2603:«In the Hellenistic age, scientists such as Apollonius and Diocles were interested in the theoretical aspects of burning mirrors and may have experimented with them,10 but there is no reference to the practical application of a heat ray in warfare until the second half of the second century A.D. when Lucian mentions in passing that Archimedes burned ships "with his skill" (Hippias 2). Lucian did not identify the weapon, and Galen is the first author to specify mirrors as the source of heat. II Where he picked up the story is not known, but it was commonplace among scholars of the time to attribute all manner of wonders to famed sages of the past. Galen's younger contemporary, Cassius Dio, was also aware of the mirrors, for Zonaras (9.4) mentions them in his epitome of Dio's Fifteenth Book.»
763:
2192:
am not impressed. All of the content is along the lines of "So-and-so says
Leucippus says XYZ" where so-and-so was writing a few centuries after Leucippus, but then the link shows that Knowledge's text is a paraphrase of some paywalled academic paper where the author paraphrased an earlier Greek/Roman source who was paraphrasing Leucippus, so what Knowledge readers are getting is 4 steps removed from the original. This helps tick off FA boxes, and might help scholars looking for a list of recent works to cite, but readers would probably be better off with a direct quotation of the oldest extant work or a translation. –
2379:, which is certainly above average for Knowledge articles; it was just your example of exceptional citation formatting, but I don't really like the style with a plethora of footnotes often crammed together but none of them giving any detail or quotations, and in my opinion the primary sources are essential to cite in this kind of article, but there are missing. Your focus on sources from the past decade or two also seems misplaced. To my knowledge Archimedes isn't a subject of such rapid historiographical change that commentary from 50, 100, or 1000 years ago is necessarily obsolete.
2243:
Archimedes works each should be individually referenced with a footnote to the Heath source (which provides commentary, and therefore is a secondary source on the works of
Archimedes), as this remains the standard modern reference for Archimedes works. Only the palimpsest, which post-dates Heath, needs to be referenced separately (which it is). In any case, concerns over the lack of sourcing of this section are overwrought, considering the extremely high quality references Knorr and Sato that are very explicitly intended to support the section as a whole.
559:
2314:
good references. Boyer is a tertiary source, generally good (I suggested above for the mathematics section), but there are better secondary sources. Clagett is a very good source, but also specifically focuses on mathematics in the middle ages, and is incredibly detailed: we already cite his survey article on this topic. I think the
Dijksterhuis is a good source, particularly for the life of Archimedes, that could be used for some of the history section, and also for the mathematics section.
549:
528:
476:
353:
654:
633:
2476:
paywalls. Heath is terribly outdated and should be used with caution, while
Dijksterhuis is about the best your regular, "I don't work for academia" person could have access right now. Believer or not, Heiberg's work still holds on and its packed with lots of good textual and biographical information but you'll have to read German (and Latin!) to make sense of it. Bottom line, the best sources are the most esoteric, hard to reach ones, while the popular sources are often worth crap.
1146:
2282:, it would have been a paragraph long, maybe two. You'll see that I linked almost every page number to google books: readers can click on any one and immediately find the information. How is this difficult to access? By the way, I regularly used plenty of primary sources in Cai Lun and found no issues at FAC; this is because I paired each one with a secondary source, which is certainly more advisable (and productive) than sole reliance on primary sources.
1043:
182:
1642:
1022:
1136:
753:
1115:
722:
344:
1339:
215:
1251:
1230:
1941:. Every featured article needs to be "a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate". Primary sources are simply not allowed in place of suitable secondary ones. You can disagree with this all you like, but you will find that no reviewers will agree. The aforementioned
414:
386:
1261:
884:
863:
152:
1658:
970:
952:
1871:. This may all sound harsh, but that's because the issues are so woven into the article's structure that most, if not all, sections would need to be completely rewritten to meet FA standards. I understand that various editors have attempted to maintain this page over the yeas, but its existing structure from the 2007 nomination has deeply limited such efforts.
1628:
2497:
every currently unsourced section of this article. It's kind of a lot of grunt work, but especially if we include links to a scan (the IA scan is unfortunately "borrow unavailable, presumably by request of
Princeton Univ. Press) should be at least moderately helpful to readers, and might satisfy some of the footnote police. –
424:
2274:
lists multiple works by clearly established historians, and includes direct links to archive.org which is freely available. If one wants to actually engage in a "thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature", this will include academic sources which are sometimes difficult to access.
2191:
doesn't even try to link to the source texts where its claims originate. This does a disservice to readers, because it makes them jump through hoops to figure out what was actually said. I imagine in most if not all cases there are online scans of these texts and probably also translations. Frankly I
2027:
Where are the modern sources? How about the huge
Further reading section that includes multiple major recent surveys? Why is not a single one of them included? How can this be "a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources
2382:
In any event, it's a somewhat apples-to-oranges comparison because
Archimedes is a dramatically more productive, known-about, and influential figure than Leucippus. I agree with you that this article is far from comprehensive, but on the other hand if it were expanded to the level of detail found in
2266:
of academic secondary sources (which extends to the entire article). The FA criteria are explicit in asking for "a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature". Outside of the lead, there is a single book on
Archimedes sourced. The result is highly noticeable in the article, as you
1885:
The
Biography section pulls directly and extensively from ancient sources, without any filtering through modern commentary. Citations are sporadic and inconsistent. The discoveries and mathematics sections are extremely choppy and brief. Every single work of his does not need its own subsection just
1679:
The caption says "A metal bar, placed into a container of water on a scale, displaces as much water as its own volume, increasing the mass of the container's contents and weighing down the scale." This is is incorrect. To see why, suppose the metal bar was replaced by an object of the same shape but
2617:
That's accurate as far as tracing the complicated history of a "scientific" fable goes, and yes most of the time it's a game of broken telephone. But why burden the reader with all of this? Scholars have to make a living after all, sure, but I fail to see how this information will serve the reader.
