Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Bajoran

Source šŸ“

225:
youd know this, but obviously, u don't. As for comparing to any one current terorist movement, please feel free to read Rick Bermans comment bellow. Stop mixing reality with Fantasy- you ruin it for every one. besides which , u promote your own ignorance on these matters. If you want to Know The history & current situation of the Israely Arab conflict as well as WW2 history, do your homework & study it impartially, don't bring your personal midiea based information which has no relation to the truth. Leave Star Trek out of your Politics & your politics out of Star tTrek. This decussion is immensly offensive on so many levels, so just keep it to your self!!!!
689:"The Cardassians are written to resemble the Israeli government or Nazis, the Bajorans to resemble Palestinians or Jews: The latter being people occupied or oppressed for decades and struggling to end that condition, sometimes using terrorism and guerrilla tactics, exactly as the Bajorans." According to what source is this true? Or are you just inserting your own POV/original research? It certainly doesn't agree with the quote and link following. 295:
irrelevent-yet-apparently-precious facts wrong. I never had a mullet; I've always had long hair all the way around my head, but often french braid the hair on top and the sides of my head, to keep it out of my eyes, while leaving the back free. For stalkers obsessed purely with knowing me by my photos online, this can be mistaken for a mullet. Especially if they have enough of a provincial mindset, themselves.
74: 53: 22: 272:
you (as a "published" writter) to have more respect for the use of language, i.e., your claim of "as written". BTW, I'll admit to being defensive about Isreal, but I restrict my discussion on that point to where I find it. Your compulsion to insert propaganda in inappropriate topics strikes me as odd. But I'd be happy to keep this discourse on civil terms.
943:. Whilst references are important, I feel we're better off tagging the sections lacking references, before deleting - especially not without any discussion on the Talk page. The in-universe style is something that should be fixed, not deleted. I'll reinstate the material, then we can discuss what may need trimming down, rewriting, or adding references. 794:
years ago, during which time the Bajorans had colonised the planet; then the Cardassians came back to reclaim their ancestral homeworld and in so doing oppressed the erstwhile colonizers. This is not the story we are presented with, however, so it seems odd to claim the story is analogous to the real world Israel/Palestinians conflict.--
1008:
I realize I could simply undo the edits but I wanted to see if everybody, particularly more experienced editors with accounts, was on the same page about this. I propose the quote be restored to its original form or just deleted entirely and the citation applied to the previous sentence (which states
357:
Executive Producer Michael Piller explains her origins as well as the beginnings of DS9: "We had created the Ensign Ro character last season and created a set of aliens in the Bajorans and the Cardassians and a situation that was sort of a Palestinian- or Israeli- or American Indian-tale situation of
152:
Is Lt Ro Laren actually a notable Bajoran? Yes, she was featured in DS9 (which makes her notable as a fictional character on a TV series) but as a Bajoran (to other Bajorans, in the Star Trek universe, and not to people watching the show) she is completely un-notable. She's a mid-ranking officer in
617:
I just reverted this article to an earlier version because of the addition of the sentence about the Israelis and Palestinians, which is not supported by the citation. This is what the cited article says: "We had created the Ensign Ro character last season and created a set of aliens in the Bajorans
256:
If you do a Google search for the words "bajoran" and "Palestinian", the 130+ links you come up with almost all refer to the relationship between them...and other keyword combinations produce other, similar pages. A little effort will reveal references to the intent of the show's makers to make this
768:
I think it's worth noting that millions of Trekkies agree that the Bajorans are idealised Palestinians and the Bajor/Cardassian conflict is a mirror in many, many ways as to that of the Palestine/Israeli conflict. The P/I conflict is the only instance in human history that is anywhere near similar
379:
The Bajorans were created to be synonymous with some modern-day terrorists. This is evident in Ro's speech while in conference with the other senior officers on board the Enterprise, which paints a picture of Bajorans that is reminiscent of the situation as it has been in the Middle East for years.
