Talk:Aleksandr Dugin

2909:

Additionally, Dugin has articles from the 1990s that clearly identify with fascism. However, Dugin has also made a number of statements explicitly condemning fascism, national socialism, and racism as ideologies originating in Western Modernity. I have cited these in my changes: the citations include, among printed articles, video interviews of Dugin. Such statements condemning fascism are not simply a rhetorical trick by Dugin, but are essential for understanding Dugin's philosophical worldview and his purported "Fourth Political Position." Additionally, the original article confusingly describes Dugin as a fascist and supporting Nazism before quoting Dugin's condemnation of "absolute Evil, embodied in Western civilisation, its liberal-totalitarian hegemony and in Ukrainian Nazism." This is unclear, as it indicates that Dugin identifies with fascism before quoting his condemnation of fascism. Dugin's rejection of fascism is a core part of his work, and the omission of this is the omission of information about Dugin as a thinker.

1435:

classification entirely from the first paragraph, and maybe put it in a "disputed" opinions section. Because he being this or that without a deeper analysis and understanding of what he's really said, is what it is: just an opinion based on what is very likely propaganda which needs to build a certain imagine for its own purposes - and you all become just a blind (or accomplice) tool. Real encyclopediae suffer very much less because of this problem. Knowledge about current living characters in a challenged propaganda-filled world (more so starting from between 2004 and 2008)... well, really disappointing. Smart and honest contributors should leave, or avoid this kind of the-only-sources-I-can-know-say-so political labels, keep just facts and leave disputed opinions at the bottom.

1978: 1086:

one of his main books is, so against the left, right and third position (fascists included in the latter.) His main theory is a world order outside of the United states paradigm and neo soviet expansionist Eurasian ruling policy, where he states that the Eurasian peoples should be combined into one big multi cultural mix. He has also very clearly condemned both fascism and racism multiple times. Just because some one is authoritarian doesn't make them a fascist. It really isn't very convincing that a fascist should be a huge proponent of multiculturalism.

3017:

neo-fascist." But Dugin has on many occasions not only condemned fascism, but provided a theoretical basis for why he is opposed to fascism and why he thinks it is an expression of the same modernity that gives rise to liberalism. How, in that case, is removing the citations that merely include Dugin's stated views against fascism not "cherry-picking"? Aren't you, by definition, selecting which statements of his you want to include and which you do not, presumably because you have already decided what Dugin is before editing?

618: 450: 331: 2994:"Far-right" is an incredibly vague judgement of someone's views. This is not how Dugin describes himself, nor is it how Dugin can be described in any scholarly fashion. "Far-right" does not, for instance, capture Dugin's affinity for Stalinism, Russian's narodnist socialism, or his criticisms of fascism and nationalism. "Eurasianist" is an incredibly accurate term that is accepted by scholarly sources, by popular sources, and by Dugin himself. 804: 1301:

opinion piece, 10 describes him as a "radical rightwing politician" and says "Dugin can in certain ways be considered a neo-fascist as well as a geopolitician. " 9 describes him as "Russian political thinker and, by his own words, geopolitician,", and 8 is an interview in Polish which doesn't seem to either call him a Fascist, or feature him calling himself a Fascist. Here is a BBC article from today which doesn't mention fascist -

667: 646: 509: 478: 598: 677: 755: 1955:

view in a concrete manner. This allows to actually read the context and see whether the scholars consider that he is so much known for his fascist views that it deserves to be mentioned as the first sentence in the lead. Of course, and perhaps this is what L'Origine du monde has in mind, we must also consider what other scholars have said and make sure that due weight is respected. In particular, what

388: 364: 2653: 207: 237: 519: 873: 322: 2304:. Until today, I was not familiar with Dugin or Laruelle, although I was aware of National Bolshevism and fascism claims against Putin. But that's what I do if I what to know more about a subject, look for a source that is accurate, relatively unbiased and recognized as such by other experts, rather than newspaper opinion pieces or the analysis of news reporters. 2023: 1875: 902: 2003: 1362:

that do from, for example, an article interviewing a columnist entitled "Russian intellectual Aleksandr Dugin is also commonly known as 'Putin's brain'" doesn't mean that the claim should be in the first section of the article. More to the point, if you read the article as it is currently written, "far right" is a far more accurate description.

2698: 398: 2784:

Biden is worse on Ukraine. It’s clear he now just thinks the USA is the enemy regardless of who wins. It’s really weird how half the time this dude sounds indistinguishable from a “decolonial” campus leftist as far as geopolitics is concerned, but then whenever LGBT or women’s rights come up, he suddenly morphs into a

2080:

would be admissible. Of course, the fact that the journals are Russian, etc. should be part of the attribution so that the readers can make their own opinion. The general point here is that the POVs on Dugin might not be unifonorm among scholars. There might not be a single POV that represents mainstream scholarship.

1840:, who is an expert on fascism: "But few who have described Trump as a fascist can be called real experts in the field, not even Snyder. The majority of genuine specialists, including the historians Roger Griffin, Matthew Feldman, Stanley Payne and Ruth Ben-Ghiat, agree that whatever else he is, Trump is not a fascist." 1033:"Liking totalitarianism" doesn't equal fascist, and his position as a founding member of the National Bolshevik party definitely makes a pretty strong case against your assertion of his fascism. What exactly convinces you he is a fascist as opposed to a Bolshevist or Stalinist like his resume would make one presume? 1874:

extensive peer-reviewed work that Snyder has done on the Holocaust), it is especially noteworthy that Marlène Laruelle, whom you correctly cite as a critic of Snyder and others who see the Putin regime as fascist, does in fact readily describe Aleksandr Dugin as holding fascist views –– per the source I cited below

2101:, articles by non-experts are not reliable sources for the conclusions they reach. While they are reliable sources for the opinions of their writers, they lack weight for inclusion in this article unless cited in secondary sources. Furthermore, as a BLP, poorly sourced material should be immediately removed. 2307:

Having said that, news analysis, opinion pieces and popularized non-fiction play an important role in introducing people to topics and stimulating debate. When I was a teenager, I read H.G. Wells' world history, the Durants' world history series and Shirer's book on the Third Reich. And although they

2222:

2) I'm not convinced that the academic consensus here is strong enough for "Dugin's views are fascist" but I think I've made it clear –– even with the very incomplete sampling of some of the literature I presented above –– that we can establish using only peer-reviewed academic sources that his views

1716:

Thank you. I am not an expert at this. I can clearly see that most articles about him do not start, as this article does, by stating that he has Fascist views. The Guardian article from today doesn't explicitly say that his views are fascist, but that a doctine he developed is Fascist. I clearly gave

3016:

It shouldn't have to be pointed out, but I will also mention that this accusation of "cherry-picking" is doubly ironic given that the sections regarding Dugin as a fascist are defitionally cherry-picked. The Knowledge article states that Dugin's "political views have been characterized as fascist or

2737:

as a (possibly former) ally of Dugin. Does Dugin openly take one side in the conflict, or is he pursuing a more nebulous “both extremes against the middle” strategy (i.e., currying favor both with Palestinians who oppose Western support of Israel, as well as with ultra-Zionists who hate the West for

2272:

Of course other writers can and do question their definition or what should be included, but I don't expect that we should provide as much weight to their views unless they publish academic papers and gain acceptance from other experts. I really do think there is more rigor in a paper published in a

2140:

Perhaps you only meant to say that the article should rely on academic sources, because you feel that it should not be about opinions given in news media. I agree that some subjects are best covered by academic sources, but I don't think there is a general rule to decide when that is the case. It is

1392:

