Talk:Bookends (album) - Knowledge (XXG)

2132:, because these are an object possessed by a significant proportion of the world's population, and used on a daily basis by the vast majority of the world's secondary and tertiary students and many if not most of those with tertiary qualifications. The proportion of primary students I wouldn't like to guess (I once trained for work in Central African Republic, where I would likely have owned the only bookends for miles if even I had owned any, but didn't actually get there... long story) but in the developed world bookends are ubiquitous in primary schools too. A great many people possess them, even more use them, and if they speak English they know what we mean by the term. 1751:" Moreover, bookends are commonly sold and used in pairs, so the usage in the plural may be more common in this case than for some other topics (although probably not enough to support the plural as the primary form relative to the singular). Generally, I think that if a typical person sees an article title and thinks, based on the title, that they are reasonably sure of what the article should be about, that is what it should be about. — 21: 642:'Song analysis' section: I know you have split this into three paragraphs to make this section more readable, but given that the first half of the album is meant to be a collection of songs on the same theme, I wonder if it would be better to split this section into two longer paragraphs instead, based on side one and side two of the record, and not split the paragraphs halfway through side one's "concept" album. 191: 240: 222: 122: 899:"unhelpful"? Whether it is a question of preempting the predictable objection to "who will fix links" now, or whether it will come to use in two or five years when inevitably as happens with all albums and songs the next album "Bookends" is issued, a clear pipelink in a template is nothing but helpful. Instead of which you've just gone through articles removing pipelinks to ensure work. 1698:

plural. (Choose some random nouns and try it for yourself.) So if we consider that as a baseline, when we see views for a particular plural that jump way up, relatively speaking, I think it's a reasonable assumption that at least a large portion of the jump is because people are looking for that plural topic separately from the common noun. So here, where the plural gets almost 9x

2781:

whether to follow a link, they add words to the sentence or pipe the link where the article title is imprecise. (Why don't self-style titling experts understand this?) The Knowledge (XXG) search box autocomplete is doing poorly where articles do not have recognizable titles. Bookends is a terrible title for this article in terms of the search box autosuggest functionality,

1269:. Now someone searching for bookends has a convenient redirect to get where they want to go, while the 90% of people who want this album when they type "bookends" get where they want to go as well. That, combined with the hatnote here should be satisfactory for everyone involved. This is what we aim to do - get our readers where they want to go, correct? 487: 2942: 2993: 2748:

top with summary information clealy identifying that it is the album by Simon & Garfunkel? I suspect few entered "en.wikipedia.org/Bookends" into the url. Next to nobody types titles, they arrive with assistance. I think the 2.548-16 reflects the fact the search engines and wikilinks assist in identifying the page. --

1351:). Also refer to this quote from PLURALPT, "Because readers and editors are used to seeing titles at the singular form, and can be expected to search for them/link to them in the singular form, the intentional use of a plural form by a reader or editor can be evidence that a separate primary topic exists at the plural form." 645:'Critical reception' section: obviously it would be great if this were longer, but I understand it's not easy to get hold of reviews, particularly from the original release in 1968. I am British and in a month or so I should be able to visit the British Library and try and track down reviews from UK music magazines ( 1435:

album and then following the album hatnote to real bookends, but there will be users who simply re-enter cutting off "s". It still doesn't address the problem that there is no way a user "bookends" with a small "b" can get real bookends instead of an album from the 1960s. Even though bookends come in pairs.

2274:

Page views and link clicks are biased to the economically privileged. Bookends over a popular album reflects a structure of generic at base names, specific topics more precisely titled. An encylopedia is more like a library than KMart. In a library, things are stored in their logical place, little

1197:

I'm asking how users can search for real bookends without getting this album. The relevance is that currently if I search for "bookends" (small b) I don't get bookends (small b), small b sends me to an album by Simon and Garfunkel. So how do I search for bookends (small b) and get bookends (small b)?

2444:

My reply is that, having spent several decades in computer support (software mainly but some PC hardware), when I'm called to a busted computer to this day and always in the past the first two things out of the toolbox are always a notebook (the paper sort) and pen. And the number of times I've said

1910:

I'm not sure we want to add that information on just that one ref, but it sounds quite fascinating to me, probably true and exactly the sort of material that should be added to the article when properly sourced. That patent should be verifiable, not easily perhaps but someone will eventually take it

1664:

looking for. Between existing non-disambiguation page topics, pageviews are of limited utility. We have no idea whether the reader who ended up here typed "bookends" or "Bookends", or even whether they were thinking of the device when they typed "Bookends" with a capitol "B". Maybe they got this far

578:

Would be good to see this album achieve GA status, it's an important and best-selling record across English-speaking territories. I've taken the liberty of first tidying up the punctuation in the article: many of the apostrophes and quotation marks were in varying fonts, and punctuation like periods

2747:

Of your 2,548 page views, what proportion do you think came from wikilinking, where the link almost always has context, and what proportion from google, where "bookends" gives absolutely no hint that google thinks searchers want the album, but add further information and the album article hits the

2622:

move, as well as the redirect of Bookends to Bookend. I agree with the position advanced above by several editors that the primary topic of "Bookends" is, well, bookends. That they generally come in pairs, increasing the frequency with which they'd be referred to by the plural, only strengthens the

2602:

Reject the the Simon & Garfunkel album as primary topic because it is a commercial product named to capitalise on an existing and familiar term, and because Knowledge (XXG) should resist promulgation of promotional tricks. Also not that notwithstanding the significance of Simon & Garfunkel

2524:

I guess the answer is that we don't know. Even if books are around for a long time, bookends may not be; and even if they are, they're just not that important historically. They're like doorstops for bookshelves. I concede, however, that there's a long run over which bookends are likely to be more

2240:

It made me sad to see that Knowledge (XXG) was being dumbed down to suit inadequate searching for commercial products by socially economically privileged readers. Minimising clicks is about serving those that click the most, and it was at the expense of logical structure. I am heartened to see the

2152:

I wasn't aware that "number of items sold/in existence" was relevant in terms of current policy and guidelines, either.... If you really don't think that most of our current "bookends"-seeking readers are looking for this article, in spite of contrary evidence, then I guess there's nothing else to

1520:

That only deals with the title of the objects, not the usage of the plural. How is this musical subject primary over the objects? That also must be satisfied, or the object would be primary, since it is only by Knowledge (XXG) convention that objects use singular and not plural. It could easily be

1434:

As for the page stats, of course pop albums get more page views, even when we conceal that they are albums and do not provide artist names, so lack of dab traffic suggests we are not at the worst case of 7k coming here, 6k staying here, and 1k finding it is not about bookends but about a 1960s pop

3061:

