Knowledge

Talk:Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination

Source đź“ť

586: 483: 456: 740: 719: 493: 382: 820: 639: 618: 964:
can reopen the discussion). The accusations and their handling are an important part of the confirmation process; I think it's better to keep it all in one article. We should remove Munro-Leighton altogether. It's clear that it was a hoax, whatever her motives. Did the Senate committee even mention her email to them before the vote? I did a cursory check, didn't find anything, so probably more pre-midterm election posturing.
649: 261: 372: 351: 233: 203: 1297:“ Seldom do older students hang anyplace younger students are” is NOT an objective fact-based statement, it is your own perception of what is “typical”. And the circumstances would not need to be typical for them to be either true or false. Additionally, Brett Kavanaugh is older than Christina Blasey Ford, not vice-versa. You are not proving or disproving anything with this tangent. 320: 1133:
Given subsequent developments regarding Avenatti, should this section either be removed, edited, or at the least have some caveat's regarding statements from Avenatti put in? The stetements of a now disbarred lawyer, convicted of fraud, embezzlement, extortion, etc should be taken with a very large
963:
I think it's pretty much a dead issue. The confirmation is a done deal, and the criminal referrals were to a large part pre-midterm election posturing. The investigation is going to run into the same problem as before, not enough evidence either way, and it's not going to go anywhere (if it does we
1170:
I inserted the following. And it has been rejected, and it seems after over a decade and hundreds of edits to articles, I'm on the Sh-t list. I do have opinions but followed the rules ,including valid references. I've been one Knowledge's strongest advocates, and fear something has changed. The
987:
I suggest you start a new TALK section about removing that one. It seems removable to me on WEIGHT, but there have been past RFCs tagging to RS about how a spectrum of accusations are part of the landscape, and realistically debunked accusations do get bonus WEIGHT from retractions and from folks
1228:
I feel the article right now explains the facts and details of what happened, but doesn't really give the political context - i.e. the "Kavanaugh effect" and why the Republicans (allegedly?) got a boost in the Senate races. Someone who isn't super familiar with US politics won't really understand
948:
Oppose. I think that’s wrong and they are not severable. These are a large part of the WEIGHT for the confirmation process, and the Ford testimony in the confirmation hearings in particular. That they are major part of the article matches to they were a major part of the confirmation. Further
1174:
Senator Amy Klobuchar, began her questioning by descriing her own father having a drinking problem. When questioned about his, Kavanaugh said he "liked beer" and asked if she had a drinking problem herself. "Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh combatively responded to questions from Sen. Amy
919:
Makes sense, because the length of it is overwhelming the information about the confirmation process itself. Also, this takes into account the fact that the allegations kept having a life of their own after the confirmation process was over. New events regarding the allegations have happened
949:
note that allegations even occurred was said to be due to his nomination. Lastly... if it is all removed from here then LEAD would no longer support them being prominent in the top of the article, which again I think it should be. Not in his BLP, and not in its own article. Cheers
1149:
You can add something like that in if you like, it could arguably be considered relevant context; but I think as it stands, the article makes quite clear that the allegations made public by Avenatti were not widely considered credible, even before he was disgraced and disbarred.
1267:
Age if you look under Christine Blasey Ford she said she was 15 . Bret Kavanaugh is a year younger. Physically this is a difference. She I belive it said during the hearings was 2 yrs ahead of him in school. Higher grade people seldom if ever hang authors those in lower
1011:— The sexual assault allegations are an integral part of the nomination hearings, and cannot be properly separated from this topic. Any attempt to split this off into a separate article is just going to result in us having all the content in yet another place (see 929:
The sexual assault allegations do appear to have become a continuing issue separate from the nomination event itself. A summary of the allegations up to the nomination vote, then a link to the sexual allegation issue as it continued past the vote. --
153: 1272:
Bret Kavanaugh he if you read Knowledge on Christine Blasey Ford her age was 15 so he was 14 physically younger. I remember during hearings he was a few grades behind her . Seldom do older students hang anyplace younger students are
1422: 798: 788: 44: 147: 1377: 764: 1417: 190: 523: 1427: 747: 724: 299: 1134:
grain of salt, if at all. Especially when that lawyers own clients said that he lied about what they said, it really reduces the encyclopedic value of the entire section.
