Knowledge

Talk:Branched covering

Source đź“ť

84: 74: 53: 22: 229:
There should be a discussion of Hurewicz theory on this page, or on a separate page. This should include the basic definitions, examples of monodromy representations, and a discussion of how the representation theory of the symmetric group relates to this subject. A good starting place looks like
396:
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "http://localhost:6011/en.wikipedia.org/v1/":): {\displaystyle
140: 184:
These example would be useful if they where written for a wider audience. As they are, they can be understood only by people knowing scheme theory, and are thus of no use for others (see
404:
This is extremely bad writing. The phrase "the largest possible open set" doesn't mean anything, because it doesn't specify what kind of open set it is referring to.
388: 430:
The article never defines the term "ramified". Is it equivalent to "branched"? Is an "unramified covering" a covering map? Some clarification is needed here. --
458: 130: 453: 106: 407:(Of course, "the largest possible open set" without further specification is the entire space, and the complement of the entire space is 412: 343: 271: 242: 169: 162:
Please keep the scheme theoretic examples on this page! The main problem with wikipedia math pages is the lack of useful examples.
97: 58: 209: 305: 33: 328:
a map is a branched covering if it is a covering map everywhere except for a nowhere dense set known as the branch set
290:
There is a circular definition with unramified covering, ramification locus and the definition of the open set W.
21: 416: 347: 275: 173: 246: 213: 39: 301: 83: 342:
I hope someone familiar with the subject can provide a definition, at least for the topological case.
293: 238: 205: 165: 185: 297: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
193: 89: 73: 52: 431: 262:
Adolph Hurwitz (1904-56) and Witold Hurewicz (1859-1919) are two distinct mathematicians.
435: 373: 447: 257:
You refer to "Hurewicz theory" but the article you link to is about "Hurwitz theory".
189: 233: 102: 79: 336:
Nothing wrong with including a rough description — that is a very good idea.
439: 420: 351: 309: 279: 250: 217: 202:
Let's have a separate section then for a scheme-theoretic interpretation.
197: 177: 411:
what the ramification locus is. That complement is the empty set.)
394:(i.e. this is the complement of the largest possible open set 15: 376: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 382: 320:A math article needs a definition of its subject. 333:is not a definition. It is a rough description. 234:http://www.math.colostate.edu/~renzo/IMPA.pdf 8: 395: 338:But it doesn't substitute for a definition. 19: 291: 236: 203: 163: 47: 375: 49: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 316:Article is missing a definition!!! 14: 459:Mid-priority mathematics articles 370:The set of exceptional points on 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 454:Start-Class mathematics articles 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 426:Terminology: branched/ramified 1: 421:18:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC) 352:18:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC) 280:18:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 365:begins with this sentence: 269:What are you talking about? 475: 310:10:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC) 251:02:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 218:17:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 198:07:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 178:02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 440:13:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC) 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 384: 28:This article is rated 385: 357:Extremely bad writing 374: 121:mathematics articles 286:Circular definition 398: 392:ramification locus 380: 363:Ramification locus 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 383:{\displaystyle W} 312: 296:comment added by 253: 241:comment added by 220: 208:comment added by 180: 168:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 466: 389: 387: 386: 381: 323:Unfortunately, 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 474: 473: 469: 468: 467: 465: 464: 463: 444: 443: 428: 372: 371: 359: 331: 318: 288: 227: 225:Hurewicz Theory 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 472: 470: 462: 461: 456: 446: 445: 427: 424: 390:is called the 379: 358: 355: 325: 317: 314: 287: 284: 283: 282: 264: 263: 259: 258: 226: 223: 222: 221: 200: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 471: 460: 457: 455: 452: 451: 449: 442: 441: 437: 433: 425: 423: 422: 418: 414: 413:71.37.182.254 410: 405: 402: 400: 393: 377: 366: 364: 356: 354: 353: 349: 345: 344:71.37.182.254 340: 339: 334: 329: 324: 321: 315: 313: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 285: 281: 277: 273: 272:71.37.182.254 270: 266: 265: 261: 260: 256: 255: 254: 252: 248: 244: 243:97.122.75.155 240: 235: 231: 224: 219: 215: 211: 207: 201: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 181: 179: 175: 171: 170:71.212.234.13 167: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 429: 408: 406: 403: 391: 369: 367: 362: 361:The section 360: 341: 337: 335: 332: 327: 322: 319: 292:— Preceding 289: 268: 237:— Preceding 232: 228: 204:— Preceding 186:WP:TECHNICAL 164:— Preceding 161: 137:Mid-priority 136: 96: 62:Mid‑priority 40:WikiProjects 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 448:Categories 210:161.98.8.3 306:contribs 294:unsigned 239:unsigned 206:unsigned 190:D.Lazard 166:unsigned 158:Examples 298:Rgc1994 139:on the 36:scale. 436:talk 432:Hife 417:talk 348:talk 302:talk 276:talk 267:So: 247:talk 214:talk 194:talk 174:talk 409:not 397:W'} 330:" 188:). 131:Mid 450:: 438:) 419:) 401:" 399:). 350:) 308:) 304:• 278:) 249:) 216:) 196:) 176:) 434:( 415:( 378:W 368:" 346:( 326:" 300:( 274:( 245:( 212:( 192:( 172:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Mid
project's priority scale
unsigned
71.212.234.13
talk
02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
WP:TECHNICAL
D.Lazard
talk
07:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
unsigned
161.98.8.3
talk
17:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
http://www.math.colostate.edu/~renzo/IMPA.pdf
unsigned
97.122.75.155
talk
02:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