317:
anything that even has a scent of negative that anyone feels like raising about a person, they are often poorly sourced at best, and they have little or no context. I am generally in favor of integrating real, notable controversies into the main text and/or footnotes of biographies, or sometimes having entire separate articles devoted to a specific major controversy with a pointer tag on the main subject's article (e.g., Whitewater). I'm not clear what is being suggested here: if it is to just move the controversies into this article by dumping them into a "controversies" section, I oppose it. But if someone wants to look at how the real ones could be integrated into the text/notes of the article on a one-by-one basis, I'd be interested in that. We've been trying to do that at
1419:. The Knowledge (XXG) does not have guidelines regarding different types of Nobel winners which is why I mentioned the Nobel section in the Einstein article. Also, it is not uncomon in historical texts to record public reaction, negative or positive, to an event which is why I questioned the term "recentism." In addition, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is not from the U.S. and George W. Bush and former President Bill Clinton are not candidates, but they are the kind of voices a history text might record in terms of public reaction. In order to find middle ground, I removed the names to prevent the list from becoming too long, rewrote the sentence and added a BBC reference which should further globalize the reactions. -
321:, and in fact an editor did a huge job of assigning places for the various major, minor and utterly trivial controversies that had gravitated to the separate controversy article, and I think it was working until another editor recreated the problem by insisting on a "controversies" section that "summarized" them again - so back to square one. I'm not actually sure where we stand on that now as I took a break from reading it, but the concept, to me, of integrating controversies into appropriate text and notes is much preferable to separating them. So - what is being proposed here?
1818:
to have your opinion, of course... But I am not the only person that thinks that it should be there, again - read the thread... The original name of the section was "Al Gore in popular culture". All right, my point of view little bit more detailed: I think, that wiki page about Al Gore shouldn't be only about what Al Gore did himself, it should be also about how is Al Gore viewed by the others, by media... about what is a world's opinion about him and his activity... about what kind of references points at him. However, as I said, I respect your point of view.
411:. If this article were half the length, the controversies article were three times better written, and I were a wingnut with a grudge, this might be a close call. It isn't. This article is way too long to be considering merges right now and the controversies article is (like all WP controversies articles) a poorly-written set of smears notable only for the way the cable TV public eats them up. It's useful only as a honeypot to keep Knowledge (XXG)'s more orcish denizens off of the biography article.
777:
the "average american," when he is not an average
American. You ought to compare all Al Gore with others who are as wealthy as he is. Unlessn you be wanten to hold up some homeless man sleeping under a bridge as the model US citizen when it comes to conserving energy. I am happy George Bush is president and not Al Gore, but I don't understand why so many conservatives feel compelled to take cheap pot shots at the man. I am thinking Americans are incapable of honest critical thinking.
1630:
establish section "Al Gore - referenced in popular culture" where the SP episode would be mentioned. You are systemathicaly and unfairly trying to hide negative sides of media presentation of Al Gore, pushing a single sided view to
Knowledge (XXG) - the most independent encyklopedy on the Internet. I do not want to tolerate it! Please, someone, do something. There is no excuse like "Al Gore was in no way involved with this." for not mentioning it. He was referenced there!
240:"what does 'like' and 'don't like' have to do with anything" - reread your own comment, for christsake. you were the one who said it. sheesh. as for removing the tag, you removed it inappropriately. the tag does not carry with it any requirement as to the currency of the discussion. a month is not all that long, except perhaps to crack addicts. no consensus was formed; this article needs work to at least acknowledge that gore isn't the second coming of cheezewhiz.
31:
1326:
not more than one, maybe two, paragraphs (and that includes his eventual Nobel lecture). Who congratulated him and minor details like that belong on WikiNews (of course that article can be linked from here). Extensive quotes like those currently given in this article belong not in a biography of him, but on Gore's WikiQuotes page. For a similar example, take a look at
1063:
course obvious to any casual observer, but it has now also been determined by a court in the UK. So a reference to this court decision, would make sense. iii) How do I get permission to edit this (and other restricted entries)? It seems to me, many political entries need re-balancing, and I could provide such balance. 16:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
207:
stuffing all of it under a wikilink under "see also" is a whitewash. i came to this article looking for details on the fundraising gore performed from the whitehouse - and was surprised to not find a single mention. i agree that the data from the controversy article would need cleanup before merging; that's rather implicit in a proper merge.
804:
actuality, there were two
Supreme Court decisions, both announced on the same day. The first was 7-2 that the Florida recount was unconstitutional, and the second was 5-4 that no constitutionally valid recount could be completed by the December 12 deadline. The article incorrectly reports it as one 5-4 decision.
