Knowledge

Talk:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

Source 📝

771: 1037: 493: 755: 289: 787: 1147: 739: 815: 429: 331: 1097: 984: 973: 962: 951: 940: 1400:. Some examples of 4.5 gen variants that don't have their own wiki pages are the Su-30SM, the Saab Gripen E/F, the JF-17 Block 3, and the Eurofighter Typhoon Tranches 3 & 4. A good guideline for notability may be if the media and government sources start referring to the F-16V as a significantly different aircraft from older versions (as they do for the F-15E Strike Eagle and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet). 1057: 912: 608: 832: 215: 723: 846: 247: 484: 856: 680: 669: 658: 647: 566: 526: 636: 1426:
F-16 line, but rather the result of decades of gradual improvements. The MiG-35 and MiG-29M, on the other hand, were themselves major leaps in technology that set them apart from any previous variants, with the MiG-35 being considered a new type altogether. This, coupled with the length of the main
1425:
As TROPtastic points out, there is already a variants article for the F-16 that takes care of the length issue. The F-16 Block 70/72 is no more different from the Block 50/52 than the Block 50/52 was from the Block 1. It is not a major leap in technology that makes it vastly different from the main
1578:
If you find a decently reliable source that indicates the current production total (and doesn't double-count refurbished airframes), you should add it to the article! As to your question about why some 2,400 F-16s aren't operational, if boils down to several factors: some airframes are get too worn
1238:
Several editors have added a "Future operators" section for Ukraine. Bulgaria and Slovakia were also added in the most recent case. The addition of the section has repeatedly been reverted as there is no consensus to include such sections in military aircraft articles apart from the occasional
1381:
There are significant differences between a 1978 and a 2023 fighter. In fact it evolved into a completely different item. For reference you can consider the eligibility of MiG-35 or MiG-29M for their own pages compared to the MiG-29. It will also relieve some data load of the F-16 page.
1553:
Should number of produced aircrafts need to be updated in 2024? That number from 2018 probably obsolete by now. I watched on YouTube yesterday that currently there is a long line of orders on F-16, so some nations does not want to wait long and order korean FA-50 block 20
1407:: "Rather than creating separate articles for each subtype of an aircraft, it is common to create a combined article on all variants of an aircraft, treating them in more detail than the summary "Variants" section in the major article about a type." We already have a 746: 540: 1511:
We have the quantity built included in the "main" Info box. How about a quantity active? Certainly many older F-16 are NON operational is some form. Could the quantity built have any false high reports - perhaps from ungrades of existing airframes.
778: 548: 1531:
in June 2018 that "4,604 F-16s have been procured by 28 customers around the world". It is highly unlikely that this figure is inflated by upgrades to existing airframes, as such upgrades do not result in a new manufacturer serial number. -
1070: 794: 552: 1603:
Unsure of where the Ukrainian F-16 loss would fit best, operational history or notable accidents and incidents. I’ve added it into operational history for now, but might move it depending on what the investigation states or add it to both.
153: 1196:
also didn't even use "F-16V Block 70/72", and instead used "F-16V", "F-16 Block 70/72", or "F-16C/D Block 70/72". See the reference below. If you have reliable sources yourself that it's stated as "F-16V Block 70/72", please reply.
1294:
Operators with aircraft on firm order do not have to be separated as Future operators. A future user with a firm order is effectively an operator. WP:Air does not do this in any other aircraft article that I am aware of. Regards
416: 1782: 397: 730: 536: 359: 1777: 1579:
out to ever fly again (metal fatigue is a dangerous thing), some F-16s have been written off for damages, and still others may be in deep storage due to obsolescence (some F-16s are around 50 years old). ~
1674:
The accident involved the death of a person of sufficient individual notability to have their own biography page in Knowledge (and the biography is not solely due to them being an accident victim), or
1480:
as either reliable or unreliable, so there are currently no grounds to exclude it. If you believe that Taiwan News or any other source used in this article is unreliable, feel free to bring it up at
44: 1802: 1656: 1812: 147: 762: 544: 1797: 1807: 1752: 1679:
The accident resulted in a significant change to the aircraft design or aviation operations, including changes to national or company procedures, regulations or issuance of an
202: 198: 194: 190: 206: 1461:
If all chinese sources and taiwanese media are excluded, are there any official sources (or other sources) that prove taiwan "invested" in the development of the F-16V?
