771:
1037:
493:
755:
289:
787:
1147:
739:
815:
429:
331:
1097:
984:
973:
962:
951:
940:
1400:. Some examples of 4.5 gen variants that don't have their own wiki pages are the Su-30SM, the Saab Gripen E/F, the JF-17 Block 3, and the Eurofighter Typhoon Tranches 3 & 4. A good guideline for notability may be if the media and government sources start referring to the F-16V as a significantly different aircraft from older versions (as they do for the F-15E Strike Eagle and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet).
1057:
912:
608:
832:
215:
723:
846:
247:
484:
856:
680:
669:
658:
647:
566:
526:
636:
1426:
F-16 line, but rather the result of decades of gradual improvements. The MiG-35 and MiG-29M, on the other hand, were themselves major leaps in technology that set them apart from any previous variants, with the MiG-35 being considered a new type altogether. This, coupled with the length of the main
1425:
As TROPtastic points out, there is already a variants article for the F-16 that takes care of the length issue. The F-16 Block 70/72 is no more different from the Block 50/52 than the Block 50/52 was from the Block 1. It is not a major leap in technology that makes it vastly different from the main
1578:
If you find a decently reliable source that indicates the current production total (and doesn't double-count refurbished airframes), you should add it to the article! As to your question about why some 2,400 F-16s aren't operational, if boils down to several factors: some airframes are get too worn
1238:
Several editors have added a "Future operators" section for
Ukraine. Bulgaria and Slovakia were also added in the most recent case. The addition of the section has repeatedly been reverted as there is no consensus to include such sections in military aircraft articles apart from the occasional
1381:
There are significant differences between a 1978 and a 2023 fighter. In fact it evolved into a completely different item. For reference you can consider the eligibility of MiG-35 or MiG-29M for their own pages compared to the MiG-29. It will also relieve some data load of the F-16 page.
1553:
Should number of produced aircrafts need to be updated in 2024? That number from 2018 probably obsolete by now. I watched on YouTube yesterday that currently there is a long line of orders on F-16, so some nations does not want to wait long and order korean FA-50 block 20
1407:: "Rather than creating separate articles for each subtype of an aircraft, it is common to create a combined article on all variants of an aircraft, treating them in more detail than the summary "Variants" section in the major article about a type." We already have a
746:
540:
1511:
We have the quantity built included in the "main" Info box. How about a quantity active? Certainly many older F-16 are NON operational is some form. Could the quantity built have any false high reports - perhaps from ungrades of existing airframes.
778:
548:
1531:
in June 2018 that "4,604 F-16s have been procured by 28 customers around the world". It is highly unlikely that this figure is inflated by upgrades to existing airframes, as such upgrades do not result in a new manufacturer serial number. -
1070:
794:
552:
1603:
Unsure of where the
Ukrainian F-16 loss would fit best, operational history or notable accidents and incidents. I’ve added it into operational history for now, but might move it depending on what the investigation states or add it to both.
153:
1196:
also didn't even use "F-16V Block 70/72", and instead used "F-16V", "F-16 Block 70/72", or "F-16C/D Block 70/72". See the reference below. If you have reliable sources yourself that it's stated as "F-16V Block 70/72", please reply.
1294:
Operators with aircraft on firm order do not have to be separated as Future operators. A future user with a firm order is effectively an operator. WP:Air does not do this in any other aircraft article that I am aware of. Regards
416:
1782:
397:
730:
536:
359:
1777:
1579:
out to ever fly again (metal fatigue is a dangerous thing), some F-16s have been written off for damages, and still others may be in deep storage due to obsolescence (some F-16s are around 50 years old). ~
1674:
The accident involved the death of a person of sufficient individual notability to have their own biography page in
Knowledge (and the biography is not solely due to them being an accident victim), or
1480:
as either reliable or unreliable, so there are currently no grounds to exclude it. If you believe that Taiwan News or any other source used in this article is unreliable, feel free to bring it up at
44:
1802:
1656:
1812:
147:
762:
544:
1797:
1807:
1752:
1679:
The accident resulted in a significant change to the aircraft design or aviation operations, including changes to national or company procedures, regulations or issuance of an
202:
198:
194:
190:
206:
1461:
If all chinese sources and taiwanese media are excluded, are there any official sources (or other sources) that prove taiwan "invested" in the development of the F-16V?
