Talk:Usenet personality - Knowledge (XXG)

1547:

can only guess the intentions of DMacks in wanting to delete this quiet and peaceful page of Likebox/Archimedes Plutonium so as to have only one entry of AP packed with words like "crank, crackpot, kook" I have respectfully requested a TAG be put on this page asking for senior managing-editors to review the long tortorous history of the Archimedes Plutonium entry and the combativeness of a gang of editors usually lead by DMacks. On the DMacks info page concerning DMack says that he/she attended Penn University and Brown and subjects of chemistry. When the AP page was torn down circa 2005, because the Attorney General had sent a letter to Knowledge (XXG) asking why its editors insisted on pegging Archimedes Plutonium with a false and racial slur of a nickname-- Arky, And the speed at which Knowledge (XXG) tore down the page was gratifying to me, but shortly after it was torn down, that some Knowledge (XXG) editors then located several defunct organizations to thence reinstall the Knowledge (XXG) page that the Attorney General asked to be removed. And such pages that appear on a Google Search of Archimedes Plutonium of Indopedia encyclopedia with the intention of throwing in the word "crank" of that old Knowledge (XXG) page. And then the sci.chem Uncle Al hatespam of "how stooopid is Archie Poo". So I have to ask what was the role of DMacks in the resurrection of all those old Knowledge (XXG) pages in defunct organizations such as Indopedia and of the curmudgeon Uncle Al Schwartz based in sci.chem and DMacks linked with sci.chem, so I have to ask what role does the Knowledge (XXG) editor DMacks have in the packing of websites that demonize Archimedes Plutonium? Are some editors at Knowledge (XXG) playing demonizing and harrassement of private citizens and using Knowledge (XXG) editing privileges in order to malign innocent private citizens? When will editors like DMacks and a list of others, easily found on the talk discussion pages of Usenet Celebrity-- Archimedes Plutonium? When will they be happy-- when the entry of Archimedes Plutonium reads the same as Uncle Al's "Archie Poo is stooopid, more stupid than dirt" and referenced with words of "crank, crackpot, psychoceramic, kook". So if DMacks gets his way on this Likebox/Archimedes Plutonium page which has been quiet and peaceful for 2 years now, then DMacks is well on his/her way of a full DEMONIZATION of Archimedes Plutonium. Ask DMacks a simple question-- since he studied chemistry which requires logical coherence, ask him/her why charge this peaceful and quiet page for Deletion when all the noise occurred over at the other Archimedes Plutonium page. Seems like incoherent logic on the part of DMacks. So I respectfully request that the Deletion of Likebox/Archimedes Plutonium be undone, and that Deletion process be transfered and voted on for the Archimedes Plutonium Usenet Celebrity page where the noise seems to emanate. And I respectfully request that Knowledge (XXG) have a TAG, similar to a Deletion tag that investigates whether some editors are rogue and whether they form gangs that pick on private persons of their entry in Knowledge (XXG), because ever since Knowledge (XXG) had Archimedes Plutonium some 10 years ago, the ride has felt like "pulling teeth." So can a managing editor please provide some links to a TAG that investigates a group of Knowledge (XXG) editors which I suspect are unduly harrassing Archimedes Plutonium and who want to install a "demonization entry" of Archimedes Plutonium.

1361:

that Hughes's signature block would not have Hughes's name but rather a "quote out of context" and the name of another poster who Hughes did not like. And these signature blocks would be repeated over and over again, with the upshot that a new reader could not really tell who the true author of the Hughes post was, and where quoted author was made to look bad because the out of context quote was selected by Hughes to make that person look bad. Jesse F. Hughes goes by the alias Phiwum as a Knowledge (XXG) editor and claims on his Knowledge (XXG) page "about him" that he is a college professor teaching on the East Coast in the Massachussets area. This seems rather contradictory to me, as I was often a target of Hughes's signature block and complained to News Admin Net Abuse that Hughes's was not only "quoting out of context" which no college professor that I know of would continue such practice when asked to stop that behaviour, and when such a practice verges on forgery. So it is my opinion that a entry in Knowledge (XXG) Usenet Celebrities is warranted for Jesse F. Hughes as a College Professor who sees no wrong or harm in quoting out of context a different author and inserting that quote with authors name as his signature block. It is my opinion that Hughes is ** pushing the envelope** of good and bad behaviour as it relates to quoting out of context and the name of another in his signature block which is hard to tell who was the author of Hughes post. There are hundreds of Hughes post to sci.math where names other than Hughes are in the signature block. Now I know that in Medicine there is a code of conduct, the Hypocratic Oath of do no harm to patients. But is there some College Academia Code of Conduct that professors in Colleges who commit to quoting out of context and are spinning those quotes as a hate-mill to sci.math and when asked to stop that habit and frequent pleas to News Admin Net Abuse of Hughes's signature block. Is there some Code of Conduct by Colleges that can stop Hughes from maligning other people who post to the Usenet?

1222:

coffee. Hipcrime and Serdar Argic were spammers pure and simple, Archimedes Plutonium is a depressingly maladroit and painfully unfunny wannabe Kibo clone, the Internet Oracle is a PERL script, B1FF was a pseudonym created for purposes of trolling (or, if you prefer, "Usenet performance art"), and--with the honorable exceptions of the late Gharlane of Eddore and those listed under "Other Personalities"--most of the rest of the people listed are shrill, obnoxious, obsessed cranks whose freely chosen online behavior: to wit, monomaniacal devotion to reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of various Usenet newsgroups in the 1990s, have made them unwelcome in most any online community forevermore. That is a rather odd sort of fame, in my opinion.

1594:

would be a model for others. And the second candidate is (2) LWalk and some say L. Walker going with the alias "Transfer Principle" who posts mostly in sci.math. This poster I have known for about 5 years and his ability to enter into a discussion of hatemongering other posters and to afford them respect, where most all other posters would have rather handcuffed the ruffians is a remarkable talent. LWalk is a model of a compassionate person and how one can conduct themselves on Usenet even though it is surrounded by profanity, hatred.

1198:

one paragraph, not even his own page, but a paragraph in a list of terrorists of Rome, while giving Roman Geshnortz 4 or 5 pages (Dr. Tao, Dr. Wiles for fake math), and Romania Geshnortz 4 or 5 pages because she wants to be famous for "wanting to be famous as a blonde airhead". We can well understand Knowledge (XXG) editors are running around to look for airheads to give them 4 or 5 pages, but the point of Knowledge (XXG) is to evaluate "worthy news". AP, the King of Science needs his own separate page in Knowledge (XXG).

312: 291: 1634:(XXG) because of the false racial slur of a nickname "Arky" that the Knowledge (XXG) editors were trying to saddle AP with. So the AP site was torn down for it was commented by outside observers that the AP site was mostly a mockfest with racial slurs and works like "crank", "crackpot", "psychoceramics". Because it was torn down, and rapidly removed, Loadmaster-- David Tribble created this new site now called Usenet Celebrities in response to the AP removal. 1638:

still seen in the references cited. But worst of all, is that all the other persons listed in this site are afforded webpages, or archives or specific Usenet posts as citations, but AP is not allowed or afforded that same respect. Having watched this Knowledge (XXG) site for years now, it is my opinion that if DMacks were in charge that the entry of Archimedes Plutonium would read like this: AP is a crackpot, a crank, a psychoceramic.

