Talk:Genetically modified organism

1126:

crops (Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants, National Research Council and Division on Earth and Life Studies 2002). Both the U.S. National Research Council and the Joint Research Centre (the European Union's scientific and technical research laboratory and an integral part of the European Commission) have concluded that there is a comprehensive body of knowledge that adequately addresses the food safety issue of genetically engineered crops (Committee on Identifying and Assessing Unintended Effects of Genetically Engineered Foods on Human Health and National Research Council 2004; European Commission Joint Research Centre 2008). These and other recent reports conclude that the processes of genetic engineering and conventional breeding are no different in terms of unintended consequences to human health and the environment (European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2010).

4096:

feel unreasonable. But if you are planning to get the article to FAC at some point, I have the feeling that the "Controversy" section is the weakest part of the article, and should ideally be improved before submitting to FAC. My suggestion above was one, probably ill-conceived, attempt to get the section into the right direction. This controversy is for sure of high relevance (maybe not so much for science, but for society in general), and in my opinion could be fleshed out without violating Summary style. I'm really not sure what to do precisely. It somehow remains very general and vague, without really getting to the points. A clear structure is also difficult to spot (most of the section is about food, with some bits in-between about other concerns). Maybe try to discuss concerns point by point. One more point that you may want to consider:

499: 1075:

of the World Health Organization (WHO, 2002). These foods have been assessed for increased risks to human health by several national regulatory authorities (inter alia, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, the United Kingdom and the United States) using their national food safety procedures (ICSU). To date no verifiable untoward toxic or nutritionally deleterious effects resulting from the consumption of foods derived from genetically modified crops have been discovered anywhere in the world (GM Science Review Panel). Many millions of people have consumed foods derived from GM plants - mainly maize, soybean and oilseed rape - without any observed adverse effects (ICSU).

4204:

even be attempting this. A single paragraph could work, but it would need that one to be changed slightly. I think allergenicity needs to be mentioned as a concern, along with HGT to humans (although less so). Pusztai and Seralini could be something else that is linked (I think we did it well somewhere else). Obviously they need to be balanced with how much of a risk there actually is. I am of the opinion that not mentioning something due to unscientific concerns just makes the problem worse. Better to mention it and then explain the science. It does get a bit tricky for overview articles, but we all knew this was going to be a difficult section to get right.

4200:

concerns to the crop section, but the same could be said about the health paragraph (fish aside) and no one is going to touch that. Crops is mentioned as the major concern in the lead and intro of this section, so I don't think there are Due concerns giving it extra weight. I might include a sentence on containment of research GMOs somewhere to broaden the scope a bit if I can find a decent source. I actually misread your use of that parity source and see now it was for the preceding sentence. I still feel we need a stronger source to say that rates of weeds have not increased. I would be surprised if there was not a journal article on this.

2061:, or permission from ArbCom. The GMO ArbCom case was such a bloodletting that this is the way that things are, and why I'm so sensitive about it. But to repeat: I realize everyone here was acting in good faith. I know there is an edit notice every time anyone edits the page, that points to the DS and refers to page-specific restrictions, which in this case means looking at the talk page to see the information about the RfC. I think transcluding a new template might require prior permission from ArbCom. I'm just explaining that; I didn't make the rules. I like what you did with the non-displaying notice. Thanks. -- 1173:

GM products (mainly maize and soybeans) are as safe and nutritious as the respective conventional non-GM plant, and those raising still serious concerns, was observed. Moreover, it is worth mentioning that most of the studies demonstrating that GM foods are as nutritional and safe as those obtained by conventional breeding, have been performed by biotechnology companies or associates, which are also responsible of commercializing these GM plants. Anyhow, this represents a notable advance in comparison with the lack of studies published in recent years in scientific journals by those companies.

4158:

weight. I think it is important for the narrative that we outline what the concerns are before we dispel them. That is followed by the environment, which although it gets less mentioning in the media has more evidence in the reliable literature. My general thinking weight wise is two paragraphs on health (one covered by the arb wording), two on environment (one focusing on gene flow - which is probably the most significant), one paragraph covering the other issues (IP, religous etc) and one paragraph giving us an intro to the opposition (including the groups involved).

1328:

research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than e.g. conventional plant breeding technologies.' The World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the British Royal Society, and every other respected organization that has examined the evidence has come to the same conclusion: consuming foods containing ingredients derived from GM crops is no riskier than consuming the same foods containing ingredients from crop plants modified by conventional plant improvement techniques.

4251:

overstated by many so not sure we need to give it more than a passing mention. Of the two studies often cited one is misunderstood and the other would be interpreted as background by most researchers. I added the older source you mentioned, if a newer one comes up we can replace it. I think we cover gene flow to other similar (or wild-type) species adequately now, but feel free to make some adjustments. Overall I am pretty happy with our coverage of crops, although I might look for some non-food controversies.

419: 384: 2292:

needed. When I was writing this I was adding information as I found it and some is probably more important than others. I tried to keep it to themes and emphasised the research side more as it tends to get overlooked here and I didn't want this to become just another GM crop article. Also what I found interesting might not be great encyclopaedically. I have some ideas of what could be trimmed or maybe even combined, but will not prejudge you. Thanks for the help and thoughts, you too Trypto.

351: 693: 566: 908: 672: 545: 4121:

if this would be nominated for FA, but until it would be prepped for FA-like depth, I'd really only expect the gene flow topic to have a sentence or two at most on gene flow (currently mentioned in the controversy section) and more in the daughter articles. A bit more history on the controversy section is that it is meant to be vague as it gives brief mention of largely fringe viewpoints without going into depth or undue weight of those viewpoints while leaving more for

4129:

health risk for farmers, with one farmers generally don't have to interact with that also doesn't affect human health. The latter for herbicides currently uses a much less toxic herbicide that still gets sprayed like any other pesticide, but that's replacing older more toxic herbicides. Your comments are reminding me of a few areas here that could be strengthened, so I'll see if I can do some tweaks in this area in the next day or two to tackle some vague wording.

576: 475: 4102:– "beneficial" is quite vague here. Using GM crops is arguably not beneficial for the farmer's health, as GM crops come in a package with pesticides. On the other hand, few would disagree that GM crops would be beneficial to the farmers as they increase yield. So why mention the farmers at all in the introductory paragraph? In my feeling the whole discussion revolves more around environmental impact and consumers health. -- 21: 523: 342: 1926: 703: 798: 3987:

wise, but may in the future provide some content suitable for here. We don't mention the ethics or regulation of human genetic engineering, because until now (well really Lulu and Nana still need better confirmation) it has always been the realm of sci fi. I also find this whole regulatory issues very dry and don't really want to add too much on regulatory agencies and legislation to this page (

405: 777: 4562: 269: 299: 2514: 2240:). I am pretty happy with where we sit personally so if there are no other major concerns I will take a little break from it and then do a final copy-edit. I do not enjoy the busy-work of consistently formatting refs and am happy as long as the information is easy for readers to find. That is one of the reasons why I focus on GAs and not FAs. For those unfamiliar these are the 870: 2204:

another paragraph. While you are at it, you might want to check whether, in fact, there are some duplicate citations. I think there might be, for AAAS and AMA, but I didn't check carefully. They look different because of the within-cite quotations. But it would be fine to leave the RfC cites as is, and use their "ref name="s to cite them again in other paragraphs. --

2015:. I've been correcting these things, but I should not have to do so, and I certainly do not want the problem to get worse in the course of a GA review. After the most recent round of edits (I assume the ones by you, Aircorn), there is now a citation error within that paragraph, that needs to be fixed promptly. Apparently, some new content in the page uses 3969:, but may struggle to find info on research. As to the US bias, they are the major pusher of the technology (in crops anyway) so it is mainly focused on them. I tried to keep the regulation as a contrast between Europe and the USA as they are probably the most conflicting in terms of regulations. If that isn't apparent then I will look at rewording it. 2902:. Release to market got stalled in labeling law. Instead, first actual sales were in Canada, August 2017. I added refs to confirm both. Raised in Panama does not mean sold in Panama. And anyway, AquaBounty changed its mind and intends to produce fish for US in Indiana. For the moment, not allowed to move eggs from the egg facility in Canada, to US. 4747:"Monsanto and Bayer have become one of the largest companies that control the seed and pesticide market in both the united states and Europe now that their deal is complete. These are one of the major players in the GMO world that drive new innovative ways to have new GMOs this also includes Pesticides and herbicides that are used in crops." 2011:– this requirement still applies. This is a serious matter, subject to Discretionary Sanctions. There is no problem with a formatting change that is not visible, but recently there have repeatedly been changes that modify the within-citation direct quotes, changing line breaks or the positions of quote marks, and that is 1973:. This one focusing more on the products, while the other more on the process. There was always going to be some overlap unfortunately, but hopefully it is not too bad. This has gotten quite long though, with 54kb readable prose, so there may be a case for trimming. I have copied information from here to recreated 4120:

No worries, I'm just feeling out what you were looking for along with some of the logistics of handling some of these topics in various depths. I'm mostly just trying to help wade through of the reasoning and history for the layout of this article and how it fits with the other articles. I'm not sure

2702:

scientific literature after it caught on in popular culture despite the initial preference and precision issues. I've changed the text a bit and moved it behind the sentence talking about precision in terminology to make this a bit more clear. Let me know if something still isn't clear on that front.

