823:"When writing an article about a piece of legislation, whether it has passed into law or not, title the article with the short name of the legislation, and not with a title in the form "Bill #". Per WP:NC-GAL, the short form name (XYZ Act) is preferred whenever possible, with the long form name (An Act to XYZ) in place as a redirect to it. (The long form name is permissible as the primary title if a short form name cannot be properly sourced, although this should virtually never be anything more than a temporary measure.) Bill numbers, however, are routinely repeated in different contexts—different legislative bodies, different sessions of the same legislative body, etc.—and thus a bill number is almost never an unambiguous or unique name. When a piece of legislation is commonly referred to by its bill number, a redirect or disambiguation page should be created, like at Bill C-51."
854:
changes made to it. The previous version did not have as much information and also veered into ideological territory by taking opinionated stances on how this law is supposed to affect certain kinds of religious groups and what the public reaction to the law is (for example, it makes it seem as though the law is very controversial, when polls show the law is supported by a large majority of Quebec's population and other province's populations, so that does not make sense). Furthermore, how people feel toward a law and the hypothetical effects it could have are not as important as describing what the law actually is, does and how it came into being. Those last three points are what should be presented in the lead text, not the first two (which should have dedicated sections in the article).
84:
179:
158:
189:
1263:
422:
373:
74:
53:
22:
263:
944:"Opponents have argued that the law will feed intolerance toward Muslims, Sikhs and other groups who wear religious clothing (such as headscarves and turbans) in accordance with their practice, whereas other critics argue that it does not go far enough and should be extended to daycares. Several legal cases have been filed against the law since its passage."
1196:
434:
901:
Supporters argue that the law supports the state's separation of church and state principle, that the state and its agents must be seen as independent of religious institutions. Opponents have argued that the law will feed intolerance toward
Muslims, Sikhs and other groups who wear religious clothing
1160:
You're right that "Bill" means a draft law ("projet de loi"). However, there is no usage in
Canadian English that changes that to "Law", using the bill number, once the bill is passed. It is given a chapter number in the annual statute volume, and also a chapter number in the full Consolidation of
946:
Here a lot of attention is given to people who are against and people who think it does not go far enough, but those opinions appear to be minorities in the population of Quebec, why then is there no mention of people who support the law? It makes the law seem more controversial than it is by giving
869:
Appreciate your additions to this article, but just translating the French lead isn't enough as it completely ignores the political discussions that are taking place in
English Canada. This is the English language Knowledge (XXG), and the law is controversial in English Canada, so of course it would
759:
I think the guidance in COMMONNAME that "Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources" applies here. The subject of the article is the legislation, not the bill that led to
956:
I think it is totally fine to talk about the challengers, and I can put that as a final pargraph, but I think it should be expressed briefly and that most people support the law first of all. If you think it is still relevant to talk about how some journalists in
English Canada are angry, by virtue
726:
I was also surprised to see that this is the official name of the law in
English, it sounds like a bad translation to me (as a fluently bilingual person), laicity is not the right word. However I agree with the above post suggesting not to use the number of the bill as they can be reused and after
905:
Notably, in a judgment rendered on April 20, 2021, the
Superior Court of Quebec upheld much of the law, but struck down it's application in English-language school boards or to the National Assembly. Following this, the Government of Quebec appealed the judgment to the Quebec Court of Appeals. On
923:
Anyways, here is my argument. Most people in Quebec and other provinces support this act, so it is hard to describe it as controversial... Some
English-language journalists have expressed that they don't like the law. I think its ok to talk about it in the article, but those journalists are from
319:
I add the tag unbalanced under the reactions section. Except political party the section only displays organizations who oppose and there arguments. For a balanced point of view and meet encyclopedic standards. Both arguments must be display as well as poll from the moment. This article is quite
1092:
IÂ noticed several bias in the choice of word. The article must be as neutral as possible. The use of the expression "bill 21" is only valid until the bill is adopted and becomes a law. Once adopted the references to the word "bill" is an act of political protests which do not meet encyclopedic
989:
The lede currently contains this: "The law prohibits civil service employees in positions of coercive authority from wearing religious symbols...." But in fact, the law does not use the phrase "positions of coercive authority" and also, it applies to some people who are not civil servants (e.g.
