720:. Sometime around 1933, T.W. Norcross (who was USAF Chief Engineer from 1920 to 1947) hired W. Ellis Groben as the first architect on the HQ staff. Individual architects were also hired at each USFS region. To meet the demand for designs to support Civilian Conservation Corps construction projects, the regional architects hired additional architects and landscape designers to supervise the CCC work. This was the genesis of the regional architecture groups. In 1938, Groben released a book of "acceptable plans" for USFS administrative buildings. The era of handcrafted CCC buildings ended with the onset of World War II. After the war, there was an increase in recreational use of national forest lands. As a result, USFS architects began designing campgrounds, restrooms, trails, and other outdoors facilities. By the 1950s, most construction projects were for restoration or replacement of aging facilities. In the early 1960s, USFS architecture staffing surpassed the number of professionals that designed projects for the CCC. In the 1970s, USFS construction work was re-focused on environmental projects. More recently, modern visitor centers have been constructed in National Forests across the country. Hope this is helpful! For more info on USFS architectural organizations, you might consider contacting the
490:
correspond to about 25 OR and WA properties on the current list, and perhaps to split out the Region 2 group, which is architect of record for 4 items in WY. Please note the included list is not currently, and was not intended to be, a list of all notable buildings on U.S. Forest
Service property designed by just anyone. The included list is, rather, a list of works whose architecture is attributed to the USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group or name variations, which may turn out to be several distinct offices/entities. This is like an architectural firm article, which usually includes a list of major works of the firm, which themselves are often not specifically attributable to just one architect of the firm. I don't think it will be possible to divide the current list by individual architects involved in each one, because attribution is shared. For example, I have now seen multiple individual architects given partial credit for aspects of design of
543:(ec) Or, the current article might be revised to include specifics about the architecture of several groups. Orlady's assertions to the contrary, there's a lot in the "Depression-Era Buildings" of OR and WA document about the Northwest office and some information regarding it vs. other divisions of Forest Service architects. One passage is: "Each Forest Service Region developed characteristic expression of the rustic style that was particular to its geographical area, and predicated in part, on traditional architectural styles and building techniques. The style that emerged from the Pacific Northwest Region had no clearly identifiable architectural prototype, but reflected the inf1uence of the English Cottage and Norman Farmhouse styles." (page 6).
1355:
regional style and was approved of by the national consulting architect in the 1940 document. Its architects are the
Architecture Group that editors at the AFD are saying never existed. :) Also, there is more about the Region 3 Arizona, due to availability of corresponding MPS document, than for others, so it should probably be second (i'll move it now). I agree that an upfront explanation of the order of presentation, if different than numeric order, is needed. Feel free o try a different ordering and to revise the introduction or otherwise develop. I am, myself, pretty sick of the AFD about this, which continues after all the early arguments against this article have been disproved. --
582:
government organization that probably never existed under the name you have given it here, and about which you have only the slightest amount of information. I'm trying to decide between (1) moving this page to your user space, (2) taking it to AfD, or (3) simply slapping notability and original research templates on the article. You could, however, prevent any and all of these outcomes by voluntarily moving the page to your user space until you have obtained and documented some solid information on which to base an encyclopedic article on whatever topic turns out to be appropriate. --
314:, a "thematic resources" document of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) which is basis for NRHP listing of some of the Oregon and Washington state properties. I am creating articles for some of the places listed in this article and found this document. I think it should provide some more context, tho i have yet to read it in detail. I may be able to dig up more documents too, but NRHP documents are on-line generally for only some of the states relevant here (including OR but not WA, ID). --
210:
374:. When I looked at the article after seeing Hike395's comment, my first reaction was that this was a speculative piece that does not belong in article space. I realized, however, that it is a legitimate list of buildings associated with the Forest Service that have historic designations, so I decided to helpfully repurpose it as a list and add wikilinks to some other relevant articles. Silly of me to dream that my good intentions might possibly be received with something other than derision.