This is apocryphal. Basically it's nonsense. And as for side 2 'largely' consisting of unused material: Simon had only three songs for Nichols, only one (Mrs Robinson) was used, one unused is 'Overs' which is on side ONE, so this is more rubbish. It'd sure be nice if WP writers could occasionally

2063:

I'm sorry - I thought that by including size in my latest response as one the of the stats by which one can compare the two articles to determine which is the primarytopic for "bookends", I was addressing your question. It's not a simple byte-to-byte comparison, but when one article (this one) is

1996:

will want to find." I can understand (although I disagree with) the position that bookend the object is somehow more important or of greater long-term significance than the album, and thus should be the primarytopic even for the plural form, but that's not what you are saying. You are saying that

1608:

issues has been to weigh the importance of each of the topics involved. If, hypothetically, all of our common noun articles were at the plural title, what would be the primary topic between the common noun topic and the popular culture topic. In most cases I think that the answer is obviously the

1697:

I buy all of that, and certainly the general concept. I do think that we can get some rough idea, though, by looking at general trends in plural usage. I've mentioned this elsewhere, but if you look across subjects, the singular version of a word tends to get 10x or even 20x the pageviews of the

2780:

Indeed it does. External search engines and wikitext links are doing well, despite the generally too-short, imprecise titling. External search engines would be doing well because they read the whole page. Wikitext does well because editors understand that readers need context before deciding

1802:. Historically, parachutes are much more important than bookends; although I would not deign to compare the importance of the Coldplay Album with the Simon and Garfunkel album, we know that the latter album has the benefit of still being the subject of critical acclaim nearly five decades on. 2068:

lengthier than the other, I think it says something about the relative importance that WP editors at least, have assigned it, and stands as a good proxy for what our readers, too, will be interested in. But let's put that aside for now, please. Let's assume that size has zero to do with this

839:. "Because readers and editors are used to seeing titles at the singular form, and can be expected to search for them/link to them in the singular form, the intentional use of a plural form by a reader or editor can be evidence that a separate primary topic exists at the plural form." 1166:, I mean how does someone who is looking for real "bookends" type "bookends" in the top right hand search box and get real bookends? How do they type "bookends" and avoid getting an album instead? Our search doesn't distinguish initial b/B, our titles don't distinguish initial b/B. 339:

Fakin It. Half-way through the song, there is a background sound of a door opening, and the English tune "Clogger's Horpipe" played on a concertina. A voice says "Good morning Mr Leitch. Had a busy day?". This is sometimes taken to be a reference to Donovan (Donovan Leitch).

1324:

or similar unlikely redirects, how does a reader get from searching for real bookends to get to an article about real bookends? Remember the rh search box cannot distinguish between initial b and initial capital B. So how does a reader search for bookends and get bookends?

2704:. That strongly suggests that people are expecting to find the album when they type in "bookends", and that the proposed move will make life more difficult for our readers. I would hope that some of the !opposers above will see this and reconsider their !votes. 2255:

SmokeyJoe, I don't understand. Someone who buys an album is economically privileged, whereas someone who buys a bookend is not? Most bookends are commercially produced and sold products, yes? And those who click the most (or at least most of those who click) -

2670:

For the past week, there has been a special redirect in place at this article to track the number of people who come here looking for the object instead of the album. It's not an exact science. But the results are pretty striking. Over the past eight days:

2481:

I think a bookend is a bit more like the typewriter carriage return lever than it is like assembler language, or even like "pen and paper". Some libraries are full of books but bereft of bookends because they have other means of arranging their shelves.

1392:, why should we do it for something else that comes in pairs (i.e. I don't think you can even buy a single "one bookend" on Amazon.com). So how does a user search for "bookends" with a small "b" and get real bookends instead of an album from the 1960s? 3056:

Bookends is a concept album that explores a life journey from childhood to old age. Side one of the album marks successive stages in life, the theme serving as bookends to the life cycle. Side two largely consists of unused material for The Graduate

2135:

The album, on the other hand, sold two million copies. That's a lot, but there are even more bookends. Many times. And those who don't know that bookends exist have largely never heard of the 1968 Simon and Garfunkel album either, in my estimation.

579:(full stops) and commas were incorrectly placed before the closing quotation marks. I left the wording alone for the most part (save obvious errors), but there are some words that to me don't seem right in the context of an encyclopedia article. 2226:. But no worries. If you (not just you - the larger "you") want to make it more difficult for our readers to get to the page they're looking for, it makes me sad, but that seems to be the direction we're going around RM and AT. C'est la vie.... 1907:

Additional Facts and Other Interesting Details: In the past, the bookends were made from very heavy materials. Lighter versions only emerged sometime in the 1870s, a time when the simple sheet metal was originally patented for this specific

1637:

Thanks for the openness and clarity in sharing your thought process on these moves. Would we all do the same! One question, though - what about the usage criterion? It is the other major criterion we are supposed consider in determining

2352:, but too lazy to bother with the artist or genre, should still expect it find it easily in a popular shop, or google, but should not expect to find it has the first entry in the contents page of a reference work of all information. -- 1928:- I'm still a little stumped. Certainly, the bookend article is capable of some expansion, and perhaps "unlikely to grow" should have been more like "unlikely to grow substantially" or "unlikely to grow into an article of the size of 1368:, I'm sorry to press you but how does this answer my simple question. How do I search for "bookends" with a small "b" and get bookends instead of an album from the 1960s. Search cannot distinguish between initial "b" and "B". 928:

It is near to inevitable that there will be other media products with a generic name. It happens to all our song album book film articles eventually. In this case it has already happened in fact, there is already another

1410:

article, the traffic stats would reflect that. Instead, in the last month, we have 7k coming here, 1k at bookend, and almost nobody at the disambig page. it seems they are using the singular and finding it just fine.

2189:

Actually, strike that. We can't find consensus until we start from the same foundation. So - do you agree or disagree that most of our current "bookends"-seeking readers are looking for this article? Let's start there.

1733:, the number of English-speaking people on the planet who think of "Bookends" primarily as an album is certainly much smaller than the number who think of "Bookends" as things used to hold books upright on shelves. Per 624:'Background', last line: "The duo offered another new song, then titled "Mrs. Roosevelt", that was not as developed..." – I think it should be stated here that this was the song that later turned into "Mrs. Robinson". 2644:

says "plurals are treated like any other topic", and if it didn't we ought to ignore it. The primary encyclopedic topic seems to be the object. Also, there are lot of other meanings for "Bookends" (several listed at

2420:

I'm just going to interject here that I think there's a degree to which bookends are like typewriter carriage return levers. How much longer will people even have books as anything other than a historic curiosity?