I understand that you think I am wrong, although I do not understand what you meant by simply naming wiki policies. What I would like you to do is explain why fascist should be in the first line in the RFC I started below. I understand that you think you have explained this before, but my request is

1321:

have you been looking at sources to see how they describe him, or searching for sources that describe him as a Fascist? Even if it were very common for reliable sources to describe him as "Fascist", which I dispute, I think it would need to be nearly universal to include the description in the first

1018:

He's absolutely not, he's right wing. He likes the totalitarian aspects of Stalin and the Soviet Union and how big the empire was. It's true that he was one of the founder members of the National Bolshevik party, which is pretty left wing. This confused me too for a while, because everything he says

2901:

Additionally, Dugin holds to views which are explicitly far-left. This includes (1) support for "a socialism for the Russians," (2) anti-colonialism, (3) support for Stalin and the USSR. This complicates his status as a "far-right" philosopher, which I believe is an ideological designation of Dugin

2160:

There is academic consensus on many things, and these can be treated as facts in articles. There are of course cases where there is academic debate, in which case articles say something like "most experts consider/do not consider Dugin to be fascist." I am not saying we should only rely on academic

1821:

TFD, you and I have disagreed about this in the past. Snyder is indeed an expert on fascism in the Eastern European context. Dismissive comments about the scholarly influence of someone who holds a named chair at Yale only serve to undercut your credibility. In any case, I'm not interested in going

1735:

articles for anlysis of political ideology, because they have no expertise in that area and policy says that their analysis is not a reliable source for facts unless written by an expert rather than someone with a BA in PoliSci. The main scholars of fascism treat it as an historical phenomenon that

1361:

Please check my comments against the current sources, as they mostly still apply. None of the sources given characterise him or his views as Fascist in the first line. Most of the sources given are obscure. Few, if any, of the sources describe his views as solely Fascist, and cherrypicking sections

1300:

eight discussions are not countless, and I would dispute that they are many. Having read them, I see no clear consensus or conclusion. Only one is about the first sentence. Of the 7 references given in the first sentence, number 12, 13 doesn't mention fascist at all, 11 mentions it once, but is an

1085:

Please have a good look at what Dugin actually has to say and what the far right thinks about him. The vast majority of the present days fascists/ ultra far right despise Dugin and Dugin despises them. Dugins political theory circles around his idea of 'the fourth political theory' as the title of

2997:

I should also mention I could ask any of you the same thing about "cherrypicking" or using bad sources. How is a WaPo article by "Tara Isabella Burton," which is your source for Dugin as a "far-right" thinker, not "cherrypicked"? Your citation for "far-right," at the very beginning of the article,

2598:

I tried doing this the other day, someone reverted it. I would just point out there is essentially a disambigation page for "Dugin", although it presents itself as a page about last name itself. The point here is that I´m sure the vast majority of people who are searching for "Dugin" are searching

2025:

There is some salutary nuance to her argument, but on the whole she comes down on the side of historians who see substantive continuity between Dugin’s thought and historical fascism. I’m going to leave off for now because I have other things to do. More will be forthcoming if there is any serious

1873:

One might not expect it, judging from the tone, but this is actually a productive exchange. Leaving aside the question of who counts as a fascism expert (I won't rehash our previous argument, or the context of Evans' sour grapes –– interested parties can search the Fascism talk page –– or list the

2912:

I believe my edit, which preserves the allegations of fascism while also including Dugin's statements to the contrary, are accurate and inclusive of the perspectives and judgements of others. I believe the mass reversal of edits I have made without any indication about why these are inaccurate is

2908:

The second substantial edit I made concerns the allegations of Dugin as a fascist. The original article states that Dugin's views "have been characterized as fascist or neo-fascist." I do not want to dispute this, as there are publications (cited in the Wiki article) that accuse Dugin of fascism.

1954:

Actually, this is the correct approach. Googling and counting results does not mean much. Perhaps some of them mentioned fascist to discuss the concept without actually saying he was a fascist. Taking good scholars that express a view is a good approach to verify a view and properly attribute the

1846:

Being an expert in a field means that you have submited your research and conclusions to academic publication, which Snyder has not done. And please read the commentary by Laruelle, who is Director of the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at George Washington University, and an

2783:

Jews and/or Israelis, as long as they align themselves with Russia, Iran, or another anti-Western power instead. That would explain his contacts with Eskin et al. He also seems to be distancing himself from the 2024 election, since he thinks Trump is worse when it comes to the Middle East, while

2238:

editing. But whatever. You do you. Ignoring all the other references I've presented –– including one of your own favored sources, Marlène Laruelle –– is not going to be a persuasive strategy however. As I stated above, when two scholars such as Snyder and Laruelle, who disagree vociferously on a

2079:

This is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is whether Snyder is published in a journal that reliably represents a scientific body (if we decide to restrict the article to that kind of sources). For example, if scholars (not only one) presented a POV in well known Russian journals, this POV

2040:

I didn't say that Snyder's views were not representative of "other" fascism scholars, I said he is not a fascism scholar. Furthermore, whether or not is views on Dugin are shared by experts is a red herring. I might agree with fascism experts that Mussolini was a fascist. That doesn't make me an

2621:

to this article. Do you perhaps think you are doing so by adding the hatnote? You would need to actually change the redirect target at Dugin to Aleksandr Dugin. If you don't do so, the hatnote is incorrect. Note that I am not suggesting that you do so, as such a move would be controversial (for

1910:

Fascism after all is a threat that must be destroyed at all costs. So we see the term used more liberally in polemical writing than in academic literature, so it comes to mean any anti-democrat who isn't a communist. But that robs us of a unique term to describe the inter-war regimes of central

1778:

and Aleksandr Prokhanov, were given time in mass media. And Mr. Putin himself has drawn on the work of the interwar Russian fascist Ivan Ilyin. For the president, a “fascist” or a “Nazi” is simply someone who opposes him or his plan to destroy Ukraine. Ukrainians are “Nazis” because they do not

2328:

This is a lengthy discussion with several different warring ideas, but to a general Wiki-layman such as myself I think it'd be best to change the formatting of the phrase to something in passive voice (uncertain if this is a huge faux pas), such as "generally considered to be a fascist", as it

2729:

What exactly is his stance on the Israel-Palestine issue? One of the photographs in the article shows Dugin in Iran, alongside a rabbi who is known for being outspokenly anti-Zionist, and with a Palestinian flag in the background. I’m guessing the photo is from a pro-Palestine demonstration.

1894:

a list of Snyder's scholarly writings from his website. Not all of the works were published by the academic press or peer-reviewed. I don't know if you could say he has extensive peer reviewed work on the Holocaust, but being a Holocaust expert does not make one an expert on fascism or vice

1613:

Of course, raw search results like this come with many flaws, but less so with a Scholar search than a normal Google search. Assuming we want to say something about Dugin's views (which are a focus of RS coverage), "fascist" seems like a prime contender, being about as common as his being a

1434:

Let's do a better cherry-picking. You could learn languages other than English (or just use automatic translators), so you have a wider pool of sources you can cherry-pick from to describe Dugin as he needs to be described, just to make clear who's who. Or, you can drop this opinionated

1635:

I thought we should prefer general sources such as the Guardian to obscure scholarly sources. Your research suggests that less than half the scholarly articles about him mention in any context the highly emotive and subjective term Fascist, so why should it be in the first sentence?

