Knowledge

Talk:Asymmetric relation

Source πŸ“

84: 74: 53: 22: 360:
is. I think this needs to be remedied. Asymmetric relation has two definitions; which one of these, if any, corresponds with the definition of a nonsymmetric relation? I too dislike redirects to articles that have no mention at all of the first
420:
does not. From the point of view of symmetry, any pattern is possible for a given couple. The non-symmetric property of xRy is defined taken advantage of NOR connector (either symmetric or antisymmetric but neither both nor none) as:
166:
to asymmetric. However, they deleted the article without including anything about nonsymmetric relations. So here is the deleted part. Apparently he thought it look wierd and deleted it. Way to go. That's a great way to do things.
364:
Gregbard, the notation used in your formula looks rather non-standard (the universal quantifier seems to be implicit), and even so I don't think the formula makes sense because you are quantifying over the same variables
140: 522: 502: 482: 462: 369: 314: 294: 254: 234: 274: 442: 214: 571: 130: 566: 106: 97: 58: 416:
relation occurs when, in the same context U (being U a finite set; and x and y elements of U), some couples <x,y: -->
33: 21: 551: 546: 343: 394: 357: 163: 39: 83: 398: 353: 338: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
541: 379: 333: 89: 73: 52: 507: 487: 467: 447: 299: 279: 239: 219: 259: 427: 199: 560: 375: 168: 102: 383: 171: 79: 370:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive 28#Negation of definitions
405: 182: 15: 368:
My searching reveals that the matter was discussed in
510: 490: 470: 450: 430: 302: 282: 262: 242: 222: 202: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 516: 496: 476: 456: 436: 308: 288: 268: 248: 228: 208: 418:, too; there are also cases where <x,y: --> 8: 19: 47: 509: 489: 469: 449: 429: 301: 281: 261: 241: 221: 201: 49: 532:"x loves y", "x is the brother of y" 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 352:True there is currently nothing in 38:It is of interest to the following 511: 491: 471: 451: 324:"x loves y", "is the brother of" 303: 283: 243: 223: 14: 572:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 567:Start-Class mathematics articles 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 431: 417:of R do exist and <y,x: --> 203: 1: 384:17:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 172:23:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 588: 419:do exist but <y,x: --> 134: 67: 46: 517:{\displaystyle \exists } 497:{\displaystyle \exists } 477:{\displaystyle \exists } 457:{\displaystyle \exists } 309:{\displaystyle \exists } 289:{\displaystyle \exists } 249:{\displaystyle \exists } 229:{\displaystyle \exists } 193:relation is defined as: 141:project's priority scale 269:{\displaystyle \wedge } 98:WikiProject Mathematics 547:antisymmetric relation 518: 498: 478: 458: 438: 344:antisymmetric relation 310: 290: 270: 250: 230: 210: 28:This article is rated 519: 499: 479: 459: 439: 395:nonsymmetric relation 358:nonsymmetric relation 356:that explains what a 311: 291: 271: 251: 231: 211: 164:nonsymmetric relation 552:homegeneous relation 508: 488: 468: 448: 437:{\displaystyle \to } 428: 300: 280: 260: 240: 220: 209:{\displaystyle \to } 200: 121:mathematics articles 399:asymmetric relation 354:asymmetric relation 339:asymmetric relation 162:Someone redirected 542:symmetric relation 514: 494: 474: 454: 434: 334:symmetric relation 306: 286: 266: 246: 226: 206: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 579: 523: 521: 520: 515: 503: 501: 500: 495: 483: 481: 480: 475: 463: 461: 460: 455: 443: 441: 440: 435: 315: 313: 312: 307: 295: 293: 292: 287: 275: 273: 272: 267: 255: 253: 252: 247: 235: 233: 232: 227: 215: 213: 212: 207: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 587: 586: 582: 581: 580: 578: 577: 576: 557: 556: 538: 530: 506: 505: 486: 485: 466: 465: 446: 445: 426: 425: 392: 349: 348: 330: 322: 298: 297: 278: 277: 258: 257: 238: 237: 218: 217: 198: 197: 191:partimsymmetric 178: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 585: 583: 575: 574: 569: 559: 558: 555: 554: 549: 544: 537: 534: 529: 526: 513: 493: 473: 453: 433: 401:is the same. 391: 388: 387: 386: 372: 366: 362: 347: 346: 341: 336: 329: 326: 321: 318: 305: 285: 265: 245: 225: 205: 187:nonsymmetrical 179: 176: 175: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 584: 573: 570: 568: 565: 564: 562: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 539: 535: 533: 527: 525: 422: 415: 411: 410:non-symmetric 407: 402: 400: 396: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 331: 327: 325: 319: 317: 263: 194: 192: 188: 184: 174: 173: 170: 165: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 531: 423: 413: 409: 403: 393: 390:nonsymmetric 323: 195: 190: 186: 180: 177:Deleted Part 161: 158:nonsymmetric 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 484:y)(yRx)NOR( 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 561:Categories 524:y)(~yRx)) 424:(x)(y)(xRy 414:asymmetric 316:y)(~Ryx)) 196:(x)(y)(Rxy 536:See also 528:Examples 376:Egriffin 361:article. 328:See also 320:Examples 169:Gregbard 412:or the 256:y)(Ryx) 139:on the 408:, the 365:twice. 185:, the 36:scale. 406:Logic 183:logic 397:and 380:talk 504:x)( 464:x)( 404:In 296:x)( 236:x)( 189:or 181:In 131:Low 563:: 512:βˆƒ 492:βˆƒ 472:βˆƒ 452:βˆƒ 444:(( 432:β†’ 382:) 374:-- 304:βˆƒ 284:βˆƒ 264:∧ 244:βˆƒ 224:βˆƒ 216:(( 204:β†’ 378:( 276:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
nonsymmetric relation
Gregbard
23:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
logic
symmetric relation
asymmetric relation
antisymmetric relation
asymmetric relation
nonsymmetric relation
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive 28#Negation of definitions
Egriffin
talk
17:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
nonsymmetric relation
asymmetric relation
Logic
symmetric relation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