1616:
generally in pure mathematics. "Binomial expression" appears only in one article of
English Knowledge". I have done a quick search for "binomial expression" in Google Scholar. In the three first pages only appear articles in probability, statistic, physics and biology. Thus, an article "binomial expression" could exist, but this should be another article. Finally, if the article is called "binomial expression", it should begin, or at least contain "a binomial expression is a sum of two terms". I do not know any reference for that. Moreover, an article containing such a definition should contain an explanation of the reasons for which nobody uses the term "binomial expression" for Cardano's formula for the depressed cubic equation (which is a sum of two cubic roots). Similarly nobody says that that associativity of addition is an identity involving two binomial expressions. Thus naming this article "polynomial expression" would be both
1106:, "The fact that an article has a different title is not a factor in determining whether a topic is primary." It is also clearly untrue that the mathematics meaning is the only one that is used as a noun (although I don't think that necessarily matters so much). A specific example is shown in the discussion above, where a meaning identified as a noun meaning is given as "n. A taxonomic name used in ..." That noun meaning also corresponds to the medical definition in the above-discussed search results. The notion that expertise in mathematics is needed for this discussion is definitely incorrect, since the question is not just what "binomial" means in mathematics, but whether "binomial" has sufficiently notable meanings
95:
85:
64:
31:
22:
760:
confusing mess. I've looked at a few mathematical encyclopedias, all of which state that a binomial is a "polynomial with two terms." The more precise mathematical definition in the
Definition section makes it clear what a "term" looks like. I agree that this isn't the most precise use of the word "term" but it is the way "term" is commonly used when discussing polynomials.
1508:, indicating you don't think this is the primary topic, and then in your final argument you seem to be again saying that you think this article is the primary topic, but your evidence – that there are actually four very prominent maths terms readers could be looking for when searching for "binomial" – is actually a good argument for there not being a primary topic.
1114:(which was a mathematics article when those links were created) makes it obvious that a very large number of the links are erroneous links from biology, not correct former links from mathematics (and are also using the term as a noun, if that matters). Please note that I am fixing some of those, so they may be gone by the time the reader sees these remarks. —
1256:. The scientific name of organism is referred to as the binomial. Yes, the naming system is called "binomial nomenclature" and people sometimes talk about a "binomial name" (which is redundant and not generally preferred usage). But regardless of how the dab page is currently structured, it is very weird to say "the binomial nomenclature of coast redwood is
2395:, not another topic with the same name. I'm not fond of the merge idea, because I think that this article nicely collects the information that is distinctly about binomials. It's a rather succinct article, and it may never get a lot larger, but it seems well written and my impression is that its content might get muddled and scattered by a merge.
614:
2422:. In fact, it is too vague, and even ambiguous, as almost all occurrences of "binomial" occur in algebra. Therefore a reader may not know to what refers "(algebra)" without going to the article. That is, the disambiguating parenthesis does not disambiguates at all, and thus does not fill at all its purpose. Therefore, I
1503:
For the sake of avoiding the look of impropriety, I won't be closing this RM. So can I just say I think your comment here would be difficult to interpret for a closer, as your comment in the previous RM was? You say support, indicating you think this article is the primary topic, then say you support
1132:
Secondly, I agree that the discussion on what is the primary topic, if any, must involve not only mathematicians, but also people of other areas, where the term is used. However, it is not needed to be a specialist in any area, to remark that in the dab page the only occurrence of "monomial" alone is
1928:
Maybe all those people are looking for something else, and simply typed "binomial" into the search bar, because they didn't know what the word meant. Knowledge is not a dictionary; we don't need a separate article for every word or phrase. I think it would be more helpful to redirect readers of this
759:
Is it really advisable to make the definition of binomial dependent on an understanding of "monomial", rather than just using the more common "terms" in the first instance? Doing so throws the reader who wants to understand the meaning of binomial into the monomial article which, in my opinion, is a
1128:
It should be clear that moving a mathematical article requires the agreement of mathematicians. Otherwise, this may lead to non-sense titles, as it has been the case here. It is also clear that, for this reason and also because of the small number (3) of contributors of the discussion, the move of
1615:
I don't agree for several reasons: Firstly, in the article, "binomial" is a noun. Therefore it is confusing to use it as an adjective in the article title. Secondly, the phrase "binomial expression" does not appear in the article. Thirdly, "binomial expression" is rarely used in algebra, and more
1384:
I did say D.Lazard could open a new RM as soon as they wanted because the last one was sparsely attended and they were bringing new arguments to the table. I can understand if you disagree with that though, it's not usually done. I should have left a note here about it initially, so apologies for
1333:
the only use alone as a noun – most of those bad links that I fixed today were using it as a noun. Links to the former name should simply be fixed (as I have already gotten a good start on doing). As a procedural matter, the previous RM was just closed a few hours ago, and it had been open for 16
763:
Note that I'm not objecting to referencing the "terms" if binomial as monomial somewhere, but the definition of binomial that has recently been edited into article makes the definition fail to stand alone. The reader who doesn't know the meaning of binomial is unlikely to be helped much by being
2097:
disambiguation and to avoid the awkwardness and redundancy of the current title. Sorry for opening this question back up again, but I think this would be an improvement, and this is not the same title suggestion that was proposed last time. It is clear that there was no consensus in favor of the
1457:. What a mess! So if there is no consensus, we're stuck this title that no one likes? The current title is treats "polynomial" as a class. I assume the members of said class are monomials, binomials, trinomials, etc. This is an nonobvious way to look at the issue, especially if you compare it to
1014:
The result of the recent move it that the title of the new title does not appear in the text of the article. Moreover, this title is strongly confusing, as it suggest that a polynomial is an equation, which is blatantly wrong. As, in this article, "binomial" is not an adjective but a noun, this
908:
Using your search engine link, I see various topics on the first page of results that are not math: 1) three out of the five definitions displayed directly on the results page, 2) a
Dictionary.com link summarized as "adj. Consisting of two terms or names, such as the genus and species names of
1522:"Binomial," "binomial expression," or "binomial (expression)" are all fine with me. The consensus is shaping up against making this subject primary, which was also true in the last RM. So some form of disambiguation is necessary. I should note that this subject is simply "binomial" as far as
1470:
2471:. As none of the preceding proposed titles seems able to reach a consensus, one has to find something new. It is rather unusual to disambiguate a title by its etymology, but it this case, this perfectly plays its disambiguating role, by explicitly describing the content of the article.