308:

I don't think we need it at all. That's what wiktionary is for. I guess if there's cultural or social or scientific or historical scrutiny of bookends, then... (I'm probably being a cultural philistine. Good.)

2111:

I think it says something about the relative importance that WP editors at least, have assigned it, and stands as a good proxy for what our readers, too, will be interested in. But let's put that aside for now,

433:

At the very end of the album (after the Zoo)there is a very faint backwards message - I suspect it is one of their other songs being played backwards. Does anyone know what it is or know the story behind this?

3095: 633:'Recording and production', second paragraph: "the harmonies the band were known for slowly exited" – doesn't sound right to me, I think "gradually disappeared" or something along those lines would be better. 2019:

etc is that you're mixing up relevant issues with ones that are irrelevant (particularly but not only article size, see my first question which you have not addressed at all). It makes the discussion rather

913:

It wasn't "fixing", and it's not "inevitable". It was premature if this RM is successful, and unnecessary if it fails. It's best practice to link to an actual article instead of a redirect most of the time.

1660:, and there is an asserted primary topic for that title, because readers are probably not looking for a disambiguation page at all. Pageviews of topics listed on the page suggest which topic the reader was 2069:

question. Can you look at the other criteria I mentioned - pageviews, number and quality of refs, incoming links, and explain how exactly you think reader experience will be improved by this RM? Thanks.

636:'Recording and production', third paragraph: "John Simon's work with the duo begat several tracks..." – don't think I've seen the word "begat" used outside of the Bible! "Produced" would be simpler. 1831:

will want to find. Reader experience trumps all other considerations. Some of our guidelines seem to need fixing, and the first step in this is to get a rough consensus supporting this move. And

2785:

would make the autosuggest meaningful. Looking at the autosuggest in action in the image to the right, does it not look likely that a reader will expect "Bookends" to be the ordinary thing? --

731:

My fault entirely Dom – I never intended to open the review in the first place, I just wanted to comment on it, and I didn't have the time to carry out the review. My apologies to all involved.

2456:, predicted since the late 1960s, commercial fusion within ten years, predicted since the early 1970s, and computers rivalling the human brain in power, predicted within ten years in the 1980s. 1966:

claim was IMO quite simply contrary to all evidence. I'll answer more fully when I deal with some local emergencies I hope, but meantime perhaps you might indicate for me why you think the

1083:

I realize that two wrongs don't make a right, but try searching "richhoncho" and "knee jerk" or "knee-jerk" - I was just using their own terminology. If you find it offensive, I apologize.

1665:

and assumed Knowledge (XXG) has no article on the device, and gave up. We also really have no idea whether they came here from a link in another page, like the one I made when I created "

630:'Recording and production', second paragraph: "allowed Simon to show off his chops..." – same thing regarding idiomatic expressions... how about "allowed Simon to display his talents..."? 627:'Recording and production', first paragraph: "on Columbia's dime" – I don't think idiomatic expressions like this should be used in the article, I would prefer "at Columbia's expense". 639:'Recording and production', third paragraph: "Her reportings were printed..." – "reportings" isn't a word you would use here, maybe "Her observations were reported" would work better. 2449:

write it down exactly as it appears on the screen" is large and still growing. It's not easy to search the logs of a dead box, and a lot more trouble than just using pen and paper.

2803:. If you think that making "Bookends" a redirect to "Bookend" will improve that number, I have a counter-example I could show you. It's hard to improve on 0.6%, don't you think? 1768:

I note the similar pair (ho ho), nomination, Parachute/Parachutes has been resolved with a straight mathematic !vote of 8 to 2 (with one neutral) and the album has been moved to

1677:

at the time, I would have pointed the link there, and everyone who decided to go from the song to the album would have boosted the pagecount of the latter title, not the former.

847:

for a reason - a reader or editor who types in "bookends" is much more likely to intend this well-known album by a well-known artist. No need to misdirect readers unnecessarily.

1609:

common noun topic. Here, I am not so sure, only because the book-supporting device is relatively insignificant in the scope of human history. It could almost be merged into

1431:

Perhaps, but that wasn't the question I asked. I asked "So how does a user search for "bookends" with a small "b" and get real bookends instead of an album from the 1960s?"

349:

Re: Donovan, this was almost definitely a reference to him as the line in the song is (according to Patrick Humphreys - biographer) spoken by an ex-girldfriend of Donovan.

130: 525: 595:

s release, but I don't think you can use "penultimate" here without some sort of reference to that. I would just remove "the penultimate" from this sentence altogether.

492: 1988:

I'm stumped how anyone can look at the two articles, see the stats behind them (size, pageviews, number and quality of refs, incoming links, etc.) and then say that

515: 2032: 612:

Third paragraph of lead section: "The album has continued to see critical acclaim..." – I prefer "receive critical acclaim", I'm not sure acclaim is ever "seen".

2722: 615:'Background', first paragraph: "during a period in which the duo had broken apart..." – "broken up" or "split" is more usual in the context of musical groups. 1881:

Thanks for the comment but I'm afraid that while I agree strongly with some of the points you make and while they sound good they don't seem to apply to the

2085:

including size in my latest response as one the of the stats by which one can compare the two articles to determine which is the primarytopic for "bookends"

1449:

I don't know how you can say there is no way for them to get there and then in the same comment discuss the disambiguation page they use to get there.

2167:

I don't want to give up on consensus yet. You do realise that record sales are one of the key pieces of evidence accepted as evidence of notability?

2121:. The first is controversial, and the other three irrelevant in terms of current policy and guidelines, as far as I can see. Have I missed something? 147: 2844:- This doesn't change anything, there is overwhelming consensus above to include (album), for all the reasons stated by each supporter of the move. 3020:

The Wiki page on Paul Simon gives his birth date as Oct 13, 1941. This is in conflict with the Background section that states he was 27 in 1966.

1613:. The album, by contrast, is particularly important - although I may be biased in thinking that, since I wrote the article (many years ago) on " 2762:

Doesn't that suggest that search engines and wikilinks do a fantastic job in identifying this page, then, if only 0.6% clicked away from it to

1864:

will want to find." Isn't reader experience made better by sending people to a better article that they're trying to reach in the first place?

