Knowledge

Talk:BC150

Source đź“ť

261:
Pacific Northwest part of Canada; the Colony of VI might still have ruled the mainland, just maybe, but without the influx of Confederationists BC never would have been part of Canada; it was also a significant colony in a population/economic exploitation sense, which Vancouver Islnd wasn't ; there's a big difference of a colony of a few hundred souls and one of many thousands; the comparison would be something like the Falklands or other low-population colonies. i think it's only or that the 60th anniversary of the Island Colony be celebrated in 2009. just for the record, in terms of internal BC goings-on, '71 was a blip; the key dates are '58 and '85 (completion of the CPR and affirmation of the confederation deal). i.e. in terms of significant
252:
provincehood, the Peace River Block and a chunk of the North-Western Territory (the rest of which is now the yukon/nwt). it also happens, this time round, to be the 200th snniversary of simon fraser's trip down the Fraser, the 25th of alex mackenie's trip to Bella Coola, and the 230th anniversary of the visit of captain cook, and what the hell let's throw in whatever happened in 1778 (uite a bit, actully). So the 50 thing is just one of several potential meaningless events....I disagree that the creation of the
156: 90: 80: 22: 53: 206:
someone with more access to BC local media can eyeball this or keep it on their watchlist; events and news related to this are more likely to turn up in the smalltown weeklies than in the Big Dailies......(who ignored it all last year, to hte point where the public-recognition on the "event"'s name is probably pretty thin....and it's a hell of a tacky name, too, but oh-so-BC, though, huh?).
226:
with the capital at Victoria. (Or you could perhaps say that the province began in 1849, with the founding of the Crown Colony of Vancouver Island which was the first precursor to today's province -- except that the provincial government neglected to organise any celebrations in 1999 to mark that 150th anniversary.)
260:
and the lesser one - nominal really only, of the Charlottes, would have survived; and it was because of the gross costs of subsidixing the Mainland Colony that what went down in 87 went down at all; without 58 there never would have been the tide of Canadians and maritimers bent on making the British
188:
This appears to originate with a govt/consultant-type author, hence hte funny bolding/format and the overall writing style; my reason for coming to the talkpage just now is that scanning it over it appears that some of the historical detail is "off", such as the circumstances of the Mainland Colony's
233:
The purpose of this article is to make it clear that (i) the "BC 150" programme is founded on a rather flimsy historical foundation as the basis for a feel-good series of public events and government grants in advance of the 2010 Olympics, and that (ii) the anniversary it marks is in fact the 150th
225:
The problem with the "BC 150" commemoration is that it isn't the 150th anniversary of the present-day province of British Columbia. That anniversary will be in 2016, 150 years after the three parts of today's province were merged into one political jurisdiction with the same boundaries as today and
251:
This is an obfuscation born in WaC Bennett's day with the BC Centennial of 1858; we hd yet another in 66 and another in '71 and you're right, the mainland colony was the third constituent part of what became the province after being a united colony for a while, plus the Stikine Territory and, upon
205:
it's being, er, celebrated.....as with all BC-related political/org articles, pov-watch and brochure-watch should be vigilantly kept here; I'm just waking up so am not going to bother with the overdone boldings just now; I'll trim down the language/content but won't be able to watch page much; if
189:
creation.....the historical events this commemoration is supposedly for (really it's pre-Olympics hoo-hah) are certainly relevant to the article, but not in teh overall brochure-lecture here; this article isn't even about the sesquicentennial or whatever it's called; it's about
229:
Most of the government's "BC 150" advertising takes pains to avoid saying explicitly that 2008 is the 150th anniversary of the province, but the news media have generally drawn the mistaken inference that 2008 is indeed the province's sesquicentennial.
288:
In looking over this, and fixing the sloppy history that was throughout, I gave pause to wonder what this article is for; it's not about the programme of events/monuments/whatever, it's a re-hash of history already written up and titled as such, e.g.
394: 384: 136: 389: 265:
time periods/'realities/identity\. Confederation didn't come through on the deal until long after '71 for one thing...2008 is also t he 160th anniversary of
379: 146: 165: 63: 399: 301:
be here is a listing/account of teh various celebrations (not just hte cake-cutting on the ledge lawn). And is there an article for
112: 302: 234:
anniversary of the establishment of the third of the constituent components of the modern-day province of British Columbia.
297:, and the colonial and territorial articles. All the historical content here is superfluous except in simplest form; what 314: 310: 306: 103: 58: 33: 290: 336:
So what was the programme of events that formed BC150? All this article describes is what was being commemorated.
257: 352: 21: 193:; the history needs a trim, some correcting, and the focus of this article as it grows/survives should be 39: 111:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
360: 322: 273: 211: 155: 241: 294: 341: 253: 373: 356: 318: 269: 266: 207: 95: 237: 337: 85: 79: 52: 108: 221:
2008 is not the sesquicentennial of the province of British Columbia
15: 317:- and others, or is this the only such article in Knowledge? 154: 364: 345: 326: 277: 245: 215: 107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 256:was inconseuential; without its creation the 8: 19: 47: 395:Mid-importance British Columbia articles 303:Canadian cenntennial celebrations, 1967 49: 385:Mid-importance Canada-related articles 390:Start-Class British Columbia articles 191:the government programme/organization 7: 101:This article is within the scope of 380:Start-Class Canada-related articles 353:search on the BC Government website 38:It is of interest to the following 351:Particulars can be found via this 315:British Columbia Centennial (1966) 311:British Columbia Centennial (1958) 307:British Columbia Centennial (1871) 284:What is the point of this article? 14: 88: 78: 51: 20: 141:This article has been rated as 1: 163:This article is supported by 115:and see a list of open tasks. 400:All WikiProject Canada pages 166:WikiProject British Columbia 121:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada 291:History of British Columbia 124:Template:WikiProject Canada 416: 365:06:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 346:00:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 327:14:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 258:Colony of Vancouver Island 216:14:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 147:project's importance scale 162: 140: 73: 46: 295:British Columbia#History 278:02:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 246:00:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 127:Canada-related articles 159: 28:This article is rated 158: 160: 104:WikiProject Canada 34:content assessment 181: 180: 177: 176: 173: 172: 407: 129: 128: 125: 122: 119: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 64:British Columbia 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 415: 414: 410: 409: 408: 406: 405: 404: 370: 369: 334: 286: 254:Mainland Colony 223: 201:programme, not 186: 184:Brochure revamp 126: 123: 120: 117: 116: 94: 89: 87: 67: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 413: 411: 403: 402: 397: 392: 387: 382: 372: 371: 368: 367: 333: 330: 285: 282: 281: 280: 222: 219: 185: 182: 179: 178: 175: 174: 171: 170: 161: 151: 150: 143:Mid-importance 139: 133: 132: 130: 113:the discussion 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 68:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 412: 401: 398: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 377: 375: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 349: 348: 347: 343: 339: 331: 329: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 283: 279: 275: 271: 268: 264: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 220: 218: 217: 213: 209: 204: 200: 196: 192: 183: 168: 167: 157: 153: 152: 148: 144: 138: 135: 134: 131: 114: 110: 106: 105: 97: 96:Canada portal 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 335: 298: 287: 267:Nicola's War 262: 236: 232: 228: 224: 202: 198: 194: 190: 187: 164: 142: 102: 40:WikiProjects 30:Start-class 374:Categories 357:Skookum1 319:Skookum1 270:Skookum1 208:Skookum1 238:N921UBU 145:on the 332:To add 299:should 199:BC 150 118:Canada 109:Canada 59:Canada 36:scale. 338:RJFJR 263:to BC 195:about 361:talk 342:talk 323:talk 274:talk 242:talk 212:talk 197:the 203:why 137:Mid 376:: 363:) 344:) 325:) 313:, 309:, 305:, 293:, 276:) 244:) 214:) 62:: 359:( 355:. 340:( 321:( 272:( 240:( 210:( 169:. 149:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Canada
British Columbia
WikiProject icon
Canada portal
WikiProject Canada
Canada
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject British Columbia
Skookum1
talk
14:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
N921UBU
talk
00:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Mainland Colony
Colony of Vancouver Island
Nicola's War
Skookum1
talk
02:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
History of British Columbia
British Columbia#History
Canadian cenntennial celebrations, 1967

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