1365:
like you, adding to the conversation. If others weigh-in and agree with you, good, you've got the consensus you were looking for and can for it. You also seem to assume that "drug-taking" and "hard-drinking" are derogatory statements. I do not take such a negative view of enjoying intoxicants, hence me being a fan of both comedians. I'm not sure if you follow Ari, but his drug-taking is well known by those who do, as is
Kreischer's heavy drinking. They are both very open about this. Much like the story of Ari slipping Molly to Kreischer, both have talked at length about their drug use and alcohol use on many podcasts. I meant no offense nor was I casting judgement on their activities, but I stand by my response to your proposal and the rationale given. I didn't create Knowledge's policies, I was simply citing them to support my argument. I don't see how the fact that contentious or poorly-sourced information already exists in that section supports the idea that we should be adding more. Two wrongs don't make a right. But again, this is but one editor's opinion. Try not to take one's conflicting opinion so personally. This was not a judgement about you, I just disagree is all. Have a nice night.
1623:. The section can easily be expanded to included statements from Shaffir, Kreischer (including Kreischer's statement regarding choosing not to release the podcast due to the implication of a crime being committed) and Kreischer's wife (Your Mom's House with Christina P. Ep. 1 Thursday October 3, 2019 with LeeAnn Kreischer: "in the lead up, Ari dosed Bert for an episode of "The Bertcast" so we hear LeeAnn's reaction in full"). But why bother? We're simply discussing one line. Not a lengthy section full of detailed paragraphs that need multiple sources to back contentious claims.
1211:
748:
1570:
open about this. Much like the story of Ari slipping Molly to
Kreischer, both have talked at length about their drug use and alcohol use on many podcasts." In one statement he's saying it is not known enough for inclusion, then he's saying it is known enough to state it on the Talk Page. These two comedians are known for stand-up and podcasts. If the coverage of "said event" is by podcast, the main RS will be as such. WP allows YouTube clips to stand as RS when it comes to video and audio reference claims. I showed the most obvious:
736:
1611:-sensitive claim? Come on. If the subject himself is perfectly fine talking about it at length on various media outlets and admitting to the act, other comedians interview the subjects involved, and media publications actually print the action; where is the "expectionalism"? Stop moving the ball. It's one line: "In 2019, Shaffir spiked fellow comedian Bert Kreischer's drink with MDMA, leading to a falling out between Shaffir and Kreischer's family." If you'd like me to change it to: "In 2019, Shaffir
828:
800:
963:
1619:, or the fact that the editor just has a problem with this one single inclusion, for whatever reason. He originally wrote: "If others weigh-in and agree with you, good, you've got the consensus you were looking for and can for it." Well, they did. By continually attempting to add this very well-known incident regarding the BLP; they formed a consensus to include. But this one editor kept removing it based on one complaint: RS. On the Talk Page it's notability; and now
927:
1679:. Third, there isn’t a common statement of what (if anything) happened so what to propose here would be problematic. And lastly it is just not biographically significant. This isn’t a major life choice, nor an event that altered his life, nor something that was an enduring large portion of years. I wouldn’t be against trivia about how the life is lived, but making WP about detailing sleazy incidents just seems making WP less reputable. Cheers
446:
428:
838:
975:
456:
658:
939:
630:
772:
544:
668:
526:
1506:
accused of edit-warring, I have added a request for comment to this talk page discussion. I would really like to know if simply speaking about something on podcasts is enough to establish notability and relevancy and to warrant inclusion in a BLP, particularly if the subject matter is arguably contentious in nature since it deals with illegal activity. If citing podcasts is enough to warrant inclusion, so be it.
400:
1025:
1007:
554:
338:
314:
283:
1300:
1167:
1035:
190:
1468:. I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince you when a simple Google search will supply you with multiple sources. It's known by comics, fans, etc. Last, this subject is known exclusively for these two controversies. It's brought up time and again in referencing him (as can be seen in the 2020 sources provided). My question to you is: why are
1283:? Kreischer missed a scheduled flight because of the "prank" and his wife wanted to press charges against Shaffir. Kreischer has been pretty vocal about the incident in interviews and podcasts. Shaffir even went on Instagram denouncing Sober October month and saying that he placed the molly in Kreischer's drink as revenge. Thoughts?
