2960:, I was thinking of showcasing other sports as well because it would be great to promote the article from a good article to a featured article. I am not a skateboarder myself, but a lot of my friends used to be, so hence why I have some decent knowledge on that subject and want to contribute to spruce the article up with some updated information as a lot of them seem outdated to standards. Hope that is ok :). I always want to ask before commmencing action. Trying this new BDR method. If its a problem, please let me know but I like to do my part to help out. Majority of images have not been replaced --
3155:
on Trove and the only articles from the 40s are about the Paris and
American designs, no mention of anyone doing any in Australia. At the end of the day, given how much has been written about the bikini and how much scrutiny it has received, really, it's extremely unlikely that Paula Stafford, who had been giving interviews and talks and talking about bikinis since the 1950s, and was so famous for being a bikini designer, wouldn't have had her alleged 1943 innovation come to light LONG before now. It's clearly a major misreporting that nobody fact-checked.
204:
issues. (3) Relevant images have been removed and irrelevant once brought back in. For example
Annette Kellerman's one piece is a swimsuit which has nothing to do with a bikini; otherwise why not discuss the history of swimsuits and perhaps obscenity laws? Also, why change the example of a monokini? Why do all other images of bikini styles use forward shots, while the restored monokini image is a back shot? Is there some agenda behind the choice? The tankini image that was replaced was a closer shot than the one restored.
603:"Sun protective clothing is made with specialized fabrics that prevent UV from passing though the weave and designed to provide as much skin coverage as possible... Most warm weather clothing – sleeveless blouses, backless sun-dresses, shorts, bikinis, t-shirts are clearly not designed for sun protection." Of course, I can't prove a negative – but for Knowledge, the burden is in the other direction. We're not supposed to list commercial products without reliable evidence verifying their existence and notability.
2949:
31:
855:
3220:
tell the story until the 1920s. Many accounts give a different location (such as New Jersey) or different dates. Several histories of bathing suits agree that the story (even though attested to by
Kellermann herself) is not true. I agree -- I researched this for my book Lost Wonderland, which covers Kellermann's visit to Revere (which took place in 1908, not 1907). -- Stephen R. Wilk
149:(too much detail to have in this article. I also tried to keep the use of images to highest relevance, keeping in mind that this is an easy article to degenerate into a picture album from an encyclopedic entry. If the editor(s) who made those changes have their rationale that can be stated, I invite them to post here before they revert.
3239:"Meanwhile, the bikini had become the most popular beachwear around the globe." I assume this should read "... the most popular woman's beachwear ...." And I wonder if it is even correct for women, considering the beachwear in India, the Koreas, Iran, and the many women and girls in Western countries who wear one-piece swimsuits.
3150:. What it looks like is that someone got their years mixed up (1943 is when Paula Stafford married and moved to the Gold Coast) and everyone else ran with it - the 1943 claims all seem to have instantly popped up at the same time as her death and are mainly reported in obituaries and death announcements. I had a search through
1369:
Both The
Telegraph and The People are very mainstream publications. Both has won multiple prestigious awards for fine journalism. What is your complaint against them? Also, you can't discard academic evidence on the basis of argument like "it discusses German etc. more than English". Besides, Sub-par
118:
The images you deleted are more appropriate to the article than the ones you left in. For example, an image of a two-piece swimsuit of the 1930s is more appropriate in a precursor section than a one-piece. Similarly, an image of
Italian swimsuits in 1948 is important and relevant because it shows the
102:
I also reduced the number of images in the history section. It is strongly recommended that images without a very specific documentary value are not put into the article. I tried one image per section, except for the section that deal with types of bikinis. Please, explain why the removed images need
988:
I'm talking about the attributes of one specific image, not the specifics of its background or whatever. I'm generally in favor of illustrating garments that are worn by actual people and I simply don't see any obvious objectification in this particular example. Call my choices however odd you want,
863:
I'm really curious to know why a photo of a young woman wearing a bikini at the beach is considered inappropriate for the lead. It seems like a pretty rare example of an image that actually shows a fairly normal bikini in a setting where bikinis are actually used by most people. It doesn't strike me
459:
Similarly, the
Sanctuary Fabric polymer "feels like a plastic tarp," which is why it was used for "hat brims." The marketing director said "the real advantage would be to turn it into swimsuit material," effectively admitting that the company wasn't able to do this. If we ever find a reliable source
3219:
beach for wearing form-fitting sleeveless one-piece knitted swimming tights that covered her from neck to toe, a costume she adopted from
England,". In fact, no such arrest took place. There are no contemporary news reports of it or police records corroborating the event. Kellermann herself did not
3154:
and Paula
Stafford doesn't appear until the 1950s - it seems improbable that she wouldn't have hit headlines sooner if she had been making bikinis in the 1940s, especially given that "Sex Sells" and there is no way the press wouldn't have reported on anything so scandalous. I also looked up bikinis
2912:
It's been a week with no input from the removing editor(s) - two different IP addresses, but almost certainly the same person. I give fair warning that reversion without rationale and while discussion is ongoing is pretty much tantamount to disruptive editing, and I'll be going straight to ARV and
2138:
as an extension of the above - the rest of the article makes it very clear that the definition of "bikini" is broad, and that "full pelvic" coverage does not exclude a garment from being a bikini - indeed the very source that is being used here includes several pictures of high-waisted bikinis that
1935:
The distinction between swim briefs and "men's bikinis" seems to be quite arbitrary. Even the article content clearly states that it's a matter of using "bikini" as a synonym for briefs in certain contexts. The other aspect is all about the relatively few cases of men wearing full bikinis as a form
1765:
Now you are angry. By the way, I had figured out the context already. Though I didn't know that it had such a discussion. Anyways, even a "remove all images unclothed women" approach can not hold. Because, it had only diagrams, not really unclothed women. We can take this to the community, of which
1229:
Who cares if this is model, or if it was taken by a professional photographer? It certainly doesn't clash with any guidelines. If the image doesn't have visual attributes that are problematic, then delving into its background is pure trivia. It's a form of scrutiny that has no substantial relevance
885:
seems to be her too), photographed by a professional photographer, advertising a named bikini brand. The lifeboat image is of ordinary women, but because you kept removing it, I swapped it for an image of bikinis in a store window. The article is about an item of clothing, not about women's bodies.
289:
I am sure we can agree that accepted
Knowledge policies and guidelines are to be maintained. I am reverting back your good faith edit. Please, discuss and try to reach a consensus before you revert it back. I will be happy to involve other experienced editors with a good standing to reach consensus
2890:
The following projects have been remvoed by the same editor, and reinstated by me. Why should they be remvoed - they seem valid, and the only justification so far is an edit summary of "Bikinis are sometimes worn by preteens" which is utterly irrelevant to the topic. An obvious response is - why
842:
Peter, you keep removing a higher quality photograph for a lower quality one, claiming the latter is more neutral, which I think just means you prefer it. But the former is a perfectly valid image of bikinis; it's just not sexual in any way. And you're moving the New Jersey image into "Outside the
1489:
Removal of pubic hair itself is relevant to bikini designs, but individual styles are clearly not since they aren't visible other than if the crotch is actually bare. Clothing like this is specifically designed to... well... not display the genitals. Including detailed content about bare genitals
350:
BASF's bikini was a failed prototype. Day-Glo was not used. Sunblock factor was not variable. Sanctuary's polymer was not used for bikinis. 1991 invention was not cited in 1983 book. So, the final paragraph was almost entirely incorrect. Let's improve a Good
Article by leaving out the bogus info!
