Talk:Gender/Archive 6

566:

location. Perhaps it might belong somewhere in a section about historical sex-based discrimination, but this is not that place. This entire thing is a mockery of a rather simple issue; gender is almost exclusively, although not always, based on sex. Now, there are people that are transgender, and they should be given treatment to fit within the sex that they identify with, but having sections on so many genders that are backed by exactly no scientific evidence is a disgrace to Knowledge. Sure, maybe this sort of content could be placed into a section in sociology, and the connections between sexuality and culture. I would be willing to go along with that. However, as a result of the way that this article is formed, I must state that the quality, accuracy, and NPOV within this article are poor at best, and nonexistent at worst. Gender is only the cultural manifestation of sex; having more than maybe 6 (for different sexualities), max, is simply caving in to forces that see gender as personality, not a result of sexuality. Redirecting to biological sex may be a good idea; although I'm frankly not certain that it would work with the Knowledge community at large, considering the environment of Knowledge. As a clarifying measure, I would like to state that this is not in any way directed against those of whom are gay, lesbian, transgender/transsexual, or asexual. Those are legitimate categories, and members of such deserve to be recognized in their own right. This section is a disgrace, not only to Knowledge but actual LGBT communities, as thorough the creation of dozens of labels that have little meaning delegitimizes them in the eyes of many, and their causes are therefore often placed into question as a result. In this way, it is of the utmost importance that this article, and the section that surrounds it, is reformed, as Knowledge holds a great deal of cultural weight, especially in relation to controversial topics.

1197:," which, although varying by culture, have common characteristics when it comes to what role men have had and what role women have had. My issue with what you added is what I stated above. Your response does not address those issues. Also, your text makes it seem like the gender binary isn't the standard and that it's just those specific cultures it exists in. Like I stated, the gender binary is the standard worldwide. And it typically comes with gendered pronouns. And the lead already addresses the hijra aspect by stating, "Some cultures have specific gender roles that are distinct from 'man' and 'woman,' such as the hijras of South Asia. These are often referred to as third genders." As for -sche's proposal, maybe it's leaving out the pronoun aspect? That would work. I also notice that it states "identify as exclusively men or women." I need to see a clearer proposal. Alternatively, we could change "traditionally" to "typically." And "typically" still gets across how dominant the gender binary is (and also makes it clear that the gender binary is not just a traditional matter, but also a current matter), while covering the minority who may identify as men or women or use masculine or feminine gender pronouns while also being non-binary. By that latter aspect, I mean the non-binary people who identify as both a man and a woman or as in between, or as a man or a woman occasionally, and/or use masculine or feminine pronouns. Or maybe we should just drop "traditionally" and leave the matter at that since identifying as a man or a woman or using masculine or feminine gender pronouns is within the gender binary. Flyer22 Reborn|Flyer22 Reborn]] ( 111:

genderqueer/gender queer, gender non-binary only as topics and in general only appearing in literature, including non-academic literature, with a frequency of 0.000000027% up until present, with no reference to 'gender' being a spectrum until the late 90's (1998 to be precise is the earliest reference in literature) and it not being a topic of contention until the cultural Marxist movements of the late 10's. Until present gender is expressed as 'the state of being male or female' in almost all dictionaries, irrespective of the frequency of use in popular culture by millennials it still remains the ever present normative function within our laboratories and classrooms within the STEM industries I have worked in. I understand that Knowledge has a very overt bias these days, and it has come to pass that it's neutrality has gone out the window - but I am asking that those who are in positions of power here who abuse that power to force an ideology across at least PRETEND to be neutral and not have 90% of the article address 0.05% of the worlds population. I miss being able to cite wikipedia as a good starting point for further investigation to students, it used to be such a good resource.

4158:" and that is the point that is trying to be conveyed by that sentence - that it isn't as cut and dried as classic female (XX) and classic male (XY), which is what would be implied to the reader with a removal of the term "intersex" from the sentence. I fail to see how whether or not a particular intersex condition is serious, requires treatment, and/or causes other problems is relevant to whether or not the wholesale removal of the term "intersex" from this article (or any other article) is appropriate. I understand your concern that leaving the text as is might make the reader think there are three biological sexes, but removing it swings the pendulum too far the other way. Can you propose some wording that: 1) alleviates your concern that the reader might think intersex is a third sex; and 2) ensures that the reader is aware that there are, in fact, some complications in the subject matter? 2161:-sche, (whom l will not ping again here), stated that s/he was making edits based on conjecture on what another user wrote, l quote: "rewriting it so that it actually said that a binary was typical, since that is apparently what it was intended to say (but not what it actually said)". Really? No problems with that but l am misunderstanding the guidelines by asking for a source? The obvious thing to do is asking the user making the original edit what the user meant. That's also part of the guidelines. There are drastic differences in these edits than the content that was originally being disputed, which was, as stated in the beginning of this discussion, qualification of what was already there. l know that there is a minimal change guideline. That is why l was requesting more support information in regards to -sche's editing. 2379:(e/c; @Mathglot) To be clear, my position is the opposite of what you say you agree with me on, "about the gender binary being found universally in every culture in the world" (and about that being obvious): I argue(d) this is not BLUESKY-level obvious, and if push comes to shove, is not even verifiable. (Indeed, to push things further, it's falsifiable; scholars of at least a couple African societies have said that, prior to European colonization, they did not have genders, even without touching on the societies which had more than two.) However, I'm not suggesting that it's necessary to specifically mention those unusual societies, as I think the current generalist reference(s) and the statement they support, that a binary is found in "most" and/or "many" societies, is sufficient. 1572:, -sche, I'm not keen on "many if not most societies." But I think it works better with the "historically" aspect than with the "currently" aspect since the "historical" commentary is speaking of a time when non-binary genders didn't exist or generally didn't exist. That they exist in more places today than they used to doesn't mean that the gender binary isn't still dominant. We see just how dominant it is every day. For the lead, I'd just go with "most" per the Nadal source. And I'd cite it in the lead since other things are cited in the lead and this is a contentious topic. It's not as contentious as a lot of other topics, but it's contentions nevertheless. 141:

sexual identity and I'm fine with that, but a gay is male and a lesbian is female, PERIOD! But when it comes to genders, the FACTS are simple: TWO is the magic word or if you prefer 2 is the magic number. Gender applies to the whole nature too, on the flora we got male and female gender on the same plant, on the fauna we have, again: 2 genders. Accept FACTS and forget that nonsense you are preaching. But if you want to identify as an ATTACK HELICOPTER, I can certainly respect that, it's in fact the only "gender identity" I can accept because it show how ridiculous those "feelings" are, gender are characteristics, not feelings, FACTS not feelings!--

2757:. I did not. I explained in the edit summaries. I did not see any need to discuss anything further with you. I told you that the vast majority of the world adheres to a gender binary. That is not a bias of mine. It is a fact. And the Nadal source is clear that "Most cultures currently construct their societies based on the understanding of gender binary." It should state "the vast majority." But anyway. As for a non-authoritative or non-reliable source, you don't get to decide to what is a non-authoritative or non-reliable source. And sometimes even when a source is authoritative, it doesn't mean its voice gets to be stated in 213:'s original comment. As someone who has worked in the human factors field for the past 10+ years... I've actually seen the change happen. Certain politically motivated groups have tried to rewrite history and make it seem as if the gender/sex difference has been the "consensus" since the 1950s. It hasn't, nor is it even now. It only started to become an issue in the past 3-5 years or so. Before that, the terms "gender" and "sex" were linguistically equivalent and used interchangeably by the vast majority of the population. 1510:), page 184, says "Historically, in many, if not most, cultures, gender traditionally has been conceived as binary, but the modern and preferred understanding is that gender actually occurs on a spectrum.") I've now added those references to the body, tweaking the wording to one that they support. I also added the word 'binary' to that section of the body (previously, it was only mentioned in the lead!), and replaced the use of 'traditionally' in the body, per the discussion above about the problems with that word. 1473:

wrote the original wording, assuming that they meant to say something accurate though they did it badly; strictly speaking, however, we do not need to know their motive, because their wording was inaccurate and had to be changed regardless. If you think the wording needs to be changed still further, please propose better wording. :) However, verbiage about languages traditionally using or not using gendered pronouns is probably not worth mentioning in the lead (hence my edit removed the disputed mention that

4013:, my understanding is that the objective is to differentiate the fact that there are other combinations of chromosomes besides XX and XY, which the layperson (reader) would call "female" and "male", respectively. That is to say, when the layperson reads "male", they think of XY chromosomes and when they read "female", they think of XX. For the reader, intersex needs to be included as an umbrella term for everything that isn't XX or XY. I'm open to hearing other wording for that sentence besides 4641:

natural sciences investigates whether biological differences in males and females influence the development of gender in humans; both inform debate about how far biological differences influence the formation of gender identity. In some English literature, there is also a trichotomy between biological sex, psychological gender, and social gender role." It doesn't seem like it takes a hard position is taken for the social construct conception of gender.

31: 2485:

not mind adding those, but I am not proposing that any changes are actually necessary at this point.) If I have more time I will look into what proportion of sources say the few African societies I mentioned did vs did not have genders at specific times prior to European contact, and consider whether to propose a sentence about them in the article body (though I would try to expand the main articles first).

2866: 490: 409: 1767:" performed specific functions in civilizations across the globe for varying amounts of time. To name a few specific cultures: for more than 1000 years in the imperial courts of China, Korea & Vietnam; India; Thailand; Incan Culture. The descendants of these cultures already make up about 35%-40% of the current world population. That's before examining Greco Roman and African cultures. 1083:, the wording is odd (to me anyway), and it's not needed. "Traditionally" works fine. Further, your text is focused on gender pronouns, but the sentence is focused on "people who identify as men or women" and those who "use masculine or feminine gender pronouns." Are you suggesting that there are no genders and there is no gender binary in "cultures where there are no gender pronouns"? 2663:

academic historical studies, anthropology, sociology, etc. A physician in North America is not an expert or authority on what happens in most societies. There were 2 citations given for the edit on May 9 by the user -sche who is also in this discussion thread. Another sources from a researcher in this field is cited simultaneously. The discussion occured above in this section.

1230:

gender pronouns are using a system of gender binary" doesn't mean "a gender binary is traditional/typical" any more than "typically, people with red hair are called redheads" means "typically, people have red hair". (Also, there are people who identify as men or women and use masculine or feminine pronouns but who live in a society that also has a third gender, and thus are

2790:, "currently" does not belong. What purpose do you think "currently" serves, other than to imply that the world will one day not mostly adhere to a gender binary (which I highly doubt)? I see no reason to keep discussing the "most of the world adheres to a gender binary" aspect with you. So I stopped discussing with you. I'm not going to reply in your 3083:, since you are new here, but now that this has been explained to you by several editors, I hope you understand how this works, and that you'll refrain from simply stating your opinions, especially in such stark terms, but instead will formulate your comments in a way that points clearly to some change in content that will improve the article. 2917: 538: 458: 619:

cause is not because of people not allowing women in science but because women and men choose different professions on their own accord. I don't know anything about how wiki works so rather than fixing it myself I thought I'd bring it up on what ever this thing is for somebody who knows how to wiki to correct it to be less bias.

