596:
571:
538:
486:
463:
442:
421:
389:
360:
339:
281:
260:
42:
165:
If there are no objections, I'll take this review. I'll note at the outset I've had no role in editing or creating this article. I welcome other editors at any stage to contribute to this review. I will spend a day familiarising myself with the article and then provide an assessment.
635:
Have had a look at the hidden GA1 review. Most, if not all articles undergo a period of intense editing before the article is nominated and/or another period between nomination and review. Stability in a GA review refers to edit wars, so I'm sorry that the article was failed in that
647:
Here "The standard journey time to London
Paddington is 90 minutes, to Cardiff Central 40 minutes, to Birmingham New Street 75 minutes, and to Bristol Temple Meads 12 minutes." and here "CrossCountry also operate trains
684:
I will add the as-of in the "third most heavily" and "journey time" sections. I don't feel that "the line is not electrified" needs an as-of due to the presence of the rest of the sentence, but I shall add a date to
168:
While you wait, why not spare a thought for the other nominees, and conduct a review or two yourself? This provides excellent insight into the reviewing process, is enjoyable and interesting. A list can be found
47:
644:
Suggest "as of" here: "It is the third-most heavily used station in the West of
England, after Bristol Temple Meads and Bath Spa" and here "The line is not electrified" (or combine the two)
380:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
746:), we currently have a backlog of 340 items, and it means authors of articles like yourself have to wait an excruciatingly long time for a review, and every extra pair of eyes helps. --
126:
663:
Overall I thank you again for your edits to
Knowledge and hope that you continue editing such high-quality articles! I've made all the relevant changes for promotion. Best wishes, --
377:
122:
760:
I will look into learning about that tomorrow. I'm more a
Commons person usually, but I'm sure one of the articles for review will have something which piques my curiosity. -
107:
52:
742:, if I could stretch and ask you one more thing, it would be for you two to select two articles from the good article nominees list and review them (that list is here:
269:
99:
688:
I use sectors as they were specifically called sectors (intercity, regional, bulk haul, etc), and before that it was in regions (Parkway being in the
Western Region).
306:
80:
70:
555:
640:
I feel the article would be improved if these were addressed, however this article already exceeds the GA criteria, so I have marked it accordingly.
310:
302:
294:
115:
17:
584:
622:
This article is excellently written, well-sourced, and well-illustrated. I have no major issues, although do have several notes:
298:
473:
92:
75:
398:
156:
547:
559:
369:
373:
290:
551:
451:
324:
499:
430:
773:
755:
733:
712:
672:
203:
184:
160:
768:
751:
728:
707:
668:
580:
198:
180:
150:
347:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
524:
520:
528:
477:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
651:
Suggest "British Rail was split into business-led sectors in the 1980s," sectors -: -->
348:
237:
214:
762:
747:
743:
739:
722:
701:
664:
192:
176:
170:
146:
219:
If this article does not meet the criteria, explain what areas need improvement.
450:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
498:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
222:
Provide possible solutions that may (or may not) be used to fix these.
678:
That's brilliant, thankyou very much for your review and the praise.
652:
regions (sectors in business context connoting something intangible)
655:
Wikilink "Stone & Co"? (not sure if this is notable enough)
209:
Thanks for waiting. In conducting this review, I will:
134:
103:
190:
Welcome to the party. It's been a very lonely party. -
270:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
691:Stone & Co don't seem to have an article.
8:
30:
230:
61:
33:
7:
272:; spelling and grammar are correct.
18:Talk:Bristol Parkway railway station
268:. the prose is clear, concise, and
24:
173:. Knowledge needs more reviewers!
594:
569:
536:
484:
461:
440:
419:
387:
358:
337:
279:
258:
378:could reasonably be challenged
1:
774:01:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
756:00:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
734:00:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
713:00:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
673:00:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
556:valid non-free use rationales
204:10:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
185:01:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
161:01:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
595:
570:
537:
485:
462:
441:
420:
388:
359:
338:
280:
259:
213:Provide an assessment using
796:
507:
406:
349:the layout style guideline
318:
245:
232:
681:Regarding your comments:
508:
407:
319:
246:
236:
233:
583:to the topic, and have
289:. it complies with the
632:Clear and well-written
611:An excellent article
412:Broad in its coverage
502:or content dispute.