621: 578: 1619:
If it is not a combat related loss, then probably accidents section. However accidents for combat aircraft generally need to be significant or noteworty to be covered.
1239:"Potential operators" section. Since the number of attempts to add the section have risen over the last few days, it's probably worth having a formal discussion. - 1742: 1832: 1772: 1408: 378: 1757: 925: 911: 607: 1767: 1655:. They account for many more accidents and incidents than larger civil aircraft. Military aircraft accidents may be suitable for inclusion in the relevant 497: 1528: 1762: 1065: 79: 1659:. For accidents involving light aircraft (maximum gross weight of 12,500 lb (5,670 kg) or less) or any military aircraft the standard for inclusion is: 1842: 1737: 1360:
for subtypes and variants. Sure, they're newer, but being classified as 4.5th generation fighters does not mean that they need their own article. -
168: 1747: 135: 1837: 1827: 573: 531: 1792: 1727: 1105: 582: 271: 259: 85: 24: 1633:
Fnlayson is correct. If it's not a combat loss, then it usually goes in the "Accidents and incidents" section if it is noteworthy. Per
1557:
Also If more that 4604 was produced and 2145 F-16s operational, then what happened with more than 2400 of F-16 that is not operational?
1462: 1193: 315: 129: 1822: 1817: 1787: 310: 1338:
F-16V Block 70/72 Vipers are 4.5 gen fighters. There should be a different page on that. E/F versions can be also transferred there.
886: 125: 1562: 457: 439: 267: 1732: 1722: 453: 449: 445: 306: 300: 254: 99: 30: 1046: 868: 825: 820: 263: 175: 104: 20: 74: 506: 65: 873:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of 214: 185: 141: 288: 1573: 1558: 225: 874: 275: 1466: 1680: 577:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 109: 305:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the 770: 512: 1701: 1628: 1613: 1588: 1566: 1548: 1521: 1500: 1470: 1446: 1420: 1391: 1376: 1347: 1327: 1304: 1288: 1255: 1206: 428: 330: 270:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 1416: 1387: 1383: 1353: 1343: 1339: 1323: 1101: 1036: 483: 1315: 161: 55: 1634: 1624: 1609: 1300: 230: 229: 70: 1584: 1202: 1159: 51: 227: 754: 1517: 1412: 1404: 1357: 1319: 1269: 880: 861: 1411:
for the F-16 that has seen extensive work and puts all the variants detail in one place.
1692: 1539: 1491: 1437: 1427: 1367: 1279: 1246: 1146: 1716: 1650: 1620: 1605: 1481: 1477: 1296: 1192:
The references listed beside the "F-16V Block 70/72" didn't even use that term. The
1580: 1476:
Why would Chinese and Taiwanese sources be excluded? Taiwan News is not listed in
1265: 1198: 845: 814: 786: 831: 1261: 1187: 1056: 738: 1513: 1223: 851: 1686: 1533: 1485: 1431: 1397: 1361: 1311: 1273: 1240: 1165:
Shorten wording where main articles exist. Shorten/summarize long sections.