2178:

I am more interested in the order of the paragraphs in that section. I can understand wanting to keep it as a separate paragraph, but I would like to at least move the health introductory sentence above it. I think it would be good to keep the environmental concerns next followed by the miscellaneous

1535:

GM foods currently available on the international market have passed safety assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health. In addition, no effects on human health have been shown as a result of the consumption of such foods by the general population in the countries where they have

1297:

Despite various concerns, today, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the World Health Organization, and many independent international science organizations agree that GMOs are just as safe as other foods. Compared with conventional breeding techniques, genetic engineering is far

1246:

The presented articles suggesting possible harm of GMOs received high public attention. However, despite their claims, they actually weaken the evidence for the harm and lack of substantial equivalency of studied GMOs. We emphasize that with over 1783 published articles on GMOs over the last 10 years

1074:

Currently available transgenic crops and foods derived from them have been judged safe to eat and the methods used to test their safety have been deemed appropriate. These conclusions represent the consensus of the scientific evidence surveyed by the ICSU (2003) and they are consistent with the views

987:

that currently available food derived from GM crops poses no greater risk to human health than conventional food, but that each GM food needs to be tested on a case-by-case basis before introduction. Nonetheless, members of the public are much less likely than scientists to perceive GM foods as safe.

4184:

when mentioned, but it's also not something I'd fuss over any more for the GA at least. I agree with you that I'd rather see the controversy stuff integrated into the article and remove the section (and maybe get rid of some headaches trying to work with that material), but that's probably something

4179:

For a bit more clarification, the introductory sentence removal was meant to cut down on redundancy since the health stuff was more or less covered by the arb language, but it was just my stab at trimming if it worked. I also added the Kniss source in terms of parity because the Gilbert source isn't

4076:

This sort of stuff has basically been set aside in the last paragraph of this article (and other articles) including some environmental things to "describe the controversy". I guess I'm not sure how much more could really be included at this broad overview article yet without first fleshing out more

3430:

I think I have either fixed all the raised issues or responded here. Sorry it took a bit longer than I expected. I really appreciate the review and look forward to the second half. I should warn you that my hands will be a bit tied when it comes to the controversy section (ARB enforced wording needs

2309:

Thanks, I'm glad that we are good on it. I'm going to mostly leave the GA to you and KofA and whoever else wants to do it, because my bandwidth for it is already a bit full: I'm helping get another page to FA, and the whole GM area has gotten to feel like "work" for me. So good luck, and let me know

2100:

The way I see it, anything that changes the meaning requires that kind of permission. That would certainly include adding a more recent citation, because that would be tantamount to updating what the RfC decided. For minor modifications such as formatting, I think it's important to keep in mind that

1477:

Several scientific organizations in the US have issued studies or statements regarding the safety of GMOs indicating that there is no evidence that GMOs present unique safety risks compared to conventionally bred products. These include the National Research Council, the American Association for the

1172:

In spite of this, the number of studies specifically focused on safety assessment of GM plants is still limited. However, it is important to remark that for the first time, a certain equilibrium in the number of research groups suggesting, on the basis of their studies, that a number of varieties of

1047:

The literature about Biodiversity and the GE food/feed consumption has sometimes resulted in animated debate regarding the suitability of the experimental designs, the choice of the statistical methods or the public accessibility of data. Such debate, even if positive and part of the natural process

4203:

As to the health info, my main problem is the constraints placed upon us by the GMORFC. It makes writing a flowing article a bit difficult (i.e. the regulatory sentence would fit in better above and there is no real lead in). In the end it is doable, and if we hadn't got closure on that I would not

2276:

I saw the updates just as I was getting away from the computer for awhile. I haven't had a chance to really dig into them all for potential trimming, etc., but overall they look like pretty good additions. I've been meaning to do a read through of the whole article sometime soon after the New Year,

2101:

each one of the quotations within the citations was fought over scorched earth. When someone makes a relatively trivial revision (maybe that's where the ref name=AMA came from), I take into consideration whether it was good faith. And again, all of what happened this time was entirely good faith. --

1622:

Members of the GM jury project were briefed on various aspects of genetic modification by a diverse group of acknowledged experts in the relevant subjects. The GM jury reached the conclusion that the sale of GM foods currently available should be halted and the moratorium on commercial growth of GM

1243:

Here, we show that a number of articles some of which have strongly and negatively influenced the public opinion on GM crops and even provoked political actions, such as GMO embargo, share common flaws in the statistical evaluation of the data. Having accounted for these flaws, we conclude that the

4292:

The controversy sections are the biggest headache in all these articles. They take up most of the talk page discussions and have burnt out (sometimes unwillingly) many editors. I agree it is the weakest section here, and it is likely to remain so no matter what we do as there are so many different

4235:

that basically say HGT is not a significant risk to human or environmental health either. I’d still have to think about how to tackle this one too (maybe next week when I’m not on mobile). I don’t see this as something that would necessarily hinder the GA process and could be dealt with at a later

2324:

The recent addition of the Etylmology section looks pretty good. It's more comprehensive than the draft I had partially put together. I still have a few sources I have to dig through that I could add, and I'll take care of wrapping that and the overall read-through I mentioned tomorrow and Monday.

2022:

I realize that these are good-faith errors, so I have no intention of going after anyone, but please stop introducing these problems. There is a very simple way to avoid any problems at all: do not alter the paragraph, even if it is simply a matter of "consistent formatting". A bit of inconsistent

1626:

The Royal Society review (2002) concluded that the risks to human health associated with the use of specific viral DNA sequences in GM plants are negligible, and while calling for caution in the introduction of potential allergens into food crops, stressed the absence of evidence that commercially

1327:

The EU, for example, has invested more than €300 million in research on the biosafety of GMOs. Its recent report states: 'The main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research and involving more than 500 independent

4767:

I have removed the addition. The generalizations are not in line with how sourced statements typically appear on wikipedia, and overall language is vague, "new innovative ways to have new GMOs" particularly so. I see that you are a student editor, and I suggest that you choose a different area of

4199:

Sorry it took a while to get down to here. While many of the agricultural issues are common to all farming (monocultures, pesticide use, etc), they are brought up a lot with regards to this technology. Maybe that paragraph needs to state that somewhere. I would love to move many of these specific

4095:

Please consider all my points as mere suggestions for further improvement. Not everything is required for reaching GA, including this point. My personal goal is not to pass it as GA as fast as possible, but to help improving the article as much as possible. Please feel free to skip everything you

2078:

Whether that applies to small edits and modifications could be debated. There was talk of updating the Domingo reference some time ago. Suffice it to say that any change will need some sort of strong consensus. It was a necessary evil at the time and has done its job remarkably well. Personally I

1293:

Overall, a broad scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food... Major national and international science and medical associations have stated that no adverse human health effects related to GMO food have been reported or substantiated in

1125:

There is broad scientific consensus that genetically engineered crops currently on the market are safe to eat. After 14 years of cultivation and a cumulative total of 2 billion acres planted, no adverse health or environmental effects have resulted from commercialization of genetically engineered

3986:

I am in two minds about this. I understand the world view concern, but the fact is most sources focuses on the US vs EU conflict. Also as far as I can tell most other countries seem to base their regulations from those ones. The He controversy is still too new to really get a gauge on regulation

3675:

Yeah, I personally don't usually find it a big deal which one is used even if it's inconsistent (I didn't notice at all in my previous reviews), but I also saw a fair mix of both uses now that I look. You never know if someone might raise a fuss in the future on RETAIN though, so it'll save some

2378:

Aircorn, I just did my once over, and most anything I could think of wasn't really needed for fleshing out at this article in terms of GA assessment here afterall. Most things I initially had in mind as potential issues keep an eye out for are better addressed at the crops article and are either

2203:

