111:
84:
121:
214:
226:
53:
503:
21:
548:
269:
421:
It's clear you are passionate about this candidate, but the requirement remains consensus. The
Knowledge (XXG) community did you a favor by retaining a redirect page for this person. If you continue to recreate this page without consensus, I will renominate it for deletion, and this time I will argue
406:
Most of the commentators at the AfD said the page should be recreated if he becomes the actual
Republican nominee. That cannot happen until the primary, 11 months from now, in September 2012. At this point he is the only declared candidate, but other better-known candidates are expected to declare as
320:
And in the decision, it says "Can be recreated if he meets the normal notability criteria (i.e., substantial third party coverage)." I claim that has now been met. Coverage in
Barrington Patch, Westerly Sun, and Boston Globe since September 30th. I am asking you to review my evidence and be persuaded
472:
The
Knowledge (XXG) community did not "do me a favor". I am new to this article. I read about Barry, and came to Knowledge (XXG) to research him. When I discovered that some useful information was hiding in a deleted article, I thought "gosh, this should really be available to others, given that his
398:
The closing administrator said the page could be recreated if there was "substantial third party coverage", but that has not happened. The coverage since then is purely "horse race" reporting, such as the amount of money he has raised; it is not substantial coverage about him. The only article I
279:
I consider this to be significant coverage in the place that matters, which is Rhode Island. He is considered the
Republican challenger to a sitting US Senator. It makes Knowledge (XXG) look bad not to have this article. It certainly needs to be improved, but it is a start.
417:
Being the first (and so far only) person to declare his candidacy does not make him "the candidate". If someone were to declare right now that they are a candidate for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, would that make them "the
Republican candidate"?
458:
Toddst1, I recreated the page because at the end of our discussion, you put a strikethrough on your SALTed statement. I thought this meant that you had reviewed the articles and changed your mind. I am sorry if that was in
466:, as it is definitely substantial coverage by a real newspaper. By no means is it just reporting on funds raised. It is certainly more in depth than the payment one, so I just have to assume that you didn't see this one.
600:
469:
I never said that he was "the candidate". In fact, I edited that out before recreating the page, among other things. I did real work cleaning up the page before recreating it. Please check my edits.
151:
395:
I am going to return this page to a redirect. That was the consensus opinion at the AfD discussion, and it can only be overcome by consensus (such as by discussion here at this page).
168:
411:
37:
531:
296:
204:
31:
595:
590:
194:
158:
610:
605:
244:
463:
620:
163:
615:
134:
89:
239:
94:
400:
476:
Again, I thought I had reached consensus with Toddst1. That's just a miscommunication, and I accept responsibility if that was my fault.
569:
146:
321:
to this conclusion as well. We do not need to involve anyone else. You and I are empowered to resolve this per the decision itself.
142:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
64:
27:
410:
Meanwhile
Hinckley is regarded as such a long shot that polling companies don't even include his name in surveys; see
509:
70:
52:
565:
484:
381:
326:
285:
126:
20:
231:
427:
350:
110:
83:
561:
536:
480:
443:
408:
377:
363:
322:
309:
281:
340:
354:
346:
300:
274:
376:
I was just trying to get to the right answer. I take
Knowledge (XXG) seriously as well.
303:, but I don't think you'll have much luck there right now. See my comment in the AFD.
584:
423:
139:
213:
438:
358:
304:
221:
116:
138:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
403:, and it is more about the phone-payment technology than it is about him.
437:
I've protected the page. Enough disruption from his partisan supporters.
575:
540:
488:
448:
431:
385:
368:
330:
314:
289:
412:
United States Senate election in Rhode Island, 2012#Republican primary
422:
against a redirect page, on the grounds that it is being abused. --
497:
46:
15:
212:
266:
Based on the following dialogue, I am recreating the page:
601:
Redirect-Class United States articles of Low-importance
399:
found that gives him more than a passing mention is
297:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Barry
Hinckley
299:is where the decision was made. Your only venue is
38:
United States Senate election in Rhode Island, 2012
532:2012 United States Senate election in Rhode Island
63:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
351:drop the stick and back away from the horse
494:Protected edit request on 14 December 2018
78:
462:MelanieN, I really would beg you to scan
179:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
30:on 3 September 2011 (UTC). The result of
295:I'm not the one you need to convince -
80:
596:Low-importance United States articles
591:Redirect-Class United States articles
132:This redirect is within the scope of
50:
7:
611:Low-importance Rhode Island articles
606:Redirect-Class Rhode Island articles
473:press has increased since that AfD."
