71:
53:
81:
254:
169:
151:
429:
not opposed to having an animated image rather than the code, but I don't think that IE not supporting it is a reason to exclude anything. Also, I think it's unreasonable to expect a user to paste the code into a page, especially because the standard code doesn't work in
Knowledge (XXG) anyway. If a small bit of flashing text is so obtrusive people don't want it on the page, we could add a hide/show button to it.
292:. 😄 I'm worried that it's a little too flashy, but it is slowed down to reduce eye strain. Reading some old comments on this talk page. I don't think that an example of the blink element is risky for seizures (especially since this example was on the MDN website for over a decade), but to be safe we can convert the gif to a video file that the user would need to click to play with a warning in the caption?
22:
998:
It seems that you have been continually removing examples and illustrations from this article for thirteen years, and during this time you have not offered any rationale for the removal based on consensus, policy, guidelines or evidence. Please do not remove it again, unless you can come up with some
709:
The lead paragraph says that the blink tag is not supported by
Internet Explorer, and the Usage section says it is supported by Internet Explorer. I don't have any Windows computers nearby to test on (and my Windows XP VM is quite dead at the moment), can someone verify IE support (perhaps it was
527:
Yes- I was just thinking we need an example here. If some can't see it blink, it won't matter in fact it will illustrate the article's statement that it doesn't do it in
Internet Explorer. A lot more people use firefox now than in the past. As to intruding itself on the reader, it's not porn or
428:
Just because some browsers don't support images (or certain types of images) doesn't mean we remove images from pages. I realize that category is the minority, but the basic principle still stands. It doesn't detriment the majority of users to have an example, and it can benefit the remainder. I'm
410:
Specifically, it isn't supported by
Internet Explorer, which is still the most common browser. If an example of what blinking text looks like is really required it should be done with an image, but adding blinking content to pages is still a really bad idea. The article contains an example of the
873:
So. I keep making these little sub-headings on the appropriate page, nobody but me puts text under them when they re-add the blinking seizure trigger, and I'm the one who gets threatened with being blocked. Can we at least have a discussion before the block hammer comes
1032:
You are bothering me over an eight-year-old talk page message that nobody responded to at the time. If you want to have a discussion, great. I've been trying to discuss this for years, as you can see, but if you just want to use policy to bother me I don't have the
893:
This is absurd. People keep re-adding the seizure trigger without even attempting to discuss it here, and everyone's expected to be OK with triggering seizures in people? The browser makers removed the damned tag for a
923:
ever had a seizure caused by the blink tag? Browser makers removed the blink tag because it was not being used anymore, it had user experience issues and its use was criticized by most web designers.
1003:, since there are thousands of Knowledge (XXG) articles with animated images and videos in them, which we do not censor preemptively on the basis that they might(?) cause someone to have a seizure.
272:
644:
Our own sources say that the image could cause seizures, so I've removed it. The fact it's incorrect is just another reason it never should have been in the article in the first place. —
481:
Perhaps link to an example somewhere in this article, so it is not forced upon users? An image can be linked by putting colon after the left two brackets - like ] produces
618:
tag is showing in the image, so the either the image is wrong or the caption is wrong. I know it is intended to be a joke, but I think
Knowledge (XXG) should be correct.
1167:
1163:
1149:
752:
The article says Apple's Safari supports the blink tag, but a test on Safari 6.0 (7536.25) on Mac OS X 10.7.4 does not blink. Same test HTML blinks in
Firefox 12.0.
264:
The example doesn't blink (anymore?) in Chrome because many browser vendors cancelled the support for it. Should be replaced by a GIF that shows, what <BLINK: -->
1247:
217:
1232:
459:
taken into account in
Knowledge (XXG) — it's why all images uploaded as SVG are converted to PNG for display in articles; for example, all of the images in the
127:
223:
133:
463:
are actually all PNG files generated from the original uploaded SVG. I think perhaps this blinking text issue should be brought up on the talk page for
870:
It is far more important than any
Knowledge (XXG) rules, and it is impossible to justify re-adding it without at least discussing it on the talk page.