433: 722: 1683:(or the equivalent to an AD in the case of non-certified aircraft). 565: 525: 1430:
article, made them prime candidates for their own articles. -
1087: 477: 241: 231: 15: 1783:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
1055: 1035: 910: 785: 769: 753: 737: 721: 606: 309:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be 1657:
List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft
1778:
C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
1457:
About taiwan "invested" in the development of the F-16V
1129: 1123: 1117: 1111: 997: 409: 390: 371: 352: 160: 432:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
619:
This article has been checked against the following
319:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
1803:
North American military history task force articles
922: 747:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
704: 618: 1813:United States military history task force articles 923:This article has not yet been checked against the 1798:C-Class North American military history articles 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1808:C-Class United States military history articles 1753:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Technology 1023:assessing the article against each criterion. 174: 8: 1224:https://www.dsca.mil/search/node?keys=F-16V 1154:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 1019:| b5<!--Supporting materials    --: --> 1015:| b4<!--Grammar and style       --: --> 1011:| b3<!--Structure               --: --> 1007:| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --: --> 1003:| b1<!--Referencing and citation--: --> 919: 809: 779:North American military history task force 701: 615: 520: 324: 283: 795:United States military history task force 1599:Where would the Ukrainian F-16 loss fit? 1000:the following code to the template call: 867:This article is within the scope of the 571:This article is within the scope of the 1216: 811: 522: 481: 1743:Knowledge vital articles in Technology 1678: 1673: 1640: 885:. To use this banner, please see the 591:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 581:. To use this banner, please see the 1833:Old requests for aviation peer review 1773:Military aviation task force articles 1106:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 594:Template:WikiProject Military history 295:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 272:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 260:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 25:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 7: 1758:C-Class vital articles in Technology 1403:However, even if this happens, per 1194:Defense Security Cooperation Agency 996:To fill out this checklist, please 23:for discussing improvements to the 1768:C-Class military aviation articles 14: 1763:C-Class military history articles 1843:Knowledge pages with to-do lists 1738:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 1145: 1095: 982: 971: 960: 949: 938: 854: 844: 830: 813: 678: 667: 656: 645: 634: 564: 524: 491: 482: 427: 329: 287: 245: 213: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1748:C-Class level-5 vital articles 895:Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation 511:It is of interest to multiple 1: 1838:WikiProject Aviation articles 1828:WikiProject Aircraft articles 1447:18:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 1421:18:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 1392:18:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 1377:15:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 1348:07:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 1044:This article is supported by 898:Template:WikiProject Aviation 258:for general discussion about 42:Put new text under old text. 1793:Weaponry task force articles 1728:Old requests for peer review 1549:02:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 1522:00:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 1501:04:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 1471:03:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 1356:I'm not sure that they meet 1328:03:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 731:Military aviation task force 574:Military history WikiProject 1702:23:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 1629:21:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 1614:21:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 1527:Lockheed Martin themselves 1305:16:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC) 1289:05:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC) 1256:05:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1859: 1207:06:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC) 943:Referencing and citation: 639:Referencing and citation: 360:Featured article candidate 313:. Editors may also seek a 1823:C-Class aircraft articles 1818:C-Class aviation articles 1788:C-Class weaponry articles 1063: 1043: 839: 793: 777: 761: 745: 729: 700: 597:military