1899:
What about the fact that his daughter worked on
Futurama? It seems likely (though I have no sources) that this may have influenced his decision to voice for the show. Do people think that is worth mentioning? If so, feel free to add it, since I probably can not edit this page with my newbie account.
1667:
2Anon. That's a load of bull. I am trying to keep quality standards up on the page but am completely overwhelmed by pov pushing concern trolls who care more about pushing what they think is right than quality standards and improving articles. You just can't stand to see someone you hate win the Nobel
1371:
The list of US presidential candidates is really out of place. Worse than recentism, it's also US-centrism of the worst kind. I'd suggest cutting. I don't think we need to remind people that the Nobel prize is a big deal. Listing a bunch of people involved is an election campaign inside the U.S.,
1352:
I removed one quote, however, the other is Gore's acceptance speech, not just a quote, and thus worthy of inclusion. The list of individuals who have gone on record to recognize him are notable as an indication of public reaction to the prize. I'm not certain how any of this qualifies as "recentism".
1016:
You don't think he should receive the prize. Fine. It doesn't follow that we need to include criticism. If there is some notable critic of him getting the Prize, that can be mentioned sure. But we certainly need more than your dislike. As for "many scientists", that has all been discussed before
803:
The article states "Gore publicly conceded the election after the
Supreme Court of the United States in Bush v. Gore ruled 5-4 that the Florida recount was unconstitutional and that no constitutionally valid recount could be completed by the December 12 deadline, effectively ending the recounts." In
492:
of it. The general tendency amongst
Knowledge (XXG)'s pro-smear crowd is that anything which gets into the New York Times is fully worthy of inclusion into somebody's biography, whether a word of it is true or not, simply because it "appeared prominently in the mainstream media". There has sadly been
1817:
By "the reference did appear there" I meant "the reference is now on the Al Gore's wiki page as someone has already added it" (it was not any kind of compelling argument and that's why I said that further discussion was more or less meaningless). I never called you a "worst editor". You have a right
1381:
Excellent points, 137.82.36.216. Actually, I used the example of a recent recipient of the Peace Prize because Nobels for Peace and for scientific subjects such as
Physics (in the case of Einstein) are completely different types of subjects. You made the excellent point that it is not only recentism
1325:
The very large section currently in the article regarding the Peace Prize-- with two very long boxed quotes, and including what
Presidential candidates congratulated him (??) is obviously a case of recentism at work. The Nobel needs to be included in the Awards and Honors section as a subsection, in
1062:
i) The tone of this article is genarally pro-Gore biased and admiring. Any criticism is immediately mitigated with yet another admiring quote. Wiki is supposed to be objective, but this article certainly is not. ii) "An
Inconvenient Truth" is not a documentary, it is a propaganda film. This is of
776:
Everyone who invests in alternative energy stands more to gain than those who don't. I guess you would be happy if Gore invested in oil stocks instead of alternative energy. Oh, then you would call him a hypocrite. Obviously, anyone you disagree with can't win. And why would you compare Al Gore to
1953:
I'm new to
Knowledge (XXG), so sorry if this is not the correct format. Al Gore did not win an Oscar. "An Inconvenient Truth", the documentary in which he starred, won an Oscar, but it was awarded to executive producer Davis Guggenheim. Al Gore was brought up on stage and has rightfully received
1763:
OH, you are so right. Trying to remove a South Park reference that Al Gore had nothing to do with makes me the worst editor on this page. You are so right. You seem to know everything really well. You're just making South Park fanboys everywhere really happy. Good luck with that. "the reference did
968:
What about possibly preventing future conflicts over oil or other energy resources (if his global warming worries lead to better energy sources/more-efficient use)? I also agree with the principal behind the above anon contributor--global warming could lead to environmental changes (like droughts,
344:
In any case: I generally oppose separate controversy sections and articles, because in my experience they invariably become dumping grounds for anything that even has a scent of negative that anyone feels like raising about a person, they are often poorly sourced at best, and they have little or no
316:
Yeah, I saw the discussion two sections up, but I thought from the newly-added tag on the page that there must be an ongoing discussion that I was missing. In any case: I generally oppose separate controversy sections and articles, because in my experience they invariably become dumping grounds for
196:
I don't like being reverted and reprimanded by someone who hasn't taken the time to actually look into an issue. I wouldn't call it a "nastygram", just a way to get your attention. I leave messages on user talk pages so as not to disrupt article talk pages. It's a pretty common thing to do, however
141:
s wiki entry and all the controversies linked to him are included in the wiki page under his name, not on an off-shoot page, so I'm thus retracting my own gut reaction (hehe) and saying Al's controversies should belong on this same article, as well. How was that for confusing? Just my take, since
1713:
2Turtlescrubberr: Well, at first, sorry I haven't signed there... It is not true that I hate Al Gore (I made my home page to look similar to his, i.e.), I just think - and look at other people's reaction in this thread - that your activity is actually more against the quality of the page. However,
1463:
That is a pretty unfair argument as the section we are talking about is called "Al Gore in popular culture". This episode has to be at least mentioned there, because it shows the contrary (and in my opinion understandable) view at the personality of Al Gore. Dear colleagues, I appeal to you to be
906:
It actually makes sense if you think about it. The IPCC and Al Gore have worked towards a non violent resolution of the climate change problem, towards an increase in fraternity between the nations on the issue of climate change and ultimately by attempting to address the issue of climate change,
1965:
agreed. i've reverted the inappropriate addition of this in the 'awards' section. mr. gore did not earn an academy award. for example, the movie "The Departed" won an academy award as best picture. Jack Nicholson starred in the movie, but did not earn an academy award. he is not listed as having
1629:
2Turtlescrubberr: You seem to be a great fan of mister Gore. I respect it. However, if the section's name remains, I do not see any reason, why not to include reference to SouthPark. If you rename the section to (for example) "Al Gore's activities in popular culture", it is OK. Then I suggest to
749:
The article mentions that he and his wife drive hybrid vehicles. (Actually, I think his son drove a hybrid in southern California recently.) But the article does not mention that his household using more electricity per month than the average American uses in a year. This has been in the news
530:
I realize that this is not supposed to be a political issue, but all people will have some unavoidable bias when deciding about this issue. I have noticed that, in general, pages about republicans tend to have controversies included whereas domocrat's are seperate. In any case, I beleive that a
206:
you were reverted appropriately - what you 'like' or 'don't like' is immaterial. month-old discussion is still discussion, and still valid, certainly absent a consensus being hammered out; none such obtained. this article ignores all controversy about mr. gore, and that inappropriate and POV;
1205:
Al Gore should not be credited as an Academy Award winner. Academy records list Davis Guggenheim as the sole Oscar winner for Best Documentary Feature for An Inconvenient Truth. The media has definitely perpetuated the notion that Gore himself won an Oscar; however, this is incorrect.
979:
Al Gore should not have received the Nobel Peace Prize. I think there should be criticism about it. I am skeptical about the Global warming and its so-called 'threat'. There are many skeptics who have criticized the the choice of Gore. We should mention the criticism in the article.
2007:
I just had to concur with everybody. I have seen countless news articles and tv comedy skits stating that he won the Oscar, when he actually did not. It really does my head in. They make it seem as if he is challenging Rita Moreno for major performing arts awards wins ( 1 of each)
1382:
but also US-centrism to include a list of 5 or so candidates for president (an election which will be over next year and therefore make these people's congratulations almost completelely irrelevant). It belongs in WikiNews. Here is the link to the Wikinews article:
1094:
I disagree: a disambiguation page would be a good idea, though not for the reason given here. A dab page is needed because there are multiple 'Al Gore' articles to disambiguate between, not just this one and the two family members linked at the top: there's also
946:
What is the connection between global warming and global peace? You will find out when the N. Pole is the only place on Earth above water and cool enough for human existence! The CIA knows what exactly what effects global warming will have on world peace.
174:
Two sections up a full month ago. Anyway, the controversies article is too long and of much poorer quality than this one. It would have to be seriously reduced for any merge not to negatively affect the lenght and quality of this article. That's my opinion.
854:
Our article says it should go: "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses". Climate change what ?
1256:
1557:
It's true that the section is mostly about things Gore has personally done and not about references to Gore. However, there are many articles that have a "references to X in popular culture" section; perhaps we could make it a separate section?
1315:
The Peace Prize shared by Gore and the IPCC must be the first time ever that this prize has been given for non-peace work. Isn't this worthy of a mention? Surely I'm not the only one asking how on Earth Gore and the IPCC won the PEACE PRIZE!
1531:
Al Gore was in no way involved with this. This section is about what al gore has done. Saturday night live appearances, lending his voice among other things. Al Gore was in no way involved with this show so it does not belong on the page.