1276:
refers to the concept in personal names. At least 13 of 50 incoming links are not about a mathematical concept (and those that are about a mathematical concept may intend a different concept than a two element polynomial). Keep the dab page at the base title so links get disambiguated.
2174:. It's repetitious to have -nomial twice. All binomials can be considered polynomials, at least in the sense that "bi-" (2) is logically a special case of "poly-." So the current title is not effectively disambiguating. As for the opening, that of course can be revised after the move.
937:
Yes. As I said above, if we can agree that some form of disambiguation is needed, we can work out what the title should be. The original proposed title is less ambiguous than the current title, but I agree that something even less ambiguous than that may be preferable. I notice that
1403:
No problem. Yes, it's true that the prior RM didn't have much participation. Incidentally, I have fixed about 15 more of those incoming links. Some of the remaining ones are hard to fix, because it's not clear to me what they were intending to link to. Some of them shouldn't link
1817:
1526:
are concerned -- and it is the only one these subjects that is true of. Logically, any binomial should be a type of polynomial. In statistics, they say "multinomial distribution" instead of "polynomial distribution." But how many readers are likely to be hip that skip?
1320:
obviously, per my remarks above. Regarding the incoming links described by
Plantdrew above, that doesn't count the 35 links that I already fixed today that were from biology articles that were previously accidentally linking to the mathematics topic. Mathematics is
2156:
The first sentence says "a binomial is a polynomial which is ...", and expressions that are not polynomials (or expressions whose terms are not monomials) are not considered in the article. Thus the proposed title does not correspond to the content of the article.
388:
1087:) remains the best title. I have asked to the administrator that has closed the move request to revert the two moves, and, possibly, to relist the move request, as, apparently, none of the few participants to the discussion is an expert in mathematics.
725:
1133:
the use in mathematics, with the meaning of polynomial of two terms. Maybe "monomial" alone (as noun) is used elsewhere, but this usage is rare enough to not be the subject of an article. This makes clear that the math meaning is a
2633:
Well, there's some nontrivial amount of content. Most of it isn't meticulously sourced, but it's there – and there's a general reference to a textbook – but I won't argue too forcefully to insist that it stays a separate article.
1355:: Please also note that this is a malformed multimove request. Because it was not submitted as a multiple page move, no notification has been placed on the Talk page of the other article that would be affected by this move. —
1101:
It is true that
Knowledge article titling convention prefers the use of noun titles, but that doesn't mean we should ignore non-noun terms completely or that disambiguation is only needed for noun meanings. As stated at
381:
2399:
fully solves the basic "awkwardness and redundancy" problem, which is what really motivated this proposal in the first place. Note also that the current title was not the outcome of an RM, and in fact was never even
1548:. I do agree with Professor Lazard's contention that the primary topic should be the polynomial, for the reasons he has stated. However, I also think it is very likely that editors of biology articles will link
1875:
into the search bar, I would think they would want the binomial distribution or binomial coefficients much more often than information about "polynomials with two terms". So I'd be in favour of keeping
1334:
days here on the Talk page of a mathematics article (and had been relisted). There was ample opportunity to participate in that discussion, and we shouldn't have to immediately repeat the process. —
1556:, regardless of the primary meaning. The project is clearly better served if these editors were notified by the bot that this is an ambiguous name, rather than for the error to pass silently.
609:{\displaystyle {\sqrt {1+x}}=(1+x)^{\frac {1}{2}}=1+{\frac {1}{2}}x+{\frac {{\frac {1}{2}}({\frac {1}{2}}-1)}{2!}}x^{2}+{\frac {{\frac {1}{2}}({\frac {1}{2}}-1)({\frac {1}{2}}-2)}{3!}}x^{3}...}
1867:, clearly, are worthy of their own article; but I don't see why polynomials with exactly two terms are noteworthy, or interesting. It seems unhelpful to split this content off from the main
151:
2749:
909:
organisms. n. A taxonomic name used in ...", and 3) a medical dictionary leading to a definition in the medical context. Also, the math results are not all for the same topic in math. —
1137:. In any case, the move implies the the mathematical meaning is not a primary topic, and this has not been discussed ("primary topic" has not even been mentioned in the discussion.