1471:

please stop re-formatting my comments. Please can you make your argument, rather than describing its virtues. Why is "Fascist" more salient than "far right", if either is necessary? Google gives 22,100 results for ""Aleksandr Dugin" facist" and 517,000 results for "Aleksandr Dugin"

335: 2407:

in that case I don't understand why derivative words of "traditionalism" and "neo-Eurasianism" aren't worthwhile. We have established, I think, that less than half the articles which mention Dugin mention any form of Fascist word in any context, and that less than 27% call him a

1649:

There's a reasonable argument to be had over whether a descriptor found (perhaps) in half of the best available sources can be labeled "widely characterized". By my reading of policy, it can. I think it's sensible to argue otherwise. I'm interested to see how other editors feel.

1243:

I have checked and this has not been discussed many times before. Please explain your edit in the context of this discussion. Describing a political philosopher whose views are, according to the article, complex, as " widely characterized as fascist" in the first sentence is

2742:)? The latter would seem to match the way he has tried to influence European politics (courting the far-right and far-left simultaneously). There is probably a lot more written about Dugin in the Russian language than in English, so it’d be worth checking those sources too. 1801:

It trivializes fascism to call every foreign leader who has disputes with the West a fascist. Where are the colored shirts, the Putin youth, the concentration camps, the extra-legal courts, the omnipresent party, the murders of thousands of political opponents, the leader's

1739:

Dugin developed a "Fourth Political Theory" as an alternative to liberalism, communism and fascism, disowning all three of them. But that does not mean he is not fascist or neo-fascist, that is something for which we require expert opinion that says what the consensus view

2055:

If you're not arguing that Snyder's take on Dugin is in some way fringe, what is your point? I'm highly dubious that the community at large would agree with you that Snyder isn't an expert on this topic –– he is, rather, the kind of gold-standard source we look to per

1668:""Aleksandr dugin" neo eurasianism " gets 1570 hits, which is almost as many, and much more specific in meaning. Traditionalism gets 2140 hits, "nationalist" 2,000 results. For some reason "ultra nationalist" has been added to the sentence. That gets only 393 hits. 2990:

The fact that you have failed to even address a single point makes your political biases in this very clear. You have even titled this "Whitewashing to remove 'far-right,'" showing that you already decided Dugin is a priori "far-right" before looking at any

2385:

All of the derivative words of "fascist" are potential worthwhile hits: fascism, fascistic, etc. That's what distinguishes it from "traditionalism" and "neo-Eurasianism". Again, all of these suffer from the usual ills of evidence based on search results.

2757:

I found something at least, written in response to the current Israel-Gaza war, but it’s a primary source (an essay Dugin himself wrote which was then published in an Arab news outlet). At least it’s more current than a lot of the other sources in this

1902:

I do not doubt that Dugin is heavily influenced by fascism, praises fascism and has views similar to their's. That should all be in the article. But iz think we should avoid calling someone a fascist when that is a minority opinion at best in reliable

1797:

Snyder is not a fascism scholar and has little influence as an historian other than to popularize unconventional views for a wide audience. Your link is to an opinion piece, not an academic paper. If it were, then we could see what if any reception it

2367:

I suddenly thought to do to your google scholar search what you did to mine. "Alexander Dugin" "fascist" gives only 920 results, as opposed to 3.390 for "Alexander Dugin". Does that mean that 73% of articles that mention Alexander Dugin don't mention

1107:

Instead of removing his claims of being a fascist or saying he’s a fascist label it as “characterized as fascist”, this should be a good equalizer between people on this talk as he never called himself a fascist but people still consider him one

1414:. Being "known for views widely characterized as fascist" is by far one of the most salient things reliable sources say about this person. Also: learn how to properly indent your comments. I am tired of reformatting every time I respond to you. 1571:

Dugin is someone discussed by high-quality scholarly sources, so I'd prefer to know if they commonly use the descriptor. I searched Google Scholar using "Alexander Dugin", since that spelling is most common in English language sources. I get:

995:

He is a communist not a fascist. He even said himself he is on the side of Stalin and the Soviet Union. I understand that everything your average american disagrees with is "fascist", but this guy is a communist (which is not any better).

1898:

Laruelle begins the section "FASCISM, CONSERVATIVE REVOLUTION AND NATIONAL BOLSHEVISM" by saying, "The connections between Dugin’s ideas and fascism have been a subject of much debate." She then attempts to explain what the connection

2510:

Wanting the destruction of another empire isn't non-fascist as fascism is perfectly fine with competing empires collapsing. In fact it is based on the idea that your empire is best so clearly all others who might oppose you SHOULD

2253:

I think it is important to recognize that there are fascism experts who among other things have developed definitions of the subject that are widely accepted not just by them but among historians and social scientists generally. In

2223:

are "widely characterized" as such. That's a slightly lower bar and it is easily met in this case. I'm okay with including some newspaper sources too, or not. But that's really beside the point. The status quo language is both

1747:

pointed out in a source used for this article, "Contrary to the belief of those Western commentators who view him as "Putin's guru," Dugin has little direct access to the highest echelons of the presidential administration."

607: 488: 2898:. Eurasianism cannot accurately be called "far-right," as its adherents have included explicitly far-left and Communist elements, including the current Communist Party of the Russian Federation leader, Gennadi Zyuganov. 2483:

I would still like to know the best term for someone advocating the destruction of any large empire. (As opposed to simply waiting for it to self-destruct, whose inevitability would appear to be supported by history.)

3096: 2951:

Point to the academic and scholarly sources I have provided that are not reliable. Please explain to me how opinion pieces which do not even have primary sources cited in them are reliable at characterizing someone.

2889: 2887: 2137:

It should be obvious to anyone that has studied any subject, that the people who write the texts that students are told to read in university courses are more reliable and closer to academic consensus than newspaper

1856:

1393:

not whether you can find sources that call his views Fascist, or that you claim this was agreed before, but that you actually explain why "known for views widely characterized as fascist." belongs in the first line.

153: 1526:

It calls his views "ultranationalist", "anti-liberal and ultranationalist", "radical anti-western thoughts", "illiberal totalitarian ideas" and "Russian nationalism". Those two mentions are not directly of his

627: 492: 3001:

I will point out that each of my sources, including those on the edits I made before they were swept away by the judgment of Langley, are not only from reputable sources, but contain primary source material.

1717:

examples of 5 other formulations the Guardian explicitly used to describe his views. I would add that Fascist is not a useful contemporary description as it's meaning is very unclear and largely pejorative.

2480:

My mistake: I misread Dugin's name in the title as that of the author, who is actually James Heiser. Heiser quotes Dugin as saying "The American Empire should be destroyed. And at one point, it will be."

1343:

respectively. Note too that L'Origine du monde appears to be arguing against previous sources, rather than the updated ones. All seven of the present sources definitely identify Dugin's views as fascist.

2297:

and others, who all contributed substantially to their areas of expertise. And most editors thought that their academic writings were preferable to their articles and books written for the popular press.

2517:

Dugin appears to think "The American Empire should be destroyed" because he thinks America should be destroyed, not Empires. He'd likely be entirely fine with a Ruscic Empire on the American continent.

1736:

died in 1945 and refer to its current proponents as neo-fascists, which is type of subtle distinction usually seen lacking in news articles. It certainly shouldn't mean anyone who the U.S. doesn't like.

2269:

He and other experts have then tried to determine which ideologies and movements fall within this so-called "consensus theory of fascism," which again determine how the subject is taught in schools.

