Knowledge

Talk:Arcadia (play)

Source đź“ť

74: 53: 316: 300: 365: 344: 375: 22: 84: 202: 171: 212: 601:. In this context, discussing the work as a whole, I suggest that the book image is more appropriate and that it should be restored. Furthermore, albeit rather subjectively, the theatrical poster showing a couple dancing doesn't seem to relate to the work in any specific way: it's rather a commonplace concept. -- 945:
Moonraker I can recall and compare both London productions, but not those in other countries. I hope I'm editing dispassionately—I added "too clever by about two-and-three-quarters" and "mixed or unfavourable, citing anachronisms"—but I am a fan. I haven't gone into comparison between the London and
495:
I disagree with the opening explanation: "Latin phrase et in Arcadia ego which states that death is always present". It would be more accurate to say "usually interpreted" (as in the page on "et in Arcadia ego"). The reference to the phrase is explicit within the play, where the possible ambiguity of
1104:
I see Arcadia as a mystery. In the "present" timeframe, the audience wonders what happened in the past. In the "past", the audience wonders what happened to bring about the present. We wonder who killed Mr. Chater. We wonder who was the hermit, and when we find out, we wonder what drove Septimus
1100:
The current version of the "Genre" section mentions comedy and tragedy. Aristotle's comedy is a some awful slob becoming happy because of a singular quality. (E.g., Homer Simpson because he loves his family.) Tragedy is some nigh-perfect person falling from grace due to their flaw. (E.g. Lisa
996:
The difference is no longer commonly distinguished and if I found one that was wrong, I would leave it alone. However, someone has just changed the right to the wrong version, and that's different: "Inquiry/inquire refers to formal and organized investigations, whereas enquiry/enquire are used of
919:
Hi there. I hope it is not inappropriate to infer that you become a fan of this play because of its London production. I saw the play for the first time on Broadway during a recent trip to NYC. It was strangely uneven and dissatisfying. I plan to add the reviews later. I really feel that a play's
801:
I've just looked at Stoppard's stage directions, and I would like to remove the date for "the present" entirely -- he talks about the effect desired at length and does not specify a date for the later period. This is unlikely to be a chance omission. The stage direction as written leaves open the
770:
May we settle for one date in the article? The work specifies only "the present" which would give us, loosely, 1993. As far as I can see "1989" comes only from the publisher's commentary on the back cover: "same room 180 years later". From this I tend to prefer 1993 but don't really mind which as
734:
Well 24 hours isn't much time to declare no disagreement, but ok. The Age isn't a local paper, it's the major newspaper of Melbourne. The production was independent and noteworthy in Australia, but if you think that doesn't meet the criteria, I defer to your judgment. Any comparison I make to the
1042:
Good catch. I hadn't noticed this (I need to turn up the character size on screen to check anything closely these days—see comments about "old" editors, above) so grateful thanks for pointing it out. The verb/noun change was correct: it's just that the spelling choice in the changed version that
805:
I think substituting the date of the premiere for "the present" is original interpretation. We can describe the performance history of the play as: "the present (1993 in the play's first production)" but I don't think we should assign a date to the later period as if it were part of the play as
1101:
Simpson fails because of arrogance.) These teach us to admire the singular quality or distain the tragic flaw. While Arcadia contains a lot of humor, it's not "comedy" as Aristotle defines it. While I see some tragedy (Nightingale, Mr. Chater, Brice), it is not the dominant theme.
508:
LADY CROOM: ...and I can say with the painter, 'Et in Arcadia ego!' 'Here I am in Arcadia,' Thomasina. THOMASINA: If Mama would have it so. LADY CROOM: Is she correcting my taste or my translation? THOMASINA: Neither are beyond correction, but it was your geography caused the doubt.
455:
I have a bit of a problem with the first paragraph's claim that the word "Arcadia" is a reference to "Et in Arcadia ego". That's like saying that the word "happiness" is violent because it's a reference to the phrase "happiness is a warm gun".
961:
Thanks for your reply. I didn't mean to doubt the neutrality of this article, and I do believe the significance of this play. In fact, I went to see the Broadway production exactly because I've heard great things about
802:
possibility that a production of the play in 2020 (I expect that the play will continue to be produced) would be set not in 1809 and the late twentieth century but in 1809 and the early twenty-first.