853:
Hello, I have translated the French-language version of the lead text because it was requested by the template at the top of the page. I believe the French-language lead also does make a better one then what was there before as it is very neutral and only talks about the law and challenges and
656:
Don't name this article "Bill 21" or a variation of that theme, because Bill numbers are re-used over and over again. The name of the Act, while not commonly used, is its official title and should be the name of this article, notwithstanding the language difference in this particular case. An
897:
The law prohibits civil service employees in positions of coercive authority from wearing religious symbols, with a grandfather clause for employees remaining in the same position, and also introduces a requirement to having one's face uncovered when providing or receiving certain government
1123:
Please provide a citation that the statute is now referenced as Law 21. The use of Bill 21 is because it was the 21st bill introduced in that session of the
National Assembly, and it was referred that way, as Bill 21, even in the final version of law once enacted by the Assembly; see:
1131:
It is now included in the annual consolidation of the Quebec statutes issued by the Éditeur officiel du Québec for 2019. The annual consolidation lists it as "2019, c. 12", with the cross-reference to the bill number, Bill 21. The annual consolidation does not refer to it as "Law 21":
941:
makes it seem as though Quebec is dictatorial and violently and perhaps wrongly modified the law, instead of the reality where that the act was assessed through a legal and just process. Quebec follows due process, its not North Korea. It also doesn't clearly explain what happened; both
990:
Schedule II, paragraphs 7 and 8). It's debatable whether teachers and lawyers acting on civil matters have "coercive" authority. Better wording might be, "The law prohibits certain provincial civil servants and people acting on behalf of the province from wearing religious symbols...."
385:
913:
I thank you for talking with me, some people on
Knowledge (XXG) have reverted some of my edits without responding to what I had written on the talk page or just because they felt like it :( ... I reverted before because I saw another user support my changes but that you reverted
760:
it, and the
English title of the legislation is the best title for the article. My second choice would be a descriptive title, such as was formerly used, though how to characterize the law raises neutrality concerns. I do agree that Bill 21 should be bolded in the lead.--
924:
outside Quebec and this is a Quebec law, so I don't see them as being relevant enough to put in the intro. I don't think people would talk about how angry some Michigan journalists are that Minnesota passed a certain law in said law's introductory paragraph, right?
685:
There's not one person in a thousand who thinks of Bill 101 by any other name, regardless of what the government chose to title it. The same with this one. Bill 21 is the least controversial name you're like to find in English and the most likely to last.
874:
cycle - that after making a bold edit, which has been reverted, we keep the original text and discuss in talk rather than trying to ram through the change. Could you perhaps suggest a way of including the political discussions in the lead? Thanks.
741:"Bill 21" is definitely the common name— just peek at the external links and citations, several of which have "Bill 21" right in the title. If it's too vague to be the article title (and it probably is), it should at least be bolded in the lede.
790:. "Bill 21" is ambiguous because Quebec has had dozens of bills numbered "Bill 21", all on various unrelated topics. There's typically a new one in each legislative session. Plus, it's an enactment now, not a bill. There is some guidance at
902:(such as headscarves and turbans) in accordance with their practice, whereas other critics argue that it does not go far enough and should be extended to daycares. Several legal cases have been filed against the law since its passage.
893:
An Act respecting the laicity of the State () tabled and commonly known as Bill 21, is a law passed by the National Assembly of Quebec in 2019 which asserts the policy of state secularism ( laïcité) in the Canadian province of
633:
requesting input here. My instinct is that the original article name was not in English, and this is the English language Knowledge (XXG). However, I believe that notice board is more likely to garner an informed answer for
1275:
630:
553:. The bill is more commonly referred to as "Bill 21" and "Quebec's ban on religious symbols" are more commonly used in the sources used for this article. Due to that, I think the original title should be restored.