348:
1491:
level? I disagreed with your initial suggestion and your response to my post started with "first of all" and ended with "nice try though." Then I responded and ended my next response with wishing you a nice night and you presumed that this was somehow an attempt to "sweep away the conversation". I've
1574:
the 3 comedians - Shaffir, Kreischer and Segura talking about the incident in full detail and admitting to what happened. If you'd like another means of representation for that podcast, I'll provide. But the outcome will be the same to back the claim. I also presented 4 sources that show present day
1496:
information and that consensus is not up to a "vote" and still relies on "respecting
Knowledge's policies and guidelines" and your response was "Nope" and to tell me to "stop trying to look for reasons" and how you "aren't going to waste time." Then you went on to suggest that I might be related to
1455:
Nope. You're the only one who feels it should be left out of this article. Gain the consensus that agrees with your specific point of view on this exact matter; and it can be removed. Until then, it remains on the basis that more have attempted to include it than your one attempt to remove it. Plain
1393:
have no bearing here at all. The BLPs in question rely heavily on certain means of media that are represented in their careers; as you yourself state: "podcasts". You questioned: "I was not a contributor to that section, so I'm not sure why you addressed that to me or how it negates my argument." In
1349:
is sourced by
Twitter and "The Jerusalem Post" completely disqualifies any argument you just cited via WP policy. The fact that you just wrote: "They are a couple of drug-taking, hard-drinking comedians" is contentious material for a BLP on WP; and I would not disqualify the actions on your opinion.
1706:
and uploaded on 's WILD RIDE. How can you possibly defend half the trivial content in this article: "He cites Bill Burr as his favorite living comedian. In 2010 Shaffir appeared on the 3rd episode of the Joe Rogan
Experience. Every 50 episodes the comedy team Danish and O’Neill appear as guests. He
1569:
keeps changing his mode of contest and challenge. First he asks for RS. When he gets them, he changes his approach to "not-notabile". Then when he himself states: "I'm not sure if you follow Ari, but his drug-taking is well known by those who do, as is
Kreischer's heavy drinking. They are both very
1697:
There isn't a common statement? Did you even read the above? the sources? listen to the BLPs involved? Come on. The statement is as common as it gets. "Ari
Shaffir slipped Bert Kreischer a Molly." Both subjects have stated it countless times; and every single person in the industry that interviews
1364:
I also agree the that the controversy section is poorly sourced. I was not a contributor to that section, so I'm not sure why you addressed that to me or how it negates my argument. If you think the existing info there should be removed, you won't hear any disagreement from me. I'm just an editor,
1702:
life choice. It did alter his life and those around him. I cannot accept anything you're saying. It sounds like you didn't even read the sources or listen to the re-telling by those who it affected. It ruined his friendships and cost him the trust of his colleagues; who still talk about it today.
1505:
might disagree with including this information, otherwise you would have simply made your edit in the first place, instead of asking for opinions on the article's talk page, no? In any event, since the only people weighing-in on this is yourself and myself, and since I have no interest in being
1472:
against including this? Are you associated with the subject? It's only one line. That's all. Not undue weight. Not excessive content. Nothing. Just one line backed by sources; which you asked for. Now you're bringing up policy. Sorry. The sources back the content stated. And if you question or
1412:
Hello again, Mainartists: I would like to understand why you feel this information is relevant. You've also mentioned during your original talk page post and your recent edit summary that this information is "well-known": It was my understanding that relevancy and notability was established by
1736:
allegation that the subject of a BLP allegedly committed a crime - are considerably stricter than podcasts and the sources presently used in the article for this very serious allegation of a crime. Quite frankly, this content should have already been removed, until consensus is achieved for
1473:
challenge, then you best be ready to do the same for nearly all of the content in this article based on your "policy" defense. Until you gain consensus to remove it; or other editors on the article page feel the same to remove it (which you're the only that seems the need to), it remains.
1419:
While information must be verifiable to be included in an article, not all verifiable information needs to be included in an article. Consensus may determine that certain information does not improve an article, and that it should be omitted or presented instead in a different article.
1644:
For the record. All three comedians in question, including the BLP subject, utilize not only
Podcast links as RS but YouTube links as well in their WP articles. On this page specifically, RS #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, (#8 / #9 deadlinks) #10, #11, #12 etc are
1398:. Plain and simple. That is and was my entire direction for inclusion. I hardly took anything personal. I have yet to accept a strong argument except that of your personal opinion; which as we both know does not make for good article writing at WP.