224:
Any one comparing the whole Bajoran - Cardassian thing to the Israeli Arab conflict and stating that this is fact is misimformed & is being offensive to the Star Trek story. The Cardassians do not resemvle the Natzis & certainly not the Israelis' either. If you knew any history and politics
724:
More to the point: The producer, Rick Berman, explained that the Bajorans were not modeled on any particular group: ā€˜The Kurds, the Palestinians, the Jews in the 1940s, the boat people from Haitiā€”unfortunately, the homeless and terrorism are problems in every ageā€™ (TNG Companion, p. 178).18:59, 11
707:
Michael Pillar's comments are in reference to "Ensign Ro", a fifth season episode of TNG. They do not in any way describe the "situation", however they do describe that particular episode. These comments have been removed since they are inaccurate in the context of this article, as those comments
626:
Again there's some kind of PoV problem revealed by the deletion of the entire section...I have now clarified the paragraph so that the indirect relationship of the quote and the prior description is clear. As with the entire nonsense you guys have been pulling up 'til now, no need to throw out the
271:
Come on, KAZ. Give me one authoritative source, i.e, from the shows writers or producers. Otherwise, you know as well as I do, it's just idle speculation on the part of fans. You of all people should know that relying on the number of hits is resorting to the "Big Lie" concept. I would expect
793:
I'm afraid this comparison doesn't really make sense at all, as the Cardassians in Star Trek were occupying the Bajoran homeworld itself, rather than re-occupying their own homeland. The analogy would work better if the story had been that the Cardassians had left Cardassia Prime several thousand
654:
Your PoV problem here...that you simply don't like the comparison and want to censor it regardless of its accuracy...is painfully true in your repeated deletion of it en masse, instead of simply putting a paragraph space between it or otherwise clarifying the relationship to your own astoundingly
395:
I always saw the Cardassian Occupation and the Bajoran Resistance as Israel and Palestine. The Cardassians were the Israeli's, in being an occupying force striving to hold onto what they have, and the Bajoran's being the Palestinians; desperate enough to do whatever it takes to hold onto whatever
430:
The link is fact...your own PoV motivation is demonstrated by that vague "some" admission...as if it were still debatable when I'm citing a Star Trek producer. It's also revealed any time someone finds one wording acceptable, but when the opposite is proved then suddenly claims the SAME wording,
998:
However, at some point over the years "The Kurds" was removed, leaving it as a list of three analogues. Then, on August 3rd 2017, an unsigned editor replaced "the Jews in the 1940s" with "", erasing one of the three remaining analogues from the middle of the sentence. Hence the quote now reads:
324:
The introduction of religion as a recurring motif is the next highly unusual step, something that is alien to Star Trek at all (may the role of Sisko as the Emissary coincide with that of Cmdr. Sinclair as Valen on Babylon 5?), especially when it is connected with a central character. This also
245:
It is far from a statement of fact. The forced labor aspect in the paragraph topic sentence makes it a palpably false anology. Even if the ST writers were thinking along these lines (which I doubt), what they came up with is a hybred. Unless you can come up with a quote; you are projecting a
464:
Star Trek producer, and actually, it's your POV, and the exact quote says something else than what you claim. It refers to U.S. and Indians as well, for one thing. It's a brief quote, and says exactly what it means, as opposed to your re-write, which says something quite different.
250:
The internment camp reference actually fits in quite well, since that's where the Israeli government keeps hundreds of thousands of the Palestinians. When you see references to Israeli troops raiding or shelling camps with missiles, tanks, and bulldozers, that's what they're talking
672:
If that is true, then you have no business being here because you don't know the situation. But even then, one must wonder how you're unable to understand my repeated explanations that the sentence is NOT interpreting the producer, and was here BEFORE the producer's quote, which
294:
The strangest thing about the Kaz stalkers, even more than their strange obsession with adding factoids about me as if they were relevent to a debate..."You're wrong about the application of Say's Law here: You used to work in a pet store!" is their bizarre tendency to get those
590:
You provided no "quote", but your POV version of the quote, which said something quite different. Whoever you imagine you worked this out with, it wasn't me. And it is your "context" that is the only POV in the section in question, the quote itself is quite clear and NPOV.
663:
I have no idea what you're talking about. There is a quote from a producer, saying the show is about X. You keep adding a sentence, claiming that really the show is about Y. You're distorting what he said, and so I deleted your interpretive sentence, and left his quote.