1206:
906:
November 9, 2021, the appeals court ruled that English-language school boards must apply the provisions, in particular the recruitment of teachers wishing to wear religious symbols until further notice.
828:
It is no longer a bill, it is an act, so referring to it as a bill is incorrect. I would therefore oppose moving the article, and continue to use the official English name of the Act as the name of the
1058:
It do not oppose article 18. It more a matter of interpretation on how far freedom of belief or religion goes. Those who oppose will telle that any restrictions to freedom of religion is unacceptable.
935:"Notably, in a judgment rendered on April 20, 2021, the Superior Court of Quebec upheld much of the law, but struck down it's application in English-language school boards or to the National Assembly."
519:
article would likely form part of the background section of this article (It is prior legislation on the topic) and neither article seems long enough to make splitting justified. I am aware of the
327:
1157:
Clicking on that link takes us to the official version of the Act in Consolidated Statutes and Regulations of Quebec. Searching for "21" does not bring up any references to "Bill 21" or "Law 21".
1020:
Yes, good point Serjeant Buzfuz. The term "public servants" would be more accurate than "provincial civil servants". I will have a go at revising the lede for accuracy, clarity, and conciseness.
1240:
should be summarized briefly in this article. That topic has its own article and is useful to be mentioned only briefly, perhaps in a section on "Background" or maybe "Similar legislation".
1201:
933:
I appreciate what you have suggested as an intro, I think some of it works, but to me the way some phrases are written show bias or are not very clear. I will show you some examples. 1.
1005:
Teachers are not provincial civil servants, though, so that wording doesn’t include them. Teachers are employed by school boards, which are not part of the provincial government.
817:
1072:
Anyway since we want do reach an encyclopedic view. The important thing to do is to describe properly each position and the argumentation. While not taking a position.
1283:
1179:, for examples of this usage, where even after being passed, a law continues to be referred to by the bill number. This is standard usage, not a political comment.
1096:
Also notice that the talk zone is not the place do debate the merits of the law. Please Remain factual and don't use the talk zone to express your personal opinion.
1319:
130:
727:
becoming law it is no longer about the bill anyways. Cannot really see a great solution to this so maybe keeping the official English name makes sense.
657:
alternative solution would be to created a redirect entitled "Quebec's ban on religious symbols" (or something like that) that points to this article.
140:
974:
Struck down is the common idiom in English for a court finding a law unconstitutional. I don’t see it in any way as a comment on Quebec’s government.
446:
397:
1061:
The issue with that position is that the criminal code already forbids many historical practice like the human sacrifice or stonning the unbelievers.
1314:
279:
241:
1066:
Those who agree argue that a limitation in the expression is reasonable since it limited in the space and times. Around 8 hours while at work.
1324:
1037:
1043:
On article 18, it is stated one has the freedom to manifest his religion or belief in public or private. How does it compare with this law?
1334:
1073:
356:
231:
106:
1143:
1135:
1125:
331:
1339:
1106:
523:
article, but it is long enough to justify splitting, though it should still be mentioned in the Background section of this article.
1197:
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (minimum sentence for offences involving trafficking of persons under the age of eighteen years)
289:
508:
97:
58:
33:
742:
705:
631:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Loi sur la laïcité de l'État→Act respecting the laicity of the State
499:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1329:
682:
Laicity is such an obscure word that The Free Dictionary found it only in Collins. Secularism is a far better translation.
540:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1213:
1184:
1166:
1010:
979:
834:
713:
202:
163:
691:
512:
787:
1153:
It is now also included in the full consolidation of Quebec statutes, produced by Légis Québec, as chapter L-0.3:
310:
1154:
1193:
And some other articles where a bill continues to be referred to as "Bill #", even after passage by Parliament:
1237:
1077:
779:
520:
515:
bacause while they are different pieces of legislation, both deal with the same subject. The material from the
352:
39:
1209:
1180:
1162:
1006:
975:
830:
709:
206:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1110:
1102:
957:
of this being the English wikipedia, I can try to include this in the lead and you tell me if you like it?