2313:
Where is there reliance exclusively on primary sources? Tag some specific problems, please. A side note is that many of the sources listed in further reading are very pulpy. E.g., Netz and Noel is not a scholarly or academic source, and some of the others are, rather more obviously, probably not
2632:
The apocryphal story of the "heat ray" has clearly been of interest to readers, and it's worth being clear that it's a legend that is surely made up. I agree the details might be unnecessary here. I'd be fine with condensing the whole section down to a paragraph or so, delegating some details to a
1874:
There is poor sourcing all throughout; aside from non-existent citation formatting and sporadic page numbers, random web sources of highly variable notability are consistently prioritized over academic scholarship. In fact, I can't see that a single contemporary book-length survey of
Archimedes is
1985:
Sorry, this is still a weird argument. We know very little about the life of Archimedes other than what was said by Roman historians many years after his death. I'm not sure what these "modern sources" are supposed to be, perhaps you could find them if it is such a problem. I don't have access to
2496:
Dijksterhuis (which I only skimmed parts of) seems like an excellent source, and the consensus seems to be that it is the best available biography. I think we should pull it out in a new section of "Works Cited" or whatever, and then liberally add footnotes citing specific chapters and pages for
2475:
Here are my two cents: Netz has been publishing and translating Archimedes for over two decades, but almost everything worth reading from him is behind paywalls and he believes writing a "biography" of Archimedes is pointless. Knorr is better overall but his work is behind even more impenetrable
2238:
I agree overall with jacobolus and Ian, and appreciate the "high gloss sheen" comment in particular. I think there is no problem citing ancient sources appropriately in the biographical sections. While I haven't looked that closely, everything I looked at sourced to an ancient source also had a
1956:
I understand it is easy to see my comments as " argument", but this is a misunderstanding. I am citing real and rather egregious issues, after having review hundreds of articles for FAC & FAR, in content and source reviews. This article falls extremely flat, and defending it will take you no
1673:
related to the anecdote in question (which is only about using displacement to measure volume). The idea that "the submerged crown would displace an amount of water equal to its own volume" is so simple that I don't think it requires any demonstration, and the current demonstration only creates
2242:
There are some sourcing issues to be sure (which are very easy to fix!) The mathematics section needs better sources, as there are some paragraphs lacking footnotes. But this material is so standard as to be found in tertiary sources like Kline, or Boyer and Merzbach. Perhaps the sections in
2535:. Personally I think the direct quotation is helpful here, since the unquoted version makes it sound like we're paraphrasing a comment talking about focusing reflectors per se, whereas the direct quotation makes it clear that Lucian didn't include any specifics other than crediting "skill" (
1564:
Archimedes. I know the temptation that adding such cultural references could bring more traffic to the article but I think popular cultural references that are so incidental to the person of Archimedes (such as that of the latest Indiana Jones movie) are better housed elsewhere. --
1910:
We don't know much about the life of Archimedes and everything we do know was written long after his death; the article makes this clear. I'm not sure how "filtering through modern commentary" would help, as he has been dead for over two thousand years. This is a weird argument to
2395:
Anyway... Do you have some specific recommended recent literature that you think should be added here? One thing I'd like to see in particular is some discussion of Archimedes' influence on the mathematics and science of the medieval Islamic world, which is currently unmentioned.
1952:
Yes, "he has been dead for over two thousand years"—exactly! So scholars have had two thousand years to analyze, update and revise his biography! Would you really claim that there are no scholars which have altered, changed, updated, reinterpreted his biography from 2000 year old
2391:
relative to the amount of available material about Archimedes, it would be probably 5x longer than currently – the mathematics section alone would be longer than the current article – and we'd have people complaining that GA/FAs need to be short enough to read in one sitting or
2577:
I do appreciate your effort to keep this brief. Perhaps someone else has an idea how to make a few sentence summary that conveys that there's no contemporaneous evidence about the "heat ray" and 2nd century mentions point to some kind of incendiary (perhaps some precursor to
1709:, and could be used to measure the volume of the crown. The video isn't what Vitruvius said so it is not a direct illustration. I also think that the video could be removed without a great loss. The illustration of the screw in the water is what Vitruvius actually says.--
500:
1986:
specialist academic libraries or paywalled academic resources, so it is hard for me to know exactly what you want here. We know that many of the things said by the Roman historians are likely to be apocryphal, which is why they are treated with caution.--
1684:: the water exerts an upward force on the object proportional to the displaced volume, and by Newton's Third Law the object exerts an equal and opposite force on the water, pushing the container down. The description of the file explains this correctly.
2331:
The biography's first paragraph does not have primary sources; it includes a source from 1897 (?), a 1975 journal article and a dictionary entry, the latter two being some of the only scholarship in the whole section. The last sentence is
2208:
has a high gloss sheen, but if someone wanted to actually read and verify the cites it would be very difficult. I have tried to stick to easy to follow cites, not what someone said about it on page 336 of an obscure or paywalled academic
2637:. I'm just not sure what that paragraph should say. Maybe we should be leading along the lines of, "As legend has it, Archimedes focused the light of the sun using large mirrors and set Roman ships ablaze at the siege of Syracuse..." –
1496:
meant in all likelihood a wreath. In any case, this is too intricate for a regular reader to know, and your solution (i.e. mentioning the crown was likely a votive wreath) is sensible enough and should suffice for now. Thanks. --
1587:
for the page views of this article, up from an average of around 2,500 a day to over 30,000 on 2 July. It's probably the first time that Archimedes has been a character in a big budget Hollywood movie, and he is played by Nasser
1559:
I agree with your assessment, as there was never an "Archimedes dial" and certainly not one that can travel through time. We do not know who built the Antikythera mechanism either but the evidence collected suggest it was likely
2246:
The "Legacy" section is also very weak. It's hard to overstate the continuing legacy of Archimedes in mathematics: one could go so far as to say that he invented mathematics as we know it. The section doesn't even try.
