181:
advert only ran in The
Hollywood Reporter. Brandt is even quoted as saying it costs the association $ 300 for the ad. He got the publicity he desired, including making front page news in at least one newspaper. There was talk of court action, specifically libel. It caused a significant stir, leading several of the stars mentioned to defend themselves. Someone could improve this article by adding quotes from Brandt and John Mannheimer to show their reasoning in more detail. From the Sydney Morning Herald article:
99:
81:
50:
21:
180:
I've spent some times tidying up the references in this article and doing more research into its contents. It appears that an earlier version of it conflated an editorial by Time
Magazine about this advert with the original advertisement itself. To be clear: Three contemporary sources state that the
185:
John
Mannheimer, the executive secretary of the Independent Theatre Owners' Association in New York, declared that the organisation was not attacking the stars personally. These stars, if given the right kind of vehicles, he said, would be the same stars as of old. He added: "Pictures are being
31:
186:
ground out regularly on the same old big scale, under the system of long-term contracts, with stars who eventually wil1 become obsolete, and we have to foot the bill."
156:
217:
139:
145:
222:
115:
212:
106:
86:
61:
27:
194:
67:
114:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
190:
198:
49:
20:
206:
38:(withdrawn by nominator and no comments in favour of deletion; non-admin close).
98:
80:
111:
43:
15:
110:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
144:This article has not yet received a rating on the
8:
75:
161:for tips on how to improve this article.
77:
47:
124:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Magazines
7:
218:Unknown-importance magazine articles
157:WikiProject Magazines' writing guide
104:This article is within the scope of
66:It is of interest to the following
14:
97:
79:
48:
19:
30:on 15 June 2013. The result of
26:This article was nominated for
223:WikiProject Magazines articles
127:Template:WikiProject Magazines
1:
118:and see a list of open tasks.
199:17:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
239:
146:project's importance scale
213:C-Class magazine articles
152:
143:
92:
74:
191:WikiMane11 (ThunderPeel)
188:
56:This article is rated
183:
107:WikiProject Magazines
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
62:content assessment
173:
172:
169:
168:
165:
164:
130:magazine articles
42:
41:
230:
132:
131:
128:
125:
122:
101:
94:
93:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
238:
237:
233:
232:
231:
229:
228:
227:
203:
202:
178:
176:Jan 2022 Update
129:
126:
123:
120:
119:
57:
12:
11:
5:
236:
234:
226:
225:
220:
215:
205:
204:
177:
174:
171:
170:
167:
166:
163:
162:
150:
149:
142:
136:
135:
133:
116:the discussion
102:
90:
89:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
235:
224:
221:
219:
216:
214:
211:
210:
208:
201:
200:
196:
192:
187:
182:
175:
160:
159:
158:
151:
147:
141:
138:
137:
134:
117:
113:
109:
108:
103:
100:
96:
95:
91:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
189:
184:
179:
155:
154:
105:
68:WikiProjects
35:
36:speedy keep
207:Categories
121:Magazines
112:magazines
87:Magazines
28:deletion
58:C-class
64:scale.
195:talk
153:See
34:was
140:???
209::
197:)
193:(
148:.
70::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
