Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Gautam (clan)

Source 📝

210: 50: 190: 112: 81: 122: 21: 360:
and from what I could see from the snippet view - the source is saying that "Cunningham's theory is totally dismissed" because he assumed the connection based on Gautam gotra. However, the source says that Brahmins also have this gotra. Hence the source concludes his theory of connection with Rajputs
245: 246:
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Cc2HyXP5dygC&pg=PA105&dq=nikumbh++clan&hl=en&ei=KgKkTaLHJYHYuAPyifGDCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=nikumbh%20%20clan&f=false
456: 436: 421: 451: 31: 461: 446: 431: 180: 416: 170: 219: 95: 260: 466: 441: 426: 411: 256: 61: 383:
is vandalised continuously by someone who is closely related to the subject. But no worry I reported them.Happy Diwali btw.🪔
199: 145: 135: 91: 86: 27: 264: 67: 49: 361:
is invalid. So the source that is cited is also not supporting this theory by a Raj era non-Historian.
388: 353: 337: 302: 20: 366: 323: 357: 384: 349: 333: 315: 298: 280: 362: 319: 294: 209: 405: 380: 127: 117: 189: 111: 80: 352:. I will put a belated happy Diwali on your talk page..sorry :-) . BTW, 392: 370: 341: 327: 306: 268: 143:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 140: 43: 15: 318:. Sure, I will look at the edit. BTW, Belated Happy Diwali. 297:
would u like to see whether my recent edit is useful or not?
208: 188: 457:
Start-Class Uttar Pradesh articles of Unknown-importance
139:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 281:
http://rajputsamaj.org/downloads/Rajput%20History.pdf
437:Start-Class Bihar articles of Unknown-importance 285:Aryan Siddharth Singh Gautam Bemahari Basti UP 259:which I removed and placed here for analysis: 242:Handbook on Rajputs By A. H. Bingley-page-82 8: 422:Start-Class India articles of Low-importance 47: 356:was an engineer who died in 1893 - so not 332:I was shocked to see u didn't wished me.😁 75: 452:Unknown-importance Uttar Pradesh articles 77: 7: 133:This article is within the scope of 379:I was right to remove that. Btw ur 274:The above mention fact is not true. 257:Special:Contributions/221.135.243.5 66:It is of interest to the following 462:WikiProject Uttar Pradesh articles 447:Start-Class Uttar Pradesh articles 30:on 17 October 2017. The result of 14: 432:Unknown-importance Bihar articles 155:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 120: 110: 79: 48: 19: 175:This article has been rated as 26:This article was nominated for 1: 417:Low-importance India articles 393:16:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 371:16:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 342:16:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 328:16:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 307:12:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 255:Comments added to article by 217:This article is supported by 197:This article is supported by 290:Related to Shakya dynasty?? 251:Comment removed from article 483: 467:WikiProject India articles 442:WikiProject Bihar articles 427:Start-Class Bihar articles 412:Start-Class India articles 269:03:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 181:project's importance scale 158:Template:WikiProject India 238:for gautam rajput history 220:WikiProject Uttar Pradesh 216: 196: 174: 105: 74: 213: 193: 56:This article is rated 212: 192: 60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 354:Alexander_Cunningham 214: 194: 62:content assessment 235: 234: 231: 230: 227: 226: 200:WikiProject Bihar 136:WikiProject India 42: 41: 474: 163: 162: 159: 156: 153: 130: 125: 124: 123: 114: 107: 106: 101: 98: 83: 76: 59: 53: 52: 44: 23: 16: 482: 481: 477: 476: 475: 473: 472: 471: 402: 401: 292: 253: 240: 160: 157: 154: 151: 150: 126: 121: 119: 99: 89: 57: 12: 11: 5: 480: 478: 470: 469: 464: 459: 454: 449: 444: 439: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 404: 403: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 291: 288: 287: 286: 283: 278: 275: 261:174.109.208.72 252: 249: 239: 236: 233: 232: 229: 228: 225: 224: 215: 205: 204: 195: 185: 184: 177:Low-importance 173: 167: 166: 164: 161:India articles 132: 131: 115: 103: 102: 100:Low‑importance 84: 72: 71: 65: 54: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 479: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 409: 407: 394: 390: 386: 382: 381:Rajputization 378: 372: 368: 364: 359: 355: 351: 348:My apologies 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 339: 335: 331: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 304: 300: 296: 289: 284: 282: 279: 276: 273: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 250: 248: 247: 243: 237: 222: 221: 211: 207: 206: 202: 201: 191: 187: 186: 182: 178: 172: 169: 168: 165: 148: 147: 142: 138: 137: 129: 118: 116: 113: 109: 108: 104: 97: 96:Uttar Pradesh 93: 88: 85: 82: 78: 73: 69: 63: 55: 51: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 293: 277:Please refer 254: 244: 241: 218: 198: 176: 146:project page 144: 134: 128:India portal 68:WikiProjects 35: 58:Start-class 406:Categories 385:Heba Aisha 350:Heba Aisha 334:Heba Aisha 316:Heba Aisha 299:Heba Aisha 363:LukeEmily 358:WP:HISTRS 320:LukeEmily 295:LukeEmily 28:deletion 179:on the 64:scale. 152:India 141:India 92:Bihar 87:India 389:talk 367:talk 338:talk 324:talk 303:talk 265:talk 36:keep 34:was 314:Hi 171:Low 408:: 391:) 369:) 340:) 326:) 305:) 267:) 94:/ 90:: 387:( 365:( 336:( 322:( 301:( 263:( 223:. 203:. 183:. 149:. 70:: 38:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
India
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Bihar
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Uttar Pradesh
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Cc2HyXP5dygC&pg=PA105&dq=nikumbh++clan&hl=en&ei=KgKkTaLHJYHYuAPyifGDCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=nikumbh%20%20clan&f=false
Special:Contributions/221.135.243.5
174.109.208.72
talk
03:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
http://rajputsamaj.org/downloads/Rajput%20History.pdf
LukeEmily
Heba Aisha
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.