2079:
is a goldmine for academic sources. You'll see that the further reading section already includes quite a few links to archive.org copies, which are freely available to borrow (sometimes a free registration is needed).
2416:, 2022), edited by Chemla, which involved a paper by Netz, "The place of Archimedes in world history", accompanied by responses from 13 other scholars. Knowledge editors with moderate experience can access these via
2052:
seems to be from specialist academic sources. I don't have easy access to this type of material and people who want to read the sources for themselves would also have this problem. However, I accept your point on
1731:
That illustration is perfect, thanks for finding it! (I did look earlier but couldn't find anything.) I'll go ahead and replace the video with this illustration in a couple of days if there are no objections. --
2721:
1177:
2771:
490:
2716:
2353:
a single section, I suspect there are plenty of others. Other examples (from a glance) include the first paragraph of the Heat ray section and the second paragraph of the Astronomical instruments. –
1886:
to include two (usually uncited) sentences. The legacy section is merely a list of length quotes and random trivia; no information on his actual influence into later mathematics is explained.
2766:
2328:
Almost the entire biography is exclusively relying on primary sources; please note that these "Rorres, Chris" citations are just a web page with a public domain translation of Greek authors.
2866:
934:
924:
615:
1645:
Measurement of volume by displacement, (a) before and (b) after an object has been submerged. The amount by which the liquid rises in the cylinder (∆V) is equal to the volume of the object.
2871:
831:
732:
2649:
I propose we leave the section as is for now and let others weigh in before editing any more. It's getting late and I don't want us to inadvertently start the next Great Edit War.
1386:, which is usually translated into English as crown. As Chris Rorres points out, other historical research suggests that the crown would likely have been in the shape of a wreath.
2836:
2020:, we do not interpret primary sources on Knowledge. This is a tertiary encyclopedia that summarizes secondary sources. We don't cite from Roman sources directly, period, and we
2861:
900:
485:
396:
221:
2896:
2751:
1212:
1202:
1750:
was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons in April 2022 so it is a relatively new image there. It does fit in with the text of the Vitruvius anecdote a lot better than the video.--
2267:
point out, the mathematics sections and legacy are surprisingly sparse, and the reliance on solely primary sources (or not sources) for large swathes of text is not ideal.
143:
2776:
1882:), which seems to imply that the lead and the body are not matched at all. The lead includes no biographical information, and its structure is very difficult to follow.
1382:: There are not many versions of the story that refer to "Archimedes and the golden wreath"; I've never come across this before. This is because Vitruvius uses the word
2560:
stuff to this, as I keep arguing the discussion better belongs to the Archimedes heat ray entry. Maybe our efforts should divert there if said article is not up to par.
2130:
It would help if someone dug up recent scholarly work that evaluated the traditional tales and checked them for consistency, plausibility, etc. Something like what the
2926:
2901:
509:
400:
314:
196:
2075:
I appreciate that. Certainly that material is more difficult to access, but nowadays there are more resources for that. GoogleBooks includes extensive previews, and
896:
891:
868:
2851:
2556:
The reason why it may read like that is the preceding sentence about Diocles that was not originally there. I'm all for taking Diocles out, rather than add even
1532:
This hasn't been added to the article yet, because the film is not released until 30 June in the USA. It probably will get added, but it runs into problems with
2891:
1172:
819:
2338:
The biography's third paragraph is only primary sources (save for the line "He also mentions that Marcellus brought to Rome two planetariums Archimedes built")
895:, a group of contributors interested in Knowledge's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
2916:
2285:
In any case, there seems to be some confusion. I'm not saying this is a bad article, or even that the sourcing is bad, I'm saying that it does not match the
844:
736:
2463:
Does anyone have the energy to find page numbers in Dijksterhuis, Heath, etc.? Citing these long books without more specifics seems a bit mean to readers. –
1661:. I am proposing to remove this demonstration because it is not related to the corresponding text, and because the explanation in the caption is incorrect:
2781:
2741:
988:
2138:. I don't see a fundamental problem with our reporting "Cicero said..." as long as we have further, modern sources to contextualize that. Nothing in the
2806:
2791:
2756:
605:
79:
2841:
2831:
2736:
809:
276:
1536:, because it is not directly related to Archimedes other than the name, and there is no evidence that Archimedes designed the Antikythera mechanism.
2816:
2746:
2341:
The biography's fourth paragraph is only primary sources, save for the its last line (I checked the Jaeger source and it only covers the last line).
1168:
1159:
1120:
694:
2911:
2796:
1317:
1307:
704:
442:
2801:
977:
957:
581:
2150:
article for not giving direct pointers to editions/translations of the ancient sources; that's mildly inconvenient! When we say, for example,
762:
2921:
2881:
2856:
2726:
1521:
1097:
1087:
85:
1654:
2821:
2761:
2711:
446:
1680:
with near-zero density. The container would still lower, even though no mass is "added" (whatever that means). The correct explanation is
2886:
2286:
1841:
1418:
2826:
1461:
785:
450:
44:
2811:
1283:
670:
572:
533:
441:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
2479:
I do agree the article needs a major Enterprise "refit" to keep it FA worthy, just wanted you to know what we might be up against.
