Knowledge

Talk:Bratteli–Vershik diagram

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 22: 192:? Why can't there be more than one path consisting of just maximal edges? Why are the edges totally ordered? They don't have to be, in general, for a Bratteli diagram; is this a required property for the present case? Why is the result a topological system? What is a 140: 162:
I have to say I understood nothing. That might be my fault, but I felt that the part explaining the equations should be put more simply like how it is on the Bratteli diagram article.
196:? (That's currently a redlink in wikipedia). What's the reverse construction? This looks interesting and suggestive but is essentially incomprehensible as currently written. 224: 130: 165:
Reading Will's instructions for the wiki page, he mentioned that it should be in language and format easy enough for the general public to understand.--
219: 106: 197: 97: 58: 33: 21: 201: 193: 39: 83: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 73: 52: 205: 174: 185: 170: 188:
article doesn't explain. What's a maximal edge? Why is there one unique infinite path in E
213: 166: 102: 79: 15: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 8: 19: 47: 49: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 225:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 220:Start-Class mathematics articles 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 206:04:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 109:and see a list of open tasks. 184:What's a minimal edge? The 241: 175:08:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 28:This article is rated 121:mathematics articles 194:topological system 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 180:Needs explanation 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 232: 186:Bratteli diagram 158:Incomprehensible 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 240: 239: 235: 234: 233: 231: 230: 229: 210: 209: 191: 182: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 238: 236: 228: 227: 222: 212: 211: 189: 181: 178: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 237: 226: 223: 221: 218: 217: 215: 208: 207: 203: 199: 195: 187: 179: 177: 176: 172: 168: 163: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 198:67.198.37.16 183: 164: 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 214:Categories 139:on the 167:Oloria 36:scale. 202:talk 171:talk 190:max 131:Low 216:: 204:) 173:) 200:( 169:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
Oloria
talk
08:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Bratteli diagram
topological system
67.198.37.16
talk
04:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Categories
Start-Class mathematics articles
Low-priority mathematics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.