99:
81:
50:
395:
an encyclopedia article. However, as I indicated above, the list has merit. I greatly prefer to simply repurpose the article, rather than waste other administrators' time with your insistence on a full-blown requested-move discussion. But if your goal is to call negative attention to yourself on
Knowledge noticeboards once again, I suppose that an RM discussion might help you do that. --
109:
200:
633:
as facts warrant, was and is appropriate. Knowledge is not done; there was no coverage of this topic before. Orlady's butting in with argumentative judgments (such as the incorrect assertion that the
Northwest group is discussed only once within one document), coming from a non-interested-in-NRHPs, non-interested-in-architecture perspective, is not helpful IMHO. --
410:
for it, frankly. Orlady, i wish you would choose not to splash all sorts of negativity here. Let hiker guy and me and others develop some, like i said already. You're not really interested in NRHP-listed places or architects, are you? You have said you are not, repeatedly. So, I would prefer you would comment somewhere else, and leave this to those interested. --
179:
21:
611:
specifically attributed to the USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group, which now seems to mean the
Pacific Northwest region group. It is documented that the Pacific Northwest region group has a distinct character, an architectural design "voice", and it is documented who several of its individual architects are.
409:
That passage you quote is what i just added to this article, before seeing Orlady's comment here. It's not the only mention of the architecture group in the document however, contrary to Orlady's assertion. I don't know what the "bottom line" really is yet, but i wouldn't want to take Orlady's word
711:
In 1908, the USFS established an
Engineering Division at its Washington HQ along with subordinate engineering organizations in each of its regional offices. The HQ approved project funding, but building designs were left to the rangers in the field. In fact prior to 1917, there is no record of the
632:
All that might be emerging is that the article should perhaps be renamed and reorganized to cover several architecture groups, each with a sublist of works, or equivalently that the article should be split into several articles. I think starting the article as was done, and sorting out organization
431:
Ah, you say that is not the only mention of the "Architecture Group" in the article. I find one other mention, except it says that they were the "Architectural Group." I suppose you are now going to revise the article to say that this historic division of the Forest
Service was "sometimes also known
394:
Bottom line is that the "Architecture Group" is 5 people who once worked in a Forest
Service Region Office. It is not clear from the source that the organization named in your article title of "United States Forest Service Architecture Group" ever existed. There is no basis for it to be the topic of
369:
Hike395's comment and your reply make it clear that you have no idea what the "United States Forest
Service Architecture Group" is or was (including whether it still exists), but you decided to write a factual article on the subject of the Architecture Group, apparently based solely on the existence
581:
There's no question that there is merit in documenting the historic architecture of the New Deal era, but that does not justify creating a new article before you have anything more than a vague idea that there might possibly be a topic out there, somewhere. You have created an article about a small
494:
in OR. And when "USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group" or a variation is specifically given as the architect of record for a place, that probably means that credit cannot be assigned to just one individual. I do think that some of the individual architects merit separate articles, such as the new
339:
Apparently because i edited here, and because the editor can find fault, an editor who follows my edits (but bizarrely claims not to) chose to move this article with no discussion. I returned it. I don't welcome a
Requested Move discussion, because this article is better left to be developed as I
504:
Please note also that heavy-handed titling as a "List of..." is not required. Lists of works often are included within articles named for a specific architect or architectural firm. Sometimes lists of works are split out, when the biographical article seems best split from a too-long list. Here
610:
Not surprisingly, I disagree with Orlady's views. There is merit in starting an article about an architectural group of the U.S. government that is notable, just as there is for notable private architectural firms, and sooner is basically better than later. In this case there are about 25 works
1354:
That could work, but I don't know that there is material conveniently available about architects and distinctive styles of each region. The Pacific northwest Region 6 is most important and I think it works to have it be first, as it is now. It is the one region that had developed on its own a
699:
Doncram asked me for comments on this article--so here go... Don’t believe there has ever been a single U.S. Forest Service Architecture Group. However, each USFS region has had an architecture group within its Engineering Division for a long time—most of these groups date back to the 1930s.
