191:
50:
102:
81:
21:
112:
447:
It represents the successful establishment of several innovative mobile software startup companies based in the
Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, UK. Aldiscon, Apion, Aepona, Anam, Ammeon, Accuris Networks and Altion are just a handful of such Irish companies (in fact, all of these specific
347:
I put up a PROD notice on notability which was removed with a comment that the article does assert notability (but no discussion and no additional text or references added). The company appears to have been acquired back in the mid-90's, and I fail to see what was notable about the company before
381:
I provided explations in my edit summaries. First when you put on the prod tag you claimed that the article did not assert notability. If "Aldiscon is historically significant to the mobile sector in two major aspects" is not an assertion of notability then what is? That assertion on its own is
400:
Phil, you are incorrect to remove the CS7 tag without justifying notability. Please stop. Please explain and provide references to the claims within the article. I have read the article, and your edit note, and neither makes clearer the claims to notability. Your edit summary refers to an
348:
then. The article appears to be trying to asserting notability through it's relationships with other companies, or with the company that acquired it, etc, but this does not confer notability on this company. The article on the acquiring company
401:
unreferenced claim within the article and is clearly not enough to assert notability. As to the claims within the article, it makes two claims. Both claims are pretty unclear and unspecific, and most importantly, without reference. The first:
443:- What does this actually mean? Is Aldiscon claiming to be the first independent software company to supply software to a global mobile network? There are no references that I can find to back this up. Perhaps you can provide a reference?
382:
enough to get past an A7 speedy deletion, which is why I've removed the tag again, and I removed the prod tag because there is a reference to back up the claim to notability. If you are so keen to get this deleted then take it to
450:- is the article claiming that this company is notable because the people involved in Aldiscon went on to form other companies? In my view, this goes to the notability of the people involved, not the company.
209:
312:
367:@Phil, please stop removing the deletion notices until you have demonstrated why Aldiscon is notable. Twice now, you've removed deletion notices without explanation. --
168:
248:
235:
31:
506:
455:
In short, I fail to see why you are asserting that this company is notable. Please explain. I'll take your advice and list this in an AFD also. --
158:
511:
422:. Sarcastic/Snippy comments from you aside, any chance that you'll provide a reference to back up the claims of notability you are asserting? --
134:
242:
501:
222:
125:
86:
216:
203:
61:
303:
229:
27:
255:
67:
441:
successful introduction of major independent software suppliers to the technology of global mobile networks
49:
409:
391:
275:
133:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
20:
404:
You don't seem to understand the meaning of the word "assert". Please look it up in a dictionary.
483:
460:
427:
405:
387:
372:
357:
352:
includes a one-liner note, which to me, speaks to the relative notability of this company. --
268:
261:
117:
383:
292:
190:
495:
479:
456:
423:
368:
353:
107:
474:(outdent)I have found evidence of Notability in that Aldiscon invented
130:
101:
80:
349:
210:
Knowledge (XXG):Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
475:
487:
464:
431:
413:
395:
376:
361:
43:
15:
448:
companies were started by the original
Aldiscon founders)
129:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
478:. This has now been added to the article. --
8:
420:to maintain or defend (claims, rights, etc.)
249:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
236:Category:Company articles needing attention
198:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
176:
75:
47:
77:
418:Sure. dictionary.com provides this:
274:Help expand stub articles located at
143:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Companies
7:
223:Category:Unassessed company articles
123:This article is within the scope of
66:It is of interest to the following
14:
300:Tag company talk pages with the
189:
110:
100:
79:
48:
30:on June 22, 2008. The result of
19:
507:Low-importance company articles
163:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
512:WikiProject Companies articles
289:Tag company articles with the
146:Template:WikiProject Companies
1:
137:and see a list of open tasks.
180:WikiProject Companies To-do:
502:Stub-Class company articles
528:
169:project's importance scale
488:09:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
465:15:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
432:20:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
414:19:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
396:15:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
377:14:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
362:19:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
175:
162:
95:
74:
276:Category:Company stubs
56:This article is rated
313:requests for comments
304:WikiProject Companies
126:WikiProject Companies
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
62:content assessment
340:
339:
336:
335:
332:
331:
328:
327:
324:
323:
42:
41:
519:
307:
296:
262:Portal:Companies
204:Article requests
193:
186:
185:
177:
151:
150:
149:company articles
147:
144:
141:
120:
118:Companies portal
115:
114:
113:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
36:withdrawn by nom
23:
16:
527:
526:
522:
521:
520:
518:
517:
516:
492:
491:
345:
320:
317:
301:
290:
148:
145:
142:
139:
138:
116:
111:
109:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
525:
523:
515:
514:
509:
504:
494:
493:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
453:
452:
451:
444:
437:
436:
435:
434:
344:
341:
338:
337:
334:
333:
330:
329:
326:
325:
322:
321:
319:
318:
316:
315:
309:
308:project banner
298:
286:
278:
264:
251:
238:
225:
212:
197:
195:
194:
182:
181:
173:
172:
165:Low-importance
161:
155:
154:
152:
135:the discussion
122:
121:
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
524:
513:
510:
508:
505:
503:
500:
499:
497:
490:
489:
485:
481:
477:
466:
462:
458:
454:
449:
445:
442:
439:
438:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
416:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
342:
314:
310:
305:
299:
294:
288:
287:
285:
283:
279:
277:
273:
271:
270:
265:
263:
260:
258:
257:
252:
250:
247:
245:
244:
239:
237:
234:
232:
231:
226:
224:
221:
219:
218:
213:
211:
208:
206:
205:
200:
199:
196:
192:
188:
187:
184:
183:
179:
178:
174:
170:
166:
160:
157:
156:
153:
136:
132:
128:
127:
119:
108:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
473:
446:
440:
419:
406:Phil Bridger
388:Phil Bridger
346:
295:|Companies}}
281:
280:
267:
266:
254:
253:
241:
240:
228:
227:
215:
214:
202:
201:
164:
124:
68:WikiProjects
35:
343:Notability?
496:Categories
58:Stub-class
140:Companies
131:companies
87:Companies
297:template
256:Maintain
230:Copyedit
28:deletion
480:Bardcom
457:Bardcom
424:Bardcom
369:Bardcom
354:Bardcom
311:Answer
243:Infobox
167:on the
384:WP:AFD
350:Logica
293:portal
217:Assess
64:scale.
282:Other
269:Stubs
484:talk
476:SMPP
461:talk
428:talk
410:talk
392:talk
373:talk
358:talk
34:was
159:Low
498::
486:)
463:)
430:)
412:)
394:)
386:.
375:)
360:)
306:}}
302:{{
291:{{
482:(
459:(
426:(
408:(
390:(
371:(
356:(
284::
272::
259::
246::
233::
220::
207::
171:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