1595:
requirement is sourcing showing why something is notable, and the film has very little to do with the actual work of Archimedes.--
2906:
2846:
2786:
2731:
357:
2876:
2417:
1477:
1063:
437:
391:
99:
30:
2408:
One source people may want to look at with some counterfactual speculation about Archimedes' influence is the recent issue of
1530:
104:
20:
1832:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1705:
The story told by Vitruvius says only that Archimedes noticed that the water level of the bath rose as he got in, which is
2539:) . I understand that we're trying to keep this brief here and offload details to the (currently mediocre and incomplete)
1858:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1589:
776:
727:
74:
1274:
1235:
661:
638:
366:
2013:
1167:
content on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
1164:
191:
65:
1867:
This article is deeply below FA standards, and unless immense and extensive improvements are made, it should go to
1050:
1027:
151:
122:
1933:
Hi there, this is a rather revealing point to harp on, and I highly recommend you take a look at some recent FAs (
2684:
2543:, but we also want to try to give readers the least misleading brief summary we can. What do other folks think? –
1151:
257:
139:
135:
131:
127:
162:
1347:
343:
181:
2421:
2175:
1845:
2654:
2623:
2568:
2487:
1635:
1570:
1502:
109:
1666:
1481:
1062:
history on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
214:
2680:
2634:
2540:
2319:
2252:
2171:
1526:
1473:
372:
201:
558:
1525:, Jones goes on a search for the Archimedes Dial, a device capable of time travel. It is based on the
1468:, not the wreath. Diadems began to replace wreaths as symbols of power and victory towards the end of
2121:
1706:
1592:
1533:
2582:
or the like) but by ~600 AD there was apparently an established legend about reflectors and ships. –
2436:
Another possibly useful source relevant to Archimedes' influence is the 2010 conference proceedings
2667:
2641:
2609:
2586:
2547:
2501:
2467:
2451:
2428:
2400:
2196:
55:
2289:. Alas, these are two very different things, and you are all welcome to (rather bizarrely) dig on
1282:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
987:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
784:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
669:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
580:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2650:
2619:
2595:
2564:
2520:
2483:
2157:
1879:
1815:
1773:
1733:
1689:
1566:
1498:
1387:
564:
167:
70:
548:
527:
475:
2017:
1938:
205:
51:
2676:
2440:
2315:
2248:
2167:
1777:
1737:
1693:
429:
164:
2162:, a reader shouldn't have to get a paywalled journal article to find which sections of the
1393:
in assuming that it would have been a wreath, so it is safer not to put it into his voice.
2361:
2301:
2239:
secondary source nearby. E.g., Something about ancient source . Another sentence or two.
2117:
2088:
2036:
1965:
1949:
citing academic articles and books from the last 20 years (albeit a single one from 1979).
1897:
1641:
1584:
653:
632:
1650:
1042:
1021:
2664:
2638:
2606:
2583:
2544:
2498:
2464:
2448:
2425:
2397:
2193:
1889:
There is much more to say, but in conclusion I'm afraid the issues are rather extreme.
1469:
768:
1135:
1114:
2705:
2139:
2113:
2109:
1868:
1808:
1804:
1266:
2212:
2105:
2056:
1989:
1914:
1875:
even touched, let a lone used extensively—why are they all in the further reading!
1753:
1747:
1712:
1598:
1539:
1476:, where wreaths were used, were no longer held sometime in the 5th century AD (see
1428:
1396:
1390:
1059:
2135:
2076:
752:
721:
577:
2413:
1250:
1229:
413:
385:
2579:
2532:
2444:
2356:
2296:
2271:
2101:
2083:
2031:
1960:
1892:
1338:
1256:
1141:
758:
554:
499:
419:
24:
2384:
2376:
2290:
2205:
2188:
2147:
2049:
1942:
1934:
1485:
1389:. Since Vitruvius does not give the exact shape of the crown, there is some
2422:
https://journals-sagepub-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/toc/idsa/47/3-4
2155:
explored cosmological ideas similar to those of Leucippus in the dialogue
883:
862:
1681:
1454:
1357:
2598:
2388:
2279:
969:
951:
781:
2293:
all you want, but it reflects the reality of what FAs are now a-days.
2275:
That's why Knowledge exists, to make such information more accessible.
1621:
Remove metal bar demonstration (not relevant and explanation is wrong)
981:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are
166:
2536:
1674:
confusion because it is counterintuitive and not related to the text.
1465:
1279:
983:
666:
449:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
2670:
2658:
2644:
2627:
2612:
2589:
2572:
2550:
2504:
2491:
2470:
2454:
2431:
2403:
2368:
2323:
2308:
2256:
2226:
2199:
2152:
2125:
2095:
2070:
2043:
2003:
1972:
1928:
1904:
1849:
1820:
1781:
1767:
1741:
1726:
1697:
1640:
1612:
1574:
1553:
1506:
1442:
1410:
2278:
If I only used web/non-academic sources when I wrote the now-FA
1055:
1054:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of
2108:. Sounds like a heated discussion is occurring. I pinged both
1423:
1333:
337:
168:
15:
1425:
But we don't know, and this may be historically inaccurate.--
2675:
Looks OK to me (one of the links was dead but salvageable).
2605:
But I am not sure if this is an entirely accurate summary. –
2525:"Archimedes 'burned the enemy ships by means of his skill' "
498:
474:
899:. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
2722:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
2028:
and are supported by inline citations where appropriate"?
1171:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
2262:
Primary sources are not the main problem here. It is the
1746:
I've gone ahead and swapped the video for the new image.
2772:
Top-importance biography (science and academia) articles
2335:
The biography's second paragraph is only primary sources
2146:
use of primary sources. (Indeed, I'd actually fault the
2344:
The biography's final paragraph is only primary sources
2270:
These academic sources are not niche or hard-to-acess.
1379:
307:
288:
269:
250:
2717:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
2008:"which is why they are treated with caution" — they
1278:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
780:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
665:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
576:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1878:There are way too many references in the lead (see
1840:arcamidus was born in siracuse Sicily was Sicilian
1796:
Arcamidus was born in siracuse Sicily was not greek
2767:FA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
1422:, the crown is shown as having a crown like shape.
220:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
2867:Top-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
2663:I took another crack at it. Is that any better? –
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2872:All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
1653:(anectode about volume of gold crown and bath;
909:Knowledge:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
912:Template:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
1178:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
8:
2837:FA-Class physics articles of High-importance
2523:semi-reverted my direct quotation of Lucian
204:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
200:as one of the best articles produced by the
194:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
2862:FA-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
2897:Top-importance history of science articles
2752:Knowledge level-3 vital articles in People
1224:
1109:
1016:
946:
857:
716:
627:
522:
380:
229:
176:
1449:The etymology of the word "crown", Latin
1163:, an attempt to improve and organize the
2777:Science and academia work group articles
1187:Knowledge:WikiProject History of Science
507:This article is listed on the project's
341:
2927:Knowledge pages referenced by the press
2902:WikiProject History of Science articles
1945:, for example, has a biography section
1226:
1190:Template:WikiProject History of Science
1111:
1018:
948:
859:
718:
629:
524:
382:
295:
2602:
2528:
2524:
2151:
997:Knowledge:WikiProject Spoken Knowledge
2852:FA-Class physics biographies articles
1522:Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
1514:Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
1000:Template:WikiProject Spoken Knowledge
892:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
7:
2892:FA-Class history of science articles
2633:couple of footnotes and the rest to
2447:edited by Paipetis and Ceccarelli. –
1828:The following discussion is closed.
1488:, however, lived in the 1st century
1272:This article is within the scope of
1048:This article is within the scope of
975:This article is within the scope of
889:This article is within the scope of
774:This article is within the scope of
659:This article is within the scope of
570:This article is within the scope of
435:This article is within the scope of
2917:WikiProject Greece general articles
2132:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1464:) likely descends from the ancient
1419:Once Upon a Time... The Discoverers
486:the science and academia work group
23:for discussing improvements to the
2782:FA-Class biography (core) articles
2742:Knowledge vital articles in People
915:Classical Greece and Rome articles
14:
2807:Top-priority mathematics articles
2792:Top-importance biography articles
2757:FA-Class vital articles in People
2410:Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
1348:mentioned by a media organization
590:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
2842:FA-Class fluid dynamics articles
2832:High-importance physics articles
2737:Knowledge level-3 vital articles
2375:Sorry, I'm not trying to rag on
1854:The discussion above is closed.
1665:The demonstration is related to
1626:
1337:
1259:
1249:
1228:
1144:
1134:
1113:
1041:
1020:
968:
950:
882:
861:
761:
751:
720:
652:
631:
593:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
557:
547:
526:
422:
412:
384:
351:
342:
213:
180:
150:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2817:High-importance Sicily articles
2747:FA-Class level-3 vital articles
2529:"Archimedes burned enemy ships"
2418:Knowledge:The Knowledge Library
1360:. The New York Review of Books.
1312:This article has been rated as
1207:This article has been rated as
1092:This article has been rated as
929:This article has been rated as
814:This article has been rated as
699:This article has been rated as
610:This article has been rated as
459:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
2912:High-importance Greek articles
2797:WikiProject Biography articles
1782:15:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
1768:09:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1742:08:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1727:18:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
1698:16:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
1519:In the new Indiana Jones film
1453:, is indeed complex (see here
1356:Nicholson Baker (2008-03-20).
1175:. You can also help with the
1160:History of Science WikiProject
462:Template:WikiProject Biography
371:It is of interest to multiple
1:
2802:FA-Class mathematics articles
1669:(separate article), but it's
1286:and see a list of open tasks.
1066:and see a list of open tasks.
991:and see a list of open tasks.
842:This article is supported by
829:This article is supported by
794:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
788:and see a list of open tasks.
673:and see a list of open tasks.
584:and see a list of open tasks.
483:This article is supported by
42:Put new text under old text.
2922:All WikiProject Greece pages
2882:Low-importance Rome articles
2857:Physics biographies articles
2727:Old requests for peer review
2012:be treated at all... that's
1748:Displacement-measurement.svg
1292:Knowledge:WikiProject Greece
1157:This article is part of the
978:WikiProject Spoken Knowledge
797:Template:WikiProject Physics
679:Knowledge:WikiProject Sicily
447:contribute to the discussion
2822:WikiProject Sicily articles
2762:FA-Class biography articles
2712:Knowledge featured articles
1358:""The Charms of Knowledge""
1295:Template:WikiProject Greece
1193:history of science articles
682:Template:WikiProject Sicily
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2943:
2887:All WikiProject Rome pages
2527:and replaced it with just
2272:Archimedes#Further reading
1624:
1318:project's importance scale
1213:project's importance scale
1098:project's importance scale
1072:Knowledge:WikiProject Rome
935:project's importance scale
820:project's importance scale
705:project's importance scale
315:Featured article candidate
2827:FA-Class physics articles
2685:17:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
2671:10:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
2471:01:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
2445:10.1007/978-90-481-9091-1
2432:00:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
2404:20:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2369:18:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2324:18:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2309:18:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2287:Featured article criteria
2257:11:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2227:06:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2200:04:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2176:04:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2126:02:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
2096:19:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
2071:18:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
2048:A lot of the sourcing in
2044:18:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
2004:18:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
1973:18:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
1937:, for instance) and read
1929:08:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
1905:20:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
1816:
1554:09:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
1507:16:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
1443:11:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
1411:11:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
1311:
1244:
1206:
1152:History of science portal
1129:
1091:
1075:Template:WikiProject Rome
1036:
1003:Spoken Knowledge articles
963:
928:
906:Classical Greece and Rome
877:
869:Classical Greece and Rome
841:
828:
813:
746:
698:
647:
609:
542:
506:
482:
407:
379:
324:
296:Good article reassessment
232:
228:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2812:FA-Class Sicily articles
2659:06:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2645:06:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2628:06:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2613:05:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2590:05:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2573:05:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2551:05:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2505:05:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2492:04:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2455:02:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
2438:The Genius of Archimedes
1856:Please do not modify it.
1850:09:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
1830:Please do not modify it.
