84:
74:
53:
22:
363:
One important structure theorem of abelian varieties is
Matsusaka's theorem. It states that over an algebraically closed field every abelian variety is the quotient of the Jacobian of some curve; that is, there is some surjection of abelian varieties where is a Jacobian. This theorem remains true
199:
You would make a better impression if you adopted a more constructive tone, and also read the third sentence of the lead section. There is no need to put the most general sentence in the second sentence of an introduction. The 'algebraic definition' section down the page goes to the general field
167:
for the abelian variety over the
Dedekind domain (meaning that the generic point of the model is the original abelian variety over the number field). This model, being an abelian scheme over the Dedekind domain, can be reduced to an abelian variety over any residue field of the Dedekind domain.
262:, which I believe people follow through the 'related changes', somewhat clunky. I believe as a good citizen I should be adding to this the new pages, and also unlinked pages that I come across. Well, I have done some of that, but the page is very big at well over 100K.
194:
This article is crap. For instance abelian varieties need not be over C, so they need not be complex tori, and I can certainly count Q-bar. Can someone more knowledgable with wikipedia put up the sign "In desperate need of expert review"?--unsigned
162:
The third paragraph of the introduction says: "This induces a map from the fraction field to any such finite field." There is no such map (there are no homomorphisms between fields of different characteristic). Instead, one constructs a so-called
265:
Also, as in the case of 'Abelian variety' which was on the LOMT already and for which I made a page, it seems that the
Related Changes doesn't flag that as a new page on its creation. This seems odd, in the case of a 'wanted' page.
222:, if you want a ridiculously steep learning curve. There they will find a definition as complete variety with group law - on p.39. Chapter One is all about the complex manifold instance. Rest my case.
239:
I have expanded and re-organized this article. It is still far from perfect so feel free to improve on it. It is my first (serious) contbutto wikipedia so comments and critique are most welcome. --
140:
322:
372:
Unless it is attempting to say that the theorem remains true if the algebraically closed condition is removed and the condition that the ground field is infinite is added.
277:
I'm sort of a novice, but in the section on the algebraic defintion, isn't it true that all abelian varieties are projective (ie. over any field, not just complex)
369:
Since the initial statement of the theorem says nothing about the cardinality of the ground field, it is entirely unclear why the last sentence was necessary.
396:
130:
324:(Fontaine, Il n’y a pas de vari´et´e ab´elienne sur Z, Invent. Math. 81 (1985), no. 3, 515–538.) and use this as motivation for semi-stable reduction.
106:
391:
175:
339:
97:
58:
287:
That is correct, and is also what was intended in the article. I have changed the wording slightly, hoping to avoid confusion. --
200:
case; but the complex manifold case is important enough. Articles here do not strive initially for the greatest generality.
33:
259:
211:
Your remark still doesn't make the sentence true. Nah well, I'll just refer people to the literature.--unsigned
179:
258:
I'm fairly new round here - I have created a number of new pages to fill gaps in mathematics. I'm finding the
335:
278:
255:
223:
201:
39:
83:
327:
171:
21:
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
305:
89:
269:
This is a confusing piece. You could define words so that it is clear what is the same as what.
73:
52:
331:
385:
288:
247:
Fantastic work. I'll try to find time later on to do my grammar-nazi thing. -
240:
102:
248:
79:
302:
This page should discuss the fact that there are no abelian schemes over
343:
291:
281:
226:
204:
183:
15:
308:
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
379:instead of forcing readers to guess what is meant.
316:
8:
325:
169:
47:
310:
309:
307:
218:Well, you could refer them to Mumford's
158:Map from fraction field to residue field
49:
19:
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
397:Mid-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
377:it needs to be stated explicitly
364:if the ground field is infinite.
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
135:This article has been rated as
184:07:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
344:08:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
392:B-Class mathematics articles
317:{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
260:list of mathematical topics
190:Comment on article validity
413:
292:10:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
227:12:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
205:19:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
375:But if this is the case,
243:13:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
282:14:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
251:21:20, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
318:
28:This article is rated
319:
256:User:Charles Matthews
306:
121:mathematics articles
356:Important theorems
314:
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
350:Unclear paragraph
346:
330:comment added by
220:Abelian Varieties
186:
174:comment added by
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
404:
323:
321:
320:
315:
313:
224:Charles Matthews
202:Charles Matthews
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
412:
411:
407:
406:
405:
403:
402:
401:
382:
381:
358:is as follows:
352:
304:
303:
300:
298:Abelian Schemes
279:CraigDesjardins
275:
237:
192:
176:217.123.117.211
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
410:
408:
400:
399:
394:
384:
383:
351:
348:
312:
299:
296:
295:
294:
274:
271:
253:
252:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
213:
212:
208:
207:
191:
188:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
409:
398:
395:
393:
390:
389:
387:
380:
378:
373:
370:
367:
365:
359:
357:
349:
347:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
297:
293:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
272:
270:
267:
263:
261:
257:
250:
246:
245:
244:
242:
234:
228:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
209:
206:
203:
198:
197:
196:
189:
187:
185:
181:
177:
173:
166:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
376:
374:
371:
368:
362:
360:
355:
354:The section
353:
332:Username6330
326:— Preceding
301:
276:
268:
264:
254:
238:
219:
193:
170:— Preceding
164:
161:
137:Mid-priority
136:
96:
62:Mid‑priority
40:WikiProjects
165:NĂ©ron model
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
386:Categories
235:expansion
340:contribs
328:unsigned
273:Question
172:unsigned
139:on the
30:B-class
289:Lenthe
241:Lenthe
36:scale.
249:Gauge
336:talk
180:talk
366:"
131:Mid
388::
342:)
338:•
182:)
361:"
334:(
311:Z
178:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.