434:
And while I don't share your fascination with the details of what day a site was listed on the Register, what its serial number is, whether the roof is made with asphalt shingles or shakes, and how many tenths of an acre are in the tract, I refuse to give up caring about history and people and
489:
I am certainly open to some adjustment as the facts are made more clear by development of individual articles and by uncovering of sources. One option may be to split out the Pacific Northwest regional office architectural group, which I believe is Region 6, into one article, which seems to
1338:
As of now, the article is organized by region. If that is the appropriate way to organize the article (and I'm not saying it isn't), it would be helpful to put them in numeric order and to have an introductory sentence identifying the states/territory covered by each region.
1406:
465:
Now, I think we should think about how to improve the article, rather than rushing to delete. One possibility is to split the article into multiple lists. If each architect in the group is notable, then we can easily write list articles like
462:, because the group is only mentioned twice in one NRHP article. I don't think this counts as "significant coverage", because we still don't know basic facts about the group. I did some more research, tonight, and still didn't find anything.
31:
370:
of entries in the National Register's NRIS database that name this group. This kind of creation of content from little more than thin air is one of the types of behavior that have placed you on the hot seat recently at
708:. It has excellent sources and numerous Public Domain photos and perspective drawing. It also lists the names of USFS architects and has biographies of leading USFS architects. Here’s quick outline of its contents:
1401:
270:
260:
1396:
432:
as the 'Architectural Group'." Basically, however, you are making an article out of thin air. If you don't know what the basic facts about the topic are, you should not be creating articles in article space.
388:
in the Regional Office responsible for all building design and site planning included architects Linn A. Forrest, Howard L. Gifford, James Pollock and W.I. "Tim" Turner, and Landscape Architect Emmett U.
236:
377:
You supply another reference above. The document you cite only confirms that there is no basis for the article title. That document is about Forest Service buildings that were mostly built by the
223:
184:
292:
After a brief search, I cannot find material on the web that supports this article: does the group currently exist? What dates was it active? Where does it fit into the USFS organization?
1391:
748:
155:
704:. That will re-focus the article on the history of USFS architecture rather than small functional organizations within the agency. Here’s a great document on the
161:
763:
Ironically, that list was the most solid part of this article, since the organization that is the ostensible subject of the article may not have existed. --
1146:
215:
1386:
960:
948:
912:
788:
712:
USFS employing any architects on its staff. Two important documents that helped standardize USFS architectural designs were published in 1928—the
131:
474:
section of each of these list articles can point to the rest, precisely because the architects worked together. What do other editors think? —
936:
510:
There are perhaps a few editors who might be interested in developing split-out on the Northwest regional architect group, including perhaps
1316:
232:
996:
1062:
122:
86:
1092:
984:
990:
340:
was proceeding. At some later time a rename may be appropriate. But, if someone opens a move discussion i will comment there. --
1158:
467:
1098:
518:
and apparently had obtained its NRHP document among many other sources used in the first mainspace version of that article. --
1080:
906:
1366:
644:
563:
529:
421:
351:
325:
1128:
1116:
1047:, Randle Ranger Station, Gifford Pinchot National Forest Randle WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
1032:
882:
864:
61:
1044:
1152:
1119:, Illinois Valley Rd., Siskiyou National Forest Cave Junction OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
876:
867:, Illinois Valley Rd., Siskiyou National Forest Cave Junction OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
794:
378:
1056:
1002:
894:
836:
824:
806:
1371:
1348:
772:
757:
747:
related to the subject of the article. Moving unverified items back here will not be considered edit warring, per
733:
683:
649:
591:
568:
534:
483:
444:
426:
404:
356:
330:
304:
930:
900:
858:
812:
782:
27:
1161:, Forest Rd. 285 S of Springerville, Apache--Sitgreaves NF Springerville AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
384:
The Region 6 expression of rustic was intended to characterize the Forest Service in the Pacific Northwest. The
1122:
1008:
918:
855:, Nezperce National Forest, 9 mi. N of USFS Burgdorf Guard Sta, Burgdorf, ID (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
830:
505:
there is no apparent need yet to split out a separate architectural firm type article from a list of its works.