1821:09:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
1613:07:14, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1583:The release of the film
1575:02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1492:, and for his readers a
1460:image of a crown (e.g.,
832:Fluid Dynamics Taskforce
616:project's priority scale
222:Today's featured article
2907:FA-Class Greek articles
2847:Fluid dynamics articles
2787:Core biography articles
2732:FA-Class vital articles
1707:displacement of a fluid
573:WikiProject Mathematics
2877:FA-Class Rome articles
1957:where, unfortunately.
1646:
1416:In the French cartoon
1346:This article has been
503:
479:
75:avoid personal attacks
2024:in featured articles.
1667:Archimedes' principle
1651:Archimedes' principle
1644:
1527:Antikythera mechanism
845:Biographies Taskforce
502:
478:
438:WikiProject Biography
358:level-3 vital article
144:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
2635:Archimedes' heat ray
2541:Archimedes' heat ray
2014:WP:Original Research
1484:for some examples).
596:mathematics articles
397:Science and Academia
258:Good article nominee
224:on January 29, 2008.
105:No original research
2414:Volume 47 Issue 3-4
2116:for more opinions.
1636:Revision 1175633671
777:WikiProject Physics
202:Knowledge community
1831:
1647:
1275:WikiProject Greece
1184:History of Science
1165:history of science
1121:History of Science
662:WikiProject Sicily
565:Mathematics portal
504:
480:
465:biography articles
367:content assessment
233:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
2022:definitely do not
1829:
1369:
1368:
1332:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1223:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1010:
945:
944:
941:
940:
856:
855:
852:
851:
715:
714:
711:
710:
626:
625:
622:
621:
521:
520:
517:
516:
336:
335:
332:
331:
175:
174:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2934:
2515:Heat ray section
2366:
2364:
2359:
2306:
2304:
2299:
2222:
2220:
2219:
2204:The sourcing in
2093:
2091:
2086:
2066:
2064:
2063:
2041:
2039:
2034:
1999:
1997:
1996:
1970:
1968:
1963:
1924:
1922:
1921:
1902:
1900:
1895:
1818:
1813:
1763:
1761:
1760:
1722:
1720:
1719:
1638:
1630:
1629:
1608:
1606:
1605:
1549:
1547:
1546:
1438:
1436:
1435:
1406:
1404:
1403:
1374:Crown or wreath?
1361:
1341:
1334:
1300:
1299:
1296:
1293:
1290:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1253:
1246:
1245:
1240:
1232:
1225:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1154:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1138:
1131:
1130:
1125:
1117:
1110:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1051:WikiProject Rome
1045:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1024:
1017:
1005:
1004:
1001:
998:
995:
994:Spoken Knowledge
972:
965:
964:
958:Spoken Knowledge
954:
947:
917:
916:
913:
910:
907:
886:
879:
878:
873:
865:
858:
802:
801:
800:physics articles
798:
795:
792:
771:
766:
765:
755:
748:
747:
742:
739:
724:
717:
687:
686:
683:
680:
677:
656:
649:
648:
643:
635:
628:
598:
597:
594:
591:
588:
567:
562:
561:
551:
544:
543:
538:
530:
523:
510:core biographies
467:
466:
463:
460:
457:
443:join the project
432:
430:Biography portal
427:
426:
425:
416:
409:
408:
403:
388:
381:
364:
355:
354:
347:
346:
338:
327:Featured article
325:Current status:
310:
308:October 23, 2007
291:
272:
253:
230:
217:
192:featured article
184:
177:
169:
155:
154:
145:
95:Article policies
16:
2942:
2941:
2937:
2936:
2935:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2702:
2701:
2519:Quick aside , @
2517:
2362:
2357:
2355:
2302:
2297:
2295:
2217:
2215:
2213:
2166:are relevant.)
2142:policy forbids
2089:
2084:
2082:
2061:
2059:
2057:
2037:
2032:
2030:
1994:
1992:
1990:
1966:
1961:
1959:
1919:
1917:
1915:
1898:
1893:
1891:
1865:
1860:
1859:
1834:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1809:
1798:
1758:
1756:
1754:
1717:
1715:
1713:
1659:a demonstration
1639:
1634:
1632:
1627:
1623:
1603:
1601:
1599:
1544:
1542:
1540:
1517:
1433:
1431:
1429:
1401:
1399:
1397:
1376:
1365:
1364:
1355:
1351:
1314:High-importance
1297:
1294:
1291:
1288:
1287:
1265:
1260:
1258:
1239:High‑importance
1238:
1192:
1189:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1150:
1145:
1143:
1123:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1067:
1030:
1002:
999:
996:
993:
992:
914:
911:
908:
905:
904:
871:
816:High-importance
799:
796:
793:
790:
789:
767:
760:
741:High‑importance
740:
730:
701:High-importance
685:Sicily articles
684:
681:
678:
675:
674:
642:High‑importance
641:
595:
592:
589:
586:
585:
563:
556:
536:
464:
461:
458:
455:
454:
428:
423:
421:
394:
365:on Knowledge's
362:
352:
306:
289:August 23, 2007
287:
268:
249:
171:
170:
165:
142:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2940:
2938:
2930:
2929:
2924:
2919:
2914:
2909:
2904:
2899:
2894:
2889:
2884:
2879:
2874:
2869:
2864:
2859:
2854:
2849:
2844:
2839:
2834:
2829:
2824:
2819:
2814:
2809:
2804:
2799:
2794:
2789:
2784:
2779:
2774:
2769:
2764:
2759:
2754:
2749:
2744:
2739:
2734:
2729:
2724:
2719:
2714:
2704:
2703:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2592:
2561:
2516:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2480:
2477:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2434:
2393:
2380:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2342:
2339:
2336:
2333:
2283:
2276:
2268:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2128:
2025:
2016:, please read
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1954:
1950:
1864:
1861:
1853:
1837:
1835:
1826:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1686:
1685:
1676:
1675:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1585:worked wonders
1578:
1577:
1516:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1470:Late Antiquity
1446:
1445:
1375:
1372:
1367:
1366:
1363:
1362:
1352:
1345:
1344:
1342:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1310:
1304:
1303:
1301:
1298:Greek articles
1284:the discussion
1271:
1270:
1254:
1242:
1241:
1233:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1209:Top-importance
1205:
1199:
1198:
1196:
1156:
1155:
1139:
1127:
1126:
1124:Top‑importance
1118:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1094:Low-importance
1090:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1064:the discussion
1046:
1034:
1033:
1031:Low‑importance
1025:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1006:
989:the discussion
973:
961:
960:
955:
943:
942:
939:
938:
931:Top-importance
927:
921:
920:
918:
887:
875:
874:
872:Top‑importance
866:
854:
853:
850:
849:
840:
837:
836:
827:
824:
823:
812:
806:
805:
803:
786:the discussion
773:
772:
769:Physics portal
756:
744:
743:
733:Fluid Dynamics
725:
713:
712:
709:
708:
697:
691:
690:
688:
671:the discussion
657:
645:
644:
636:
624:
623:
620:
619:
608:
602:
601:
599:
582:the discussion
569:
568:
552:
540:
539:
531:
519:
518:
515:
514:
505:
495:
494:
491:Top-importance
481:
471:
470:
468:
434:
433:
417:
405:
404:
389:
377:
376:
370:
348:
334:
333:
330:
329:
322:
321:
318:
311:
303:
302:
299:
292:
284:
283:
280:
273:
265:
264:
261:
254:
251:April 23, 2007
246:
245:
242:
239:
235:
234:
226:
225:
218:
210:
209:
185:
173:
172:
163:
161:
160:
157:
156:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2939:
2928:
2925:
2923:
2920:
2918:
2915:
2913:
2910:
2908:
2905:
2903:
2900:
2898:
2895:
2893:
2890:
2888:
2885:
2883:
2880:
2878:
2875:
2873:
2870:
2868:
2865:
2863:
2860:
2858:
2855:
2853:
2850:
2848:
2845:
2843:
2840:
2838:
2835:
2833:
2830:
2828:
2825:
2823:
2820:
2818:
2815:
2813:
2810:
2808:
2805:
2803:
2800:
2798:
2795:
2793:
2790:
2788:
2785:
2783:
2780:
2778:
2775:
2773:
2770:
2768:
2765:
2763:
2760:
2758:
2755:
2753:
2750:
2748:
2745:
2743:
2740:
2738:
2735:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2725:
2723:
2720:
2718:
2715:
2713:
2710:
2709:
2707:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2669:
2666:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2656:
2652:
2651:Guillermind81
2648:
2647:
2646:
2643:
2640:
2636:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2620:Guillermind81
2616:
2615:
2614:
2611:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2597:
2594:Africa 1975 (
2593:
2591:
2588:
2585:
2581:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2565:Guillermind81
2562:
2559:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2549:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2521:Guillermind81
2514:
2506:
2503:
2500:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2484:Guillermind81
2481:
2478:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2469:
2466:
2462:
2456:
2453:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2439:
2435:
2433:
2430:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2402:
2399:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2381:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2367:
2365:
2360:
2352:
2348:
2343:
2340:
2337:
2334:
2330:
2329:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2307:
2305:
2300:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2244:
2240:
2228:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2207:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2198:
2195:
2190:
2187:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2087:
2078:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2042:
2040:
2035:
2026:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1974:
1971:
1969:
1964:
1955:
1951:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1896:
1887:
1883:
1881:
1876:
1872:
1870:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1842:51.155.64.194
1838:
1833:
1822:
1819:
1814:
1812:
1806:
1805:Magna Graecia
1795:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1749:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1708:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1683:
1678:
1677:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1643:
1637:
1620:
1614:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1594:
1593:WP:POPCULTURE
1590:
1586:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:Guillermind81
1563:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1535:
1534:WP:POPCULTURE
1531:
1528:
1524:
1523:
1515:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1499:Guillermind81
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1474:ancient games
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1424:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1373:
1371:
1359:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1335:
1319:
1315:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1302:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1268:
1267:Greece portal
1257:
1255:
1252:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1214:
1210:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1197:
1180:
1179:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1153:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1078:Rome articles
1065:
1061:
1060:ancient Roman
1057:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1019:
1007:
990:
986:
985:
980:
979:
974:
971:
967:
966:
962:
959:
956:
953:
949:
936:
932:
926:
923:
922:
919:
902:
898:
894:
893:
888:
885:
881:
880:
876:
870:
867:
864:
860:
847:
846:
839:
838:
834:
833:
826:
825:
821:
817:
811:
808:
807:
804:
787:
783:
779:
778:
770:
764:
759:
757:
754:
750:
749:
745:
738:
734:
729:
726:
723:
719:
706:
702:
696:
693:
692:
689:
672:
668:
664:
663:
658:
655:
651:
650:
646:
640:
637:
634:
630:
617:
613:
607:
604:
603:
600:
583:
579:
575:
574:
566:
560:
555:
553:
550:
546:
545:
541:
535:
532:
529:
525:
512:
511:
501:
497:
496:
492:
489:(assessed as
488:
487:
477:
473:
472:
469:
452:
451:documentation
448:
444:
440:
439:
431:
420:
418:
415:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
393:
390:
387:
383:
378:
374:
368:
360:
359:
349:
345:
340:
339:
328:
323:
319:
317:
316:
312:
309:
305:
304:
300:
298:
297:
293:
290:
286:
285:
281:
279:
278:
274:
271:
270:July 26, 2007
267:
266:
262:
260:
259:
255:
252:
248:
247:
243:
240:
237:
236:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
178:
159:
158:
153:
149:
141:
137:
133:
129:
126:
124:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2557:
2518:
2437:
2409:
2354:
2350:
2349:Now this is
2294:
2263:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2211:
2210:
2163:
2156:
2143:
2131:
2081:
2055:
2054:
2029:
2021:
2009:
1988:
1987:
1958:
1946:
1913:
1912:
1890:
1888:
1884:
1877:
1873:
1866:
1855:
1839:
1836:
1827:
1810:
1752:
1751:
1711:
1710:
1687:
1670:
1649:The section
1648:
1597:
1596:
1561:
1538:
1537:
1520:
1518:
1513:
1493:
1489:
1457:
1450:
1427:
1426:
1417:
1395:
1394:
1383:
1377:
1370:
1313:
1273:
1208:
1176:
1169:project page
1158:
1093:
1049:
982:
976:
930:
897:project page
890:
843:
830:
815:
775:
700:
660:
612:Top-priority
611:
571:
537:Top‑priority
508:
484:
436:
373:WikiProjects
356:
326:
313:
294:
275:
256:
206:please do so
195:
187:
147:
121:
94:
19:This is the
2316:Tito Omburo
2249:Tito Omburo
2077:Archive.org
1880:WP:LEADCITE
1863:FA Criteria
1772:Thanks! --
1657:) includes
737:Biographies
587:Mathematics
578:mathematics
534:Mathematics
277:Peer review
31:not a forum
2706:Categories
2677:XOR'easter
2580:Greek fire
2533:§ Heat ray
2168:XOR'easter
2136:Pythagoras
2118:Dedhert.Jr
2018:WP:Primary
1939:WP:Primary
1173:discussion
197:identified
188:Archimedes
25:Archimedes
2665:jacobolus
2639:jacobolus
2607:jacobolus
2584:jacobolus
2545:jacobolus
2499:jacobolus
2465:jacobolus
2449:jacobolus
2426:jacobolus
2398:jacobolus
2392:whatever.