267:
1786:
is the mathematics article or the current disambiguation page. So that's not really an argument. The only difference is that a bot will notify editors of erroneous links if
1473:. As for primary topic, it should be based on what a reader who types in "binomial" is likely to be searching for, which we can gauge from search engine results. This topic,
1408:
to mathematics or the binomial nomenclature of biology, and some of them that are within mathematics seem like they might be referring to different topics in mathematics. —
2754:
2061:
The discussion was leaning towards a merge, but I'm not sure there was sufficient agreement on that, so I would suggest anyone in favour of that proposal start an RfC.
2739:
740:
Are something this article appears to lack completely, though it's a rather nicely written article. I suggest that this article be tagged for needing some citations.
620:
1015:
article must be called "Binomial" with or without a disambiguation such as "(mathematics)" or "(polynomial). Therefore, I have been bold and moved the page to
1226:. These moves amounts to revert two recent moves. Some of the reasons appear in the preceding section. In summary, the subject of the article is clearly the
971:
probably per
Humbert, and replace with the disambiguation page per nom. Thus multiple math topics listed at the disambiguation page will show what's what --
35:
2744:
2764:
141:
2759:
2734:
2112:" had general support in the previous move discussion. One bit of evidence that makes it clear to me that the mathematics meaning was misplaced as a
1790:
is a disambiguation page. And it seems like a reasonable idea to have the bot do this. In contrast, someone typing "binomial" (as opposed to
117:
275:
2048:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1179:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
796:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
729:
This can be used to compute square root provided x is small enough. However, for computing square root there are usually better methods.
2729:
189:
2648:
The content sourceable to a textbook is WP:NOTTEXTBOOK violating. There is a clear lack on commentary on the subject of binomials. --
888:. Everything that came up was math related. However, there is more than one math meaning. This article should be "binomial equation."
2566:
1699:
972:
108:
69:
2369:
and oppose a merge. We should be building an encyclopedia, not eliminating a term that is commonly listed in math reference works.
1764:
was a longstanding article about the mathematics topic, we had at least 50 accidental incoming links to it from biology articles. —
2192:
Of course not, unless if you have enough reliable sources asserting that a binomial is the same thing that a binomial expression.
2686:
1199:
2072:
2542:
is vague, the entire article is vague, because thee subject is nothing more than use of algebra to write two terms, as per
2441:
2392:
44:
2003:
No, since there was a consensus established against that title in the previous RM. I also think it is well agreed that
1380:
Just on your comment about the procedural matter of it being opened so quickly after the last RM, I should note that
2580:
is a more extensive essay, but more appropriate in an "Introduction to
Mathematics" than as an encyclopedia article.
1639:
1942:
1893:
1742:
It seems to me we've gone through a lot contortions when the initial title of "binomial" was a perfectly good one.
1140:
One other fact that has been in the discussion is the very high number of links that presently link to a dab page.
2701:
2507:
This is the worst idea yet. No, the disambiguator is not supposed to be an explanation of the title. Please read
2039:
1960:
1231:
1223:
1170:
1103:
1070:
990:
923:
Do you recognize that the fact that there is more than one math meaning is a disadvantage of the proposed title?
845:
787:
2493:
in the first place. That's a naming convention that uses two terms in a name ("a name composed of two parts"). —
1760:
Perhaps, if you're willing to ignore biological science. Personally, I think biology is rather important. When
21:
2601:
doesn't look like it needs an article. There seems to be almost nothing there about it. I'm less sure about
2268:
1677:
1227:
1073:
for clarifying that, as noun, "binomial" is unambiguous. As an article title should normally be a noun (see
1038:
833:
185:
1717:
2468:
2113:
2103:
1326:
1134:
769:
1230:, as it appears that, except for the subject of this article, "binomial" never occurs alone (as noun) in
1042:
2711:
2639:
2610:
2539:
2498:
2486:
2449:
2419:
2409:
2396:
2384:
2366:
2319:
2299:
2276:
2264:
2245:
2143:
2084:
2049:
2020:
2004:
1970:
1938:
1889:
1881:
1856:
1769:
1729:
1721:
1703:
1685:
1474:
1435:
1413:
1360:
1339:
1294:
1211:
1180:
1119:
1060:
1034:
1016:
1000:
976:
951:
914:
857:
837:
797:
745:
181:
50:
94:
1260:"; normal usage would be "the binomial of coast redwood...". There are currently 50 incoming links to
219:
2683:
2516:
2374:
2179:
1993:
1915:
1825:
1747:
1667:
1532:
1494:
1482:
1196:
928:
895:
177:
2653:
2624:
2588:
2254:
2067:
2012:
1586:
1505:
1466:
1427:
1306:
1298:
1282:
1081:
943:
870:
116:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2476:
2431:
2356:
2331:
2230:
2197:
2162:
1782:
The title was perfectly fine. Those links were errors. The biology links will be error whether
1625:
1243:
1145:
1092:
1024:
840:
of biology, which is a central element of biological science. Note, however, that there may be a
100:
84:
63:
2404:
in the prior two RM discussions, so it hardly represents any strong prior sense of consensus. —
889:
2307:
2094:
2008:
1804:
1599:
1566:
1513:
1458:
1390:
1381:
1273:
818:
810:
765:
1984:
If there is "no consensus," shouldn't the article revert to the last stable title, which was
2635:
2606:
2494:
2445:
2405:
2388:
2323:
2272:
2139:
2125:
2016:
1934:
1903:
1765:
1725:
1681:
1478:
1431:
1409:
1375:
1356:
1335:
1115:
1056:
947:
910:
853:
741:
720:{\displaystyle {\sqrt {(}}1+x)=1+{\frac {x}{2}}-{\frac {1}{8}}x^{2}+{\frac {1}{16}}x^{3}...}
2680:
2512:
2508:
2370:
2293:
2175:
1989:
1911:
1821:
1743:
1663:
1528:
1490:
1193:
1192:
It's clear that we won't find a consensus to change the title of this article at present.