1106:
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add
1242:
193:
1237:
1227:
667:. It has been statistically proven that this does not cause seizures except in the severely epileptic. It's not like you don't already have a
103:
591:
289:
411:
source code needed to produce blinking text, and if a reader really needs to see it in action they can paste it into a page to try it out. —
930:
675:
522:
762:
328:
625:
276:
176:
156:
805:
847:
Consensus is meaningless when an element of the page could hurt someone. We're not going to engage in OR or synthesis on this one.—
94:
58:
1252:
1055:"). I would be fine with opening an RfC or something, but I am opposed to a slow-motion edit war over the course of a decade.
502:
33:
248:
337:
Technically, I suppose, but it's probably more famous (infamous) as simply the "blink tag." Move and leave redirect?--
710:
added or removed from a specific version? Use something like IE Collection on XP to test?) and correct the article?
1063:
1011:
575:
has added an example straight to the page. Did I miss something or did he just not read our ongoing conversation?
464:
1166:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
934:
679:
39:
21:
324:
766:
629:
548:
Sigh I would have made one but I don't think I'm allowed- is it really banned for one word, I wanted to use
926:
809:
801:
758:
621:
316:
268:
585:
514:
189:
543:
384:
1205:
1185:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1173:
320:
192:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
102:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1114:
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
866:
I keep removing the blinking text for the simple reason that our own cites say it can cause seizures.
80:
70:
52:
1140:
671:. Here is an example of a blinking text image that you could add (I donate it to the public domain):
1119:
434:
1034:
993:
977:
953:
899:
875:
848:
690:
645:
976:
OK, so we're going to risk seizures. We can at least give the epileptics a fighting chance here.—
829:
718:
491:
297:
1170:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
549:
338:
253:
1186:
883:
826:
576:
506:
1101:
1038:
981:
957:
903:
879:
852:
775:
694:
649:
472:
1201:
833:
783:
737:
528:
anything lol, I will make an understated one, and try and make it as unannoying as possible.
1193:
672:
1109:
999:
evidence that it is causing people to have seizures. I find your claim extremely unlikely
552:
529:
482:
86:
1152:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1068:
1016:
689:
So it doesn't cause seizures except when it does? No. Sorry. Not going in the article.—
430:
1192:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1159:
898:, and resorting to hacks to re-implement it might be just the tiniest bit antisocial.—
551:
and no, one word can't cause seizures lol:) I'm going to place a link somewhere here.
1221:
1091:
714:
668:
572:
487:
293:
889:
Another day, another complete lack of discussion before re-adding, another removal.
468:
412:
367:
355:
779:
733:
616:
The caption of the image on the page says "An illustration of the <blink: -->
168:
150:
1158:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
398:
76:
1057:
1027:
1005:
185:
383:
An entry about the blink tag, yet no examples of it? Kind of funny, eh? --
181:
99:
354:
for correct terminology and in line with the naming of articles such as
1213:
1072:
1042:
1020:
985:
961:
938:
907:
856:
837:
813:
787:
741:
722:
698:
683:
653:
633:
566:
496:
476:
438:
415:
401:
387:
370:
341:
301:
280:
1047:
Since leaving this message, you removed it an additional two times ("
868:
That is an issue which goes over and above our notions of consensus.
312:
This article should more properly be called "Blink element type".
1120:
http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Content&ID=12
663:
Most implementations of the blink tag only flash it between 1-2
397:, under the rationale that it wouldn't work in some browsers. -
507:
460:
15:
1125:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
827:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/).--
664:
485:. The description can be made better using a piped link.
1090:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
673:
http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/2291/blinkingtext.gif
290:
from the now defunct MDN docs that described the element
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1095:
1052:
1048:
729:
501:
Ah, the joys of collaboration. A much better idea than
394:
180:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1162:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
728:The confusion appears to have been caused by an IP
1053:Removed blinking text that made article unreadable
222:This article has not yet received a rating on the
132:This article has not yet received a rating on the
556:
533:
562:
539:
748:Claims Safari supports but tests do not confirm
617:element in action", however, the <blink: -->
1148:This message was posted before February 2018.
517:
515:
287:I added a GIF that showed what <BLINK: -->
8:
862:Blink text: OK, let's talk about this again.
732:back in March. IE never supported blink. --
559:
536:
19:
266:
145:
47:
571:I thought we had agreed to only link it?
1049:That's deeply annoying so it's gone now.