226:
See, this is why I used your talk page. What does "like" and "dont like" have to do with anything. There hasn't been discussion on the talk page for a full month and that is the only reason I removed the tag. Don't lie and misrepresent my
184:
is there some particular reason you chose to leave a nastygram on my user discussion page, ignoring the caveat therein? naturally, i've deleted it, but i'm curious why an answer to your question is somehow deserving of a snarky personal
1934:
has been involved in promoting the notion of Al Gore having a "stiff and emotionless persona" that Gore might have been trying to shake off by taking part in Futurama. Anyhow, the references to Gore in episodes such as
1228:
The paragraph on climate change is disjointed. Why is Cameron Diaz mentioned at all? That sentence seems very minor compared to other details mentioned, and the opening paragraphs are supposed to summarize the main
268:
a little work on reading comprehension on your part would have avoided virtually all of this. but you're right - carrying on a "conversation" with you is an exercise in misdirection. have a good life. Merge?
563:
Added trivia tag under the pop culture section. If no one objects I am going to go through this section and remove all unsourced material and pop culture references that Al Gore did not take part in.
1479:
I also think it's important to include this reference as Gore himself has commented on it (see my latest edit). Without it this article does paint a somewhat rosy picture of the man. Thoughts? --
1096:
367:
1450:
Al Gore doesn't appear in that episode. He is not actually involved in that episode in anyway. He didn't lend his voice or his approval, which makes it unsuitable for the section.
750:
repeatedly. The article also does not mention how much Al Gore would personally gain if his carbon offset trading program was put in place. Let the article tell the whole story.
505:
Merge begun per consistancy standards (See ALL other political figures) ...there is ZERO REASON that controversies should be diverted (hidden) elsewhere regardless of politics.) (
1498:
Indeed. The section is about references to Al Gore in popular culture. This South Park episode clearly referenced Gore and was notable, since (according to the Chicago Sun Times
1909:
Al Gore drive a gas guzler and has his own plane that wastese thousands of gallons of gas. He is not against global warming but wants you to be against it (Your Mom 1996)
1120:
As far as I can tell; he's the second person ever to win a Nobel Prize and an Academy Award after George Bernard Shaw; is it worthy to be mentioned however? Your thoughts?
1103:. I think it makes sense to have all those articles listed together on one page, rather than linked at various points through this article as they are at the moment.
1867:
as a subsection. Indeed, I see no need - at least not until the list grows much longer - to categorize references by whether or not they are satirical in nature.--
1262:
259:
Jeebus. A little work on coherency would be nice. Why don't you use this talk page for the discussion of the article because this "conversation" is going nowhere.
134:
to a merger, but since I don't normally follow biographies of living political figures, that's all this is -- a gut reaction. I did quickly glance at
996:. According to a British judge, some of the assertions in Al Gore's Oscar-winning environmental documentary are not supported by scientific evidence
421:
How do we handle the criticsm then? There are many who don't think Al Gore is a prophet on environmentalism is there a place for pointing that out?
1442:
Al Gore also appears in the South Park episode 1006 "ManBearPig", by the way. Maybe worth mentioning, as the whole episode is dedicated to him...
1954:
much of the credit for the film, but he did not win an Oscar for it (the official Oscar website and IMDB.com both correctly state this fact).
1372:
isn't going to help with that, anyway. If you really think you need a list of congratulators, how about a list of international leaders? --
441:
then it should not be all positive. Look at other figures: Bush, Bill O'Rielley etc criticsm is allowed on those pages why not this one?
1916:
1283:
1213:
1136:
954:
929:
784:
653:
807:
At one point this was reported accurately in wikipedia.org. Why has it been allowed to revert to the current inaccurate statement?
1075:. The current note at the top of this article puts a world spotlight on his ill-starred son, who presumably would suffer further. --
814:
1298:
Is an award given in Spain, mostly notable in Spanish speaking countries, however it also awards people from all over the world..
1994:
1877:
Question: What does the POV tag have to do with anything? As far as I know, the dispute here is not related to any POV and the
1299:
1416:
1188:
How come the nobel prize isn't showing up in his infobox? Is there a problem with our "Vice President" infobox tempalte?
456:
545:. If Republican articles are bad then they should be improved, rather than bringing other articles down to match them.
371:
38:
359:
1344:
has a section specifically devoted to the Nobel, so there is nothing wrong with granting an entire section to it:
736:
632:
619:
130:
I'm not sure who suggested it (I'm a newcomer to this page; just added it to my watchlist). My gut reaction was
1085:
The correct fix for this is to remove any BLP issues from his son's article, not to add layers of indirection.
1072:
997:
1851:
Currently the section containing Al Gore as portrayed without his participation in popular culture is called
1287:
1217:
1132:
933:
1920:
958:
788:
642:
493:
no real drive to oppose this criterion for inclusion, so we're lumbered with random "controversy" articles.