1406:

There's no evidence that anyone's actually doing that. If they were coming here first, then having to use the disamig page, then going to the

497: 50: 2782: 2739: 2726: 2583: 896: 862: 3105: 1287:? That's exactly the same without the need for a redirect. This is my last comment on this RM (for the benefit of other editors and me). -- 441: 256: 1889:

already given in the article, one of only two there so I'd have looked at them both at least before making any claim that the article is

766:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

2043:

is the only part of it answered by page stats, and that's one of the critical limitations of such stats, and why we also have regard to

3085: 1522: 997: 2725:

Entering the search query "bookends" doesn't really help find the album because the album has an imprecise title. If it were titled

1860:

article is well-written, well-referenced, and gets thousands of views a month. This article is in fact "what most people looking for

520: 38: 2128:. I think that most readers would expect the physical object(s), not the record album, to be the topic of the article they found at 564: 350: 3100: 3067: 461: 330:

Should this be in List of Concept Albums? Maybe I'm overanalyzing, but I thought I heard a repeated theme of aging and old age.--

320: 32: 398: 251:, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the 2441:

Good question. Many of my primary school students ask their teachers "why do we need to learn to write? I just use my tablet."

1940:. I would be interested to know which metric(s) lead you to state that most people looking for "bookends" are looking for the 602:

were immense..." – can you use "immense" referring to sales figures, rather than physical size? Would "substantial" be better?

252: 247: 227: 202: 1373: 456:

Yes. The message says 'please listen to an original vinyl Sgt Pepper 1st printing and bring along a Klingon to translate'.

3090: 3040: 2979: 2742:. Then, these people coming to this page won't have to use expectations, they will know what page they are downloading. 757: 3063: 2907: 1321: 865:. I reverted those moves as premature and unhelpful. In the course of doing so, though, I noticed that there was only 784: 457: 316: 1794:

has ever meant disregarding the relative importance of the topics in making primary topic determinations. Otherwise,

1970:

of the article is even remotely relevant to this discussion, and exactly what is puzzling you to the point of being

1029:. 70 makes the most telling point, "the world involves more than music" Why aren't these technical requests now? -- 3062:

curb their immature enthusiasm and, for now, it'd be satisfactory if someone could correct the above. Thank you.

2721: 2031:(which is the closest I can get in English to tenseless, it's not a speculation of the future which would violate 2817:

I think it is more important for Knowledge (XXG) users to know what page they are downloading from its title. --

2275:

consideration as to whether it is banal, specialist or popular. In KMart, the most popular stuff is at the door.

1010:

The world, however, does include music. And if a musical topic is most significant, why discriminate against it?

802: 105: 86: 2223: 2205: 2045: 1639: 539: 2646: 2641: 2603:

in their field, a massive proportion of the readership is unfamiliar with them, but familiar with bookends. --

2873: 1791: 1773: 767: 618:'Background', first paragraph: "brought upon new critical and commercial success..." – remove the word "upon". 445: 208: 3036: 3025: 2970: 2899: 2849: 1852:: the problem is, "what people think of when you say a word" is not the same as "what they use WP for". The 1440: 1397: 1330: 1231: 1203: 1171: 1140: 1074: 970: 938: 904: 810: 2452:

Let me tell you a few other things I've noticed that were predicted to be about to happen: No more need of

437: 354: 1905:... BTW this article should be marked as a stub, IMO). Either way, what do you think of the section there 1666: 1614: 1526: 1001: 780: 397:

How can this be described as a concept album when half of it is a film soundtrack without thematic unity?

1902: 621:'Background', second paragraph: "Artists in the time period..." – better to say "artists at the time...". 3005: 2954:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2628: 1756: 1317: 736: 684: 558: 140: 20: 2898:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2184: 1734: 1730: 1605: 1489: 1385: 1381: 1177: 844: 836: 2932: 1781: 1571: 1356: 1292: 1185: 1154: 1117: 1034: 331: 42: 2822: 2790: 2753: 2608: 2460: 2357: 2246: 121: 2686: 1180:

is not about letter casing, so I'm not sure why you are asking me about it. What's the relevance?

3021: 2845: 2808: 2771: 2709: 2654: 2453: 2265: 2231: 2195: 2158: 2074: 2006: 1949: 1885:

article on even a little investigation. If you haven't already, have a look at the external link

1869: 1769: 1711: 1647: 1543: 1508: 1457: 1436: 1419: 1393: 1326: 1274: 1227: 1217: 1199: 1167: 1136: 1088: 1070: 1048: 1015: 966: 952: 934: 919: 900: 878: 852: 806: 383: 1832: 2955: 3035:

interesting, think i was just writing from a book source on that one. i'll update it. thanks.

2515: 2472: 2213: 2172: 2141: 2054: 1979: 1916: 1840: 1262: 543: 420: 3001: 2891: 2624: 2579: 2535: 2492: 2431: 2222:

Despite your unsure-ness, it's very clear that this album dwarfs the plural of "bookend" in

1812: 1752: 1687: 1627: 1284: 824: 798: 732: 718: 696: 680: 671: 554: 159: 2962: 1777: 1567: 1365: 1352: 1313: 1288: 1194: 1181: 1163: 1150: 1132: 1113: 1030: 665: 373: 2863: 1135:, fine but how does someone type a small "b" when looking for "bookends" not "Bookends"? 1066: 368:

How could this song be recorded in October of 1968 when the album was released in April?

3000:

Checked, although I'm not sure how much use an archive version of the duo's website is.

2181:

I don't think anyone is disputing the WP:Notability of either this album or the object.

1706:, doesn't that seem to put this in the slam-dunk category for usage? Am I making sense? 1617:". In sum, I find this to be an edge case, and can neither support nor oppose the move. 2818: 2786: 2749: 2604: 2353: 2242: 700: 406: 294:

Re: Lennon's "Walrus"; Lennon sings "Goo Goo Ga Joob" rather than "Coo Coo Ca Choo"...

2961:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3079: 2804: 2767: 2705: 2261: 2227: 2191: 2154: 2070: 2002: 1945: 1878: 1865: 1707: 1643: 1592: 1536: 1501: 1450: 1412: 1389: 1369: 1340: 1270: 1213: 1109: 1084: 1044: 1011: 948: 915: 874: 873:. Making this change would clearly be a negative move for editors and readers alike. 848: 379: 2204:

I'd have to say that I'm unsure. But I'd also say that it's irrelevant, because the

801:– the primary topic of bookends is bookends which naturally come in pairs. See also 2908:

https://web.archive.org/web/20141108015332/http://www.simonandgarfunkel.com/us/home

2511: 2468: 2209: 2168: 2137: 2050: 1975: 1925: 1912: 1849: 1836: 653: 609:

soundtrack..." – I'm not really sure what you mean by "premiering" in this context.

417: 310: 583:

First paragraph of lead section: "Released several weeks prior to the penultimate

2102:(my added emphasis). It seems to me that you were actively ignoring the question. 3029: 2526: 2483: 2422: 1886: 1803: 1678: 1618: 996:

the world involves more than just music. This clearly isn't the usual usage. --

710: 1739:

the normal situation is that a plural redirects to its singular. For instance,

2872:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

2464: 659: 369: 239: 221: 164:

began appearing spray-painted on vacant buildings and abandoned factories in

2260:. That's exactly who'll be getting the shaft here. At the expense of logic. 1535:

The object is the primary topic for the singular, the album for the plural.