550:
344:
323:
687:
561:
1299:
1251:
1247:
1217:
1188:
1170:
1114:
1081:
1052:
1029:
1014:
999:
983:
966:
883:
863:
838:
803:
769:
754:
736:
732:
717:
695:
673:
643:
620:
590:
568:
531:
487:
458:
409:
389:
360:
335:
314:
306:
105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
282:
on September 3, 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
1176:
1126:
http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=5&file=2019C12A.PDF
1025:
995:
799:
476:
275:
21:
549:
I noticed the article was recently moved. I don't find the new title to be an improvement based on
438:
348:
1069:
So in conclusion it more a question of a cultural clash between two interpretations of article 18.
1295:
1266:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
454:
425:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
405:
376:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1093:
standards. Since the law is adopted by the National Assembly, it must be referred as "law 21".
958:
942:
English-language school boards and the Government of Quebec brought this to the higher court. 2.
855:
791:
1048:
765:
639:
616:
586:
556:
525:
481:
1242:
750:
728:
871:
1021:
991:
962:
859:
795:
1308:
1291:
1279:
783:
664:
450:
401:
89:
1044:
761:
635:
612:
582:
576:
178:
157:
1262:
746:
603:
421:
372:
188:
1155:
https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/chapters?corpus=statutes&selection=L
778:
as the article title, not "how it's commonly described". Calling this article
608:
Not sure why I was pinged, but I think this is in regards to your Move action
194:
184:
79:
73:
52:
303:
Will be adding further details detail found im the introduction of the bill
659:
341:
I will be adding more reactions to create a more balanced perspective
102:
1207:
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (offences relating to conveyances)
704:
Nonetheless, the Knowledge (XXG) article is not "Bill 101", but
257:
207:
15:
870:
be encyclopedic to mention it. I'd ask that we respect the
1202:
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (trafficking in persons)
818:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Canada-related articles
816:
There is specific guidance on this particular issue at
609:
284:
270:
416:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
367:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1257:Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technology
475:The articles have been merged after 2 months of
8:
1088:Requirements to meet encyclopaedic standards
288:; for the discussion at that location, see
1144:An Act respecting the laicity of the State
1100:
342:
321:
152:
47:
447:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
398:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
445:Above undated message substituted from
396:Above undated message substituted from
328:2607:FA48:6D9F:E3E0:4CBA:F0A9:9C28:BCB7
280:Act respecting the laicity of the State
154:
49:
19:
1320:Low-importance Canada-related articles
1148:Bill : 21   Assented to : 16-06-2019
1038:Universal Declaration of Human Rights
7:
745:bolds "Bill 101", for comparison. —
495:The following discussion is closed.
200:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
210:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
1271:
1267:
774:We are supposed to use the common
430:
426:
381:
377:
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Canada
14:
708:, the official title of the law.
1274:. Further details are available
1261:
1140:PLÂ : 21 Â Â Sanction: 16-06-2019
536:The discussion above is closed.
433:. Further details are available
420:
384:. Further details are available
371:
261:
187:
177:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
1315:C-Class Canada-related articles
509:Quebec ban on religious symbols
236:This article has been rated as
216:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
135:This article has been rated as
849:Translation of the French lead
788:Drummer for the Rolling Stones
743:Charter of the French Language
706:Charter of the French Language
1:
1290:— Assignment last updated by
1252:10:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
1218:15:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
1189:15:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
1171:13:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
1115:03:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
804:00:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
770:00:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
755:18:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
737:17:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
696:17:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
674:16:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
644:13:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
621:13:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
591:13:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
488:21:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1325:All WikiProject Canada pages
1300:18:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
1136:Loi sur la laïcité de l’État
1030:06:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
1015:14:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
1000:06:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
984:17:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
967:17:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
947:undue weight to challengers.