263:
2. Kellerman's one piece is another major event and a significant milestone in the evolution of the bikini from elaborate swimsuits, while the "Italian women" image and the Jane Wyman image have no particular historical significance. They are two of many images that can represent this part of the
1660:
I'm sympathetic to what PI is trying to do but I think that his perspective on the reason for pubic hair removal seems to be ideological and not based on sources. One could point out that men typically wouldn't want their pubic hair to be visible either. I think you should go with common sense,
233:
1. The history section is supposed to have "purely historic stuff", and not "current attitudes", especially if the information representing current attitudes is quite trivial. A major archaeological breakthrough is not trivial, a college banning a jelly wrestling is. If the something is "not of
203:
article. It has no relevance to the modern bikini, other than perhaps as trivia. (2) The "Continued controversies" section that was deleted relates to the current attitudes to and views of the bikini or to the most recent controversies. They are not of historic interest, but raise contemporary
1418:
The issue of women's pubic hair removal is not even specifically tied to just bikinis, but any similarly designed swimsuit bottoms and underwear in general. It's not much more relevant here than in any article on women's garments. It's pretty much the equivalent of expounding on topics like
818:
Not gonna change it without consensus, but is that lead image REALLY the best lead image? You can barely see the bikini in it, it's so tiny. It seems to be more the sort of picture that a sex-starved drooling teenage boy would choose for personal pleasure, than a serious encyclopaedic image.
1675:
Not sure how ideology comes in here. This is an article about clothing, not genitals. There isn't any connection made between, for example, various styles of bikinis and completely hairless crotches. And this has nothing to with the fact that it's a garment worn primarily by women. Similar
395:
My claims come directly from your citations. I think you misunderstood the descriptions in the sources. If you take a more careful look, you'll see what I mean. (Then if any of my specific edits are still puzzling you, just let me know here in detail and I'll clarify the science further if
441:
The Telegraph article said the fabric's commercial use was for "solar resistant trousers and shirts ... for hikers and trekkers." In 2003 the company had just "prototypes of swimsuits and bikinis," and in 2015 there's still no sign of these becoming commercial products. Think about it: A
910:
to be more "ordinary" in this case. Having a lead image without an actual person wearing a bikini is a perfectly valid option, but I don't see why the fairly crappy store window photo is a good alternative. Multiple images or a collage seems like it would be a better
1629:
Shall we seek outside opinion then? PI seem to be coming a bit too strong here, while F22R and I are looking very much like subversive associates. Also there is a clear divide, where both parties unwilling to shift positions. Surely a case for outside opinions.
1347:"mainstream and/or academic sources" is absurd. Most of the sources have been used to cobble trivia and random facts together. The most egregious misuse of sources is to establish notability through dictionary definitions and academic works on linguistics like
1996:, which I reverted, is not an improvement since "Use by men" is vague considering that the lead currently states nothing about what this "use" is. It's not men using women's bikinis; it's men wearing swimwear that may be referred to as a bikini or a
1781:, I came here from a link you provided, in a discussion you started, in a forum meant to draw community attention to an issue. I have told you I regret the ideological bickering, but if it spreads here, I don't think it's reasonable of you to blame
1490:
here does not make any sense. Readers who wish to read detailed information about pubic hair removal are not going to look for it in an article about a garment. And they are definitely going to look here for illustrations of female genitalia.
905:
You have to look pretty damned hard to actually find that named brand, btw, or that it was taken by a professional photographer. I'm focusing on the image itself, btw, not its meta-context. I'm not sure why you consider participants in the
1844:
may also be referred to as a bikini." The "Bikini underwear" section discusses men's wear in addition to women's wear, and there is a Men's bikini section right after that. So to not state anything about men's wear in the lead seems off.
1992:, which clearly states, "a : a woman's scanty two-piece bathing suit b : a man's brief swimsuit as applied to men," which we indeed do, then there should be something mentioned about it in the lead. And the lead was quite fine that way.
89:
The bikini tan section was removed, and I restored it. The bikini tan is valid, common and established concept. I see no reason for its removal. If anyone finds a reason, please, discuss. If that reason is valid, it may be removed again.
1349:
2000:. Either way, I am not going to fight over this. I made a note on what I believe to be the better lead, and I was clear that it's not solely a matter of the male bikini thing. If other editors are fine with the current lead, so be it.
1920:
can also refer to certain men's swimwear should be re-added since this is covered lower in the article (in the "Bikini underwear" and "Men's bikini" sections); the lead currently makes the bikini a woman-only matter when it isn't.
103:
to be in the article. Remember, this article is always in danger of becoming a picture album instead of an encyclopedia entry. If needed I can always get more neutral editors of high repute involved in the decision making process.
3096:
There is already an image captioned "A woman wearing a purple bikini at the beach" near the top of the article. What benefit does adding a similar image captioned "American fitness model Jennifer Nicole Lee in red bikini" have?
559:
The tarp discussion is irrelevant. You have already managed to prove your point on the Sanctuary prototype. My question is about the BASF prototype. Do you have any support for your claim that it still is not out in the market?
1825:, I don't think the slimmed down version is a better lead. This is a big article, and the former lead summarized the most important aspects well. Furthermore, as has been a matter of dispute at this article before (see
1799:
I did no such thing. I have discussed article content issues here and I tried to do so at GGTF. You are the one who brought up the issue of ideology at GGTF and now you're trying to do the same thing here.
521:
As far as I've seen, even in 2015, commercial tan-through swimwear all seems to be based on the 1969 "micro pore" innovation. (I certainly don't know anybody who wants to swim wearing a plastic tarp!) —
1353:. Just about everything is a hodge-podge of articles from newspapers, tabloids or gossip magazines. The research here seems to have been limited to googling "bikini" and using whatever has popped up.
1303:
I don't think you can underplay tankinis and monokinis in a section about bikini variants. Too much of that decisions comes from "eye candy" and not enough from mainstream and/or academic sources.
365:
Also: The 2009 product was a trivial variation of the 1969 innovation. UVC radiation doesn't reach the earth's surface. 1993–2008 medical references are superseded by 2011–2015. Hope this helps. —
2391:
declared the design sinful." part from the lead because, as noted in the aforementioned linked discussion, the tag was added because of that part...not because the lead had been drastically cut.