3879:“ They could happen to anyone, and are actually more common than you might think. You may have heard DSD called terms such as "intersex" or "hermaphrodite" or "pseudohermaphroditism." However, a meeting of international experts reached consensus that the term "disorders of sex development" should replace those terms.” 2409:

sense of the term) of human cultures, then they *should* be mentioned in the article, though perhaps not in the lead. Though in a cursory look through the literature, the first few sources seem to confirm gendered differences in the societies those papers were about, but I could easily not be looking

2091:

The article currently states that gender binary is now exercised in most of the world -- paraphrase. There is also a citation given as requested; and a citation from an unreliable source removed, as Mathglot and l discussed earlier in time but below these comments. l agree that gender binary is being

2018:

statement that does not need a citation. (This doesn't negate third genders going all the way back to antiquity in any way; in no culture would they become dominant or anywhere close to it then or now.) I find it hard to believe that many editors would doubt that statement. Apparently you do, though,

1841:

stated: Here's a charitable tip (reading the guidelines for you): the user who makes the edit is responsible for the citation. You can't edit without citing the source (and before that, knowing the source) of the information. Which begs the question: why are you making the edit instead of the persons

581:

I mostly undid your edit because, contrary to your stated aim, it shifted the article away from a neutral, RS-based point of view. I can try to elaborate when I have more time if needed, but hopefully other users will also comment. I tried to retain (and slightly expanded on) the helpful copyediting.

140:

Oh come on! You're one of those who ignore FACTS and only accept feelings as proof!!! The only BIAS here is what those minorities and you try to force on everyone, the fact is that human history is composed of FACTS and not mental illness passed as factual "identity", if someone is homosexual, that's

4884:

I am really glad you brought this up. There are parts I think we should remove, although I oppose removing the entire section. As is clear from the title and contents, the first part of the section discusses biologists' views on gender and biological factors that affect gender, and I think it should

4624:

I've just read through most of the content on this article, and it refers to gender being a social construct and presents the idea that there are more than two genders as fact. This is not a fact, this is a disputed view and given Knowledge is supposed to be about factual information and neutrality,

4414:

The first source is one authors theory of gender, but it isn't the only one commonly used. The second source is a survey article over widely used meanings of gender in academic articles and includes gender identity. Also worth noting article intros don't need to cite everything directly if the ideas

3963:

It is essential to acknowledge that an individual’s gender identity may not align with the sex assigned to them at birth. A narrow limit on the definition of sex would have public health consequences for the transgender population and individuals born with differences in sexual differentiation, also

855:

It would be much more neutral (and honest) to at least state at the outset that the original meaning of the word is grammatical, describe that meaning, then continue by describing the more recent gender studies definition. There still exist people who follow the original definition and consider the

851:

It seems to me that the introduction is biased in the way it presumes that the feminist/gender-studies definition promoted only since the 1970's, and only in progressive circles, is "the" definition of the word. For example, the first sentence states that "Gender is..." and proceeds to provide that

158:

It is also worth noting that the term "gender" also applies to things such as electrical and mechanical connections that have two mating parts (the male with "pokey out" characteristics and the female with a "matched hole" to recieve the "pokey out bit". An example of this would be the typical mains

4395:

The definition of gender as including gender identity, as stated in the second sentence of the first paragraph of the article, is not supported by the relevant references. The sentence reads: "Depending on the context, these characteristics may include biological sex (i.e., the state of being male,

4079:

I don't think anyone here is saying that intersex is a "third sex", but the reality is that biological sex is more complicated than just male and female, and in the context of gender, that's actually an important caveat. If you can come up with a better way to concisely express that, I'm sure folks

2725:

Regarding the removal of the source, I'm okay with it being removed again, following your explanation, and sorry for the revert. I was responding to the edit summary description as its being "unauthoritative", which is problematic for an editor to decide and sounds rather POVvy without support from

1472:

tag to the portion of the body where the claim of typicality is made, in the hope it would get cited; the lead does not normally have citations, because it merely summarizes the body (As my edit did). As to knowing intentions: I (and Flyer?) was charitably assuming good faith on the part of whoever

1144:

The wording of 'traditionally' is ambiguous. There are cultures which traditionally do not exercise a gender binary, among which, some do not have gender pronouns. Therefore, it is important to identify which traditions are being referred to specifically, and in what sense. The use of binary gender

618:

It looks like to me the science category is bias with the quote "Although these stereotypes have been dispelled in modern times, women are still underrepresented in prestigious "hard science" fields such as physics, and are less likely to hold high-ranking positions." as its now well known that the

2484:

I'm fine with the current wording — that "most" cultures use a gender binary, while "some" societies do not and instead have more than two genders i.e. have third genders — since it can be and is referenced. (If there were other RS saying "many" in place of either of the aforequoted words, I would

1388:

The change propose is to remove the word 'traditionally' as it is misleading, or to qualify it. l agree that removing the word is more concise than to add a qualifying preposition at the lead of the article. l do not know if gender binary is dominant, or if majority practice equate dominance; that

1359:

Minority traditions are also traditions. The audience of the article is people of all societies rather than members of what is referred to here as most societies. My contention is only with the use of "traditionally", that if it is to be used, it needs to be qualified because of the reasons stated

296:

Knowledge IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE whatsoever, but you hate so much Breitbart that you will spew lies upon lies. According to your "feelings", if wikipedia says so is truth, so you add your false claims and suddenly they are true because "Knowledge is the word of the gods, and since you wrote that

4640:

This quote in the intro is a good overview at how gender is looked at by social and natural scientists, with weight given to different ideas common in different fields. "The social sciences sometimes approach gender as a social construct, and gender studies particularly do, while research in the

2980:

This specific line. “ Sexologist John Money introduced the terminological distinction between biological sex and gender as a role in 1955. Before his work, it was uncommon to use the word gender to refer to anything but grammatical categories. However, Money's meaning of the word did not become

1229:

You make a good point that "typically" may be a better word than "traditionally", and also make me realize that if the lead is supposed to say societies typically use a gender binary, it doesn't do that right now. "Traditionally , people who identify as men or women or use masculine or feminine

879:

But Knowledge uses recent, reliable sources. Our articles on plate tectonics, climate science and extrasolar planets aren't based on pre-1970 scholarshiip, and neither are our articles on sexuality, gender identity or gender. We must maintain consistency based on reliable sources throughout the

821:

Agree with the first three. I think that Misandry/Misogyny (alphabetized this time ;) ) should be kept and Sexism removed. Both those articles are distinct and higher quality articles than Sexism (B- vs. C-class). I's like to point to the existance of the articles themselves: They could both be

4553:

At that previous discussion, I see a rough consensus, including yourself, that agrees with removing the parenthetical. I do as well. So I removed it. I don't see it as necessary either, and it is true that intersex is not a third sex. And intersex conditions are not really ever called genders.

565:

Perhaps we should make some qualifications in the change of this article. First and foremost, there is no reason for there to be a section on gender and various political issues, or gender and climate change. Additionally, the gender and science section is completely nonsensical in its current

2662:

l made an edit earlier today to remove the non-authoritative source chosen to include verbatim phrase 'many, if not most societies' in the article's text. The source in question comes from a clinical psychiatrist in a text about elder care. There is ample research for the issue in question in

2230:

Also, my original edit, the one that started this discussion, was removed by Flyer22 Reborn stating that it cited a poor source. l then changed the source to an academic research, at which point the issue changed to my wording being odd. l already gave my reasons for the edit in response. The

1951:" That means an editor has to perform due diligence to ensure verifiability, i.e., to ensure that sources exist that support the assertion, before adding the material. However, that doesn't mean you have to add those sources in a citation every time. That is made clear by the next sentence: " 3941:

you give is from 14 years ago. More recent sources make it clear that intersex refers to those individuals who do not fit into the medicotypical categories of male or female. You insisting that the SRY gene or some other criterion is the defining characteristic of a male or female person is

1443:

to the information inserted. l gave my sources when l made an edit, and l further gave more sources when l participated in this discussion. However, the edits that replaced the one l made have no citations, and the contributors seem to be offering information from their own observations (or

4208:

Please use colons to indent your comments underneath the comment you're replying to and place your signature (using four tildes) on the same line, in order to make the conversation more readable. But do you have any suggestions for how to word the sentence? How would everyone think of

110:

It's probably worth noting that almost 90% of this article addresses 0.05% of the human population (or 0.6% of European and 1% of American, whilst 0% of almost all other continents) and ignores the other 99%+. It is also worth noting that this 'gender is a spectrum' thing is new, with

3670:

We go by what reliable sources say. And newborns with clinically observable intersex conditions are, by legal mandate, categorized as male or female on birth certificates in states and nations where intersex is not a category option. That is a social, not a biological, determination

2693:; I've removed it. This was collateral damage from the "unsigned" tool, in an otherwise successful attempt to tag an unsigned edit by an IP in the same section as yours. The very handy "unsigned" helper tool (just click it, and it adds the template with correct data) is described 2300:

l find that the guidelines are applied unevenly in a consistent, observable manner by Flyer22 Reborn, l hope this isn't cultural. There are also edits that Flyer22 Reborn made without discussion here at all, all observable on edit history. l posted a complaint several hours ago

4487:

I’m not saying these individuals don’t exist nor am I saying we should delete the line all together but I feel like the line should be edited to give a little more context. It’s one thing to acknowledge a group’s existence, it’s another thing to misrepresent classifications.

1192:

to it. "Traditionally" is fine in this case. The vast majority of the world adheres to a gender binary (which is why, for example, men typically have short hair and women typically have long hair), and that's common knowledge. Everyone also knows what is meant by "traditional

189:

Most of this article is about gender as it pertains to gender roles, and gender in terms of gender roles is what the topic of gender mainly concerns. The article is not even close to being mainly about third gender and genderqueer topics. If you want this article to be about

2777:

unless using that source for a matter that is well-supported in the literature and which is not a specific quote by the World Health Organization. Yes, for the Gender article, the "Culture, Heritage, and Diversity in Older Adult Mental Health Care" source, published by the

2666:

l also noticed that you put an 'unsigned' signature in one of my statements in the discussion about bias throughout the article below. If you will review that statement now, you can see that l already signed it prior to your intervention, but thanks for trying to help.

4068:

The problem is some intersex people do consider being intersex as separate from being biologically male or female. There are even countries, such as Chile, where it is standard to register babies as intersex rather than male or female, if their sex is indeterminate at

1098:

I think I see where Ellesmelle is coming from. I've known older Chinese people who switched back and forth between "he" and "she" (in English) in reference to the same person because they never got used to pronouns being gendered, so I get that using gendered pronouns

3086:

In order to stimulate that discussion, and point you in the right direction, what sentence, or sentences, in the article would you like to replace or change, and what text would you like to see there instead, and why? When thinking about this, please have a look at

1344:

that most societies use a binary; it's what I essentially stated to Ellesmelle above. I can source it if no one else does. The wording "a gender binary of men and women" comes across as awkward to me. Give me a few days to look at sources and see about some wording.