677:. The text was there BEFORE the quote. The quote was added as a separate reference to the same subject. If you think the two are easily confused, then SEPARATE them better, instead of censoring the part you simply don't like because of your obvious PoV problem 618:
and the Cardassians and a situation that was sort of a Palestinian- or Israeli- or American Indian-tale situation of a disenfranchised people dominated for years." The Knowledge (XXG) article can't expand on that as though paraphrasing the referenced article.
968:
version that I deleted the unsourced material!) So mass deleting just has the problem that as material gets added back in, it will have the same problems - as well as the wasted effort in rewriting. Let's fix the problems rather than going in circles.
183:
and an enemy of Bajor. Ziyalā€™s mother, to whom we are never introduced, was a Bajoran but Ziyal still looks much more Cardassian than anything else. Ziyal is a Cardassian-Bajoran hybrid and as such to call her a notable Bajoran would be like calling
635:
Kaz, you've reverted more than three times in 24 hours. This will get you a 24-hour block if you keep doing it (I'm not an admin, by the way, so that's not a warning, I'm just informing you). Why won't you just let the producer speak for himself?
334:
The Cardassians are a powerful militaristic race of intergalactic Nazis first seen on Star Trek: The Next Generation. The image they call to mind is of a sophisticated Spartan race: arrogant, intelligent, and cruel, for whom beauty only exists in
517:
I wasn't here before, I'm here now. Your POV has completely changed the meaning of a direct quote. The only reason for replacing a brief, direct quote with a POV description of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is to display your own POV.
444:
The simple fact is that we often put something in our own words...this is not an encyclopedia purely of quotations. There's nothing PoV about the way I put it...which I worked out with a self-professed Israel defender...and it goes back.
648:
added anyway, and stands as a separate part of the same paragraph, not as an interpretation of what the producer says. It's ridiculous to claim that if a quote is made, then no other text may be added on anything relating to the
284:
Personally, I'm not inserting propoganda, but observing a fact. I will do so even if it's "my side" which looks bad; it's foolish and bigoted to defend something out of personal reasons in a setting like this. You won't find
387:
There is also a hugely-missed subplot here, folks. The Bajorans were originally introduced as ST's version of the Palestinians, fighting for their freedom from the wicked and much bigger and more supplied Cardassian foes.
372:
The Bajoran/Cardassian conflict always seemed like a veiled allegory for the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. The Bajoran people resort to terrorist/guerrilla tactics to combat an oppressive occupying group
989:
One of the first citations in the current version of the page is producer Rick Berman's comments on real-life analogues to the Bajorans, taken from p. 178 of 'Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion'
246:
political opinion (which you are certainly entitled to have); however, you are doing so in an inappropriate topic. Keep the entry relevant and true. BTW, are you still wearing the mullet? Jinxian
921:
which leads to Vedek#Religion (now a redirect), I'm guessing there was a ton of information from expanded universe that's been deleted. Anyone know the history on this? Anyone want to build up the
779:
Yep. A fantasy version in which the United States (the Federation) does the right thing by siding against the occupiers instead of lionizing them because of a grotesque view of identity politics.
627:
baby with the bathwater. It starts seeming like you guys just don't like the comparison, no matter how true it is, and are twisting and spinning in order to find an excuse to delete it.
644:
And what, precisely, am I supposed to do when someone keeps mass-deleting valid text with a completely false excuse given? The text you keep deleting pre-existed the quotation, which
1005:
This strikes me as a fairly clearcut case of POV editing, or at the very least a rather bizarre convention if the page is going to directly quote any of Berman's statement at all.
959:
Done. I've deleted some obvious unsourced/speculative material. There's probably more that could go to, but doing it on a case by case basis is better than a mass delete.
279:
As I said, you can find references to the producers'/writers' intent if you dig through all the trekkies' pages. Personally, I'm not enough of a fanboy to do it for you.
708:
refer to a particular episode and not to the Cardassian/Bajoran conflict in general. The user is welcome to add those comments to an article about that episode. --
769:
to the B/C conflict and is quite visibly a comparative whether intentionally or not. This is backed up by thousands of websites that discuss the topic in depth.
875: 865: 130: 1111: 120: 995:"The Kurds, the Palestinians, the Jews in the 1940s, the boat people from Haitiā€”unfortunately, the homeless and terrorism are problems in every age" 1045:
Yes, it was corrected for about a year but for some reason in October 2021 an IP removed "in the 1940s" without explanation. Should be fixed again.