1497:
about bikinis (rhe title is "Vagina dialogue" for crying out loud) and the second only mentions waxing once in passing. You're the one insisting that it should be expanded on here, not the refs.
1737:
I've been editing this and other clothing-related articles long before you got whiff of it. You seem to be commenting here with the intent to spread the GGTF-related ideological bickering here.
1641:
That we currently have a section called "Bikini waxing" doesn't mean the article is improved by a lengthy summary of that article. The issue of pubic hair removal is one of several forms of
172:
I also have made use of horizontal images only for a synergistic layout. Unless they fail to illustrate the variants adequately, I don't think they need to be replaced with vertical images.
2135:
a reference isn't required for the lede, as it's a summary of the article proper and anything that exists in the lede must by definition be clarified and sourced in the rest of the article.
380:
The article have them adequately cited and sourced. Do you have any source that supports your claims? If not, then the information shouldn't be removed without another valid argument.
1411:
in this article is highly questionable. A brief mention of the phenomenon may be warranted, but extensive information, along with illustrations of actual pubic hair styles is clearly
3132:
Australian Paula Stafford designed and released the bikini in 1943 at the Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. This is 3 years before Jacques Heim released his design in France. See
2088:
you added, what parts of the lead contain information that is not included elsewhere in the article? Or did you rather mean to add a tag requesting that the lead be expanded?
1837:
was there in the lead sentence, and a hidden note that I created stated the following: NOTE: The term "usually" is used because "bikini" can also refer to a man's swimsuit."
442:
sun-protective bikini would create more-extreme tan lines, which is the exact opposite of what most people want, so it's unlikely this would ever become a commercial success.
286:. Clearly, if another good quality image can deliver the same information, you need to choose against the image that can offend. Titillation is not an encyclopedic approach.
264:
evolution or that, and as such they belong to the commons with a little box leading to further images (shown at right). We need to avoid over-use of images as prescribed by
3196:
2431:
2773:
3147:
It's kind of a problem that there seem to be no photos or documentation of these pieces prior to the 1950s, and at least one museum says she introduced it in 1952
1645:
related to this particular garment. That's the only reason why it's relevant here. These issues should be described together rather than as separate sub-topics in
716:
2805:
2801:
2787:
2641:
2637:
2623:
2521:
2517:
2503:
2283:
2279:
2265:
762:
758:
744:
3170:
What about the postcard that inspired Arthur Kniebler to create men’s briefs in 1935? It featured a French man in a bikini brief style bathing suit, supposedly
918:
in the article. I'm thinking in particular of the salacious gallery under "Major variants" with its photos of utterly obscure and borderline irrelevant "-kinis".
460:
that reports it succeeding, then we can put the info into the article; but on Knowledge we're supposed to avoid speculating about hypothetical future products. —
1024:
I preferred the long-standing lead image as well. Like SlimVirgin, I'm female, but I saw nothing objectifying about its inclusion. That stated, I am fine with
2952:
and other social media sites and saw a lot social media snaps/videos of various women riding skateboards in their bikinis. Considering that we have mentioned
1912:, the lead needs to adequately summarize the article; right now, I think it's somewhat lacking in that regard. Look at the size of this article. Look at what
268:, and therefore we can't start incorporating randomly picked images from a long line of images to represent every point in the evolution of a certain garment.
2103:
Sorry, I hadn't seen this discussion until now. But I added it in particular because of the phrase "The Vatican declared it sinful." While the body mentions
864:
as sexualized or objectifying, it shows activity and the person in the image seems to actually be someone who isn't 100% white (which is the norm otherwise).
2747:
1356:
One or two additional images of more common variants of bikinis seems perfectly fine, but the information that was attached to the gallery was sub-par. I'm
141:
I made a few changes. I restored the "In antiquity" section removed without an explanation. I also re-shifted the "Continued controversies" section to the
2467:
2387:), I restored the previous lead. If someone wants to change the definition back to what it was before I restored the lead, feel free. I removed the "The
2447:
2767:
929:
How about moving the historical photo of the first modern bikini to the lead? It's probably the most definitive picture of the item in the article. --
610:
article, which seems to be the appropriate place for such prototypes. I also added an archival ref for a 1969 deadlink about tan-through swimwear. —
1916:
states. I think a little more of the history and controversy aspect should be re-added. And I've already noted I think that the fact that the term
1608:
A section on bikini waxing clearly belongs in an article titled "Bikini." As for how much should be in the section, the section should comply with
2457:
2757:
2211:
1936:
of cross-dressing, primarily for entertainment purposes. In my view, this info belongs under a heading related to gender roles, not simply "men".
3048:
2897:
I'll not be reverting again in order to avoid editwarring, but I see no reason for the removal so far. Repeated removal would be disruptive.
1720:
1556:
There's no indication that pubic hair styles or naked female genitals are directly relevant to this topic. It's as irrelevant as expounding on
1379:
2741:
2727:
3016:
There are around 43 images in this article at the moment. I think it can be just as well represented with less. Do others have an opinion?
2599:
1450:
696:
599:
A quick google search ("titanium dioxide" bikini) turns up nothing since the 2003 prototype, and my previous observation is confirmed by
2998:
2974:
2231:
706:
1108:
account, it's her. Lighting and hairstyle really make all the difference; can really make a person look different from photo to photo.
1661:
consensus in light of F22's opinion, and the sources, and include a summary style section on waxing, perhaps without illustrations. --
196:
3197:
https://www.9news.com.au/national/australias-inventor-of-the-bikini-paula-stafford-dies-aged-102/fb261d90-958b-4a38-a809-3406ac1aabeb
2783:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2619:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2499:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2432:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151005073022/http://www.articlearchives.com/humanities-social-science/language-languages/644034-1.html
2774:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131225003346/http://www.essortment.com/different-types-bikini-wax-application-techniques-59434.html
1382:. Otherwise your argument in the four discussions above does not seem to hold against Knowledge policies, traditions and spirit.
2221:
1445:", Starts at 60.com), their stylistic variations resulted from bikini styles (Jennifer Keishin Armstrong, Heather Wood Rudúlph,
717:
https://web.archive.org/20120518004703/http://www.articles-central.info/Art/22681/48/Short-History-of-Bikinis-and-Swimsuits.html
2609:
2477:
2435:
720:
676:
234:
historic interest", it doesn't belong in the history section here, especially because this mother article must carry only a
119:"conservative" bikini style (ie with the navel covered) which persisted even after the briefer "bikini" came on the market.
2341:
How is this still classified as a good article if there is a notice on top regarding the lead section needing improvement?
2489:
1147:
I'm still skeptical that the two images SlimVirgin provided above are of the same person in the long-standing lead image.
961:. An odd choice if your aim is to focus on clothing and stop focusing on bodies. I agree about the gallery. It should go.