1384:
does not apply here. The fact that you yourself state: " drug-taking is well known by those who do, as is
Kreischer's heavy drinking" negates any libel content that I might introduce to the article by way of this particular situation. In keeping,
1703:"Nor something that was an enduring large portion of years"? There are only two things that Shaffir is remembered for regarding controveries: Kobe Bryant and Bert Kreischer. As of 4 days ago, it was still being talked about:
153:
1925:
1413:
whether or not the information was reported on by reliable third-party sources. In your initial talk page post you stated this was mentioned in "interviews". Perhaps we can cite those? In addition, as per
1649:
interviews / podcasts with the BLP. This should assuage the question posed: "If citing podcasts is enough to warrant inclusion, so be it" and also counter the defense that my RS need to be "third-party".
952:
810:
781:
644:
1745:. In my view, this is disputed content, because it is not merely an incident (as the section currently states), but rather a serious allegation of a crime being committed by the subject of this BLP.
1440:
If I'm misinterpreting these policies I would truly like to understand: Can you point me to actual verbiage from
Knowledge's policies and procedures that support your point of view on the matter?
1547:-sensitive claim, so high-quality sourcing is needed, but it's hard to discuss this further without having a list of the sources the dispute focuses on and the text they would be used to cite. --
761:
640:
210:
1825:
1698:
them about it says the exact same thing. Plus, I provided sources that back the "common" statement. Do you want more? It is not sensationalism or tabloidism considering the source. It is a
1935:
1900:
1109:
I will keep on correcting aris birth year, I’m not sure if this is the way to suggest this or not but perhaps an admin would consider locking edits to stop this continuous vandalism
868:
1950:
1820:
262:
1920:
1845:
911:
885:
502:
1930:
1895:
1940:
1905:
1885:
1707:
became a New York resident in 2015. " So? Nothing - absolutely nothing - in this article is "widely covered by third parties" so I reject that as a reason to exclude.
1380:
By saying "Have a good night" does not sweep away the conversation. Your point of debate and statements of rebuttal actually do not promote your case. Your citing of
147:
1875:
720:
917:
508:
1890:
1860:
606:
1955:
1945:
1810:
267:
1970:
1960:
1915:
1850:
1840:
1081:
875:
726:
250:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
220:
79:
1880:
612:
1910:
1870:
1615:
spiking fellow comedian Bert Kreischer ..." I will. But let's stick with one contestable objection and be done with it. Either it's RS, notability,
880:
478:
1835:
1815:
1087:
366:
242:
1456:
and simple. As for interviews, stop trying to look for reasons. Kreischer has been interviewed dozens of times on the subject, so has his wife:
1865:
1855:
1830:
696:
85:
1975:
1965:
988:
814:
370:
851:
805:
582:
469:
433:
44:
863:
374:
1580:
1195:
1057:
365:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1584:
1487:
I don't understand the need to be so curt in your language and tone. Is there no way that we can keep this conversation on a more
681:
635:
1228:
409:
361:
324:
319:
99:
30:
1512:
1446:
1371:
1336:
1269:
1246:
567:
531:
104:
20:
859:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1770:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1315:
168:
74:
1501:
and that I am attempting to understand where I am wrong about this. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you must have suspected
1048:
1012:
294:
135:
1577:
Cageside Press. Quote: “... despite his habitual line stepping (like drugging his friend with MDMA)" January 30, 2020.
1780:
1498:
65:
477:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1218:
753:
1588:
196:
282:
129:
1784:
1173:
251:
109:
1199:
1792:
1712:
1655:
1628:
1478:
1435:
Decision making and reaching consensus involve an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns,
1403:
1355:
1288:
1148:
1684:
1620:
1616:
1604:
1540:
980:
300:
125:
1680:
1753:
843:
461:
261:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
1585:
The Comic’s Comic. Quote: “Even Bert’s own kids know Ari once drugged their dad.” February 9, 2020.
1144:
189:
1552:
1460:, so has Shaffir himself. Other comedians have talked about it on their podcasts and online shows:
1426:
1225:
735:
175:
161:
55:
1314:
third-party sources. Sure, they talked about it on podcasts, but that doesn't necessarily make it
1056:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
695:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
581:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1676:
1488:
265:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
70:
1667:- pretty clear for multiple reasons. First it seems not widely covered by third parties so not
827:
799:
1279:
It is pretty well known that Shaffir placed a Molly in Kreischer's drink. Should this go under
1788:
1708:
1651:
1624:
1474:
1399:
1386:
1351:
1319:
1307:
1284:
1133:
944:
673:
51:
1422:
The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.