1149:, Mt. Baker, Snoqualmie National Forest Granite Falls WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
49:
1050:
1134:
1074:
1014:
954:
852:
818:
752:
873:, Off WY 130 NW of Centennial, Medicine Bow NF Centennial WY (USDA Forest Service, Region 2), NRHP-listed
1026:
966:
888:
870:
840:
800:
705:
1077:, Forest Rd. 130 (formerly AZ 260), Apache-Sitgreaves NF Pinedale AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1321:
1164:
1104:
1086:
1020:
951:, IA 86 about 4 mi. N-NW of jct. with US 71 Milford IA (USDA Bureau of Biological Survey), NRHP-listed
846:
67:
1140:
1068:
1038:
1011:, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Enterprise OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
978:
972:
942:
924:
885:, In Chiricahua Wilderness NE of Douglas, Coronado NF Douglas AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
515:
785:, N of Big Creek, Idaho Primitive Area, Payette NF, Big Creek, ID (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
381:(not the Forest Service). The only mention of the "Architecture Group" is in the following passage:
20:
1035:, Roughly bounded by Mondeaux River and Forest Rd. Westboro WI (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
987:, Gifford Pinchot National Forest Packwood WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
114:
945:, Rogue River National Forest Butte Falls OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
827:, Rogue River National Forest, Butte Falls, OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
821:, WY 130 E of Saratoga, Medicine Bow NF, Saratoga, WY (USDA Forest Service, Region 2), NRHP-listed
235:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
130:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1137:, Forest Rd. 68F SW of Camp Verde, Prescott NF Camp Verde AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1095:, Gifford Pinchot National Forest Randle WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
861:, Mt. Hood National Forest Cascade Locks OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
1143:, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Unity OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
1023:, Off Sabino Canyon Rd. NE of Tucson, Coronado NF Tucson AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1005:, Wenatchee National Forest Leavenworth WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
879:, Wenatchee National Forest Leavenworth WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
993:, Winema National Forest Klamath Falls OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
98:
80:
1361:
933:, Siskiyou National Forest Gold Beach OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
639:
558:
524:
479:
416:
346:
320:
300:
897:, NE of Black Canyon City, Tonto NF Black Canyon City AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
815:, Willamette National Forest, Detroit, OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
1053:, Mt. Hood National Forest Parkdale OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
1017:, Okanogan National Forest Tonasket WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
999:, Ochoco National Forest Prineville OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
915:, Okanogan National Forest Winthrop WA (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
768:
729:
679:
587:
491:
440:
400:
1131:, Malheur National Forest John Day OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
963:, Malheur National Forest John Day OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
311:
1344:
1167:, Mt. Hood National Forest Zigzag OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
1125:, AZ 87 W of Punkin Center, Tonto NF Punkin Center AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
981:, SW of Douglas, Medicine Bow NF Douglas WY (USDA Forest Service, Region 2), NRHP-listed
496:
1089:, Forest Rd. 42A SW of Portal, Coronado NF Portal AZ (Usda Forest Service), NRHP-listed
833:, Deschutes National Forest, Bend, OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
849:, Forest Rd. 52B N of Canelo, Coronado NF, Canelo, AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
803:, Yellow Pine, Payette National Forest, Big Creek, ID (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1059:, Deschutes National Park Bend OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
975:, W of Albany, Medicine Bow NF Albany WY (USDA Forest Service, Region 2), NRHP-listed
927:, Umpqua National Forest Glide OR (USDA Forest Svce. Architecture Group), NRHP-listed
1380:
1110:
797:, Off I-17 NE of Rimrock, Coconino NF, Rimrock, AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
499:(one of those who gets partial credit for Timberline Lodge) which I opened yesterday.