2777:
1988:
If we have sections in the article noting that types of men's swimwear may be considered a bikini, based on sources like
271:
3. This not an article about the navel or navel exposure, though the navel plays some part in the history of the bikini.
2876:
2848:
2748:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100108023628/http://www.bikiniscience.com/costumes/soutien-gorge_SS/topless_S/topless.html
2684:
2564:
2326:
1852:
added a lot to the article, but it's a topic that covers a lot, and Aditya Kabir did a nice job bringing the article to
329:
And I just removed this, along with the detailed descriptions of waxing and shaving. The article is about clothing, not
242:
article. That is the way Knowledge works. Slanting a subject with a long history towards minor recent events is called
2468:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131005005700/http://bikiniscience.com/costumes/bikiniology_SS/materials_S/materials.html
2131:
I've reverted the edit back to the more simplistic definition. I've also removed the reference for several reasons:
957:
Peter, she is a model being photographed by a professional photographer to sell bikinis. She is posing. Another one
2448:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070927084552/http://www.bikiniscience.com/chronology/1945-1950_SS/LR4601_S/LR4601.html
3044:
2768:
http://www.theage.com.au/cgi-bin/common/popupPrintArticle.pl?path=%2Farticles%2F2004%2F06%2F28%2F1088392608125.html
914:
I might be off here, but the previous lead image doesn't exactly scream "bikni model", especially when compared to
686:
38:
3034:
I see a few too many images here. And by a few too many, I mean the amount of images should probably be halved. –
1826:
3291:
But the article has monokini, tnakini and men's bikini. These are also not what I think of as bikinis, either.
2804:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2751:
2640:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2520:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2282:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1531:
about vaginas. The second one has three pages of discourse, not a passing mention. But, that's beside the point.
761:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2458:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131013211809/http://www.bikiniscience.com//chronology/1950-1955_SS/1950-1955.html
2396:
2368:
2172:
2093:
2069:
2005:
1926:
1861:
1617:
1274:
1196:
1152:
1113:
1073:
1037:
2758:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080907051823/http://www.articledashboard.com/Article/History-of-Swimsuits/461234
2471:
2212:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081223110444/http://www.worldheritagesite.org:80/sites/villaromanadelcasale.html
2111:, it doesn't discuss any kind of blanket statement being made by the Vatican about the sinfulness of bikinis.
1188:
1184:
3277:
is as far from a bikini as it is possible to get. It has its own article and it should not be included here.
3002:
1679:
I hate to be blunt here, but both you and Aditya seem inappropriately preoccupied with women's bare crotches.
3225:
2969:
2925:
2902:
2872:
2839:
2711:
2675:
2591:
2555:
2451:
2423:
2363:. I'm going to go ahead and restore that lead, which is what I was about to do before reading your comment.
2317:
2203:
2148:
1953:. While it is importantr enough to be in to article, it is probably not important enough to be in the lead.
1609:
1538:
2742:
http://photos.newhavenregister.com/2013/07/05/photos-on-this-day-july-5-1946-the-first-bikini-goes-on-sale/
2728:
http://photos.newhavenregister.com/2013/07/05/photos-on-this-day-july-5-1946-the-first-bikini-goes-on-sale/
1949:
I also could not find anything that shows "men's bikini" to be an established concept. Looks rather like a
3024:
2707:
2600:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120627214541/http://bikiniscience.com/chronology/1945-1950_SS/1945-1950.html
2868:
2864:
823:
was far better - it's far more realistic and representative, and definitely less blatantly exploitative.
697:
https://web.archive.org/20100419043317/http://www.abc.net.au:80/news/olympics/sports/beach-volleyball.htm
3063:
3035:
2823:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2811:
2659:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2647:
2539:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2527:
2301:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2289:
1690:
I really am not. I only came here because of the discussion on GGTF which I regret being involved in. --
1642:
800:
780:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
768:
726:
239:
200:
142:
69:
64:
59:
3221:
2710:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2603:
2590:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2422:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2202:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
3059:
2761:
2461:
600:
3137:
2989:
If I read reference 8 (Agrawala, P.K. (1983)) correctly, Mellaart is actually talking about the site
2256:
2232:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150317192943/http://www.thesurfchannel.com/slide/top-10-summer-bikinis/
707:
https://web.archive.org/20071228044658/http://www.news.com.au:80/story/0,23599,22339200-23109,00.html
2483:
1786:
1724:
1691:
1662:
1415:. Pubic hair removal is about specific ideals related to women's bodies which is a separate topic.
1350:
Studies in Etymology and Etiology (With Emphasis on Germanic, Jewish, Romance, and Slavic Languages)
1269:
And I never stated that I care. I commented on it because it was already mentioned in this section.
2441:
2392:
2364:
2215:
2168:
2089:
2065:
2001:
1922:
1857:
1790:
1728:
1695:
1666:
1613:
1270:
1192:
1148:
1109:
1069:
1033:
282:
4. Ironically, if you are looking for "some agenda behind the choice" of the monokini image, check
243:
2994:
1441:
Popularity of bikini waxing comes from popularity of bikinis (Dr. Ruth Nemzoff and Ellen Offner, "
700:
3296:
3263:
3244:
3212:
3175:
2961:
2921:
2916:
If you have a valid and sensible reason for your dissent by all means make it here, but remember
2898:
2894:{{WikiProject Nudity|class=GA|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Sexuality|class=GA|importance=mid}}
2735:
2721:
2144:
2116:
1939:
1802:
1778:
1740:
1707:
1704:
Yeah, well you're not doing anyone any favors by spreading the ideological issue to article talk.
1682:
1652:
1646:
1585:
1563:
1534:
1500:
1430:
1371:
1359:
1233:
996:
921:
869:
336:
2808:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2644:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2524:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2286:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1230:
to article content based on an unreasonable bias against a certain category of content creators.
765:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2824:
2660:
2540:
2302:
781:
418:
The source doesn't say the BASF prototype was a failure. Or may be I can't find where it does.
199:
for the following reasons. (1) The Antiquity material is purely historic and is already in the
3102:
3020:
2346:
2108:
2046:
1954:
1909:
1891:
1849:
1767:
1631:
1572:
1546:
1471:
1383:
1375:
1318:
1304:
958:
710:
658:
561:
491:
419:
381:
318:
291:
272:
235:
173:
150:
146:
104:
91:
2867:
on Wikimedia Commons has been nominated for speedy deletion. View the deletion reason at the
2235:
2222:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140522065802/http://www.object.org.uk/campaigns/beauty-pageants
3310:
3282:
3160:
3117:
3077:
2035:
1950:
1557:
934:
828:
796:
615:
526:
465:
401:
370:
356:
209:
124:
2831:
2667:
2547:
2309:
788:
3133:
2610:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130818070455/http://boxerbriefs.com/history_of_underwear.htm
2027:
1876:
1818:
1537:
information, not remove information if possible. It is an encyclopedia and it needs to be
1458:
1449:, pages 19-20, and the bikini industry is a driver of the waxing industry (Hannah Betts, "
1412:
962:
887:
844:
666:
607:
276:
2478:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/beijing_olympics/story/0%2C%2C24130706-5014104%2C00.html
2436:
http://www.articlearchives.com/humanities-social-science/language-languages/644034-1.html
989:
but I don't see any usefulness in criticizing images like this based on the existence of
721:
http://www.articles-central.info/Art/22681/48/Short-History-of-Bikinis-and-Swimsuits.html
677:
https://web.archive.org/20150809191530/http://www.cnn.com/STYLE/9901/13/vollyball.bikini/
2945:
2920:
and that you don't get to keep your altered version while we discuss the merits of it.