2766:, but it’s clear from his own writing that Dugin only opposes Israel insofar as it currently acts as an outpost of what he calls the “antichrist” Western civilization. (He even singles out Israeli 1034: 3131: 2681: 2300:

I mentioned Laruelle because she is perhaps the leading expert on Dugin. In fact rather than Google search and cherry-pick, I looked for the most relevant book on the subject and first came upon

2180:

requires us to explain how accepted his opinion on Dugin is, which should be sourced to secondary sources. We could say for example that Snyder has popularized the view of Dugin as a fascist.

3091: 1188: 1093: 1051: 1973:

TFD simply asserted that Snyder is not representative of other scholars. I assert that TFD is incorrect. Sorting this out would require a bit of exposition. First of all, we currently have

2010:, has risen from a fringe ideologueto deeply penetrate into Russian governmental offices, mass media, civil society and academia in ways that many in the West do not realize or understand. 2141:

something that editors must decide among themselves. I feel too that this subject would be best covered by academic sources, but I disagree with the idea that there is such a thing as an

1275:

Update: I've substituted out some of the weaker sources for stronger ones, and added quotes. There is no doubt that "fascist" is a very common way for RS to describe this person's views.

3126: 1204:

In line with discussion here I have changed "fascist" to "far right" in the lede. Looking at the rest of the article it seems to me that there is an over emphasis on claims of Fascism.

3141: 2890:

https://www.academia.edu/9504317/Alexander_Dugins_Neo_Eurasianism_and_the_Eurasian_Union_Project_A_Critique_of_Recent_Scholarship_and_an_Attempt_at_a_New_Beginning_and_Reorientation

2779:

Nevertheless, since his overall agenda is primarily anti-modern-West, rather than specifically anti-Israel or anti-Jewish, he does leave open the possibility of collaborating with

1239:

I have checked, and this has not been discussed countless times before. Please provide examples of sources that state that he is "knowm for views widely characterized as fascist".

2426: 1689:, both of which need quote marks to avoid unwanted results. Neo eurasianism will return hits for just "Eurasian", and traditionalism finds results including just "traditional". 2422: 459: 374: 3136: 3076: 301: 1261:. I count at least eight discussions. And I count seven sources backing the "fascist" label. Even if you want to quibble about one or two of them, that is more than enough. 2350:

There are currently 35 mentions of Fascist or Fascism in the article, and 12 mentions of Communist or Communism. A priori this seems an excessive use of Fascist/Fascism.

198: 1877:. When academics who disagree quite vociferously on a number of related matters can agree on this, that's pretty strong evidence that Dugin is "widely seen" in this way. 147: 3101: 2429:. I wouldn't say that Google tests like this "establish" much in this case, but they can help focus our attention on areas where a rigorous source review is worthwhile. 766: 2808:

Why wasn’t it mentioned that the car bombing that killed Dugins daughter, was carried out by Ukraine(particularly the Ukrainian SBU)? Proved by American intelligence

2267: 2770:’s transhumanist views as an example of what he’s fighting against!) That, and his references to “spiders” controlling everything behind the scenes, comes across as 3121: 1486:

Here is a description of him from today from the Guardian. It doesn't call his views Fascist - Alexander Dugin: who is Putin ally and apparent car bombing target?

3166: 886: 1375:

I mean, at this point it should be clear that I think you're wildly off base here. Let's allow others to weigh in. No need to ping me every time you comment.

3051: 306: 3066: 289:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1682: 79: 1686: 3156: 3081: 3061: 2633: 2438: 2395: 1698: 1659: 1623: 1517: 733: 723: 1606: 2905:

This is all to argue that the introduction to Dugin as a "far-right philosopher" is, in addition to being inaccurate and misleading, unsubstantive.

1588: 3116: 3106: 3071: 2532:

If the consensus is that "fascist" is a suitable category for someone proposing destruction of some competing empire, I have no quarrel with that.

588: 578: 416: 281: 44: 1507:"Dugin co-founded the National Bolshevik party with the novelist Eduard Limonov, merging fascist and communist-nostalgic rhetoric and symbolism." 2507:

When we look at his ultranationalist ideas, propensity to violent rhetoric, and the idea of an exoansionist state, he fits the bill for fascism.

1019:

is right wing. While it's absolutely true that he was a member- he pulled it right. It went very far left as soon as he was no longer a member.

3161: 1600: 2165:

for example says that newspaper columns (which is where Snyder published his views), even if published in reputable news sources such as the

85: 2116:

I am unsure what you mean about experts. I thought Knowledge was based on concensus as represented in reliable sources, such as newspapers.

3146: 2416: 1676: 1644: 1594: 1582: 1535: 997: 420: 2380: 1779:

accept that they are Russians and resist. A time traveler from the 1930s would have no difficulty identifying the Putin regime as fascist.

1496: 3086: 2880:"Far-right" does not describe Dugin in any way. I suggest "Eurasianist" to describe Dugin, as Dugin (1) is a self-described Eurasianist, 2850:

this is the place to make your case. Knowledge avoids self-aggrandizing, PR-speak, and other euphemistic language. We are interested in

2809: 1436: 1069: 699: 1401: 1370: 1330: 1313: 1252: 1038: 3151: 2685: 2514:

When someone criticizes an empire, we should be careful to examine whether they are criticizing the nature or substance of the empire.

1503:"he continued writing and lecturing, further developing the concept of Eurasianism, the Russian-flavoured, fascist political doctrine" 1050:

Ok, how? That’s a very big and complicated claim you’re making without providing details on what makes him “right-wing” in your mind.

424: 2763: 1959:

wrote suggests that Snyder is not representative of other scholars. Still, the idea is to look what specific scholars have written.

1192: 1097: 1055: 554: 2930:

Your conclusions about how to categorize this guy are not relevant here. Only how reliable sources categorize him is relevant. See

1576: 415:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1805:

Stalinists defined fascism as authoritarian capitalism, but while many may use that definition, it's not generally accepted today.

3111: 257: 2998:

comes from "WaPo Outlook," which is a section in the Newspaper for opinion pieces. "Tara Isabella Burton" is not a Dugin expert.

3056: 411: 369: 244: 99: 30: 2358: 2124: 1948: 1725: 1480: 1212: 1156: 168: 1540:

You were JUST given direct quotes which contradict your claim and then you shamelessly repeat the false claim again. This is

1258: 825: 820: 690: 651: 253: 194: 190: 104: 20: 2195:

Dugin is often described as a fascist in news reporting, although that view has little support among actual fascism experts.

135: 2680:

In the very beginning of the Alexandr Dugin article it states “Dugin was”. Dugin is not dead. Please change to “Dugin is”.

1940:

I don't understand you. We established there are 20,000 articles about this guy. How does "an academic counterpoint" help?

2629: 2434: 2391: 1774:

In the Russia of the 21st century, “anti-fascism” simply became the right of a Russian leader to define national enemies.

1694: 1655: 1619: 1513: 970: 74: 1848: 785: 762: 550: 532: 483: 344: 1847:

expert (i.e., published in academic papers and books), about the rise of populism in Europe. She actually had her book

1148:

The sources do not clearly describe him as a Fascist, and it should not be one of the the first sentences in the lede.

2455: 858: 65: 1841: 781: 206: 185: 2098: 1995:

cited in the article where we say that Dugin's views are widely characterized as fascist. To this could be added

2828: 2315: 2266:'s "now classic definition of generic fascism": "an ideology of 'palingenetic populist right ultra-nationalism.'" 2244: 2204: 2106: 2065: 2046: 2031: 1918: 1882: 1864: 1827: 1812: 1788: 1759: 1419: 1380: 1349: 1280: 1266: 1223: 129: 2060:–– but in any case it seems perhaps we can leave that argument aside if it isn't germane to the present debate. 837: 217: 2625: 2535:

But while much more could be said in that vein, e.g. in the Middle East, a talk page is not the place for it.

