914:
893:
711:
819:
1134:, if Allenby said jump!, they jumped - Brits, ANZACs, Indians, it didn't matter. The rest is semantics. So yes, HM's army went to war as one big beast, it was the politicians' and administrators' job to make sure the "natives" got what they wanted in exchange for - their blood. There was very much an army of the British Empire, and exactly what you wrote here on the talk-page should be inside the article - plus a lot about how they made it work as one army when it came down to it. I don't know much about the Canadians in WWII, but if Monty said jump!, I guess they did't wait for confirmation from Ottawa either. So there you are.
760:
645:
1111:
that name until after WWII, before then it's the "New
Zealand Military Forces". The various military forces were pooled together under British command because that's what the Dominions agreed to (conscription for service abroad being an anathema and those fighting abroad being volunteers). Fighting as coalition under a primary partner similar to the US position in the Gulf War. In WWI the various nations kept their forces together and in WWII the RCAF insisted on its aircrew in UK being kept together in mostly Canadian squadrons under Canadian commanders.
1003:
982:
1013:
227:
661:
809:
788:
743:
286:
694:
629:
480:
727:
677:
567:
511:
1320:@IP49: I wasn't taking a side in whether or not he was in the British Army, but recognizing that the claim is being disputed. It's still a trivial mention.in a top-level article about the British Army. Since the addition is contested, it's.up to you to persuade others that his photo is somehow relevant, which you have yet to do.
1110:
Because it's not a word (phrase). You might refer to lower-case "imperial forces", or "British Empire armies" but there was no single entity. The
British Indian Army is Indian units from British India ("British Army in India" is used for British units). You'll notice there is no "New Zealand Army" by
1148:
The way the
Dominion, UK and Empire armed forces worked together is suitable as a topic, but article title wouldn't be "British Imperial Army" because a single entity didn't exist. I can find books called "Manpower and the Armies of the British Empire in Two World Wars" and "Armies of empire : the
1125:
Knowledge (XXG) doesn't seem to care about that. If the topic has a logical definition and is of interest, whether with upper- or lower-case title, the article is created. Or at least a paragraph. But we don't have anything. The
British Empire might have been slightly more "liberal" in its last
1095:, but what about all the others - AUS, NZ, etc.? At least during WWI they all worked as one, under British (English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish) top commanders. I am stunned that enWiki doesn't have anything at all about this. Anti-imperialism going wild and into ostrich mode?
1539:
Gurkhas are full-time regular service personnel. The distinction is that they are
Nepalese citizens rather than British citizens. I think the current wording makes it sound like they are not regulars. Would something along these lines be clearer?
668:
529:
652:
525:
1549:"As of 1 January 2024, the British Army comprises 79,228 regular full-time personnel (including 4,062 Gurkhas with Nepalese citizenship), 26,244 volunteer reserve personnel and 4,557 "other personnel", for a total of 110,029."
684:
533:
636:
521:
153:
701:
537:
1130:, see the 1920 photo, and the initial caption separated between "Indian" and "British" as if the two nations happened to have an alliance and came to Jerusalem separately, to see if they can get along. In the
1543:"As of 1 January 2024, the British Army comprises 75,166 regular full-time personnel, 4,062 regular full-time Gurkhas, 26,244 volunteer reserve personnel and 4,557 "other personnel", for a total of 110,029."
964:
767:
553:
734:
545:
718:
541:
1712:
954:
1429:
and agree with
Dormskirk's assesment. Contributions from that point have been added (and re-added) without any clear supporting refs. The page has been taken back to it's last stable version, (aka
750:
549:
930:
1597:
1533:"As of 1 January 2024, the British Army comprises 75,166 regular full-time personnel, 4,062 Gurkhas, 26,244 volunteer reserve personnel and 4,557 "other personnel", for a total of 110,029."
1707:
1536:
The reference is to the official governmental
Quarterly Service Personnel Statistics which seem to introduce a distinction between "All UK Regular personnel and all Gurkha personnel".
1477:
I was suprised, when reading this article, to see that there was no dedicated section for the many regiment’s marches (both quick and slow). Would this merit a section in this article?
