271:. My main motivation was that Beal and Fermat-Catalan conjectures heavily overlap (on this wiki, for example: apart from being useful for their multiples, triples of exponents containing a 2 are relevant for the Fermat-Catalan than for the Beal conjecture) and fitted really well in this larger frame. Even without going to the point of the Generalised generalised Fermat Equation Ax^p + By^q = Cz^r (which still makes sense in my opinion because such equations are closely linked to the former x^p + y^q = z^r in both results and solving techniques), I propose to do the same here: create a
84:
74:
53:
162:
22:
283:
articles and subsequently make those two redirect to the new article. Also, this would be maybe help mitigate what some contributors seem to feel like a billionaire attempt to leave his name in history: there wouldn't be an article named Beal conjecture anymore, although the new article would still
197:
I think we should store a historical record on all of those who have previously tried to solve the Beal
Conjecture, that way when it is proved or disproved we can see all of the people who tried and compared to that one mathematician who actually solved it. Thoughts? I believe the answer to this
249:
140:
306:
Could you please take a look at my research called "On Beal's
Conjecture, the Case (x,y,z)=(n,2n-1,n)" and possibly include it as a partial result of Beal's conjecture?
403:
238:
It is unfortunate to say a "solution" is to "the Beal conjecture". Each "solution" referred to here is a point (A,B,C) of the locus {(A,B,C) ∈ ℕ | A + B = C}.
398:
130:
393:
106:
307:
205:
321:
355:
253:
176:
97:
58:
339:
354:
The reference to Andrew Beal says that it was formulated by him in 1933, but the linked article says he was born in 1952.
33:
276:
272:
369:
No, it says "The conjecture was formulated in 1993", and the article has not been edited since August . . . . -
209:
311:
21:
359:
172:
39:
83:
335:
331:
327:
201:
289:
161:
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
73:
52:
268:
233:
Any solutions to the Beal conjecture will necessarily involve three terms all of which are ....
374:
280:
168:
285:
387:
370:
102:
79:
378:
363:
343:
315:
293:
257:
213:
248:
I hope someone who knows about this conjecture will make such a change.
245:. It is wrong to say that it is a solution to the "Beal conjecture".
269:
the French
Knowledge article about the Generalised Fermat Equation
198:
conjecture will be coming sooner rather than later (hint, hint).
156:
15:
241:
It is entirely correct to say that (A,B,C) is a solution
275:
article in which we move all the contents from both
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
180:
8:
320:I would like to get endorsed to submit this
263:Merging Beal and Fermat-Catalan conjectures
19:
199:
47:
404:Pages translated from Russian Knowledge
250:2600:1700:E1C0:F340:4D88:6C4F:C0E3:A053
49:
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
399:Low-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
394:Start-Class mathematics articles
160:
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
135:This article has been rated as
1:
379:11:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
364:00:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
284:name the conjecture as such.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
350:The reference to Andrew Beal
214:20:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
344:16:54, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
316:12:07, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
273:Generalised Fermat equation
420:
294:14:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
277:Fermat-Catalan conjecture
258:22:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
243:to the equation A + B = C
134:
67:
46:
228:contains this sentence:
141:project's priority scale
322:partial Beal's solution
193:Storing historical data
98:WikiProject Mathematics
28:This article is rated
220:Poor choice of words
121:mathematics articles
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
330:comment added by
216:
204:comment added by
187:
186:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
411:
346:
226:Related examples
164:
157:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
384:
383:
352:
325:
301:
281:Beal conjecture
265:
222:
195:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
417:
415:
407:
406:
401:
396:
386:
385:
382:
381:
351:
348:
308:196.89.222.141
300:
299:Partial result
297:
264:
261:
221:
218:
206:137.229.183.74
194:
191:
189:
185:
184:
165:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
391:
389:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
356:192.249.3.142
349:
347:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
323:
318:
317:
313:
309:
304:
298:
296:
295:
291:
287:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:I just wrote
262:
260:
259:
255:
251:
246:
244:
239:
236:
234:
229:
227:
219:
217:
215:
211:
207:
203:
192:
190:
182:
178:
177:Гипотеза Биля
174:
170:
167:This article
166:
163:
159:
158:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
353:
326:— Preceding
319:
305:
302:
266:
247:
242:
240:
237:
232:
230:
225:
224:The section
223:
200:— Preceding
196:
188:
181:ru.wikipedia
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
173:translation
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
388:Categories
332:Marouane r
324:to ARXIV
286:Astaulphe
340:contribs
328:unsigned
202:unsigned
169:contains
371:Arjayay
139:on the
36:scale.
179:from
375:talk
360:talk
336:talk
312:talk
303:Hi.
290:talk
279:and
254:talk
210:talk
175:of
131:Low
390::
377:)
362:)
342:)
338:•
314:)
292:)
256:)
235:"
212:)
171:a
373:(
358:(
334:(
310:(
288:(
252:(
231:"
208:(
183:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
