845:
obvious. It C60 doesn't have a melting point at standard pressure it might have a sublimation point (it might not have an observable sublimation point if too rapid decomposition happens at too low a temperature), then that is, by definition, the temperature at which the vapor pressure of C60 reaches 1 atmosphere. The 600 K probably were a reference to the temperature at which sublimation of C60 in some laboratory setting becomes observable. This is obviously not some special temperature because it depends on the equipment of the laboratory. Vapor pressure is far below 1 atmosphere at that point. I searched for a citation-worthy reference and provided values for the vapor pressure at 2 temperatures.
557:
266:"... carbon atom at each vertex"Â ; Although this style of illustration is a useful convention of long standing, & uncontroversial, I am fairly confident that the 'bond' or 'interaction field' between the atoms is by most understanding, larger, and reaches out further from the vacuum centroid of the molecule, than the atoms at the vertices of their bonds. I believe that if visualized by VHR FM, most Buckminsterfullerene (like most Fullerenes/Bucky-balls and tubes) would look like grossly over-stuffed upholstered structures, with the atoms(upholstery buttons) deeply embedded in the 'poofy' projecting bond structure fields.
31:
85:
64:
22:
474:. There are no homeopathic claims being made in our article, but I think it is a little uncomfortable that all the references (except one dead link) are authored by the alleged scammer. I really don't know much about this subject, but it needs looking at by someone who does. An independent reference verifying that the substance actually exists would be a good start.
1059:
972:
In the introduction, it said each carbon atom made 2 sigma bonds but I think it actually made 3. Also, the caption under the picture with the magnetic balls says it's demonstrating the carbon atoms. Actually, it's the same number of magnetic balls but they're not in the same arrangement as the carbon
844:
I removed "sublimates at ~ 600 K" from the melting point field because it's really misplaced. This is neither a melting point nor a sublimation point. If C60 has a melting point at standard pressure (and standard pressure is always implied if you don't say otherwise), then it's higher, I think that's
888:
that was not a redirect described the structure as a soccer ball. I believe that "soccer ball" is unambiguous in many varieties of
English. All soccer balls are footballs, but not all footballs are soccer balls. Before turning this into a candidate for one of the lamest edit wars ever, I'd like to
671:
At the bottom of the history section, under 'Emerging
Developments', I find citations 26 and 27 in particular highly dubious. While claiming a combination of buckminsterfullerene and olive oil increased rat lifespans, it also links to a site selling $ 45 bottles of the self-same oil. This is
864:
The "Preparation" section says "It was first generated in 1984 by Eric
Rohlfing, Donald Cox and Andrew Kaldor using a laser to vaporize carbon in a supersonic helium beam. In 1985 their work was repeated by Harold Kroto, James R. Heath, Sean O'Brien, Robert Curl, and Richard Smalley at Rice
618:
out of Rice
University on C-20's ability to aid in carbon capture. I'm not sure how relevant that is or if the source is good enough because chemistry is really not my field. It sounds promising, though, so can someone more knowledgable check it out and add it if it deserves adding?
758:
567:
discusses the growth of
Buckminsterfullerene and gives some related measurements. I've uploaded one of the figures to Commons in case it is useful for this or a related article, but I'll leave that decision to the article's contributors.
573:
Bommel, S.; Kleppmann, N.; Weber, C.; Spranger, H.; Schäfer, P.; Novak, J.; Roth, S.V.; Schreiber, F.; Klapp, S.H.L.; Kowarik, S. (5 November 2014). "Unravelling the multilayer growth of the fullerene C60 in real time".
759:
http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN&node_id=924&content_id=CNBP_025863&use_sec=true&sec_url_var=region1&__uuid=9eeaf30e-43eb-4ccd-b4f1-f598dfde775a
509:
Homeopathy is not an issue here (many valid chemicals have been abused in this sense). The question is whether there is an independent confirmation of the hydrated complex, not by
Andrievsky or his collaborators.
413:
I don't know how much information is available, but if there is any, I think it would be a useful addition. Surely there must be at least some basic information on acute toxicity; someone must have studied that.
1153:
524:
There are a cpouple of indipendent papers (10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.053 and 10.1021/es048099n) As well as a section in a review paper (10.1021/cr3005026). It also has a CAS no of 209343-51-1 (for C
1111:
679:
35:
197:
I think the picture of buckmisterfullerene in benzene should be removed because it's completely useless. It looks no different than colored water in a beaker, and adds no value to this page
912:
is the subject of 37492 publications, 15705 have been published in the past 10 years. It looks to be about 3-5 reports per day (a measly 900 papers appeared in 2019). We are firmly into
362:
page, although the fact the chemical formula of
Buckminmsterfullerene is so complex does form part of the reason the problem occurs on this page. Even with Javascript enabled, if the
1143:
992:
History section needs cleanup. Paragraphs 3+4 are rewording (longer) version of first paragraph. Paragraph three (discovered 1985) contradicts first paragraph (generated in 1984).