69:It is of interest to the following
621:WikiProject United States articles
182:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
616:WikiProject Rhode Island articles
546:
501:
454:I need to clarify a few things:
224:
199:This redirect has been rated as
119:
109:
82:
51:
19:
26:This article was nominated for
237:This redirect is supported by
1:
576:22:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
541:16:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
489:05:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
449:04:58, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
432:13:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
386:05:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
369:04:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
331:01:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
315:15:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
290:10:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
524:to reactivate your request.
512:has been answered. Set the
637:
407:the election comes closer.
205:project's importance scale
534:instead to fix a double.
220:
198:
135:WikiProject United States
104:
77:
240:WikiProject Rhode Island
140:United States of America
217:
185:United States articles
530:Redirect the page to
357:is patently obvious.
216:
355:conflict of interest
127:United States portal
232:Rhode Island portal
153:Articles Requested!
339:The page has been
218:
65:content assessment
574:
528:
527:
447:
367:
313:
259:
258:
255:
254:
251:
250:
45:
44:
628:
558:
557:
550:
549:
539:
519:
515:
505:
504:
498:
441:
361:
307:
234:
229:
228:
227:
187:
186:
183:
180:
177:
129:
124:
123:
122:
113:
106:
105:
100:
97:
86:
79:
56:
55:
47:
23:
16:
636:
635:
631:
630:
629:
627:
626:
625:
581:
580:
555:
547:
535:
517:
513:
502:
496:
393:
349:or better yet,
264:
230:
225:
223:
184:
181:
178:
175:
174:
173:
159:Become a Member
125:
120:
118:
98:
92:
12:
11:
5:
634:
632:
624:
623:
618:
613:
608:
603:
598:
593:
583:
582:
579:
578:
526:
525:
506:
495:
492:
478:
477:
474:
470:
467:
460:
452:
451:
392:
389:
374:
373:
372:
371:
318:
317:
263:
260:
257:
256:
253:
252:
249:
248:
245:Low-importance
236:
235:
219:
209:
208:
201:Low-importance
197:
191:
190:
188:
172:
171:
166:
161:
156:
149:
147:Template Usage
143:
131:
130:
114:
102:
101:
99:Low‑importance
87:
75:
74:
68:
57:
43:
42:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
633:
622:
619:
617:
614:
612:
609:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
588:
586:
577:
573:
571:
567:
563:
553:
545:
544:
543:
542:
538:
533:
523:
520:parameter to
511:
507:
500:
499:
493:
491:
490:
486:
482:
475:
471:
468:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
450:
445:
440:
436:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
419:
415:
413:
409:
404:
402:
396:
390:
388:
387:
383:
379:
370:
365:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
342:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
316:
311:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
277:
276:
272:
271:
267:
261:
246:
243:(assessed as
242:
241:
233:
222:
215:
211:
210:
206:
202:
196:
193:
192:
189:
176:United States
170:
167:
165:
162:
160:
157:
155:
154:
150:
148:
145:
144:
141:
137:
136:
128:
117:
115:
112:
108:
107:
103:
96:
91:
90:United States
88:
85:
81:
76:
72:
66:
62:
58:
54:
49:
48:
40:
39:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
559:
551:
537:SkyGazer 512
529:
521:
510:edit request
481:Scott Illini
479:
464:this article
453:
420:
416:
405:
397:
394:
378:Scott Illini
375:
338:
323:Scott Illini
319:
282:Scott Illini
278:
273:
268:
265:
238:
200:
164:Project Talk
152:
133:
95:Rhode Island
71:WikiProjects
60:
36:redirect to
35:
585:Categories
514:|answered=
341:WP:SALTed
424:MelanieN
401:this one
391:Redirect
345:Take it
262:Untitled
61:redirect
28:deletion
439:Toddst1
359:Toddst1
353:. Your
305:Toddst1
203:on the
459:error.
347:WP:DRV
301:WP:DRV
169:Alerts
67:scale.
556:Amory
518:|ans=
508:This
59:This
552:Done
485:talk
444:talk
428:talk
382:talk
364:talk
327:talk
310:talk
286:talk
275:WRNI
270:News
34:was
554:~
516:or
195:Low
587::
568:•
564:•
522:no
487:)
430:)
414:.
384:)
329:)
288:)
247:).
93::
572:)
570:c
566:t
562:u
560:(
483:(
446:)
442:(
426:(
380:(
366:)
362:(
343:.
325:(
312:)
308:(
284:(
207:.
73::
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