228:
1041:, Off US 180 N of Tusayan, Kaibab NF Tusayan AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1356:
891:, AZ 366 SW of Safford, Coronado NF Safford AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
634:
553:
519:
475:
411:
371:
341:
315:
296:
127:
1101:, SE of Chiricahua NM, Coronado NF Douglas AZ (Usda Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1065:, Sitting Bull Falls, Lincoln NF Carlsbad NM (USDA-Forest Service), NRHP-listed
939:, Sitting Bull Falls, Lincoln NF Carlsbad NM (USDA-Forest Service), NRHP-listed
909:, Sitting Bull Falls, Lincoln NF Carlsbad NM (USDA-Forest Service), NRHP-listed
903:, W of Crown King, Prescott NF Crown King AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
764:
725:
675:
583:
511:
459:
436:
396:
1107:, Brewer Rd. S. of Hart Rd. Sedona AZ (USDA/USFS Standard Plans), NRHP-listed
809:, Along Ryan Rd., Kaibab NF, Big Springs, AZ (Usda Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1340:
1155:, NW of Prescott, Prescott NF Prescott AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
205:
104:
1407:
Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
721:
921:, National Forest Rd. 2181 Alvin WI (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
108:
791:, Boise National Forest, Atlanta, ID (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
199:
178:
1083:, S of AZ 288, Tonto NF Young AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
957:, Address Restricted Isabella MN (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
458:
I'm also concerned about this article: I don't think it fulfills the
1071:, S of Globe, Tonto NF Globe AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
749:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive224#Doncram NRHP stubs
1311:
969:, 309 Gorge St. Ketchikan AK (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
1113:, Off US 80 Tallulah LA (USDA Delta Laboratory), NRHP-listed
714:
Forest Service National Manual of Regulations and Instructions
552:
Sigh, i see SarekOfVulcan is now butting in too. Oh great. --
43:
15:
1402:
Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
674:
In view of the above response, I took the article to AfD. --
1029:, SE of Avery Avery ID (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
778:
Notable works (with attribution variations noted) include:
245:
Knowledge:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
1397:
Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
248:
Template:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
227:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
700:
Regarding this article, I’d recommend changing title to
937:
Group Picnic Shelter-Sitting Bull Falls Recreation Area
310:
Work of the "Architecture Group" is described some in
295:
Hopefully other editors can provide this information —
126:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
997:Lamonta Compound-Prineville Supervisor's Warehouse
160:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1063:Picnic Shelter-Sitting Bull Falls Recreation Area
843:, Williams, AZ (USDA Forest Service), NRHP-listed
224:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
251:National Register of Historic Places articles
8:
991:Lake of the Woods Ranger Station-Work Center
743:Moved from mainpage, as many items here are
1147:Verlot Ranger Station-Public Service Center
468:List of buildings designed by James Pollock
312:this "Depression-Era Buildings TR" document
216:National Register of Historic Places portal
47:
949:Iowa Lakeside Laboratory Historic District
173:
75:
961:John Day Compound, Supervisor's Warehouse
722:National Museum of Forest Service History
702:United States Forest Service Architecture
1392:Unknown-importance Architecture articles
913:Early Winters Ranger Station Work Center
789:Atlanta Ranger Station Historic District
1306:
1304:
1302:
1300:
1298:
1296:
1294:
1292:
1290:
1288:
1286:
1284:
1282:
1280:
1278:
1276:
1274:
1272:
1270:
1268:
1266:
1264:
1262:
1260:
1258:
1256:
1254:
1252:
1250:
1248:
1246:
1244:
1242:
1240:
1238:
1236:
1234:
1232:
1230:
1228:
1226:
1224:
1222:
1220:
1218:
1216:
1214:
1212:
1210:
1208:
1206:
1204:
1202:
1200:
1176:
175:
77:
1312:"National Register Information System"
1198:
1196:
1194:
1192:
1190:
1188:
1186:
1184:
1182:
1180:
907:Dam-Sitting Bull Falls Recreation Area
706:history of Forest Service architecture
718:Construction and Maintenance Handbook
30:on 19 July 2011 (UTC). The result of
7:
1317:National Register of Historic Places
242:National Register of Historic Places
233:National Register of Historic Places
221:This article is within the scope of
185:National Register of Historic Places
120:This article is within the scope of
66:It is of interest to the following
1117:Store Gulch Guard Station No. 1020
140:Knowledge:WikiProject Architecture
14:
1387:Start-Class Architecture articles
1093:Randle Ranger Station-Work Center
1045:North Fork Guard Station No. 1142
985:La Wis Wis Guard Station No. 1165
143:Template:WikiProject Architecture
1159:Water Canyon Administrative Site
208:
198:
177:
107:
97:
79:
48:
19:
1099:Rustler Park Fire Guard Station
839:, Off US 66/89 SW of Williams,
265:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1081:Pleasant Valley Ranger Station
1:
288:Cannot find material on Group
239:and see a list of open tasks.