171:
which suggests that buckministerfullerene is no longer the largest particle to exhibit wave-particle duality. I'd want a better source though before I go changing the article.
950:
1158:
744:
702:, from researchers apparently not connected to Moussa or his associates. In my opinion, we shouldn't leave it in without at least mentioning some of the criticism.
786:
782:
768:
436:. However, I haven't had the patience to do in-depth reading to what the state of affairs is here, and the only seemingly credible paper on the subject is this:
672:
tantamount to advertising and doesn't really belong on wikipedia, even if it is true. Needless to say, I doubt the veracity of the citation in its entirety.
288:
884:
An anonymous editor or editors from various
Swedish IP's have been edit-warring over how to describe the molecular structure for two or three days now. The
865:
University, who recognized the structure of C60 as buckminsterfullerine". But the "History" section does not mention that 1984 result. Is that correct? --
1168:
135:
145:
1138:
470:
The hydrated fullerene section was recently removed by an IP editor as a scam and then restored. There is certainly an alleged scam going on, see
1148:
556:
339:
1163:
374:
page where the chemical formula is sufficiently complex, the same problem rears its head: The table/template becomes unmanageably wide.
1115:
1097:
754:
683:
653:
375:
214:
764:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
697:
for instance), some going as far as accussing him of a scam. Against that, there are papers, perhaps with less spectacular claims,
178:
745:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120925173349/http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/pdfs/hydrogen_storage_novel_organometallic_buckyballs.pdf
433:
1133:
111:
100:
93:
69:
748:
958:
829:
44:
515:
471:
394:
The structure including C-C distance, pyramidalization, C-C-C angles, and packing, pretty basic stuff, is missing. --
1007:
943:
695:
894:
785:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
624:
537:
343:
939:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
954:
820:
736:
708:
600:
480:
379:
182:
168:
1101:
1046:
978:
870:
732:
657:
511:
465:
218:
1090:
850:
804:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
792:
50:
973:
atoms in a buckyball. The one made of magnets has triangular and square faces but not hexagonal faces.
735:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
995:
890:
728:
675:
359:
335:
174:
700:
21:
1071:
925:
913:
755:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121029023510/http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true
620:
533:
500:
449:
437:
429:
419:
399:
917:
703:
615:
596:
475:
306:
273:
249:
233:
106:
789:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
805:
1042:
974:
866:
434:
http://extremelongevity.net/2012/04/16/chronic-buckyball-administration-doubles-rat-lifespan/
1038:
846:
583:
355:
812:
1041:”. The quoted text looks like it says carbon disulfide is aromatic as well, but it isn’t.
492:
698:
1067:
1003:
921:
771:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
649:
496:
495:: the same authors on several papers in mainly narrow journals. I would remove it. --
445:
415:
395:
811:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
749:
http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/pdfs/hydrogen_storage_novel_organometallic_buckyballs.pdf
1127:
935:
A Commons file used on this page or its
Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
694:
There has been a lot of criticism of Moussa's paper and methods on the internet (see
302:
269:
245:
229:
778:
1119:
1105:
1075:
1050:
1011:
982:
962:
929:
898:
874:
854:
834:
713:
687:
661:
628:
604:
541:
519:
504:
485:
453:
423:
403:
383:
347:
319:
310:
295:
277:
253:
237:
222:
186:
777:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
999:
645:
316:
292:
84:
63:
242:
Can you share your source/authority for this format & capitalization?
442:
Hopefully, this paper trail will inspire somebody to do better digging.
1034:
587:
363:
555:
367:
228:
It is written as one unhyphenated word, buckminsterfullerene. --
438:
http://extremelongevity.net/wp-content/uploads/C60-Fullerene.pdf
430:
http://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/57492-c60-experiments-home/
1033:“Fullerenes are sparingly soluble in aromatic solvents such as
15:
332:
The table on this page is broken on firefox with noscript.
904:
37492 publications, reports, patents and counting (11/2019)
739:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
428:
There's this forum discussion on C60's effects on humans:
110:. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
885:
636:
289:
Commons:File talk:Buckminsterfullerene-2D-skeletal.png
1154:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
1086:"theoretically every object exhibits this behaviour"
213:
Is it Buckminster-fullerene or Buckminsterfullerene?