2430: 2410: 2404: 2387: 2374: 2364: 2352: 2150: 2118: 2085: 1981: 1964: 1942: 1781: 1719: 1690: 1670: 1651: 1638: 1632: 1615: 1545: 1529: 1509: 1490: 1474: 1395: 1364: 1324: 1307: 1246: 1206: 1150: 265: 1001: 2895: 2893: 2813: 2465:, would it be reasonable to call that author a fascist, or would Knowledge suggest a more appropriate term? 1993: 1440: 1073: 3022: 3007: 2957: 2918: 2793: 2747: 2659: 2575: 2540: 2489: 2470: 927: 879: 290: 125: 109: 2173:

reliable for facts. An exception might be if it is written by an expert, but Snyder isn't a fascism expert.

2558: 2523: 1987: 773: 784:

may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the

3018: 3003: 2953: 2942: 2914: 2845: 2713: 2604: 2442: 2399: 2330: 2110: 1968: 1843:

And if his opinions had weight, then they would mentioned in textbooks about fascism, which they aren't.

1763: 1702: 1663: 1627: 1560: 1521: 1423: 1384: 1353: 1284: 1270: 1227: 1218:

As Volunteer Marek has stated, this has been discussed many times before and we go by what sources say.

1174: 1024: 986: 537: 350: 2984:

How is the citation of "Is Aleksandr Dugin a Traditionalist? "Neo-Eurasianism" and Perennial Philosophy

2234:

3) TFD, constantly repeating the claim that Snyder is not a "fascism expert" is beginning to feel like

175: 2421:"Traditional", "tradition", "Eurasia", and "Eurasian" are unwanted results. If you add you get up to 765:

procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been

260:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 2824: 2554: 2519: 2311: 2240: 2200: 2131: 2102: 2061: 2042: 2027: 1956: 1914: 1878: 1860: 1823: 1808: 1784: 1755: 1551: 1468: 1415: 1389: 1376: 1358: 1345: 1318: 1297: 1276: 1262: 1240: 1236: 1219: 1165: 1133: 1119: 1089: 958: 300:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 321: 2146: 2081: 2013: 1960: 1772:, who calls explicitly for both Dugin and the Putin state to be referred to explicitly as fascist: 1744: 1113: 935: 777: 617: 161: 55: 2239:

number of closely related topics, can agree on this, that's a sign that it's the mainstream view.

962: 698:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2975: 2867: 2789: 2743: 2571: 2550: 2536: 2499: 2485: 2466: 2338: 2000: 843: 304:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 222: 70: 449: 1984: 2767: 2290: 2162: 1974: 1822:

back and forth with you on that. If others would like to weigh in I will be happy to respond.

1769: 1541: 966: 934:

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |

51: 141: 2938: 2709: 2600: 2329:

doesn't sound so definite but still carries weight. Especially compared to open Nazis like

2286: 2259: 2216: 2177: 1837: 1020: 982: 914: 839: 803: 403: 219: 2987:

Anton Shekhovtsov and Andreas Umland" a cherrypicked citation or a non-independent source?

2859: 2235: 1836:

I did not say he is not an expert, just that he is not an expert on fascism. I will quote

682: 297: 261: 249: 24: 955:

Remove the propaganda claim that Dugin is a fascist. What kind of references are there?

1996: 1990: 1109: 676: 666: 645: 3045: 2971: 2863: 2734: 2334: 2263: 2228: 1411: 1336: 524: 2474: 2154: 1123: 1101: 974: 754: 2967: 2931: 2855: 2851: 2567:

Which of the two paragraphs in my 22 April reply constituted "talking past people"?

2308:

were better written than any of my textbooks, they were not as reliable or neutral.

2294: 2282: 2278: 2057: 1891: 2622:

example, I would be likely to oppose it) and should only proceed via RM consensus.

508: 477: 2277:. In fact the discussion has come up with various public intellectuals including 2215:

1) I agree with TFD that academic consensus is a real thing. Obviously. Per e.g.

1335:

Both of the above comments show a profound misunderstanding of Knowledge policy:

1302: 2553:

If you're just going to talk passed people, what are we hoping to achieve here?

2224: 1407: 1340: 597: 2504:

Just because he wants a particular empire to fall doesn't make him non-fascist.

2145:: even in the academic world, there might exist various opinions on a subject. 387: 363: 950: 672: 514: 393: 2302:

Key Thinkers of the Radical Right: Behind the New Threat to Liberal Democracy

1750:

Key Thinkers of the Radical Right: Behind the New Threat to Liberal Democracy

1130:

This has been discussed countless times before and we go by what sources say.

2183:

I think it is very important to distinguish the possible things we can say:

878:

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the

2966:

We're not interested in cherry-picking. Our goal is to summarize reliable,

841: 221: 2896:

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-03-31/putins-brain

1068:

Just because western propaganda says he's fascist, it doesn't mean he is.

695: 3026: 3011: 2979: 2961: 2946: 2922: 2883: 2881: 2871: 2832: 2817: 2797: 2751: 2718: 2689: 2637: 2608: 2579: 2562: 2544: 2527: 2493: 2342: 2319: 2248: 2208: 2089: 2069: 2050: 2035: 1922: 1886: 1868: 1831: 1816: 1792: 1444: 1196: 1142: 1077: 1059: 1042: 1028: 1005: 990: 2785: 2369: 2176:

If on the other hand we treat Snyder's conclusions as an opinion, then

2008:

Aleksandr Dugin, a prominent advocate of fascist and anti-Western views

922:

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

2970:, not one editor's personal selection of quotes taken out of context. 2570:

And how is "I have no quarrel with that" trying to achieve anything?

2026:

question as to whether these views represent mainstream scholarship.

1406:

Stop pinging me. My argument is that the description is clearly both

541: 1999:, a rather more prominent scholar than the previous three (see e.g. 549:

Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the

2021:, and does not denounce Nazism, even though he condemns its racism. 423:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 2618: 2372:? If so, would you agree that this article uses Fascist too much? 1906:

I think the attempt to label people fascist is often used as an

2823:

Because no one has yet provided reliable sources saying this.

2647: 2614:

I'm copying, with some tweaks, a comment from your talk page:

896: 867: 844: 797: 749: 315: 296:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

273: 231: 223: 15: 3097:

Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles

926:] The anchor (#Post-Soviet recovery and problems) has been 616: 596: 448: 2161:

sources, but that we should follow policy and guidelines.

772:

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the

1743:

We might also wish to re-vist the Putin's brain meme. As

2937:

RS call him Eurasianist, and they call him far-right. --

2016:, whom TFD cites approvingly above, takes the view that 2886:(2) is regarded as a Eurasianist by scholarly sources, 2019:

Dugin therefore advances a positive reading of fascism

981:

Just because he says he isn't, doesn't mean he isn't.

160: 2258:(OUP 2017), which is a textbook, the fascism scholar 2927:

You misunderstand the basic principles of Knowledge.

2902:

that describes only a caricature of Dugin's thought.

2892:(3) is regarded as a Eurasianist by popular sources. 2219:

we avoid stating facts as though they were opinions.