1074:
924:
891:
2679:. A good case has been made above that the material can be better discussed together.--
2649:
2620:
2584:
2348:
2250:
2218:
2062:
1302:
1278:
1234:. This is also supported by the very high number of mathematical articles that link to
866:
841:
2391:
belongs to algebra, but no one would refer to it as simply "Binomial". It is merely a
1486:
2723:
2472:
2427:
2352:
2327:
2289:
2226:
2193:
2158:
1791:
1698:
There's a problem with that, as the disambiguation page lists several math topics --
1621:
1553:
1462:
1239:
1141:
1088:
1020:
2562:
2303:
2129:
1797:
1617:
1592:
1559:
1509:
1485:
are all far more likely desired search destinations than the biology meaning. (See
1386:
1269:
814:
209:
1642:, you'll see that there are plenty of textbook authors who don't see it that way.
844:
problem here since there are several other mathematics topics for "binomial" (see
2217:(this may explain the low number of views). Therefore, following a suggestion of
2124:, and with the disambiguated title it is now getting only about 7 views per day (
2691:
2657:
2643:
2628:
2614:
2592:
2520:
2502:
2480:
2453:
2444:, not things that people refer to as "Binomial" without further qualification. —
2435:
2413:
2378:
2360:
2335:
2311:
2280:
2258:
2234:
2201:
2183:
2166:
2147:
2077:
2024:
1997:
1946:
1919:
1897:
1829:
1811:
1773:
1751:
1733:
1707:
1689:
1671:
1629:
1606:
1573:
1536:
1517:
1498:
1439:
1417:
1394:
1364:
1343:
1329:
for the term "binomial" – as evidenced by all those incorrect links. It is also
1310:
1286:
1247:
1204:
1149:
1129:
the mathematical article previously called "Monomial" should not have been done.
1123:
1096:
1064:
1028:
980:
955:
932:
918:
899:
874:
822:
773:
749:
212:
193:
113:
2489:, the meaning in biology that was a big part of the reason this was moved from
2710:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
2676:
2531:
2344:
2222:
2214:
1969:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1930:
1885:
1868:
1860:
1716:
True. Forgot about that momentarily. I'm not a fan of partial disambiguation.
999:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
939:
90:
2552:
2221:
in the preceding move discussion, I am in favor of merging this article into
1523:
2598:
2573:
2543:
2535:
2121:
1907:
2602:
2577:
2490:
2138:" redirect). I now suggest merely improving the form of disambiguation. —
2117:
2099:
1985:
1877:
1864:
1787:
1783:
1761:
1549:
1261:
1235:
1219:
1215:
1111:
1052:
885:
829:
376:{\displaystyle (a+b)^{c}=\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }{c \choose j}a^{j}b^{c-j}}
1906:
that applies specifically to binomial expressions. Binomials get over
1658:("A binomial expression is one which has two terms"), and John Bird's
2242:. "Expression" is not prominent in the explanation and is awkward.
1880:
as the disambiguation page; and I'd also be in favour of redirecting
1859:
should exist. There is already a single sentence within the article
2213:
In fact, this article has almost no content that is not already in
1863:, which defines the word "binomial" in the sense of this article.
1265:
1268:
also links to binomial while discussing the concept in biology.
1264:; 9 of those are biological taxa, and one is a list of plants.
15:
1816:
How common is "binomial name" anyway? Not very, according to
383:. This works even if c is not a natural number. For example:
2557:
Everything below the introduction's definition is editorial
1794:) into the search bar should expect the mathematics topic.
2551:
The sole reference to the topic is a definition. Quoting
2116:
is that in
September when this article was called simply "
1654:("An algebraic expression consisting of only two terms"),
1646:("An algebraic expression consisting of only two terms"),
2106:, but my impression (as noted above) is that the title "
205:
we know (a+b)^n=.... what about (a+b)^c=??? with c: -->
2134:
2108:
2089:
1047:
2554:
in its entirety: "Binomial A polynomial with 2 terms."
1644:
The
Pearson Guide to Complete Mathematics for the AIEE
1110:
of mathematics. A quick look at the incoming links to
848:). Let's first see if there is general agreement that
2700:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2011:. Personally, I thought we were going to end up with
1959:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
989:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
623:
391:
278:
222:
2619:
Unsure? Count the instances of sourced content. --
1037:
seems good to me. I think it's probably better than
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2546:: Noun, #1 "(algebra) A polynomial with two terms."
2249:, agreeing it is desirable to avoid repetition. --
2052:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1183:. No further edits should be made to this section.
800:. No further edits should be made to this section.
2714:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1973:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1003:. No further edits should be made to this section.
719:
608:
375:
261:
2387:is my preference at this point as well. Yes, the
1910:views a month, so someone is interested in them.