1676:
information in an article about men's swimwear or underwear would be equally irrelevant.
1542:
1105:
606:
I kept the BASF prototype information (corrected) in the "High-tech bikinis" box of the
490:
It still isn't out in the market, aye? Good point. We sure it is not out in the market?
314:
2941:
2790:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2626:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2506:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2490:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140222195121/http://www.more.com/fashion-age-limit-survey
2268:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1913:
1378:. If you want we can work without the "eye candy", which seems to be your real concern
1183:
I struck through part of my above post because it seems I went to a different account.
747:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2830:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2778:
http://www.essortment.com/different-types-bikini-wax-application-techniques-59434.html
2666:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2613:
2546:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2308:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1451:
The bikini is 70 years old today - so why is it still one of the hardest items to buy?
787:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
279:, that includes images, captions and the see also section as well as the body of text.
3292:
3259:
3258:
Since this article strays pretty far and wide, I think the burquini should be added.
3240:
3171:
2917:
2225:
2112:
2104:
2081:
1408:
907:
680:
265:
3148:
3098:
2356:
2342:
1989:
1872:
1853:
330:
1336:
I'm sorry, but I actually looked through some of the sources used for the gallery.
882:
1068:
On a side note: SlimVirgin, those additional pictures don't look like her to me.
3306:
3278:
3156:
3113:
3073:
2797:
2633:
2513:
2275:
2031:
1841:
1442:
930:
854:
824:
754:
687:
https://web.archive.org/20080317105526/http://nbcsports.msnbc.com:80/id/5705620/
611:
522:
461:
397:
366:
352:
205:
120:
47:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
17:
2493:
1457:). Impact of the garment on society, body hair, culture etc. do not seem to be
2796:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2632:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2512:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2274:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1545:). If bikini styles are influencing waxing styles, then they need to be here.
1470:
Please, let's solve this by discussion, and not a petite guerre over reverts.
1420:
1191:
maybe looks like her. The others, where is she is wearing shades, confuse me.
753:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
283:
2752:
http://www.bikiniscience.com/costumes/soutien-gorge_SS/topless_S/topless.html
1424:
2472:
http://bikiniscience.com/costumes/bikiniology_SS/materials_S/materials.html
3314:
3300:
3286:
3267:
3248:
3229:
3179:
3164:
3141:
3121:
3106:
3081:
3067:
3053:
3028:
3006:
2979:
2929:
2906:
2880:
2853:
2689:
2569:
2400:
2372:
2350:
2331:
2176:
2152:
2120:
2097:
2073:
2051:
2039:
2009:
1959:
1942:
1930:
1896:
1881:
1865:
1805:
1794:
1772:
1743:
1732:
1710:
1699:
1685:
1670:
1655:
1636:
1621:
1588:
1577:
1566:
1551:
1503:
1476:
1433:
1388:
1362:
1323:
1309:
1278:
1236:
1200:
1156:
1117:
1077:
1041:
999:
967:
938:
924:
892:
872:
849:
832:
808:
619:
566:
530:
496:
469:
424:
405:
386:
374:
360:
339:
323:
296:
213:
178:
155:
128:
109:
96:
3274:
2452:
http://www.bikiniscience.com/chronology/1945-1950_SS/LR4601_S/LR4601.html
2388:
690:
663:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
275:
specifically prohibits undue emphasis of any part of a subject, and, by
2990:
2859:
A Commons file used in this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
1997:
1875:, please feel free to restore any text you think should have remained.
3211:
The present article states "In 1907, Australian swimmer and performer
3216:
2703:
2583:
2415:
2195:
1840:
It's also why the following was included later in the lead: "A man's
727:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1082764/3/
648:
2604:
http://www.bikiniscience.com//chronology/1945-1950_SS/1945-1950.html
2762:
http://www.articledashboard.com/Article/History-of-Swimsuits/461234
2462:
http://www.bikiniscience.com/chronology/1950-1955_SS/1950-1955.html
1145:
Nah, the flickr.com account has different images of women on it, so
853:
671:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
2484:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C23599%2C22339200-23109%2C00.html
1612:. It should be an adequate summary of the Bikini waxing article.
1560:
in articles about underwear or types of pants worn mostly by men.
2442:
http://www.worldheritagesite.org/sites/villaromanadelcasale.html
2216:
http://www.worldheritagesite.org/sites/villaromanadelcasale.html
701:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/olympics/sports/beach-volleyball.htm
25:
3151:
2241:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
732:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
711:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22339200-23109,00.html
3273:
I disagree. The name may be a play on "bikini", but the
2714:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2594:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2426:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2236:
http://www.thesurfchannel.com/slide/top-10-summer-bikinis/
2206:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1890:
The lead needs to be short. What do you want to add back?
1833:
can also refer to a man's swimsuit, which is why the word
1719:. It's also only fair to Aditya that he or she understand
1447:
Sexy Feminism: A Girl's Guide to Love, Success, and Style
290:
if you want. This is not an insurmountable disagreement.
2953:
2587:
2419:
2384:
2380:
2199:
2164:
2085:
2064:
for that information; that's why I mentioned it above.
2061:
1993:
1822:
1716:
1337:
1029:
1025:
820:
652:
647:
I have just added archive links to 6 external links on
238:
of the history. Further information should go into the
2957:
2030:
is generally considered a pretty reliable source. --
2800:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2636:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2614:
http://www.boxerbriefs.com/history_of_underwear.htm
2516:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2278:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1533:The point is that on Knowledge you are supposed to
1317:Do we get to discuss changes made to this section?
757:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
3019:Hmmmm...pictures make the article better so no...
2226:http://www.object.org.uk/campaigns/beauty-pageants
681:http://www.cnn.com/STYLE/9901/13/vollyball.bikini/
2361:Talk:Bikini/Archive 4#Recent cutting of the lead
1370:doesn't justify removal. Knowledge policy is to
2360:
3128:Australian invented bikini 3 years before 1946
2786:This message was posted before February 2018.
2622:This message was posted before February 2018.
2502:This message was posted before February 2018.
2264:This message was posted before February 2018.
1493:As for the sources, the first is specifically
743:This message was posted before February 2018.
3092:Number of images of "person wearing a bikini"
2985:James Mellaart on bikinis in ancient Anatolia
2891:does this justify removal from the projects?
2045:Looks good to me. Support enough, I believe.