1768:

An academic counterpoint to this would be historian

694:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3132:

Science and education in Russia task force articles

2788:. But that’s not exactly new knowledge about him. 3092:C-Class biography (science and academia) articles 1187:…oh I see…no secrets on how this game is played. 2733:However, the article also mentions arch-Zionist 1776:Actual Russian fascists, such as Aleksandr Dugin 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3127:C-Class Russia (science and education) articles 2913:extremely suspect and ideologically motivated. 2644:Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2024 3142:Politics and law of Russia task force articles 2617:You have never, and still haven't, redirected 2189:Dugin is generally considered to be a fascist. 1303:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62621509 608:the science and education in Russia task force 2854:, not cherry-picked interviews in support of 2615: 1305:I have opened an RFC further down the page. 852:This page has archives. Sections older than 174: 8: 2192:Some experts consider Dugin to be a fascist. 951:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSsIrcUS8JM 3137:C-Class Russia (politics and law) articles 3077:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in People 2594:WP searches for Dugin should redirect here 1853:published by the Cornell University Press. 1117: 1087: 956: 640: 472: 358: 628:the politics and law of Russia task force 3102:Science and academia work group articles 2456:The American Empire should be destroyed 1035:2600:6C52:7E3F:E659:A039:29BA:7434:89A1 642: 474: 360: 319: 3122:Low-importance C-Class Russia articles 2682:2A02:AA7:4624:AED6:896B:E5D8:D9E9:CE9C 2463:The Russian Empire should be destroyed 2142: 2136: 2076: 2017: 2006: 1773: 1506: 1502: 862:when more than 4 sections are present. 2884:https://www.jstor.org/stable/20621114 7: 3167:Pages in the Knowledge Top 25 Report 2425:. Adding , that results increase to 1189:2A02:6B60:BD7B:0:C91B:DE4D:D8B2:1ADD 1094:2407:7000:9A61:C632:35E7:B:2986:7653 1052:2A02:6B60:BD7B:0:C91B:DE4D:D8B2:1ADD 688:This article is within the scope of 530:This article is within the scope of 409:This article is within the scope of 3052:Biography articles of living people 2454:May I suggest as a source the book 1179:“The sources claim he’s a fascist” 882:. The week in which this happened: 460:the science and academia work group 23:for discussing improvements to the 3067:Knowledge vital articles in People 2839:Whitewashing to remove "far-right" 2273:major journal and a column in the 14: 856:may be automatically archived by 3157:Low-importance politics articles 3082:C-Class vital articles in People 3062:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 2705:The article grammar is correct. 2696: 2651: 1501:It call his views fascist twice: 1257:Looks like you have not checked 1162:Yes they do. Check the archives. 900: 871: 802: 753: 675: 665: 644: 517: 507: 476: 396: 386: 362: 329: 320: 279:This article must adhere to the 235: 205: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2461:If someone wrote a book titled 2077:I assert that TFD is incorrect. 728:This article has been rated as 583:This article has been rated as 433:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 3117:Low-importance Russia articles 3107:WikiProject Biography articles 3072:C-Class level-5 vital articles 708:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 436:Template:WikiProject Biography 349:It is of interest to multiple 1: 3162:WikiProject Politics articles 2719:07:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC) 2690:07:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC) 1445:21:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC) 1078:21:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC) 786:contentious topics procedures 711:Template:WikiProject Politics 702:and see a list of open tasks. 625:This article is supported by 605:This article is supported by 457:This article is supported by 282:biographies of living persons 248:for general discussion about 42:Put new text under old text. 1731:Personally, I would not use 975:12:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 563:Knowledge:WikiProject Russia 421:contribute to the discussion 3147:WikiProject Russia articles 3027:07:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 3012:07:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 2980:07:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 2962:06:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 2947:06:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 2923:06:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 2872:06:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 2862:. Do not edit war further. 2674:to reactivate your request. 2662:has been answered. Set the 2443:13:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC) 2417:04:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC) 2400:01:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC) 2381:00:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC) 2359:12:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2343:04:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2333:, and especially in a BLP. 2320:04:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2249:02:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2209:02:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2155:01:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2125:00:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2111:23:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 2090:23:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 2070:00:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 2051:23:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 2036:23:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1969:22:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1949:22:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1923:20:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC) 1887:01:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 1869:00:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 1832:22:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1817:22:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1793:21:46, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1764:20:57, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1726:19:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1703:18:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1677:15:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1664:16:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1645:15:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1628:15:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1561:17:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1536:17:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1522:15:56, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1497:15:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1481:15:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1424:15:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1402:14:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1385:14:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1371:14:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1354:14:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1331:14:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1314:14:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1285:14:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1271:13:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1253:13:37, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1228:13:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1213:13:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1175:17:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1157:12:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1143:07:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1124:06:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1102:02:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 566:Template:WikiProject Russia 294:must be removed immediately 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3183: 3087:C-Class biography articles 2833:06:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 2818:03:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 2798:00:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC) 2752:23:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC) 2638:13:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC) 2563:00:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 2545:05:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC) 2528:13:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC) 2494:02:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 2475:00:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 1685:for "neo-eurasianism" and 1197:18:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC) 1060:18:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC) 1029:18:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 1006:11:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 734:project's importance scale 589:project's importance scale 3152:C-Class politics articles 2609:09:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 2580:03:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 2005:; quote from the latter: 1043:05:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 991:06:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC) 944: 788:before editing this page. 727: 660: 624: 604: 582: 540:dedicated to coverage of 502: 456: 381: 357: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2365:User:Firefangledfeathers 1687:440 for "traditionalism" 782:normal editorial process 3112:C-Class Russia articles 2099:User:L'Origine du monde 769:as a contentious topic. 