history articles 559: 519: 464: 426: 417:Good article reassessment 327: 323: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1589:13:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC) 1567:12:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC) 1681:Airworthiness Directive 1064:This article has had a 954:Coverage and accuracy: 705:Associated task forces: 650:Coverage and accuracy: 1733:C-Class vital articles 1723:Delisted good articles 1574:Slavic Positron Cannon 1559:Slavic Positron Cannon 1060: 1040: 987:Supporting materials: 915: 790: 774: 758: 742: 726: 683:Supporting materials: 611: 75:avoid personal attacks 1059: 1039: 914: 789: 773: 757: 741: 725: 610: 498:level-5 vital article 467:Delisted good article 307:good article criteria 301:Warfare good articles 207:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 1641:Accidents involving 1047:the aircraft project 870:Aviation WikiProject 379:Good article nominee 262:. Any such comments 105:No original research 976:Grammar and style: 929:for B-class status: 763:Weaponry task force 672:Grammar and style: 625:for B-class status: 1135:Updated 2011-06-04 1061: 1041: 916: 791: 775: 759: 743: 727: 612: 579:list of open tasks 507:content assessment 335:Article milestones 257: 86:dispute resolution 47: 1647:military aircraft 1178: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1030: 1029: 1020:= <yes/no: --> 1016:= <yes/no: --> 1012:= <yes/no: --> 1008:= <yes/no: --> 1004:= <yes/no: --> 901:aviation articles 887:full instructions 808: 807: 804: 803: 800: 799: 696: 695: 641:criterion not met 583:full instructions 476: 475: 472: 471: 282: 281: 253: 238: 237: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1850: 1700: 1695: 1689: 1577: 1547: 1542: 1536: 1507:Quantity of F-16 1499: 1494: 1488: 1445: 1440: 1434: 1409:Variants article 1375: 1370: 1364: 1287: 1282: 1276: 1254: 1249: 1243: 1234:Future operators 1226: 1221: 1191: 1149: 1142: 1141: 1136: 1099: 1098: 1088: 1024: 990: 986: 985: 979: 975: 974: 968: 964: 963: 957: 953: 952: 946: 942: 941: 920: 903: 902: 899: 896: 893: 864: 859: 858: 857: 848: 841: 840: 835: 834: 833: 828: 817: 810: 712: 702: 686: 682: 681: 675: 671: 670: 664: 660: 659: 653: 649: 648: 642: 638: 637: 616: 599: 598: 595: 592: 589: 588:Military history 568: 561: 560: 555: 532:Military history 528: 521: 504: 495: 494: 487: 486: 478: 465:Current status: 458:February 2, 2024 454:February 2, 2019 450:February 2, 2016 446:February 2, 2012 431: 412: 393: 374: 355: 353:January 28, 2006 334: 333: 325: 291: 284: 249: 248: 242: 232: 218: 217: 208: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1713: 1712: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1687: 1601: 1571: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1534: 1509: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1486: 1459: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1432: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1362: 1336: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1274: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1222: 1218: 1185: 1183: 1174: 1173: 1168: 1110: 1096: 995: 988: 983: 977: 972: 966: 961: 955: 950: 944: 939: 900: 897: 894: 891: 890: 862:Aviation portal 860: 855: 853: 829: 823: 710: 684: 679: 673: 668: 662: 657: 651: 646: 640: 635: 596: 593: 590: 587: 586: 534: 505:on Knowledge's 502: 492: 408: 389: 370: 351: 328: 297:was one of the 246: 234: 233: 228: 205: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1856: 1854: 1846: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1725: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1691: 1676: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1643:light aircraft 1638: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1555: 1538: 1508: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1490: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1436: 1428:Mikoyan MiG-29 1423: 1401: 1366: 1335: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1314:I concur with 1308: 1307: 1278: 1245: 1235: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1167: 1166: 1153: 1151: 1150: 1138: 1093: 1091: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1062: 1052: 1051: 1042: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 993: 992: 991: 980: 969: 958: 947: 933: 932: 930: 917: 907: 906: 904: 866: 865: 849: 837: 836: 818: 806: 805: 802: 801: 798: 797: 792: 782: 781: 776: 766: 765: 760: 750: 749: 744: 734: 733: 728: 718: 717: 715: 713: 707: 706: 698: 697: 694: 693: 691: 689: 688: 687: 676: 665: 654: 643: 629: 628: 626: 613: 603: 602: 600: 569: 557: 556: 529: 517: 516: 510: 488: 474: 473: 470: 469: 462: 461: 440:On this day... 424: 423: 420: 413: 410:March 21, 2023 405: 404: 401: 394: 391:April 24, 2011 386: 385: 382: 375: 367: 366: 363: 356: 348: 347: 344: 341: 337: 336: 321: 320: 292: 280: 279: 276:Reference desk 264:may be removed 250: 236: 235: 226: 224: 223: 220: 219: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1855: 1844: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1756: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1741: 