4076:(which is probably the most prominent intersex advocacy organization in the US), "Most people think biological sex is either 'male' or 'female,' but it can actually be more complicated... Intersex people may identify as male, female, no gender or multiple genders." 3969:

Unless you can show that medicine as a discipline largely agree that SRY or some other criterion can sort all individuals into "male or female" and that those are the only two accepted categories, your proposed edit would be based on your personal view and that is

1125:

use masculine or feminine gender pronouns" are inherently under the non-binary umbrella. Would it work to reword the sentence to something like "Traditionally, people who whereas those who do not identify as exclusively men or women fall under the umbrella "?

3810:

What, then, would Klinefelter Syndrome or XO be? Chromosomes, gonads, genitalia, and hormones are individually not sufficient conditions to meet "male" and "female". Moreover, you appear to suggest that intersex is not already from a "biological perspective".

1820:

At any rate, the historical wording (and previous wording) comes from a non-authoritative source given in addition to an authoritative source, so l changed the current wording to that of the authority. 12:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC) edited 10:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

3305:“Affected females mature normally with normal fertility, there is almost total regression of the genital anomaly in cases of simple clitoral enlargement, and in even the most severe cases, surgical correction of labioscrotal fusion is relatively simple.” 1237:

If there are citations for the statement that most societies use a binary (the relevant sentence in the body appears to be uncited, and it's not "sky is blue"-level obvious, given how many societies have had third genders, and especially needs a citation

1049:. As an aside, all but the first subsection now end with an indented quote, and I just find it esthetically more pleasing when an indented quotations is embedded in the middle of a subsection, rather than ending it; but that's more a question of style. 4470:

This model might have its flaws and yes I’m aware that it can be hard to easily classify people as male or female but intersex isn’t a third sex and (depending on who you ask) some organizations aren’t arguing for the whole third sex catergory either.

2822:

As sex (n.) took on erotic qualities in 20c., gender came to be the usual English word for "sex of a human being," in which use it was at first regarded as colloquial or humorous." So to say this distinction occurred in the 20th century appears to be

173:

I couldn't agree more. I am shocked at the extent unverified social 'science' findings are being portrayed as fact on this page. To 99.7% of the population, sex and gender are the same thing, yet the page devotes 90% of its time to the 0.03%. Crazy.

3377:“5-alpha reductase deficiency is a condition that affects male sexual development before birth and during puberty. People with this condition are genetically male, with one X and one Y chromosome in each cell, and they have male gonads (testes).” 3853:

Several sources say it’s the absence or the presence of the Y chromosome that makes you male or female. However, if there is a vital gene that’s on the Y chromosome called the SRY gene and if it malfunctions or it’s defective you become female.

313:

This is true, but wikipedia do not care if a source is reliable or not. It just has to exist. That's why you you'll find just as unreliable source like ... well, just every media of the world, CNN, fox, RT, WaPo, etc. And scientists claims

4567:

I'm fine with you making that edit. The sentence did not present intersex people as a third sex to me, or else I would have changed it long ago. But I can see how a layperson unfamiliar with the topic might have taken it as "third sex."

4465: 3564:“In boys, the penis is usually flat and short, with the exposed inner surface of the urethra on top. The penis is sometimes split into a right and left half. In girls, the clitoris is split and there may be one or two vaginal openings.” 2840:

The entry you cited from the etymological dictionary is for "Sex", not "gender". Gender was used grammatically for most of history. It did not refer to something "becoming" male or female like it is used today - as a social construct or

3525:“17-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 3 deficiency is a condition that affects male sexual development. People with this condition are genetically male, with one X and one Y chromosome in each cell, and they have male gonads (testes).” 1164:). l am not suggesting that not having gender pronouns beget an absence of gender. l mean that the linguistic mechanism of binary gender pronouns profoundly affect how gender is viewed. This observation is supported by the content at 4374:

No. Per above, if a compromise is to be had, remove the parenthetical altogether. And, on a side note, regardless of you trying to explain biology to me, I do not see how you do not get how awful "the typical male or female" sounds.

990:

I strongly disagree with the assessment of this article's importance as "Low" for Gender Studies. It appears you're using a script or something, but I've edited the importance assessments to "Top". Gender is a fundamental concept.

4297:

I presented sources showing that intersex conditions are atypical if you wish to see more sources I’ll provide some. I’m saying these are the typical of biological sex. You can see that this model is typical by sex determination.

3587:“The De La Chapelle syndrome (XX male) is a peripheral hypogonadism concerning males with 46,XX karyotype. We conducted a retrospective study of 18 cases and report the main clinical biological and hormonal characteristics.” 318:

and only 1 out of 3 of landmark sociology studies could actually be reliable (the remaining being either not that sure, or just plainly wrong). So, as long as Breitbart's POV is labelled as such, well, what's the problem?

159:

electrical connections found in the home. To neglect the historical and current use of the the term "gender" and attempt to redefine it in a new and unique way for political or social ends, only but discredits Knowledge

4755:

Gender" refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women,this definition is from the who and it should be up but it's ignored

3175:

Putting intersex in there is a little misleading because several medical and scientific sources state that people with these conditions are males or females. So I think maybe add some context or a better explanation.

2400:

Okay, then I completely misread you on that. In that case, what do you want to change from what it says now, or are you happy with it the way it is? If you think your references are reliable and represent more than a

1444:

research). There are also other statements in the very beginning of this article with no citations. l noticed the low quality of the article when l used it, which prompted me to make my contribution. l also wonder how

4217:"? I think that solves both problems, namely: 1) informs the reader that not everyone fits under the classic XX or XY; and 2) doesn't imply that intersex is a third sex completely outside the male/female umbrella. 4193:

The line that I specifically had a problem with was talking about biological sex. So I believe sources that know about biology and or health would be more reliable in this situation instead of a human rights source.

377:

This article mentions the concept of gender assigned at birth. This is not a concept held up in academic circles. I propose keeping the article factual and academic and not influenced by social justice terminology.

3143:

Okay let me explain why it could be political motivated. For one, the sources says it. “ However, Money's meaning of the word did not become widespread until the 1970s, when feminist theory embraced the concept”

1389:

would be a seperate change. l would not make that change as l am not informed. If anyone else do not oppose to my proposed edit, l would go ahead and make it, or someone else can do so if they feel compelled to.

3075:, about how you think it should be changed in order to improve it. If this is just your opinion about the article, and you are merely criticizing, as others have indicated, that has no place on this page. The 1959:" Editors who add something they judge to be obvious (i.e., "unlikely to be challenged") such as, say, the gender binary observed in all societies, may leave out the citation and still be fully in accord with 194:, it would look very different. It would look like the Biological sex article, which is indeed a different topic. Of course, biological sex is an aspect of gender, and the Gender article is clear about that. 1657:

discusses people with non-binary gender, that is historical. Whether or not its practice is accepted by other social groups is another issue. Now the conversation is going back to the issue in the beginning.

822:

combined and put into the umbrella article of Sexism, but they haven't. They're notable and distinct enough to be their own articles, and they're notable and distinct enough to be their own See-Also links.

4592:

As for "And intersex conditions are not really ever called genders.", we know that intersex people are often discussed in the context of gender, which is why they are mentioned in this article and in the

4539:, do not do that again. That IP is you. You aren't fooling anyone by blanking a topic as an IP not long before starting a new discussion on the same topic while logged in. You at least aren't fooling me. 1155:

gives an example of spoken Chinese as a language that does not contain gender pronouns. Hindi is another example; some of the Hindi speaking population traditionally do not exercise a gender binary (see

4466:

https://bio.libretexts.org/?title=Bookshelves%2FCell_and_Molecular_Biology%2FBook%3A_Biofundamentals_%28Klymkowsky_%26_Cooper%29%2F04%3A_Social_evolution_and_sexual_selection%2F4.09%3A_Sexual_dimorphism

3021:

I see no accusations or personal attacks in the statements above. Sure looks like a good-faith voicing of a concern, which is something to be commended, particularly given that CycoMa is a new editor.

1407:

to say (but not what it actually said). Further improvements are welcome. (I also deviated from the wording I proposed above in an effort to fix the awkwardness of "a gender binary of men and women".)

4180:

I read the Knowledge article for intersex. However, the quote one that article is from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights which is not a scientific or medical source.

5035:

for the reasons listed above. I'd add: neither subsection even mentions the word gender. I am not opposed to sections existing with those titles but the current versions seem entirely out of scope.

3861: 2707:

template to a Talk entry which was not the last entry in the section, and apparently the tool *only* works on the last section entry, hence, the problem you saw. My apologies. You can look at my

320: 1931:, and because they are not necessary in a properly constructed article where the body material being summarized in the lead is already referenced in the body where it appears in more detail. 2897:

the section titled: Non-binary and third genders calls for citation. Here is an article from The Guardian that is more that two years old, showing that Oregon allows a third-gender option:

441: 1145:

pronouns are important enough to be mentioned in conjunction with binary gender identity. In the sentence, the weight placed on binary identity vs use of binary pronouns are the same (as

3422:“Some males have an unusually small penis (microphallus), undescended testes, hypospadias (urethra located on the underside of the penis), and/ or bifid scrotum (scrotum split in two).” 4518:. It should be left alone unless something better is offered to replace it. And it's not like the intersex piece should be extended in that parentheses or the lead sentence should give 3947: 4711:

I see that here is completely ignored what the who says, gender is a social construction, I find it unfortunate that it is not considered that way, we have to change the whole article

4474:

Also side note there isn’t really an agreement on what classifies as intersex. Like some sources claim that intersex is 1.7%, others claim it’s 0.5%, 0.2%, or even as low as 0.018%.

4231:

An even easier solution would be to remove the parenthetical phrase entirely: "Depending on the context, these characteristics may include biological sex...". That seems fine to me.

3804:

Like I said dude genetically male. The reason I edited in the first place because the line states “ biological sex (i.e., the state of being male, female, or an intersex variation)”

1448:

knows what another editor's intentions are, and proceeds to make edits based on that knowledge. By my standards, and the standards outlined by Knowledge, this edit is not acceptable.

3596:“XX male syndrome: A syndrome characterized by the presence of an XX sex chromosome complement in an individual with male genitalia including both testes but no sperm production .” 3063:, I see that you are a brand new editor. Welcome to Knowledge! There are a lot of things to learn to get fully on board at Knowledge, and one of them is that we put great stock in 899:.) The current use originate from linguistics, but the current introduction has no reference to gender's relationship to language at all. This information is also relevant to the 3623:. And note the clear inconsistency of terms in the definitions you provided. Male genitalia is not the same as a male person. And a "female newborn" would better be described as 4399:

It seems none of the three references listed support the claim that the term gender includes gender identity, and I interpret the first source as actually opposing this veiw.

3923:“ This protein starts processes that cause a fetus to develop male gonads (testes) and prevent the development of female reproductive structures (uterus and fallopian tubes).” 4837:

thing? If that’s the case then the information in there doesn’t belong here and should be moved to other places. I’m gonna wait and see what other people say on the matter.

3079:(like this one) is a place for editors to discuss among themselves how to best improve the article. It is not a place to provide your opinion about the article. You get a 1239: 126:

Oh come on! You're someone who uses the phrase "cultural Marxist"; you can't reasonably expect to be able to cite a mainstream encyclopaedia in support of your opinions.