1492:. Objects are titled with the singular, including ones that come in pairs: 134: 2911: 2001:. I'm just curious what evidence or argument leads you to that conclusion. 1043:

Do you even consider the arguments before adding your knee-jerk !supports?

546:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 3071: 3044: 3009: 2984: 2853: 2826: 2812: 2794: 2775: 2757: 2713: 2676: 2659: 2640:

I'm not sure what the policy/guideline grounds for opposing this move are…

2632: 2612: 2540: 2519: 2497: 2476: 2436: 2361: 2269: 2250: 2235: 2217: 2199: 2176: 2162: 2145: 2078: 2058: 2010: 1983: 1953: 1920: 1873: 1844: 1817: 1785: 1760: 1715: 1692: 1651: 1632: 1596: 1575: 1550: 1530: 1515: 1464: 1444: 1426: 1401: 1360: 1334: 1296: 1278: 1235: 1221: 1207: 1189: 1158: 1144: 1121: 1092: 1078: 1052: 1038: 1019: 1005: 974: 956: 942: 923: 908: 882: 856: 827: 814: 788: 740: 726: 688: 568: 465: 449: 422: 410: 387: 358: 344: 334: 324: 2735: 2592: 2575: 1937: 1929: 1857: 1610: 1588: 1384:

ING that I cannot search for "bookends" and get bookends. We don't under

1348: 840: 794: 341: 302: 2763: 2701: 2693: 2682: 2650: 2596: 1998: 1989: 1941: 1933: 1853: 1795: 1584: 1563: 1407: 1344: 1266: 962: 870: 298: 165: 2949:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

1856:

article is barely more than a dictdef stub, and unlikely to grow. The

1799: 591:

was Simon & Garfunkel's penultimate album before splitting after

2599:, as these devices come in pairs. At least the interesting ones do. 947:

And if that album rivils this one for primarytopic, we can revisit.

2692:

That's 0.6% of people who came to this article and clicked away to

2208:

of the physical object so clearly dwarfs that of the record album.

2126:

how exactly you think reader experience will be improved by this RM

2720: 1746: 1377: 2039:. We're talking about significantly different propositions. The 1497: 1493: 297:

Just being pedantic -- Shouldn't the second definition be under

1261:. I think I may just have solved this problem. I just created 647: 184: 709:. Please address these issues before re-nominating. Thanks!-- 3096:

Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are good articles

2917:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

587:

in 1968..." – I imagine what you are trying to say is that

156:

Did you know ... that in 2010, a song lyric from the album

2902:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2049:

of course. And that is very much part of what I'm saying.

1901:

but which as you express it applies equally to many other

255:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 2027:

in my original vote was a gut reaction, please note the

1521:

Knowledge (XXG) convention to use plural for objects. --

2799:

And yet only 16 clicked away over the course of a week,

2467:

still sells lots of books. It may not last. But it may.

2183:

The relevant question is how does record sales fit into

2895: 2653:, perhaps this should point to a disambiguation page? — 1741: 657:, etc.) if that helps, as well as more modern reviews ( 605:

Third paragraph of lead section: "premiering alongside

98: 1827:. The physical object is what most people looking for 1776:

means anything, then this move should be supported. --

378:

Hey--wait a minute--that's why I logged on this page!!

2862:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2119:

pageviews, number and quality of refs, incoming links

2729:, this title would helpfully appear as a suggestion. 2510:(my emphasis), have I done so to your satisfaction? 2117:

So now I'd like to ask about your other criteria...

1704:

80x more than what we would expect the plural to get

598:

Third paragraph of lead section: "Initial sales for

1642:. What role does usage play in your thinking here? 770:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2876:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2502:First things first. I was answering your question 2107:assume that size has zero to do with this question 1997:more people looking for "bookends" want to go to 861:Note: the nom had changed most incoming links to 2696:. That's 99.4% who came to this article and did 2445:to someone "the next time you get that message, 2109:, noting that that you also want the last word: 1932:." But I encourage you to make a comparison of 1745:is a redirect page, taking readers directly to 1658:if the base page title is a disambiguation page 2463:of print material on university campuses, and 2459:There's an enormous and ongoing investment in 48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1887:http://www.dimensionsinfo.com/bookends-sizes/ 8: 2508:as anything other than a historic curiosity? 1566:. The plural is the clear primary topic. -- 1374:Amazon.com "bookends" actually gets bookends 2890:I have just modified one external link on 1656:I consider pageviews to be very important 756:The following is a closed discussion of a 475: 216: 62: 15: 1911:on. I could go on, but you get the idea. 2912:http://www.simonandgarfunkel.com/us/home 2033:WP:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball 1388:redirect users searching for "shoes" to 779:: majority for "move", has run 40 days. 2734:If helping readers is the desire, move 1316:assuming I don't search for Dohn joe's 1226:But not answered below, I will re-ask. 506: 478: 218: 2783:Bookends (Simon & Garfunkel album) 2740:Bookends (Simon & Garfunkel album) 2727:Bookends (Simon & Garfunkel album) 2584:Bookends (Simon & Garfunkel album) 2504:How much longer will people even have 2017:anyone can look at the two articles... 1738: 1372:hasn't addressed this either. Compare 897:Bookends (Simon & Garfunkel album) 863:Bookends (Simon & Garfunkel album) 2929:to let others know (documentation at 2096:you think the size of the article is 961:No need, this RM is simply proposing 7: 775:The result of the move request was: 245:This article is within the scope of 190: 188: 2105:But I will accept the offer to now 207:It is of interest to the following 2681:clicks on the special redirect to 965:as the natural topic of bookends. 823:, per the nominator's rationale. 265:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Albums 14: 2894:. Please take a moment to review 1992:is "what most people looking for 1604:: my thinking in examining these 1343:'s post. The object is singular ( 1312:- this is almost becoming comic. 895:In what way is fixing a pipelink 41:. If you can improve it further, 2991: 2940: 2015:OK, understood. The reason that 1322:Bookends (pair of wooden things) 1149:I don't follow. Please clarify. 238: 220: 189: 120: 19: 2801:regardless of how they got here 1895:barely more than a dictdef stub 1702:than the singular, or possibly 2613:05:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 2541:03:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 2520:18:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2498:13:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2477:04:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2437:01:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2362:01:43, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 2348:Someone looking for the album 2270:13:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 2251:12:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 2236:12:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 2218:04:44, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 2200:20:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2177:18:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2163:13:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2146:01:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2079:20:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 2059:19:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 2011:19:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1984:18:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1954:18:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1921:17:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1874:15:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1845:11:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1818:19:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1786:08:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1761:20:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1716:19:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1693:19:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1652:18:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1633:18:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1597:09:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1576:13:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1551:19:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1531:08:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1516:02:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1465:17:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1445:04:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1427:02:46, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1402:00:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1361:05:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1335:02:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 1297:19:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1279:16:44, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1236:00:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 1222:16:44, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1208:14:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1190:12:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1159:07:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1145:07:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1122:02:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1093:01:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1079:23:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 1053:18:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 1039:18:20, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 1020:18:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 1006:05:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 975:07:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 957:01:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 943:23:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 924:22:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 909:22:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 883:17:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 857:16:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 828:13:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 815:11:36, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 133:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 3086:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 705:No progress made in a month. 450:02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 3072:04:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3010:02:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC) 2985:23:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC) 2854:01:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC) 2827:02:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC) 2813:15:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 2795:03:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 2776:02:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 2758:01:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC) 2714:17:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC) 2660:18:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC) 2633:16:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 1347:) and this album is plural ( 1283:OK, so why are you opposing 789:09:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 466:04:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 345:10:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 325:04:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC) 3106:WikiProject Albums articles 1897:(a claim only saved by the 843:is listed as an example at 593:Bridge Over Troubled Water' 268:Template:WikiProject Albums 154:The text of the entry was: 3122: 2887:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2258:want to go to this article 2035:) and contrast it to your 574:Comments from Richard3120: 388:09:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC) 335:16:02, 2 August 2005 (UTC) 3045:06:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 3030:23:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 2525:important than an album. 