532: 409: 1450:

had me as a fired dishwasher and had my clothes all written on. A truly genuine total mockfest, and the straw that broke my back was when these editors around 2005 insisted I be saddled with a false nickname of Arky. So I called for the Attorney General to inquire into Knowledge (XXG) circa 2005 and my entry was dropped immediately. But up sprang new entries of Archimedes Plutonium which we see two of them today.

1324:

newsgroups, both particularly ubiquitous and obnoxious for long periods at various times. There was also another guy, whose name I've possibly forgotten (Philip Stromer, maybe?), who posted extremely offensive and homophobic material to rec.sport.pro-wrestling for quite some time. Once he started posting the same sort of material to other, better-read newsgroups, he found himself fired by Sun for it.

221: 203: 172: 2513: 1905: 32: 1458:

question. And so, I respectfully request that private citizens who are featured with an entry in Knowledge (XXG) be allowed to post a TAG on a entry which that tag requires a higher level managing editor to investigate whether a gang of editor bullies is harrassing that private citizen. I lost a lot of time in having the Attorney General remove a racial slur of a nickname.

2745:

Usenet and in fact every public forum on Earth for at least two decades now. And even if you don't see how these nazi sociopaths and their actions are killing all life and intelligence on this planet, this and similar articles have just no reason on Earth to exist on Knowledge (XXG) and should be immediately *deleted*, plus excuses offered to all parties unduly involved.

1454:

individual or "gang of editors" at Knowledge (XXG) is beating up unfairly on this private individual. It is unrealistic that a person featured in Knowledge (XXG) with a false and racial slur of a nickname of Arky has to spend oodles of time and contacting the Attorney General, because a gang of editors of Knowledge (XXG) find it fun to harass private individuals.

1294:"Celebrity" here is indeed generally rather kook-centric, because those are the ones sufficiently annoying to warrant the typing to get them added. "A Hall of Fame" rightly ought to find room for the likes of Gerry Hurst, John DeArmond and Jukka Korpela, but that's not what this is. Norman Yarvin deserves a place under "History of Wikis" for his Yarchive project. 79: 2012: 1136: 775: 2690:

Archimedes Plutonium has become a spamming endeavour pasting minor edits of the same posts again and again, clogging newsgroups such as sci.physics and sci.math, and recently unrelated newsgroups. Time has long past that he posts theories of some sort, his genere is now literary pests. Latest example by Archimedes Plutonium:

231: 2943:

is minimal. Indeed, the talk page has a notice explaining that the article exists to aggregate users with some coverage but not enough for an article. I don't think Usenet is unique enough to justify a non-list article about one of its user-types anyhow; at least, nothing that wouldn't be merged into

2373:

I am trying to get down to the bone what bugs me. I understand the sarcastic connotation of usenet celebrity, especially since it uses the special term usenet and not internet. But since today we have real internet celebrities, such as youtube vlogers etc.. and not fake ones as these cranks, it might

1633:

It is easily seen from the discussion history of this site and from the older sites of Archimedes Plutonium that he is treated unfairly. This site Usenet Celebrities was created because of the need to cover AP whose site was torn down circa 2005 due to a Attorney General letter enquiry into Knowledge

1233:

Did someone come in here from AUK and try to post a list of Usenet kooks? And then someone else was afraid of a lawsuit, I'm just guessing here, and rather than delete the article, renamed it "Usenet celebrities" and added Kibo and John Baez in an attempt to prevent Valery Fabrikant from suing Jimbo

1225:

And if that's the kind of "fame" you're talking about, then your list is missing Richard Bullis, Edmond Wollmann, Tim "Three Fucking Weeks" Thorne, Bruce Daniel Kettler, John Martin Grubor, Jerry M. "Dr. Richard X. Frager" "Art Wholeflaffer" Kolnick, Dave Tholen, Viv "Fucknozzle Jr." Eshwar, Doctress

1197:

It is time for Archimedes Plutonium, King of Science, to have his own separate Knowledge (XXG) page, considering he has published 128 science books in less than 2 years. For according to AP, that if Knowledge (XXG) had existed in 1st century AD, that Knowledge (XXG) would have given Jesus Christ just

1677:

And in my opinion,the reason that criminals and MI5 appears in Usenet Celebrities is that the entire site is just a negative backdrop to what DMacks, David Tribble and other Knowledge (XXG) editors wish to paint the picture of Archimedes Plutonium as a demon devil. Mind you, they may not be doing it

1546:

DMacks has it all wrong with the accusation and charge of "magnet for edits". This page of Likebox/Archimedes Plutonium has been a quiet and peaceful page. The page that needs consideration for Deletion is the Usenet Celebrity entry of Archimedes Plutonium where that entry is a magnet for edits. One

67:

should include a brief explanantion about why that person is notable. The entries are divided into "Eccentric" and "Other/unusual" categories. More categories may be added in the future (e.g., "Humorous", "Religious", etc.). For the archives of this talk page, see the Archive box to the right of the

1593:

So I nominate two posters that I think show the best in what a Usenet poster can be. (1) Her name was Henrietta in the 1990s and I believe she went on to be the head of her own newsgroup in the law and lawyer news groups. Her posts showed a woman of extreme compassion and intelligence and her posts

1585:

Also, I challenge the category that has criminals and mental issues, since it probably reflects more on the mental state of the authors and editors who created this page than it reflects on the Usenet community at large. For instance the largest entry is that of a mental case of MI5. Is that really

1360:

Jesse F. Hughes devised a unique trick in his sci.math postings by making his signature block for sci.math contain "quotes out of context" by various other sci.math particpants. And the Hughes trick was to hunt through posts of others looking for a sentence that would make that poster look bad. So

1319:

The term has been around since at least the mid-to-late 1990s, mostly on account of the efforts made by Joel Furr and a few others who preceded him to chronicle such persons. Since Usenet as it was known then didn't survive the transition to today's Internet very well, some historical details were

2472:

I Archimedes Plutonium, thinks that Jan Burse, in my opinion, ought to be put into a Swiss jail or prison as a one man crusader who is anxious to tear down every web site that deals with Archimedes Plutonium. Jan Burse in my opinion is a hatemonger of anything that deals with Archimedes Plutonium.

1461:

So Please, provide a Tag that investigates whether there is a gang of editors at Knowledge (XXG) that find it pleasurable to harrass people featured and where I can type in the names of a few editors who seem to stalk and keep an inordinate eye on every move made of the Archimedes Plutonium entry.

1449:

I have had troubles with the Knowledge (XXG) entry of Archimedes Plutonium ever since the first entry appeared almost 10 or more years ago which one editor described as a "mockfest". Entrees that contained the words or cited to words of "kook", "crank", "crackpot", and had me living in Montana and

1391:

Can you provide a published citation to back up any of this, or a reference to any discussions (outside of the newsgroups themselves or any self-published personal web pages) that shows that Hughes is widely known specifically for his newsgroup postings and/or sig blocks? If not, then he does meet

2719:

Its a pitty that Knowledge (XXG) gives an additional platform to such trolls, by giving them a honorable mention. Its strange how many people have fallen for this troll and still fall for this troll. Maybe he symbolized some freedom of speech in the past, but after all these years what remains is

2700:

Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston,

1641:

But since Loadmaster is the editor in charge of this site, AP's entry has the words crank crackpot and psychoceramic not listed directly but indirectly in the references. It is my opinion that the reason AP is never afforded the same citations of webpage, archives or Usenet posts is because, then

2744:

These and similar articles are a true disgrace and a pure infamy: not just *totally biased and unfair*, these are in fact the acts of the very self-appointed bullies and psychos who are actually responsible for the demise of Usenet, systematically offending, provoking, libelling and spamming the

1637:

Now comes the analysis of why Archimedes Plutonium is severely prejudiced by this site. At first Loadmaster sandwiched AP in between criminals listed and it took AP several months to rectify that problem. Much of the harsh words of "crank, crackpot, psychoceramics" were not removed for they are

1221:

To the extent that anyone listed could be a "celebrity" in the usual sense of the word for reasons pertaining to Usenet posts, the only one on the whole list would have to be Kibo, and I wouldn't swear in a court of law that his twenty years of mildly amusing Usenet posts would get him a cup of

2689:

Maybe the wikipedia article is problematic, since it lists as criminal behaviour "newsgroup trolling activities.". This should be possibly removed. Without this removal, in my opinion, Archimedes Plutonium clearly falls in this category. What started as a charming alternative theory venture by

1453:

But my Request is that I would like to know if Knowledge (XXG) has a Editor Tag? A tag not unlike the "call for deletion tag". Only the editor tag is a tag in which private citizens who are displayed in Knowledge (XXG) can ask for a higher level editor of Knowledge (XXG) to look into whether a

1323:

Now, on another topic real quick - soc.motss was one of the major newsgroups back when I read newsgroups. With such a large and strong community on the net, of course homophobes would spring up. Any notability there to speak of? I remember Ted Kaldis and Daniel Karnes on alt.flame and other

46:

personalities. In some cases, these individuals are notable enough to warrant having their own WP article, in which case this page should contain links to those articles. In other cases, the individual is not notable enough to warrant their own biographical article, in which case this page may

2777:

The criteria on wikipedia is whether the person is notable, i.e. has been noted. We have articles on really serious criminals, because they have been noted. It is perfectly reasonable that we have this article, so if you delete it, someone will restore it and you may be banned from wikipedia.

1457:

A case in point is that the editor DMacks is charging Archimedes Plutonium for disruption of entrees, but that DMacks has placed a Deletion tag not on the entry I have been reverting but rather, DMacks has taken it upon himself (herself) to tag for deletion a different page which was never in

692:

tag on it, so I could rename /Archive to /Archive 1, but then it occurred to me that if I just edit the redirect to /Archive, a positive result would be achieved. I notice that by doing all this, both archives have wound up in the {{talkheader}} template. If you'd like to get the /Archive 1

2261:

It's cited by multiple independent sources, which is the wikipedia standard. He may well be annoying and insulting (in your opinion or in wider-established group consensus), he may have various reasons for behaving as he does (but we're not allowed to use our speculations as any basis for

1597:

So I think Knowledge (XXG) should revise Usenet Celebrities far beyond what it currently is. It's current presentation is of a negative overtone that is not representative of the bigger picture that Usenet is composed mostly of good people, whose posts are valuable to read and learn.

1237:

There's nothing and no one notable here, nay, not one. If you're going to put up a list of Usenet cranks do so, but don't sugar-coat it by pretending it's something else. This article is neither encyclopedic nor worthy of the bytes it occupies. Where do I go to suggest deletion?

2862:

pps: I'm guessing, based on receiving similar emails back during the period I was actively editing the FAQ, that the topic above mine about "offense and obscenity", which I also note seems to have no identity associated with it here, is from one of the folks mentioned on the page

2659:

He is clearly clogging a lot of newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.math, and recently comp.lang.prolog. I wouldn't know that his Atomic theory has anything to do with comp.lang.prolog. So he shows signs of trolling behaviour, moving his spamming feud to other newsgroups.

2243:

His false status as a crank or even usenet celebrity helps him maintain his spam in sci.math, and attracts other similar spammers like John Gabriel, Bassam King Karzeddin, etc.. These other spammers then produce less camouflaged hate speech, including Eugenics etc..

1586:

appropriate? And the issue of a murderer who may have posted a few times to the Usenet, and thus the appropriateness of such an entry. And what is the standard for that? Are we to see murderers and criminals who made a few posts as filling up this site?

1229:

In all seriousness, I don't grasp what this article is about or what these people have in common. Kibo got a TV commercial or two fifteen years ago. No one else on the list got that much fame, for good or ill. I don't get it, guys. I don't get it.

1796:? I would think that publishing papers in peer-reviewed theoretical physics journals, and possibly getting paid to do such practicing, would be more of a requirement for determining who can rightfully be called a TP. Ditto for being called a " 2288:

is not about Archimedes Plutonium. Archimedes Plutonium is only mentioned in one paragraph in passing but the article is about another phenomenom in general. The article also doesn't say that he is a "usenet celebrity". The second reference

427: 109: 2344:

None of the subjects in this article qualify as "celebrity". That doesn't mean we should exclude them; rather, it means the article title should be corrected to something more accurate, such as "notorious people on usenet" or some such.

2701:

Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse"."

740:

Exactly, and tricky enough that I haven't found how to do it without the help of an admin. Apparently one has to tag the redirect page (/Archive 1) for speedy deletion, and then once it's deleted, the /Archive can be moved to that

2293:

is also not about Archimedes Plutonium. Again Archimedes Plutonium is this time only mentioned in two sentences in passing but the article is about another phenomenom in general. The article also doesn't say that he is a "usenet

1418:

Jesse F. Hughes is a valued contributor to sci.math. His sig often contains attributed quotations. Only a steaming idiot would think that the body of the post came from the person to whom the quotation is (rightly) attributed.

605:

page. However only one of these, the second one, is linked to at the top of this page. The other one, that is, the first one, is linked to in the blue explanation box. Does this need to be addressed or repaired?

2846:

ps: I can't imagine why Knowledge (XXG) would have experienced problems with links to faqs!org, but I've spaced it out above so it's not a direct link. If anyone wants to go look, it's there since I think 1995.

1589:

The site is sorely lacking great and good posters which I think, and most people would agree that the majority of posters to Usenet are good people, but we find it hard to see that in what this site now shows.

744:

I also noticed that the dates in the archives are, for Archive 1, 27-28 Sep 2007, and for Archive 2, 1 Jan-24 Apr 2009. Are there archives for the gap between Sep 2007 and Jan 2009? and are they retrievable?

99: 688:

I think I've fixed the archives without having to bother an admin, Loadmaster. I renamed /Archive 1 to /Archive 2, and that converted /Archive 1 to a redirect page. I thought about placing a

2867: 2848: 726:

page instead of a redirect. But renaming pages over existing pages can be tricky (I've done it before, but don't remember the details), so perhaps asking an admin would be more effective. —

965:. This archive is actually the discussion page of Archimedes Plutonium. It is not a true archive of Talk:Usenet celebrity. This is so noted in a {{tmbox}} template at the top of the page. 660:

Okay, I've added the old archive, named "/Archive", to the box temporarily until I figure out how to fix it properly. I also repositioned the archive box to the right of the TOC, as per

1226:

Neutopia, Erik "Erik Mouse" McDarby, Emmett Earl Gulley, Brad Jessness, Alexa Cameron, Tim "Skidmark" Brown, the late Earl Gordon Curley, and... well, I could go on and on, couldn't I?

1650:

the editor in charge of this site (sic). There is no such thing on Knowledge (XXG). Any editor may contribute content to existing articles, as per the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines (see

980:

In looking over the history of this page and the dates on this page, these are evidently the only archives. No other archives exist as yet. I clarified this in the archive box.

1179:. It includes posts from some of the personalities listed in this article, including Archimedes Plutonium, Jack Sarfatti, and Alexander Abian. (It is also available as a link from 151: 2966:. It's something more than just a pure list, and without a separate non-list article I see no benefit to a longer title when the shorter one would just redirect back here anyway. 1291:

discourages the use of neologisms, WP's reaction is to create its own painfully contrived one, just to avoid using whatever post-Shakespearean term is already in use elsewhere.