540: 194: 1387: 600: 1372: 566: 595: 576: 466: 1392: 1357: 438: 428: 1347: 304: 1397: 530: 287:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1362: 79: 168: 1382: 135: 901: 535: 24: 1367: 1342: 404: 279: 1212: 1352: 85: 1407: 701: 691: 129: 506: 461: 1320: 518: 395: 356: 125: 1412: 969: 175: 920:
recently, e.g. referrals for prosecution on some witnesses and lawyers, which have nothing to do with the nomination itself. —
99: 30: 104: 20: 514:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1402: 1094:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
74: 1232:
I'm gonna work on adding some of that, but I figured I'd post in here first in case others had opinions on it as well. -
1055:- I have to agree these things are to intertwined to be separated. Layout and presentation seems fine in the same place. 752: 331: 1190: 1139: 1025: 984: 965: 845: 760: 141: 65: 202: 185: 585: 849: 662: 623: 213: 1060: 1213:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/09/28/brett-kavanaugh-amy-klobuchar-drinking-apology-tsr-bts-vpx.cnn
1118: 1302: 1256: 1237: 666:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 288: 109: 1328: 1324: 1306: 1282: 1260: 1241: 1194: 1159: 1143: 1135: 1081: 1064: 1047: 1030: 997: 973: 958: 939: 935: 924: 913: 909: 904:
be moved to its own article given the notability of the subject and the length of the section in general.
1043: 1016: 993: 954: 337: 1278: 1103:
The New York Times made a correction to one of its stories about Kavanaugh. This should be mentioned
989: 950: 1178: 1175:
Klobuchar (D-MN) about his drinking habits. He apologized after the committee took a short break."
498: 298:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 245: 319: 217: 1248: 1056: 853: 387: 161: 55: 763:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
403:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
260: 1319:
seems like the wrong term? This isn't about who voted for him but about his anticipated rulings.
1298: 1292: 1274: 1252: 1233: 1155: 1077: 302:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 218: 70: 482: 455: 232: 931: 905: 51: 1039: 828: 215: 819: 238:
A news item involving Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination was featured on Knowledge's
1186: 1020: 1012: 739: 718: 295: 1072:- Makes as little sense as doing a separate article for the Clarence Thomas accusations. 1336: 1151: 1073: 511: 400: 1249:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Brett_Kavanaugh_Supreme_Court_nomination#Political_impact
638: 617: 648: 1182: 756: 654: 644: 488: 377: 371: 350: 239: 844:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 510:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 1119:
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/09/nyt-correction-kavanaugh-story.html
921: 1017:
Christine Blasey Ford#Sexual assault allegation against Brett Kavanaugh
814: 667: 313: 294:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
271: 227: 219: 15: 1171:
following is my edit, that is referenced with a CNN video.
584: 259: 751:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1423:
Mid-importance United States courts and judges articles
252: 160: 1038:: there's no need; the material is fine where it is. 773:
Knowledge:WikiProject United States courts and judges
884:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
776:
Template:WikiProject United States courts and judges
399:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 865:
Split to Brett Kavanaugh sexual assault allegations
1378:B-Class United States articles of High-importance 1418:B-Class United States courts and judges articles 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 887:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 174: 8: 1428:Knowledge articles that use American English 891:The result of this discussion was to Oppose 748:WikiProject United States courts and judges 1176: 1013:Brett Kavanaugh#Sexual assault allegations 832:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 713: 612: 450: 345: 1388:High-importance U.S. Presidents articles 779:United States courts and judges articles 25:Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination 1205: 1111: 715: 614: 452: 347: 317: 1373:High-importance United States articles 852:, this should not be changed without 7: 1393:WikiProject U.S. Presidents articles 1358:Low-importance Conservatism articles 878:The following discussion is closed. 745:This article is within the scope of 660:This article is within the scope of 596:WikiProject United States Presidents 504:This article is within the scope of 393:This article is within the scope of 1348:Biography articles of living people 670:and the subjects encompassed by it. 551:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 23:for discussing improvements to the 1398:WikiProject United States articles 554:Template:WikiProject United States 413:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism 14: 1363:WikiProject Conservatism articles 416:Template:WikiProject Conservatism 1383:B-Class U.S. Presidents articles 1090:The discussion above is closed. 