1656:BTEC National Further Mathematics for Technicians
1589:seems like a better title than the current one.
836:– For disambiguation, especially relative to the
341:
328:
2098:previous suggestion of moving the page back to "
2750:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Mathematics
1662:(2014). Pure math is not equal to all of math.
1640:check gbooks for the term "binomial expression"
2530:any rename, instead merge anything unique to
8:
755:Definition relying on definition of monomial
2015:, but that doesn't seem to have happened. —
19:
2440:The other topics within algebra seem like
2326:, among others, also belongs to algebra).
2038:The following is a closed discussion of a
1169:The following is a closed discussion of a
786:The following is a closed discussion of a
58:
2755:Start-Class vital articles in Mathematics
2322:as too vague for helping disambiguation (
1855:. In fact, I'm not convinced the article
702:
688:
679:
665:
652:
624:
622:
591:
557:
535:
522:
519:
510:
476:
463:
460:
444:
424:
392:
390:
361:
351:
340:
327:
325:
319:
308:
295:
277:
253:
243:
230:
221:
2418:I have badly expressed my opposition to
1272:refers to the concept in folk taxonomy.
2740:Knowledge vital articles in Mathematics
60:
2298:Thoughts on SmokeyJoe's suggestion of
1648:Mathematics for Information Technology
7:
2057:The result of the move request was:
1188:The result of the move request was:
805:The result of the move request was:
732:salte 16:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
106:This article is within the scope of
2267:. Note that I previously suggested
813:, dab page moved to base location.
272:Not quite sure what you mean here.
49:It is of interest to the following
2745:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
332:
320:
14:
2765:Mid-priority mathematics articles
2567:teaching grandmother to suck eggs
2271:, which seems somewhat similar. —
2263:I wouldn't necessarily object to
262:{\displaystyle (x_{1}-x_{2})^{2}}
126:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
2760:Start-Class mathematics articles
2735:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1929:article somewhere else, such as
173:binomial distribution is great!
129:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
2534:. The only real content is at
860:) 23:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
146:This article has been rated as
2031:Requested move 18 January 2016
1162:Requested move 27 October 2015
1077:), "binomial" (with a hatnote
852:of disambiguation is needed. —
779:Requested move 11 October 2015
640:
626:
573:
554:
551:
532:
492:
473:
421:
408:
292:
279:
250:
223:
194:04:31, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
2347:, as previously suggested by
2078:20:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
1075:WP:TITLE#Article title format
946:lead to different articles. —
120:and see a list of open tasks.
2692:14:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
2658:00:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2644:00:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2629:23:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2615:23:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2593:23:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2572:The same opinion applies to
2521:14:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2503:22:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2481:18:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2454:22:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2436:18:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2414:16:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2379:14:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
2361:13:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
2336:13:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
2312:12:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
2281:20:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
2259:11:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
2235:10:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2202:10:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2184:09:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2167:04:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2148:22:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
2025:00:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
1998:00:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
1947:15:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
1920:14:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
1898:09:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
1830:00:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
1812:14:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
1774:03:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
1752:03:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
1734:20:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
1708:18:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
1690:15:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
1672:03:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
1652:A Textbook of Mathematics XI
1630:14:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
1607:13:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
1574:10:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
1537:11:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
1518:05:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
1499:05:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
1440:14:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
1418:16:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1395:16:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1365:16:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1344:16:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1311:14:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
1287:15:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1248:14:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1205:16:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
1150:14:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1124:11:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1097:11:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1065:10:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1029:10:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
1010:Follow-up discussion on move
981:02:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
956:09:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
933:09:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
919:02:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
900:01:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
875:00:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
823:09:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
213:21:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2781:
2730:Start-Class vital articles
2559:talking around the subject
1871:article. When people type
774:14:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
764:told to look up monomial.
750:05:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
1232:binomial (disambiguation)
1224:Binomial (disambiguation)
1071:Binomial (disambiguation)
846:Binomial (disambiguation)
145:
78:
57:
2707:Please do not modify it.
2120:", it was getting about
2045:Please do not modify it.
1966:Please do not modify it.
1176:Please do not modify it.
996:Please do not modify it.
793:Please do not modify it.