496: 362: 1707:

article. Everything in it is factual, and is even supported with citation. If you believe it to be inaccurate, please discuss how it could be improved in a civil manner (see

1543:

To keep the Likebox/Archimedes Plutonium page because it is objective and quiet and peacefull. It is this entry of AP that is noisy and a combative zone of AP with editors.

2816:

the net.legends FAQ three decades ago now. it's still there in the Usenet FAQ-posting mechanism, it's just turned off, < http:// www.faqs.org/faqs/net-legends-faq/ : -->

2239:

I don't think Archimedes Plutonium is notable. We might call him a "fake crank". He mainly uses his pseudo theories to anoy and insult people, which is obvious from here:

2316:

Some more question, where, in terms of references, do you get the biographic data from? Things like the born name etc..? Shouldn't you put a reference? Was it from here:

3068: 1582:

The current Usenet Celebrities is too much of a overall negative tone, as if good people and good posters do not exist in Usenet and this is an attempt to address that.

458: 352: 2262:

encyclopedia editorial content decisions), and others may follow him to behave the same or worse (again, we can't use our own analysis of causes of behavior). Instead,

2183: 2179: 2165: 156: 3073: 3063: 445: 1701:

Well that's just false. As far as anyone but you can discern, there is nothing derogatory or negative about the description of Archimedes Plutonium (you) in the

328: 472: 441: 3048: 840:

Where did they go? Did they get offloaded into an archive page that is misplaced/misnamed/deleted, or were they just manually deleted from an existing page?

2489: 2474: 1199: 1123:

Can this article and talk page be unprotected now so that unregistered users can edit and make comments? We can quickly restore protection if necessary. --

483: 139:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 249: 131: 319: 296: 812:

Thank you very much, DMacks! I had just gone to tag the redirect for SD. Big red letters came up informing that the page had just been deleted.

3058: 3053: 253: 1103:

That is a very good question! Why do "editors" continually spend their time removing content from Knowledge (XXG)? The world may never know.

2091:

and notability/inclusion guideline for this type of article. Subjects who have come to the public light do not get to control their content.

1748:: having a PhD doesn't make you a theoretical physicist. You're a TP if you actually practice it, not if you studied it briefly years ago. 1493: 434: 2899:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

1652: 248:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 2793: 1852: 1823: 1463: 1420: 1376: 1362: 693:

redirect page deleted, and then rename /Archive to /Archive 1, I'll leave that up to you, or if you'd like me to do it, let me know.

2749: 1679: 1599: 1548: 1245: 257: 2871: 2852: 1263:

is the place for that formal deletion-discussion. It's already been there twice, and most recently there had a was consensus that it

244: 208: 562: 556: 550: 1709: 1539:

Respectfully Request the Nomination for Deletion Tag over at Likebox/Archimedes Plutonium be moved over here to AP/Usenet Celebrity

1822:

I thought John Grubor and Steve Boursy were more well known than some of the guys listed in this article, shouldn't they belong?

57:

policy, and must not become a magnet for inflammatory attacks on Usenet users (or WP editors, for that matter). Tone must remain

1503: 2493: 2478: 1340: 1203: 452: 421: 183: 2840:

If you'd like to reference it here, feel free, please. It feels very weird to me to see such a page with zero mention of it?

2143: 1760: 2748:

PLEASE DELETE THIS OBSENITY AND OFFENCE TO ALL DECENCY. If nobody will, I will do it myself in exactly 48 hours from now.

3035:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

791: 783: 594: 1485:

That's not how Knowledge (XXG) works. Please familiarize yourself with some of the relevant policies of Knowledge (XXG):

2070:

This entry is factually inaccurate and that is the reason that it has been professionally removed from Knowledge (XXG).

2890: 2720:

just trolling couched in an academic format. His fan club must really ask themselves who and what they are worshipping.

85: 2488:

It is high time for a separate page of Archimedes Plutonium with his 127 published books of science in Amazon Kindle.

1986: 1884: 1498: 954: 935: 795: 787: 638: 632: 602: 3014:. Just because an article aggregates information, doesn't mean we have to name it "List of...". It is unnecessary. ~ 1271:

backing it up. Crazy, eh? There are links to those two in one of the yellowish boxes at the top of this talk-page.

661: 2519: 2317: 1911: 1508: 140: 3078: 1756: 1295: 1088: 990: 903: 874: 855: 835:

PS. I wonder... is there any way the archive(s) between the date gaps of Sep 2007 and Jan 2009 can be retrieved?

822: 755: 703: 673: 616: 2182:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

573: 2900: 189: 171: 2797: 1856: 1827: 1467: 1424: 1380: 1366: 2710: 2639: 2545: 2392:

Perhaps "Usenet personality" - the alternate title, given in the introductory sentence - would be better. -

1683: 1603: 2284:

It is possible to delete when the references are not the right references. For example the first reference

1872: 1689: 1609: 1558: 1473: 1393: 1372: 1328: 1241: 58: 2768: 2753: 2613: 2557: 2397: 1775: 1552: 1303: 1249: 1124: 1658: 54: 3020: 2588: 2423: 2351: 2221: 2201:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2189: 1678:

intentionally but subconsciously they hate AP so much that they do not know themselves of what they do.

950: 931: 327:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1715: 1656:). The actual content of the articles is derived through a process of collaboration and consensus (see 1078:

to this article at some point. Although if interested, you might check with that editor to be sure.

2375: 311: 290: 2630: 2605: 2523: 2046: 1996: 1915: 1805: 1789: 1724: 1667: 1520: 1405: 1188: 1080: 1026: 982: 895: 866: 814: 747: 731: 695: 665: 647: 608: 150:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 2963: 2073: 553:- Sep 27-28, 2007, archived by an editor who thought the discussion inappropriate for this talk page 78: 2998: 2453:

by Eric Francis. There's a short chapter on Archimedes Plutonium with some biographical details. -

2077: 2026: 1793: 1336: 1053: 864:

an actual "Derek Smart" discussion page, nor even a user page. Do these entries look promising?

2903:

after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1445:

Respectfully Request from a Managing Editor of Knowledge (XXG) unfamilar with Archimedes Plutonium

3011: 2984: 2971: 2930: 2729: 2665: 2575: 2549: 2383: 2327: 2301: 2251: 1842: 1014: 579: 154:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 2186:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1992:

template, which is used to sort redirects into one or more categories. Thank you in advance! –

1876: 1488: 1397: 1070:

article. After that the history just shows the fixing of double-redirects to point directly to

147: 2202: 1770:

So you claim that Archimedes Pu is, but Jack Sarfatti isn't? There's a whole load of sense...

2920: 2764: 2624: 2609: 2569: 2553: 2458: 2408: 2393: 2290: 2125: 1771: 1299: 1108: 2414: 2263: 1945: 465: 3015: 2987:. Otherwise, current title is correct since this is all we got ... until someone adds more. 2949: 2634: 2600: 2583: 2579: 2418: 2346: 2271: 2217: 2115: 2096: 1703: 1316:

What is a "Usenet celebrity?" I never saw the term outside of the Knowledge (XXG) article.

1276: 1218:

What is a "Usenet celebrity?" I never saw the term outside of the Knowledge (XXG) article.