803:Bookends (disambiguation) 233: 215: 175: 65: 61: 2869:Please do not modify it. 2647:bookend (disambiguation) 1562:per nom and redirect to 1376:. Since "bookends" like 1065:How is this comment not 763:Please do not modify it. 741:09:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 727:00:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 423:08:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 411:00:45, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 359:12:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 3101:GA-Class Album articles 2883:External links modified 1833:then fix the guidelines 689:05:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC) 569:05:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC) 3064:Brett Alexander Hunter 2730: 2206:long-term significance 2098:even remotely relevant 2046:long-term significance 1667:A Hazy Shade of Winter 1615:A Hazy Shade of Winter 675:) of the 2001 reissue. 458:Brett Alexander Hunter 364:"Overs" Recording Date 317:Brett Alexander Hunter 197:This article is rated 131:fact from this article 2724: 2675:visits to this page: 2124:Now to your question 2083:I cannot see how, by 1380:come in pairs, it is 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 39:good article criteria 3051:Curb Your Enthusiasm 805:for other meanings. 106:Good article nominee 87:Good article nominee 3091:Music good articles 3015: 2921:parameter below to 2461:automated retrieval 1790:I don't think that 33:Music good articles 3037:Saginaw-hitchhiker 2973:InternetArchiveBot 2731: 2454:assembler language 2100:to this discussion 1770:Parachutes (album) 1318:Bookends (objects) 248:WikiProject Albums 203:content assessment 66:Article milestones 1549: 1514: 1463: 1425: 1263:Bookends (object) 869:mistaken link to 781:Anthony Appleyard 544:Talk:Bookends/GA1 534: 533: 440:comment added by 287: 286: 283: 282: 279: 278: 183: 182: 115: 114: 57: 3113: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2983: 2974: 2947: 2944: 2943: 2936: 2892:Bookends (album) 2871: 2666:Stat to consider 2580:Bookends (album) 2533: 2490: 2429: 2091:the question of 1964:unlikely to grow 1891:unlikely to grow 1810: 1744: 1685: 1675:Bookends (album) 1673:had been titled 1640:WP:PRIMARYTOPICs 1625: 1583:and redirect to 1546: 1541: 1539: 1511: 1506: 1504: 1460: 1455: 1453: 1422: 1417: 1415: 1285:Bookends (album) 799:Bookends (album) 765: 723: 715: 704: 488:Copyvio detector 476: 452: 403: 393:"Concept album"? 273: 272: 269: 266: 263: 242: 235: 234: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 192: 185: 176:Current status: 124: 101: 63: 46: 27:Bookends (album) 23: 16: 3121: 3120: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3076: 3075: 3053: 3018: 2992: 2990: 2977: 2972: 2945: 2941: 2930: 2900:this simple FaQ 2885: 2880: 2867: 2668: 2527: 2484: 2423: 2241:tide turned. -- 1962:about it, your 1804: 1798:would point to 1740: 1679: 1619: 1544: 1537: 1509: 1502: 1458: 1451: 1420: 1413: 1366:User:Melonkelon 1314:User:Melonkelon 1265:to redirect to 1164:User:Melonkelon 1133:User:Melonkelon 1108:. I agree with 761: 751: 719: 711: 694: 576: 538:This review is 530: 502: 474: 435: 431: 399: 395: 366: 332:Instant Classic 292: 270: 267: 264: 261: 260: 198: 171: 170: 152: 97: 12: 11: 5: 3119: 3117: 3109: 3108: 3103: 3098: 3093: 3088: 3078: 3077: 3059: 3058: 3052: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3017: 3014: 3013: 3012: 2967: 2966: 2959: 2915: 2914: 2906:Added archive 2884: 2881: 2879: 2878: 2864:requested move 2858: 2857: 2856: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2744: 2743: 2718: 2700:click away to 2690: 2689: 2679: 2667: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2635: 2616: 2615: 2600: 2588: 2587: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2457: 2450: 2442: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2133: 2122: 2115: 2103: 2064:approximately 2021: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1792:WP:Consistency 1774:WP:Consistency 1763: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1599: 1578: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1432: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1125: 1124: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1024: 1023: 1022: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 888: 887: 886: 885: 830: 792: 773: 772: 758:requested move 752: 750: 749:Requested move 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 707:CLOSING REVIEW 677: 676: 643: 640: 637: 634: 631: 628: 625: 622: 619: 616: 613: 610: 603: 596: 575: 572: 549: 548: 532: 531: 529: 528: 523: 518: 512: 509: 508: 504: 503: 501: 500: 498:External links 495: 490: 484: 481: 480: 473: 470: 469: 468: 442:68.150.113.232 430: 429:Hidden Message 427: 426: 425: 394: 391: 377: 365: 362: 328: 327: 313: 291: 288: 285: 284: 281: 280: 277: 276: 274: 271:Album articles 243: 231: 230: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 173: 172: 153: 148:August 1, 2015 128: 127: 125: 117: 116: 113: 112: 109: 102: 94: 93: 90: 83: 79: 78: 75: 72: 68: 67: 59: 58: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3118: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3094: 3092: 3089: 3087: 3084: 3083: 3081: 3074: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3022:Grumpyoldgeek 3011: 3007: 3003: 2998: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2981: 2976: 2975: 2964: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2938: 2934: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2888: 2882: 2877: 2875: 2870: 2865: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2846:In ictu oculi 2843: 2842:Request close 2840: 2839: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2723: 2719: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2665: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2652: 2649:), so if not 2648: 2643: 2639: 2636: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2621: 2618: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2601: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2570: 2542: 2539: 2538: 2534: 2532: 2531: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2507: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2489: 2488: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2455: 2451: 2448: 2443: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2428: 2427: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2188: 2186: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2116: 2113: 2108: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2095: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2067: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1909: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1893:beyond being 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1819: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1809: 1808: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766:Comment only. 1764: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1748: 1743: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1684: 1683: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1624: 1623: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1558: 1552: 1547: 1540: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1512: 1505: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1466: 1461: 1454: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437:In ictu oculi 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1423: 1416: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1394:In ictu oculi 1391: 1390:Shoes (album) 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1327:In ictu oculi 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1228:In ictu oculi 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1200:In ictu oculi 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1173: 1169: 1168:In ictu oculi 1165: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137:In ictu oculi 1134: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1071:In ictu oculi 1068: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 992: 991: 976: 972: 968: 967:In ictu