152:project's priority scale
1660:Engineering Mathematics
1461:, the example given at
109:WikiProject Mathematics
2538:. To the extent that
2485:That's ambiguous with
2269:Binomial (mathematics)
1678:Binomial (mathematics)
1039:Binomial (mathematics)
886:the search engine test
834:Binomial (mathematics)
721:
610:
377:
324:
263:
2487:Binomial nomenclature
2442:partial title matches
2085:Binomial (polynomial)
2005:Binomial (polynomial)
1882:Binomial (polynomial)
1857:Binomial (polynomial)
1722:Binomial (polynomial)
1718:Binomial (expression)
1475:binomial distribution
1295:Binomial (polynomial)
1212:Binomial (polynomial)
1035:Binomial (polynomial)
1017:binomial (polynomial)
838:binomial nomenclature
722:
611:
378:
304:
264:
36:level-5 vital article
2469:Binomial (two terms)
1483:binomial coefficient
1258:Sequoia sempervirens
621:
389:
276:
220:
132:mathematics articles
2561:to create content,
2393:partial title match
2128:directly and about
2109:Binomial expression
2090:Binomial expression
2013:Binomial expression
1587:Binomial expression
1524:the math references
1506:binomial expression
1487:binomial -wikipedia
1467:binomial expression
1428:Binomial expression
1299:Binomial expression
1043:Binomial (equation)
944:Polynomial equation
2597:You're right that
2540:Binomial (algebra)
2420:Binomial (algebra)
2397:Binomial (algebra)
2385:Binomial (algebra)
2367:Binomial (algebra)
2320:Binomial (algebra)
2300:Binomial (algebra)
2265:Binomial (algebra)
2246:Binomial (algebra)
1104:WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT
717:
606:
373:
259:
101:Mathematics portal
45:content assessment
2689:
2135:Binomial equation
2122:300 views per day
2009:Binomial equation
1810:
1724:really so bad? —
1605:
1572:
1459:mercury (element)
1274:Spencer (surname)
1202:
1048:Binomial equation
877:
811:Binomial equation
696:
673:
660:
629:
585:
565:
543:
530:
504:
484:
471:
452:
432:
403:
339:
201:a similar problem
197:
180:comment added by
166:
165:
162:
161:
158:
157:
2772:
2709:
2687:
2389:Binomial theorem
2324:Binomial theorem
2297:
2137:
2111:
2092:
2075:
2070:
2065:
2047:
1968:
1935:binomial theorem
1904:binomial theorem
1809:
1807:
1795:
1604:
1602:
1590:
1571:
1569:
1557:
1479:binomial theorem
1465:. I now support
1426:No objection to
1379:
1301:has my support.
1228:WP:PRIMARY TOPIC
1200:
1178:
1086:
1080:
1050:
998:
861:
795:
726:
724:
723:
718:
707:
706:
697:
689:
684:
683:
674:
666:
661:
653:
630:
625:
615:
613:
612:
607:
596:
595:
586:
584:
576:
566:
558:
544:
536:
531:
523:
520:
515:
514:
505:
503:
495:
485:
477:
472:
464:
461:
453:
445:
434:
433:
425:
404:
393:
382:
380:
379:
374:
372:
371:
356:
355:
346:
345:
344:
331:
323:
318:
300:
299:
268:
266:
265:
260:
258:
257:
248:
247:
235:
234:
196:
174:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
2780:
2779:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2705:
2426:to this title.
2424:strongly oppose
2287:
2133:
2130:6 views per day
2114:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
2107:
2104:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
2088:
2073:
2068:
2063:
2043:
2033:
2007:is better than
1982:
1977:
1964:
1805:
1800:
1796:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1567:
1562:
1558:
1382:on my talk page
1373:
1327:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
1174:
1164:
1084:
1078:
1055:, of course). —
1046:
1012:
1007:
994:
791:
781:
757:
738:
698:
675:
619:
618:
587:
577:
521:
506:
496:
462:
420:
387:
386:
357:
347:
326:
291:
274:
273:
249:
239:
226:
218:
217:
203:
175:
171:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
92:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
2778:
2776:
2768:
2767:
2762:
2757:
2752:
2747:
2742:
2737:
2732:
2722:
2721:
2717:
2716:
2702:requested move
2696:
2695:
2694:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2581:
2570:
2555:
2548:
2547:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2505:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2363:
2338:
2314:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2237:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2187:
2186:
2169:
2126:1 view per day
2083:
2081:
2055:
2054:
2040:requested move
2034:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2027:
1981:
1978:
1976:
1975:
1961:requested move
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1933:, or possibly
1923:
1922:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1814:
1803:
1798:
1777:
1776:
1755:
1754:
1737:
1736:
1711:
1710:
1693:
1692:
1674:
1633:
1632:
1620:and confusing.
1610:
1609:
1598:
1593:
1577:
1576:
1565:
1560:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1421:
1420:
1398:
1397:
1368:
1367:
1347:
1346:
1314:
1313:
1290:
1289:
1210:
1208:
1186:
1185:
1171:requested move
1165:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1138:
1130:
1069:I have edited
1011:
1008:
1006:
1005:
991:requested move
985:
984:
983:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
903:
902:
828:
826:
803:
802:
788:requested move
782:
780:
777:
756:
753:
737:
734:
716:
713:
710:
705:
701:
695:
692:
687:
682:
678:
672:
669:
664:
659:
656:
651:
648:
645:
642:
639:
636:
633:
628:
605:
602:
599:
594:
590:
583:
580:
575:
572:
569:
564:
561:
556:
553:
550:
547:
542:
539:
534:
529:
526:
518:
513:
509:
502:
499:
494:
491:
488:
483:
480:
475:
470:
467:
459:
456:
451:
448:
443:
440:
437:
431:
428:
423:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
402:
399:
396:
370:
367:
364:
360:
354:
350:
343:
338:
335:
330:
322:
317:
314:
311:
307:
303:
298:
294:
290:
287:
284:
281:
271:
256:
252:
246:
242:
238:
233:
229:
225:
202:
199:
170:
167:
164:
163:
160:
159:
156:
155:
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2777:
2766:
2763:
2761:
2758:
2756:
2753:
2751:
2748:
2746:
2743:
2741:
2738:
2736:
2733:
2731:
2728:
2727:
2725:
2715:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2697:
2693:
2690:
2684:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2671:
2670:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2568:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2553:
2550:
2549:
2545:
2544:wikt:binomial
2541:
2537:
2536:wikt:binomial
2533:
2529:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2504:
2500:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2463:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2341:Support merge
2339:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2318:
2315:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2295:
2291:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2247:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2209:
2208:
2203:
2199:
2195:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2136:
2132:through the "
2131:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2101:
2096:
2091:
2086:
2080:
2079:
2076:
2071:
2066:
2060:
2059:no consensus.