1150: 1018: 845: 803: 575: 531: 236: 2209: 1288: 1260: 2866:--Dave, which just goes to show that categories of net behavior do, in fact, never change 2783: 2679: 2144:

https://web.archive.org/20071223022949/http://www.geocities.com:80/benny_patrick/post.html

2133: 1880: 1837:

I think they would qualify. If you can find a good source(s), go ahead and add them. --

1801: 1720: 1663: 1516: 1401: 1184: 1022: 727: 643: 559:- Jan-Apr, 2009, moved from the talk page of a Usenet celebrity to preserve the discussion 2608:

is. That's what I tried posting the edit request on, but it redirected the request here.

1268: 17: 2374:

be a misleading article name by now. I am also studying ethymological "sources" such as

1298:

can dig his own bunker. Surely though you're not suggesting adding coverage of RtS? 8-)

42:

The goal of creating this article is to provide a place for a list of all the "notable"

2988: 2240: 2168:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2036: 2019: 1332: 1168: 1049: 689: 408: 2208:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2175: 2088: 3042: 2967: 2725: 2661: 2379: 2323: 2297: 2247: 1838: 1797: 1753: 1739: 943: 1578:

New Category called "Models of Good Behaviour of Usenet Posting" and two nominations

854:

Well, I plugged "Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 3" into a Search, and I came up with

2916: 2812:... you know, this page, or something very like it in the future, was one reason I 2454: 2147: 1629:

Unfair and prejudicial treatment of Archimedes Plutonium by Knowledge (XXG) editors

1104: 324: 1267:

a viable encyclopedic topic with some sort of defined criteria for inclusion with

2285: 2945: 2267: 2092: 1272: 1146: 962: 890: 841: 799: 2833: 2318:

http://soc.history.narkive.com/mMbmYyWE/wikipedia-entry-of-archimedes-plutonium

220: 202: 2779: 2675: 2655:

Archimedes Plutonium should be moved to "Criminal and eccentric personalities"

2266:

means we take a step back and use what the refs say even if we don't like it.

2174:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1971:

WHEN YOU COPY & PASTE, PLEASE LEAVE THE MIDDLE LINE BLANK FOR READABILITY.

1145:

Thanks for cleaning up the tags. My network connections keep dropping today:(

577: 226: 893:

article, and these, Archives 1-6, appear to be archives of that talk page.

3025: 3002: 2975: 2953: 2924: 2875: 2856: 2823: 2818: 2801: 2787: 2772: 2757: 2733: 2683: 2669: 2644: 2617: 2593: 2561: 2497: 2482: 2462: 2428: 2401: 2387: 2356: 2331: 2305: 2275: 2255: 2229: 2100: 2081: 2054: 2030: 2004: 1888: 1860: 1846: 1831: 1809: 1779: 1764: 1728: 1693: 1671: 1613: 1562: 1524: 1477: 1428: 1409: 1384: 1344: 1307: 1280: 1253: 1207: 1192: 1154: 1127: 1112: 1096: 1030: 998: 911: 882: 849: 830: 807: 763: 735: 711: 681: 651: 624: 88:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: 2740:

This article is an offence and obscenity that should be immediately deleted

1642:

Loadmaster cannot pelt or pommel AP with crank, crackpot or psychoceramic.

1176: 593:

I noted when I renamed the article and discussion pages that there is the

3010:. If renamed as proposed, there would be no standalone topic article for 2711:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.prolog/c/V8jXGy7iQlk/m/bhEd0SB1AAAJ

1686:) Volcano Electricity-- our energy future to make fossil fuels obsolete 2130:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

1851:

There was a good Boston Globe article about Boursy but I can't find it.

1719:). Making false accusations and insults will not accomplish anything. — 1021:

when there's no mention of him on the page, or even in this talk page?

487: 64: 490:

to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}

43: 2828: 2376:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet%20Celebrity

1948:(redirect category templates) added. Please modify it as follows: 256:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 2633:. If you run across any others similarly protected, let me know. ~ 2582:(which is now a redirect) are protected in any way from editing. ~ 2138:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

2548:

and trying to get uneditable redirects fixed (in this case, to

2507: 1899: 1752:

is all very well; if there is a source for that it belongs at

580: 525: 165: 146:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

123: 73: 26: 1398:

Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate repository of trivia

2153:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2320:? Just wondering what makes up the content of the AP entry. 2291:

http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm

1964:#REDIRECT ] {{Redr|to list entry|unprintworthy|protected}} 1396:

guidelines for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG). Remember that

1074:. My guess would be that editor Dbachmann intends to add 630:

They probably both need to be linked, and also renamed as

2574:

I don't understand, what exactly is the problem? Neither

1555:)Private Citizen who has followed this drama for years. 1062:

that editor decided to create it to REDIRECT the page to

782:

I "reversed the redirect", renaming the actual page from

2114:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

1234:

Wales from his padded cell for character assassination?

2935: 2119: 1939: 1868:

Others who may belong: "Dr." Jai Maharaj, Dan Gannon.

1746: 1623: 1572: 1533: 1439: 1350: 1287:

It seems to be typical of Knowledge (XXG) that because

1180: 1058: 1044: 1038: 958: 939: 397: 392: 387: 382: 2629:

Ah, thanks for the explanation, I get it now. I fixed

642:(in chronological order obviously) for consistency. — 2241:

http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=2832666

858:. I find it fascinating that there doesn't seem to 497:

Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

323:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2843:--David DeLaney, currently dbdatvic {at} gmail.com 2178:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2087:It appears to have multiple citations, meeting the 2983:, unless there's some plan to write an article at 2067:This has been done on request from David D'Amato. 1183:.) It is interesting, if not amusing, reading. — 459:Category:Internet culture articles needing images 2939:– The actual content on what such a personality 2697:"Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper 2148:http://www.geocities.com/benny_patrick/post.html 2832:(Italian page), as well as Tim Skirvin's < 2286:http://discovermagazine.com/2002/apr/featnotes 2164:This message was posted before February 2018. 2817:; mirrors exist at, among other places, < 8: 2834:http://wiki.killfile.org/mirror/net.legends/ 428:View all requested internet culture articles 337:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet culture 1494:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not 484:Category:Internet self-classification codes 169: 2889:The following is a closed discussion of a 1750:I believe he used to be a lecturer at UCSD 1653:Knowledge (XXG):Who writes Knowledge (XXG) 416:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 370: 285: 197: 2824:http://www.barkingduck.net/ehayes/essays/ 2819:https://hack.org/mc/texts/net-legends.txt 2792:Sounds like you are a crank on the list. 3069:Low-importance Internet culture articles 2504:Protected edit request on 12 April 2017 1489:Knowledge (XXG):What is Knowledge (XXG) 287: 199: 63:Each entry for a notable individual or 47:provide the only place to mention him. 2449:The biographic data can be sourced to 2235:Archimedes Plutonium should be removed 1356:Nomination for a Jesse F. Hughes entry 3074:WikiProject Internet culture articles 3064:Start-Class Internet culture articles 2868:2601:840:4380:2DF:ADB0:D4A2:A34B:5A6E 2849:2601:840:4380:2DF:ADB0:D4A2:A34B:5A6E 340:Template:WikiProject Internet culture 266:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography 7: 2908:The result of the move request was: 1710:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines 317:This article is within the scope of 242:This article is within the scope of 3049:Biography articles of living people 2417:moved the article to a new title. ~ 1504:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) 374:WikiProject Internet culture To-do: 188:It is of interest to the following 2674:Eccentric - Yes. Criminal - No. -- 25: 2118:. Please take a moment to review 1036:According to the Redirect page's 3031:The discussion above is closed. 2829:https://www.linux.it/~md/usenet/ 2511: 2010: 1903: 1134: 773: 718:By all means, dive in. Ideally, 530: 407: 310: 289: 229: 219: 201: 170: 129:This article must adhere to the 77: 30: 2882:Requested move 17 November 2023 1175:over the years is available at 796:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 1 788:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 1 639:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 2 633:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 1 603:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 1 357:This article has been rated as 84:This article was nominated for 3059:WikiProject Biography articles 3054:Start-Class biography articles 2802:09:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC) 1499:Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy 1345:01:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 790:and leaving behind a redirect 722:should be a rename of the old 269:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 3026:21:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC) 3003:18:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC) 2976:19:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 2954:04:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 2925:08:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC) 2413:Excellent suggestion. I have 1818:What about Grubor and Boursy? 1509:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 1369:)Concerned Reader of Usenet 1308:01:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 1281:00:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 1254:00:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 1155:17:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1128:20:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 1113:06:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 792:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 784:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 595:Talk:Usenet celebrity/Archive 331:and see a list of open tasks. 132:biographies of living persons 2936:List of Usenet personalities 2230:19:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 1936:A redirect to this article, 1896:Edit request – 17 March 2014 1810:06:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1780:23:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 1765:19:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 1729:06:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1694:04:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 1672:06:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1614:03:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 1563:23:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1525:05:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 1478:19:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1429:13:52, 26 October 2013 (UTC) 1410:06:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1385:18:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1163:Collection of sci.math posts 1064:Notable Usenet personalities 320:WikiProject Internet culture 254:contribute to the discussion 2876:00:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC) 2857:00:05, 14 August 2023 (UTC) 2538:to reactivate your request. 2526:has been answered. Set the 1930:to reactivate your request. 1918:has been answered. Set the 1208:03:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC) 144:must be removed immediately 3095: 2645:19:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC) 2618:21:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC) 2594:21:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC) 2562:21:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC) 2498:20:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC) 2483:05:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC) 2429:19:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC) 2402:18:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC) 2195:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2136:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 2111:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2055:20:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC) 2031:20:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC) 2005:19:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC) 1394:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 662:Help:Archiving a talk page 363:project's importance scale 2463:15:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 2388:15:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 2357:15:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 2332:14:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 2306:14:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 2276:14:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 2256:13:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 2101:18:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC) 2082:10:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC) 1889:07:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC) 1847:17:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 1832:15:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 1659:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus 1470:) Thanks for such a tag 1320:bound to have been lost. 1097:19:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 1066:, an older name for this 1031:16:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 856:Talk:Derek Smart/Archive5 369: 356: 343:Internet culture articles 305: 214: 196: 55:Knowledge (XXG):Biography 18:Talk:Archimedes Plutonium 3033:Please do not modify it. 2896:Please do not modify it. 2827:in four parts, and < 2788:22:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 2773:12:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 2758:10:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 2734:13:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 2684:09:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 2670:08:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 2063:Removal of David D’Amato 1716:Knowledge (XXG):Civility 1193:04:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC) 999:00:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 912:20:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 883:19:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 