1499:), page 401 says "Most cultures currently construct their societies based on the understanding of gender binary—the two gender categorizations ", and Maria Llorente / 4659:

Biologically speaking yes there is only there are only two sexes but since gender is different from culture to culture there is no number on the amount of genders.

3334: 1403:

OK, I had a go at changing it, removing "traditionally" and rewriting it so that it actually said that a binary was typical, since that is apparently what it was

315: 2734:

in the summary and left out "unauthoritative", I would not have touched your edit. You can revert back, and I'm okay with that. Thanks for explaining it here.

1568:

I don't see that "traditionally" was inaccurate, especially given the sources -sche has provided, but I concede that it wasn't the best wording. Regarding the

922:

The section on biology contains very little references to current biological issues related to gender, and most of it is simply ill or not referenced at all.

2650:". Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines, vol 48, no. 2, 2014, pp. 315-331. Routledge. doi:10.1080/00083968.2014.951665 4136:

Many of these conditions cause things like learning disorders, infertility, increase chance of cancer, heart problems, low salt, and various other problems.

4070: 675:

article. The "Depending on the context, these characteristics may include" text in the Gender article does make sense and explains itself immediately after.

2984:

There could be a possibility that theses facts could be propaganda to push a political agenda. I think we should look further into it or find more sources.

2697:, but there's no documentation for it. I've used it successfully many times, without problems; however, this was the first time I tried to use it to add an 4796:

Second, uses those sources for so called “gender taxonomy” is original research because none of the sources implied or said there is or was a taxonomy.

1374:

Even removing "traditionally," I think the lead should still make clear that the gender binary is dominant. Again, I'll get back to this with sources.

4799:

Third, do any of the sources say that all those elements equate to a taxonomy. Or did someone just combine unrelated sources together to create that.

3071:

on the part of other editors, and if you disagree with the content of the article, you should lay out your facts, backed up by specific examples, and

2019:

and if Flyer or -sche or somebody doesn't mind finding a reference to what seems blue-sky obvious to me, adding the reference certainly doesn't hurt.

3339:“In females, enlarged clitoris or genitals that look more male than female (ambiguous genitalia) at birth, but males have normal appearing genitals” 2832: 4625:

why is there not even single section on this article referring to this subject being controversial? In my opinion, this article is highly biased. --

1041:

section. As a side benefit, these new headers help point out where the content is weak and could use some expansion in certain areas, especially in

4112:

Various sources agree with me on this stance. Hell the Knowledge articles for these intersex conditions state they are biologically male or female.

3268:“Turner syndrome, a condition that affects only females, results when one of the X chromosomes (sex chromosomes) is missing or partially missing.“ 2981:

widespread until the 1970s, when feminist theory embraced the concept of a distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender.”

2817:, it seems that the use of the term Gender to discriminate male and female occurred in the 15th century in early English. To quote this resource: ' 3664:

You can be born without a penis and still be male and several of these sources mention that ambiguous genitalia happens to both males and females.

2014:

Here, I happen to agree with Flyer and -sche about the gender binary being found universally in every culture in the world, and I think this is a

3946:. The medical community and social sciences that inform their terminology selections have generally moved away from the "male/female" dichotomy ( 895:

l support defining gender as sex in the context of society and culture, and the extension of the word's current use from the use in grammar (per

2302: 3067:

of everything that goes into articles. Even if you think that there are things in the article that are propaganda, you should step back a bit,

2934: 4021:, but it absolutely needs to include a way for the reader to know that not everybody falls under XX or XY and it needs to be presented from a 3392:“A freemartin or free-martin (sometimes martin heifer) is an infertile female mammal with masculinized behavior and non-functioning ovaries.” 3807:

The line was talking about the biological perspective, so I think it’s appropriate to do from it a biological perspective instead of social.

1999:" However, that is not the same as saying it must have a citation, only that it's possible to find a citation, if the material is challenged. 937: 871: 521: 160: 4870:

Basically the entire section because I believe editors who written that section were confused on the matter by confusing sex with gender.

4907:

Sex and gender are still connected, even though they are distinct concepts. A lot of things subsumed by 'gender' are still biologically

1103:

someone is connected to having such pronouns. However, as you (Flyer) note, the sentence is saying "people who identify as men or women

652: 385: 252: 3865: 4400: 2824: 324: 175: 4435:

I know I already mentioned this section and I already talked about this last time but hear me out. This line right here states that.

695:

Contemporary socialisation theory proposes the notion that when a child is first born it has a biological sex but no social gender.

3958: 795: 626: 2950:

This whole article mentions social sciences of gender. But if that’s the case why does talk say it was removed from the category?

645:" Depending on the context, these characteristics may include" A definition based on context is useless, can you please fix this? 445: 4311: 4294:

I said it’s the typical one. What is a typical male or female. That’s simple XX=female and XY=male. Penis=male and vagina=female.

4954:

I don't know what you mean. Dealing with the controversy above this one is enough of a time suck; this isn't the time for more.

4341: 2779: 836: 2773:

is an authoritative source for medical topics, but we will prioritize literature reviews and give the World Health Organization

667:

We have a number of topics that have a term that refers to more than one thing. See the different definitions of atheism in the

4889:; the first part gives a too-basic overview of DNA, sexual reproduction, and genetics and that's followed up by the subsection 3335:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/congenital-adrenal-hyperplasia/symptoms-causes/syc-20355205?page=0&citems=10

3285:“Klinefelter syndrome (KS), also known as 47, XXY is the set of symptoms that result from two or more X chromosomes in males.” 2694: 3263: 3216:

Please provide a neutral and reliable source for your change or I recommend it be reverted until such a source can be found.

4077: 2595: 1507: 1496: 550: 4011:

My overall problem with adding intersex is that the line paints intersex as a third sex or a combination of male or female."

3559: 4441:

The issue with this particular line is that gives off the impression that intersex is a third sex category isn’t the case.

3891:

My overall problem with adding intersex is that the line paints intersex as a third sex or a combination of male or female.

5088: 5040: 4898: 4857: 2898: 2774: 832: 244: 228: 4356:

How about this. We change the line to something along the lines of (the typical male or female, and intersex variations)

1927:, which neither requires nor prohibits citations in the LEAD. Many articles appropriately omit lead references to reduce 4503: 3737: 3191: 3133: 2965: 2730:; however your explanation here that we already have more and better sources for it is enough. Had you mentioned, say, 2814: 4911:. So there should definitely be a section on biological influences. And anything from this article wouldn't belong at 4522:

to the intersex aspect in the lead. Per how you behaved last time, I do not think you should touch it unless you have

4133:

Another problem with that claim is that many intersex conditions are actually pretty serious and do require treatment.

3520: 1246:

Traditionally, people who identify as men or women or use masculine or feminine gender pronouns are using a system of

1161: 3401: 3172:“ these characteristics may include biological sex (i.e., the state of being male, female, or an intersex variation” 2929: 2544: 38: 3417: 3362:“Aphallia - A rare occurrence where a male is born without a penis or where a female is born without a clitoris.” 4455: 3342: 2770: 546: 5084: 5036: 4894: 4853: 4630: 4602: 4573: 4544: 4438:“characteristics may include biological sex (i.e., the state of being male, female, or an intersex variation)“ 4380: 4272: 2799: 2783: 1585: 1466: 1379: 1350: 1210: 1198: 1088: 933: 680: 603: 199: 525: 164: 867: 656: 389: 4326: 2872: 2828: 1440: 1436: 496: 415: 342: 256: 179: 4396:

female, or an intersex variation), sex-based social structures (i.e., gender roles), or gender identity.".

630: 4519: 4404: 4263:. As for "the typical male or female"? I oppose that. What is "the typical male or female"? So I reverted 4051:

I’m just saying how that sentence was written might make a reader think the term intersex means third sex.

3991: 3828: 3768: 3688: 3644: 3047: 2690: 1008: 969: 885: 286: 116: 97: 4626: 4761: 4716: 3271: 2924: 1928: 1341: 863: 791: 357: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3504:“Anorchia (Pic. 1) is a disorder of sex development, in which a male is born with both testes absent.” 3289: 1017:

Indeed, I think it would be self-evident that gender is a top-importance article for gender studies. --

4491: 3857: 3725: 3716:

This has nothing to do with social or legal anything, the sources are medical and scientific sources.

3462: 3179: 3121: 3012: 2953: 2672: 2310: 1847: 1826: 1453: 1426: 1394: 1365: 1176: 925: 908: 859: 783: 727: 648: 622: 571: 381: 216: 3582: 3406:“Persistent Mullerian duct syndrome (PMDS) is a disorder of sexual development that affects males.” 1117:", is inaccurate if taken to mean / include "those who exist outside fall under the umbrella terms 4678:

The more you explore, the more you find out, but it gets even more confusing. Let's keep exploring

4598: 4569: 4540: 4523: 4376: 4346: 4268: 3591: 2905: 2846: 2795: 2758: 2406: 2231:

information required qualification. That information is now completely eliminated from the article.

1643: 1581: 1435:

So l gather that the other editors involved in this discussion are not concerned about Knowledge's

1375: 1346: 1206: 1146: 1111:", the accuracy of which seems unaffected by the existence of languages without gendered pronouns. 1084: 1080: 1022: 929: 717: 676: 599: 298: 195: 142: 3432: 856:

gender studies definition as a form of forced jargon or a biased attempt at redefining the word.

5102: 4679: 3950: 3751:

of XY. They are assigned female at birth based on a visual assessment of the external genitalia.

3372: 3108: 2739: 2731: 2716: 2415: 2024: 1573: 1303: 1261: 1260:. Some cultures have specific gender roles that are distinct from "man" and "woman," such as the 1054: 900: 707: 470: 338: 302: 146: 131: 4351: 4336: 3437:“the insensitivity to androgens is clinically significant only when it occurs in genetic males” 880:

project, rathet than relying on FRINGE commentators who cling to pre-1970 definitions of terms.

4535:

you blanking a talk page discussion as an IP before posting under your registered account. Per

4312:

https://www.toppr.com/guides/biology/principles-of-inheritance-and-variation/sex-determination/

1113:

I suppose the second part, "those who exist outside these groups fall under the umbrella terms

4342:

https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?ContentTypeID=90&ContentID=P03079

4250: 4236: 4222: 4163: 4085: 4030: 3975: 3812: 3752: 3672: 3628: 3578:“approximately 1:20,000 newborn males, making it much less common than Klinefelter syndrome.” 3447: 3221: 3042: 3026: 2762: 2701: 2592: 2015: 1992: 1504: 1493: 992: 953: 881: 828: 812: 273: 224: 210: 112: 4975:

Yeah your right, let’s just put this discussion on hold until the other earlier one is fixed.

4620:

Why does this article have no mention of the opposing views to "gender is a social construct"

4460: 5070: 5018: 4994: 4980: 4945: 4875: 4852:

I can't comment more specifically without knowing which "some things" you are referring to.

4842: 4807: 4757: 4746: 4712: 4697: 4683: 4664: 4499: 4364: 4211:

these characteristics may include biological sex (such as the typical male or female, or an

4199: 4141: 4122: 4059: 3928: 3899: 3733: 3610: 3206: 3187: 3158: 3129: 2989: 2961: 1944: 787: 352: 4331: 3264:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/turner-syndrome/symptoms-causes/syc-20360782

1949:

The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material.