1577:
921:
898:
1632:
1622:
1126:
half-century of existence, but you'd be surprised how little cohesion existed among any nation-wide army throughout history, let alone imperial juggernauts. I arrived here from
1627:
579:
1617:
1216:
It's not even a photo of him while he was in
British Army service (assuming he was). That's what I expected when I saw that a photo of him had been added to the article.
1069:
1642:
1187:
Bilcat told me to talk about this here. Idi Amin was in Uganda, which was a
British colony back then. He joined the army when it was still a part of the British Empire.
1722:
1612:
1059:
147:
1702:
1637:
865:
1607:
450:
355:
1234:
Assuming??? He was. Not assuming. He was in the
British Army, as Uganda did not have it's own military. If you look at the Infobox in his article you will see.
79:
1727:
1202:
Another editor has questioned that. Anyway, why does the photo need to be here? It's basically trivia, and he's not even mentioned elsewhere in the article.
1035:
1652:
1602:
1692:
1334:
The inclusion of the British Army in Amin's infobox was just plainly false. The KAR was not part of the regular British Army, it was a separate branch.
875:
1717:
1697:
1672:
1647:
574:
516:
1687:
1662:
710:
85:
1667:
1026:
987:
1458:
The history of the last Solider be given a medal by her own hand Queen Victoria , What did this Solder do in the Bore War to win a medal .
1394:
There seems to be a concerted attempt by several editors to add extensive unsourced information to the section on "colonial units" in breach of
1657:
315:
1682:
1592:
583:
913:
892:
44:
30:
1152:
I see no problem with an image caption referring to British and Indian because they are soldiers drawn from the British and Indian armies.
841:
1677:
1349:
1291:
1235:
1188:
818:
1582:
303:
297:
99:
1493:
1478:
1406:. The new material is currently sourced to citations which were there before and do not support the additional material added. i.e.
1091:
Every other imperial army has its own article, the British has none and isn't even mentioned on this page. Why? There is one on the
104:
20:
1459:
759:
74:
832:
793:
491:
1587:
926:
65:
1510:
I personally think that the right place for the "many regiments'" marches would be on the many different regimental pages.
168:
135:
1131:
268:
1156:
264:
198:
194:
190:
1290:
So why the Infobox in his article have this " British Army (1946-1962) " and this " United kingdom ( Until 1962 ) "?
185:
109:
1530:
Might I suggest we improve the following? (I leave the dates and tallies as they show currently, for context.)
207:
1553:
Hi - Thanks for that. I prefer the former of your two solutions as the figures match the published statistics.
644:
497:
129:
1353:
1295:
1269:
1239:
1192:
1168:
1116:
578:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1482:
1463:
1257:
272:
125:
55:
1034:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1018:
929:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
840:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
412:
393:
285:
1260:, a colonial regiment which had similar relationship to the British Army as an Indian regiment such as
70:
307:
175:
1558:
1415:
1367:
1339:
1092:
161:
1407:
1265:
1164:
1139:
1112:
1100:
212:
1562:
1515:
1501:
1436:
51:
1399:
431:
1325:
1221:
1207:
1002:
981:
226:
209:
1431:
235:
141:
1435:) and the editors involved have been enccouraged to come to the talk page and discuss. -
1403:
1554:
1411:
1363:
1335:
1031:
660:
1395:
1571:
1135:
1096:
824:
1511:
1497:
1127:
808:
787:
24:
1321:
1261:
1217:
1203:
1160:
1155:
Canada took its interests seriously because there was a political element - see
742:
726:
1008:
814:
693:
628:
263:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
211:
676:
837:
1519:
1505:
1486:
1467:
1447:
1419:
1371:
1357:
1343:
1329:
1299:
1273:
1243:
1225:
1211:
1196:
1172:
1143:
1120:
1104:
566:
510:
1163:
may be useful on how the Canadian forces fitted into the system.
1149:
9th Australian and 50th British divisions in battle, 1939-1945"
1526:
Gurkhas - implication they are not 'Regular' service personnel
1496:
themselves, or do you mean marching routine/drill procedures?