850:18:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 831:18:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 808:17:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 764:17:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 736:16:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 712:06:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 682:05:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 652:16:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 625:08:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 98:, 5 September 2007, see 2546:Special:DoubleRedirects 2107:External links modified 1861:22:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 889:No, wait. I found the 565:- Jun, 2007 - Jun, 2009 49:Note that this article 2763:"similar articles"? - 471:All stubs are located 178:This article is rated 2490:2600:387:B:5:0:0:0:54 2475:2600:387:B:5:0:0:0:8B 2451:The Dartmouth Murders 1200:2600:387:B:5:0:0:0:7A 951:Talk:Usenet celebrity 932:Talk:Usenet celebrity 440:Pick an article from 245:WikiProject Biography 182:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 108:, 30 April 2009, see 2631:Archimedes Plutonium 2606:Archimedes Plutonium 2524:Archimedes Plutonium 2176:regular verification 2161:to let others know. 2122:. If necessary, add 2089:Verifiability policy 1982:is an alias for the 1940:Archimedes Plutonium 1916:Archimedes Plutonium 1790:Archimedes Plutonium 1788:Are you saying that 1757:William M. Connolley 2962:as unnecessary per 2913:(non-admin closure) 2166:After February 2018 2157:parameter below to 1794:theoretical physics 1606:)Superdeterminism 3012:usenet personality 2985:Usenet personality 2944:something under . 2931:Usenet personality 2576:Usenet personality 2550:Usenet personality 2171:InternetArchiveBot 1987:This is a redirect 1177:www.math-atlas.org 961:on 27 Mar 2009 by 957:originated as per 949:Second archive of 942:on 28 Sep 2007 by 938:originated as per 272:biography articles 184:content assessment 68:Table of Contents. 3024: 2914: 2643: 2592: 2578:or the old title 2542: 2541: 2427: 2355: 2228: 2196: 2051: 2001: 1972: 1934: 1933: 1892: 1875:comment added by 1736: 1735: 1622: 1621: 1571: 1570: 1532: 1531: 1438: 1437: 1375:comment added by 1348: 1331:comment added by 1244:comment added by 1095: 997: 930:First archive of 910: 881: 829: 762: 710: 680: 623: 586: 585: 524: 523: 520: 519: 516: 515: 512: 511: 508: 507: 486:(!?); Try to get 284: 283: 280: 279: 164: 163: 122: 121: 118: 117: 72: 71: 16:(Redirected from 3086: 3079:Internet culture 3018: 2995: 2938: 2912: 2898: 2637: 2628: 2604: 2586: 2580:Usenet celebrity 2573: 2533: 2529: 2515: 2514: 2508: 2421: 2412: 2349: 2224: 2223:Talk to my owner 2219: 2194: 2193: 2172: 2137: 2129: 2116:Usenet celebrity 2049: 2045: 2039: 2022: 2014: 2013: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1985: 1974: 1970: 1942: 1925: 1921: 1907: 1906: 1900: 1891: 1869: 1704:Usenet celebrity 1697: 1624: 1617: 1573: 1566: 1534: 1481: 1440: 1387: 1351: 1347: 1325: 1256: 1174: 1167:A collection of 1142: 1138: 1137: 1093: 1085: 1079: 1072:Usenet celebrity 1068:Usenet celebrity 1061: 1047: 1041: 1019:Usenet celebrity 995: 987: 981: 908: 900: 894: 879: 871: 865: 827: 819: 813: 781: 777: 776: 760: 752: 746: 708: 700: 694: 678: 670: 664: 621: 613: 607: 581: 534: 526: 422:Article requests 411: 404: 403: 371: 345: 344: 341: 338: 335: 334:Internet culture 325:internet culture 314: 307: 306: 301: 297:Internet culture 293: 286: 274: 273: 270: 267: 264: 250:join the project 239: 237:Biography portal 234: 233: 232: 223: 216: 215: 205: 198: 181: 175: 174: 166: 152:this noticeboard 124: 90: 89: 81: 74: 34: 33: 27: 21: 3094: 3093: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 2989: 2934: 2894: 2884: 2810: 2808:net.legends FAQ 2742: 2657: 2622: 2598: 2567: 2531: 2527: 2512: 2506: 2406: 2237: 2227: 2222: 2187: 2180:have permission 2170: 2131: 2123: 2109: 2065: 2048:Paine Ellsworth 2047: 2037: 2020: 2011: 1998:Paine Ellsworth 1997: 1989: 1983: 1968: 1965: 1957: 1938: 1923: 1919: 1904: 1898: 1870: 1820: 1743: 1687: 1631: 1607: 1580: 1556: 1541: 1471: 1447: 1370: 1358: 1326: 1239: 1216: 1172: 1165: 1135: 1133: 1121: 1089: 1086:Paine Ellsworth 1081: 1057: 1043: 1037: 1011: 991: 983: 904: 896: 875: 867: 823: 815: 774: 772: 756: 748: 704: 696: 690:speedy deletion 674: 666: 617: 609: 591: 582: 576: 539: 504: 402: 342: 339: 336: 333: 332: 299: 271: 268: 265: 262: 261: 235: 230: 228: 179: 41: 31: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3092: 3090: 3082: 3081: 3076: 3071: 3066: 3061: 3056: 3051: 3041: 3040: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3005: 2978: 2928: 2906: 2905: 2891:requested move 2885: 2883: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2864: 2809: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2790: 2775: 2741: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2722: 2721: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2698: 2692: 2691: 2656: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2544:Going through 2540: 2539: 2516: 2505: 2502: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2321: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2295: 2279: 2278: 2236: 2233: 2220: 2214: 2213: 2206: 2151: 2150: 2142:Added archive 2108: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 1976: 1975: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1932: 1931: 1908: 1897: 1894: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1819: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1783: 1782: 1742: 1737: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1692:comment added 1675: 1674: 1630: 1627: 1620: 1619: 1612:comment added 1579: 1576: 1569: 1568: 1561:comment added 1540: 1537: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1476:comment added 1446: 1443: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1413: 1412: 1357: 1354: 1311: 1310: 1292: 1284: 1283: 1215: 1212: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1100: 1099: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 947: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 886: 885: 837: 836: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 742: 715: 714: 685: 684: 655: 654: 590: 587: 584: 583: 578: 574: 572: 569: 568: 567: 566: 560: 554: 545: 544: 541: 540: 535: 529: 522: 521: 518: 517: 514: 513: 510: 509: 506: 505: 503: 502: 501: 500: 491: 475: 461: 448: 430: 415: 413: 412: 401: 400: 395: 390: 385: 379: 376: 375: 367: 366: 359:Low-importance 355: 349: 348: 346: 329:the discussion 315: 303: 302: 300:Low‑importance 294: 282: 281: 278: 277: 275: 241: 240: 224: 212: 211: 206: 194: 193: 187: 176: 162: 161: 157:this help page 141:poorly sourced 127: 120: 119: 116: 115: 114: 113: 103: 82: 70: 69: 37: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3091: 3080: 3077: 3075: 3072: 3070: 3067: 3065: 3062: 3060: 3057: 3055: 3052: 3050: 3047: 3046: 3044: 3034: 3027: 3022: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3006: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2994: 2993: 2986: 2982: 2979: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2937: 2932: 2927: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2911: 2904: 2902: 2897: 2892: 2887: 2886: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2835: 2830: 2825: 2820: 2815: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2794:84.216.157.87 2791: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2776: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2746: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2724: 2723: 2718: 2717: 2712: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2672: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2654: 2646: 2641: 2636: 2632: 2626: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2602: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2571: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2537: 2534:parameter to 2525: 2521: 2517: 2510: 2509: 2503: 2501: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2486: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2430: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2410: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2358: 2353: 2348: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2322: 2319: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2287: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2242: 2234: 2232: 2231: 2225: 2218: 2211: 2207: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2191: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2167: 2162: 2160: 2156: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2135: 2127: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2062: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2050: 2041: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2017: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2003: 2002: 2000: 1988: 1981: 1973: 1967: 1966: 1959: 1958: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1947: 1943: 1941: 1929: 1926:parameter to 1917: 1913: 1909: 1902: 1901: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853:68.83.175.245 