621:
578:
1619:
If it is not a combat related loss, then probably accidents section. However accidents for combat aircraft generally need to be significant or noteworty to be covered.
1239:"Potential operators" section. Since the number of attempts to add the section have risen over the last few days, it's probably worth having a formal discussion. -
1742:
1832:
1772:
1408:
378:
1757:
925:
911:
607:
1767:
1655:. They account for many more accidents and incidents than larger civil aircraft. Military aircraft accidents may be suitable for inclusion in the relevant
497:
1528:
1762:
1065:
79:
1659:. For accidents involving light aircraft (maximum gross weight of 12,500 lb (5,670 kg) or less) or any military aircraft the standard for inclusion is:
1842:
1737:
1360:
for subtypes and variants. Sure, they're newer, but being classified as 4.5th generation fighters does not mean that they need their own article. -
168:
1747:
135:
1837:
1827:
573:
531:
1792:
1727:
1105:
582:
271:
259:
85:
24:
1633:
Fnlayson is correct. If it's not a combat loss, then it usually goes in the "Accidents and incidents" section if it is noteworthy. Per
1557:
Also If more that 4604 was produced and 2145 F-16s operational, then what happened with more than 2400 of F-16 that is not operational?
1462:
1193:
315:
129:
1822:
1817:
1787:
310:
1338:
F-16V Block 70/72 Vipers are 4.5 gen fighters. There should be a different page on that. E/F versions can be also transferred there.
886:
125:
1562:
457:
439:
267:
1732:
1722:
453:
449:
445:
306:
300:
254:
99:
30:
1046:
868:
825:
820:
263:
175:
104:
20:
74:
506:
65:
873:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
214:
185:
141:
288:
1573:
1558:
225:
874:
275:
1466:
1680:
577:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
109:
305:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
770:
512:
1701:
1628:
1613:
1588:
1566:
1548:
1521:
1500:
1470:
1446:
1420:
1391:
1376:
1347:
1327:
1304:
1288:
1255:
1206:
428:
330:
270:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about
1416:
1387:
1383:
1353:
1343:
1339:
1323:
1101:
1036:
483:
1315:
161:
55:
1634:
1624:
1609:
1300:
230:
229:
70:
1584:
1202:
1159:
51:
227:
754:
1517:
1412:
1404:
1357:
1319:
1269:
880:
861:
1411:
for the F-16 that has seen extensive work and puts all the variants detail in one place.
1692:
1539:
1491:
1437:
1427:
1367:
1279:
1246:
1146:
1716:
1650:
1620:
1605:
1481:
1477:
1296:
1192:
The references listed beside the "F-16V Block 70/72" didn't even use that term. The
1580:
1476:
Why would
Chinese and Taiwanese sources be excluded? Taiwan News is not listed in
1265:
1198:
845:
814:
786:
831:
1261:
1187:
1056:
738:
1513:
1223:
851:
1686:
1533:
1485:
1431:
1397:
1361:
1311:
1273:
1240:
1165:
Shorten wording where main articles exist. Shorten/summarize long sections.
433:
722:
1683:(or the equivalent to an AD in the case of non-certified aircraft).
565:
525:
1430:
article, made them prime candidates for their own articles. -
1087:
477:
241:
231:
15:
1783:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
1055:
1035:
910:
785:
769:
753:
737:
721:
606:
309:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
1657:
List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft
1778:
C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
1457:
About taiwan "invested" in the development of the F-16V
1129:
1123:
1117:
1111:
997:
409:
390:
371:
352:
160:
432:
Facts from this article were featured on
Knowledge's
619:
This article has been checked against the following
319:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
1803:
North
American military history task force articles
922:
747:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
704:
618:
1813:United States military history task force articles
923:This article has not yet been checked against the
1798:C-Class North American military history articles
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1808:C-Class United States military history articles
1753:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Technology
1023:assessing the article against each criterion.
174:
8:
1224:https://www.dsca.mil/search/node?keys=F-16V
1154:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
1019:| b5<!--Supporting materials --: -->
1015:| b4<!--Grammar and style --: -->
1011:| b3<!--Structure --: -->
1007:| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --: -->
1003:| b1<!--Referencing and citation--: -->
919:
809:
779:North American military history task force
701:
615:
520:
324:
283:
795:United States military history task force
1599:Where would the Ukrainian F-16 loss fit?