4956: 4934: 4917: 4773: 4731: 4646: 4556: 4420: 3038: 3008: 2787: 2766: 2711:

file, or the one at the link, to see how to make it available to you, should you wish to.

2684: 2668: 2490: 2384: 2306: 1906: 1843: 1822: 1577: 1515: 1449: 1422: 1412: 1390: 1361: 1331: 1185: 1172: 1131: 1068: 1064:"In the traditions of cultures dominated by languages in which there are gender pronouns." 904: 587: 567: 4937:

I’m not entirely sure there is a consensus on what gender is in the sociological context.

3560:

http://www.childrenshospital.org/conditions-and-treatments/conditions/c/cloacal-exstrophy

3534: 1326:

The bit about pronouns which I struck through above could be dropped from the lead, IMO.

4321: 3953: 3490: 2808: 1916:

There are also other statements in the very beginning of this article with no citations.

4829:. Because didn’t this article and other Knowledge articles on this site establish that 4536: 4022: 3971: 3100: 3096: 3080: 3076: 2901: 2899:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/15/oregon-third-gender-option-identity-law

2842: 2727: 1964: 1924: 1189: 1018: 985: 245:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/10/26/gender-sociology-deny-biological-differences

191: 3473: 3300: 896: 5098: 5065:

I saved the human brain section because I do believe it can be useful somewhere else.

4447:

Male is an organism that produces sperm and female is a organism that produces ovum.

4316: 3938: 3884: 3104: 3068: 3000: 2791: 2735: 2712: 2659: 2411: 2020: 1649: 1285: 1247: 1108: 1050: 758:: Destination is about prejudice (is too specific), can be covered by single link to 744:: Destination is about prejudice (is too specific), can be covered by single link to 466: 272:

I dunno... but Breitbart is Not a reliable source for basically anything whatsoever.

127: 3719:

The sources state that people with these conditions are biologically male or female.

3667:

Plus I edited intersex because I think we should go by the biologically definition.

3499: 2815:

https://www.etymonline.com/word/sex?ref=etymonline_crossreference#etymonline_v_23308

2634: 5027:

I am interested in continuing this discussion. In particular, I am about to remove

4741:

I don’t think you understand what they mean when they say it’s a social construct.

4246: 4232: 4218: 4159: 4081: 4026: 3943: 3620: 3521:

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/17-beta-hydroxysteroid-dehydrogenase-3-deficiency

3428:“PAIS only affects males, but females can be carriers for this genetic condition.” 3357: 3217: 3147:

There could be a possibility feminists are changing the definition to push a goal.

3092: 3072: 3022: 1312: 1270: 1171:

The use of 'traditionally' begs clarification about which traditions it refers to.

824: 808: 334: 220: 4301: 3402:

https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/8435/persistent-mullerian-duct-syndrome

3317: 3722:

Like people with Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome are genetically male.

3322:“Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) is when a person who is genetically male” 2402: 1996: 1956: 1952: 1948: 5066: 5014: 4990: 4976: 4941: 4871: 4838: 4803: 4742: 4693: 4660: 4495: 4360: 4195: 4137: 4118: 4055: 3924: 3895: 3729: 3606: 3202: 3183: 3154: 3125: 3088: 3064: 3060: 2985: 2957: 1980: 1960: 1654: 1256: 1194: 47: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

17: 4726:

Show a link for the WHO source you mention here and maybe it can be included.

3418:

https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/androgen-insensitivity-syndrome-partial/

2809:

Didn't the use of the word 'Gender' precede 'Sex' as a male/female distinction?

2647: 2305:

l might conclude that the complaint prompted further scrutiny of my actions. --

4727: 4642: 4456:

https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-47829-6_340-1

4416: 4306: 3343:

https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/1467/congenital-adrenal-hyperplasia

2486: 2395: 2380: 1838: 1511: 1445: 1408: 1327: 1307: 1302:. Some societies have specific genders besides "man" and "woman", such as the 1294: 1265: 1152: 1127: 583: 5079:

Good call. For future readers who want to access the removed content, here's

3539:“Females with aromatase deficiency have a typical female chromosome pattern” 4594: 4477: 3748: 2786:, but that source can be reliable for some things. And I told you that, per 2637:". African Studies, January 2015, doi=10.1093/obo/9780199846733-0162. JSTOR. 2576:

The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses

3876:

Also the term intersex has been replaced with disorders of sex development.

3507: 2611:". International Review of Social History, vol. 44, 1999, pp. 15–31. JSTOR. 1250:

whereas those who exist outside these groups fall under the umbrella terms

948:

What do you mean "Ill"? For the record, the edit made by the above user is

5106: 5092: 5074: 5044: 5022: 4998: 4984: 4962: 4949: 4923: 4902: 4879: 4861: 4846: 4811: 4779: 4765: 4750: 4735: 4720: 4701: 4687: 4668: 4650: 4634: 4606: 4577: 4562: 4548: 4507: 4424: 4408: 4384: 4368: 4276: 4254: 4240: 4226: 4203: 4167: 4145: 4126: 4089: 4063: 4034: 3994: 3932: 3903: 3869: 3831: 3771: 3741: 3691: 3647: 3614: 3225: 3210: 3195: 3162: 3137: 3112: 3053: 3030: 3016: 2993: 2969: 2939: 2909: 2850: 2803: 2743: 2720: 2676: 2589:

Sexuality & Gender Politics in Mozambique: Rethinking Gender in Africa

2494: 2419: 2388: 2314: 2028: 1911:, A couple of agreements and quibbles about your understanding of policy: 1851: 1830: 1589: 1519: 1457: 1430: 1416: 1398: 1383: 1369: 1354: 1335: 1202: 1180: 1135: 1092: 1058: 1026: 1011: 972: 941: 912: 889: 840: 816: 799: 684: 660: 634: 607: 591: 575: 554: 529: 474: 449: 393: 360: 346: 328: 306: 288: 260: 232: 203: 183: 168: 150: 135: 120: 4450: 4327:

https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/health/d/disorders-sexual-development

4212: 4073: 4016: 3150:

Second, there is evidence that Money himself was pushing a goal as well.

1953:

any material whose verifiability is challenged or likely to be challenged

777: 773: 751: 737: 3894:

However, from a scientific standpoint that’s inaccurate and misleading.

3545: 3280: 2608: 5013:

Also most of the sources in the biological section are medical sources.

2621: 2007:

There are cultures which traditionally do not exercise a gender binary,

1764: 672: 1481:

is not usable for a claim that societies don't have (binary or other)

297:

like, YOU represent the gods"... Next time bring FACTS not feelings.--

3272:

https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/turner/conditioninfo/symptoms

2876: 2820:“The "male-or-female sex" sense is attested in English from early 15c 2648:

Dispelling the myth of pre-colonial gender equality in Yoruba culture

2092:

exercised in most societies. This is not why l requested a reference.

1165: 1157: 1046: 1042: 1038: 765: 759: 745: 500: 419: 4267:

as well. Removing the parenthetical phrase altogether works for me.

3290:

https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/8705/klinefelter-syndrome

1292:; those who exist outside these groups fall under the umbrella term 3912: 3573: 1995:

principle that Flyer already enunciated. That is, yes: WP:V says, "

3463:

https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/10771/kallmann-syndrome

3118:

You are right, I should have given a reason to why I think this.

2563:

Family Matters: Feminist Concepts in African Philosophy of Culture

1501:

Culture, Heritage, and Diversity in Older Adult Mental Health Care

239:

Breitbart: 95% Gender Sociology Papers Deny Biological Differences

3583:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11268892-de-la-chapelle-syndrome/

3542:“Men with this condition have a typical male chromosome pattern” 2609:

Family Concerns: Gender and Ethnicity in Pre-Colonial West Africa

1576:

points to citations in the lead being a case-by-case matter. Per

4940:

Didn’t the article mention that what gender varies from context?

4347:

https://www.amboss.com/us/knowledge/Disorders_of_sex_development

3624: 3592:

https://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=25059

3478: 3433:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Partial_androgen_insensitivity_syndrome

3358:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Disorders_of_sex_development#Conditions

1710:

There are other groups and classes of people throughout history.

1107:

use masculine or feminine gender pronouns are using a system of

4597:

article. But, yes, intersex conditions are not called genders.

1972:

You can't edit without citing the source... of the information.

1234:

using a gender binary, another way the current wording is odd.)

4912: 4826: 4483:

Some would argue that POCS or Kallmann syndrome are intersex.

3373:

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/5-alpha-reductase-deficiency

2860: 2749:

Ellesmelle, I don't see why you feel that I needed to discuss

484: 403: 25: 4352:

https://www.utmb.edu/pedi_ed/CoreV2/Endocrine/Endocrine7.html

4337:

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/mmr.2019.10819

3448:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Mild_androgen_insensitivity_syndrome

2946:

Why does it say this article was removed from social science?

2624:". Feminist Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, 1986, pp. 91–103. JSTOR. 1290:(who often use masculine and feminine pronouns, respectively) 1188:, hi. Since this page is on my watchlist, I prefer not to be 4156:

do not fit the typical definitions for male or female bodies

1936:

the user who makes the edit is responsible for the citation.

3387: 465:

Please express your request in a "change X, to Y format".

4771:

It's cited at the end of the second paragraph. It's here.

4461:

https://academic.oup.com/molehr/article/20/12/1161/1062990

545:

Please express your request in a "change X, to Y format".

3467:“Males with KS may have signs of the condition at birth” 1957:

to a reliable, published source using an inline citation.

1488:

As for citing the claim of typicality... Kevin L. Nadal,

4515: 4332:

https://academic.oup.com/jpepsy/article/42/5/487/3078071

3041:, you need to provide reliable contradicting sources. — 1842:

who know what they are talking about? In this case: me.

5080: 4532: 4415:

come from the body of the article and are cited there.

4264: 4260: 3301:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Progestin-induced_virilization

2754: 2750: 1569: 1076: 1072: 949: 668: 4915:

since this one is human-centered and that one is not.

4117:

We should go by the biological not view of the topic.

3535:

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/aromatase-deficiency

2765:. We can see this with our medical articles. Yes, per 1360:

above. l would concur if the word was simply removed.

1037:

I added some subsection headers to help structure the

251:

Is sociology a reliable source for biological claims?

4322:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866176/

3491:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154292/

2782:, that was used is not specifically about gender and 4302:

https://en.wikipedia.org/XY_sex-determination_system

4054:

However, that’s misleading for a number of factors.

3153:

All I am saying is to keep an eye out just in case.

2622:

The Status of Women' in Indigenous African Societies

4692:

Don’t waste your time with pointless comments here.