553:, or contribute to the 489:Science & education 3057:C-Class vital articles 2738:not supporting Israel 2624: 2412:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 2376:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 2354:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 2120:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1944:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1908:argumentum ad hominem. 1721:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1672:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1640:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1531:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1492:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1476:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1397:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1366:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1326:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1309:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1248:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1208:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 1152:♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ 928:deleted by other users 859:Lowercase sigmabot III 778:standards of behaviour 621: 601: 453: 75:avoid personal attacks 2331:Francis Parker Yockey 945:Dugin isn't a fascist 887:August 21 to 27, 2022 620: 600: 452: 412:WikiProject Biography 336:level-5 vital article 199:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 2860:synthesis of sources 2764:He equivocates a lot 2458:by Aleksandr Dugin? 2256:Political Ideologies 1237:User:Volunteer Marek 774:purpose of Knowledge 691:WikiProject Politics 375:Science and Academia 252:. Any such comments 105:No original research 2968:independent sources 2852:independent sources 2626:Firefangledfeathers 2431:Firefangledfeathers 2405:Firefangledfeathers 2388:Firefangledfeathers 2186:Dugin is a fascist. 1691:Firefangledfeathers 1652:Firefangledfeathers 1633:Firefangledfeathers 1616:Firefangledfeathers 1510:Firefangledfeathers 2143:academic consensus 1850:Is Russia Fascist? 763:contentious topics 622: 602: 555:project discussion 533:WikiProject Russia 454: 439:biography articles 345:content assessment 247: 86:dispute resolution 47: 2856:original research 2768:Yuval Noah Harari 2678: 2677: 2599:for "Aleksandr". 2291:Michael Ignatieff 1975:Anton Shekhovtsov 1783:(emphasis added) 1579:for just the name 1559: 1546:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 1173: 1141: 1126: 1104: 1092:comment added by 1047:“He’s right wing” 977: 961:comment added by 942: 941: 917:in most browsers. 895: 894: 866: 865: 831: 830: 793: 792: 748: 747: 744: 743: 740: 739: 714:politics articles 639: 638: 635: 634: 471: 470: 467: 466: 314: 313: 272: 271: 243: 230: 229: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3174: 2849: 2725:Israel/Palestine 2717: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2669: 2665: 2655: 2654: 2648: 2413: 2377: 2355: 2287:Arthur C. Brooks 2260:Aristotle Kallis 2135: 2121: 2014:Marlène Laruelle 1945: 1838:Richard J. Evans 1745:Marlène Laruelle 1722: 1673: 1641: 1558: 1556: 1554:Volunteer Marek 1549: 1532: 1493: 1477: 1398: 1367: 1327: 1310: 1249: 1209: 1172: 1170: 1168:Volunteer Marek 1163: 1153: 1140: 1138: 1136:Volunteer Marek 1131: 936:Reporting errors 904: 903: 897: 875: 874: 868: 861: 845: 817: 816: 806: 798: 757: 750: 716: 715: 712: 709: 706: 685: 680: 679: 669: 662: 661: 656: 648: 641: 571: 570: 567: 564: 561: 527: 522: 521: 520: 511: 504: 503: 498: 495: 493:Politics and law 480: 473: 441: 440: 437: 434: 431: 417:join the project 406: 404:Biography portal 401: 400: 399: 390: 383: 382: 377: 366: 359: 342: 333: 332: 325: 324: 316: 302:this noticeboard 274: 239: 238: 232: 224: 210: 209: 200: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3042: 3041: 2843: 2841: 2825:Generalrelative 2806: 2727: 2706: 2697: 2695: 2667: 2663: 2652: 2646: 2596: 2411: 2375: 2353: 2241:Generalrelative 2132:The Four Deuces 2129: 2119: 2062:Generalrelative 2028:Generalrelative 2012:) Indeed, even 1943: 1879:Generalrelative 1824:Generalrelative 1785:Generalrelative 1720: 1671: 1639: 1614:"philosopher". 1612: 1552: 1550: 1530: 1491: 1475: 1469:Generalrelative 1416:Generalrelative 1396: 1390:Generalrelative 1377:Generalrelative 1365: 1359:Generalrelative 1346:Generalrelative 1325: 1319:Generalrelative 1308: 1298:Generalrelative 1277:Generalrelative 1263:Generalrelative 1247: 1241:Generalrelative 1220:Generalrelative 1207: 1182:checks sources* 1166: 1164: 1151: 1134: 1132: 947: 938: 920: 919: 918: 901: 891: 872: 857: 846: 840: 811: 776:, any expected 713: 710: 707: 704: 703: 683:Politics portal 681: 674: 654: 569:Russia articles 568: 565: 562: 559: 558: 547:To participate: 523: 518: 516: 496: 486: 438: 435: 432: 429: 428: 402: 397: 395: 372: 343:on Knowledge's 340: 330: 262:Aleksandr Dugin 250:Aleksandr Dugin 236: 226: 225: 220: 197: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 25:Aleksandr Dugin 12: 11: 5: 3180: 3178: 3170: 3169: 3164: 3159: 3154: 3149: 3144: 3139: 3134: 3129: 3124: 3119: 3114: 3109: 3104: 3099: 3094: 3089: 3084: 3079: 3074: 3069: 3064: 3059: 3054: 3044: 3043: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 2999: 2995: 2992: 2988: 2985: 2935: 2928: 2910: 2906: 2903: 2899: 2878: 2840: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2805: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2776: 2775: 2760: 2759: 2726: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2676: 2675: 2656: 2645: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2595: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2568: 2533: 2515: 2512: 2508: 2505: 2502: 2481: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2309: 2305: 2298: 2275:New York Times 2270: 2232: 2220: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2181: 2174: 2167:New York Times 2147:Dominic Mayers 2114: 2113: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2082:Dominic Mayers 2074: 2073: 2072: 1997:Andreas Umland 1991:John B. Dunlop 1961:Dominic Mayers 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1912: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1858: 1854: 1844: 1806: 1803: 1799: 1770:Timothy Snyder 1753: 1741: 1737: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1611: 1610: 1604: 1598: 1592: 1586: 1580: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1316: 1273: 1231: 1230: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1146: 1145: 1122:comment added 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1048: 1045: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 998:193.145.14.195 946: 943: 940: 939: 933: 932: 931: 915:case-sensitive 909: 908: 907: 905: 893: 892: 890: 889: 883: 876: 864: 863: 851: 848: 847: 842: 838: 836: 833: 832: 829: 828: 823: 813: 812: 807: 801: 795: 791: 790: 758: 746: 745: 742: 741: 738: 737: 730:Low-importance 726: 720: 719: 717: 700:the discussion 687: 686: 670: 658: 657: 655:Low‑importance 649: 637: 636: 633: 632: 623: 613: 612: 603: 593: 592: 585:Low-importance 581: 575: 574: 572: 545: 544:on Knowledge. 