134:and see a list of open tasks.
1033:Mondeaux Dam Recreation Area
883:Cima Park Fire Guard Station
865:Cedar Guard Station No. 1019
1153:Walnut Creek Ranger Station
1129:Supervisor's House No. 1001
877:Chatter Creek Guard Station
795:Beaver Creek Ranger Station
379:Civilian Conservation Corps
1423:
1057:Paulina Lake Guard Station
1003:Leavenworth Ranger Station
895:Copper Creek Guard Station
837:Camp Clover Ranger Station
825:Butte Falls Ranger Station
807:Big Springs Ranger Station
271:project's importance scale
162:project's importance scale
1372:21:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
1349:21:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
931:Gold Beach Ranger Station
901:Crown King Ranger Station
859:Cascade Locks Work Center
813:Breitenbush Guard Station
783:Arctic Point Fire Lookout
773:14:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
758:13:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
734:04:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
684:16:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
650:15:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
592:14:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
569:13:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
535:13:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
484:03:29, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
445:02:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
427:01:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
405:01:05, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
357:00:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
331:23:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
264:
193:
159:
92:
74:
1123:Sunflower Ranger Staiton
1009:Lick Creek Guard Station
919:Franklin Lake Campground
831:Cabin Lake Guard Station
305:09:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
123:WikiProject Architecture
1135:Sycamore Ranger Station
1075:Pinedale Ranger Station
1051:Parkdale Ranger Station
1015:Lost Lake Guard Station
955:Isabella Ranger Station
853:Carey Dome Fire Lookout
819:Brush Creek Work Center
967:Ketchikan Ranger House
889:Columbine Work Station
871:Centennial Work Center
56:This article is rated
1322:National Park Service
1165:Zigzag Ranger Station
1105:Sedona Ranger Station
1087:Portal Ranger Station
1021:Lowell Ranger Station
847:Canelo Ranger Station
146:Architecture articles
1141:Unity Ranger Station
1069:Pinal Ranger Station
1039:Moqui Ranger Station
1027:Mallard Peak Lookout
979:La Prele Work Center
973:Keystone Work Center
943:Imnaha Guard Station
925:Glide Ranger Station
801:Big Creek Commissary
754:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
516:Unity Ranger Station
460:notability criteria
115:Architecture portal
386:Architecture Group
62:content assessment
1324:. March 13, 2009.
285:
284:
281:
280:
277:
276:
172:
171:
168:
167:
42:
41:
1414:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1326:
1325:
1308:
755:
647:
642:
637:
566:
561:
556:
532:
527:
522:
492:Timberline Lodge
424:
419:
414:
354:
349:
344:
328:
323:
318:
253:
252:
249:
246:
243:
218:
213:
212:
211:
202:
195:
194:
189:
181:
174:
148:
147:
144:
141:
138:
117:
112:
111:
101:
94:
93:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1377:
1376:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1336:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1310:
1309:
1178:
753:
741:
645:
640:
635:
564:
559:
554:
530:
525:
520:
497:Linn A. Forrest
422:
417:
412:
352:
347:
342:
326:
321:
316:
290:
250:
247:
244:
241:
240:
214:
209:
207:
187:
145:
142:
139:
136:
135:
113:
106:
60:on Knowledge's
57:
12:
11:
5:
1420:
1418:
1410:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1379:
1378:
1375:
1374:
1335:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1156:
1150:
1144:
1138:
1132:
1126:
1120:
1114:
1108:
1102:
1096:
1090:
1084:
1078:
1072:
1066:
1060:
1054:
1048:
1042:
1036:
1030:
1024:
1018:
1012:
1006:
1000:
994:
988:
982:
976:
970:
964:
958:
952:
946:
940:
934:
928:
922:
916:
