3172:)
3151:)
3144:IP
3138:Im
3120:)
3082:.
3054:)
3047:IP
3041:Im
3038:.
3016:)
2985:)
2949:)
2945:â˘
2917:)
2910:IP
2904:Im
2886:)
2848:)
2840:"
2822:)
2808:)
2785:)
2767:)
2752:)
2714:)
2668:)
2645:)
2600:)
2584:)
2568:)
2527:)
2507:)
2432:)
2415:Âť
2411:¡
2407:ÂŤ
2390:)
2372:)
2329:)
2309:)
2287:)
2267:)
2250:)
2229:)
2208:)
2184:)
2081:)
2067:)
2052:)
2033:)
2018:)
1990:)
1976:)
1957:)
1942:)
1926:)
1911:)
1890:)
1871:)
1788:)
1754:)
1728:)
1694:)
1673:)
1645:)
1622:â˘
1616:â˘
1601:|
1582:|
1578:|
1442:}}
1438:{{
1408::
1406:}}
1402:{{
1373:/
1367::
1365:}}
1361:{{
875:).
742::
422:A
337:it
328:.
156:)
54:;
3464:(
3449:(
3427:(
3413:(
3398:(
3376:(
3355:(
3334:,
3277:(
3215:(
3200:(
3186:(
3168:(
3147:(
3133::
3129:@
3116:(
3093:.
3050:(
3012:(
2996:(
2981:(
2941:(
2913:(
2882:(
2844:(
2836:"
2818:(
2804:(
2781:(
2763:(
2748:(
2710:(
2664:(
2641:(
2596:(
2580:(
2564:(
2523:(
2503:(
2452:)
2448:(
2428:(
2386:(
2368:(
2350:)
2346:(
2325:(
2305:(
2285:t
2283:(
2278:M
2263:(
2246:(
2225:(
2204:(
2180:(
2150:C
2148:/
2146:T
2077:(
2063:(
2048:(
2029:(
2014:(
1986:(
1972:(
1953:(
1938:(
1922:(
1907:(
1886:(
1867:(
1860::
1856:@
1853::
1849:@
1807::
1803:@
1782:(
1750:(
1722:(
1709::
1705:@
1690:(
1667:(
1641:(
1636:.
1608:¡
1605:)
1597:(
1589:¡
1586:)
1574:(
1516:1
1493:.
1448:)
1422:)
1418:(
1398:.
1381:)
1357:.
1335::
1311:.
1293:.
1246:.
1069:.
980:.
835:.
702:.
634::
602:.
577:(
554:.
541:.
492:.
486:"
482:"
444:.
436:"
432:"
339:.
293:.
268:(
224:)
172:¡
166:¡
158:¡
151:¡
145:¡
139:¡
133:¡
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