529: 528: 512: 500: 499: 497:Low‑importance 481: 469: 468: 465: 464: 455: 445: 444: 442: 408: 407: 391: 379: 378: 367: 355: 354: 348: 326: 312: 311: 307:this help page 291:poorly sourced 277: 270: 269: 266:Reference desk 254:may be removed 240: 228: 227: 218: 216: 215: 212: 211: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3179: 3168: 3165: 3163: 3160: 3158: 3155: 3153: 3150: 3148: 3145: 3143: 3140: 3138: 3135: 3133: 3130: 3128: 3125: 3123: 3120: 3118: 3115: 3113: 3110: 3108: 3105: 3103: 3100: 3098: 3095: 3093: 3090: 3088: 3085: 3083: 3080: 3078: 3075: 3073: 3070: 3068: 3065: 3063: 3060: 3058: 3055: 3053: 3050: 3049: 3047: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3019:Korrektor1917 3015: 3014: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3004:Korrektor1917 3000: 2996: 2993: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2954:Korrektor1917 2950: 2949: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2933: 2929: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2915:Korrektor1917 2911: 2907: 2904: 2900: 2897: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2885: 2882: 2879: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2847: 2846:Korrektor1917 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2810:47.201.71.161 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2790:LonelyBoy2012 2787: 2782: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2762: 2761: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2744:LonelyBoy2012 2741: 2736: 2735:Avigdor Eskin 2731: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2703: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2673: 2670:parameter to 2661: 2657: 2650: 2649: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2620: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2593: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572:Vaughan Pratt 2569: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2551:Vaughan Pratt 2548: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2537:Vaughan Pratt 2534: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2516: 2513: 2509: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2500:Vaughan Pratt 2497: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2486:Vaughan Pratt 2482: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467:Vaughan Pratt 2464: 2459: 2457: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2415: 2414: 2406: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2371: 2366: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2327: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2271: 2268: 2265: 2264:Roger Griffin 2261: 2257: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2237: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2199: 2194: 2191: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2182: 2179: 2175: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2139: 2133: 2127: 2126: 2123: 2122: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2097: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2078: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2024: 2022: 2020: 2015: 2011: 2009: 2004: 2001: 1998: 1994: 1992: 1988: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1855: 1852: 1851: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1780: 1777: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1754: 1751: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1675: 1674: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1562: 1557: 1555: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1487: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1470: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437:95.238.32.198 1433: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1320: 1317: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1304: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1242: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1171: 1169: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1154: 1144: 1139: 1137: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1125: 1121: 1115: 1111: 1105: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1070:95.238.32.198 1067: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1003: 999: 994: 993: 992: 988: 984: 980: 979: 978: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 953: 952: 937: 929: 925: 924: 923: 916: 912: 906: 899: 898: 888: 885: 884: 881: 880:Top 25 Report 877: 870: 869: 860: 855: 850: 849: 835: 834: 827: 824: 822: 819: 818: 815: 814: 810: 805: 800: 799: 796: 789: 787: 783: 779: 775: 770: 768: 764: 759: 756: 752: 751: 735: 731: 725: 722: 721: 718: 701: 697: 693: 692: 684: 678: 673: 671: 668: 664: 663: 659: 653: 650: 647: 643: 630: 629: 619: 615: 614: 610: 609: 599: 595: 594: 590: 586: 580: 577: 576: 573: 556: 552: 548: 543: 539: 535: 534: 526: 525:Russia portal 515: 513: 510: 506: 505: 501: 494: 490: 485: 482: 479: 475: 462: 461: 451: 447: 446: 443: 426: 425:documentation 422: 418: 414: 413: 405: 394: 392: 389: 385: 384: 380: 376: 371: 368: 365: 361: 356: 352: 346: 338: 337: 327: 323: 318: 317: 309: 308: 303: 299: 295: 292: 288: 284: 283: 278: 276: 275: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 246: 242:This page is 241: 234: 233: 214: 213: 208: 204: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2842: 2807: 2780: 2774:antisemitic. 2771: 2739: 2732: 2728: 2707: 2701: 2679: 2671: 2660:edit request 2616: 2597: 2462: 2460: 2453: 2409: 2373: 2351: 2349: 2301: 2295:Noam Chomsky 2283:Sean Wilentz 2279:Paul Krugman 2274: 2255: 2170: 2166: 2128: 2117: 2115: 2018: 2007: 1941: 1939: 1907: 1849: 1775: 1749: 1732: 1718: 1715: 1669: 1637: 1603:+philosopher 1591:+"far right" 1553: 1528: 1489: 1473: 1467: 1394: 1363: 1323: 1306: 1245: 1205: 1203: 1167: 1149: 1147: 1135: 1118:— Preceding 1106: 1088:— Preceding 1084: 957:— Preceding 954: 948: 921: 913:Anchors are 910: 853: 808: 794: 771: 760: 729: 689: 626: 606: 584: 551:project page 546: 531: 458: 410: 351:WikiProjects 334: 305: 293: 286: 280: 202: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2939:Hob Gadling 2804:Car bombing 2601:StrongALPHA 2423:655 results 2138:editorials. 1985:Alan Ingram 1857:editorials. 1609:+strategist 1259:the archive 1021:GliderMaven 983:GliderMaven 538:WikiProject 245:not a forum 148:free images 31:not a forum 3046:Categories 2877:Excellent. 2664:|answered= 2555:FarHarBard 2520:FarHarBard 2262:refers to 2225:verifiable 2163:WP:NEWSORG 1802:manifesto? 1601:1,720 hits 1595:2,160 hits 1583:1,680 hits 1577:3,380 hits 1548:territory. 1542:WP:NOTHERE 1408:verifiable 767:designated 258:refactored 2991:evidence. 2511:collapse. 2236:WP:POINTy 2217:WP:YESPOV 2178:WP:WEIGHT 1322:sentence. 1110:Bobisland 826:Archive 2 821:Archive 1 780:, or any 430:Biography 370:Biography 339:is rated 298:libellous 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2972:Grayfell 2864:Grayfell 2758:article. 2702:Not done 2634:contribs 2439:contribs 2408:fascist. 2396:contribs 2335:Lucksash 2041:expert. 1903:sources. 1733:Guardian 1699:contribs 1683:592 hits 1660:contribs 1624:contribs 1607:172 hits 1597:+analyst 1589:664 hits 1585:+fascist 1518:contribs 1244:extreme. 1090:unsigned 971:contribs 959:unsigned 854:400 days 809:Archives 705:Politics 696:politics 652:Politics 203:400 days 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2786:groyper 2710:Timothy 2370:Fascist 1911:Europe. 1120:undated 963:Snate28 949:source 930:before. 732:on the 587:on the 341:C-class 264:at the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2740:enough 2171:rarely 2169:, are 1977:(both 1895:versa. 1892:Here's 1681:I get 1527:views. 1337:WP:CON 560:Russia 542:Russia 484:Russia 347:scale. 126:Google 2932:WP:RS 2772:quite 2668:|ans= 2658:This 2619:Dugin 2058:WP:RS 328:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3023:talk 3008:talk 2976:talk 2958:talk 2943:talk 2919:talk 2868:talk 2829:talk 2814:talk 2794:talk 2781:some 2748:talk 2714:talk 2686:talk 2630:talk 2605:talk 2576:talk 2559:talk 2541:talk 2524:talk 2490:talk 2471:talk 2435:talk 2392:talk 2339:talk 2316:talk 2245:talk 2227:and 2205:talk 2151:talk 2107:talk 2086:talk 2066:talk 2047:talk 2032:talk 2002:and 1989:and 1980:and 1965:talk 1919:talk 1883:talk 1865:talk 1828:talk 1813:talk 1798:had. 1789:talk 1760:talk 1695:talk 1656:talk 1620:talk 1544:and 1514:talk 1505:and 1441:talk 1420:talk 1410:and 1381:talk 1350:talk 1341:WP:V 1339:and 1281:talk 1267:talk 1224:talk 1193:talk 1114:talk 1098:talk 1074:talk 1056:talk 1039:talk 1025:talk 1002:talk 987:talk 967:talk 911:Tip: 761:The 536:, a 419:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2858:or 2712::: 2708:// 2666:or 2427:638 2312:TFD 2229:due 2201:TFD 2103:TFD 2043:TFD 1983:), 1957:TFD 1915:TFD 1899:is. 1861:TFD 1809:TFD 1756:TFD 1740:is. 1412:due 1116:) 724:Low 579:Low 287:BLP 256:or 176:TWL 3048:: 3025:) 3010:) 2978:) 2960:) 2945:) 2921:) 2870:) 2831:) 2816:) 2796:) 2750:) 2688:) 2672:no 2636:) 2632:/ 2607:) 2578:) 2561:) 2543:) 2526:) 2492:) 2473:) 2441:) 2437:/ 2398:) 2394:/ 2341:) 2318:) 2293:, 2289:, 2285:, 2281:, 2247:) 2207:) 2153:) 2109:) 2088:) 2068:) 2049:) 2034:) 1967:) 1921:) 1885:) 1867:) 1830:) 1815:) 1791:) 1762:) 1701:) 1697:/ 1662:) 1658:/ 1626:) 1622:/ 1520:) 1516:/ 1488:]. 1443:) 1422:) 1383:) 1352:) 1283:) 1269:) 1226:) 1195:) 1100:) 1076:) 1058:) 1041:) 1027:) 1004:) 989:) 973:) 969:• 491:/ 487:: 373:: 201:: 193:, 156:) 54:; 3021:( 3006:( 2974:( 2956:( 2941:( 2934:. 2917:( 2866:( 2848:: 2844:@ 2827:( 2812:( 2792:( 2746:( 2684:( 2628:( 2603:( 2574:( 2557:( 2549:@ 2539:( 2522:( 2498:@ 2488:( 2469:( 2433:( 2390:( 2337:( 2314:( 2243:( 2231:. 2203:( 2149:( 2134:: 2130:@ 2105:( 2084:( 2064:( 2045:( 2030:( 1963:( 1917:( 1881:( 1863:( 1826:( 1811:( 1787:( 1758:( 1752:) 1748:( 1693:( 1654:( 1618:( 1512:( 1472:. 1439:( 1418:( 1379:( 1348:( 1279:( 1265:( 1222:( 1191:( 1112:( 1096:( 1072:( 1054:( 1037:( 1023:( 1000:( 985:( 965:( 736:. 631:. 611:. 591:. 557:. 463:. 427:. 353:. 310:. 285:( 268:. 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index