1116: 96: 892: 431:
simply with the roles reversed, is somehow PoV. I took the existing wording and simply placed the Palestinian/Israeli reference in it, and
262:
That you have some bizarre obsession with denying this is your own problem. I guess it's inevitable that some Kaz stalkers show up here...
195: 1106: 1031: 1016: 154: 795: 780: 92: 81: 58: 1046: 917:, but this page has practically *no* information about the different political and religious heirarchies on Bajor. From the link on 91:-related topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 33: 746:
The whole article needs citations. I don't know the series well enough to know the episode titles off the top of my head. --
413:
The link has been made by some, but your POV on the conflict is not relevant to the article. Quote the people in question.
559:
the Israelis. It's not going now, just because you've decided your PoV is better served by the quote left without context.
380:
Much of the Bajoran settlement that Picard, Worf, Data, and Ro visit is reminiscent of the Palestinian resettlement camps.
1030:
As of Nov 2021 the comment is still altered from the original, and contains no punctuation ... to show missing portions.
555:
the quote, and is completely valid. In fact, as I said, I worked it out with someone who described themselves as biased
1082:
Hierarchy states: "A new Kai is elected by the Vedek Assembly". This seems to contradict the section Politics : -->
1064: 289:
deleting valid points which are embarassing to something with which I associate. It's a sign of a sort of bigotry.
838: 819: 402:
I could go on...I can list literally hundreds of references as much or more authoritative as the ONE you list.
199: 750: 238:
The entry you keep corrupting is a statement of fact. If you don't like it, that's your own political problem.
39: 158: 1035: 1020: 833:
Yet another stubby article about the Bajorans that deserves about a paragraph in this one to strengthen it.
784: 1050: 1012: 1002:"the Palestinians, the boat people from Haiti ā€” unfortunately, the homeless and terrorism are problems ." 405:
The NPoV Bajoran=Palestinian observation stays, and I'm fixing the Cardassian page to be as accurate, too.
191: 930: 799: 153:
Starfleet, a member of the resistance (one of millions), and not particularly important as an individual.
1088: 1060: 853: 359: 337: 770: 490:
So it was OK when Cardassians = Nazis, but not the same wording with Cardassians = Israeli Government?
396:
they could and if they could hold onto to anything they'd do the next best thing...kill Cardassians...
373: 834: 815: 1084: 21: 734: 713: 347: 964:
I also note that the new version of the article had the same problems (in fact, it was from the
926: 397: 861: 353:
Actually, I have the Executive producer from DS9 on my side, and half the Star Trek viewers:
857: 906: 888: 694: 665: 637: 619: 596: 523: 470: 418: 655:
high standards without actually getting rid of the bit which doesn't conform to your PoV
366: 235:
KAZvorpal -- please stop being aspergian and keep your politics to an appropriate forum.
868:
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
303:
That answer about the mullet told me everything about you I need to know. Go in peace.
1083:
Kai which states: "The Kai is chosen in an election held by the entire Bajoran people"
974: 948: 755: 747: 730: 709: 678: 656: 628: 560: 495: 446: 406: 343: 312: 296: 263: 239: 1100: 551:
Actually, I was the one who supplied the quote, as a reference. The wording was here
864:
when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an
389: 327: 381: 918: 690: 592: 519: 494:
is the PoV corruption. Stop trying to cram your own political agenda into it.
466: 414: 316: 180: 168: 1009:
the Bajorans were 'likened to a variety of ethnic groups' by the writers).
970: 944: 87: 325:
invokes the analogy of the Bajorans as Jews, and the Cardassians as Nazis.
73: 52: 1039: 1024: 922: 914: 307:
Removed POV linking Cardassians as Israel and Bajorans as "Palestinian"
172: 992:
The quote in its full form has been present on the page since 2005:
860:, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the 910: 185: 176: 729:
Great quote. If you can provide more context that would help. --
85:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all 881:
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
1092: 1068: 1054: 978: 952: 934: 896: 842: 823: 803: 788: 773: 758: 203: 162: 15: 878:
on the image's description page for the use in this article.
95:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 686:
KAZ, I can see your mouth foaming04:10, 2005 Jan 9 (UTC)
365:"This is TNG's take on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict" 275:
And, you didn't answer my question about the mulletĀ :-)
941: 311:
There is no evidence for the unattributed reference by
848:Image copyright problem with File:KiraNerys001.jpg 315:, and I have chosen to duplicate information from 358:a disenfranchised people dominated for years." 891:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 8: 1059:This has been corrected again Dec 11 2023. 1010: 814:Stubby article that should be moved here. 189: 47: 893:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 856:is used in this article under a claim of 49: 19: 105:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Star Trek 7: 79:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 925:page to include this information? 14: 1112:Mid-importance Star Trek articles 228:A really angree Star Trek lover. 435:it's PoV, when it wasn't before? 319:which is essentially accurate. 72: 51: 20: 887:This is an automated notice by 125:This article has been rated as 1117:WikiProject Star Trek articles 940:The mass deletion occurred at 204:21:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 108:Template:WikiProject Star Trek 1: 1069:04:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC) 1055:00:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 1040:20:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 1025:15:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 935:22:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC) 810:Merge Bajoran Resistance here 789:20:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 774:15:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 163:02:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 862:requirements for such images 897:16:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 843:18:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 824:06:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 1133: 1107:C-Class Star Trek articles 1081:The section Religion : --> 759:15:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 703:Comments by Michael Piller 175:even though her father is 131:project's importance scale 985:Edits to Berman's Comment 979:22:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 953:22:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 804:16:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 668:03:57, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC) 640:03:44, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC) 622:03:14, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC) 124: 67: 46: 1093:21:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC) 737:01:25, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) 716:10:36, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 699:04:22, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 409:00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 350:02:55, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) 242:18:08, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) 984: 720:Comments by Rick Berman 681:04:03, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 659:03:52, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 631:03:35, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 601:02:59, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 563:02:52, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 528:02:16, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 498:02:00, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 475:01:52, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 449:01:48, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 423:01:01, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) 266:21:56, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) 876:non-free use rationale 28:This article is rated 854:File:KiraNerys001.jpg 829:The Circle merge here 82:WikiProject Star Trek 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 111:Star Trek articles 34:content assessment 1027: 1015:comment added by 913:both redirect to 697: 599: 526: 473: 460:The "some" means 421: 206: 194:comment added by 145: 144: 141: 140: 137: 136: 1124: 1061:Babeswayscaptcha 874:That there is a 753: 742:Citations needed 725:Jan 2005 (UTC)~ 695: 597: 524: 471: 419: 221: 220: 216: 148:Notable Bajorans 113: 112: 109: 106: 103: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1097: 1096: 1079: 987: 907:Kai (Star Trek) 904: 850: 835:Judgesurreal777 831: 816:Judgesurreal777 812: 766: 751: 744: 722: 705: 675:I added, myself 309: 222: 218: 214: 212: 211: 150: 110: 107: 104: 101: 100: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1130: 