1028:current lead image. I would have objected to
8:
2494:http://www.more.com/fashion-age-limit-survey
2702:I have just modified 4 external links on
2582:I have just modified 2 external links on
2414:I have just modified 8 external links on
2359:, because the lead was recently cut; see
2194:I have just modified 3 external links on
3305:All three of those have bikini bottoms.
3189:
2060:That's the source that was used in the
1032:as a poor representation of the topic.
2695:External links modified (January 2018)
691:http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/5705620/
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3058:I totally agree. Too many images. :|
2253:to let others know (documentation at
1571:Naked female genitals? Just curious.
814:Current lede image seems a bit sleazy
7:
1827:Talk:Bikini/Archive 2#Men's bikinis
195:I am restoring the changes made by
24:
2706:. Please take a moment to review
2586:. Please take a moment to review
2418:. Please take a moment to review
2198:. Please take a moment to review
651:. Please take a moment to review
1527:about waxing, and bikini waxing
29:
2936:Woman on skateboards in bikinis
2766:Corrected formatting/usage for
2482:Corrected formatting/usage for
2476:Corrected formatting/usage for
2440:Corrected formatting/usage for
2143:cover the pelvis in entirety.
3287:18:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
3268:18:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
3249:18:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
725:Attempted to fix sourcing for
297:16:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
214:06:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
179:05:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
156:04:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
3054:10:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
2869:Commons file description page
908:2013 Longport Lifeguard Races
340:00:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
3315:18:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
3301:17:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
3029:15:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
3007:15:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
2854:11:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
2332:05:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
2177:22:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
2153:10:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
1523:Unfortunately the first ref
324:11:34, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
3230:13:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
2121:00:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
2098:23:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
1806:06:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
1407:Detailed information about
991:completely different images
809:16:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
313:The Commons have some good
284:MOS:IMAGES#Offensive images
246:here, and is to be avoided.
129:21:37, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
3335:
3107:15:28, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
2817:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2699:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2653:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2579:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2533:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2411:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2401:23:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
2373:22:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
2351:01:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
2295:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2191:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2074:03:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
2052:03:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
2040:23:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
2010:23:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
1960:02:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
1943:10:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
1931:22:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
1814:Recent cutting of the lead
1795:13:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1773:10:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1744:07:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1733:17:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1711:17:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1700:17:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1686:17:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1671:17:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1656:06:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1637:03:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1622:23:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
1589:14:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
1578:12:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
1567:10:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
1552:02:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
1504:15:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
1477:12:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
1434:08:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
1389:11:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1363:17:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1324:03:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
1310:12:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
1279:23:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
1237:10:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
1201:22:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
1157:22:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
1118:22:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
1078:22:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
1042:22:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
774:(last update: 5 June 2024)
669:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
644:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
620:10:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
567:10:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
531:09:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
497:09:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
470:09:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
425:07:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
406:07:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
387:07:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
375:06:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
361:06:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
145:article, in accordance to
3207:Annette Kellermann arrest
3180:21:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
3165:11:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
3142:09:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
2690:06:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
2570:03:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1897:13:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
1882:07:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
1866:06:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
1000:21:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
968:19:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
939:18:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
925:17:37, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
893:17:05, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
873:16:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
850:22:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
833:00:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
601:an expert blog from 2012:
315:diagrams of waxing styles
230:Good points there. But...
110:15:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
97:10:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
3122:21:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
3082:21:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
3068:20:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
2980:03:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
2930:12:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
2907:19:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
2881:16:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
916:almost every other photo
2575:External links modified
2407:External links modified
2187:External links modified
821:the original lede image
640:External links modified
1339:Calling references to
881:The woman is a model (
859:
819:Personally, I thought
857:
240:History of the bikini
201:History of the bikini
143:History of the bikini
42:of past discussions.
2798:regular verification
2634:regular verification
2514:regular verification
2276:regular verification
1766:S39 is also a part.
1643:feminine body ideals
1187:looks like her. And
755:regular verification
740:to let others know.
655:. If necessary, add
3235:What about the men?
2788:After February 2018
2624:After February 2018
2504:After February 2018
2266:After February 2018
2245:parameter below to
2127:"Full Pelvic" - etc
2107:'s condemnation of
1994:This heading change
1341:The Daily Telegraph
858:Previous lead image
745:After February 2018
736:parameter below to
346:Edits to Bikini tan
3215:was arrested on a
3213:Annette Kellermann
2873:Community Tech bot
2842:InternetArchiveBot
2793:InternetArchiveBot
2678:InternetArchiveBot
2629:InternetArchiveBot
2558:InternetArchiveBot
2509:InternetArchiveBot
2320:InternetArchiveBot
2271:InternetArchiveBot
1403:Pubic hair removal
1146:
1030:the lifeguards one
860:
750:InternetArchiveBot
333:. Keep it focused.
3052:
2818:
2654:
2534:
2296:
1880:
1380:your real concern
1144:
966:
891:
848:
807:
775:
317:. Highly usable.
82:
81:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3326:
3199:
3194:
3042:
3040:
3038:AssumeGoodWraith
2967:
2964:
2852:
2843:
2816:
2815:
2794:
2739:
2725:
2688:
2679:
2652:
2651:
2630:
2568:
2559:
2532:
2531:
2510:
2330:
2321:
2294:
2293:
2272:
2260:
2049:
1957:
1894:
1879:
1770:
1634:
1610:WP:Summary style
1575:
1558:human penis size
1549:
1539:WP:COMPREHENSIVE
1474:
1386:
1321:
1307:
965:
890:
847:
843:Western world."