818: 738: 717: 647: 637: 616: 491: 481: 454: 380: 370: 349: 318: 277:This article must adhere to the 231: 201: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1166:Klobachar dialog with Kavanaugh 793:This article has been rated as 770:United States courts and judges 725:United States courts and judges 696:This article has been rated as 571:This article has been rated as 433:This article has been rated as 1368:B-Class United States articles 1343:Knowledge In the news articles 336:It is of interest to multiple 1: 1353:B-Class Conservatism articles 1048:02:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC) 1031:17:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC) 998:17:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC) 988:waving them around. Cheers. 974:05:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC) 959:03:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 940:16:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC) 925:09:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC) 767:and see a list of open tasks. 593:This article is supported by 407:and see a list of open tasks. 280:biographies of living persons 42:Put new text under old text. 1283:16:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC) 1082:23:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC) 1065:03:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC) 914:23:15, 9 November 2018 (UTC) 899:<Start of discussion: --> 761:United States federal judges 753:United States federal courts 1408:Mid-importance law articles 1261:21:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC) 1242:03:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 985:User:Space4Time3Continuum2x 292:must be removed immediately 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1444: 1144:14:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC) 1087:<End of discussion: --> 902:Sexual assault allegations 799:project's importance scale 702:project's importance scale 577:project's importance scale 439:project's importance scale 1329:15:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC) 1307:15:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC) 1224:Lack of political context 1195:20:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 792: 733: 695: 676:Knowledge:WikiProject Law 632: 592: 570: 507:WikiProject United States 476: 432: 365: 344: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1413:WikiProject Law articles 1092:Please do not modify it. 881:Please do not modify it. 679:Template:WikiProject Law 512:United States of America 396:WikiProject Conservatism 1160:23:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 900:I'm proposing that the 966:Space4Time3Continuum2x 589: 557:United States articles 326:This article is rated 265: 75:avoid personal attacks 588: 419:Conservatism articles 263: 195:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 1403:B-Class law articles 850:relevant style guide 846:varieties of English 499:United States portal 105:No original research 848:. According to the 525:Articles Requested! 388:Conservatism portal 1315:"voting" alignment 590: 332:content assessment 266: 86:dispute resolution 47: 1197: 1181:comment added by 1136:ResultingConstant 860: 859: 813: 812: 809: 808: 805: 804: 712: 711: 708: 707: 611: 610: 607: 606: 449: 448: 445: 444: 312: 311: 270: 269: 226: 225: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1435: 1296: 1216: 1210: 1121: 1116: 1028: 1023: 883: 829:American English 825:This article is 822: 815: 781: 780: 777: 774: 771: 742: 735: 734: 729: 721: 714: 684: 683: 680: 677: 674: 657: 652: 651: 641: 634: 633: 628: 620: 613: 559: 558: 555: 552: 549: 501: 496: 495: 494: 485: 478: 477: 472: 469: 458: 451: 421: 420: 417: 414: 411: 390: 385: 384: 383: 374: 367: 366: 361: 353: 346: 329: 323: 322: 314: 300:this noticeboard 272: 255: 235: 228: 220: 206: 205: 196: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1333: 1332: 1317: 1290: 1270: 1247:Section added: 1229:what happened. 1226: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1211: 1207: 1168: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1117: 1113: 1101: 1096: 1095: 1026: 1021: 897: 879: 872: 870:Merger proposal 867: 854:broad consensus 778: 775: 772: 769: 768: 727: 681: 678: 675: 672: 671: 663:WikiProject Law 653: 646: 626: 601:High-importance 573:High-importance 556: 553: 550: 547: 546: 545: 531:Become a Member 497: 492: 490: 471:High‑importance 470: 464: 418: 415: 412: 409: 408: 386: 381: 379: 359: 330:on Knowledge's 327: 251: 222: 221: 216: 193: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1441: 1439: 1431: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1335: 1334: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1130: 1127: 1123: 1122: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1100: 1097: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1067: 