1186: 307: 181: 1201: 1191: 1028:
I just took a close look; the original text used the wrong plural form "enquires" as opposed to "enquiries". Maybe that's why some editor brought up the whole verb/noun thing. -
696:: the articles should be written with "regard to long-term historical perspective"? Convince me that this addition has notability that matches this standard, (while avoiding the 1206: 877:
I see your point. But you don't find the claim of "dispelled any remaining critical doubts" a bit troubling? Especially since it is based on a roundup of merely six reviews. -
966:. Considering the high praise it received in London, I'm afraid that this new NY revival is not doing the play full justice. I have great memories of the Broadway staging of 946:
NY shows, but if you research this, particularly the first NY production, it will bear out your point about the quality of staging influencing perception of the writing. --
615:
I would agree - most productions of Arcadia I have seen emphasize the garden/grounds and possibly a country home. The dancing is a relatively minor part of the production.
1181: 1196: 1133:
This artice fails to address the obvious question of whether and how the play may relate to the Sannazaro poem of 1504. The question should at least be acknowledged.
233:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
323: 185: 1216: 1176: 433: 423: 270: 260: 1221: 1161: 153: 143: 1166: 472: 235: 1211: 1171: 1002: 998: 1071:
Hey, it's a tiny typo, easy to slip. I just changed it back to "enquiries". If the sources use "enquiry", then it should be "enquiry". -
505:
I wouldn't say that the phrase is discussed as being ambiguous in the play. It's quite clear that Lady Croom's translation is incorrect:
661: 525: 119: 1112:
has a similar structure, where the present is trying to uncover the past and the past must find its way to the start of the present.
1156: 392: 349: 225: 176: 544:
Can I please have more refferences, especially on some of the casual facts such as "Felicity Kendal (Stoppard's then lover)"
858:
gets richer with each viewing ... there is poetry and passion behind the mathematics and metaphysics" and the "the greatest
813: 115: 97: 58: 567:
This article is about the play; celebrity gossip about the personal lives of those associated with the productions seems
697: 33: 598: 862:
of its time" (all emphasis added) make the meaning obvious, and the change is not justified. I propose a revert. --
73: 52: 468: 809: 1105:
to become the hermit. We wonder if Nightingale's arrogance be found out (like we all feel he deserves).
1062: 1048: 1018: 951: 910: 896: 867: 828: 791: 776: 755: 722: 705: 657: 635: 606: 576: 529: 846:
seems to be based on a misreading of the text following: it changed "dispel...critical doubts" about the
594: 518:
Both of these refer to Poussin's paintings, which are intended as "memento mori," or reminders of death.
464: 735:
noteworthiness of other productions listed here would fall under that other stuff exists rule I suppose.
740: 685: 102: 39: 823:
Good suggestion. There has just been a drive-by edit changing this again, so: the sooner the better! --
545: 1138: 1134: 521: 460: 21: 968: 736: 497: 555: 1076: 1058: 1044: 1033: 1014: 981: 947: 925: 906: 892: 882: 863: 824: 787: 772: 751: 718: 701: 651: 631: 602: 572: 559: 684:
at Chapel off Chapel, "City of Stonnington’s premier Arts Venue". I don't want to fall into the
648:
Rather than have it deleted completely, I added it to the more appropriate Production section.
1119: 380: 217: 693: 620: 597:
is a theatrical poster for one production of the play whereas the image it replaced was the
568: 486: 976:
may not represent Mr. Stoppard's finest work, but the NY production is just marvelous. -
89: 315: 299: 1150: 1109: 1072: 1029: 977: 921: 878: 682: 1115: 689: 1108:
Also, it might be good to connect the page to other works with two time periods.
891:
OK then: back to the original reading, but substituting that particular phrase. --
616: 482: 398: 370: 364: 343: 230: 207: 79: 771:
long as it's the same throughout. Any other views, before I tidy this up? --
920:
reception greatly depends on the the quality of a specific production. -
396:, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of 1142: 1123: 1080: 1066: 1052: 1037: 1022: 985: 955: 929: 914: 900: 886: 871: 832: 817: 795: 780: 759: 744: 726: 709: 665: 639: 624: 610: 580: 562: 548: 533: 500: 489: 229:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 106: 83: 201: 170: 114:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
571:. To answer my own question, above: no it doesn't. Deleting.-- 15: 314: 298: 843: 700:
argument), and I will happily withdraw my objection. --
678: 681:
reinserted a production by a non-professional company
