Knowledge

Talk:Bilinear time–frequency distribution

Source 📝

179: 267:
another time and definitely, the new title is more appropriate and a more elegant way to present the material. In addition, I have found exactly where this article should be inserted: it is related to a section of 2 other articles with the following titles: 1) time-frequency representation and 2) time-frequency analysis; I currently do not have the skills to do this and I do not know if I am authorized to do it; I am however one of the recognized pioneers of this field and this is definitely what needs to be done.
158: 84: 74: 53: 22: 284:
Ok I have renamed it. I chose "bilinear" as the form looks more blinear than quadratic. There are standards in Knowledge, whereby capital letters are avoided except for people or place names, or things derived from these. This has affected the new title, and I have also repaced (most of) these in the
266:
Answer: yes; I believe that this article should be renamed: "Quadratic Time-Frequency Distributions" (or "Bilinear Time-Frequency Distributions"), as it is a more acceptable terminology; I did not want to do it myself as I was not sure about the rules and whether I have access. I have reviewed it
251:
This comment was just added to the article: "The terminology currently used to refer to these methods is "Quadratic Time-Frequency Distributions" (or "Bilinear Time-Frequency Distributions"), and it is inappropriate to refer to them as simply Coher's class, as this class is too restrictive for the
252:
purpose of Time-Frequency Analysis." Does this mean that the article (as it stands) needs to be renamed, or should there be a new one with the present version of this reduced? In any case it is not good to leave comments like this in the article, and rather better to do something about it.
289:. I see from your user page that there have been complaints about your adding references to your own works. I think it would help if you could adopt the approach of adding inline citations as this will make it clear where and how these references are useful. See 350:
in the page, since this is where one ends up when searching for Cohen's class? There's nothing in the content at the moment to actually say whether some or all or none of the topics discussed relate to Cohen's class. Thanks.
370:
Cohen's class. Of course, the article is hopelessly unfocussed, discursive, and unsystematic; but, at the very least, one is steered on to Cohen's basically serviceable book to crawl out of the mess. Also added wikilink to
372: 229: 379:
at the price of starting up yet another dangling stub. So, this really appears like the most natural home for Cohen's class summaries and discussions, the above misgivings nothwithstanding.
140: 375:, which should really be merged with this one, in an ideal world.... The physics side of these distributions would appreciate a brief Cohen class summary, but 418: 219: 408: 130: 403: 307:
ok; I will take care of this asap and finalize the editing to make further progress, and definitely I will add others references where appropriate.
423: 413: 106: 195: 286: 293:
for info on how to do this (and don't forget to add other people's work where appropriate). You might like to start with this article.
97: 58: 186: 163: 360: 323: 33: 285:
article. It is good to have some progress with this article, and you might like to also look at other articles in
388: 327: 302: 276: 261: 21: 384: 39: 83: 178: 157: 311: 315: 268: 194:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
319: 298: 272: 257: 89: 73: 52: 380: 346: 356: 290: 397: 294: 253: 102: 191: 79: 366:
Just did. The entire class of these distributions and their inter-relations
352: 373:
transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis
15: 344:
Can someone please write something explicitly about
190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 8: 19: 152: 47: 154: 49: 7: 184:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 419:Low-importance Statistics articles 14: 409:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 404:Start-Class mathematics articles 287:Category:Time–frequency analysis 204:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 177: 156: 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 424:WikiProject Statistics articles 414:Start-Class Statistics articles 224:This article has been rated as 207:Template:WikiProject Statistics 135:This article has been rated as 1: 198:and see a list of open tasks. 109:and see a list of open tasks. 339: 440: 389:17:32, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 361:17:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 328:09:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 223: 172: 134: 67: 46: 303:09:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC) 277:17:00, 7 July 2010 (UTC) 262:08:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC) 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 187:WikiProject Statistics 28:This article is rated 340:Cohen's class please 121:mathematics articles 210:Statistics articles 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 331: 314:comment added by 244: 243: 240: 239: 236: 235: 151: 150: 147: 146: 431: 330: 308: 230:importance scale 212: 211: 208: 205: 202: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 439: 438: 434: 433: 432: 430: 429: 428: 394: 393: 342: 309: 249: 209: 206: 203: 200: 199: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 437: 435: 427: 426: 421: 416: 411: 406: 396: 395: 392: 391: 341: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 248: 245: 242: 241: 238: 237: 234: 233: 226:Low-importance 222: 216: 215: 213: 196:the discussion 182: 170: 169: 167:Low‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 436: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 402: 401: 399: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 369: 365: 364: 363: 362: 358: 354: 349: 348: 347:Cohen's class 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 306: 305: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 274: 270: 264: 263: 259: 255: 246: 231: 227: 221: 218: 217: 214: 197: 193: 189: 188: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 381:Cuzkatzimhut 376: 367: 345: 343: 265: 250: 225: 185: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 310:—Preceding 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 398:Categories 201:Statistics 192:statistics 164:Statistics 324:contribs 316:Boashash 312:unsigned 295:Melcombe 269:Boashash 254:Melcombe 291:WP:CITE 247:Rename? 228:on the 139:on the 36:scale. 385:talk 357:talk 353:mcld 320:talk 299:talk 273:talk 258:talk 377:not 220:Low 131:Low 400:: 387:) 368:is 359:) 351:-- 326:) 322:• 301:) 275:) 260:) 383:( 355:( 318:( 297:( 271:( 256:( 232:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion
Low
importance scale
Melcombe
talk
08:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Boashash
talk
17:00, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Category:Time–frequency analysis
WP:CITE
Melcombe

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.