910:
904:
898:
892:
886:
880:
874:
868:
862:
856:
850:
844:
834:
828:
822:
816:
810:
804:
798:
792:
786:
776:
775:
740:
737:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
574:
573:
572:
571:
547:
546:
545:
544:
538:
537:
507:
506:
501:
500:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
433:
392:
391:
390:
375:
362:
361:
360:
359:
334:
333:
289:
286:
283:
282:
279:
278:
275:
274:
267:Low-importance
263:
257:
256:
254:
237:the discussion
231:listed on the
229:historic sites
220:
219:
203:
191:
190:
188:Low‑importance
182:
170:
169:
166:
165:
158:
152:
151:
149:
132:the discussion
119:
118:
102:
90:
89:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1419:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1382:
1373:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1333:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1313:
1307:
1305:
1303:
1301:
1299:
1297:
1295:
1293:
1291:
1289:
1287:
1285:
1283:
1281:
1279:
1277:
1275:
1273:
1271:
1269:
1267:
1265:
1263:
1261:
1259:
1257:
1255:
1253:
1251:
1249:
1247:
1245:
1243:
1241:
1239:
1237:
1235:
1233:
1231:
1229:
1227:
1225:
1223:
1221:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1213:
1211:
1209:
1207:
1205:
1203:
1201:
1199:
1197:
1195:
1193:
1191:
1189:
1187:
1185:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1166:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1115:
1112:
1111:Shirley Field
1109:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1007:
1004:
1001:
998:
995:
992:
989:
986:
983:
980:
977:
974:
971:
968:
965:
962:
959:
956:
953:
950:
947:
944:
941:
938:
935:
932:
929:
926:
923:
920:
917:
914:
911:
908:
905:
902:
899:
896:
893:
890:
887:
884:
881:
878:
875:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
851:
848:
845:
842:
838:
835:
832:
829:
826:
823:
820:
817:
814:
811:
808:
805:
802:
799:
796:
793:
790:
787:
784:
781:
780:
779:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:
760:
759:
756:
750:
746:
739:Database dump
738:
736:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
709:
707:
703:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
651:
648:
643:
638:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
593:
589:
585:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
570:
567:
562:
557:
551:
550:
549:
548:
542:
541:
540:
539:
536:
533:
528:
523:
517:
513:
509:
508:
503:
502:
498:
493:
488:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
463:
461:
446:
442:
438:
430:
429:
428:
425:
420:
415:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
393:
389:Blanchfield."
387:
383:
382:
380:
376:
373:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
358:
355:
350:
345:
338:
337:
336:
335:
332:
329:
324:
319:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
293:
287:
272:
268:
262:
259:
258:
255:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:
217:
206:
204:
201:
197:
196:
192:
186:
183:
180:
176:
163:
157:
154:
153:
150:
133:
129:
125:
124:
116:
110:
105:
103:
100:
96:
95:
91:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1337:
1315:
1171:
777:
744:
742:
717:
713:
710:
701:
698:
514:who started
471:
464:
457:
385:
294:
291:
266:
222:
137:Architecture
128:Architecture
121:
87:Architecture
68:WikiProjects
36:no consensus
35:
495:article on
435:quality. --
58:Start-class
1381:Categories
1172:References
470:. And the
841:Kaibab NF
716:and the
472:see also
28:deletion
1334:Regions
476:hike395
297:hike395
269:on the
765:Orlady
726:Orygun
676:Orlady
584:Orlady
512:Orygun
437:Orlady
397:Orlady
64:scale.
1341:Cbl62
372:WP:AN
1345:talk
769:talk
751:. --
730:talk
680:talk
588:talk
480:talk
441:talk
401:talk
301:talk
34:was
1363:ncr
745:not
724:.--
641:ncr
560:ncr
526:ncr
418:ncr
348:ncr
322:ncr
261:Low
156:???
1383::
1368:am
1358:do
1347:)
1320:.
1314:.
1179:^
771:)
732:)
682:)
646:am
636:do
590:)
565:am
555:do
531:am
521:do
482:)
443:)
423:am
413:do
403:)
353:am
343:do
327:am
317:do
303:)
1343:(
767:(
728:(
678:(
586:(
478:(
439:(
399:(
299:(
273:.
164:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