281: 750:I accept that 24 hours was a bit swift, sorry. -- 1187:Low-importance philosophical literature articles 1202:Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles 558:, but does it need to go into the main page? -- 481:What do you think "Arcadia" is referring to? 8: 1192:Philosophical literature task force articles 1207:Contemporary philosophy task force articles 338: 278: 165: 47: 1182:B-Class philosophical literature articles 515:SEPTIMUS: "Even in Arcadia, there am I!" 1197:B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles 1129:Play relationship to Sannazaro 1504 poem 674:City of Stonnington’s premier Arts Venue 340: 167: 49: 19: 239:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 688:trap here so, as well as my previous 7: 223:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 1217:Low-importance Derbyshire articles 1177:Low-importance Philosophy articles 1007:Verbs and nouns don't come into it 14: 905:That looks like a fix. Thanks. -- 599:cover of the original publication 997:single and personal questions" ( 408:Knowledge:WikiProject Derbyshire 373: 363: 342: 245:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 210: 200: 169: 82: 72: 51: 20: 1222:WikiProject Derbyshire articles 1162:Low-importance Theatre articles 428:This article has been rated as 411:Template:WikiProject Derbyshire 402:-related articles on Knowledge. 265:This article has been rated as 248:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 148:This article has been rated as 1: 760:06:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC) 745:23:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 727:08:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC) 710:07:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 128:Knowledge:WikiProject Theatre 1167:WikiProject Theatre articles 1009:. I propose a return to the 698:Knowledge:Other stuff exists 581:21:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 490:18:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 131:Template:WikiProject Theatre 1212:B-Class Derbyshire articles 1172:B-Class Philosophy articles 1143:20:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 1043:contravenes the sources. -- 717:OK, no disagreement: RV. -- 692:objection, may I expand on 496:the phrase is discussed. -- 1238: 1081:06:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1067:06:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1053:06:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1038:05:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1023:05:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 986:11:00, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 956:10:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 930:09:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 915:09:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 901:08:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 887:08:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 872:08:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 690:notability not established 434:project's importance scale 271:project's importance scale 154:project's importance scale 854:". Quotes such as: "the 534:15:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 501:13:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 427: 358: 322: 306: 277: 264: 195: 147: 105:dedicated to coverage of 67: 46: 1157:B-Class Theatre articles 1124:18:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 839:Play, not the production 833:21:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 818:19:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 796:15:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC) 781:07:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC) 666:17:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 640:05:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 625:10:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 611:05:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 563:09:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 549:14:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 308:Philosophical literature 95:This article is part of 324:Contemporary philosophy 282:Associated task forces: 118:, or contribute to the 1057:Thanks for the fix. -- 595:File:ArcadiaPoster.jpg 393:Derbyshire WikiProject 319: 303: 226:WikiProject Philosophy 28:This article is rated 318: 302: 554:Kendall/Stoppard is 390:is supported by the 969:The Coast of Utopia 806:written. It isn't. 414:Derbyshire articles 251:Philosophy articles 98:WikiProject Theatre 320: 304: 236:general discussion 120:project discussion 34:content assessment 536: 524:comment added by 477: 463:comment added by 451:Et in Arcadia ego 448: 447: 444: 443: 440: 439: 381:Derbyshire portal 337: 336: 333: 332: 329: 328: 218:Philosophy portal 164: 163: 160: 159: 1229: 850:to "acclaimed... 