1128: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1099: 1098: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 986: 983: 982: 981: 961: 960: 956: 955: 903: 900: 885: 884: 883: 882: 879: 849: 846: 830: 827: 811: 808: 807: 806: 791: 765: 762: 743: 740: 739: 738: 721: 718: 704: 701: 685: 683: 682: 661: 660: 651: 650: 633: 632: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 453: 452: 451: 450: 439: 438: 437: 436: 425: 424: 400: 399: 392: 391: 384: 383: 376: 375: 369: 368: 362: 361: 340: 339: 330: 329: 308: 305: 302: 300: 299: 291: 290: 281: 280: 270: 268: 267: 259: 258: 253: 252: 233: 231: 210: 208: 196:198.200.115.29 149: 146: 143: 142: 139: 138: 135: 134: 127:Mid-importance 123: 117: 116: 114: 77: 65: 64: 62:Midā€‘importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1129: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1076: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1032:71.63.160.210 1028: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017:131.111.5.182 1014: 1006: 1003: 1000: 996: 993: 990: 980: 976: 972: 967: 963: 962: 958: 957: 954: 950: 946: 942: 939: 938: 937: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 901: 899: 898: 894: 890: 880: 877: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 867: 863: 859: 855: 847: 845: 844: 840: 836: 828: 826: 825: 821: 817: 809: 805: 801: 797: 792: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 772: 763: 761: 760: 757: 754: 749: 741: 736: 732: 728: 727: 726: 719: 717: 715: 711: 702: 700: 698: 692: 687: 680: 676: 671: 670: 669: 667: 658: 653: 652: 647: 643: 642: 641: 639: 630: 625: 624: 623: 621: 600: 594: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 562: 558: 554: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 527: 521: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 497: 493: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 474: 468: 463: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 448: 443: 442: 441: 440: 434: 429: 428: 427: 426: 422: 416: 412: 411: 410: 408: 403: 398: 394: 393: 390: 386: 385: 382: 378: 377: 374: 371: 370: 367: 364: 363: 360: 356: 355: 354: 351: 349: 345: 338: 336: 332: 331: 328: 326: 322: 321: 320: 318: 314: 306: 304: 298: 293: 292: 288: 283: 282: 278: 277: 276: 273: 265: 261: 260: 255: 254: 249: 248: 247: 243: 241: 236: 232: 229: 226: 217: 209: 207: 205: 201: 197: 193: 187: 182: 178: 174: 171:as a notable 170: 167:Also it list 165: 164: 160: 156: 155:72.137.187.50 147: 132: 128: 122: 119: 118: 115: 98: 94: 90: 89: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1080: 1077:Kai election 1029: 1011:ā€”Ā Preceding 1007: 1004: 1001: 997: 994: 991: 988: 965: 927:Alphachimera 905: 886: 851: 832: 813: 796:129.11.13.73 781:147.9.177.90 771:211.30.71.59 767: 764:Palestinians 745: 723: 706: 688: 684: 674: 662: 645: 634: 616: 556: 552: 491: 461: 432: 404: 401: 352: 341: 333: 323: 310: 301: 286: 274: 269: 244: 237: 234: 230: 227: 223: 190:ā€”Ā Preceding 166: 151: 126: 93:project page 86: 80: 40:WikiProjects 1047:73.38.7.120 866:explanation 1101:Categories 919:Winn Adami 889:FairuseBot 852:The image 731:Viriditas 710:Viriditas 344:Viriditas 317:Cardassian 181:Cardassian 169:Tora Ziyal 97:discussion 1085:Soji Asha 335:strength. 313:Kazvorpal 179:who is a 102:Star Trek 88:Star Trek 59:Star Trek 1013:unsigned 858:fair use 257:analogy. 192:unsigned 188:human. 923:Bajoran 915:Bajoran 756:ng Aili 173:Bajoran 129:on the 30:C-class 696:(Talk) 691:Jayjg 649:topic. 598:(Talk) 593:Jayjg 557:toward 553:before 525:(Talk) 520:Jayjg 472:(Talk) 467:Jayjg 420:(Talk) 415:Jayjg 251:about. 213:": --> 36:scale. 911:Vedek 492:There 186:Spock 177:Dukat 1089:talk 1065:talk 1051:talk 1036:talk 1021:talk 975:talk 971:Mdwh 949:talk 945:Mdwh 931:talk 909:and 895:. -- 839:talk 820:talk 800:talk 785:talk 735:Talk 714:Talk 666:Slim 638:Slim 620:Slim 348:Talk 215:edit 200:talk 159:talk 966:new 902:Kai 679:Kaz 657:Kaz 629:Kaz 561:Kaz 496:Kaz 462:one 447:Kaz 433:now 407:Kaz 297:Kaz 264:Kaz 240:Kaz 121:Mid 1103:: 1091:) 1067:) 1053:) 1038:) 1023:) 977:) 951:) 933:) 841:) 822:) 802:) 787:) 733:| 712:| 693:| 595:| 522:| 469:| 417:| 346:| 342:-- 287:me 202:) 161:) 1087:( 1063:( 1049:( 1034:( 1019:( 973:( 947:( 929:( 837:( 818:( 798:( 783:( 752:a 748:F 646:I 219:] 198:( 157:( 133:. 99:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Star Trek
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Star Trek
Star Trek
project page
discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
72.137.187.50
talk
02:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Tora Ziyal
Bajoran
Dukat
Cardassian
Spock
unsigned
198.200.115.29
talk
21:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Kaz
Kaz
Kaz
Kazvorpal
Cardassian

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