oculi 964: 960: 959: 958: 954: 950: 946: 945: 944: 940: 936: 935:In ictu oculi 932: 927: 926: 925: 921: 917: 912: 911: 910: 906: 902: 901:In ictu oculi 898: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 859: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 831: 829: 826: 822: 819: 818: 817: 816: 812: 808: 807:In ictu oculi 804: 800: 796: 791: 790: 786: 782: 778: 771: 769: 764: 759: 754: 753: 748: 742: 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 724: 722: 716: 714: 708: 702: 698: 693: 692: 691: 690: 686: 682: 674: 673: 668: 667: 662: 661: 656: 655: 650: 649: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 623: 620: 617: 614: 611: 608: 604: 601: 597: 594: 590: 586: 582: 581: 580: 573: 571: 570: 566: 563: 560: 556: 553: 547: 545: 541: 536: 535: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 513: 511: 510: 505: 499: 496: 494: 491: 489: 486: 485: 483: 482: 477: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 454: 453: 451: 447: 443: 439: 428: 424: 421: 419: 415: 414: 413: 412: 408: 404: 402: 392: 390: 389: 385: 381: 375: 371: 363: 361: 360: 356: 352: 347: 346: 343: 337: 336: 333: 326: 322: 318: 314: 312: 307: 306: 305: 304: 300: 295: 289: 275: 258: 254: 250: 249: 244: 241: 237: 236: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 187: 186: 179: 174: 169: 167: 162: 161: 157: 150: 149: 144: 142: 141:Did you know? 136: 132: 126: 123: 119: 118: 110: 108: 107: 103: 100: 99:July 26, 2015 96: 95: 91: 89: 88: 84: 81: 80: 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 60: 55: 53: 52: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3060: 3019: 2996: 2971: 2968: 2948: 2939: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2916: 2889: 2886: 2868: 2861: 2841: 2800: 2717: 2697: 2691: 2669: 2655: 2642:WP:PLURALPLT 2637: 2619: 2571: 2536: 2529: 2528: 2505: 2503: 2493: 2486: 2485: 2446: 2432: 2425: 2424: 2349: 2257: 2182: 2129: 2125: 2118: 2110: 2106: 2097: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2065: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2028: 2024: 2016: 1993: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1906: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1882: 1861: 1850:User:Andrewa 1828: 1824: 1813: 1806: 1805: 1765: 1726: 1703: 1699: 1688: 1681: 1680: 1674: 1670: 1661: 1657: 1628: 1621: 1620: 1601: 1580: 1559: 1523:70.51.46.146 1485: 1310:Non-solution 1309: 1258: 1105: 1026: 998:70.51.46.146 993: 933:jazz album. 930: 866: 832: 820: 793: 776: 774: 762: 755: 720: 712: 706: 678: 670: 664: 658: 654:Melody Maker 652: 646: 607:The Graduate 606: 599: 592: 588: 584: 577: 561: 551: 550: 537: 526:Instructions 436:— Preceding 432: 400: 396: 367: 348: 338: 329: 296: 293: 253:project page 246: 209:WikiProjects 178:Good article 177: 163: 158: 155: 146: 138: 104: 85: 82:June 9, 2014 49: 47: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 3057:soundtrack. 3016:Simon's Age 3002:Richard3120 2933:Sourcecheck 2874:move review 2625:Egsan Bacon 2185:WP:PLURALPT 2087:, you were 2025:most people 1958:There's no 1835:of course. 1753:BarrelProof 1735:WP:PLURALPT 1731:WP:ASTONISH 1606:WP:PLURALPT 1587:per above. 1490:WP:PLURALPT 1386:WP:PLURALPT 1382:WP:ASTONISH 1212:See below. 1178:WP:PLURALPT 845:WP:PLURALPT 837:WP:PLURALPT 768:move review 733:Richard3120 697:Richard3120 681:Richard3120 555:Richard3120 540:transcluded 351:86.149.92.6 3080:Categories 2980:Report bug 2465:Amazon.com 2089:addressing 2020:difficult. 1908:purpose... 1903:good stubs 1778:Richhoncho 1568:Necrothesp 1353:Melonkelon 1289:Richhoncho 1195:Melonkelon 1182:Melonkelon 1151:Melonkelon 1114:Melonkelon 1031:Richhoncho 777:page moved 493:Authorship 479:GA toolbox 257:discussion 145:column on 92:Not listed 37:under the 2963:this tool 2956:this tool 2819:SmokeyJoe 2787:SmokeyJoe 2750:SmokeyJoe 2605:SmokeyJoe 2591:Redirect 2354:SmokeyJoe 2243:SmokeyJoe 1944:article. 1339:Refer to 1259:Solution? 701:Thardin12 552:Reviewer: 516:Templates 507:Reviewing 472:GA Review 135:Main Page 2969:Cheers.— 2805:Dohn joe 2768:Dohn joe 2736:Bookends 2706:Dohn joe 2656:innotata 2593:Bookends 2576:Bookends 2350:Bookends 2262:Dohn joe 2228:Dohn joe 2192:Dohn joe 2155:Dohn joe 2130:bookends 2071:Dohn joe 2066:38 times 2003:Dohn joe 1994:bookends 1946:Dohn joe 1938:Bookends 1930:Bookends 1879:Dohn joe 1866:Dohn joe 1862:bookends 1858:Bookends 1829:bookends 1708:Dohn joe 1671:Bookends 1662:actually 1644:Dohn joe 1611:Bookcase 1538:Gamaliel 1503:Gamaliel 1452:Gamaliel 1414:Gamaliel 1370:Gamaliel 1349:Bookends 1341:Gamaliel 1271:Dohn joe 1214:Dohn joe 1110:Dohn joe 1085:Dohn joe 1045:Dohn joe 1012:Dohn joe 963:bookends 949:Dohn joe 931:Bookends 916:Dohn joe 875:Dohn joe 849:Dohn joe 841:Bookends 795:Bookends 679:Cheers, 600:Bookends 589:Bookends 585:Bookends 565:contribs 521:Criteria 438:unsigned 416:Solved. 380:Bayowolf 315:Agreed. 290:untitled 199:GA-class 160:Bookends 51:reassess 2919:checked 2896:my edit 2764:Bookend 2702:Bookend 2694:Bookend 2683:Bookend 2651:bookend 2638:Support 2620:Support 2597:Bookend 2574:moving 2572:Support 2512:Andrewa 2469:Andrewa 2210:Andrewa 2169:Andrewa 2138:Andrewa 2112:please. 2051:Andrewa 1999:Bookend 1990:Bookend 1976:Andrewa 1972:stumped 1960:perhaps 1942:Bookend 1934:Bookend 1926:Andrewa 1913:Andrewa 1883:bookend 1854:Bookend 1837:Andrewa 1825:Support 1796:Windows 1727:Support 1602:Comment 1585:Bookend 1581:Support 1564:Bookend 1560:Support 1500:, etc. 1408:bookend 1345:Bookend 1267:Bookend 1027:Support 994:Support 871:Bookend 821:Support 418:Str1977 401:— O'Dea 311:Tuf-Kat 299:Bookend 166:Saginaw 137:in the 74:Process 2927:failed 2623:case. 2530:bd2412 2487:bd2412 2447:please 2426:bd2412 1899:barely 1807:bd2412 1800:Window 1742:Chairs 1729:: Per 1682:bd2412 1669:". If 1622:bd2412 1486:Oppose 1106:Oppose 835:. Per 833:Oppose 713:Dom497 262:Albums 228:Albums 205:scale. 111:Listed 77:Result 2677:2,548 2506:books 2224:usage 2153:say. 2114:Done. 1772:. If 1747:Chair 1378:shoes 1067:WP:PA 672:Uncut 542:from 370:Cbben 301:? -- 3068:talk 3041:talk 3026:talk 3006:talk 2997:Done 2923:true 2850:talk 2823:talk 2809:talk 2791:talk 2772:talk 2754:talk 2710:talk 2629:talk 2609:talk 2516:talk 2473:talk 2358:talk 2266:talk 2247:talk 2232:talk 2214:talk 2196:talk 2173:talk 2159:talk 2142:talk 2075:talk 2055:talk 2029:will 2023:The 2007:talk 1980:talk 1968:size 1950:talk 1936:and 1917:talk 1870:talk 1841:talk 1782:talk 1757:talk 1712:talk 1700:more 1648:talk 1593:talk 1572:talk 1545:talk 1527:talk 1510:talk 1498:twin 1494:shoe 1488:per 1459:talk 1441:talk 1421:talk 1398:talk 1357:talk 1331:talk 1293:talk 1275:talk 1232:talk 1218:talk 1204:talk 1186:talk 1172:talk 1155:talk 1141:talk 1118:talk 1089:talk 1075:talk 1049:talk 1035:talk 1016:talk 1002:talk 971:talk 953:talk 939:talk 920:talk 905:talk 879:talk 853:talk 825:╠╣uw 811:talk 785:talk 737:talk 721:talk 699:and 685:talk 666:Mojo 559:talk 462:talk 446:talk 407:talk 384:talk 374:talk 355:talk 321:talk 71:Date 2937:). 2925:or 2910:to 2866:. 2738:to 2698:not 2595:to 2582:or 2094:why 2041:are 2037:are 1737:: " 1589:Deb 867:one 648:NME 342:Ogg 303:Zoe 3082:: 3070:) 3043:) 3028:) 3008:) 2935:}} 2931:{{ 2852:) 2825:) 2811:) 2793:) 2774:) 2766:? 2756:) 2712:) 2687:16 2685:: 2631:) 2611:) 2578:→ 2518:) 2475:) 2360:) 2268:) 2249:) 2234:) 2216:) 2198:) 2175:) 2161:) 2144:) 2077:) 2057:) 2009:) 1982:) 1974:. 1952:) 1919:) 1872:) 1843:) 1784:) 1759:) 1714:) 1650:) 1595:) 1574:) 1529:) 1496:, 1443:) 1400:) 1359:) 1333:) 1320:, 1295:) 1277:) 1234:) 1220:) 1206:) 1188:) 1174:) 1157:) 1143:) 1120:) 1112:. 1091:) 1077:) 1069:? 1051:) 1037:) 1018:) 1004:) 973:) 955:) 941:) 922:) 907:) 881:) 855:) 813:) 797:→ 787:) 760:. 739:) 725:) 687:) 669:, 663:, 651:, 567:) 464:) 448:) 409:) 386:) 376:) 357:) 323:) 129:A 54:it 45:. 3066:( 3039:( 3024:( 3004:( 2982:) 2978:( 2965:. 2958:. 2946:Y 2848:( 2821:( 2807:( 2789:( 2770:( 2752:( 2708:( 2627:( 2607:( 2586:. 2537:T 2514:( 2494:T 2471:( 2433:T 2356:( 2264:( 2245:( 2230:( 2212:( 2194:( 2187:? 2171:( 2157:( 2140:( 2073:( 2053:( 2005:( 1978:( 1948:( 1915:( 1868:( 1839:( 1814:T 1780:( 1755:( 1749:. 1710:( 1689:T 1646:( 1629:T 1591:( 1570:( 1548:) 1542:( 1525:( 1513:) 1507:( 1462:) 1456:( 1439:( 1424:) 1418:( 1396:( 1355:( 1329:( 1291:( 1273:( 1230:( 1216:( 1202:( 1184:( 1170:( 1153:( 1139:( 1116:( 1087:( 1073:( 1047:( 1033:( 1014:( 1000:( 969:( 951:( 937:( 918:( 903:( 877:( 851:( 809:( 783:( 735:( 717:( 703:: 695:@ 683:( 660:Q 562:· 557:( 460:( 444:( 405:( 382:( 372:( 353:( 319:( 259:. 211:: 168:? 151:. 143:" 139:" 56:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index