About the paragraph order, I'm fine with the reordering you suggest, thanks for asking. But please do not restore it by self-reverting. Please make a clean edit, because your first edit reverted what Boghog did. I just don't want the RfC paragraph to be too low, and I don't want it combined into

4250:

I suppose it depends how deep down the rabbit hole we go. There is the Brazilian nut and the pea which were self regulated to a degree. Plus you have the option of potentially removing allergens through GE. I added a source saying they are tested for toxicity and allerginicity. HGT to humans is

4175:

No worries. The secondary pest thing isn't really unique to GMOs per se (open a niche with resistant plants or other control methods, GM or not, and something can still fill it) and probably fits better under the crop section, but I'm ok with your current version as is in terms of the GA nom at

4157:

I undid one of your edits as I think it is important to mention the secondary pest concern. I will expand on it when I get time. I am not sure about removing the health introductory sentence either. From my understanding health is the major concern anti-GM groups focus on so deserves a bit more

4128:

For the sentence you mentioned, beneficial includes different aspects like financial, health, etc. in the cited sources. The health one is a big factor because the GM crops either have plant-produced insecticides or herbicide tolerance. The former replaces foliar insecticides, which are often a

3031:

This was just part of an introductory sentence into bacteria used in agriculture. It is application of the whole bacteria in a spray usually used by organic farmers. It is quite popular, or at least was. I think there are issues with the sun degrading it and rain washing it off, so not sure how

2701:

This one was my doing, so I'll address it. Basically, GMO has not been a preferred term by scientists compared to genetically engineered organism as outlined in the rest of the paragraph, and GMO really wasn't used at the time. The sources are basically describing that GMO became more common in

1654:

The largest differences between the public and the AAAS scientists are found in beliefs about the safety of eating genetically modified (GM) foods. Nearly nine-in-ten (88%) scientists say it is generally safe to eat GM foods compared with 37% of the general public, a difference of 51 percentage

1618:

When seeking to optimise the balance between benefits and risks, it is prudent to err on the side of caution and, above all, learn from accumulating knowledge and experience. Any new technology such as genetic modification must be examined for possible benefits and risks to human health and the

1044:

We have reviewed the scientific literature on GE crop safety for the last 10 years that catches the scientific consensus matured since GE plants became widely cultivated worldwide, and we can conclude that the scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazard directly

4228: 2291:

It is briefly mentioned (two sentences) under regulation regarding the different take US has compared to EU. There is also the older meanings of GMO re traditional breeding that may need to be given context and still comes up at these pages every now and again, so maybe an Etymology section is

3897:

As to whether some countries are more advanced than others, I have not really found anything useful to add here. Common sense would say that countries with less scientific funding in general would be behind, but that is not A GM thing in particular. The regulations for research appear pretty

1506:

On the basis of detailed examination of comparisons of currently commercialized GE with non-GE foods in compositional analysis, acute and chronic animal toxicity tests, long-term data on health of livestock fed GE foods, and human epidemiological data, the committee found no differences that

1411:

A report issued by the scientific council of the American Medical Association (AMA) says that no long-term health effects have been detected from the use of transgenic crops and genetically modified foods, and that these foods are substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts.

1478:

Advancement of Science, and the American Medical Association. Groups in the US opposed to GMOs include some environmental organizations, organic farming organizations, and consumer organizations. A substantial number of legal academics have criticized the US's approach to regulating GMOs.

4046:

You state that there is no scientific evidence for negative impact on human health. But to be fair, there is evidence for other (e.g., environmental) concerns, such as gene flow. I think this evidence, especially regarding gene flow to other species, should be mentioned, with examples.

4226:

fashion by mentioning that allergens are screened for as part of the regulatory process (i.e., adding a peanut allergen protein isn't going to get approved). For HGT, I’m still looking for good sources we can use here (I usually deal with the primary literature on this subject), but

3158:

The original source was quite broad so found an example for tuberculosis (which is possibly the most important one). Don't really want to go into too much detail here as I am trying to keep it overviewish. It went to phase II trials, but although safe wasn't as effective as hoped.

2277:

so I'll see what I can do to help before a GA review. The one that might get a little dicey, but needs to be addressed before GA is the definition of GMO especially in relation to gene editing, but also how it was a nebulous term scientifically before gene editing really came up.

1615:

In our view, the potential for GM foods to cause harmful health effects is very small and many of the concerns expressed apply with equal vigour to conventionally derived foods. However, safety concerns cannot, as yet, be dismissed completely on the basis of information currently

3960:

Article is strongly focused on the US, but almost nothing on China, despite it being a major player in research. I wonder what the regulations are in China? Apparently labeling is mandatory, but research seems not to be as strongly regulated considering the resent human babies?

2182:(not sure why the spaces were removed, might be a bug in visual editor). I fully understand the importance of the consensus paragraph, I would not be editing this article if we hadn't got that resolution, and have been careful not to change it or edit against the spirit of it. 1627:

available GM foods cause clinical allergic manifestations. The BMA shares the view that that there is no robust evidence to prove that GM foods are unsafe but we endorse the call for further research and surveillance to provide convincing evidence of safety and benefit.

2042:

one. It might be better to move this text into a template and transclude the template back into this article (and any other articles that contain this text). Just out of curiosity, and changes to this text (e.g., adding more recent sources) would require a new RFC?

3877:

Okay found a few decent papers (-crops and -food in the search engine helped). Added quite a bit to the regulation article and a trimmed down version here. Hopefully this covers enough. Luckily the laboratory regulations are pretty consistent across all countries.

3032:

effective it is. The genes taken from this bacterium form a large part of the GM crop section. I kept most of the info tied to that section. If it is less confusing I can move it down there, or just delete it as I am not talking about them as specific GMOs here.

2179:

ones. Basically from my understanding health is the main concern (hence the RFC), followed by the environment. It currently doesn't flow well going intro - scientific consensus on health - miscellaneous - health - environment. This is a diff of what I propose

2261:

Thanks. Given that the issue I raised became sort-of off-topic for the GA effort, please feel free, if you would like to, to collapse the discussion starting at my first comment and continuing through the first paragraph of your most recent comment here.

1623:

crops should be continued. These conclusions were based on the precautionary principle and lack of evidence of any benefit. The Jury expressed concern over the impact of GM crops on farming, the environment, food safety and other potential health effects.

4308:

Personally I am not interested in getting these articles to FA level. I feel the amount of fine-tuning needed is not the most efficient use of my time. I could probably get half a dozen of these articles to GA standard in the time it takes to get one to

3964:

The babies were not approved (for want of a better word) so were done outside of the regulatory system. It does pose questions on their checks and balances though. It may take a while, but I will see what I can dig up. I can add some info on crops from

2199:

As I said, I realize that everybody was acting in good faith, so I'm OK with taking the blame for the cite error. But all I did was restore the cite information that had been there before your edits, and your edits brought in the second "AMA" cite, so,

1532:

Different GM organisms include different genes inserted in different ways. This means that individual GM foods and their safety should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and that it is not possible to make general statements on the safety of all GM

4066:

explains some of that. For your example, the risks of gene flow are basically no different between GMO or traditional breeding in the crop world at least (e.g., it doesn't matter whether herbicide tolerance came from traditional breeding or genetic

2019:, creating a conflict with the RfC paragraph: see the references list. The citation within the RfC paragraph should remain as it is, and the citation somewhere else on the page (I'm not going to look for it) should be revised to something like AMA2. 4180:

peer-reviewed (i.e., written only by a science journalist as opposed to a statement by an actual weed scientist that is usually considered reliable when attributed). There's more to flesh out on the gene flow topic to make sure everything is

3860:. I don't know if this information is just not easily available, is kept in house or is just flooded out by regulations involving the release of GMOs. It has been a little while since I searched for this so will give it another go now. 1420:" "Crops and foods produced using recombinant DNA techniques have been available for fewer than 10 years and no long-term effects have been detected to date. These foods are substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts. 4304:

Yeah I wasn't sure where to put the farmer info as it is often disputed as to whether there is any actual benefit to them from growing GM crops. It does look out of place; I will move it to the crop section where it should fit in

4236:

time, so there doesn’t need to be a rush on this, but there’s also the now is as good as time as any aspect too. I'm getting more drive to really dig into developing this topic again, so I'd be willing to help out in either case.

207: 2037:

OK, fine, but there was absolutely no warning given to editors in the article itself that there is a special paragraph that has been frozen in time. There is a warning on this talk page, but not in the article itself. I have

4297:

for that. If it was completely up to me I would get rid of the controversy section altogether and incorporate it into other sections, but there are probably fair points to keep it in given the feelings and coverage of this

1536:

been approved. Continuous application of safety assessments based on the Codex Alimentarius principles and, where appropriate, adequate post market monitoring, should form the basis for ensuring the safety of GM foods.