1057:ContentEditman 1050: 1033: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 977: 976: 961: 945: 944: 943: 942: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 874: 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 858: 857: 823: 811: 810: 807: 806: 803: 802: 795:Mid-importance 791: 785: 784: 782: 765:the discussion 743: 731: 730: 728:Mid‑importance 722: 710: 709: 706: 705: 698:Mid-importance 694: 688: 687: 685: 659: 658: 642: 630: 629: 627:Mid‑importance 621: 609: 608: 605: 604: 591: 581: 580: 569: 563: 562: 560: 544: 543: 538: 533: 528: 521: 519:Template Usage 515: 503: 502: 486: 474: 473: 459: 447: 446: 443: 442: 435:Low-importance 431: 425: 424: 422: 405:the discussion 392: 391: 375: 363: 362: 360:Low‑importance 354: 342: 341: 335: 324: 310: 309: 305:this help page 289:poorly sourced 275: 268: 267: 257: 253:6 October 2018 236: 224: 223: 214: 212: 211: 208: 207: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1440: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1338: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1314: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1299:SecretName101 1294: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253:Jushyosaha604 1250: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234:Jushyosaha604 1230: 1223: 1214: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1172: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1128: 1120: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1098: 1093: 1088: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1051: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1024: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1007: 1006: 999: 995: 991: 986: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 975: 971: 967: 962: 960: 956: 952: 947: 946: 941: 937: 933: 928: 927: 926: 923: 918: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 903: 890: 889: 888: 885: 882: 876: 875: 869: 864: 862: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830: 824: 821: 817: 816: 800: 796: 790: 787: 786: 783: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 749: 744: 741: 737: 736: 732: 726: 723: 720: 716: 703: 699: 693: 690: 689: 686: 669: 665: 664: 656: 650: 645: 643: 640: 636: 635: 631: 625: 622: 619: 615: 602: 599:(assessed as 598: 597: 587: 583: 582: 578: 574: 568: 565: 564: 561: 548:United States 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 526: 522: 520: 517: 516: 513: 509: 508: 500: 489: 487: 484: 480: 479: 475: 468: 463: 462:United States 460: 457: 453: 440: 436: 430: 427: 426: 423: 406: 402: 398: 397: 389: 378: 376: 373: 369: 368: 364: 358: 355: 352: 348: 343: 339: 333: 325: 321: 316: 315: 307: 306: 301: 297: 293: 290: 286: 282: 281: 276: 274: 273: 262: 258: 254: 249: 248: 247: 241: 237: 234: 230: 229: 210: 209: 204: 200: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1321:149.103.10.5 1318: 1271: 1231: 1227: 1208: 1200: 1177:— Preceding 1173: 1169: 1132: 1114: 1106: 1102: 1091: 1086: 1069: 1052: 1035: 1008: 932:Naaman Brown 906:Quidster4040 898: 886: 880: 877: 861: 841: 837: 833: 826: 794: 746: 697: 682:law articles 661: 594: 572: 536:Project Talk 524: 505: 434: 410:Conservatism 401:conservatism 394: 357:Conservatism 338:WikiProjects 303: 291: 284: 278: 244: 243: 198: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1215:--~~~~ ~~~ 1040:K.e.coffman 990:Markbassett 951:Markbassett 827:written in 757:courthouses 668:legal field 250:section on 246:In the news 148:free images 31:not a forum 1337:Categories 1201:References 1107:References 1099:Correction 655:Law portal 467:Presidents 296:libellous 264:Knowledge 240:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1191:contribs 1179:unsigned 1152:Robofish 1129:Avenatti 1074:Activist 842:traveled 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 838:defense 797:on the 700:on the 575:on the 437:on the 328:B-class 242:in the 199:14 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1293:Tinylp 1275:Tinylp 1268:grades 1070:Oppose 1053:Oppose 1036:Oppose 1009:Oppose 759:, and 541:Alerts 334:scale. 126:Google 1183:Arodb 834:color 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1325:talk 1303:talk 1279:talk 1257:talk 1238:talk 1187:talk 1156:talk 1140:talk 1078:talk 1061:talk 1044:talk 1022:Brad 1015:and 994:talk 970:talk 955:talk 936:talk 910:talk 567:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1019:). 922:JFG 789:Mid 692:Mid 673:Law 624:Law 429:Low 285:BLP 176:TWL 1339:: 1327:) 1305:) 1281:) 1259:) 1251:. 1240:) 1193:) 1189:• 1158:) 1142:) 1080:) 1063:) 1046:) 996:) 972:) 957:) 938:) 912:) 840:, 836:, 755:, 603:). 465:: 197:: 156:) 54:; 1323:( 1301:( 1295:: 1291:@ 1277:( 1255:( 1236:( 1185:( 1154:( 1138:( 1076:( 1059:( 1042:( 1027:v 992:( 968:( 953:( 934:( 908:( 856:. 801:. 704:. 579:. 441:. 340:. 308:. 283:( 256:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1

In the news
Main Page
In the news
6 October 2018

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