473:
221:
213:
15:
758:
741:
725:
709:
692:
675:
659:
643:
627:
939:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
1087:
British Imperial Army - not a word, let alone an article
1030:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1426:
443:
424:
405:
386:
367:
348:
1713:
Mid-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
160:
925:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
836:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
942:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
610:
174:
1598:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
1578:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English
1708:GA-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
1264:. And inclusion in this article would be Undue.
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
313:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1633:European military history task force articles
8:
1623:British military history task force articles
592:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1628:GA-Class European military history articles
1618:GA-Class British military history articles
1159:. Having heard him on a podcast, books by
1044:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United Kingdom
976:
922:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
887:
782:
607:
505:
327:
280:
239:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1643:Early Modern warfare task force articles
1525:
572:This article is within the scope of the
1723:High-importance United Kingdom articles
1613:National militaries task force articles
978:
945:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
889:
784:
507:
1703:Mid-importance London-related articles
1638:GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
582:. To use this banner, please see the
1608:GA-Class national militaries articles
595:Template:WikiProject Military history
271:, this should not be changed without
7:
1024:This article is within the scope of
919:This article is within the scope of
830:This article is within the scope of
669:European military history task force
479:
477:
1728:WikiProject United Kingdom articles
1047:Template:WikiProject United Kingdom
653:British military history task force
496:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1653:Napoleonic era task force articles
1603:GA-Class military history articles
1348:Oh uh! Can someone delete it then?
850:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject London
14:
1693:Post-Cold War task force articles
306:. If you can improve it further,
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1718:GA-Class United Kingdom articles
1698:GA-Class London-related articles
1673:World War II task force articles
1648:GA-Class Napoleonic era articles
1011:
1001:
980:
912:
891:
817:
807:
786:
565:
509:
478:
284:
225:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1688:GA-Class Post-Cold War articles
1663:World War I task force articles
1064:This article has been rated as
959:This article has been rated as
870:This article has been rated as
685:Early Modern warfare task force
1668:GA-Class World War II articles
936:Politics of the United Kingdom
927:Politics of the United Kingdom
899:Politics of the United Kingdom
637:National militaries task force
294:has been listed as one of the
1:
1658:GA-Class World War I articles
1583:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
1038:and see a list of open tasks.
933:and see a list of open tasks.
844:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1683:Cold War task force articles
1593:Old requests for peer review
1425:Have reviewed edits back to
1372:15:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1358:13:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1344:12:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1330:09:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1300:08:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1274:08:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1244:08:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1226:06:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1212:06:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1197:06:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
1173:21:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
1144:21:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
1132:Sinai and Palestine Campaign
1121:18:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
1105:13:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
575:Military history WikiProject
1506:17:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
1487:17:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
1157:Conscription Crisis of 1944
853:Template:WikiProject London
1744:
1678:GA-Class Cold War articles
1473:Anything on marching music
1070:project's importance scale
1027:WikiProject United Kingdom
965:project's importance scale
876:project's importance scale
1563:10:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
1520:01:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
1468:07:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1410:applies. Views welcome.
1063:
996:
958:
907:
869:
802:
766:
749:
733:
717:
702:Napoleonic era task force
700:
683:
667:
651:
635:
606:
598:military history articles
560:
504:
460:
330:
326:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1448:18:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
1420:21:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
768:Post-Cold War task force
1050:United Kingdom articles
856:London-related articles
735:World War II task force
611:Associated task forces:
763:
746:
730:
719:World War I task force
714:
697:
680:
664:
648:
632:
486:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1588:Warfare good articles
1258:King's African Rifles
1019:United Kingdom portal
762:
745:
729:
713:
696:
679:
663:
647:
631:
490:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
432:Guild of Copy Editors
304:good article criteria
298:Warfare good articles
100:Neutral point of view
1183:Idi Amin in the army
413:Good article nominee
394:Good article nominee
375:Good article nominee
269:relevant style guide
265:varieties of English
105:No original research
1093:British Indian Army
753:(c. 1945 – c. 1989)
751:Cold War task force
687:(c. 1500 – c. 1800)
267:. According to the
1454:British Army .