3516:17-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 3 deficiency: 3474:

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/kallmann-syndrome

4802:I may just delete that whole section or fix it up. 4444:Male and female is defined by reproductive roles. 4317:https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html 3885:https://www.med.umich.edu/yourchild/topics/dsd.htm 734:: Destination is a stub article, lacks notability. 724:: Destination is a stub article, lacks notability. 714:: Destination is a stub article, lacks notability. 4431:I feel like this line should have a more context. 3500:https://fertilitypedia.org/edu/diagnoses/anorchia 2545:"When do children develop their gender identity?" 440:Gender is male and female. You are born with it. 4885:stay. I would support removal of most or all of 2857:Semi-protected edit request on 16 September 2019 1439:. This discussion taking place is, in itself, a 4790:That Gender Taxonomy section has major issues. 4656:Gender and sex are two different things buddy. 4107:This isn’t about identity, social, or cultural. 3318:https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001180.htm 1477:there), and a source about languages dis/using 4893:which is similarly off-topic and sex-focused. 4015:(i.e., the state of being male, female, or an 1490:The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender 316:Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 3546:https://en.wikipedia.org/Aromatase_deficiency 3281:https://en.wikipedia.org/Klinefelter_syndrome 2005: 1970: 1934: 1914: 8: 3479:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Kallmann_syndrome 1997:it must be verifiable before you can add it. 4307:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9967/ 4154:The Knowledge article for intersex states " 351:Strucked edit by sock of banned Mikemikev. 4489: 3855: 3723: 3248:The following discussion has been closed. 3239: 3177: 3119: 2951: 923: 857: 781: 646: 641:Please fix definition, this makes no sense 620: 481:Semi-protected edit request on 2 July 2018 400:Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2018 379: 214: 4478:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/ 3574:https://en.wikipedia.org/XX_male_syndrome 3005:without providing evidence for your claim 1983:, which says that all assertions must be 3508:https://www.theturekclinic.com/anorchia/ 3413:Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome 3003:: accusing other editors of POV-pushing 4989:Who want’s to continue this discussion? 3862:2604:2D80:4C89:1A00:9DBD:4173:2F94:A31F 3495:“It affects one in 20,000 male births” 2535: 2002:Regarding the section topic, you said, 1943:Yes, that's true. You are referring to 4793:First, it uses only uses two sources. 4451:https://www.britannica.com/science/sex 4210: 4155: 4014: 4010: 3962: 3444:Mild androgen insensitivity syndrome: 2635:Women, Gender, and the Study of Africa 1283: 1245: 321:2A01:E35:8A8A:FEA0:E41A:AB6C:266F:5676 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1963:. What happens after that depends on 561:Edits to the article, 28 October 2018 7: 4516:#I have a issue with a specific line 4104:Like I said and I’ll say this again. 3425:“1 in 99,000 male infants are born” 3398:Persistent Mullerian duct syndrome: 4817:On the biological factors and views 3452:“MAIS is only diagnosed in males.” 3388:https://en.wikipedia.org/Freemartin 3168:I have a issue with a specific line 1166:Gender#Non-binary and third genders 1121:". I don't know that "those who do 847:Bias in introduction and throughout 442:2601:641:2:3D30:6598:B06E:3CCC:F76E 3625:an infant assigned female at birth 2976:This could be political motivated. 1242:), then what about changing from: 1149:may already be pointing out here.) 614:Women in science under Gender page 24: 4080:would be willing to consider it. 3314:Androgen insensitivity syndrome: 3243:Copy-paste of various definition 3007:is considered a personal attack. 1979:No; that's a misunderstanding of 1310:; these are often referred to as 1268:. These are often referred to as 4707:neutrality no longer exists, sad 3959:The American Medical Association 3913:https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/SRY 3331:Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: 3297:Progestin-induced virilization: 2915: 2864: 2780:American Psychiatric Association 2761:or that what it states trumps a 1923:That's fully in accordance with 1240:in a page about the topic itself 772:: Destination covers two links ( 536: 488: 456: 407: 335:does care about reliable sources 29: 2689:Sorry about the faux signautre 4514:We've already been over this: 2940:08:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC) 2910:21:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 1580:, I wouldn't use "currently." 598:I agree with -sche's reverts. 1: 4780:05:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC) 4766:18:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC) 4751:22:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 4736:22:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 4721:22:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 4669:00:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 4651:23:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC) 4635:21:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC) 4526:for whatever you've proposed. 3570:The De La Chapelle syndrome: 1991:The distinction here, is the 1947:, here, which requires that " 635:18:37, 22 December 2018 (UTC) 136:11:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 121:09:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 4823:Biological factors and views 4702:06:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC) 4688:06:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC) 3163:02:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC) 3138:14:33, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 3113:09:20, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 3054:00:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 3031:18:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 3017:02:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 2994:16:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 2970:03:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 685:20:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 661:19:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC) 608:03:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC) 592:02:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC) 576:20:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC) 4821:I think some things in the 4786:The gender taxonomy section 4607:05:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC) 4578:05:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC) 4563:18:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC) 4549:05:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC) 4508:22:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC) 2891:to reactivate your request. 2879:has been answered. Set the 1284:Typically, societies use a 1162:Hijra_(Indian_subcontinent) 1033:Etymology and usage section 874:) 10:44, May 16, 2019 (UTC) 515:to reactivate your request. 503:has been answered. Set the 434:to reactivate your request. 422:has been answered. Set the 5135: 4825:needs to be moved over to 4425:17:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 4409:22:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC) 4385:22:40, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 4369:17:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 4277:03:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 4259:I just reverted CycoMa on 3201:I edited it intersex out. 2851:18:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC) 2833:18:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC) 1384:00:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 1370:16:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 1355:08:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 1336:22:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC) 1203:02:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 1181:00:59, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 1136:21:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 1093:02:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 841:03:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 347:16:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC) 329:09:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC) 289:12:09, 23 March 2018 (UTC) 261:08:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC) 204:08:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 169:02:59, 26 March 2018 (UTC) 5107:08:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 5097:Agree with this removal. 5093:05:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 5075:05:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 5045:05:26, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 5023:03:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 4999:19:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 4985:21:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4963:21:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4950:19:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4924:19:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4903:17:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4880:17:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4862:17:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4847:15:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 4255:20:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4241:16:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4227:15:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4204:08:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4168:07:19, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4146:03:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4127:03:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4090:02:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4064:01:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 4035:01:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 3995:22:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3964:known as intersex traits. 3933:19:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3904:17:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3870:06:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3832:06:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3772:06:24, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3742:06:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3692:06:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3648:06:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3615:05:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3368:5α-Reductase deficiency: 3226:05:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3211:01:21, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 3196:21:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 2804:03:54, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 2771:World Health Organization 2744:21:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC) 2721:20:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC) 2677:20:18, 16 June 2019 (UTC) 2495:19:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 2420:03:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 2389:00:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 2315:00:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 2029:21:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC) 1967:, i.e., this discussion. 