Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Arrangements between railroads

Source đź“ť

312: 74: 53: 336: 178: 192: 158: 22: 84: 370: 494: 453:
the North Eastern south of York station. Thus a train from King's Cross to Aberdeen used running powers three times. That train would be hauled by locomotives from all three companies (changing at York and Waverley), the coaches came from a pool of East Coast Joint Stock, and revenues were divided up between all three companies.
206: 452:
The North British had running powers over the Caledonian from Kinnaber Junction to Aberdeen. The North Eastern had running powers over the North British from Berwick-upon-Tweed to Edinburgh Waverley, avoiding the need for a loco change. The Great Northern had running powers over a short section of
476:"Trackage rights" has been classified as a stub and I do not see any activities or discussion going on to expand it. On a minor note, the page has been linked falsely to non-corresponding WP pages in other languages more than once. Therefore I propose merging "Trackage rights" into this article. 456:
All very complicated, but this was only one example. Even after the Grouping, the LNER would not be able to serve Huddersfield without running powers, and many lines were jointly owned. Not sure how to explain it
428:
It's inaccurate anyway. Railtrack was a PLC, and was run on a profits basis (although it ultimately failed). The current company, Network Rail, is a non-profit company with the UK Government as the sole
559: 130: 321: 168: 554: 574: 272: 569: 140: 410:< In 1997 the British Railways network was privatized as a single company Railtrack, and after this proved a total failure as a non-profit company : --> 282: 311: 579: 564: 106: 584: 477: 244: 240: 458: 430: 414: 97: 58: 236: 227: 163: 33: 386: 515: 344: 105:
articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
449:
There were a vast number of situations where running powers existed on UK railways. Here is a typical example.
536: 481: 39: 21: 418: 462: 434: 503: 348: 396: 389:
on 6 December 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
382: 532: 177: 73: 52: 511: 540: 519: 485: 466: 438: 422: 89: 335: 232: 191: 157: 548: 248: 215: 507: 531:
This article totally fails to mention open access as mandated by current EU law
79: 83: 102: 235:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can visit the
205: 364: 15: 334: 310: 231:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 239:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 391: 377: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 293: 8: 560:Low-importance WikiProject Business articles 395:; for the discussion at that location, see 19: 501: 290: 152: 47: 555:Start-Class WikiProject Business articles 575:High-importance rail transport articles 413:Does 'total failure' comply with NPOV? 154: 49: 7: 225:This article is within the scope of 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Business 95:This article is within the scope of 570:Start-Class rail transport articles 294:Associated projects or task forces: 38:It is of interest to the following 257:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trains 14: 492: 368: 204: 190: 176: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 277:This article has been rated as 135:This article has been rated as 580:Operations task force articles 445:Running powers extensive in UK 387:Arrangements between railroads 343:This article lacks sufficient 1: 565:WikiProject Business articles 319:This article is supported by 245:WikiProject Trains to do list 121:WikiProject Business articles 118:Template:WikiProject Business 109:and see a list of open tasks. 585:All WikiProject Trains pages 520:15:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 486:14:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC) 467:22:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC) 439:22:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC) 260:Template:WikiProject Trains 601: 541:23:37, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 283:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 423:00:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC) 342: 322:the Operations task force 318: 289: 276: 185: 134: 67: 46: 263:rail transport articles 339: 315: 28:This article is rated 375:The contents of the 338: 314: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 98:WikiProject Business 340: 316: 228:WikiProject Trains 34:content assessment 522: 506:comment added by 403: 402: 363: 362: 359: 358: 355: 354: 329: 328: 223: 222: 151: 150: 147: 146: 592: 500: 496: 495: 394: 372: 371: 365: 349:inline citations 347:and/or adequate 301: 291: 265: 264: 261: 258: 255: 208: 199: 198: 194: 187: 186: 181: 180: 179: 174: 171: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 600: 599: 595: 594: 593: 591: 590: 589: 545: 544: 529: 493: 491: 474: 472:Merger proposal 447: 408: 390: 378:Trackage rights 369: 299: 279:High-importance 262: 259: 256: 253: 252: 224: 210: 209: 175: 173:High‑importance 172: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 90:Business portal 88: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 598: 596: 588: 587: 582: 577: 572: 567: 562: 557: 547: 546: 533:Hobbitschuster 528: 525: 524: 523: 478:77.184.182.156 473: 470: 446: 443: 442: 441: 429:shareholder.-- 407: 404: 401: 400: 373: 361: 360: 357: 356: 353: 352: 341: 331: 330: 327: 326: 317: 307: 306: 304: 302: 296: 295: 287: 286: 275: 269: 268: 266: 233:rail transport 221: 220: 211: 203: 202: 197: 195: 183: 182: 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 597: 586: 583: 581: 578: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 561: 558: 556: 553: 552: 550: 543: 542: 538: 534: 526: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 499: 490: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 471: 469: 468: 464: 460: 459:86.160.129.89 454: 450: 444: 440: 436: 432: 431:86.160.129.89 427: 426: 425: 424: 420: 416: 415:86.182.43.220 411: 405: 398: 397:its talk page 393: 388: 384: 380: 379: 374: 367: 366: 350: 346: 337: 333: 332: 324: 323: 313: 309: 308: 305: 303: 298: 297: 292: 288: 284: 280: 274: 271: 270: 267: 250: 249:Trains Portal 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 219: 218: 217: 216:Trains Portal 212: 207: 201: 200: 196: 193: 189: 188: 184: 170: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 530: 502:— Preceding 497: 475: 455: 451: 448: 412: 409: 376: 320: 278: 243:. See also: 237:project page 226: 214: 213: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 527:Open access 392:its history 30:Start-class 549:Categories 381:page were 345:references 241:discussion 169:Operations 457:though.-- 516:contribs 504:unsigned 406:Untitled 247:and the 112:Business 103:business 59:Business 508:Klbrain 281:on the 139:on the 383:merged 254:Trains 164:Trains 36:scale. 385:into 537:talk 512:talk 498:Done 482:talk 463:talk 435:talk 419:talk 273:High 131:Low 551:: 539:) 518:) 514:• 484:) 465:) 437:) 421:) 300:/ 167:: 535:( 510:( 480:( 461:( 433:( 417:( 399:. 351:. 325:. 285:. 251:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Business
WikiProject icon
icon
Business portal
WikiProject Business
business
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Trains
Operations
WikiProject icon

Trains Portal
WikiProject Trains
rail transport
project page
discussion
WikiProject Trains to do list
Trains Portal
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Operations task force
Note icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