553:
530:
824:Firefox has just removed <blink: -->
577:
393:There was one, but it was removed with
147:
49:
861:
1248:Unknown-importance Computing articles
1137:to let others know (documentation at
273:2003:58:EC3E:E210:C90B:E553:918E:D227
202:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
1233:Unknown-importance Internet articles
174:This article is within the scope of
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet
92:This article is within the scope of
843:Remove potential source of seizures
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
1094:. Please take a moment to review
820:Firefox just removed it in 23beta
778:blink, either as a tag or CSS. --
252:
246:
167:
149:
79:
69:
51:
20:
586:
1243:Start-Class Computing articles
1118:Attempted to fix sourcing for
939:18:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
705:Contradiction about IE support
587:
519:
509:
205:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
1238:WikiProject Internet articles
1228:Start-Class Internet articles
699:21:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
684:02:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
592:21:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
578:
567:18:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
544:18:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
523:05:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
497:04:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
477:13:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
465:Knowledge (XXG):Accessibility
439:23:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
371:19:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
281:00:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
247:
196:and see a list of open tasks.
115:Template:WikiProject Internet
106:and see a list of open tasks.
1073:00:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
1043:23:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
1021:23:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
798:Need some info about that.
654:21:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
416:12:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
402:01:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
388:00:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
962:07:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
908:13:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
884:03:35, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
857:02:01, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
755:17:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
634:20:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
342:19:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
1269:
1214:20:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
1179:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1112:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1087:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
794:Google blink render engine
788:23:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
742:23:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
244:
224:project's importance scale
134:project's importance scale
986:18:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
952:Our own cites say it is.—
919:a "seizure trigger". Has
838:16:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
814:08:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
723:20:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
302:09:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
221:
162:
131:
64:
46:
579:
308:Article name (Blink tag)
1083:External links modified
972:Moved example to bottom
1253:All Computing articles
825:from version 23 beta (
669:seizure inducing image
612:Wrong Image or caption
190:information technology
28:This article is rated
177:WikiProject Computing
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1160:regular verification
659:No worry of seizures
95:WikiProject Internet
1150:After February 2018
1129:parameter below to
331:) 20 September 2005
1155:InternetArchiveBot
730:removing some text
505:, Graham, thanks!
364:Blink element type
241:Example got broken
208:Computing articles
34:content assessment
1212:
1180:
929:comment added by
804:comment added by
761:comment added by
624:comment added by
366:redirect here. --
350:I've moved it to
333:
319:comment added by
283:
271:comment added by
238:
237:
234:
233:
230:
229:
144:
143:
140:
139:
118:Internet articles
1260:
1208:
1207:Talk to my owner
1203:
1178:
1177:
1156:
1144:
1113:
1105:
1031:
997:
941:
816:
776:does not support
770:
636:
589:
588:
583:
582:
581:
564:
561:
558:
555:
541:
538:
535:
532:
520:
518:
516:
512:
511:
494:
483:Image:Onslow.jpg
455:Browser support
332:
313:
265:did. Franky666
256:
250:
249:
210:
209:
206:
203:
200:
171:
164:
163:
153:
146:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1218:
1217:
1211:
1206:
1171:
1164:have permission
1154:
1138:
1107:
1099:
1085:
1025:
991:
974:
924:
891:
864:
845:
822:
799:
796:
756:
750:
707:
661:
642:
619:
614:
492:
381:
314:
310:
262:
261:
260:
243:
207:
204:
201:
198:
197:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