1415: 508: 398: 4360:

Went through the cites (there are a lot) and edited some and replaced others. Some could be better, but I feel it meets the Good Standard. If you have any in particulr you are concerned about I can focus on those.

4054:, so I wonder if that would be a better question when that article is under GA review considering how the network of articles/daughter articles is set up? This one gets tricky because a lot of those "concerns" are 1203:

I began this article with the testimonials from respected scientists that there is literally no scientific controversy over the health effects of GMOs. My investigation into the scientific literature tells another

4221:

Part of my removals were just for streamlining with prejudice against fleshing those topics out if they fit better, so that all sounds pretty good. Allergenicity definitely can be pretty easily addressed in a

1930: 1902: 945: 932: 919: 465: 4301:

I feel we cover gene flow well enough, I could potentially explain the Mexican maize example as it is probably the most well known. I should probably do the Monarch Butterflies for the same reason too.

2519: 4878: 1965:

Merry Christmas. As anyone watching this page is well aware I have been doing extensive developments recently. Thanks to those that fixed some of my errors. I am looking to put this through the

1451:

Bioengineered foods have been consumed for close to 20 years, and during that time, no overt consequences on human health have been reported and/or substantiated in the peer-reviewed literature.

4828: 4293:

opinions on the topic of GMO safety and what is due weight. I think it is best to keep this as general as possible and not get too tied down in the arguments and counter arguments. We have

2115:

It may well be that we have made a rod for our own back, but I still think it carries more positives than negatives. FWIW I have added the hidden test to all the articles covered under

1999:

I very much appreciate this work, but there is a problem that concerns me significantly. Editors working on this page need to remember that there is a paragraph that was established at

3654:

is closely related to that. As such my default spelling comes out. So many lame wars have been fought over what in the end is a relatively minor issue that if someone wants to enforce

201: 988:

The legal and regulatory status of GM foods varies by country, with some nations banning or restricting them, and others permitting them with widely differing degrees of regulation.

4843: 459: 3924:

there are currently nine countries that ban the growing and importing GM food. I don't like using that as a source, but have no reason to doubt them. I will look for a better one.

4888: 98: 4928: 4500:

I don't have anything to add at this point. Your changes all look good from what I see. The controversy addition looks good too (notable opinions put in the right place etc.).

3995:

here, but I feel I repeat that section too much already. I am going to leave this for now. Let me know if it is an issue that needs resolving and I will come back to it later.

4768:

focus. If you contact the wikiEdu staff assigned to your class, they can help you switch. GMO-related pages are an area of particular controversy on wikipedia and subject to

3830:

Both seem to read alright to me. I like the first one slightly better as it only has the one of and is slightly shorter. Not too fussed if somoene wants to change it though.

484: 394: 260: 4818: 2552: 848: 3179:

Outside of biology scientists have used a genetically modified virus to construct a more environmentally friendly lithium-ion battery and other nanostructured materials.

1843: 2524: 4923: 4893: 838: 3849:

The regulations section has very little on regulation of research. Do these regulation mean that certain nations are much more advanced in GMO research than others?

2542: 2379:

given just enough of a brief review here or aren't mentioned to avoid getting into the weeds. I'd be pretty comfortable seeing this nominated for GA as it stands.

654: 435: 4833: 4143:

I tried to streamline the controversy section a bit. It's going to be a sort of catchall either way, so if anyone else has ideas, it might be worth trying them.

2080: 355: 2935:

Most food-producing bacteria are lactic acid bacteria, and this is where the majority of research into genetically engineering food-producing bacteria has gone.

2856:

I go into more detail on this under bacteria so hope to just kept it general here. Went with just a strain of Pseudomonas syringae. Let me know if that works.

1801: 759: 133: 1429: 4903: 4863: 4838: 4772:. Most GMO-related articles are also fairly mature articles, and are going to be hard for a new editor to make improvements to even apart from the 1RR issue. 4125:. What you're seeing was an intent to balance describing the controversy with other policy, so while tweaking could be done, some vagueness was intended too. 1247:

it is expected that some of them should have reported undesired differences between GMOs and conventional crops even if no such differences exist in reality.

644: 256: 252: 248: 244: 4813: 1048:

of review by the scientific community, has frequently been distorted by the media and often used politically and inappropriately in anti-GE crops campaigns.

814: 4589:

Please remove this website: wple.net/plek/numery_2007/numer-10-2007/908-912-koszowskigoniewicz-czogala.pdf from article. This is new website about nutres.

1435: 1334: 1062:"State of Food and Agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor. Health and environmental impacts of transgenic crops" 32: 4913: 2076:

It may be overturned only by another widely published full 30-day RfC, a consensus of administrators at WP:AE, or by decree of the Arbitration Committee.

749: 3431:

to be used there). Don't let that stop you making any suggestions as myself and a few other editors are familiar with what can and can't be done there.

426: 389: 4918: 4853: 1942: 489: 620: 4823: 139: 4883: 4803: 4294: 4122: 2777:

I can't think of or find any ther methods so got rid of the e.g and just mentioned those two methods. Used usually just in case and added a cite.

1906: 894: 805: 782: 725: 4898: 4858: 4514:

I think you did an amazing job, the whole thing is much better now, including the "controversy" section. Happy to pass the well-deserved GA. --

2619:– I would be careful here. "Vital" seems not the the correct word, as there are other means of curing diseases, GMOs are not "vital" for this. 2570: 2435: 1890:

any part or whole of the text above in the article, including its wording and citations. There is no prejudice against editing other text. Any

53: 2023:

formatting is not the worst thing in the world, and it is important not to start down the road of small changes to the consensus paragraph. --

46: 2591: 2393:

Having a little bit of trouble parsing that, but get the bottom line that it is ready to go. Thanks for your read through, much appreciated.

1375: 2622:

Changed to important and re wrote the sentence to emphasise that this refers to GMOs as the creation of model organisms for human diseases.

222: 4908: 4873: 3553:

Nope, unless you count salmon. Added a sentence to the first paragraph of the animal section to indicate what has been approved and where.

2694:– Bit vague, when was it not used? Besides, any term would not be used before coming into use, so the sentence does not make a clear point. 2462: 2340: 513: 306: 84: 1259: 593: 550: 189: 2644:– what about other lifeforms, such as bacteria and fungy? Maybe say "life forms" instead? Same issue repeats on several other locations. 4848: 2236:(I am fine with it, but realise it is borderline) and missing info (maybe a definition section of what is a GMO, but that is covered in 4798: 319: 3857: 4357:

I would strongly recommend to replace all blog (and similar) sources with the respective scientific paper, or to at least cite both.

2547: 915: 716: 677: 602: 153: 38: 4726: 3988: 3966: 3853: 315: 158: 74: 1363:. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food. European Commission, European Union. 2010. 498: 4808: 3941:

Could not find anything suitable so used the Literacy one. If this is a problem I could use individual sources for each country.

3636:

I could find said American too. I can go through and standardize to American unless anyone has strong objections to this change?

128: 4081:

here. Considering the potential legwork needed, maybe that's more relevant of the comprehensive scope for an FA instead of GA?

3256:– Tobaco is not an originally engineered plant. Maybe reword "It was the first plant to be altered using genetic engineering"? 3026:

Application of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and other bacteria can help protect crops from insect infestation and plant diseases

2692:

The term GMO originally was not used until it became common through popular media to the point even scientists began to use it.

1898: 1578:

These principles dictate a case-by-case premarket assessment that includes an evaluation of both direct and unintended effects.

1287:

It is therefore not surprising that efforts to require labeling and to ban GMOs have been a growing political issue in the USA

183: 3852:

I have had a tremendous amount of difficulty finding sources on the regulation in lab as opposed to the release. When I wrote

1981:

articles (and will do the same for viruses and bacteria soon) so if this is trimmed the information will not be lost. Regards

364: 4868: 1929:

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available

1519: 4659:#3, bullet 4. Generally no hyphens after -ly adverbs because they are already assumed to be modifying the subsequent word. – 4416:

Would it make sense to include international regulations in the "regulations" section also (i.e, the Cartagena Protocol)? --

2364:

I don't expect that to affect anything I'll be doing. Hopefully I'll have everything wrapped before Tuesday or close to it.