1850: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824:68.81.180.171 1817: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1798:mathematician 1795: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1754:Jack Sarfatti 1751: 1747: 1741: 1740:Jack Sarfatti 1738: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1712: 1711: 1706: 1705: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1685: 1681: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1649: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1628: 1626: 1625: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1605: 1601: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1577: 1575: 1574: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1554: 1550: 1544: 1538: 1536: 1535: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1469: 1465: 1464:216.16.55.208 1459: 1455: 1451: 1444: 1442: 1441: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1421:86.166.161.14 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377:216.16.55.208 1374: 1368: 1364: 1363:216.16.55.208 1355: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1321: 1317: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1213: 1211: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181:Crank dot net 1178: 1170: 1162: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1141: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1119:Unprotection? 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1092: 1087: 1083: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1055: 1051: 1046: 1040: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1008: 1000: 996: 994: 989: 985: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 964: 960: 956: 953:, now called 952: 948: 945: 944:User:Cheeser1 941: 937: 934:, now called 933: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 913: 909: 907: 902: 898: 892: 888: 887: 884: 880: 878: 873: 869: 863: 862: 857: 853: 852: 851: 847: 843: 839: 838: 834: 833: 832: 828: 826: 821: 817: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 780: 771: 765: 761: 759: 754: 750: 743: 739: 738: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 716: 713: 709: 707: 702: 698: 691: 687: 686: 683: 679: 677: 672: 668: 663: 659: 658: 657: 656: 653: 649: 645: 641: 640: 635: 634: 629: 628: 627: 626: 622: 620: 615: 611: 604: 600: 596: 588: 571: 570: 564: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 548: 547: 546: 543: 542: 538: 533: 528: 527: 499: 498: 493: 492: 489: 485: 482: 480: 476: 474: 470: 468: 467: 462: 460: 457: 455: 454: 449: 447: 443: 439: 437: 436: 431: 429: 426: 424: 423: 418: 417: 414: 410: 406: 405: 399: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 380: 378: 377: 373: 372: 368: 364: 360: 354: 351: 350: 347: 330: 326: 322: 321: 316: 313: 309: 308: 304: 298: 295: 292: 288: 276: 259: 258:documentation 255: 251: 247: 246: 238: 227: 225: 222: 218: 217: 213: 210: 207: 204: 200: 195: 191: 185: 177: 173: 168: 167: 159: 158: 153: 149: 145: 142: 138: 134: 133: 128: 126: 125: 111: 107: 104: 101: 97: 94: 93: 92: 91: 87: 83: 80: 76: 75: 66: 62: 61:and factual. 60: 56: 52: 45: 40: 36: 29: 28: 19: 3032: 3007: 2991: 2990: 2980: 2959: 2940: 2929: 2909: 2907: 2895: 2888: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2813: 2811: 2765:DavidWBrooks 2750:93.41.99.242 2747: 2743: 2673: 2658: 2625:Booyahhayoob 2610:Booyahhayoob 2570:Booyahhayoob 2554:Booyahhayoob 2543: 2535: 2520:edit request 2487: 2471: 2450: 2409:DavidWBrooks 2394:DavidWBrooks 2246: 2238: 2215: 2190:source check 2169: 2163: 2158: 2154: 2152: 2113: 2110: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2044: 2043: 2015: 1994: 1993: 1979: 1977: 1969: 1956:#REDIRECT]] 1952:from this... 1937: 1935: 1927: 1912:edit request 1871:— Preceding 1867: 1821: 1772:Andy Dingley 1749: 1744: 1714: 1708: 1702: 1680:216.16.54.94 1676: 1657: 1651: 1647: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1600:216.16.54.94 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1581: 1549:216.16.55.93 1545: 1542: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1359: 1322: 1318: 1312: 1300:Andy Dingley 1264: 1246:68.61.156.96 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1217: 1214:Usenet WHAT? 1196: 1166: 1139: 1122: 1091: 1082: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059:at this edit 1045:created here 1017:redirect to 1012: 993: 984: 906: 897: 877: 868: 860: 859: 825: 816: 778: 758: 749: 723: 719: 706: 697: 676: 667: 637: 631: 619: 610: 598: 592: 536: 494: 478: 477: 464: 463: 451: 450: 433: 432: 420: 419: 358: 318: 243: 190:WikiProjects 155: 143: 136: 130: 105: 96:No consensus 95: 50: 48: 38: 3016:Anachronist 2901:move review 2635:Anachronist 2601:Anachronist 2584:Anachronist 2419:Anachronist 2378:right now. 2347:Anachronist 2294:celebrity". 2035:Thank you, 1688:—Preceding 1608:—Preceding 1557:—Preceding 1472:—Preceding 1371:—Preceding 1327:—Preceding 1240:—Preceding 1171:posts from 1076:Tim Maroney 1015:Tim Maroney 1009:Tim Maroney 963:User:Mikaey 891:Derek Smart 180:Start-class 3043:Categories 2964:WP:CONCISE 2528:|answered= 1960:to this... 1920:|answered= 1802:Loadmaster 1792:practices 1721:Loadmaster 1664:Loadmaster 1517:Loadmaster 1402:Loadmaster 1185:Loadmaster 1056:). Then, 1048:by editor 1023:Kay Dekker 728:Loadmaster 644:Loadmaster 110:discussion 100:discussion 2992:Steel1943 2910:not moved 2726:Jan Burse 2662:Jan Burse 2415:WP:BOLDly 2380:Jan Burse 2324:Jan Burse 2298:Jan Burse 2248:Jan Burse 2210:this tool 2203:this tool 2074:Deepak343 1978:Template 1333:RadioKAOS 1050:Dbachmann 1042:, it was 1013:Why does 955:Archive 2 936:Archive 1 720:Archive/1 563:Archive 3 557:Archive 2 551:Archive 1 495:See also 263:Biography 209:Biography 148:libellous 53:abide by 2968:Station1 2216:Cheers.— 2126:cbignore 1944:, needs 1885:contribs 1873:unsigned 1839:SubSeven 1373:unsigned 1341:contribs 1329:unsigned 1242:unsigned 1173:sci.math 589:Archives 537:Archives 86:deletion 2917:Jenks24 2863:itself. 2822:, < 2455:MrOllie 2264:WP:NPOV 2226::Online 2155:checked 2120:my edit 1690:undated 1610:undated 1559:undated 1474:undated 1105:beefman 1039:history 724:Archive 488:YouTube 388:history 361:on the 65:user-ID 59:neutral 39:Purpose 3008:Oppose 2981:Oppose 2960:Oppose 2946:Mach61 2268:DMacks 2134:nobots 2093:DMacks 2040:rose64 2023:rose64 1289:WP:NEO 1273:DMacks 1261:WP:AFD 1147:DMacks 842:DMacks 800:DMacks 435:Expand 186:scale. 44:Usenet 2836:: --> 2831:: --> 2826:: --> 2821:: --> 2814:wrote 2780:Bduke 2676:Bduke 2640:ta/lk 2532:|ans= 2518:This 1946:rcats 1924:|ans= 1910:This 1877:Shrao 1800:". — 1662:). — 1646:I am 1315:: --> 1314:: --> 1313:: --> 1269:WP:RS 1169:crank 988:Paine 901:Paine 872:Paine 820:Paine 753:Paine 741:name. 701:Paine 671:Paine 614:Paine 597:page 479:Other 466:Stubs 453:Photo 398:purge 393:watch 3021:talk 2999:talk 2972:talk 2950:talk 2921:talk 2872:talk 2853:talk 2798:talk 2784:talk 2769:talk 2754:talk 2730:talk 2680:talk 2666:talk 2614:talk 2589:talk 2558:talk 2494:talk 2479:talk 2459:talk 2424:talk 2398:talk 2384:talk 2352:talk 2328:talk 2302:talk 2272:talk 2252:talk 2159:true 2097:talk 2078:talk 2042:! – 2027:talk 2016:Done 1980:Redr 1881:talk 1857:talk 1843:talk 1828:talk 1806:talk 1776:talk 1761:talk 1725:talk 1713:and 1684:talk 1668:talk 1604:talk 1553:talk 1521:talk 1468:talk 1425:talk 1406:talk 1400:. — 1392:the 1381:talk 1367:talk 1337:talk 1304:talk 1277:talk 1250:talk 1204:talk 1189:talk 1151:talk 1140:Done 1109:talk 1054:talk 1027:talk 959:HERE 940:HERE 846:talk 804:talk 779:Done 732:talk 648:talk 636:and 601:the 473:here 446:here 442:here 383:edit 252:and 106:Keep 51:must 2915:. 2552:). 2530:or 2522:to 2500:AP 2485:AP 2184:RfC 2146:to 2038:Red 2021:Red 1922:or 1914:to 1745:Re 1648:not 1296:GWH 1265:was 1210:AP 1084:^) 1052:, ( 986:^) 899:^) 870:^) 818:^) 786:to 751:^) 699:^) 669:^) 612:^) 599:and 444:or 353:Low 137:BLP 3045:: 3001:) 2974:) 2952:) 2941:is 2933:→ 2923:) 2893:. 2874:) 2855:) 2837:. 2800:) 2786:) 2778:-- 2771:) 2756:) 2732:) 2682:) 2668:) 2616:) 2560:) 2536:no 2496:) 2481:) 2461:) 2400:) 2386:) 2330:) 2304:) 2274:) 2254:) 2197:. 2192:}} 2188:{{ 2132:{{ 2128:}} 2124:{{ 2099:) 2080:) 2029:) 2018:-- 1990:}} 1984:{{ 1928:no 1887:) 1883:• 1859:) 1845:) 1830:) 1808:) 1778:) 1763:) 1727:) 1670:) 1523:) 1515:— 1427:) 1408:) 1383:) 1343:) 1339:• 1306:) 1279:) 1252:) 1206:) 1191:) 1153:) 1125:TS 1111:) 1090:(^ 1029:) 992:(^ 905:(^ 876:(^ 861:be 848:) 824:(^ 806:) 798:. 794:→ 757:(^ 734:) 705:(^ 675:(^ 650:) 618:(^ 3023:) 3019:( 2997:( 2970:( 2948:( 2919:( 2870:( 2851:( 2796:( 2782:( 2767:( 2752:( 2728:( 2678:( 2664:( 2642:) 2638:( 2627:: 2623:@ 2612:( 2603:: 2599:@ 2591:) 2587:( 2572:: 2568:@ 2556:( 2492:( 2477:( 2457:( 2426:) 2422:( 2411:: 2407:@ 2396:( 2382:( 2354:) 2350:( 2345:~ 2326:( 2300:( 2270:( 2250:( 2212:. 2205:. 2095:( 2076:( 2025:( 1879:( 1855:( 1841:( 1826:( 1804:( 1774:( 1759:( 1723:( 1696:. 1682:( 1666:( 1616:. 1602:( 1565:. 1551:( 1519:( 1480:. 1466:( 1423:( 1404:( 1379:( 1365:( 1335:( 1302:( 1275:( 1248:( 1202:( 1187:( 1149:( 1107:( 1025:( 946:. 844:( 802:( 730:( 646:( 481:: 469:: 456:: 438:: 425:: 365:. 260:. 192:: 160:. 135:( 112:. 102:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index