962:
353:
1743:
The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content
1581:
Pop Culture. Quote: "I stopped defending him when he slipped me Molly.” February 13, 2020.
1431:
Consensus on Knowledge does not mean unanimity (which is ideal but not always achievable),
1194:
add in 2019 he was dropped from his talent management for racist and insensitive comments.
1746:
1589:
BroBible. Quote: “Fresh off of drugging his good friend Bert Kreischer” January 28, 2020.
1576:
1390:
1381:
1327:
1323:
559:
258:
1596:
1465:
141:
926:
1738:
1548:
1414:
1222:
1114:
445:
427:
1804:
1729:
1672:
1668:
1608:
1566:
1544:
1507:
1441:
1366:
1331:
1264:
1125:
1040:
856:
474:
938:
399:
1311:
1129:
771:
1591:. I then added a continuance of other comedians still discussing the topic today:
657:
629:
24:
1675:
guidance is to avoid sensationalism and tabloidism especially so for possible
1492:
also directly quoted WP policies on how it is the onus of the editor trying to
1318:. They are a couple of drug-taking, hard-drinking comedians afterall. See also
543:
525:
337:
313:
1704:
1600:
1592:
1571:
1461:
1457:
1299:
1143:
Welp i didn't even required to constantly change date to lock this guy's page
1030:
970:
934:
833:
743:
691:
686:
663:
572:
549:
451:
343:
1110:
1024:
1006:
199:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
1306:
In my opinion this information would only be relevant if this incident had
855:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
577:
1034:
1497:
the subject. All I can do is assure you that I am coming at this from
1263:
Consensus was reached to exclude this information from the article.
1053:
1796:
1760:
1716:
1688:
1659:
1632:
1556:
1516:
1482:
1450:
1407:
1375:
1359:
1340:
1292:
1273:
1231:
1203:
1152:
1137:
1118:
373:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1601:"LeeAnn Kreischer on Bert's Dosing - So Over October Highlight"
1458:"LeeAnn Kreischer on Bert's Dosing - So Over October Highlight"
1161:
276:
257:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
234:
184:
15:
1787:
but I'm unable to find a reliable source which confirms.  –
961:
925:
770:
734:
398:
1732:. Our standards for inclusion of contentious material - a
1926:
Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
685:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
571:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
160:
1575:
relevancy to the topic still in the news as of 2020:
1437:
while respecting Knowledge's policies and guidelines.
1394:
my original posting I specifically cite the section:
1245:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
1052:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
473:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1255:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1086:This article has not yet received a rating on the
916:This article has not yet received a rating on the
725:This article has not yet received a rating on the
611:This article has not yet received a rating on the
507:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1826:Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1936:Unknown-importance American television articles
1901:Unknown-importance Southern California articles
1345:First of all, the fact that the entire section
1158:Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2020
1258:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1221:that support the change you want to be made.
174:
8:
1572:The Joe Rogan Experience #1358. October 2019
280:
1951:Unknown-importance North Carolina articles
1821:Start-Class biography (musicians) articles
1001:
794:
624:
520:
422:
308:
1921:Unknown-importance United States articles
1846:Unknown-importance New York City articles
1931:Start-Class American television articles
1896:Start-Class Southern California articles
1941:American television task force articles
1906:Southern California task force articles
1886:Unknown-importance Los Angeles articles
1003:
796:
626:
522:
424:
310:
1876:Unknown-importance California articles
1607:content due to an illegal action? and
1603:. Now Marchije wants to question the
1539:have up-top? Obviously it's both an
7:
1891:Los Angeles area task force articles
1861:Unknown-importance Maryland articles
1535:Can we get a list of the sources we
1046:This article is within the scope of
849:This article is within the scope of
679:This article is within the scope of
565:This article is within the scope of
467:This article is within the scope of
359:This article is within the scope of
1956:WikiProject North Carolina articles
1946:Start-Class North Carolina articles
1811:Biography articles of living people
896:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
487:Knowledge:WikiProject New York City
23:for discussing improvements to the
1971:Unknown-importance Comedy articles
1961:WikiProject United States articles
1916:Start-Class United States articles
1851:WikiProject New York City articles
1841:Start-Class New York City articles
1775:His father, the Holocaust survivor
899:Template:WikiProject United States
490:Template:WikiProject New York City
14:
1597:"Tigerbelly Clips with Bobby Lee"
1466:"Tigerbelly Clips with Bobby Lee"
1881:Start-Class Los Angeles articles
1766:The discussion above is closed.