803:
802:Talk to my owner
798:
773:
772:
751:
670:
662:
564:
494:
422:
384:
321:
294:
176:
153:
107:
94:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3334:
3333:
3329:
3328:
3327:
3325:
3324:
3323:
3256:
3237:
3209:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3195:
3191:
3130:
3094:
3036:
3014:
3012:Too many images
2987:
2965:
2962:
2938:
2888:
2886:Project removal
2861:
2846:
2841:
2809:
2802:have permission
2792:
2733:
2719:
2712:this simple FaQ
2697:
2682:
2677:
2645:
2638:have permission
2628:
2592:this simple FaQ
2577:
2562:
2557:
2525:
2518:have permission
2508:
2424:this simple FaQ
2409:
2383:(followup edit
2339:
2324:
2319:
2287:
2280:have permission
2270:
2254:
2204:this simple FaQ
2189:
2165:obviously agree
2129:
2047:
2028:Merriam-Webster
1955:
1892:
1816:
1768:
1632:
1573:
1547:
1472:
1443:Vagina dialogue
1405:
1384:
1319:
1305:
1301:
1299:Bikini variants
840:
816:
806:
801:
766:
759:have permission
749:
664:
656:
642:
608:Bikini variants
562:
492:
420:
382:
348:
319:
311:
292:
174:
151:
105:
92:
87:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3332:
3330:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3319:
3318:
3317:
3255:
3252:
3236:
3233:
3208:
3205:
3201:
3200:
3188:
3187:
3183:
3168:
3167:
3129:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3093:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3013:
3010:
2986:
2983:
2976:(see my edits)
2940:I was viewing
2937:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2914:
2887:
2884:
2865:Tan lines .jpg
2860:
2857:
2836:
2835:
2828:
2781:
2780:
2772:Added archive
2770:
2764:
2756:Added archive
2754:
2746:Added archive
2744:
2730:
2696:
2693:
2672:
2671:
2664:
2617:
2616:
2608:Added archive
2606:
2598:Added archive
2576:
2573:
2552:
2551:
2544:
2497:
2496:
2488:Added archive
2486:
2480:
2474:
2466:Added archive
2464:
2456:Added archive
2454:
2446:Added archive
2444:
2438:
2430:Added archive
2408:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2393:Flyer22 Reborn
2376:
2375:
2365:Flyer22 Reborn
2338:
2335:
2314:
2313:
2306:
2239:
2238:
2230:Added archive
2228:
2220:Added archive
2218:
2210:Added archive
2188:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2169:Flyer22 Reborn
2156:
2155:
2136:
2128:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2109:Kiki Håkansson
2090:Flyer22 Reborn
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2066:Flyer22 Reborn
2055:
2054:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2002:Flyer22 Reborn
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1937:
1923:Flyer22 Reborn
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1885:
1884:
1858:Flyer22 Reborn
1842:brief swimsuit
1815:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1800:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1738:
1705:
1680:
1677:
1650:
1614:Flyer22 Reborn
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1583:
1561:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1498:
1491:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1404:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1357:
1354:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1300:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1271:Flyer22 Reborn
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1231:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1193:Flyer22 Reborn
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1149:Flyer22 Reborn
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1110:Flyer22 Reborn
1106:the flickr.com
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1070:Flyer22 Reborn
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1034:Flyer22 Reborn
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
994:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
919:
912:
898:
897:
896:
895:
876:
875:
866:
865:
839:
836:
815:
812:
799:
793:
792:
785:
730:
729:
723:
715:Added archive
713:
705:Added archive
703:
695:Added archive
693:
685:Added archive
683:
675:Added archive
641:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
604:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
411:
410:
409:
408:
390:
389:
347:
344:
343:
342:
334:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
287:
280:
269:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
231:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
134:
133:
132:
131:
113:
112:
86:
85:Recent changes
83:
80:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3331:
3316:
3312:
3308:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3298:
3294:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3272:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3265:
3261:
3253:
3251:
3250:
3246:
3242:
3234:
3232:
3231:
3227:
3223:
3218:
3214:
3206:
3198:
3193:
3190:
3186:
3182:
3181:
3177:
3173:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3153:
3149:
3146:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3127:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3091:
3083:
3079:
3075:
3071:
3070:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3050:
3046:
3041:
3039:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3030:
3026:
3022:
3017:
3011:
3009:
3008:
3004:
3000:
2999:37.138.65.238
2996:
2992:
2984:
2982:
2981:
2978:
2977:
2973:
2972:
2968:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2935:
2931:
2927:
2923:
2922:Chaheel Riens
2919:
2915:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2904:
2900:
2899:Chaheel Riens
2895:
2892:
2885:
2883:
2882:
2878:
2874:
2870:
2866:
2858:
2856:
2855:
2850:
2845:
2844:
2833:
2829:
2826:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2813:
2807:
2803:
2799:
2795:
2789:
2784:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2769:
2765:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2743:
2737:
2731:
2729:
2723:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2700:
2694:
2692:
2691:
2686:
2681:
2680:
2669:
2665:
2662:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2649:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2580:
2574:
2572:
2571:
2566:
2561:
2560:
2549:
2545:
2542:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2529:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2505:
2500:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2485:
2481:
2479:
2475:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2443:
2439:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2412:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2377:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2337:Good article?
2336:
2334:
2333:
2328:
2323:
2322:
2311:
2307:
2304:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2291:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2267:
2262:
2258:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2192:
2186:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2145:Chaheel Riens
2142:
2137:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2105:Pope Pius XII
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:previous lead
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1961:
1958:
1952:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1898:
1895:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1883:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1846:
1843:
1838:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1813:
1807:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1771:
1745:
1742:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1678:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1635:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1590:
1587:
1584:
1582:"Bare", then.
1581:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1550:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1530:
1526:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1505:
1502:
1499:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1478:
1475:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1460:
1456:
1455:The Telegraph
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1432:
1428:
1426:
1422:
1416:
1414:
1410:
1409:bikini waxing
1402:
1390:
1387:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1325:
1322:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1308:
1298:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1238:
1235:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1104:But going by
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1001:
998:
995:
992:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
969:
964:
960:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
940:
936:
932:
928:
927:
926:
923:
920:
917:
913:
909:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
894:
889:
884:
880:
879:
878:
877:
874:
871:
868:
867:
862:
861:
856:
852:
851:
846:
837:
835:
834:
830:
826:
822:
813:
811:
810:
804:
797:
790:
786:
783:
779:
778:
777:
770:
764:
760:
756:
752:
746:
741:
739:
735:
728:
724:
722:
718:
714:
712:
708:
704:
702:
698:
694:
692:
688:
684:
682:
678:
674:
673:
672:
668:
660:
654:
650:
645:
639:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
602:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
568:
565:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
498:
495:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
471:
467:
463:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
426:
423:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
407:
403:
399:
396:necessary.) —
394:
393:
392:
391:
388:
385:
379:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
363:
362:
358:
354:
345:
341:
338:
335:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
316:
308:
298:
295:
288:
285:
281:
278:
274:
270:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
245:
241:
237:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
215:
211:
207:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
180:
177:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
157:
154:
148:
144:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
130:
126:
122:
117:
116:
115:
114:
111:
108:
101:
100:
99:
98:
95:
84:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3257:
3238:
3222:Stephen Wilk
3210:
3192:
3184:
3169:
3131:
3095:
3037:
3021:Elmortisproe
3018:
3015:
2988:
2975:
2971:(talk to me)
2970:
2946:Shutterstock
2939:
2913:RPP with it.
2896:
2893:
2889:
2862:
2840:
2837:
2812:source check
2791:
2785:
2782:
2701:
2698:
2676:
2673:
2648:source check
2627:
2621:
2618:
2581:
2578:
2556:
2553:
2528:source check
2507:
2501:
2498:
2413:
2410:
2379:A seen with
2340:
2318:
2315:
2290:source check
2269:
2263:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2240:
2193:
2190:
2140:
2130:
2084:, regarding
2080:
2026:
1917:
1850:Aditya Kabir
1847:
1839:
1834:
1830:
1829:), the term
1821:, regarding
1817:
1782:
1764:
1607:
1528:
1524:
1522:
1494:
1454:
1446:
1429:
1417:
1406:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1302:
1185:This picture
990:
915:
841:
817:
794:
769:source check
748:
742:
737:
733:
731:
646:
643:
364:
349:
331:hair removal
312:
244:WP:RECENTISM
88:
75:
43:
37:
3060:MemeMan2022
2257:Sourcecheck
1721:the context
1647:WP:COATRACK
1541:(see also:
1535:WP:PRESERVE
1372:WP:PRESERVE
309:Suggestions
36:This is an
18:Talk:Bikini
3185:References
3134:Ptilinopus
2995:Çatalhöyük
2963:Eurovision
2849:Report bug
2685:Report bug
2565:Report bug
2327:Report bug
1819:SlimVirgin
1421:whale tail
1376:WP:IMPROVE
838:Lifeguards
273:WP:BALASPS
236:WP:SUMMARY
206:Enthusiast
147:WP:SUMMARY
121:Enthusiast
3112:Removed.