884:05:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
864:00:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
459:16:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
410:16:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
361:18:26, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
1335:Low-importance law articles
1236:I think the content on the
1175:Please see the WP article,
839:20:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
718:22:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
517:Quebec ban on face covering
513:Quebec ban on face covering
336:02:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
271:Quebec ban on face covering
118:Template:WikiProject Canada
1356:
1099:Alain 23:23 04 Sept 2022
1082:01:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1053:14:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
242:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
545:Regarding the recent move
532:03:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
315:05:12, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
235:
172:
134:
67:
46:
1340:WikiProject Law articles
1238:Quebec Charter of Values
1232:Quebec Charter of Values
629:I have left a notice at
569:11:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
538:Please do not modify it.
521:Quebec Charter of Values
497:Please do not modify it.
219:Template:WikiProject Law
780:Quebec's secularism law
121:Canada-related articles
890:My suggestion is this:
28:This article is rated
1278:. Student editor(s):
782:would be like moving
388:. Student editor(s):
268:The contents of the
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1330:C-Class law articles
1177:Euthanasia in Canada
792:WP:NCGAL#Legislation
507:I propose to merge
437:. Peer reviewers:
1276:on the course page
1210:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz
1181:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz
1163:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz
1007:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz
976:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz
831:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz
710:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz
498:
435:on the course page
386:on the course page
98:WikiProject Canada
34:content assessment
1117:
1105:comment added by
688:G. Timothy Walton
669:
496:
363:
347:comment added by
338:
326:comment added by
296:
295:
256:
255:
252:
251:
248:
247:
151:
150:
147:
146:
1347:
1302:
1284:article contribs
1273:
1269:
1268:8 September 2023
1265:
882:
670:
667:
662:
607:
581:pinging a admin
580:
564:
559:
528:
484:
461:
432:
428:
427:9 September 2019
424:
412:
390:RaphaelPlamondon
383:
379:
375:
307:RaphaelPlamondon
287:
265:
264:
258:
224:
223:
220:
217:
214:
197:
192:
191:
181:
174:
173:
168:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1355:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1305:
1304:
1289:
1272:8 December 2023
1259:
1250:
1234:
1090:
1041:
876:
851:
665:
660:
601:
574:
562:
557:
547:
542:
541:
526:
501:
492:
491:
490:
482:
472:
467:
465:Merger proposal
444:
431:2 December 2019
418:
395:
378:11 January 2019
369:
301:
283:
262:
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:
203:WikiProject Law
193:
186:
166:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1353:
1351:
1343:
1342:
1337:
1332:
1327:
1322:
1317:
1307:
1306:
1258:
1255:
1246:
1233:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1204:
1199:
1158:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1146:
1141:
1138:
1129:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1074:24.202.113.225
1070:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1003:
1002:
972:
971:
970:
969:
951:
950:
949:
948:
928:
927:
926:
925:
918:
917:
916:
915:
908:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
886:
850:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
826:
825:
824:
809:
808:
807:
806:
757:
739:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
699:
698:
683:
677:
676:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
624:
623:
594:
593:
546:
543:
535:
504:
502:
493:
474:
473:
470:
469:
468:
466:
463:
439:Littlebear2019
417:
414:
368:
365:
349:Littlebear2019
300:
297:
294:
293:
266:
254:
253:
250:
249:
246:
245:
238:Low-importance
234:
228:
227:
225:
199:
198:
182:
170:
169:
167:Low‑importance
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1352:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1328:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1310:
1303:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1287:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1264:
1256:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1239:
1231:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1097:
1094:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
987:
986:
985:
981:
977:
968:
964:
960:
955:
954:
953:
952:
945:
940:
936:
932:
931:
930:
929:
922:
921:
920:
919:
912:
911:
910:
909:
904:
900:
896:
892:
889:
888:
885:
881:
880:
873:
868:
867:
866:
865:
861:
857:
848:
840:
836:
832:
827:
822:
821:
819:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
784:Charlie Watts
781:
777:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
758:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
738:
734:
730:
725:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
702:
701:
700:
697:
693:
689:
684:
681:
680:
679:
678:
675:
672:
671:
663:
655:
654:
645:
641:
637:
632:
628:
627:
626:
625:
622:
618:
614:
611:
605:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
592:
588:
584:
578:
573:
572:
571:
570:
567:
566:
565:
560:
552:
551:WP:COMMONNAME
544:
539:
534:
533:
530:
529:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
500:
489:
486:
485:
478:
464:
462:
460:
456:
452:
448:
442:
440:
436:
423:
415:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
393:
391:
387:
382:13 April 2019
374:
366:
364:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:incomplete.