205:
How is buckminsterfullerene manufactured/created? ~~
781:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1091:Wave-particle duality#Wave nature of large objects
104:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
949:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
767:This message was posted before February 2018.
1144:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences
301:I don't think so. I left a reply there. --
8:
1159:B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
673:
58:
727:I have just modified 2 external links on
60:
19:
1112:2407:5200:400:9C0B:E9F2:2310:869A:CE52
680:2601:283:8202:505F:55D0:FD8C:6D3B:EEC3
7:
432:and this article seems interesting:
358:and technically not specific to the
354:This is actually a problem with the
90:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
1169:High-importance chemicals articles
908:According to Chemical Abstracts, C
14:
1089:This is directly contradicted by
731:. Please take a moment to review
167:FYI to anyone editing this page-
1139:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1057:
83:
62:
29:
20:
169:Wired released an article today
140:This article has been rated as
120:Knowledge:WikiProject Chemicals
1149:B-Class level-5 vital articles
886:first revision of this article
563:A recent open-access paper in
123:Template:WikiProject Chemicals
1:
1012:22:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
988:Repetition in History section
963:22:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
899:14:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
855:23:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
605:17:53, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
542:10:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
1106:13:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
1076:18:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
1051:18:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
930:14:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
860:Kroto 1985 or Rohlfing 1984?
835:17:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
662:09:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
629:00:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
610:Buckyballs in Carbon Capture
520:11:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
505:11:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
491:Looks like hype or at least
486:10:43, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
424:00:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
370:entry links are clicked on
348:05:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
1110:Automobile"making section"
1096:Which article is false? --
1093:("theoretically unclear").
114:for details on the project.
1185:
1164:B-Class chemicals articles
1120:23:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
798:(last update: 5 June 2024)
724:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
714:18:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
688:16:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
409:Effect on living organisms
404:01:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
384:23:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
320:15:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
311:14:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
296:13:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
238:11:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
223:08:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
187:03:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
146:project's importance scale
983:18:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
875:16:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
648:is under discussion, see
278:13:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
254:13:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
139:
78:
57:
880:Football or soccer ball?
454:04:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
98:, a daughter project of
916:and more realistically
720:External links modified
459:Hydrated fullerene scam
1134:B-Class vital articles
560:
283:Isolated Pentagon Rule
968:2 mistakes in article
614:Science Daily posted
576:Nature Communications
565:Nature Communications
559:
163:Emerging Developments
101:WikiProject Chemistry
94:WikiProject Chemicals
36:level-5 vital article
1082:Section "Properties"
889:see a few comments.
779:regular verification
729:Buckminsterfullerene
360:Buckminsterfullerene
944:Richard Smalley.jpg
769:After February 2018
287:Is the argument on
955:Community Tech bot
823:InternetArchiveBot
774:InternetArchiveBot
588:10.1038/ncomms6388
561:
262:Visual Description
126:chemicals articles
45:content assessment
998:comment added by
799:
690:
678:comment added by
512:Materialscientist
466:Materialscientist
338:comment added by
177:comment added by
160:
159:
156:
155:
152:
151:
1176:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1039:carbon disulfide
1028:
1027:
1026:
1014:
833:
824:
797:
796:
775:
667:Dubious Citation
639:
591:
469:
356:Chembox template
350:
291:really valid? --
189:
128:
127:
124:
121:
118:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1124:
1123:
1084:
1058:
1056:
1031:
1029:and aromaticity
1025:
1021:
1020:
1018:
993:
990:
970:
951:nomination page
937:
911:
906:
891:Just plain Bill
882:
862:
842:
827:
822:
790:
783:have permission
773:
737:this simple FaQ
722:
669:
642:
635:
612:
572:
554:
531:
527:
463:
461:
411:
392:
333:
330:
285:
264:
211:
203:
195:
172:
165:
142:High-importance
125:
122:
119:
116:
115:
73:High‑importance
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1182:
1180:
1172:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1126:
1125:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1030:
1023:
1022:
1016:
989:
986:
969:
966:
947:
946:
936:
933:
909:
905:
902:
881:
878:
861:
858:
841:
838:
817:
816:
809:
762:
761:
753:Added archive
751:
743:Added archive
721:
718:
717:
716:
668:
665:
650:talk:buckyball
641:
632:
621:Guyinasuit5517
611:
608:
595:
593:
592:
553:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
534:Project Osprey
529:
525:
460:
457:
410:
407:
391:
388:
387:
386:
340:193.219.187.22
329:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
284:
281:
267:
263:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
243:
210:
207:
202:
199:
194:
191:
164:
161:
158:
157:
154:
153:
150:
149:
138:
132:
131:
129:
88:
76:
75:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1181:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1094:
1092:
1087:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1064:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1017:
1015:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
987:
985:
984:
980:
976:
967:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
945:
942:
941:
940:
934:
932:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
903:
901:
900:
896:
892:
887:
879:
877:
876:
872:
868:
859:
857:
856:
852:
848:
840:Melting point
839:
837:
836:
831:
826:
825:
814:
810:
807:
803:
802:
801:
794:
788:
784:
780:
776:
770:
765:
760:
756:
752:
750:
746:
742:
741:
740:
738:
734:
730:
725:
719:
715:
712:
711:
707:
706:
701:
699:
696:
693:
692:
691:
689:
685:
681:
677:
666:
664:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
644:The usage of
638:
633:
631:
630:
626:
622:
617:
609:
607:
606:
602:
598:
597:MartinPoulter
589:
585:
581:
577:
571:
570:
569:
566:
558:
551:
543:
539:
535:
523:
522:
521:
517:
513:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
484:
483:
479:
478:
473:
467:
458:
456:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:
421:
417:
408:
406:
405:
401:
397:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
351:
349:
345:
341:
337:
328:No javascript
327:
321:
318:
315:Thank you. --
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
290:
282:
280:
279:
275:
271:
261:
255:
251:
247:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
208:
206:
201:Manufacturing
200:
198:
192:
190:
188:
184:
180:
176:
170:
162:
147:
143:
137:
134:
133:
130:
113:
109:
108:
103:
102:
97:
96:
95:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1109:
1098:84.189.84.17
1095:
1088:
1085:
1062:
1043:Alfa-ketosav
1032:
994:— Preceding
991:
975:Blackbombchu
971:
948:
938:
920:territory!--
914:WP:SECONDARY
907:
883:
867:Jorge Stolfi
863:
843:
821:
818:
793:source check
772:
766:
763:
726:
723:
709:
704:
674:— Preceding
670:
654:65.94.40.137
643:
613:
594:
579:
575:
564:
562:
481:
476:
472:this gsearch
462:
444:
441:
427:
412:
393:
376:82.219.197.3
371:
334:— Preceding
331:
286:
265:
215:87.224.36.90
212:
204:
196:
173:— Preceding
166:
141:
112:project page
105:
99:
92:
91:
51:WikiProjects
34:
918:WP:TERTIARY
847:Icek~enwiki
179:24.99.7.132
1128:Categories
830:Report bug
616:an article
390:Structure?
1068:Smokefoot
922:Smokefoot
813:this tool
806:this tool
646:Buckyball
637:Buckyball
552:New image
497:Smokefoot
446:TheJackal
416:Trovatore
396:Smokefoot
117:Chemicals
107:chemicals
70:Chemicals
39:is rated
1008:contribs
996:unsigned
819:Cheers.—
705:Spinning
676:unsigned
582:: 5388.
493:WP:UNDUE
477:Spinning
336:unsigned
307:Edgar181
270:Wikidity
246:Wikidity
234:Edgar181
175:unsigned
1035:toluene
733:my edit
193:Picture
144:on the
41:B-class
364:SMILES
47:scale.
710:Spark
528:. x H
482:Spark
368:InChI
28:This
1116:talk
1102:talk
1072:talk
1063:Done
1047:talk
1037:and
1004:talk
1000:Fbax
979:talk
959:talk
926:talk
895:talk
871:talk
851:talk
684:talk
658:talk
625:talk
601:talk
538:talk
532:O).
516:talk
501:talk
450:talk
420:talk
400:talk
380:talk
344:talk
317:Leyo
293:Leyo
274:talk
250:talk
219:talk
209:Name
183:talk
136:High
953:. —
787:RfC
757:to
747:to
652:--
584:doi
372:any
366:or
1130::
1118:)
1104:)
1074:)
1066:--
1049:)
1019:CS
1010:)
1006:•
981:)
961:)
928:)
910:60
897:)
873:)
853:)
800:.
795:}}
791:{{
686:)
660:)
627:)
603:)
578:.
540:)
526:60
518:)
503:)
452:)
422:)
414:--
402:)
382:)
346:)
309:)
303:Ed
276:)
268:--
252:)
244:--
236:)
230:Ed
221:)
185:)
1114:(
1100:(
1070:(
1045:(
1024:2
1002:(
977:(
957:(
924:(
893:(
869:(
849:(
832:)
828:(
815:.
808:.
682:(
656:(
640:"
634:"
623:(
599:(
590:.
586::
580:5
536:(
530:2
514:(
499:(
468::
464:@
448:(
418:(
398:(
378:(
342:(
305:(
272:(
248:(
232:(
217:(
181:(
148:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