1641: 119: 2057:

Yes, even adding more recent sources would require either: a new RfC of equivalent prominence, or a consensus of admins at

4672: 4450:

Thanks. This was exactly what I was looking for in a review. I will work through these with KofA over the next few days.

4017:– the issues listed in the previous sentence are not (at least not all of them) ethical. I suggest to remove the "other". 2434:

Okay the nomination is up. It could take a while for it to be picked up, but if anyone is interested the page to watch is

882: 323: 311: 179: 78: 2165:

Sorry to do this to you, but I think you introduced the cite error. It was not present when I finished editing last night

616: 3550:

GMO lifestock: You are listing several, but without stating if these have already been approved somewhere. I guess not?

2344: 1425: 588: 3917:

To get a more worldwide view, maybe mention the (apparently only three) countries where GMO foods are banned entirely?

3526:

Human alpha-1-antitrypsin is another protein that has been produced and is used in treating humans with this deficiency

3054:– you write "the ice plus bacteria", but this term was not formerly mentioned, and deserves explanation and/or a link. 4744:

The companies involved in the controversies how they function in the process of GMOs and chemicals tied to crop GMOs.

3028:– How does this work? How do you apply a bacterium? Do you mean specific genes or proteins taken from this bacterium? 1978: 1619:

environment. As with all novel foods, safety assessments in relation to GM foods must be made on a case-by-case basis.

1590: 3898:

consistent across most major scientific players so I imagine the reulations themselves don't play much role in this.

1357: 327: 229: 4063: 4051: 1974: 1844:"The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case-Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics" 268: 239: 4568: 4231:

of a primary source at least I have watch listed that's at least better quality in a parity sense. There are some

1969:

process, but thought I would solicit any opinions first. Basically I was trying to keep this a companion piece to

163: 4519: 4421: 4388: 4338: 4107: 3453: 3397: 3345:

The more obvious advantage to moving pathways is to express greater amounts so removed the better products part.

3342:– better is too vague and not neutral. There are many people who would not consider any GMO product as "better". 2987: 2606: 2585: 951: 937: 923: 3729:

Not sure about abundant. I was trying to say that transposon editing techniques were well developed. Reworded.

2566: 2233: 606: 279: 4690: 4631: 4383:– does not fit together (genes are genes, proteins are proteins). What are cry proteins, can this be linked? -- 954:

safety, broadly construed. This may only be overturned by another widely advertised 30-day RfC, a consensus of

4062:

depending on what's being asked. There have been talk page discussions about things like that in the past and

3921: 2466: 2175:. Anyway it is really a minor issue, easily solved. I only mention it here because it was assumed I caused it. 370: 2172:

diff. Going back to the original addition of the paragraph in July 2016 it did not use <ref name=AMA/: -->

4594: 3204:

and as of 2016 two genetically modified yeasts involved in the fermentation of wine have been commercialised

1594: 4714: 3392:, very interesting, and important article. Looks very good. I copy edited as I went. More comments soon. -- 2472: 610: 195: 4505: 4241: 4190: 4148: 4134: 4086: 3813: 3681: 3641: 2732: 2707: 2384: 2369: 2330: 2282: 3676:

hassle by going to American now since it'll be copy-edited now anyways. I'll take care of that in a bit.

109: 20: 4755: 4722: 4646: 4479:

I think I hve gone through most of the comments now. Sorry it took a while. Let me know what you think.

3632:

I could find was generalize (as opposed to generalise) making the default American English and the most

3575: 3370:

Found a better wikilink, Can add an example or explanation if you want, but would rather use wikilinks.

3153:

Another approach is to use vectors to create novel vaccines for diseases that have no vaccines available

2774:"certain stresses (e.g. thermal or electric shock)." – maybe "(e.g. thermal stress or electric shock)"? 813:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

724:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

434:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

4711:

the companies that drive these controversial topics and how they are involved in the process of GMOS.

4590: 4100:

Although doubts have been raised, most studies have found growing GM crops to be beneficial to farmers.

3501:

The development of the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system has effectively halved the amount of time needed

1891: 1335:"AAAS Board of Directors: Legally Mandating GM Food Labels Could 'Mislead and Falsely Alarm Consumers'" 124: 3570:

Text and refs added to indicate being sold in Canada as of 2017, not yet (as of Feb 2019) sold in US.

1398: 322:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 4777: 4543: 4515: 4470: 4417: 4384: 4334: 4103: 3449: 3425: 3393: 2983: 2602: 2581: 2488: 2315: 2267: 2209: 2141: 2106: 2066: 2028: 1179: 984: 4078: 3613:

The article is supposed to be in British English, right? Whatch out for American spellings, such as

3184:

Not my area, but I tried to explain it as best I could (had to try and understand it myself first).

1464: 609:

articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly

42: 4686: 4627: 4232: 3992: 3651: 2237: 1970: 1212: 598: 215: 4059: 3655: 3625: 2876:

The first genetically modified animal to be approved for food use was AquAdvantage salmon in 2015.

2116: 2081:

Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)/Archive 147#Transcluding article content into other articles

2000: 1875: 963: 897:

for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

4604:

I've retrieved a Wayback Machine archive from 2013 for this page and amended it to the citation.

4312:

Anyway, thanks for your patience, this section could take a while to get acceptable to everyone.

2160: 1950: 1715: 1550: 581: 284: 4626:"modified"? I don't know whether or not I'm right about that. Any input is appreciated. Thanks, 4055: 2226:. In fact the cause of the issue was another good faith user who combined the cites 2 weeks ago. 1311: 955: 565: 544: 3805: 1824: 1061: 4664: 4501: 4488: 4474: 4459: 4439: 4406: 4370: 4321: 4260: 4237: 4213: 4186: 4167: 4144: 4130: 4082: 4029: 4004: 3978: 3950: 3933: 3907: 3887: 3869: 3839: 3809: 3788: 3763: 3738: 3713: 3677: 3667: 3637: 3603: 3562: 3540: 3515: 3490: 3440: 3415: 3379: 3354: 3329: 3304: 3268: 3243: 3218: 3193: 3168: 3142: 3117: 3092: 3066: 3041: 3015: 2974: 2949: 2924: 2890: 2865: 2840: 2815: 2786: 2764: 2728: 2703: 2681: 2656: 2631: 2447: 2402: 2380: 2365: 2356: 2326: 2301: 2278: 2253: 2191: 2128: 2092: 1990: 1905:, edited further, and then copied to this page. The former pages' edit histories now serve to 1894:

administrator may use discretionary sanctions against editors who repeatedly breach this rule.

1761: 1697: 1570: 1436:"Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health (A-12): Labeling of Bioengineered Foods" 1372: 1279: 1235: 1228: 1164: 1117: 1036: 922:

discretionary sanctions regarding the language used to summarize the safety and regulation of

692: 671: 431: 105: 2241: 1879: 1465:"Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms: United States. Public and Scholarly Opinion" 4751: 4718: 4642: 3571: 2048: 1753: 1688: 1680: 1668: 1562: 1504:

Overall finding on purported adverse effects on human health of foods derived from GE crops:

1364: 1271: 1220: 1194: 1156: 1108: 1100: 1028: 575: 281: 4781: 4769: 4759: 4730: 4694: 4680: 4650: 4635: 4608: 4598: 4547: 4523: 4509: 4491: 4462: 4442: 4425: 4409: 4392: 4373: 4342: 4324: 4263: 4245: 4223: 4216: 4194: 4181: 4170: 4152: 4138: 4111: 4090: 4032: 4007: 3981: 3953: 3936: 3910: 3890: 3872: 3842: 3817: 3791: 3766: 3741: 3716: 3685: 3670: 3645: 3606: 3579: 3565: 3543: 3518: 3493: 3457: 3443: 3418: 3401: 3382: 3357: 3332: 3307: 3271: 3246: 3221: 3196: 3171: 3145: 3120: 3095: 3069: 3044: 3018: 2991: 2977: 2952: 2927: 2893: 2868: 2843: 2818: 2789: 2767: 2736: 2711: 2684: 2659: 2634: 2610: 2595: 2492: 2476: 2450: 2405: 2388: 2373: 2359: 2334: 2319: 2304: 2286: 2271: 2256: 2213: 2194: 2145: 2131: 2110: 2095: 2070: 2052: 2032: 1993: 1954: 941: 4773: 4539: 4397:

Cry proteins are delta endotoxins (they link to the same page). Reworded to make clearer.

3503:– How does that relate to the previous info? Does it allow to change stem cells directly? 2484: 2311: 2263: 2205: 2137: 2119:

so hopefully that helps prevent these good faith edits and saves everyone a bit of angst.