399:no original research
330:no original research
699:Again, my thanks. -
694:Dash will be added.
658:"600 space " -: -->
429:. it addresses the
376:. All content that
606:Overall assessment
552:copyright statuses
515:, if possible, by
311:list incorporation
772:
732:
711:
626:No tags on images
615:
614:
585:suitable captions
558:are provided for
202:
174:
89:
88:
787:
766:
726:
705:
598:
597:
573:
572:
560:non-free content
540:
539:
488:
487:
465:
464:
444:
443:
423:
422:
391:
390:
370:reliable sources
362:
361:
341:
340:
283:
282:
262:
261:
231:
196:
167:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
795:
794:
790:
789:
788:
786:
785:
784:
620:
293:guidelines for
291:Manual of Style
242:Review Comment
229:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
793:
791:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
697:
696:
695:
692:
689:
686:
679:
661:
660:
656:
653:
649:
645:
638:
637:
633:
630:
627:
619:
616:
613:
612:
609:
599:
591:
590:
588:
574:
566:
565:
563:
541:
533:
532:
506:
505:
503:
489:
481:
480:
478:
466:
458:
457:
455:
445:
437:
436:
434:
433:of the topic.
424:
416:
415:
405:
404:
402:
397:. it contains
392:
384:
383:
381:
363:
355:
354:
352:
342:
334:
333:
317:
316:
314:
303:words to watch
284:
276:
275:
273:
263:
255:
254:
244:
243:
240:
235:
228:
225:
224:
223:
220:
217:
207:
206:
175:Kind regards,
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
792:
775:
770:
765:
764:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
736:
735:
730:
725:
724:
719:
716:
715:
714:
709:
704:
703:
698:
693:
690:
687:
683:
682:
680:
677:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
657:
654:
650:
646:
643:
642:
641:
634:
631:
628:
625:
624:
623:
617:
610:
607:
603:
600:
593:
592:
589:
586:
582:
578:
575:
568:
567:
564:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
504:
501:
497:
493:
490:
483:
482:
479:
476:
475:
470:
467:
460:
459:
456:
453:
452:summary style
449:
446:
439:
438:
435:
432:
428:
425:
418:
417:
413:
410:
403:
400:
396:
393:
386:
385:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
357:
356:
353:
350:
346:
343:
336:
335:
331:
327:
326:
322:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:lead sections
292:
288:
285:
278:
277:
274:
271:
267:
264:
257:
256:
252:
249:
241:
239:
226:
221:
218:
216:
212:
211:
210:
205:
200:
195:
194:
189:
188:
187:
186:
182:
178:
172:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
761:
721:
717:
700:
662:
639:
629:Well-sourced
621:
605:
601:
579:. media are
576:
546:. media are
543:
516:
512:
509:
495:
491:
472:
468:
447:
431:main aspects
426:
411:
408:
394:
374:cited inline
365:
344:
329:
323:
320:
286:
265:
251:Well-written
250:
247:
208:
191:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
659:"600-space"
550:with their
513:Illustrated
104:visual edit
618:Commentary
325:Verifiable
227:Assessment
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
238:Attribute
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
763:mattbuck
748:LT910001
740:Mattbuck
723:mattbuck
702:mattbuck
665:LT910001
581:relevant
519:such as
500:edit war
193:mattbuck
177:LT910001
157:contribs
147:LT910001
76:Criteria
738:Thanks
636:regard.
474:Neutral
307:fiction
215:WP:GARC
127:history
108:history
94:Article
744:WP:GAN
554:, and
548:tagged
521:images
496:Stable
309:, and
299:layout
685:that.
529:audio
527:, or
525:video
517:media
328:with
234:Rate
136:Watch
16:<
769:Talk
752:talk
729:Talk
718:Done
708:Talk
669:talk
372:are
199:Talk
181:talk
171:here
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
720:. -
454:).
754:)
671:)
608:.
604:.
587:.
577:6b
562:.
544:6a
531::
523:,
510:6.
494:.
471:.
448:3b
427:3a
414::
409:3.
401:.
395:2c
368:.
366:2b
351:.
345:2a
332::
321:2.
313:.
305:,
301:,
297:,
287:1b
266:1a
253::
248:1.
183:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
771:)
767:(
750:(
731:)
727:(
710:)
706:(
667:(
648:"
602:7
492:5
469:4
201:)
197:(
179:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.