1362:I did so already.
833:WikiProject London
764:
747:
731:
715:
698:
681:
665:
649:
633:
580:list of open tasks
492:content assessment
331:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
1084:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1075:
975:
974:
971:
970:
886:
885:
882:
881:
781:
780:
777:
776:
773:
772:
584:full instructions
472:
471:
468:
467:
349:November 12, 2006
322:
279:
278:
220:
219:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1735:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1434:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1021:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1005:
998:
997:
992:
984:
977:
947:
946:
943:
940:
937:
916:
909:
908:
903:
895:
888:
858:
857:
854:
851:
848:
827:
822:
821:
811:
804:
803:
798:
790:
783:
704:(c. 1792 – 1815)
618:
608:
600:
599:
596:
593:
590:
589:Military history
569:
562:
561:
556:
517:Military history
513:
506:
489:
483:
482:
481:
474:
461:Current status:
446:
427:
408:
389:
370:
351:
328:
311:
288:
281:
232:This article is
229:
222:
214:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1568:
1567:
1528:
1475:
1456:
1443:
1440:
1437:
1430:
1392:
1185:
1089:
1066:High-importance
1049:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1039:
1017:
1012:
1010:
991:High‑importance
990:
944:
941:
938:
935:
934:
901:
855:
852:
849:
846:
845:
823:
816:
796:
616:
597:
594:
591:
588:
587:
519:
487:
442:
423:
404:
385:
366:
347:
273:broad consensus
236:British English
216:
215:
210:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1741:
1739:
1731:
1730:
1725:
1720:
1715:
1710:
1705:
1700:
1695:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1670:
1665:
1660:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1600:
1595:
1590:
1585:
1580:
1570:
1569:
1566:
1565:
1527:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1508:
1494:marching songs
1474:
1471:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1391:
1390:Colonial units
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1346:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1256:He was in the
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1229:
1228:
1214:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1153:
1150:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1062:
1056:
1055:
1053:
1041:United Kingdom
1036:the discussion
1032:United Kingdom
1023:
1022:
1006:
994:
993:
988:United Kingdom
985:
973:
972:
969:
968:
961:Mid-importance
957:
951:
950:
948:
931:the discussion
917:
905:
904:
902:Mid‑importance
896:
884:
883:
880:
879:
872:Mid-importance
868:
862:
861:
859:
842:the discussion
829:
828:
812:
800:
799:
797:Mid‑importance
791:
779:
778:
775:
774:
771:
770:
765:
755:
754:
748:
738:
737:
732:
722:
721:
716:
706:
705:
699:
689:
688:
682:
672:
671:
666:
656:
655:
650:
640:
639:
634:
624:
623:
621:
619:
613:
612:
604:
603:
601:
570:
558:
557:
538:Napoleonic era
514:
502:
501:
495:
484:
470:
469:
466:
465:
458:
457:
454:
447:
439:
438:
435:
428:
425:April 21, 2017
420:
419:
416:
409:
406:March 18, 2017
401:
400:
397:
390:
387:March 17, 2017
382:
381:
378:
371:
368:April 11, 2008
363:
362:
359:
352:
344:
343:
340:
337:
333:
332:
324:
323:
289:
277:
276:
230:
218:
217:
208:
206:
205:
202:
201:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1740:
1729:
1726:
1724:
1721:
1719:
1716:
1714:
1711:
1709:
1706:
1704:
1701:
1699:
1696:
1694:
1691:
1689:
1686:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1676:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1596:
1594:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1573:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1547:
1544:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1531:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1472:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1433:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1389:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1350:49.178.131.33
1347:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:49.178.131.33