810:Distingué Traces 655: 519: 476: 457: 416: 415: 412: 409: 406: 383: 378: 377: 376: 367: 360: 359: 354: 346: 339: 289: 279: 253: 252: 249: 246: 243: 220: 215: 214: 213: 204: 197: 196: 191: 188: 173: 166: 136: 135: 134:Theatre articles 132: 129: 126: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1147: 1146: 1131: 1098: 1011:status quo ante 994: 992:Enquire/inquire 841: 768: 676: 649: 591: 542: 465:213.107.107.172 458: 453: 413: 410: 407: 404: 403: 386:The article on 379: 374: 372: 352: 287: 250: 247: 244: 241: 240: 216: 211: 209: 189: 179: 133: 130: 127: 124: 123: 112:To participate: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 1235: 1233: 1225: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1204: 1199: 1194: 1189: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1149: 1148: 1130: 1127: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 993: 990: 989: 988: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 840: 837: 836: 835: 799: 798: 767: 764: 763: 762: 732: 731: 730: 729: 686:WP:IDONTKNOWIT 675: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 643: 642: 593:The new image 590: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 541: 538: 498:RichardVeryard 493: 492: 452: 449: 446: 445: 442: 441: 438: 437: 430:Low-importance 426: 420: 419: 417: 388:Arcadia (play) 385: 384: 368: 356: 355: 353:Low‑importance 347: 335: 334: 331: 330: 327: 326: 321: 311: 310: 305: 295: 294: 292: 290: 284: 283: 275: 274: 267:Low-importance 263: 257: 256: 254: 222: 221: 205: 193: 192: 190:Low‑importance 174: 162: 161: 158: 157: 150:Low-importance 146: 140: 139: 137: 110: 109:on Knowledge. 94: 93: 90:Theatre portal 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1234: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1128: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1111: 1110:Cryptonomicon 1106: 1102: 1095: 1093: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1059:Old Moonraker 1056: 1055: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1045:Old Moonraker 1041: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015:Old Moonraker 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 970: 965: 960: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 948:Old Moonraker 944: 931: 927: 923: 918: 917: 916: 912: 908: 907:Old Moonraker 904: 903: 902: 898: 894: 893:Old Moonraker 890: 889: 888: 884: 880: 876: 875: 874: 873: 869: 865: 864:Old Moonraker 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 838: 834: 830: 826: 825:Old Moonraker 822: 821: 820: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 797: 793: 789: 788:Old Moonraker 785: 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 773:Old Moonraker 766:"The present" 765: 761: 757: 753: 752:Old Moonraker 749: 748: 747: 746: 742: 738: 728: 724: 720: 719:Old Moonraker 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 702:Old Moonraker 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 680: 673: 667: 663: 659: 654: 653: 652:LiteraryMaven 647: 646: 645: 644: 641: 637: 633: 632:Old Moonraker 629: 628: 627: 626: 622: 618: 613: 612: 608: 604: 603:Old Moonraker 600: 596: 588: 582: 578: 574: 573:Old Moonraker 570: 566: 565: 564: 561: 560:Old Moonraker 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 547: 539: 537: 535: 531: 527: 523: 516: 513: 510: 506: 503: 502: 499: 491: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 450: 435: 431: 425: 422: 421: 418: 401: 400: 395: 394: 389: 382: 371: 369: 366: 362: 361: 357: 351: 348: 345: 341: 325: 317: 313: 312: 309: 301: 297: 296: 293: 291: 286: 285: 280: 276: 272: 268: 262: 259: 258: 255: 238: 237: 232: 228: 227: 219: 208: 206: 203: 199: 198: 194: 187: 183: 178: 175: 172: 168: 155: 151: 145: 142: 141: 138: 121: 117: 113: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1132: 1114: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1091: 1010: 1006: 995: 973: 967: 963: 942: 940: 859: 855: 851: 847: 842: 808: 804: 800: 769: 733: 677: 650: 614: 592: 543: 526:66.106.6.179 517: 514: 511: 507: 504: 494: 454: 429: 397: 391: 387: 266: 234: 224: 186:Contemporary 149: 116:project page 111: 96: 40:WikiProjects 1135:Lloyd Ewing 546:203.59.9.15 520:—Preceding 459:—Preceding 103:WikiProject 1151:Categories 1001:, also in 852:production 540:References 405:Derbyshire 399:Derbyshire 350:Derbyshire 242:Philosophy 231:philosophy 182:Literature 177:Philosophy 972:in 2007. 844:This edit 694:WP:RECENT 679:This edit 589:New Image 569:off topic 512:Later... 1073:Artoasis 1030:Artoasis 978:Artoasis 922:Artoasis 879:Artoasis 737:Paulknox 630:Done. -- 522:unsigned 473:contribs 461:unsigned 1116:Mdnahas 964:Arcadia 786:Done.-- 662:contrib 432:on the 269:on the 152:on the 125:Theatre 107:theatre 59:Theatre 30:B-class 1003:Fowler 999:Peters 974:Utopia 617:Ecragg 36:scale. 1096:Genre 483:Doops 1139:talk 1120:talk 1077:talk 1063:talk 1049:talk 1034:talk 1019:talk 1013:. -- 982:talk 952:talk 926:talk 911:talk 897:talk 883:talk 868:talk 860:play 856:play 848:play 829:talk 814:talk 792:talk 777:talk 756:talk 741:talk 723:talk 706:talk 658:talk 636:talk 621:talk 607:talk 577:talk 556:here 530:talk 487:talk 469:talk 101:, a 1005:). 943:Old 941:As 424:Low 261:Low 144:Low 1153:: 1141:) 1122:) 1079:) 1065:) 1051:) 1036:) 1021:) 984:) 954:) 928:) 913:) 899:) 885:) 870:) 831:) 816:) 794:) 779:) 758:) 743:) 725:) 708:) 664:) 660:• 638:) 623:) 609:) 579:) 532:) 485:| 475:) 471:• 288:/ 184:/ 180:: 1137:( 1118:( 1075:( 1061:( 1047:( 1032:( 1017:( 980:( 950:( 924:( 909:( 895:( 881:( 866:( 827:( 812:( 790:( 775:( 754:( 739:( 721:( 704:( 656:( 634:( 619:( 605:( 575:( 528:( 467:( 436:. 273:. 156:. 122:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Theatre
WikiProject icon
icon
Theatre portal
WikiProject Theatre
WikiProject
theatre
project page
project discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Philosophy
Literature
Contemporary
WikiProject icon
Philosophy portal
WikiProject Philosophy
philosophy
general discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