1298:
1209:
1165:
1033:
1023:
1005:
973:
937:
836:
826:
798:
746:
705:Knowledge:WikiProject California
666:
656:
628:
552:
542:
524:
454:
444:
426:
346:
336:
312:
281:
240:This article must adhere to the
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1911:WikiProject California articles
1871:Start-Class California articles
1433:nor is it the result of a vote.
708:Template:WikiProject California
383:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
195:This article was nominated for
1836:WikiProject Biography articles
1816:Start-Class biography articles
1565:See, this is my problem here.
953:American television task force
782:Southern California task force
591:Knowledge:WikiProject Maryland
386:Template:WikiProject Biography
299:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1866:WikiProject Maryland articles
1856:Start-Class Maryland articles
1831:Musicians work group articles
1761:09:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
1717:21:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
1689:15:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
1660:00:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
1633:23:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
1557:21:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
1517:02:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
1483:01:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
1451:01:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
1060:and see a list of open tasks.
986:This article is supported by
950:This article is supported by
779:This article is supported by
759:This article is supported by
699:and see a list of open tasks.
594:Template:WikiProject Maryland
585:and see a list of open tasks.
481:and see a list of open tasks.
407:This article is supported by
243:biographies of living persons
42:Put new text under old text.
1797:19:22, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
1232:03:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
1204:02:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
1153:17:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
1138:19:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
1128:requesting page protection.
1119:01:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
1066:Knowledge:WikiProject Comedy
371:contribute to the discussion
1976:WikiProject Comedy articles
1966:Start-Class Comedy articles
1599:and even Kreischer's wife:
1408:02:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
1376:01:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
1360:00:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
1341:22:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1293:20:36, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1188:to reactivate your request.
1176:has been answered. Set the
1069:Template:WikiProject Comedy
762:Los Angeles area task force
255:must be removed immediately
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1992:
1088:project's importance scale
989:WikiProject North Carolina
918:project's importance scale
754:Greater Los Angeles portal
727:project's importance scale
613:project's importance scale
509:project's importance scale
1274:01:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
1124:I have added an entry at
1085:
1018:
969:
933:
915:
852:WikiProject United States
821:
778:
742:
724:
651:
610:
537:
506:
470:WikiProject New York City
439:
406:
331:
307:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1768:Please do not modify it.
1252:Please do not modify it.
857:United States of America
1783:podcast, the man said
1593:Theo von Podcast #268"
1462:Theo von Podcast #268"
966:
930:
902:United States articles
775:
739:
682:WikiProject California
493:New York City articles
403:
289:This article is rated
209:, August 25 2009, see
75:avoid personal attacks
981:North Carolina portal
965:
929:
774:
738:
410:WikiProject Musicians
402:
362:WikiProject Biography
100:Neutral point of view
1308:significant coverage
844:United States portal
568:WikiProject Maryland
462:New York City portal
105:No original research
1247:request for comment
870:Articles Requested!
711:California articles
645:Southern California
1785:this is his father
1350:Nice try, though.