1739: 1736: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1721: 1720: 1718: 1703: 1696: 1690: 1684: 1682: 1677: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1660: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1652:non-prominent 1648: 1644: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1598: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1575: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1543: 1537: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1506: 1502: 1495: 1489: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463:14.199.160.12 1456: 1448: 1441: 1435: 1429: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1396:I agree with 1395: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1371: 1365: 1359: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1283: 1277: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1250: 1244: 1233: 1225: 1220: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1195: 1189: 1180: 1164: 1162: 1161: 1156: 1155: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1109: 1107: 1103: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1038: 1034: 1033: 1026: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 999: 994: 981: 970: 959: 948: 937: 936: 935: 934: 931: 928: 927: 921: 918: 913: 909: 908: 905: 888: 884: 883: 878: 877: 872: 871: 863: 852: 850: 847: 843: 842: 838: 827: 822: 819: 816: 812: 796: 788: 784: 783: 780: 772: 768: 767: 764: 756: 752: 751: 748: 740: 736: 735: 732: 724: 720: 719: 716: 714: 709: 708: 703: 699: 692: 690: 685:criterion met 677: 674:criterion met 666: 663:criterion met 655: 652:criterion met 644: 633: 632: 631: 630: 627: 624: 623: 617: 614: 609: 605: 604: 601: 584: 580: 576: 575: 570: 567: 563: 562: 558: 554: 553:United States 550: 549:North America 546: 542: 538: 533: 530: 527: 523: 518: 514: 508: 500: 499: 489: 485: 480: 479: 468: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 441: 435: 430: 425: 421: 419: 418: 414: 411: 407: 406: 402: 400: 399: 395: 392: 388: 387: 383: 381: 380: 376: 373: 372:April 7, 2011 369: 368: 364: 362: 361: 357: 354: 350: 349: 345: 342: 339: 338: 332: 326: 322: 318: 317: 312: 308: 304: 303: 302: 296: 293: 290: 286: 285: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 256: 252:This page is 251: 244: 243: 240: 222: 221: 216: 212: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1651: 1646: 1642: 1602: 1510: 1460: 1337: 1259: 1237: 1219: 1211: 1184: 1158: 1157: 1139: 1132: 1126: 1120: 1114: 1100: 1094: 1071:now archived 1069: 1045: 924: 881: 875: 869: 620: 572: 513:WikiProjects 496: 466: 437: 415: 396: 377: 365:Not promoted 358: 316:reassessment 314: 299: 298: 294: 239: 210: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1649:are mostly 1635:WP:AIRCRASH 1334:New Article 1066:peer review 989:not checked 978:not checked 967:not checked 965:Structure: 956:not checked 945:not checked 882:task forces 661:Structure: 398:Peer review 311:renominated 255:not a forum 148:free images 31:not a forum 1717:Categories 1413:TROPtastic 1384:Shahed0078 1354:Shahed0078 1340:Shahed0078 1320:The Legacy 1270:The Legacy 1212:References 1102:To-do list 876:open tasks 541:Technology 444:column on 268:refactored 1621:-Fnlayson 1297:-Fnlayson 1068:which is 501:is rated 434:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1606:Sterge08 1554:instead. 1405:WP:AIR/N 1358:WP:AIR/N 1316:Fylayson 1260:Pinging 926:criteria 892:Aviation 826:Aircraft 821:Aviation 622:criteria 545:Weaponry 537:Aviation 422:Delisted 403:Reviewed 211:365 days 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1581:Pbritti 1266:Poklane 1199:RPC7778 1160:Cleanup 1130:refresh 1118:history 503:C-class 436:in the 343:Process 274:at the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1529:stated 1482:WP:RSN 1478:WP:RSP 1268:, and 1262:BilCat 1188:BilCat 509:scale. 456:, and 384:Listed 346:Result 126:Google 1514:Wfoj3 1181:F-16V 1124:watch 490:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1688:ZLEA 1645:and 1625:talk 1610:talk 1585:talk 1563:talk 1535:ZLEA 1518:talk 1487:ZLEA 1484:. - 1467:talk 1433:ZLEA 1417:talk 1398:ZLEA 1388:talk 1363:ZLEA 1344:talk 1324:talk 1312:ZLEA 1301:talk 1275:ZLEA 1272:. - 1242:ZLEA 1203:talk 1112:edit 1104:for 879:and 340:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 998:add 266:or 176:TWL 1719:: 1685:- 1627:) 1612:) 1587:) 1565:) 1520:) 1469:) 1419:) 1390:) 1346:) 1326:) 1318:. 1303:) 1264:, 1205:) 824:: 711:/ 551:/ 547:/ 543:/ 539:/ 535:: 452:, 448:, 209:: 201:, 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 1699:\ 1694:T 1637:: 1623:( 1608:( 1583:( 1576:: 1572:@ 1561:( 1546:\ 1541:T 1516:( 1498:\ 1493:T 1465:( 1444:\ 1439:T 1415:( 1386:( 1374:\ 1369:T 1342:( 1322:( 1299:( 1286:\ 1281:T 1253:\ 1248:T 1201:( 1190:: 1186:@ 1163:: 1133:· 1127:· 1121:· 1115:· 1108:: 1074:. 1050:. 889:. 585:. 515:. 460:. 442:" 438:" 278:. 203:4 199:3 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2
3
4

not a forum

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.