2385:Leucippus
2377:Leucippus
2291:Leucippus
2206:Leucippus
2194:jacobolus
2189:Leucippus
2148:Leucippus
2144:judicious
2134:does for
2050:Leucippus
2010:shouldn't
1953:accounts?
1943:Leucippus
1935:Leucippus
1655:permalink
1588:Memarzia.
1486:Vitruvius
1472:, as the
1462:The Crown
1380:this edit
901:talk page
456:Biography
392:Biography
361:is rated
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2601:) says:
2332:uncited.
1811:Remsense
1682:buoyancy
1631:Resolved
1591:The key
363:FA-class
320:Promoted
282:Reviewed
148:365 days
123:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2599:4348211
2389:Cai Lun
2280:Cai Lun
2209:work.--
2164:Timaeus
2158:Timaeus
2106:Ianmacm
2053:this.--
1911:make.--
1316:on the
1211:on the
1096:on the
933:on the
818:on the
791:Physics
782:Physics
728:Physics
703:on the
614:on the
241:Process
2537:techne
2363:(talk)
2303:(talk)
2140:WP:NOR
2114:WP:PHY
2110:WP:WPM
2090:(talk)
2038:(talk)
1967:(talk)
1899:(talk)
1869:WP:FAR
1774:Hddqsb
1734:Hddqsb
1690:Hddqsb
1494:corona
1466:diadem
1451:corona
1384:corona
1289:Greece
1280:Greece
1236:Greece
984:spoken
676:Sicily
667:Sicily
639:Sicily
369:scale.
263:Listed
244:Result
2596:JSTOR
2531:, in
2358:Aza24
2298:Aza24
2153:Plato
2102:Aza24
2085:Aza24
2033:Aza24
1962:Aza24
1894:Aza24
1391:WP:OR
513:page.
350:This
190:is a
84:Seek
2681:talk
2655:talk
2624:talk
2569:talk
2558:more
2488:talk
2351:just
2320:talk
2264:lack
2253:talk
2214:♦Ian
2172:talk
2122:talk
2112:and
2058:♦Ian
1991:♦Ian
1947:only
1916:♦Ian
1846:talk
1803:See
1778:talk
1755:♦Ian
1738:talk
1714:♦Ian
1694:talk
1600:♦Ian
1571:talk
1562:not
1541:♦Ian
1503:talk
1482:here
1480:and
1478:here
1458:Our
1430:♦Ian
1398:♦Ian
1308:High
1069:Rome
1058:and
1056:Rome
1028:Rome
810:High
695:High
445:and
401:Core
301:Kept
238:Date
73:and
2668:(t)
2642:(t)
2610:(t)
2587:(t)
2563:--
2548:(t)
2502:(t)
2482:--
2468:(t)
2452:(t)
2441:doi
2429:(t)
2420:at
2401:(t)
2387:or
2197:(t)
2104:, @
1688:--
1671:not
1456:).
1378:Re
1203:Top
1088:Low
925:Top
606:Top
2708::
2683:)
2657:)
2626:)
2571:)
2490:)
2322:)
2255:)
2221:M♦
2216:Ma
2174:)
2124:)
2065:M♦
2060:Ma
1998:M♦
1993:Ma
1923:M♦
1918:Ma
1848:)
1807:.
1780:)
1762:M♦
1757:Ma
1740:)
1721:M♦
1716:Ma
1696:)
1633:–
1607:M♦
1602:Ma
1573:)
1548:M♦
1543:Ma
1505:)
1490:BC
1437:M♦
1432:Ma
1405:M♦
1400:Ma
735:/
731::
493:).
399:/
395::
146::
138:,
134:,
130:,
54:;
2679:(
2653:(
2622:(
2567:(
2486:(
2443::
2424:–
2412:(
2396:–
2318:(
2251:(
2218:c
2170:(
2120:(
2100:@
2062:c
1995:c
1920:c
1844:(
1817:诉
1776:(
1759:c
1736:(
1718:c
1692:(
1604:c
1569:(
1545:c
1529:.
1501:(
1434:c
1402:c
1350::
1320:.
1215:.
1181:.
1100:.
937:.
903:.
848:.
835:.
822:.
707:.
618:.
453:.
375:.
208:.
140:4
136:3
132:2
128:1
125::
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.