1000:the following code to the template call:
867:This article is within the scope of the
571:This article is within the scope of the
1216:
811:
522:
481:
1743:Knowledge vital articles in Technology
1678:
1673:
1640:
885:. To use this banner, please see the
591:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
581:. To use this banner, please see the
1833:Old requests for aviation peer review
1773:Military aviation task force articles
1106:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
594:Template:WikiProject Military history
295:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
272:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
260:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
25:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
7:
1758:C-Class vital articles in Technology
1403:However, even if this happens, per
1194:Defense Security Cooperation Agency
996:To fill out this checklist, please
23:for discussing improvements to the
1768:C-Class military aviation articles
14:
1763:C-Class military history articles
1843:Knowledge pages with to-do lists
1738:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1145:
1095:
982:
971:
960:
949:
938:
854:
844:
830:
813:
678:
667:
656:
645:
634:
564:
524:
491:
482:
427:
329:
287:
245:
213:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1748:C-Class level-5 vital articles
895:Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation
511:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1838:WikiProject Aviation articles
1828:WikiProject Aircraft articles
1447:18:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
1421:18:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
1392:18:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
1377:15:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
1348:07:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
1044:This article is supported by
898:Template:WikiProject Aviation
258:for general discussion about
42:Put new text under old text.
1793:Weaponry task force articles
1728:Old requests for peer review
1549:02:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
1522:00:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
1501:04:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
1471:03:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
1356:I'm not sure that they meet
1328:03:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
731:Military aviation task force
574:Military history WikiProject
1702:23:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1629:21:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1614:21:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1527:Lockheed Martin themselves
1305:16:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
1289:05:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
1256:05:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1859:
1207:06:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
943:Referencing and citation:
639:Referencing and citation:
360:Featured article candidate
313:. Editors may also seek a
1823:C-Class aircraft articles
1818:C-Class aviation articles
1788:C-Class weaponry articles
1063:
1043:
839:
793:
777:
761:
745:
729:
700:
597:military history articles
559:
519:
464:
426:
417:Good article reassessment
327:
323:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1589:13:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
1567:12:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
1681:Airworthiness Directive
1064:This article has had a
954:Coverage and accuracy:
705:Associated task forces:
650:Coverage and accuracy:
1733:C-Class vital articles
1723:Delisted good articles
1574:Slavic Positron Cannon
1559:Slavic Positron Cannon
1060:
1040:
987:Supporting materials:
915:
790:
774:
758:
742:
726:
683:Supporting materials:
611:
75:avoid personal attacks
1059:
1039:
914:
789:
773:
757:
741:
725:
610:
498:level-5 vital article
467:Delisted good article
307:good article criteria
301:Warfare good articles
207:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1641:Accidents involving
1047:the aircraft project
870:Aviation WikiProject
379:Good article nominee
262:. Any such comments
105:No original research
976:Grammar and style:
929:for B-class status:
763:Weaponry task force
672:Grammar and style:
625:for B-class status:
1135:Updated 2011-06-04
1061:
1041:
916:
791:
775:
759:
743:
727:
612:
579:list of open tasks