97:
89:
84:
1982:
1912:
1279:
1209:
1124:
950:
925:
818:
810:
780:
602:
444:
318:
72:
67:
59:
1317:
2009:
1940:
1868:
1499:
1373:
1128:
1100:
763:
1240:
1170:
532:
355:
725:
387:: Since I don't like him, I want people to see why they shouldn't like him when they visit his page.
1039:
1000:
981:
907:
towards a reduction into the potential for future conflict because of the effects of climate change.
890:
838:
595:
1986:
1979:
In this case, we should adjust the first paragraph to note this adjustment. Does anyone disagree?
1383:
431:
A weblog? This is an encyclopedia, not some forum for airing your annoyances at random celebrities.
1990:
1955:
1765:
1669:
1597:
1533:
1451:
1443:
1104:
564:
398:
283:
260:
228:
198:
176:
1901:
1890:
1567:
1510:
690:
678:
448:
422:
886:
628:
1017:
ad infinitum. How that list is many compared to the totality of scientists, I have no idea. --
374:
or something. Separating content out into an arbitrary "controversies" article is just bad. —
1420:
1363:
1354:
1157:
834:
608:
468:
1967:
1936:
1391:
1331:
1230:
1146:
1086:
1076:
869:
767:
546:
521:
494:
452:
432:
412:
274:
241:
208:
186:
162:
542:
1480:
1341:
1330:, where the Peace Prize is briefly mentioned in the intro, under Humanitarian Work, etc.--
1596:
Let's please not start a trivia section. That is what your suggestion will devolve into.
1966:
earned an academy award for starring in "The Departed". exactly the same applies here.
1819:
1715:
1631:
1465:
1189:
908:
467:
Anything encyclopedic and reliably sourced can be merged into this article, subject to
388:
375:
329:
303:
118:
1464:
rational and not to deny unpleasant facts about references to Al Gore in pop-culture.
1883:
1560:
1503:
1018:
889:? Kid, Gore should not have won the Nobel Prize. There should be criticism about it.
574:
149:
110:
Where exactly is this being discussed, and who suggested it? Maybe I'm missing this.
1931:
1327:
970:
856:
753:
685:
673:
646:
506:
136:
47:
17:
1859:. I should like to see this be made more general by changing the main section to
799:
Supreme Court decisions regarding 2000 Presidential Election Inaccurately Reported
751:
488:
of it is notable for any reason other then its own self-perpetuation, and there's
1714:
the reference did appear there, so there is no reason to discuss it anymore. ;o)
1302:
993:
There are many scientist who are skeptical about the 'threats' of Global warming
665:
658:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1384:
http://en.wikinews.org/Al_Gore_and_Climate_Panel_awarded_Nobel_Peace_prize_2007
1668:
Peace Prize and the you come to this page to "do somthing boud it". Whatever.
697:
2012:
1998:
1970:
1958:
1943:
1924:
1904:
1894:
1871:
1822:
1768:
1718:
1672:
1600:
1571:
1536:
1514:
1483:
1454:
1423:
1394:
1376:
1366:
1357:
1334:
1320:
1305:
1291:
1243:
1233:
1221:
1192:
1173:
1160:
1149:
1107:
1089:
1079:
1042:
1021:
1003:
994:
984:
973:
962:
937:
911:
893:
872:
859:
841:
822:
792:
770:
756:
739:
635:
622:
577:
567:
549:
535:
524:
509:
497:
475:
472:
460:
435:
425:
415:
401:
391:
378:
333:
323:
306:
286:
277:
263:
244:
231:
211:
201:
189:
179:
165:
152:
142:
no one else seems to be talking about the request for comment on the merger.
122:
112:
1272:
What about the Prince of Asturias Award? He won it before the Noble Prize.
702:
1930:
Just a thought: It may be interesting to point out how Matt Groening's
161:
where is it being discussed? right here on this page, two sections up.
1386:
Feel free to add all you want at that link, Classicfilms. This is a
922:
what exactly would be a non-peaceful resolution to climate change?
358:, and should not be used. If the article is too long, it should be
1347:
1239:
Al Gore is going to be the next President of the United States ;-)
868:
Take it off Knowledge (XXG), kids. This isn't a discussion forum.
657:, Vice President of the United States from 1993 to 2001, his wife
847:
Yeah -.-. What the hell does climate change have to do with the
1169:
Someone should add the Nobel Laureate category to the listing.