2053:
2051:
2046:
2041:
2036:
2035:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1979:
1974:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1956:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1851:
1850:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1813:
1808:
1802:
1793:
1792:binomial name
1789:
1785:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1608:
1603:
1597:
1588:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1575:
1570:
1564:
1555:
1554:binomial name
1551:
1547:
1544:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1525:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1377:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1197:
1195:
1191:
1184:
1182:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1166:
1161:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1136:
1135:primary topic
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1083:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1009:
1004:
1002:
997:
992:
987:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
967:
966:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
936:
935:
934:
930:
926:
922:
921:
920:
916:
912:
907:
906:
905:
904:
901:
897:
893:
890:
887:
883:
880:
879:
878:
876:
872:
868:
865:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
825:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
801:
799:
794:
789:
784:
783:
778:
776:
775:
771:
767:
761:
754:
752:
751:
747:
743:
736:Citations????
735:
733:
730:
727:
714:
711:
708:
703:
699:
693:
690:
685:
680:
676:
670:
667:
662:
657:
654:
649:
646:
643:
637:
634:
631:
616:
603:
600:
597:
592:
588:
581:
578:
570:
567:
562:
559:
548:
545:
540:
537:
527:
524:
516:
511:
507:
500:
497:
489:
486:
481:
478:
468:
465:
457:
454:
449:
446:
441:
438:
435:
429:
426:
417:
414:
411:
405:
400:
397:
394:
384:
368:
365:
362:
358:
352:
348:
336:
333:
315:
312:
309:
305:
301:
296:
288:
285:
282:
269:
254:
244:
240:
236:
231:
227:
215:
214:
211:
207:
200:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:210.87.251.41
179:
168:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2706:
2699:
2672:
2558:
2527:
2465:New proposal
2464:
2423:
2401:
2340:
2316:
2243:
2239:
2210:
2171:
2153:
2082:
2058:
2056:
2044:
2037:
1983:
1980:No consensus
1965:
1958:
1872:
1852:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1582:
1552:rather than
1545:
1454:
1405:
1352:
1330:
1322:
1317:
1270:Nomenclature
1257:
1253:
1218:– Also move
1209:
1189:
1187:
1175:
1168:
1107:
1013:
995:
988:
968:
881:
863:
849:
827:
806:
804:
792:
785:
766:Federalist51
762:
758:
739:
731:
728:
617:
385:
270:
216:
208:
204:
176:— Preceding
172:
148:Mid-priority
147:
107:
73:Mid‑priority
51:WikiProjects
34:
2712:move review
2636:BarrelProof
2607:BarrelProof
2495:BarrelProof
2446:BarrelProof
2406:BarrelProof
2273:BarrelProof
2140:BarrelProof
2050:move review
2017:BarrelProof
1971:move review
1902:There is a
1766:BarrelProof
1726:BarrelProof
1700:70.51.44.60
1682:BarrelProof
1676:Anyone for
1432:BarrelProof
1410:BarrelProof
1376:BarrelProof
1357:BarrelProof
1336:BarrelProof
1181:move review
1116:BarrelProof
1057:BarrelProof
1001:move review
973:70.51.44.60
948:BarrelProof
911:BarrelProof
854:BarrelProof
798:move review
742:A math-wiki
123:Mathematics
114:mathematics
70:Mathematics
41:Start-class
2724:Categories
2681:Cúchullain
2677:polynomial
2532:polynomial
2513:H. Humbert
2383:I suppose
2371:H. Humbert
2365:I support
2345:Polynomial
2294:H. Humbert
2223:Polynomial
2215:Polynomial
2176:H. Humbert
2095:WP:NATURAL
1990:H. Humbert
1931:polynomial
1912:H. Humbert
1886:Polynomial
1869:polynomial
1861:polynomial
1822:H. Humbert
1818:this ngram
1744:H. Humbert
1664:H. Humbert
1529:H. Humbert
1491:H. Humbert
1471:this ngram
1194:Cúchullain
1082:other uses
940:Polynomial
925:H. Humbert
892:H. Humbert
2650:SmokeyJoe
2621:SmokeyJoe
2599:trinomial
2585:SmokeyJoe
2574:trinomial
2402:suggested
2349:Mark MacD
2317:Oppose to
2251:SmokeyJoe
2219:Mark MacD
1939:Mark MacD
1890:Mark MacD
1865:Monomials
1469:based on
1303:Plantdrew
1279:Plantdrew
867:George Ho
864:Relisted.
850:some form
39:is rated
2603:binomial
2578:Monomial
2509:WP:NCDAB
2491:Binomial
2473:D.Lazard
2428:D.Lazard
2353:D.Lazard
2328:D.Lazard
2290:D.Lazard
2227:D.Lazard
2194:D.Lazard
2159:D.Lazard
2118:Binomial
2100:Binomial
1986:binomial
1878:Binomial
1873:binomial
1788:binomial
1784:binomial
1762:binomial
1622:D.Lazard
1550:binomial
1262:binomial
1240:D.Lazard
1236:binomial
1220:Binomial
1216:Binomial
1190:No move.
