42:
220:
The article's well-written and comprehensive. It's stable and well-organized. The sources used appear extremely reliable and I have no doubt that the information's accurate (without reading the foreign sources). I'm going to pass the article with the hope that you'll still consider my suggestions.
161:
The other sections read very well. Your prose is very professional, and reads like any old journal article. My one other nitpick is the very choppy records section. I understand that writing these records in one big jumbled section would be even choppier, so I think it's fine as is.
153:- Could you clarify what "first described" means? I think it's saying that it was originally only thought to live there, and if that's the case, it wasn't described from there, unless that's where scientists described it... yes, a clarification would be nice.
165:
Yes. The species may now be well-known enough that such a detailed discussion of records is superfluous, but I think the list remains interesting (and I had fun tracking down all the records!).
176:
The sources you used seem reliable as a whole. I'm slightly confused why the IUCN source has a link to the website's homepage and the others don't, could you please clarify?
80:
47:
70:
126:
189:
I suppose you could not find any free pictures of the bat. Perhaps you could add another image of one of the other bats that's aesthetically nice?
122:
107:
52:
99:
75:
198:
115:
247:
229:
17:
141:
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. It looks rather good, and I don't have many suggestions.
261:
206:
92:
241:
223:
180:
None of the others are part of a greater work, as the IUCN Red List account is.
264:
254:
209:
151:
First described in 2001 from Greece and
Hungary, its known distribution*
134:
103:
156:The former is indeed what is meant; I've reworded.
8:
30:
201:, which looks kind of like it might be
61:
33:
7:
24:
1:
236:17:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
205:, with its white ear bases.
265:19:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
255:17:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
210:19:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
281:
199:File:Myotis mystacinus.jpg
197:. I'm interested in
89:
88:
18:Talk:Alcathoe bat
272:
252:
244:
234:
226:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
280:
279:
275:
274:
273:
271:
270:
269:
248:
242:
230:
224:
218:
187:
174:
147:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
278:
276:
268:
267:
217:
214:
213:
212:
186:
183:
182:
181:
173:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
159:
158:
157:
146:
143:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
277:
266:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
253:
251:
246:
245:
239:
235:
233:
228:
227:
215:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:M. mystacinus
193:Added one of
192:
191:
190:
184:
179:
178:
177:
171:
164:
163:
160:
155:
154:
152:
149:
148:
144:
142:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
249:
240:
237:
231:
222:
219:
202:
194:
188:
175:
150:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
260:Thank you!
104:visual edit
172:References
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
238:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
203:alcathoe
76:Criteria
216:Overall
127:history
108:history
94:Article
262:Ucucha
207:Ucucha
185:Images
243:ceran
225:ceran
145:Prose
136:Watch
16:<
250:thor
232:thor
123:edit
100:edit
125:|
106:|
102:|
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.