969:
floods, heat, cold) that cause problems with food sources, etc
25:
601:
Oct. 17 2007.: Gore is scheduled to speak to the prestigious
837:
in 2007?! What? I am stunned! Anyway, a winner is a winner.
1156:
And the only person to have won both of those and an Emmy.
1390:
case of recentism, although your changes did improve it.--
1348:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Albert_Einstein#The_Nobel_Prize
1099:, the articles for his two Presidential campaigns, and
1097:
Al Gore's contributions to the Internet and technology
368:
Al Gore's contributions to the Internet and technology
584:
Gore, 36%; Hillary, 32%; Obama, 16%; and Edwards, 8%.
999:. Someone should add some criticism in the article.
520:, not consistently bad. Go fix the other articles.
302:When did they repeal the rules about civility? —
1764:appear there" is a really compelling argument.
531:standard should be set for all pages to follow.
1038:I have added criticism by notable individuals.
1362:I also shortened and tweaked the paragraph. -
471:. There is no need for a separate article. --
8:
611:winner will be announced, in Oslo, Norway
397:At least you are honest. I respect that.
614:unnoticed Presidential campaign of 2008
1857:Al Gore appearances in popular culture
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
516:The project aims to be consistently
350:Very much so. And "Controversy"
197:it didn't seem to work this time.
24:
1071:I propose a disambiguation page:
1881:of the section is not disputed.
1865:Participation in popular culture
372:Al Gore and environmental issues
29:
636:21:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
525:10:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
510:19:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
498:08:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
484:The problem is that basically
476:23:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
461:20:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
436:19:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
426:19:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
416:15:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
402:15:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
392:06:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
1939:seem worth acknowledging. --
1863:and adding something akin to
1861:References in popular culture
1446:22:02, 12 october 2007 (CET)
1276:what is the asturias award?
833:Al Gore is the winner of the
740:08:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
623:08:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
578:00:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
568:19:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
379:17:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
334:19:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
307:17:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
287:21:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
278:20:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
264:20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
245:20:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
232:19:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
212:19:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
202:19:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
190:19:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
180:18:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
166:18:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
153:16:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
123:03:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
2013:22:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1999:00:52, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1971:23:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1959:21:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1944:18:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
1925:01:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
1905:21:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1895:17:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1872:18:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
1855:, and it is a subsection of
1823:17:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
1769:14:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
1719:13:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
1673:01:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
1601:17:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1572:17:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1537:17:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1515:17:46, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1484:23:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1455:20:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1424:14:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1395:03:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1377:00:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1367:18:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1358:18:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1335:18:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1321:04:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1306:19:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1292:16:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1244:10:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1234:18:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1222:22:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1193:17:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1174:15:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1161:13:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1150:10:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1108:14:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1090:10:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1080:10:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1043:09:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1022:13:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1004:12:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
985:09:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
974:05:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
963:21:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
938:14:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
912:13:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
894:09:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
873:10:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
860:10:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
842:09:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
793:21:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
654:Albert Arnold "Al" Gore, Jr.
1501:) he even commented on it.
1468:1:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
823:06:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
771:13:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
757:12:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
550:07:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
536:04:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
2029:
1438:Al Gore in popular culture
1116:Nobel Prize/Academy Award
354:are even worse. They're
282:Yes, I am right. Thanks.
1250:Inconvenient Truth Links
1139:) 11:51, 12 October 2007
1073:Al Gore (disambiguation)
885:Thumperward, what about
1145:Definitely noteworthy.
645:(1907-1998), his wife:
643:Albert Arnold Gore, Sr.
598:(on the climate crisis)
594:Leonardo DiCaprio film
1853:Satirization by others
1634:21:41, 15 October 2007
319:Hillary Rodham Clinton
1257:An Inconvenient Truth
1101:Al Gore controversies
764:Al Gore controversies
711:Anna Schiff (2001 - )
701:(1979 - ) married to
689:(1977 - ) married to
677:(1973 - ) married to
603:Chicago Economic Club
541:There is a standard:
42:of past discussions.
