147:
485:
22:
77:
53:
87:
320:
but even taking that into account I think the proper response is to make the user become aware that there is also a book (you know, one of those things that you have to read). After all, he/she is still only one click away from the page he/she wants, and may even be glad to have been made aware of the existance of the book.
225:
I don't understand what you mean by "Links to this page overwhelmingly are meant for the film." I was, of course, prepared to re-link all the incorrect links. I had, in fact, all the relevant pages open in IE in preparation for creating the disambiguation page, and relinking and modifying the primary
269:
It's fine to add another dablink for the book. I recognize that you're willing to pipe the existing links, but their makeup does imply that searches are for the film. Newly created wikilinks will also likely be meant to link to the film. We optimize for usability - when the reader types something in
360:
Just did a very quick check on "What links here". 59 links for the film and 26 for the book. A large number (29, I think) of the links to the film are due to it being in the "Films directed by Clint
Eastwood" template. If we neglect that template the links to the book and film are almost 50-50. And
319:
more sense that an ambiguous search (or link) results in the user being made aware that the search was ambiguous, and presented with the relevant possibilities to choose among. It may be true that most searches are for the film (the world sometimes strikes me as becoming more and more illiterate),
452:
I think I've done what's necessary. Interestingly, three of the links to the film page turned out to be incorrect, they should have pointed at the novel. On the other hand, I admit that
Dekimasu had a very good point regarding the number of links to the novel that were due to a template.
534:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
448:
came and did a hit-and-run move! Not good, in my opinion. No disambig page, no fixing up of links among the directly affected pages, no fixing of all the links that pointed at this page. (And this guy has applied to be a
Knowledge administrator,
226:
pages, and then when that was in place I'd have worked my way through all of the "what links here" pages. It sure doesn't help one's motivation when an attempt to improve
Knowledge gets sabotaged.
531:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
252:
page has disambig links to the film and an obscure rock song (with incorrect linkage - the band does have a page here), and no link to the book. It's not systematic or correct. --
156:
63:
207:
The order of the works doesn't dictate their location; that has to do with the relative significance of the works. Links to this page overwhelmingly are meant for the film.
573:
578:
512:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
509:
536:
528:
524:
501:
371:
239:
for "blood work" are mostly for the film. That may or may not be true, and I don't think it justifies the film hogging the main page name.
540:
583:
568:
105:
289:
cycle, but I'm sorry you felt that I was sabotaging your work. This discussion would probably benefit from outside opinions.
117:
109:
33:
113:
100:
58:
281:
Anyway, I was writing out my objection to your move when you moved the page. I was surprised to be redirected to
550:
520:
492:
429:
move and making "blood work" a dab page for the the medical treatment, the book, the punk song, and of course,
21:
39:
430:
496:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
546:
445:
411:
248:
Currently the film page has a disambig link to the medical treatment, but not to the book. And the
146:
497:
466:
378:
293:
211:
180:
282:
434:
184:
444:
Here I was, sitting around wondering when one could consider that "consensus" was OK, and
361:
there is also the consideration to those who are looking for the medical treatment... --
454:
362:
338:
270:
the search box, they should be sent where they want to go. That's the rationale behind
253:
198:
194:
It is unfortunate that this article is simply "Blood Work" when the novel came first.
484:
562:
463:
375:
290:
286:
275:
271:
208:
513:
104:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
92:
406:
402:
249:
188:
82:
76:
52:
554:
471:
457:
437:
419:
383:
365:
341:
298:
256:
216:
201:
121:
462:
I'm not too disappointed in the result. Thanks for fixing the links.
370:
More than 75% of those links to the book are due to it being in
179:"Blood Work" should be a disambiguation page, with links to the
15:
483:
145:
508:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
409:(with one redirecting to the other) per arguments above. —
197:
I'll try to do it tomorrow, unless someone objects. --
539:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
480:Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodworkposter.jpg
120:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
19:
187:, to this film, and to the medical usage (
116:. To use this banner, please refer to the
47:
401:a rename and creation of a dab page at
49:
529:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
372:Template:Michael Connelly Bibliography
7:
574:Start-Class American cinema articles
98:This article is within the scope of
579:American cinema task force articles
315:I'm a nerd, and to a nerd it makes
175:Suggest rename to Blood Work (film)
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
154:This article is supported by the
527:. Using one of the templates at
114:regional and topical task forces
85:
75:
51:
20:
337:More opinions would be nice. --
285:when I hit enter. We're in the
541:Media copyright questions page
1:
555:04:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
510:boilerplate fair use template
537:criteria for speedy deletion
472:13:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
458:00:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
438:14:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
420:06:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
384:01:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
366:20:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
342:15:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
299:14:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
257:14:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
217:13:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
202:17:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
600:
521:the image description page
157:American cinema task force
130:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
584:WikiProject Film articles
569:Start-Class film articles
523:and edit it to include a
493:Image:Bloodworkposter.jpg
153:
133:Template:WikiProject Film
70:
46:
502:explanation or rationale
488:
150:
28:This article is rated
504:as to why its use in
487:
149:
276:WP:DAB#Primary topic
446:User:Stormtracker94
106:join the discussion
525:fair use rationale
489:
151:
34:content assessment
431:Blood work (film)
283:Blood Work (film)
250:medical treatment
172:
171:
168:
167:
164:
163:
108:and see lists of
591:
500:but there is no
469:
418:
416:
381:
296:
214:
185:Michael Connelly
138:
137:
134:
131:
128:
101:WikiProject Film
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
599:
598:
594:
593:
592:
590:
589:
588:
559:
558:
482:
467:
412:
410:
379:
294:
235:Maybe you mean
212:
177:
135:
132:
129:
126:
125:
91:
86:
84:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
597:
595:
587:
586:
581:
576:
571:
561:
560:
547:BetacommandBot
481:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
450:
441:
440:
423:
422:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
279:
262:
261:
260:
259:
243:
242:
241:
240:
230:
229:
228:
227:
220:
219:
176:
173:
170:
169:
166:
165:
162:
161:
152:
142:
141:
139:
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
596:
585:
582:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
566:
564:
557:
556:
552:
548:
544:
543:. Thank you.
542:
538:
532:
530:
526:
522:
519:Please go to
517:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
486:
479:
473:
470:
465:
461:
460:
459:
456:
451:
447:
443:
442:
439:
436:
432:
428:
425:
424:
421:
417:
415:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
385:
382:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
364:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
343:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
318:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
300:
297:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
273:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
215:
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
200:
195:
192:
190:
186:
182:
174:
159:
158:
148:
144:
143:
140:
136:film articles
123:
119:
118:documentation
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
545:
533:
518:
505:
491:
490:
426:
413:
398:
316:
236:
196:
193:
178:
155:
99:
40:WikiProjects
435:victor falk
93:Film portal
30:Start-class
563:Categories
414:AjaxSmack
407:Blood Work
403:blood work
189:Blood test
122:guidelines
110:open tasks
455:RenniePet
363:RenniePet
339:RenniePet
254:RenniePet
199:RenniePet
514:fair use
498:fair use
464:Dekimasu
376:Dekimasu
291:Dekimasu
237:searches
209:Dekimasu
64:American
449:twice!)
427:Support
399:Support
287:WP:BRD
272:WP:UCN
36:scale.
181:novel
551:talk
506:this
317:much
274:and
127:Film
112:and
59:Film
405:or
191:).
183:by
565::
553:)
516:.
468:よ!
453:--
433:--
380:よ!
374:.
295:よ!
213:よ!
62::
549:(
278:.
160:.
124:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