2102: 2062: 2024: 1739:"Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States" 1507:

implicate a higher risk to human health from GE foods than from their non-GE counterparts.

1013: 418: 383: 2982:

I meant you could avoid repeating "product" if you would delete the word "production". --

2617:

vital to the discovery and development of cures and treatments for many serious diseases.

2058: 1966: 1874:

This wording has been implemented into this article per the result of the RfC above. The

959: 283: 1213:"Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons" 2747: 1692: 1244:

data presented in these articles does not provide any substantial evidence of GMO harm.

1112: 810: 708: 2752:– suboptimal wording, I suggest to simply write "This gene can be taken from a cell". 474: 4792: 3406:

Thanks for doing this. I will work through these today and comment below each point.

2229:

Anyway, I didn't start this section to go diff diving so hopefully this clears it up.

1946: 1934: 1778: 1312:"Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods" 404: 4660: 4605: 4480: 4451: 4431: 4398: 4362: 4313: 4252: 4205: 4159: 4021: 3996: 3970: 3942: 3925: 3899: 3879: 3861: 3831: 3780: 3755: 3730: 3705: 3659: 3595: 3554: 3532: 3507: 3482: 3432: 3407: 3389: 3371: 3346: 3321: 3296: 3260: 3235: 3210: 3185: 3160: 3134: 3109: 3084: 3058: 3033: 3007: 2966: 2941: 2916: 2882: 2857: 2832: 2828:– Maybe an explanation (what is tissue plasminogen activatior) would be good here. 2807: 2778: 2756: 2673: 2648: 2623: 2439: 2394: 2348: 2293: 2245: 2183: 2120: 2084: 1982: 2083:). The hidden text is a good idea though and I will add it to the other articles. 1684: 1599: 1493:. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US). 2016. p. 149 1224: 1141: 3825:

say that absent scientific evidence of harm even voluntary labeling is misleading

3650:

I probably wrote 80% of the current article (if not more) and while not British,

1160: 1032: 1014:"An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" 1012:

Nicolia, Alessandro; Manzo, Alberto; Veronesi, Fabio; Rosellini, Daniele (2013).

3920:

Curious where you got the three number from, it may be outdated. Looking at the

2222:

and it was already present elsewhere before I started the latest round of edits

2044: 2008: 1925: 1104: 2881:

USA. Added a second sentence mentioning that they are raised in Panama as well

1738: 4656: 2940:

I have some examples at the end of the paragraph. Do you think it needs more?

1490: 1298:

more precise and, in most cases, less likely to create an unexpected outcome."

702: 698: 571: 522: 4538:

Congrats and appreciation to all the editors who raised this page to a GA! --

1757: 1231: 1198: 1142:"A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants" 4707:

During my research on crops and their modification it should be noted under

1088: 797: 776: 721: 4622:

Shouldn't it be "genetically-modified organism", as "genetically" modifies

2573:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 1764: 1700: 1573: 1282: 1238: 1167: 1120: 1039: 1551:"Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects" 3726:– what does "well developed" mean here? Maybe write "abundant" instead? 3057:

Its just a way to differentiate from the ice-minus strain. Will reword.

2720:

I would suggest to name the section "definition" instead of "etymology".

1882:

to implement the result of this RfC. After implementation, editors must

1566: 3284:

Clarified. Arabidopsis is up there too, but this is made implied later.

2798: 1317:. American Association for the Advancement of Science. October 20, 2012 1909:

for that content, and must not be deleted so long as this page exists.

1275: 2806:

went with induced other bacteria as it would have been more than one

1399:"AMA Report on Genetically Modified Crops and Foods (online summary)" 3624:

I didn't notice British variants being used before, but in terms of

2079:

have reservations trancluding article content in article space (see

4176:

least. No strong feelings on any of my edits in the section really.

1903:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms

1600:"Genetically modified foods and health: a second interim statement" 4741:

Hello, I would like to add this into the controversies section.

3003:– again, I think we need to know which countries this applies to. 1368: 1211:

Panchin, Alexander Y.; Tuzhikov, Alexander I. (January 14, 2016).

1089:"Plant Genetics, Sustainable Agriculture and Global Food Security" 3279:

As such the transgenic tools and procedures are well established

2347:

over the next few days so hopefully I will keep out of your way.

2007:. Even if it is just an issue of formatting the citations – ping 936:

the following language to summarize the safety and regulation of

4641:

Has been without hyphen for years. Assume there is a consensus.

3801:– you consistently spell it like this, but isn't it "nematode"? 2826:

engineered to produce human tissue plasminogen activator in 1987

4556: 3231:– unprecise. Does it refer to flowers, or to colors of crops? 3181:– Maybe a short explanation here to get an idea how it works? 3155:– How does this work? Maybe try to provide some general idea? 2912:– Model organisms are species, but Bacteria is a large clade. 1716:"Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe" 902: 864: 335: 293: 285: 69: 15: 3478:– "as in plants"? "as for plants"? I'm not a native speaker. 4077:

in the daughter/granddaughter articles before assessing the

2801:

and then induced another bacteria to incorporate the plasmid

530:

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

521: 497: 473: 4381:

in the form of delta endotoxin genes known as cry proteins.

3991:

is better suited to that). I could add the table I made at

1714:

Final Report of the PABE research project (December 2001).

1260:"Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health" 944:(RfC). This decision applies to all articles listed in the 1520:"Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods" 3103:

set back the development of this approach for many years.

2803:– "induced other bacteria" or "induced another bacterium 1491:"Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects" 1064:. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 3827:– should it be "in the absence of scientific evidence"? 3633: 3629: 2232:

I was hoping to get some opinions on broad issues like

2227: 2223: 2219: 2180: 2173: 2169: 2166: 2039: 890: 886: 877: 59: 3658:

to an American version I am not going to to fight it.

214: 1920:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

1642:"Public and Scientists' Views on Science and Society" 1337:. American Association for the Advancement of Science 4829:

Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Technology

3006:

Best source I found was dated 2015 so used "as of".

1825:"Over Half of E.U. Countries Are Opting Out of GMOs" 1180:"An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment" 926:

on this and related articles (including talk pages).

809:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 720:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 430:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4879:

WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles

3704:DavidMD has added some more info on the countries. 3506:Yep. It is pretty much a game breaker. Elucidated. 3367:– maybe add an accessible explanation in brackets. 3365:

plants can modify the proteins post-translationally

3254:

It was the first plant to be genetically engineered

2667:

with genes by introduced, eliminated, or rearranged

2310:

if there is something specific where I can help. --

1737:Scott, Sydney E.; Inbar, Yoel; Rozin, Paul (2016). 228: 4685:Good point, CWenger. I hadn't read that. Regards, 3108:Added date of Jesse Gelsinger trial to sentence. 464:This article has not yet received a rating on the 3001:Food products from genetically modified bacteria 1779:"Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms" 1669:"Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths" 1358:"A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010)" 1140:Domingo, José L.; Bordonaba, Jordi Giné (2011). 960:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 87:for general discussion of the article's subject. 45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1842:Lynch, Diahanna; Vogel, David (April 5, 2001). 4553:Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2020 3749:in its egg passed regulatory approval in 2015. 3340:to produce greater volume and better products. 3281:– but only for tabacco? Maybe make this clear 2601:Reviewing now, but I might take a few days. -- 1264:Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 4844:Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles 950:section of the RfC, and on other articles on 597:to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of the 444:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Molecular Biology 8: 4889:Molecular Biology articles needing attention 4819:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Technology 3804:Changed to nematode. Nemotode looks to be a 3724:Transposons are well developed in Drosophila 3528:– but is this also from the mentioned goat? 3128:Herpes simplex viruses is a promising vector 2461:Why is this article protected from editing? 1640:Funk, Cary; Rainie, Lee (January 29, 2015). 1401:. American Medical Association. January 2001 4929:Top-importance and Start-Class MCB articles 3295:Online databases and such. Have said this. 3052:they can compete with the ice-plus bacteria 2898:FDA approved in the US, but as of Feb 2019 3594:No. Like most of the others it is the US. 2502: 2470: 1593:, advocate further caution based upon the 1589:Some medical organizations, including the 990: 969: 868: 823:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science Policy 771: 666: 539: 378: 1943:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1691: 1605:. British Medical Association. March 2004 1111: 509:the Molecular and Cell Biology task force 3476:the end aims are much the same as plants 2910:Bacteria are the simplest model organism 2831:Added a wikilink and short explanation. 1823:Sifferlin, Alexandra (October 3, 2015). 875:Text and/or other creative content from 4924:High-importance Science Policy articles 4894:All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages 4295:Genetically modified food controversies 4123:Genetically modified food controversies 4050:Most of that subject matter deals with 3967:Genetically modified food in Asia#China 3699:It obtained regulatory approval in 2015 2962:– is "reduce toxic byproducts" enough? 2533: 2505: 2220:addition of the paragraph after the RFC 1941:Above undated message substituted from 1333:Pinholster, Ginger (October 25, 2012). 1187:Science, Technology, & Human Values 1004: 773: 668: 629:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Environment 541: 380: 4814:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles 2937:– Maybe add which foods they produce? 2647:Yeah that should cover all organisms. 2571:Talk:Genetically modified organism/GA1 2436:Talk:Genetically modified organism/GA1 2075: 447:Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology 4834:GA-Class vital articles in Technology 3808:though I didn't know about until now. 3589:to become publicly available as a pet 2483:To prevent vandalism and the like. -- 2218:I really didn't. It was never in the 1746:Perspectives on Psychological Science 734:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology 7: 4737:Controversies GMO companies involved 4703:GMO companies and their involvement. 4333:That's it. Good overview overall. -- 3290:has abundant bioinformatic resources 2341:Template:Genetic engineering sidebar 1718:. Commission of European Communities 1441:. American Medical Association. 2012 1289:(citing Domingo and Bordonaba, 2011) 803:This article is within the scope of 714:This article is within the scope of 424:This article is within the scope of 341: 339: 4904:Mid-importance Environment articles 4864:Genetics articles needing attention 4839:GA-Class Molecular Biology articles 4430:Added to the start, plus Asilomar. 1781:. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015 1467:. Library of Congress. June 9, 2015 1045:connected with the use of GM crops. 826:Template:WikiProject Science Policy 77:for discussing improvements to the 3776:– developmental biology research? 1800:Bashshur, Ramona (February 2013). 14: 4914:Mid-importance sociology articles 3989:Regulation of genetic engineering 3858:from the University of Woolongong 3854:Regulation of genetic engineering 2960:reduce toxic byproduct production 1549:Haslberger, Alexander G. (2003). 1414:(from online summary prepared by 1294:peer-reviewed literature to date. 1217:Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 1021:Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 104:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 41:. If you can improve it further, 4919:GA-Class Science Policy articles 4854:Top-importance Genetics articles 4560: 2339:Thanks. I am going to play with 1924: 906: 796: 775: 701: 691: 670: 632:Template:WikiProject Environment 617:Knowledge (XXG):Contributing FAQ 574: 564: 543: 417: 403: 382: 349: 340: 297: 267: 99:Click here to start a new topic. 19: 4824:GA-Class level-4 vital articles 3774:are used in development biology 3229:to create new colours in plants 2642:says that the plants or animals 1899:Talk:Genetically modified crops 930:On July 7, 2016, the community 843:This article has been rated as 754:This article has been rated as 649:This article has been rated as 4884:MCB articles needing attention 4804:Natural sciences good articles 3448:Great! Last comments below! -- 2900:still not being SOLD in the US 1846:. Council on Foreign Relations 1087:Ronald, Pamela (May 5, 2011). 737:Template:WikiProject Sociology 619:and leave any messages at the 369:It is of interest to multiple 33:Natural sciences good articles 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 4899:GA-Class Environment articles 4859:WikiProject Genetics articles 4799:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 4548:22:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC) 4524:18:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC) 4510:20:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 4492:09:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 4443:09:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 4410:09:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 4374:09:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 4264:20:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 4246:17:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 4217:08:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 4033:07:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 4008:07:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 3982:08:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 3954:22:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 3937:08:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 3911:08:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 3891:08:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 2878:– Approved in which country? 2320:21:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC) 2305:08:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC) 2287:20:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC) 2272:20:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 2257:16:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 2214:22:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 2195:21:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 2146:20:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 2132:16:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 2111:22:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 2096:22:11, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 2071:21:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 2053:21:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 2033:20:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 1994:09:45, 25 December 2018 (UTC) 1258:Yang, Y.T.; Chen, B. (2016). 1225:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684 883:Genetically modified organism 817:and see a list of open tasks. 728:and see a list of open tasks. 506:This article is supported by 482:This article is supported by 438:and see a list of open tasks. 427:WikiProject Molecular Biology 324:Genetically modified organism 312:Genetically modified organism 310:for general discussion about 96:Put new text under old text. 79:Genetically modified organism 27:Genetically modified organism 4782:23:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 4760:01:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 4731:00:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 4609:16:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC) 4599:10:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC) 4463:08:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC) 4426:14:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 4393:14:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 4353:My apologies, I forgot two: 4343:12:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 4325:09:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 4195:21:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 4171:09:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 4153:05:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 4139:03:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 4112:09:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 4091:22:02, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3873:22:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 3856:the best source I found was 3843:22:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 3818:22:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 3792:22:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 3767:22:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 3742:22:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 3717:22:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 3686:22:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 3671:09:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 3646:05:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 3607:22:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 3591:– but not worldwide, right? 3580:01:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 3566:10:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC) 3544:10:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC) 3519:10:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC) 3494:10:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC) 3481:As for sounds better to me. 3458:12:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3444:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3419:18:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 3402:20:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC) 3383:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3358:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3333:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3315:(actually lavender or mauve) 3308:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3272:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3247:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3222:09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3197:01:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3172:00:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 3146:08:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 3130:– mixes plural and singular 3121:08:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 3096:08:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 3080:– Maybe in plural, Viruses? 