661:, and his children:
596:The 11th Hour (film)
106:Controversies merger
745:Article is not NPOV
1949:Gore and Oscar Win
762:Y-awn. Take it to
326:
115:
2001:
1985:comment added by
1927:
1915:comment added by
1417:assume good faith
1311:Nobel Peace Prize
1294:
1282:comment added by
1224:
1212:comment added by
1141:
1127:comment added by
965:
953:comment added by
940:
928:comment added by
835:Nobel Peace Prize
825:
813:comment added by
795:
783:comment added by
631:(17.Sept.2007.)--
609:Nobel Peace Prize
463:
447:comment added by
332:
322:
121:
111:
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2020:
1980:
1937:Bart on the Road
1910:
1886:
1563:
1506:
1277:
1207:
1147:Chris Cunningham
1140:
1121:
1087:Chris Cunningham
1067:Al Gore dab page
948:
923:
870:Chris Cunningham
808:
778:
768:Chris Cunningham
726:Nancy LaFon Gore
547:Chris Cunningham
522:Chris Cunningham
495:Chris Cunningham
442:
433:Chris Cunningham
413:Chris Cunningham
328:
117:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2019:
2018:
2017:
1951:
1884:
1561:
1504:
1440:
1342:Albert Einstein
1340:The article on
1313:
1270:
1252:
1122:
1118:
1069:
1060:
1040:Masterpiece2000
1001:Masterpiece2000
982:Masterpiece2000
891:Masterpiece2000
839:Masterpiece2000
831:
801:
747:
708:Wyatt (1999 - )
586:
561:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2026:
2024:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1974:
1973:
1950:
1947:
1875:
1874:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1766:Turtlescrubber
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1670:Turtlescrubber
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1598:Turtlescrubber
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1534:Turtlescrubber
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1458:
1457:
1452:Turtlescrubber
1439:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1350:
1345:
1318:124.180.37.195
1312:
1309:
1296:
1295:
1269:
1268:Asturias Award
1266:
1265:
1264:
1259:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1226:
1225:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1164:
1163:
1153:
1152:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1068:
1065:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
988:
987:
944:
943:
942:
941:
917:
916:
915:
914:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
878:
877:
876:
875:
863:
862:
852:
830:
827:
800:
797:
774:
773:
746:
743:
733:
732:
731:
730:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
709:
694:
682:
670:
639:
616:
615:
612:
606:
599:
591:
590:
585:
582:
581:
580:
565:Turtlescrubber
560:
559:Trivia section
557:
555:
553:
552:
528:
527:
503:
502:
501:
500:
479:
478:
439:
438:
419:
418:
405:
404:
399:Turtlescrubber
389:Isaac Pankonin
382:
381:
360:split up into
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
284:Turtlescrubber
261:Turtlescrubber
250:
249:
248:
247:
235:
234:
229:Turtlescrubber
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
199:Turtlescrubber
177:Turtlescrubber
169:
168:
158:
157:
156:
155:
146:My Vote: MERGE
143:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2025:
2016:
2014:
2011:
2010:69.28.232.214
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1972:
1969:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1960:
1957:
1948:
1946:
1945:
1942:
1941:TheFinalFraek
1938:
1933:
1928:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1917:69.249.50.145
1914:
1907:
1906:
1903:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1887:
1880:
1873:
1870:
1869:TheFinalFraek
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1824:
1821:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1770:
1767:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1720:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1674:
1671:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1633:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1538:
1535:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1500:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1485:
1482:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1467:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1456:
1453:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1437:
1425:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1396:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1375:
1374:137.82.36.216
1370:
1369:
1368:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1356:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1329:
1323:
1322:
1319:
1310:
1308:
1307:
1304:
1300:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:190.42.211.71
1281:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1267:
1263:
1261:Link to book
1260:
1258:
1255:Link to film
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1232:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:72.146.27.235
1211:
1204:
1203:
1194:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1129:121.217.9.170
1126:
1115:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1074:
1066:
1064:
1057:
1055:
1044:
1041:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1023:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1002:
998:
995:
992:
991:
990:
989:
986:
983:
978:
977:
976:
975:
972:
966:
964:
960:
956:
955:66.229.61.232
952:
939:
935:
931:
930:74.193.247.56
927:
921:
920:
919:
918:
913:
910:
905:
904:
903:
902:
895:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
874:
871:
867:
866:
865:
864:
861:
858:
853:
850:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
836:
828:
826:
824:
820:
816:
812:
805:
798:
796:
794:
790:
786:
785:66.229.61.232
782:
772:
769:
765:
761:
760:
759:
758:
755:
752:
744:
742:
741:
738:
729:(1938 - 1984)
728:
727:
723:
722:
721:
720:
710:
707:
706:
704:
700:
699:
695:
692:
688:
687:
683:
680:
676:
675:
671:
668:
667:
663:
662:
660:
656:
655:
651:
650:
648:
644:
641:
640:
638:
637:
634:
630:
625:
624:
621:
613:
610:
607:
604:
600:
597:
593:
592:
589:missing info:
588:
587:
583:
579:
576:
573:Go for it. --
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
558:
556:
551:
548:
544:
540:
539:
538:
537:
534:
526:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
511:
508:
499:
496:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
480:
477:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
437:
434:
430:
429:
428:
427:
424:
417:
414:
410:
407:
406:
403:
400:
396:
395:
394:
393:
390:
386:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
363:
357:
353:
349:
348:
347:
346:
335:
331:
325:
320:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
288:
285:
281:
280:
279:
276:
272:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
246:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
230:
225:
213:
210:
205:
204:
203:
200:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
188:
183:
182:
181:
178:
173:
172:
171:
170:
167:
164:
160:
159:
154:
151:
147:
144:
140:
138:
133:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
120:
114:
105:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2006:
1952:
1932:The Simpsons
1929:
1908:
1898:
1882:
1878:
1876:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1559:
1502:
1441:
1421:Classicfilms
1387:
1364:Classicfilms
1355:Classicfilms
1328:Jimmy Carter
1324:
1314:
1297:
1271:
1241:77.210.63.60
1227:
1171:64.81.229.99
1158:Allegrorondo
1119:
1070:
1061:
1053:
971:Jason McHuff
967:
945:
848:
832:
806:
802:
775:
748:
734:
724:
696:
686:Kristin Gore
684:
674:Karenna Gore
672:
664:
652:
649:, father of
647:Pauline Gore
627:Al Gore won
626:
617:
562:
554:
533:75.3.226.246
529:
517:
504:
489:
485:
440:
420:
409:Do not merge
408:
384:
383:
361:
351:
343:
342:
301:
270:
145:
137:Bill Clinton
135:
131:
109:
78:
43:
37:
18:Talk:Al Gore
1981:—Preceding
1911:—Preceding
1392:Gloriamarie
1332:Gloriamarie
1278:—Preceding
1231:Gloriamarie
1208:—Preceding
1123:—Preceding
1077:Ancheta Wis
949:—Preceding
924:—Preceding
815:70.20.67.91
809:—Preceding
779:—Preceding
737:Tamás Kádár
691:Paul Cusack
679:Drew Schiff
666:Al Gore III
659:Tipper Gore
633:Tamás Kádár
620:Tamás Kádár
443:—Preceding
36:This is an
1968:Anastrophe
1879:neutrality
1481:Owain loft
1415:Please do
1229:article.--
698:Sarah Gore
629:Emmy-award
364:sub-topics
275:Anastrophe
242:Anastrophe
209:Anastrophe
187:Anastrophe
163:Anastrophe
98:Archive 15
90:Archive 12
85:Archive 11
79:Archive 10
2015:samusek2
1987:Schalliol
1820:joshis.cz
1716:joshis.cz
1632:joshis.cz
1466:joshis.cz
1190:PyroGamer
909:Nil Einne
669:(1982 - )
376:Omegatron
356:POV forks
345:context.
304:Omegatron
227:position.
73:Archive 9
68:Archive 8
60:Archive 5
1995:contribs
1983:unsigned
1956:Brosenbe
1913:unsigned
1885:Melsaran
1562:Melsaran
1505:Melsaran
1444:Big-B_36
1280:unsigned
1210:unsigned
1137:contribs
1125:unsigned
1105:Terraxos
1019:Horoball
951:unsigned
926:unsigned
887:WP:Civil
811:unsigned
781:unsigned
703:Bill Lee
575:jpgordon
457:contribs
445:unsigned
352:articles
185:comment.
150:Ageekgal
1902:She val
857:Helixdq
754:RonCram
507:20seven
469:WP:NPOV
366:, like
362:neutral
39:archive
1303:Juglar
851:prize.
543:WP:BLP
449:Kirin4
423:Kirin4
1388:clear
849:peace
829:What?
385:Merge
370:, or
16:<
1991:talk
1961:Ben
1921:talk
1891:talk
1568:talk
1511:talk
1288:talk
1218:talk
1133:talk
1058:Tone
959:talk
934:talk
819:talk
789:talk
518:good
490:tons
486:none
473:John
453:talk
330:talk
324:Tvoz
119:talk
113:Tvoz
271:yes
1997:)
1993:•
1923:)
1893:)
1570:)
1513:)
1316:--
1301:--
1290:)
1220:)
1135:•
961:)
936:)
855:--
821:)
791:)
766:.
735:--
705:.
618:--
512:)
459:)
455:•
273:.
148:-
132:No
94:→
64:←
1989:(
1919:(
1889:(
1566:(
1509:(
1353:-
1286:(
1216:(
1131:(
957:(
932:(
817:(
787:(
693:.
681:.
605:.
451:(
327:|
139:'
116:|
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.