1049:WikiProject Comedy
967:
931:
776:
740:
404:
389:biography articles
295:content assessment
219:, May 5 2006, see
86:dispute resolution
47:
1192:
1191:
1102:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1000:
999:
996:
995:
945:Television portal
793:
792:
789:
788:
674:California portal
623:
622:
619:
618:
597:Maryland articles
519:
518:
515:
514:
421:
420:
417:
416:
275:
274:
233:
232:
229:
228:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1983:
1302:
1254:
1219:reliable sources
1213:
1212:
1183:
1179:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1064:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1027:
1020:
1019:
1009:
1002:
983:
978:
977:
976:
947:
942:
941:
904:
903:
900:
897:
894:
846:
841:
840:
839:
830:
823:
822:
817:
802:
795:
756:
751:
750:
749:
713:
712:
709:
706:
703:
676:
671:
670:
669:
660:
653:
652:
647:
632:
625:
599:
598:
595:
592:
589:
562:
557:
556:
555:
546:
539:
538:
528:
521:
495:
494:
491:
488:
485:
464:
459:
458:
457:
448:
441:
440:
430:
423:
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
367:join the project
356:
354:Biography portal
351:
350:
349:
340:
333:
332:
327:
316:
309:
292:
286:
285:
277:
263:this noticeboard
235:
201:
200:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1991:
1990:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1801:
1800:
1777:
1772:
1771:
1737:inclusion. Per
1515:
1449:
1374:
1339:
1276:
1272:
1250:
1240:
1217:please provide
1210:
1181:
1177:
1166:
1160:
1107:
1072:Comedy articles
1071:
1068:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1039:
1032:
979:
974:
972:
943:
936:
901:
898:
895:
892:
891:
890:
876:Become a Member
842:
837:
835:
808:
752:
747:
745:
710:
707:
704:
701:
700:
672:
667:
665:
638:
596:
593:
590:
587:
586:
560:Maryland portal
558:
553:
551:
492:
489:
486:
483:
482:
460:
455:
453:
388:
385:
382:
379:
378:
352:
347:
345:
322:
293:on Knowledge's
290:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1989:
1987:
1979:
1978:
1973:
1968:
1963:
1958:
1953:
1948:
1943:
1938:
1933:
1928:
1923:
1918:
1913:
1908:
1903:
1898:
1893:
1888:
1883:
1878:
1873:
1868:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1843:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1803:
1802:
1776:
1773:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1692:
1691:
1662:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1621:WP:EXCEPTIONAL
1617:WP:EXCEPTIONAL
1605:WP:EXCEPTIONAL
1560:
1559:
1541:WP:EXCEPTIONAL
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1511:
1445:
1370:
1335:
1277:
1268:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1241:
1239:
1238:Bert Kreischer
1236:
1235:
1234:
1190:
1189:
1170:
1159:
1156:
1141:
1140:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1084:
1078:
1077:
1075:
1058:the discussion
1045:
1044:
1028:
1016:
1015:
1010:
998:
997:
994:
993:
985:
984:
968:
958:
957:
949:
948:
932:
922:
921:
914:
908:
907:
905:
889:
888:
883:
878:
873:
866:
864:Template Usage
860:
848:
847:
831:
819:
818:
815:North Carolina
803:
791:
790:
787:
786:
777:
767:
766:
758:
757:
741:
731:
730:
723:
717:
716:
714:
697:the discussion
678:
677:
661:
649:
648:
633:
621:
620:
617:
616:
609:
603:
602:
600:
583:the discussion
564:
563:
547:
535:
534:
529:
517:
516:
513:
512:
505:
499:
498:
496:
479:the discussion
466:
465:
449:
437:
436:
431:
419:
418:
415:
414:
405:
395:
394:
392:
358:
357:
341:
329:
328:
317:
305:
304:
298:
287:
273:
272:
268:this help page
252:poorly sourced
238:
231:
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
214:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1988:
1977:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1967:
1964:
1962:
1959:
1957:
1954:
1952:
1949:
1947:
1944:
1942:
1939:
1937:
1934:
1932:
1929:
1927:
1924:
1922:
1919:
1917:
1914:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1904:
1902:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1889:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1869:
1867:
1864:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1808:
1806:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1774:
1769:
1762:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1744:
1740:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1724:
1723:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1705:
1701:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1500:
1495:
1490:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1448:
1443:
1439:
1438:
1434:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1416:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1275:
1271:
1266:
1259:
1256:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1242:
1237:
1233:
1230:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1187:
1184:parameter to
1175:
1171:
1164:
1163:
1157:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1104:
1089:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1042:
1041:Comedy portal
1036:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1004:
991:
990:
982:
971:
964:
960:
959:
955:
954:
946:
940:
935:
928:
924:
923:
919:
913:
910:
909:
906:
893:United States
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
872:
871:
867:
865:
862:
861:
858:
854:
853:
845:
834:
832:
829:
825:
824:
820:
816:
812:
807:
806:United States
804:
801:
797:
784:
783:
773:
769:
768:
764:
763:
755:
744:
737:
733:
732:
728:
722:
719:
718:
715:
698:
694:
693:
688:
684:
683:
675:
664:
662:
659:
655:
654:
650:
646:
642:
637:
634:
631:
627:
614:
608:
605:
604:
601:
584:
580:
579:
574:
570:
569:
561:
550:
548:
545:
541:
540:
536:
533:
530:
527:
523:
510:
504:
501:
500:
497:
484:New York City
480:
476:
475:New York City
472:
471:
463:
452:
450:
447:
443:
442:
438:
435:
434:New York City
432:
429:
425:
412:
411:
401:
397:
396:
393:
376:
375:documentation
372:
368:
364:
363:
355:
344:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
326:
321:
318:
315:
311:
306:
302:
296:
288:
284:
279:
278:
270:
269:
264:
260:
256:
253:
249:
245:
244:
239:
237:
236:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1789:Skywatcher68
1781:Skeptic Tank
1778:
1767:
1755:
1754:
1748:
1747:
1742:
1733:
1725:
1709:Maineartists
1699:
1664:
1652:Maineartists
1646:
1641:
1625:Maineartists
1612:
1536:
1502:
1493:
1475:Maineartists
1469:
1436:
1432:
1430:
1427:WP:Consensus
1421:
1418:
1400:Maineartists
1395:
1352:Maineartists
1346:
1303:
1285:Maineartists
1280:
1278:
1257:
1251:
1244:
1214:
1193:
1185:
1174:edit request
1142:
1108:
1047:
987:
951:
881:Project Talk
869:
850:
780:
760:
690:
680:
576:
566:
468:
408:
360:
301:WikiProjects
266:
254:
247:
241:
217:no consensus
216:
206:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1681:Markbassett
1677:WP:BLPCRIME
1671:. Second,
1613:admitted to
1425:And as per
1396:Controversy
1347:Controversy
1281:Controversy
1196:172.250.4.4
641:Los Angeles
291:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
25:Ari Shaffir
1805:Categories
1749:Isaidnoway
1499:good faith
1387:WP:NOTNEWS
1330:. Cheers!
1320:WP:NOTNEWS
1178:|answered=
811:Television
702:California
692:California
687:U.S. state
636:California
573:U.S. state
221:discussion
211:discussion
1549:Aquillion
1229:(contrib)
1223:Eggishorn
1215:Not done:
1145:Myserl100
1105:Vandalism
380:Biography
325:Musicians
320:Biography
259:libellous
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1567:Marchije
1508:Marchije
1442:Marchije
1391:WP:CRIME
1382:WP:LIBEL
1367:Marchije
1332:Marchije
1328:WP:CRIME
1324:WP:LIBEL
1312:reliable
1304:Disagree
1265:Marchije
588:Maryland
578:Maryland
532:Maryland
197:deletion
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1779:In his
1739:WP:ONUS
1734:serious
1726:Exclude
1665:Exclude
1642:SOURCES
1503:someone
1415:WP:ONUS
1316:notable
1130:Loopy30
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1756:(talk)
1730:WP:BLP
1728:- per
1673:WP:BLP
1669:WP:DUE
1609:WP:BLP
1545:WP:BLP
1389:&
1226:(talk)
1126:WP:RPP
1063:Comedy
1054:comedy
1013:Comedy
886:Alerts
297:scale.
207:delete
126:Google
1700:major
1489:civil
1182:|ans=
1172:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1793:talk
1713:talk
1685:talk
1656:talk
1629:talk
1553:talk
1543:and
1513:peek
1479:talk
1447:peek
1404:talk
1372:peek
1356:talk
1337:peek
1289:talk
1270:peek
1200:talk
1149:talk
1134:talk
1115:talk
1111:Unoc
369:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1647:all
1595:",
1494:add
1470:you
1464:",
1310:by
1180:or
1082:???
912:???
721:???
689:of
607:???
575:of
503:???
248:BLP
176:TWL
1807::
1795:)
1741:-
1715:)
1687:)
1658:)
1631:)
1587:,
1583:,
1579:,
1555:)
1537:do
1510:•/
1481:)
1444:•/
1429::
1417::
1406:)
1369:•/
1358:)
1334:•/
1326:,
1322:,
1291:)
1267:•/
1249:.
1202:)
1186:no
1151:)
1136:)
1117:)
813:/
809::
643:/
639::
323::
156:)
54:;
1791:(
1711:(
1683:(
1654:(
1627:(
1551:(
1477:(
1402:(
1354:(
1287:(
1198:(
1147:(
1132:(
1113:(
1090:.
992:.
956:.
920:.
785:.
765:.
729:.
615:.
511:.
413:.
377:.
303:.
271:.
246:(
223:.
213:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
