429:) It does not fall under deletion guidelines G4. BTW, it makes no sense to nominate only the English copy for deletion give that it was the crash of an American-made airliner on American soil flown by an American civilian flight crew operated by an American airline. The current version is quite an improvement in word count and grammar. And deleting only the English version makes no sense given that it is formated almost exactly like the Russian language article, with some minor improvements. As for notablity, just read modern runway lighting laws, hence it started a precendent for change. And yes, the original should have been deleted at the time due to poor grammar, wording, formatting, and factual errors. But such errors were fuxed, hence your reason for deletion G4 has no merit.--
357:), changing policy. As for the lack of secondary sources, the crash was in 1961, hence very few secondary sources are available online, but the incident was in the media and qualified for a federal investigation. There is also a version of the article on the Russian Knowledge, and if it is significant enough for Russian Knowledge being an American-based air crash, then it is significant enough for English Knowledge. The crash is not a fringe topic, stand-alone event, or minor event; the accident was caused by an incredible error, setting precedent for regulations we have today. "An event that is a precedent or catalyst for something else of lasting significance is likely to be notable." Deleting this goes against "Don't rush to delete articles" (
238:
320:
53:
143:
77:
396:) this is not identical to the previous, it is translation of existing unchallenged copy on Russian Knowledge. "This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies"--
22:
215:
204:
193:
182:
171:
87:
270:
489:
Yes, I read the deleted article. It should have been deleted because it was terrible, or at least seriously improved. As for significance, the reason the origianl was deleted (I read the discussion) was because factual inaccuracies about the details of the crash led to confusion about notability
352:
the article is significant. The accident caused human fatalities, The accident involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport. The people in the accident killed were employees of a civilian airline, and the crash was investigated by the Civil
Aeronautics Board report. It also
490:(if it was civilian or military). My point is that the G4 template should be removed because the criteria is clear that it only applies if the content was identical or nearly identical in the first place, it is not. The aircraft crashed landing in conditions that would not be legal today.--
456:
Thanks for answering how, and I assume you reviewed the deleted article before writing this one. Other
Wikipedias have their own deletion guidelines, so the existence of an article on another Knowledge is irrelevant. But you generally can't restore a deleted article without going through
290:
349:
247:
63:
300:
538:
475:
But shouldn't G4 be removed because the article will be deleted automatically before consensus if reached? And the article doesn't even quality under G4 guidelines.--
528:
156:
142:
523:
330:
533:
518:
378:. Plus remember, Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents is guidelines, it is better to keep than delete.--
117:
374:
And the cause of the accident was not like most, (pilot error), rather an unusual event of the lack of runway lights being on. (
99:
58:
33:
495:
480:
434:
401:
383:
365:
104:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
276:
105:
491:
476:
430:
397:
379:
361:
326:
39:
461:. If the CSD fails, the I will take the article to AFD, where community consensus can be determined. -
348:
This page should not be speedily deleted because 1. It is the crash of a US airliner on US soil. Under
354:
269:
237:
21:
319:
451:
393:
466:
425:
Lots of websites save copies of
Wikipeda. Read the original here, compare to what I wrote;(
416:
111:
92:
499:
484:
470:
438:
420:
405:
387:
369:
512:
458:
375:
358:
76:
52:
462:
412:
82:
279:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
376:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability_(events)#Geographical_scope)
426:
359:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability_(events)#Lasting_effects)--
411:
How did you review the deleted version to make that determination? -
394:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G4
355:
https://casetext.com/case/northwest-airlines-inc-v-alaska-airlines
350:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents
314:
264:
15:
236:
141:
154:
This article has been checked against the following
153:
334:
8:
150:
47:
98:This article is within the scope of the
539:Pages translated from Russian Knowledge
49:
19:
427:http://www.rc135.com/0011/ALASKA_A.HTM
116:. To use this banner, please see the
529:Aviation accident task force articles
7:
38:It is of interest to the following
524:B-Class Aviation accident articles
14:
318:
268:
213:
202:
191:
180:
169:
85:
75:
51:
20:
275:This article was nominated for
126:Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation
1:
534:WikiProject Aviation articles
248:the Aviation accident project
245:This article is supported by
129:Template:WikiProject Aviation
353:resulted in legal action. (
555:
500:18:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
485:18:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
471:18:03, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
439:17:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
421:17:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
406:17:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
388:17:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
370:17:28, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
174:Referencing and citation:
519:B-Class aviation articles
244:
70:
46:
331:ΠΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ° DC-6 Π½Π° Π‘ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΈ
325:This article contains a
299:, November 26 2013, see
185:Coverage and accuracy:
241:
218:Supporting materials:
146:
28:This article is rated
289:, 23 April 2017, see
240:
145:
101:Aviation WikiProject
207:Grammar and style:
160:for B-class status:
344:Contested deletion
242:
147:
34:content assessment
455:
341:
340:
313:
312:
309:
308:
263:
262:
259:
258:
255:
254:
231:
230:
132:aviation articles
118:full instructions
546:
492:PlanespotterA320
477:PlanespotterA320
449:
431:PlanespotterA320
398:PlanespotterA320
380:PlanespotterA320
362:PlanespotterA320
322:
315:
281:
280:
272:
265:
221:
217:
216:
210:
206:
205:
199:
195:
194:
188:
184:
183:
177:
173:
172:
151:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
554:
553:
549:
548:
547:
545:
544:
543:
509:
508:
459:Deletion Review
346:
219:
214:
208:
203:
197:
192:
186:
181:
175:
170:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
93:Aviation portal
91:
86:
84:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
552:
550:
542:
541:
536:
531:
526:
521:
511:
510:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
487:
444:
443:
442:
441:
345:
342:
339:
338:
323:
311:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
294:
273:
261:
260:
257:
256:
253:
252:
243:
233:
232:
229:
228:
226:
224:
223:
222:
211:
200:
189:
178:
164:
163:
161:
148:
138:
137:
135:
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
551:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
516:
514:
501:
497:
493:
488:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
453:
452:edit conflict
448:
447:
446:
445:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
371:
367:
363:
360:
356:
351:
343:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
317:
316:
302:
298:
295:
292:
288:
285:
284:
283:
282:
278:
274:
271:
267:
266:
250:
249:
239:
235:
234:
227:
225:
220:criterion met
212:
209:criterion met
201:
198:criterion met
190:
187:criterion met
179:
176:criterion met
168:
167:
166:
165:
162:
159:
158:
152:
149:
144:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
114:
109:
108:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
391:
373:
347:
335:ru.wikipedia
296:
286:
246:
155:
112:
106:
100:
40:WikiProjects
327:translation
196:Structure:
113:task forces
513:Categories
301:discussion
291:discussion
107:open tasks
64:Accidents
277:deletion
157:criteria
123:Aviation
59:Aviation
392:Under (
30:B-class
463:BilCat
413:BilCat
297:delete
36:scale.
333:from
496:talk
481:talk
467:talk
435:talk
417:talk
402:talk
384:talk
366:talk
287:keep
110:and
329:of
515::
498:)
483:)
469:)
437:)
419:)
404:)
386:)
368:)
62::
494:(
479:(
465:(
454:)
450:(
433:(
415:(
400:(
382:(
364:(
337:.
303:.
293:.
251:.
120:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