507:content assessment
335:Article milestones
257:
86:dispute resolution
47:
1647:military aircraft
1178:
1177:
1172:
1171:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1030:
1029:
1020:= <yes/no: -->
1016:= <yes/no: -->
1012:= <yes/no: -->
1008:= <yes/no: -->
1004:= <yes/no: -->
901:aviation articles
887:full instructions
808:
807:
804:
803:
800:
799:
696:
695:
641:criterion not met
583:full instructions
476:
475:
472:
471:
282:
281:
253:
238:
237:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1850:
1700:
1695:
1689:
1577:
1547:
1542:
1536:
1507:Quantity of F-16
1499:
1494:
1488:
1445:
1440:
1434:
1409:Variants article
1375:
1370:
1364:
1287:
1282:
1276:
1254:
1249:
1243:
1234:Future operators
1226:
1221:
1191:
1149:
1142:
1141:
1136:
1099:
1098:
1088:
1024:
990:
986:
985:
979:
975:
974:
968:
964:
963:
957:
953:
952:
946:
942:
941:
920:
903:
902:
899:
896:
893:
864:
859:
858:
857:
848:
841:
840:
835:
834:
833:
828:
817:
810:
712:
702:
686:
682:
681:
675:
671:
670:
664:
660:
659:
653:
649:
648:
642:
638:
637:
616:
599:
598:
595:
592:
589:
588:Military history
568:
561:
560:
555:
532:Military history
528:
521:
504:
495:
494:
487:
486:
478:
465:Current status:
458:February 2, 2024
454:February 2, 2019
450:February 2, 2016
446:February 2, 2012
431:
412:
393:
374:
355:
353:January 28, 2006
334:
333:
325:
291:
284:
249:
248:
242:
232:
218:
217:
208:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1713:
1712:
1698:
1697:
1693:
1687:
1601:
1571:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1534:
1509:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1486:
1459:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1432:
1373:
1372:
1368:
1362:
1336:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1274:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1222:
1218:
1185:
1183:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1110:
1096:
995:
988:
983:
977:
972:
966:
961:
955:
950:
944:
939:
900:
897:
894:
891:
890:
862:Aviation portal
860:
855:
853:
829:
823:
710:
684:
679:
673:
668:
662:
657:
651:
646:
640:
635:
596:
593:
590:
587:
586:
534:
505:on Knowledge's
502:
492:
408:
389:
370:
351:
328:
297:was one of the
246:
234:
233:
228:
205:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1856:
1854:
1846:
1845:
1840:
1835:
1830:
1825:
1820:
1815:
1810:
1805:
1800:
1795:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1725:
1715:
1714:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1691:
1676:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1643:light aircraft
1638:
1600:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1555:
1538:
1508:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1490:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1436:
1428:Mikoyan MiG-29
1423:
1401:
1366:
1335:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1314:I concur with
1308:
1307:
1278:
1245:
1235:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1153:
1151:
1150:
1138:
1093:
1091:
1084:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1062:
1052:
1051:
1042:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
993:
992:
991:
980:
969:
958:
947:
933:
932:
930:
917:
907:
906:
904:
866:
865:
849:
837:
836:
818:
806:
805:
802:
801:
798:
797:
792:
782:
781:
776:
766:
765:
760:
750:
749:
744:
734:
733:
728:
718:
717:
715:
713:
707:
706:
698:
697:
694:
693:
691:
689:
688:
687:
676:
665:
654:
643:
629:
628:
626:
613:
603:
602:
600:
569:
557:
556:
529:
517:
516:
510:
488:
474:
473:
470:
469:
462:
461:
440:On this day...
424:
423:
420:
413:
410:March 21, 2023
405:
404:
401:
394:
391:April 24, 2011
386:
385:
382:
375:
367:
366:
363:
356:
348:
347:
344:
341:
337:
336:
321:
320:
292:
280:
279:
276:Reference desk
264:may be removed
250:
236:
235:
226:
224:
223:
220:
219:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1855:
1844:
1841:
1839:
1836:
1834:
1831:
1829:
1826:
1824:
1821:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1796:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1726:
1724:
1721:
1720:
1718:
1703:
1696:
1690:
1684:
1682:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1660:
1658:
1654:
1653:
1652:non-prominent
1648:
1644:
1639:
1636:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1598:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1575:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1543:
1537:
1530:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1506:
1502:
1495:
1489:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1463:14.199.160.12
1456:
1448:
1441:
1435:
1429:
1424:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1396:I agree with
1395:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1371:
1365:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1283:
1277:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1258:
1257:
1250:
1244:
1233:
1225:
1220:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1195:
1189:
1180:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1107:
1103:
1092:
1090:
1089:
1073:
1072:
1067:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1026:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
1001:
999:
994:
981:
970:
959:
948:
937:
936:
935:
934:
931:
928:
927:
921:
918:
913:
909:
908:
905:
888:
884:
883:
878:
877:
872:
871:
863:
852:
850:
847:
843:
842:
838:
827:
822:
819:
816:
812:
796:
788:
784:
783:
780:
772:
768:
767:
764:
756:
752:
751:
748:
740:
736:
735:
732:
724:
720:
719:
716:
714:
709:
708:
703:
699:
692:
690:
685:criterion met
677:
674:criterion met
666:
663:criterion met
655:
652:criterion met
644:
633:
632:
631:
630:
627:
624:
623:
617:
614:
609:
605:
604:
601:
584:
580:
576:
575:
570:
567:
563:
562:
558:
554:
553:United States
550:
549:North America
546:
542:
538:
533:
530:
527:
523:
518:
514:
508:
500:
499:
489:
485:
480:
479:
468:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
441:
435:
430:
425:
421:
419:
418:
414:
411:
407:
406:
402:
400:
399:
395:
392:
388:
387:
383:
381:
380:
376:
373:
372:April 7, 2011
369:
368:
364:
362:
361:
357:
354:
350:
349:
345:
342:
339:
338:
332:
326:
322:
318:
317:
312:
308:
304:
303:
302:
296:
293:
290:
286:
285:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
256:
252:This page is
251:
244:
243:
240:
222:
221:
216:
212:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1651:
1646:
1642:
1602:
1510:
1460:
1337:
1259:
1237:
1219:
1211:
1184:
1158:
1157:
1139:
1132:
1126:
1120:
1114:
1100:
1094:
1071:now archived
1069:
1045:
924:
881:
875:
869:
620:
572:
513:WikiProjects
496:
466:
437:
415:
396:
377:
365:Not promoted
358:
316:reassessment
314:
299:
298:
294:
239:
210:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1649:are mostly
1635:WP:AIRCRASH
1334:New Article
1066:peer review
989:not checked
978:not checked
967:not checked
965:Structure:
956:not checked
945:not checked
882:task forces
661:Structure:
398:Peer review
311:renominated
255:not a forum
148:free images
31:not a forum
1717:Categories
1413:TROPtastic
1384:Shahed0078
1354:Shahed0078
1340:Shahed0078
1320:The Legacy
1270:The Legacy
1212:References
1102:To-do list
876:open tasks
541:Technology
444:column on
268:refactored
1621:-Fnlayson
1297:-Fnlayson
1068:which is
501:is rated
434:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1606:Sterge08
1554:instead.
1405:WP:AIR/N
1358:WP:AIR/N
1316:Fylayson
1260:Pinging
926:criteria
892:Aviation
826:Aircraft
821:Aviation
622:criteria
545:Weaponry
537:Aviation
422:Delisted
403:Reviewed
211:365 days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1581:Pbritti
1266:Poklane
1199:RPC7778
1160:Cleanup
1130:refresh
1118:history
503:C-class
436:in the
343:Process
274:at the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1529:stated
1482:WP:RSN
1478:WP:RSP
1268:, and
1262:BilCat
1188:BilCat
509:scale.
456:, and
384:Listed
346:Result
126:Google
1514:Wfoj3
1181:F-16V
1124:watch
490:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1688:ZLEA
1645:and
1625:talk
1610:talk
1585:talk
1563:talk
1535:ZLEA
1518:talk
1487:ZLEA
1484:. -
1467:talk
1433:ZLEA
1417:talk
1398:ZLEA
1388:talk
1363:ZLEA
1344:talk
1324:talk
1312:ZLEA
1301:talk
1275:ZLEA
1272:. -
1242:ZLEA
1203:talk
1112:edit
1104:for
879:and
340:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
998:add
266:or
176:TWL
1719::
1685:-
1627:)
1612:)
1587:)
1565:)
1520:)
1469:)
1419:)
1390:)
1346:)
1326:)
1318:.
1303:)
1264:,
1205:)
824::
711:/
551:/
547:/
543:/
539:/
535::
452:,
448:,
209::
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
1699:\
1694:T
1637::
1623:(
1608:(
1583:(
1576::
1572:@
1561:(
1546:\
1541:T
1516:(
1498:\
1493:T
1465:(
1444:\
1439:T
1415:(
1386:(
1374:\
1369:T
1342:(
1322:(
1299:(
1286:\
1281:T
1253:\
1248:T
1201:(
1190::
1186:@
1163::
1133:·
1127:·
1121:·
1115:·
1108::
1074:.
1050:.
889:.
585:.
515:.
460:.
442:"
438:"
278:.
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.