2942:Pinterest
2863:The file
2832:this tool
2825:this tool
2736:dead link
2722:dead link
2668:this tool
2661:this tool
2548:this tool
2541:this tool
2381:this edit
2310:this tool
2303:this tool
1951:WP:FRINGE
1787:Sammy1339
1725:Sammy1339
1692:Sammy1339
1663:Sammy1339
1425:camel toe
911:solution.
795:Cheers. —
789:this tool
782:this tool
76:Archive 4
70:Archive 3
65:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
3293:Kdammers
3275:burquini
3260:Kdammers
3254:Burquini
3241:Kdammers
3172:Blu Moon
3072:Agreed.
3049:contribs
2838:Cheers.—
2674:Cheers.—
2554:Cheers.—
2316:Cheers.—
2086:this tag
2082:Graham11
1990:this one
1856:status.
1649:fashion.
1459:WP:UNDUE
1413:WP:UNDUE
659:cbignore
277:WP:UNDUE
3099:Useight
2991:Hacilar
2954:surfing
2740:tag to
2726:tag to
2708:my edit
2588:my edit
2420:my edit
2389:Vatican
2357:Tinton5
2343:Tinton5
2243:checked
2200:my edit
1998:mankini
1914:WP:Lead
1877:SarahSV
1873:Flyer22
1835:usually
1461:at all.
963:SarahSV
888:SarahSV
845:SarahSV
805::Online
734:checked
653:my edit
39:archive
3307:Meters
3279:Meters
3217:Boston
3157:Mabalu
3114:Meters
3074:Meters
2993:, not
2958:bikini
2950:Google
2948:, and
2918:WP:BRD
2732:Added
2718:Added
2704:Bikini
2584:Bikini
2416:Bikini
2251:failed
2196:Bikini
2113:Graham
2048:Aditya
2032:GRuban
1956:Aditya
1918:bikini
1910:Aditya
1893:Aditya
1848:Sure,
1831:bikini
1769:Aditya
1717:really
1633:Aditya
1574:Aditya
1548:Aditya
1543:WP:FA?
1473:Aditya
1385:Aditya
1345:People
1320:Aditya
1306:Aditya
931:GRuban
825:Mabalu
667:nobots
649:Bikini
612:Patrug
563:Aditya
523:Patrug
493:Aditya
462:Patrug
421:Aditya
398:Patrug
383:Aditya
367:Patrug
353:Patrug
320:Aditya
293:Aditya
266:WP:IDD
197:Aditya
175:Aditya
152:Aditya
106:Aditya
93:Aditya
3152:Trove
2956:in a
1940:Peter
1854:WP:GA
1803:Peter
1779:Peter
1741:Peter
1715:Yes,
1708:Peter
1683:Peter
1653:Peter
1586:Peter
1564:Peter
1501:Peter
1431:Peter
1360:Peter
1234:Peter
997:Peter
922:Peter
870:Peter
337:Peter
16:<
3311:talk
3297:talk
3283:talk
3264:talk
3245:talk
3226:talk
3176:talk
3161:talk
3138:talk
3118:talk
3103:talk
3078:talk
3064:talk
3045:talk
3025:talk
3003:talk
2926:talk
2903:talk
2877:talk
2397:talk
2385:here
2369:talk
2347:talk
2247:true
2173:talk
2149:talk
2117:talk
2094:talk
2070:talk
2036:talk
2006:talk
1927:talk
1862:talk
1823:this
1791:talk
1785:. --
1729:talk
1723:. --
1696:talk
1667:talk
1618:talk
1374:and
1343:and
1275:talk
1197:talk
1189:this
1153:talk
1114:talk
1074:talk
1038:talk
1026:this
959:here
935:talk
883:this
829:talk
738:true
616:talk
527:talk
466:talk
402:talk
371:talk
357:talk
210:talk
125:talk
2966:Nim
2806:RfC
2776:to
2760:to
2750:to
2642:RfC
2612:to
2602:to
2522:RfC
2492:to
2470:to
2460:to
2450:to
2434:to
2284:RfC
2261:).
2249:or
2234:to
2224:to
2214:to
1871:Hi
1495:not
1423:or
763:RfC
719:to
709:to
699:to
689:to
679:to
3313:)
3299:)
3285:)
3266:)
3247:)
3228:)
3178:)
3163:)
3140:)
3120:)
3105:)
3080:)
3066:)
3047:|
3027:)
3005:)
2997:.
2944:,
2928:)
2905:)
2879:)
2871:.
2819:.
2814:}}
2810:{{
2738:}}
2734:{{
2724:}}
2720:{{
2655:.
2650:}}
2646:{{
2535:.
2530:}}
2526:{{
2399:)
2371:)
2349:)
2297:.
2292:}}
2288:{{
2259:}}
2255:{{
2175:)
2167:.
2163:I
2151:)
2141:do
2119:)
2096:)
2072:)
2038:)
2008:)
1929:)
1864:)
1793:)
1783:me
1731:)
1698:)
1669:)
1620:)
1529:is
1525:is
1453:,
1427:.
1277:)
1199:)
1155:)
1116:)
1076:)
1040:)
937:)
831:)
776:.
771:}}
767:{{
665:{{
661:}}
657:{{
618:)
529:)
468:)
404:)
373:)
359:)
212:)
127:)
3309:(
3295:(
3281:(
3262:(
3243:(
3224:(
3174:(
3159:(
3136:(
3116:(
3101:(
3076:(
3062:(
3051:)
3043:(
3023:(
3001:(
2924:(
2901:(
2875:(
2851:)
2847:(
2834:.
2827:.
2687:)
2683:(
2670:.
2663:.
2567:)
2563:(
2550:.
2543:.
2395:(
2367:(
2345:(
2329:)
2325:(
2312:.
2305:.
2171:(
2147:(
2115:(
2092:(
2068:(
2034:(
2004:(
1925:(
1860:(
1789:(
1727:(
1694:(
1665:(
1616:(
1273:(
1195:(
1151:(
1112:(
1072:(
1036:(
993:.
933:(
827:(
791:.
784:.
614:(
525:(
464:(
400:(
369:(
355:(
351:—
208:(
123:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.