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
298:
291:
290:its talk page
286:
281:
277:
273:
272:
267:
260:
259:
243:
239:
233:
230:
229:
226:
209:
205:
204:
196:
190:
185:
183:
180:
176:
175:
171:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
90:Canada portal
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1288:
1260:
1241:
1235:
1101:— Preceding
1098:
1095:
1091:
1042:
1036:Relation to
1004:
973:
943:
938:
937:The wording
934:
878:
877:
852:
775:
658:
555:
554:
548:
537:
524:
516:
506:
503:
494:
480:
443:
419:
394:
370:
343:— Preceding
340:
322:— Preceding
318:
305:
302:
269:
237:
222:law articles
201:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1107:70.81.55.61
939:struck down
729:Dan Carkner
285:its history
208:legal field
1309:Categories
1161:Statutes.
1022:Mathew5000
992:Mathew5000
796:Mathew5000
274:page were
195:Law portal
898:services.
879:WildComet
1292:Mlaeynaz
1280:Mlaeynaz
1103:unsigned
829:article.
636:— Maile
613:— Maile
558:Username
527:Username
483:Username
451:PrimeBOT
402:PrimeBOT
357:contribs
345:unsigned
324:unsigned
299:Untitled
1045:Notbrev
914:anyways
894:Quebec.
762:Trystan
583:Notbrev
577:Maile66
477:silence
240:on the
139:on the
30:C-class
872:WP:BRD
747:Kawnhr
604:Safyrr
471:MERGED
276:merged
112:Canada
103:Canada
59:Canada
36:scale.
959:7288P
856:7288P
668:(alk)
610:here.
511:with
278:into
1296:talk
1270:and
1248:talk
1214:talk
1185:talk
1167:talk
1111:talk
1078:talk
1049:talk
1026:talk
1011:talk
996:talk
980:talk
963:talk
860:talk
835:talk
800:talk
776:name
766:talk
751:talk
733:talk
714:talk
692:talk
640:talk
634:you.
617:talk
587:talk
563:6892
455:talk
429:and
406:talk
380:and
353:talk
332:talk
311:talk
1286:).
794:.
786:to
449:by
400:by
232:Low
213:Law
164:Law
131:Low
1311::
1298:)
1243:VR
1216:)
1187:)
1169:)
1113:)
1080:)
1051:)
1028:)
1013:)
998:)
982:)
965:)
862:)
837:)
820::
802:)
768:)
753:)
735:)
716:)
694:)
661:PK
642:)
619:)
589:)
479:.
457:)
441:.
408:)
392:.
359:)
355:•
334:)
313:)
1294:(
1282:(
1212:(
1183:(
1165:(
1128:.
1109:(
1076:(
1047:(
1024:(
1009:(
994:(
978:(
961:(
875:—
858:(
833:(
798:(
764:(
749:(
731:(
712:(
690:(
666:T
638:(
615:(
606::
602:@
585:(
579::
575:@
453:(
404:(
351:(
330:(
309:(
292:.
244:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