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1266:GraemeLeggett
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1236:49.178.131.33
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:49.178.131.33
1182:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1165:GraemeLeggett
1162:
1158:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:GraemeLeggett
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1086:
1071:
1067:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1020:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1000:
999:
995:
989:
986:
983:
979:
966:
962:
956:
953:
952:
949:
932:
928:
924:
923:
918:
915:
911:
910:
906:
900:
897:
894:
890:
877:
873:
867:
864:
863:
860:
843:
839:
835:
834:
826:
825:London portal
820:
815:
813:
810:
806:
805:
801:
795:
792:
789:
785:
769:
761:
757:
756:
752:
744:
740:
739:
736:
728:
724:
723:
720:
712:
708:
707:
703:
695:
691:
690:
686:
678:
674:
673:
670:
662:
658:
657:
654:
646:
642:
641:
638:
630:
626:
625:
622:
620:
615:
614:
609:
605:
602:
585:
581:
577:
576:
571:
568:
564:
563:
559:
555:
554:Post-Cold War
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
518:
515:
512:
508:
503:
499:
493:
485:
476:
475:
464:
459:
455:
453:
452:
448:
445:
441:
440:
436:
434:
433:
429:
426:
422:
421:
417:
415:
414:
410:
407:
403:
402:
398:
396:
395:
391:
388:
384:
383:
379:
377:
376:
372:
369:
365:
364:
360:
358:
357:
353:
350:
346:
345:
341:
338:
335:
334:
329:
325:
320:
318:
317:
309:
305:
301:
300:
299:
293:
290:
287:
283:
282:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
231:
228:
224:
223:
204:
203:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1548:
1545:
1542:
1538:
1535:
1532:
1529:
1476:
1457:
1393:
1186:
1090:
1065:
1025:
960:
920:
871:
831:
573:
546:World War II
534:Early Modern
498:WikiProjects
463:Good article
462:
449:
444:May 24, 2017
430:
411:
392:
374:
373:
354:
314:
312:
308:please do so
296:
295:
292:British Army
291:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
233:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:British Army
19:This is the
1479:82.2.122.20
1427:16 May 2022
1262:8th Rajputs
1161:Marc Milner
1128:Lions' Gate
542:World War I
451:Peer review
356:Peer review
234:written in
148:free images
31:not a forum
1572:Categories
1492:As in the
1460:49.3.81.66
437:Copyedited
399:Not listed
380:Not listed
302:under the
1555:Dormskirk
1412:Dormskirk
1408:WP:HIJACK
1364:Applodion
1336:Applodion
245:travelled
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1136:Arminden
1097:Arminden
550:Cold War
530:European
522:National
488:GA-class
456:Reviewed
361:Reviewed
316:reassess
257:artefact
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1512:TomboPC
1498:Synorem
1400:WP:CITE
1068:on the
963:on the
874:on the
526:British
339:Process
261:analyse
253:defence
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1432:WP:QUO
1322:BilCat
1218:BilCat
1204:BilCat
847:London
838:London
794:London
494:scale.
418:Listed
342:Result
249:centre
241:colour
126:Google
1404:WP:RS
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1559:talk
1516:talk
1502:talk
1483:talk
1464:talk
1416:talk
1402:and
1396:WP:V
1368:talk
1354:talk
1340:talk
1326:talk
1296:talk
1270:talk
1240:talk
1222:talk
1208:talk
1193:talk
1169:talk
1140:talk
1117:talk
1101:talk
1060:High
336:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1546:or
955:Mid
866:Mid
176:TWL
1574::
1561:)
1518:)
1504:)
1485:)
1466:)
1444:lf
1418:)
1398:,
1370:)
1356:)
1342:)
1328:)
1298:)
1272:)
1242:)
1224:)
1210:)
1195:)
1171:)
1142:)
1119:)
1103:)
617:/
552:/
548:/
544:/
540:/
536:/
532:/
528:/
524:/
520::
319:it
310:.
259:,
255:,
251:,
247:,
243:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
1557:(
1514:(
1500:(
1481:(
1462:(
1441:o
1438:w
1414:(
1366:(
1352:(
1338:(
1324:(
1294:(
1268:(
1238:(
1220:(
1206:(
1191:(
1167:(
1138:(
1115:(
1099:(
1072:.
967:.
878:.
586:.
500::
321:.
275:.
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