1059:06:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 1027:22:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC) 817:18:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC) 800:17:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC) 184:22:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4831:gender is a sociological 4812:21:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC) 4245:That works for me, too. 3251:Please do not modify it. 1987:, not that they must be 1852:12:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC) 1831:23:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC) 1590:06:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 1012:17:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 973:17:48, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 942:17:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 913:20:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC) 890:13:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC) 555:05:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC) 530:05:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC) 475:09:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 450:09:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 394:10:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 361:15:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC) 209:I absolutely agree with 4359:Would that do for you? 2543:LoBue, Vanessa (2016). 1520:18:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 1458:11:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 1431:12:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 1417:00:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 1399:10:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC) 1045:, and probalby also in 307:04:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 233:14:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 151:04:35, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 3531:Aromatase deficiency: 3277:Klinefelter Syndrome: 2775:WP:In-text attribution 2410:in the right places. 2009: 1974: 1955:" must be attributed " 1938: 1918: 4023:neutral point of view 2794:report on me either. 1043:#Grammatical category 42:of past discussions. 1646:stated: The ancient 1437:verifiability policy 1039:#Etymology and usage 852:limited definition. 728:Gender sensitization 5085:Firefangledfeathers 5037:Firefangledfeathers 4895:Firefangledfeathers 4854:Firefangledfeathers 4835:sex is a biological 4391:Remark on citations 3556:cloacal exstrophy: 3459:Kallmann syndrome: 3037:This is also not a 2769:, we know that the 2633:Stoeltje, Beverly " 2620:Sudarkasa, Niara. " 2607:Greene, Sandra E. " 1280:to something like: 897:OED defined sense 3 718:Gender polarization 547:HickoryOughtShirt?4 3470:“Females with KS” 2646:Pearce, Tola Olu " 901:grammatical gender 708:Gender empowerment 691:Citation suggested 5081:a diff of my edit 5029:Sexual dimorphism 4887:Sexual dimorphism 4510: 4494:comment added by 3872: 3860:comment added by 3744: 3728:comment added by 3601: 3600: 3259:Turner Syndrome: 3198: 3182:comment added by 3140: 3124:comment added by 3069:assume good faith 2972: 2956:comment added by 2895: 2894: 2763:literature review 2759:Knowledge's voice 2753:or what I stated 1479:gendered pronouns 1288:of men and women 1214: 944: 928:comment added by 875: 862:comment added by 802: 786:comment added by 663: 651:comment added by 637: 625:comment added by 519: 518: 438: 437: 396: 384:comment added by 373:Gender Assignment 235: 219:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5126: 4961: 4922: 4778: 4561: 3988: 3985: 3982: 3979: 3825: 3822: 3819: 3816: 3765: 3762: 3759: 3756: 3685: 3682: 3679: 3676: 3641: 3638: 3635: 3632: 3253: 3240: 3073:reliable sources 3050: 3045: 2919: 2918: 2886: 2882: 2868: 2867: 2861: 2835:cbcoughl@aol.com 2710: 2706: 2700: 2688: 2651: 2644: 2638: 2631: 2625: 2618: 2612: 2605: 2599: 2585: 2579: 2572: 2566: 2559: 2553: 2552: 2549:The Conversation 2540: 2404: 2399: 1998: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1910: 1471: 1465: 1462:My edit added a 1205: 1005: 1002: 999: 996: 989: 966: 963: 960: 957: 864:‪202.85.51.141 ‬ 839: 544: 540: 539: 510: 506: 492: 491: 485: 464: 460: 459: 429: 425: 411: 410: 404: 355: 284: 283: 280: 277: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5134: 5133: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5125: 5124: 5123: 4955: 4916: 4819: 4788: 4772: 4709: 4676: 4622: 4555: 4520:WP:Undue weight 4433: 4393: 3986: 3983: 3980: 3977: 3961:resolved that " 3823: 3820: 3817: 3814: 3763: 3760: 3757: 3754: 3683: 3680: 3677: 3674: 3639: 3636: 3633: 3630: 3249: 3170: 3048: 3043: 2978: 2948: 2916: 2884: 2880: 2865: 2859: 2811: 2784:context matters 2708: 2704: 2698: 2682: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2645: 2641: 2632: 2628: 2619: 2615: 2606: 2602: 2587:Signe Arnfred, 2586: 2582: 2573: 2569: 2560: 2556: 2542: 2541: 2537: 2393: 1904: 1837:Regarding what 1642:Regarding what 1469: 1467:citation needed 1463: 1158:Gender#Religion 1066: 1035: 1003: 1000: 997: 994: 983: 981: 964: 961: 958: 955: 920: 849: 823: 701: 699:See-also links. 693: 643: 616: 563: 537: 535: 532: 508: 504: 489: 483: 457: 455: 427: 423: 408: 402: 375: 353: 281: 278: 275: 274: 241: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5132: 5130: 5122: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5054: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5001: 4987: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4938: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4905: 4865: 4864: 4818: 4815: 4787: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4739: 4738: 4708: 4705: 4675: 4672: 4654: 4653: 4627:NitroblastDigi 4621: 4618: 4616: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4599:Flyer22 Frozen 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4570:Flyer22 Frozen 4541:Flyer22 Frozen 4528: 4527: 4486: 4482: 4432: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4392: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4377:Flyer22 Frozen 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4269:Flyer22 Frozen 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4149: 4148: 4134: 4130: 4129: 4114: 4113: 4109: 4108: 4105: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4052: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3967: 3956: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3907: 3906: 3892: 3888: 3887: 3881: 3880: 3877: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3805: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3720: 3717: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3665: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3619:Please review 3599: 3598: 3590: 3581: 3567: 3553: 3550: 3528: 3519: 3515: 3512: 3498: 3489: 3483: 3458: 3455: 3443: 3440: 3431: 3416: 3412: 3409: 3395: 3383: 3380: 3371: 3365: 3353: 3350: 3347: 3328: 3325: 3311: 3308: 3294: 3288: 3276: 3262: 3255: 3254: 3245: 3244: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3229: 3228: 3169: 3166: 3116: 3115: 3101:Help:Footnotes 3084: 3057: 3056: 3035: 3034: 3033: 2977: 2974: 2947: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2893: 2892: 2869: 2858: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2810: 2807: 2796:Flyer22 Reborn 2747: 2746: 2723: 2660:User: Mathglot 2653: 2652: 2639: 2626: 2613: 2600: 2580: 2567: 2554: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2000: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1929:WP:CITECLUTTER 1921: 1920: 1919: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1644:Flyer22 Reborn 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1582:Flyer22 Reborn 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1486: 1433: 1376:Flyer22 Reborn 1347:Flyer22 Reborn 1342:WP:Sky is blue 1340:I think it is 1324: 1323: 1322: 1318:fourth genders 1278: 1277: 1276: 1235: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1207:Flyer22 Reborn 1169: 1150: 1147:Flyer22 Reborn 1139: 1138: 1112: 1085:Flyer22 Reborn 1065: 1062: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 980: 977: 976: 975: 930:Aristotele1982 919: 918:section biased 916: 893: 892: 848: 845: 844: 843: 819: 804: 803: 763: 749: 735: 725: 715: 700: 697: 692: 689: 688: 687: 677:Flyer22 Reborn 642: 639: 615: 612: 611: 610: 600:Flyer22 Reborn 595: 594: 562: 559: 558: 557: 522:117.226.179.12 520: 517: 516: 493: 482: 479: 478: 477: 436: 435: 412: 401: 398: 374: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 311: 310: 309: 240: 237: 207: 206: 196:Flyer22 Reborn 192:biological sex 161:58.165.149.119 156: 155: 154: 153: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5131: 5108: 5104: 5100: 5096: 5095: 5094: 5090: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5072: 5068: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5046: 5042: 5038: 5034: 5030: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5020: 5016: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5000: 4996: 4992: 4988: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4964: 4960: 4959: 4953: 4952: 4951: 4947: 4943: 4939: 4936: 4933: 4932: 4925: 4921: 4920: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4904: 4900: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4863: 4859: 4855: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4816: 4814: 4813: 4809: 4805: 4800: 4797: 4794: 4791: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4776: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4753: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4706: 4704: 4703: 4699: 4695: 4690: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4673: 4671: 4670: 4666: 4662: 4657: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4632: 4628: 4619: 4617: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4579: 4575: 4571: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4560: 4559: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4529: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4484: 4480: 4479: 4475: 4472: 4468: 4467: 4463: 4462: 4458: 4457: 4453: 4452: 4448: 4445: 4442: 4439: 4436: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4406: 4402: 4397: 4390: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4357: 4354: 4353: 4349: 4348: 4344: 4343: 4339: 4338: 4334: 4333: 4329: 4328: 4324: 4323: 4319: 4318: 4314: 4313: 4309: 4308: 4304: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4214: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4132: 4131: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4116: 4115: 4111: 4110: 4106: 4103: 4102: 4091: 4087: 4083: 4078: 4075: 4072:According to 4071: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4020: 4018: 4012: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 4003: 3996: 3993: 3990: 3989: 3973: 3968: 3965: 3960: 3957: 3954: 3951: 3948: 3945: 3940: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3890: 3889: 3886: 3883: 3882: 3878: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3833: 3830: 3827: 3826: 3809: 3808: 3806: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3773: 3770: 3767: 3766: 3750: 3746: 3745: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3721: 3718: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3693: 3690: 3687: 3686: 3669: 3668: 3666: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3649: 3646: 3643: 3642: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3597: 3594: 3593: 3588: 3585: 3584: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3568: 3565: 3562: 3561: 3557: 3554: 3551: 3548: 3547: 3543: 3540: 3537: 3536: 3532: 3529: 3526: 3523: 3522: 3517: 3513: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3502: 3501: 3496: 3493: 3492: 3487: 3484: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3475: 3471: 3468: 3465: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3453: 3450: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3438: 3435: 3434: 3429: 3426: 3423: 3420: 3419: 3414: 3410: 3407: 3404: 3403: 3399: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3369: 3366: 3363: 3360: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3348: 3345: 3344: 3340: 3337: 3336: 3332: 3329: 3326: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3306: 3303: 3302: 3298: 3295: 3292: 3291: 3286: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3273: 3269: 3266: 3265: 3260: 3257: 3256: 3252: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3241: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3199: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3173: 3167: 3165: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3151: 3148: 3145: 3141: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3085: 3082: 3081:bit of a pass 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3065:Verifiability 3062: 3059: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3046: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2982: 2975: 2973: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2945: 