87:Internet portal
85:
78:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1266:
1264:
1256:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1220:
1219:
1204:
1198:
1197:
1190:
1123:
1122:
1098:. You may add
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
973:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
945:
944:
943:
942:
931:177.124.111.21
890:
887:
863:
860:
844:
841:
821:
818:
795:
792:
791:
790:
749:
746:
745:
744:
706:
703:
702:
701:
676:184.100.14.144
660:
657:
641:
638:
613:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
569:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
421:
420:
419:
418:
405:
404:
385:24.249.108.133
380:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
345:
344:
309:
306:
305:
304:
251:
245:
242:
239:
236:
235:
232:
231:
228:
227:
220:
214:
213:
211:
194:the discussion
172:
160:
159:
154:
142:
141:
138:
137:
130:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1265:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1244:
1241:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1223:
1216:
1215:
1209:
1202:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1175:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1151:
1146:
1142:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1103:
1097:
1093:
1092:Blink element
1088:
1082:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1029:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1002:
995:
990:
989:
988:
987:
983:
979:
971:
963:
959:
955:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
940:
936:
932:
928:
922:
918:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
905:
901:
897:
888:
886:
885:
881:
877:
871:
869:
859:
858:
854:
850:
842:
840:
839:
835:
831:
828:
819:
817:
815:
811:
807:
803:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
772:
771:
768:
764:
763:24.215.110.18
760:
753:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
711:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
674:
670:
666:
658:
656:
655:
651:
647:
640:Image Removed
639:
637:
635:
631:
627:
623:
611:
593:
590:
584:
574:
573:User:Mstuomel
570:
568:
565:
550:
547:
546:
545:
542:
526:
525:
524:
521:
513:
504:
500:
499:
498:
495:
490:
489:
484:
480:
479:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
440:
436:
432:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
417:
414:
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
389:
386:
378:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:Blink element
349:
348:
347:
346:
343:
340:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:82.36.194.223
318:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
285:
284:
282:
278:
274:
270:
259:
255:
240:
225:
219:
216:
215:
212:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
178:
173:
170:
166:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
135:
129:
126:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
82:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1199:
1174:source check
1153:
1147:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1124:
1089:
1086:
1064:
1058:
1056:
1012:
1006:
1004:
1000:
975:
925:— Preceding
920:
916:
895:
892:
872:
867:
865:
846:
823:
800:— Preceding
797:
757:— Preceding
754:
751:
712:
708:
662:
643:
626:190.64.133.1
615:
486:
456:
382:
379:No examples?
363:
359:
356:Meta element
351:
311:
267:— Preceding
263:
257:
175:
93:
40:WikiProjects
1141:Sourcecheck
1001:prima facie
806:95.70.80.73
620:—Preceding
580:l'aqùatique
461:SVG article
315:—Preceding
30:Start-class
1222:Categories
1194:this tool
1187:this tool
713:Thanks --
510:aqúatique
431:Vicarious
395:this edit
360:Blink tag
199:Computing
186:computing
182:computers
157:Computing
1200:Cheers.—
1102:cbignore
927:unsigned
802:unsigned
759:unsigned
715:AndreniW
622:unsigned
329:contribs
317:unsigned
294:Jamesjpk
269:unsigned
109:Internet
100:Internet
59:Internet
1210::Online
1127:checked
1096:my edit
1051:" and "
1035:chbarts
994:Chbarts
978:chbarts
954:chbarts
900:chbarts
876:chbarts
849:chbarts
774:Safari
691:chbarts
646:chbarts
469:Safalra
413:Safalra
368:Safalra
1135:failed
1110:nobots
1033:time.—
921:anyone
915:It is
896:reason
874:down?—
830:tumaru
780:Gyrobo
734:Gyrobo
488:Graham
188:, and
36:scale.
399:Amake
339:Mxg75
288:did,
258:Added
1131:true
1039:talk
1028:JPxG
982:talk
958:talk
935:talk
904:talk
880:talk
853:talk
834:talk
810:talk
784:talk
767:talk
738:talk
719:talk
695:talk
680:talk
650:talk
630:talk
503:mine
473:talk
435:talk
362:and
325:talk
298:talk
277:talk
1168:RfC
1145:).
1133:or
1069:🗯️
1017:🗯️
917:not
563:mum
557:kin
554:Mer
540:mum
534:kin
531:Mer
467:. —
218:???
128:???
1224::
1181:.
1176:}}
1172:{{
1143:}}
1139:{{
1108:{{
1104:}}
1100:{{
1059:jp
1041:)
1007:jp
984:)
960:)
937:)
906:)
882:)
855:)
836:)
812:)
786:)
769:)
740:)
721:)
697:)
682:)
665:Hz
652:)
632:)
508:l'
493:87
475:)
457:is
437:)
358:.
327:•
300:)
279:)
184:,
1196:.
1189:.
1065:g
1062:×
1037:(
1030::
1026:@
1013:g
1010:×
996::
992:@
980:(
956:(
933:(
902:(
878:(
851:(
832:(
808:(
782:(
765:(
736:(
717:(
693:(
678:(
648:(
628:(
560:s
537:s
471:(
433:(
323:(
296:(
275:(
226:.
136:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