1142:D.Lazard
1112:Binomial
1089:D.Lazard
1053:Binomial
1021:D.Lazard
884:. I did
830:Binomial
190:contribs
178:unsigned
169:Comments
2304:Jenks24
2244:Prefer
2211:Comment
2172:Support
2102:" as a
1801:ławomir
1638:If you
1596:ławomir
1583:Comment
1563:ławomir
1510:Jenks24
1455:Support
1387:Jenks24
1353:Comment
1293:Moving
1108:outside
842:WP:PDAB
815:Jenks24
210:Jackzhp
150:on the
2565:, and
2528:Oppose
2240:Oppose
2154:Oppose
2093:– for
2064:Number
1853:Oppose
1546:Oppose
1481:, and
1463:WP:DAB
1406:either
1385:that.
1318:Oppose
1297:-: -->
1254:Oppose
1045:, and
969:Rename
882:Oppose
47:scale.
2673:Merge
2563:WP:OR
2343:into
1908:9,000
1806:Biały
1720:? Is
1618:WP:OR
1601:Biały
1568:Biały
1266:-onym
1051:(and
807:moved
28:This
2654:talk
2640:talk
2625:talk
2611:talk
2589:talk
2517:talk
2499:talk
2477:talk
2450:talk
2432:talk
2410:talk
2375:talk
2357:talk
2332:talk
2308:talk
2292:and
2277:talk
2255:talk
2231:talk
2198:talk
2180:talk
2163:talk
2144:talk
2021:talk
1994:talk
1943:talk
1916:talk
1894:talk
1826:talk
1770:talk
1748:talk
1730:talk
1704:talk
1686:talk
1668:talk
1626:talk
1533:talk
1514:talk
1495:talk
1436:talk
1414:talk
1391:talk
1361:talk
1340:talk
1325:the
1307:talk
1283:talk
1244:talk
1146:talk
1120:talk
1093:talk
1061:talk
1025:talk
977:talk
952:talk
942:and
929:talk
915:talk
896:talk
871:talk
858:talk
819:talk
770:talk
746:talk
186:talk
2704:.
2675:to
2605:. —
2576:.
1963:.
1884:to
1680:? —
1585:.
1489:).
1430:. —
1331:not
1323:not
1222:to
993:.
809:to
142:Mid
2726::
2656:)
2642:)
2627:)
2613:)
2591:)
2583:--
2519:)
2511:.
2501:)
2479:)
2467::
2452:)
2434:)
2412:)
2377:)
2359:)
2351:.
2334:)
2310:)
2302:?
2279:)
2257:)
2233:)
2225:.
2200:)
2182:)
2165:)
2146:)
2087:→
2042:.
2023:)
1996:)
1988:?
1945:)
1937:.
1918:)
1896:)
1888:.
1828:)
1820:.
1772:)
1750:)
1732:)
1706:)
1688:)
1670:)
1650:,
1628:)
1535:)
1516:)
1497:)
1477:,
1438:)
1416:)
1393:)
1363:)
1342:)
1309:)
1285:)
1246:)
1238:.
1214:→
1173:.
1148:)
1122:)
1095:)
1085:}}
1079:{{
1063:)
1041:,
1027:)
1019:.
979:)
954:)
931:)
917:)
898:)
873:)
862:--
832:→
821:)
790:.
772:)
748:)
694:16
663:−
568:−
546:−
487:−
366:−
321:∞
306:∑
237:−
206:0
192:)
188:•
2688:c
2685:/
2652:(
2638:(
2634:—
2623:(
2609:(
2587:(
2569:.
2515:(
2497:(
2475:(
2448:(
2430:(
2408:(
2373:(
2355:(
2330:(
2306:(
2296::
2288:@
2275:(
2253:(
2229:(
2196:(
2178:(
2161:(
2142:(
2074:7
2069:5
2019:(
1992:(
1941:(
1914:(
1892:(
1824:(
1799:S
1768:(
1746:(
1728:(
1702:(
1684:(
1666:(
1624:(
1594:S
1561:S
1531:(
1512:(
1493:(
1434:(
1412:(
1389:(
1378::
1374:@
1359:(
1338:(
1305:(
1281:(
1242:(
1201:c
1198:/
1144:(
1118:(
1091:(
1059:(
1023:(
975:(
950:(
927:(
913:(
894:(
869:(
856:(
817:(
768:(
744:(
715:.
712:.
709:.
704:3
700:x
691:1
686:+
681:2
677:x
671:8
668:1
658:2
655:x
650:+
647:1
644:=
641:)
638:x
635:+
632:1
627:(
604:.
601:.
598:.
593:3
589:x
582:!
579:3
574:)
571:2
563:2
560:1
555:(
552:)
549:1
541:2
538:1
533:(
528:2
525:1
517:+
512:2
508:x
501:!
498:2
493:)
490:1
482:2
479:1
474:(
469:2
466:1
458:+
455:x
450:2
447:1
442:+
439:1
436:=
430:2
427:1
422:)
418:x
415:+
412:1
409:(
406:=
401:x
398:+
395:1
369:j
363:c
359:b
353:j
349:a
342:)
337:j
334:c
329:(
316:0
313:=
310:j
302:=
297:c
293:)
289:b
286:+
283:a
280:(
255:2
251:)
245:2
241:x
232:1
228:x
224:(
184:(
154:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