2941: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2927: 2922: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2900: 2890: 2887:parameter to 2878: 2874: 2870: 2863: 2862: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2821: 2816: 2813:According to 2806: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2724: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2703: 2696: 2692: 2686: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2664: 2661: 2649: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2584: 2581: 2577: 2571: 2568: 2564: 2558: 2555: 2550: 2546: 2539: 2536: 2532: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2408: 2403:tiny minority 2397: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2017: 2013: 2008: 2004: 2003: 2001: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1973: 1969: 1968: 1966: 1962: 1946: 1942: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1650:bhagavad gita 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1468: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1313:third genders 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1291: 1287: 1286:gender binary 1282: 1281: 1279: 1275: 1273: 1272: 1271:third genders 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1249: 1248:gender binary 1244: 1243: 1241: 1236: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1110: 1109:gender binary 1106: 1102: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1063: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1006: 987: 978: 974: 971: 968: 967: 951: 947: 946: 945: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 917: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 891: 887: 883: 878: 877: 876: 873: 869: 865: 861: 853: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 820: 818: 814: 810: 806: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 779: 775: 771: 767: 764: 761: 757: 753: 750: 747: 743: 739: 736: 733: 729: 726: 723: 719: 716: 713: 709: 706: 705: 704: 698: 696: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 665: 664: 662: 658: 654: 653:88.77.182.156 650: 640: 638: 636: 632: 628: 624: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 596: 593: 589: 585: 580: 579: 578: 577: 573: 569: 560: 556: 552: 548: 543: 534: 533: 531: 527: 523: 514: 511:parameter to 502: 498: 494: 487: 486: 480: 476: 472: 468: 463: 454: 453: 452: 451: 447: 443: 433: 430:parameter to 421: 417: 413: 406: 405: 399: 397: 395: 391: 387: 386:121.223.6.191 383: 372: 362: 359: 356: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 339:ArglebargleIV 336: 332: 331: 330: 326: 322: 317: 312: 308: 304: 300: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 287: 285: 270: 269: 267: 266: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 253:31.205.66.133 248: 247: 246: 238: 236: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 212: 205: 201: 197: 193: 188: 187: 186: 185: 181: 177: 171: 170: 166: 162: 152: 148: 144: 139: 138: 137: 133: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5032: 5028: 4957: 4918: 4908: 4890: 4886: 4834: 4833:thing while 4830: 4822: 4820: 4801: 4798: 4795: 4792: 4789: 4774: 4754: 4740: 4710: 4691: 4677: 4658: 4655: 4623: 4615: 4557: 4524:WP:Consensus 4490:— Preceding 4485: 4481: 4476: 4473: 4469: 4464: 4459: 4454: 4449: 4446: 4443: 4440: 4437: 4434: 4401:85.19.179.17 4398: 4394: 4358: 4355: 4350: 4345: 4340: 4335: 4330: 4325: 4320: 4315: 4310: 4305: 4300: 4296: 4293: 3976: 3856:— Preceding 3852: 3813: 3753: 3747:They have a 3724:— Preceding 3673: 3629: 3595: 3589: 3586: 3580: 3577: 3572: 3569: 3566: 3563: 3558: 3555: 3552: 3549: 3544: 3541: 3538: 3533: 3530: 3527: 3524: 3518: 3514: 3511: 3506: 3503: 3497: 3494: 3488: 3485: 3482: 3477: 3472: 3469: 3466: 3461: 3457: 3454: 3451: 3446: 3442: 3439: 3436: 3430: 3427: 3424: 3421: 3415: 3411: 3408: 3405: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3391: 3386: 3384:Freemartin: 3382: 3379: 3376: 3370: 3367: 3364: 3361: 3356: 3352: 3349: 3346: 3341: 3338: 3333: 3330: 3327: 3324: 3321: 3316: 3313: 3310: 3307: 3304: 3299: 3296: 3293: 3287: 3284: 3279: 3275: 3270: 3267: 3261: 3258: 3250: 3200: 3178:— Preceding 3174: 3171: 3152: 3149: 3146: 3142: 3120:— Preceding 3117: 3004: 2983: 2979: 2952:— Preceding 2949: 2935: 2930: 2925: 2920: 2896: 2888: 2873:edit request 2825:139.62.55.22 2819: 2818: 2812: 2748: 2665: 2658:This is for 2657: 2642: 2629: 2616: 2603: 2588: 2583: 2575: 2574:O. Oyěwùmí, 2570: 2562: 2557: 2548: 2538: 2530: 2407:WP:DUEWEIGHT 2006: 1988: 1984: 1971: 1935: 1915: 1647: 1500: 1489: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1404: 1317: 1311: 1299: 1293: 1289: 1269: 1255: 1251: 1231: 1195:gender roles 1122: 1118: 1114: 1104: 1100: 1081:WP:Synthesis 1071:, regarding 1067: 1047:#Social role 1036: 993: 982: 954: 924:— Preceding 921: 894: 882:Newimpartial 858:— Preceding 854: 850: 782:— Preceding 769: 755: 741: 731: 721: 711: 703:Suggested: 702: 694: 671:lead of the 647:— Preceding 644: 621:— Preceding 617: 564: 541: 512: 497:edit request 461: 439: 431: 416:edit request 380:— Preceding 376: 271: 268: 265: 250: 249: 243: 242: 215:— Preceding 211:Agendabender 208: 176:51.7.142.210 172: 157: 113:Agendabender 109: 78: 43: 37: 5033:Human brain 4891:Human brain 4758:Hastengeims 4713:Hastengeims 3103:. Thanks, 2732:WP:OVERCITE 2598:), page 186 2561:N. Nzegwu, 1655:Mahabharata 1574:WP:CITELEAD 1300:genderqueer 1257:genderqueer 979:Assessments 788:A145GI15I95 780:) in one. 627:24.72.56.83 354:Doug Weller 36:This is an 18:Talk:Gender 4958:Crossroads 4935:Crossroads 4919:Crossroads 4909:influenced 4775:Crossroads 4558:Crossroads 4215:variation) 4019:variation) 3486:Anorchia: 3354:Aphallia: 3009:Tgeorgescu 2881:|answered= 2823:incorrect. 2685:Ellesmelle 2669:Ellesmelle 2596:1847010350 2531:References 2307:Ellesmelle 2016:WP:BLUESKY 1993:WP:BLUESKY 1985:verifiable 1907:Ellesmelle 1844:Ellesmelle 1823:Ellesmelle 1653:epic poem 1508:1615372059 1497:1483384276 1450:Ellesmelle 1423:Ellesmelle 1421:Citation? 1391:Ellesmelle 1362:Ellesmelle 1308:South Asia 1295:non-binary 1266:South Asia 1252:non-binary 1186:Ellesmelle 1173:Ellesmelle 1119:non-binary 1115:non-binary 1069:Ellesmelle 905:Ellesmelle 568:SuperChris 505:|answered= 424:|answered= 333:Knowledge 98:Archive 10 4595:Third sex 3749:karyotype 3077:talk page 2902:JonesyPHD 2843:Ramos1990 2709:common.js 1989:verified. 1965:consensus 1945:WP:BURDEN 1441:challenge 1190:WP:Pinged 1019:Aquillion 986:Dthomsen8 903:article. 314:(remember 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 5099:Mathglot 4533:reverted 4531:Also, I 4504:contribs 4492:unsigned 4213:intersex 4074:interACT 4017:intersex 3939:citation 3858:unsigned 3738:contribs 3726:unsigned 3192:contribs 3180:unsigned 3134:contribs 3122:unsigned 3105:Mathglot 3039:WP:FORUM 2966:contribs 2954:unsigned 2923:Thanks! 2788:WP:Dated 2767:WP:MEDRS 2736:Mathglot 2713:Mathglot 2702:unsigned 2412:Mathglot 2405:(in the 2021:Mathglot 1578:WP:Dated 1405:intended 1051:Mathglot 938:contribs 926:unsigned 872:contribs 860:unsigned 807:Agreed. 796:contribs 784:unsigned 778:Misogyny 774:Misandry 770:Add/Keep 752:Misogyny 738:Misandry 649:unsigned 623:unsigned 542:Not done 467:Mathglot 462:Not done 382:unsigned 299:FaustoLG 229:contribs 217:unsigned 143:FaustoLG 128:CIreland 4537:WP:Talk 4247:Useight 4233:Kaldari 4219:Useight 4160:Useight 4082:Kaldari 4027:Useight 3218:Useight 3097:WP:CITE 3049:Neonate 3023:Useight 2931:Vampire 2728:WP:RSNB 2591:(2011, 1925:WP:LEAD 1765:Eunuchs 1503:(2018, 1492:(2017, 1483:genders 1320:, etc). 1079:, it's 825:Mooeena 809:Kaldari 673:Atheism 669:current 221:Bzzzing 39:archive 5067:CycoMa 5015:CycoMa 4991:CycoMa 4977:CycoMa 4942:CycoMa 4872:CycoMa 4839:CycoMa 4804:CycoMa 4743:CycoMa 4694:CycoMa 4680:Hido F 4661:CycoMa 4496:CycoMa 4361:CycoMa 4196:CycoMa 4138:CycoMa 4119:CycoMa 4069:birth. 4056:CycoMa 3992:(talk) 3925:CycoMa 3896:CycoMa 3829:(talk) 3769:(talk) 3730:CycoMa 3689:(talk) 3645:(talk) 3607:CycoMa 3203:CycoMa 3184:CycoMa 3155:CycoMa 3126:CycoMa 3099:, and 3061:CycoMa 3001:WP:NPA 2986:CycoMa 2958:CycoMa 2877:Gender 2792:WP:ANI 2578:(1997) 2565:(2012) 1570:change 1304:hijras 1262:hijras 1009:(talk) 970:(talk) 766:Sexism 760:Sexism 756:Remove 746:Sexism 742:Remove 732:Remove 722:Remove 712:Remove 501:Gender 420:Gender 4728:Rab V 4674:Truth 4643:Rab V 4417:Rab V 4009:Re: " 3944:WP:OR 3621:WP:RS 3093:WP:RS 3044:Paleo 2936:Heart 2885:|ans= 2871:This 2841:role. 2487:-sche 2396:-sche 2381:-sche 1839:-sche 1648:text 1512:-sche 1446:-sche 1409:-sche 1328:-sche 1316:(and 1153:-sche 1128:-sche 584:-sche 509:|ans= 495:This 428:|ans= 414:This 337:. -- 106:Bias. 16:< 5103:talk 5089:talk 5071:talk 5041:talk 5031:and 5019:talk 4995:talk 4981:talk 4946:talk 4899:talk 4876:talk 4858:talk 4843:talk 4808:talk 4762:talk 4747:talk 4732:talk 4717:talk 4698:talk 4684:talk 4665:talk 4647:talk 4631:talk 4603:talk 4574:talk 4545:talk 4500:talk 4421:talk 4405:talk 4381:talk 4365:talk 4273:talk 4265:this 4261:this 4251:talk 4237:talk 4223:talk 4200:talk 4164:talk 4142:talk 4123:talk 4086:talk 4060:talk 4031:talk 3937:The 3929:talk 3900:talk 3866:talk 3734:talk 3611:talk 3234:Okay 3222:talk 3207:talk 3188:talk 3159:talk 3130:talk 3109:talk 3089:WP:V 3027:talk 3013:talk 2999:See 2990:talk 2962:talk 2926:Nici 2921:Done 2906:talk 2847:talk 2829:talk 2800:talk 2755:here 2751:this 2740:talk 2717:talk 2695:here 2691:here 2673:talk 2593:ISBN 2491:talk 2416:talk 2385:talk 2311:talk 2303:here 2025:talk 1981:WP:V 1961:WP:V 1848:talk 1827:talk 1586:talk 1516:talk 1505:ISBN 1494:ISBN 1454:talk 1427:talk 1413:talk 1395:talk 1380:talk 1366:talk 1351:talk 1332:talk 1211:talk 1199:talk 1177:talk 1160:and 1132:talk 1089:talk 1077:this 1075:and 1073:this 1055:talk 1023:talk 950:here 934:talk 909:talk 886:talk 868:talk 813:talk 792:talk 776:and 681:talk 657:talk 631:talk 604:talk 588:talk 572:talk 551:talk 526:talk 471:talk 446:talk 390:talk 358:talk 343:talk 325:talk 303:talk 257:talk 225:talk 200:talk 180:talk 165:talk 147:talk 132:talk 117:talk 4913:sex 4827:sex 4025:. 3987:Fir 3984:een 3981:rgr 3978:Eve 3972:POV 3824:Fir 3821:een 3818:rgr 3815:Eve 3764:Fir 3761:een 3758:rgr 3755:Eve 3684:Fir 3681:een 3678:rgr 3675:Eve 3640:Fir 3637:een 3634:rgr 3631:Eve 2883:or 2875:to 1475:was 1306:of 1298:or 1264:of 1254:or 1232:not 1123:not 1105:or 1004:Fir 1001:een 998:rgr 995:Eve 965:Fir 962:een 959:rgr 956:Eve 507:or 499:to 426:or 418:to 5105:) 5091:) 5083:. 5073:) 5043:) 5021:) 4997:) 4983:) 4948:) 4901:) 4878:) 4860:) 4845:) 4810:) 4764:) 4749:) 4734:) 4719:) 4700:) 4686:) 4667:) 4649:) 4633:) 4605:) 4576:) 4547:) 4506:) 4502:• 4423:) 4407:) 4383:) 4367:) 4275:) 4253:) 4239:) 4225:) 4202:) 4166:) 4144:) 4125:) 4088:) 4062:) 4033:) 3974:. 3955:). 3952:, 3949:, 3931:) 3902:) 3868:) 3740:) 3736:• 3627:. 3613:) 3224:) 3209:) 3194:) 3190:• 3161:) 3136:) 3132:• 3111:) 3095:, 3091:, 3052:– 3029:) 3015:) 2992:) 2968:) 2964:• 2908:) 2889:no 2849:) 2831:) 2802:) 2742:) 2719:) 2705:}} 2699:{{ 2675:) 2667:-- 2547:. 2493:) 2418:) 2387:) 2313:) 2027:) 1850:) 1829:) 1588:) 1518:) 1470:}} 1464:{{ 1456:) 1429:) 1415:) 1397:) 1382:) 1368:) 1353:) 1334:) 1201:) 1179:) 1134:) 1101:of 1091:) 1057:) 1025:) 952:. 940:) 936:• 911:) 888:) 870:• 835:● 833:✒️ 831:● 829:💌 827:● 815:) 798:) 794:• 768:- 754:- 740:- 730:- 720:- 710:- 683:) 659:) 633:) 606:) 590:) 574:) 553:) 528:) 513:no 473:) 448:) 432:no 392:) 345:) 327:) 305:) 259:) 231:) 227:• 202:) 182:) 167:) 149:) 134:) 119:) 94:→ 64:← 5101:( 5087:( 5069:( 5039:( 5017:( 4993:( 4979:( 4944:( 4897:( 4874:( 4856:( 4841:( 4806:( 4760:( 4745:( 4730:( 4715:( 4696:( 4682:( 4663:( 4645:( 4629:( 4601:( 4572:( 4543:( 4498:( 4419:( 4403:( 4379:( 4363:( 4271:( 4249:( 4235:( 4221:( 4209:" 4198:( 4162:( 4140:( 4121:( 4084:( 4058:( 4029:( 3966:" 3927:( 3898:( 3864:( 3732:( 3609:( 3220:( 3205:( 3186:( 3157:( 3128:( 3107:( 3025:( 3011:( 2988:( 2960:( 2904:( 2845:( 2827:( 2798:( 2738:( 2715:( 2687:: 2683:@ 2671:( 2551:. 2489:( 2414:( 2398:: 2394:@ 2383:( 2309:( 2023:( 1909:: 1905:@ 1846:( 1825:( 1763:" 1584:( 1514:( 1485:. 1452:( 1425:( 1411:( 1393:( 1378:( 1364:( 1349:( 1330:( 1274:. 1213:) 1209:( 1175:( 1168:. 1130:( 1087:( 1053:( 1021:( 988:: 984:@ 932:( 907:( 884:( 866:( 837:❓ 811:( 790:( 762:. 748:. 679:( 655:( 629:( 602:( 586:( 570:( 549:( 524:( 469:( 444:( 388:( 341:( 323:( 301:( 282:G 279:M 276:G 255:( 223:( 198:( 178:( 163:( 145:( 130:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index