3070:08:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 3045:08:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 3019:08:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 2992:12:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 2978:23:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2953:23:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2928:23:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2894:23:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2869:23:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2844:23:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2819:23:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2790:22:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2768:22:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2737:05:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2712:05:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2685:22:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2660:22:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2635:22:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 2611:21:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 2596:21:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 2493:20:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC) 2477:19:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC) 2451:04:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC) 2345:Template:Genetic engineering 2234:Knowledge (XXG):Article size 1955:22:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 1802:"FDA and Regulation of GMOs" 1161:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.003 1033:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595 4909:GA-Class sociology articles 4874:Mid-importance MCB articles 4583:to reactivate your request. 4571:has been answered. Set the 3317:– please link these colors 3292:– I don't understand this. 3206:– again, in which country? 2853:– can you link or explain? 2406:06:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 2389:06:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC) 2374:05:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC) 2360:08:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC) 2335:02:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC) 1979:Genetically modified animal 1897:The wording was created at 1685:10.1093/embo-reports/kve142 1591:British Medical Association 1522:. World Health Organization 1105:10.1534/genetics.111.128553 4945: 4849:GA-Class Genetics articles 4695:11:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 4681:19:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC) 4651:18:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC) 4185:for another day after GA. 4052:Genetically modified crops 2669:– something missing here? 2224:search ref name="AMA" here 1975:Genetically modified plant 1804:. American Bar Association 849:project's importance scale 806:WikiProject Science Policy 760:project's importance scale 655:project's importance scale 450:Molecular Biology articles 4636:04:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC) 2965:Don't quite follow this. 2746:This can be taken from a 2136:Thanks for doing that. -- 1424:(from original report by 1178:Krimsky, Sheldon (2015). 1149:Environment International 952:genetically modified food 938:genetically modified food 924:genetically modified food 881:was copied or moved into 842: 791: 753: 686: 648: 559: 529: 505: 481: 463: 412: 377: 134:Be welcoming to newcomers 3922:Genetic Literacy Project 3754:Another one for the US. 1758:10.1177/1745691615621275 1199:10.1177/0162243915598381 4809:GA-Class vital articles 4229:here’s a recent example 1880:discretionary sanctions 1667:Marris, Claire (2001). 1595:precautionary principle 829:Science Policy articles 594:WikiProject Environment 591:article is part of the 485:the Genetics task force 3634:recent comment in 2014 2017:<ref name=AMA/: --> 1866: 962:, or by ruling of the 601:. The aim is to write 526: 502: 478: 129:avoid personal attacks 57:: February 21, 2019. ( 4869:GA-Class MCB articles 1933:. Student editor(s): 1876:Arbitration Committee 1644:. Pew Research Center 981: 964:Arbitration Committee 916:Arbitration Committee 717:WikiProject Sociology 525: 501: 477: 363:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 356:level-4 vital article 261:Auto-archiving period 154:Neutral point of view 39:good article criteria 4015:Other ethical issues 2168:and came about with 1961:Article improvements 1555:Nature Biotechnology 985:scientific consensus 974:Language per the RfC 889:. The former page's 635:Environment articles 314:. Any such comments 159:No original research 4041:Controversy section 3993:Genetic engineering 3083:Yeah, makes sense. 2797:inserted it into a 2750:containing the gene 2238:Genetic engineering 2005:must not be altered 1971:genetic engineering 1907:provide attribution 1901:and then copied to 1567:10.1038/nbt0703-739 942:request for comment 895:provide attribution 878:Genetic engineering 589:environment-related 4349:Forgotten comments 2672:Removed the "by". 2457:Protected articles 1931:on the course page 740:sociology articles 582:Environment portal 527: 503: 479: 365:content assessment 309: 140:dispute resolution 101: 4717:comment added by 4587: 4586: 3652:my native variant 3470:Convenience break 2561: 2560: 2479: 2244:I am aiming for. 2164: 1915: 1914: 1871: 1870: 1865: 1864: 1377:978-92-79-16344-9 1276:10.1002/jsfa.7523 901: 900: 863: 862: 859: 858: 855: 854: 770: 769: 766: 765: 665: 664: 661: 660: 621:project talk page 538: 537: 534: 533: 441:Molecular Biology 432:Molecular Biology 390:Molecular Biology 334: 333: 305: 292: 291: 120:Assume good faith 97: 68: 67: 64: 4936: 4733: 4677: 4669: 4625: 4578: 4574: 4564: 4563: 4557: 4478: 3806:British spelling 3531:Yep. Clarified. 3429: 3209:USA and Canada. 2851:ice-minus strain 2515:Copyvio detector 2503: 2158: 2018: 1957: 1928: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1851: 1839: 1833: 1832: 1820: 1814: 1813: 1811: 1809: 1797: 1791: 1790: 1788: 1786: 1775: 1769: 1768: 1743: 1734: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1723: 1711: 1705: 1704: 1695: 1664: 1658: 1657: 1651: 1649: 1637: 1631: 1630: 1612: 1610: 1604: 1587: 1581: 1580: 1546: 1540: 1539: 1529: 1527: 1516: 1510: 1509: 1500: 1498: 1487: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1472: 1461: 1455: 1453: 1448: 1446: 1440: 1422: 1408: 1406: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1386: 1384: 1362: 1354: 1348: 1346: 1344: 1342: 1330: 1324: 1322: 1316: 1308: 1302: 1301: 1256: 1250: 1206: 1184: 1175: 1146: 1135: 1129: 1128: 1115: 1084: 1078: 1077: 1071: 1069: 1058: 1052: 1051: 1018: 1009: 991: 970: 910: 909: 903: 880: 872: 871: 865: 831: 830: 827: 824: 821: 800: 793: 792: 787: 779: 772: 742: 741: 738: 735: 732: 711: 706: 705: 695: 688: 687: 682: 674: 667: 637: 636: 633: 630: 627: 584: 579: 578: 568: 561: 560: 555: 547: 540: 466:importance scale 452: 451: 448: 445: 442: 421: 414: 413: 408: 407: 406: 401: 386: 379: 362: 353: 352: 345: 344: 343: 336: 301: 300: 294: 286: 272: 271: 262: 233: 232: 218: 149:Article policies 70: 62: 60:Reviewed version 51: 23: 16: 4944: 4943: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4789: 4788: 4739: 4712: 4705: 4676: 4673: 4668: 4665: 4623: 4617: 4576: 4572: 4561: 4555: 4536: 4516:Jens Lallensack 4471:Jens Lallensack 4468: 4418:Jens Lallensack 4385:Jens Lallensack 4351: 4335:Jens Lallensack 4104:Jens Lallensack 4043: 3472: 3450:Jens Lallensack 3426:Jens Lallensack 3423: 3394:Jens Lallensack 3105:When was that? 2984:Jens Lallensack 2603:Jens Lallensack 2582:Jens Lallensack 2565:This review is 2557: 2529: 2501: 2459: 2343:and update the 2016: 1963: 1940: 1922: 1878:has authorized 1867: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1849: 1847: 1841: 1840: 1836: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1807: 1805: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1784: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1721: 1719: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1647: 1645: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1608: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1588: 1584: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1525: 1523: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1496: 1494: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1470: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1444: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1404: 1402: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1382: 1380: 1378: 1360: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1340: 1338: 1332: 1320: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1257: 1254: 1210: 1182: 1177: 1144: 1139: 1136: 1132: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1067: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1006: 996: 975: 907: 876: 869: 845:High-importance 828: 825: 822: 819: 818: 786:High‑importance 785: 739: 736: 733: 730: 729: 707: 700: 680: 634: 631: 628: 625: 624: 607:well-referenced 580: 573: 553: 449: 446: 443: 440: 439: 402: 392: 360: 350: 298: 288: 287: 282: 259: 175: 170: 169: 168: 145: 115: 58: 12: 11: 5: 4942: 4940: 4932: 4931: 4926: 4921: 4916: 4911: 4906: 4901: 4896: 4891: 4886: 4881: 4876: 4871: 4866: 4861: 4856: 4851: 4846: 4841: 4836: 4831: 4826: 4821: 4816: 4811: 4806: 4801: 4791: 4790: 4787: 4786: 4785: 4784: 4738: 4735: 4704: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4687:DesertPipeline 4674: 4666: 4653: 4628:DesertPipeline 4616: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4585: 4584: 4565: 4554: 4551: 4535: 4534:Congrats on GA 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4495: 4494: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4350: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4299: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4201: 4177: 4126: 4115: 4114: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4042: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4012: 4011: 4010: 3984: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3939: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3619: 3618: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3471: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3023: 3022: 3021: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2696: 2695: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2600: 2576: 2575: 2559: 2558: 2556: 2555: 2550: 2545: 2539: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2528: 2527: 2525:External links 2522: 2517: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2500: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2475:comment added 2463:50.107.133.126 2458: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2322: 2230: 2201: 2176: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2073: 2020: 1962: 1959: 1921: 1918: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1895: 1869: 1868: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1834: 1815: 1792: 1770: 1752:(3): 315–324. 1729: 1706: 1659: 1632: 1582: 1541: 1511: 1482: 1456: 1390: 1376: 1349: 1303: 1255: 1137:But see also: 1130: 1079: 1053: 1003: 1002: 1001: 998: 997: 994: 980: 977: 976: 973: 968: 967: 956:administrators 911: 899: 898: 893:now serves to 873: 861: 860: 857: 856: 853: 852: 841: 835: 834: 832: 820:Science Policy 815:the discussion 811:Science policy 801: 789: 788: 783:Science Policy 780: 768: 767: 764: 763: 756:Mid-importance 752: 746: 745: 743: 726:the discussion 713: 712: 709:Society portal 696: 684: 683: 681:Mid‑importance 675: 663: 662: 659: 658: 651:Mid-importance 647: 641: 640: 638: 614: 586: 585: 569: 557: 556: 554:Mid‑importance 548: 536: 535: 532: 531: 528: 518: 517: 514:Mid-importance 504: 494: 493: 490:Top-importance 480: 470: 469: 462: 456: 455: 453: 436:the discussion 422: 410: 409: 387: 375: 374: 368: 346: 332: 331: 328:Reference desk 316:may be removed 302: 290: 289: 280: 278: 277: 274: 273: 235: 234: 172: 171: 167: 166: 161: 156: 147: 146: 144: 143: 136: 131: 122: 116: 114: 113: 102: 93: 92: 89: 88: 82: 66: 65: 50: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4941: 4930: 4927: 4925: 4922: 4920: 4917: 4915: 4912: 4910: 4907: 4905: 4902: 4900: 4897: 4895: 4892: 4890: 4887: 4885: 4882: 4880: 4877: 4875: 4872: 4870: 4867: 4865: 4862: 4860: 4857: 4855: 4852: 4850: 4847: 4845: 4842: 4840: 4837: 4835: 4832: 4830: 4827: 4825: 4822: 4820: 4817: 4815: 4812: 4810: 4807: 4805: 4802: 4800: 4797: 4796: 4794: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4771: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4748: 4745: 4742: 4736: 4734: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4716: 4710: 4709:controversies 4702: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4678: 4670: 4662: 4658: 4654: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4620: 4614: 4610: 4607: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4582: 4579:parameter to 4570: 4566: 4559: 4558: 4552: 4550: 4549: 4545: 4541: 4533: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4493: 4490: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4476: 4472: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4461: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4444: 4441: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4408: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4382: 4379: 4375: 4372: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4359: 4358: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4332: 4331: 4326: 4323: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4311: 4307: 4303: 4300: 4296: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4265: 4262: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4234: 4233:older reviews 4230: 4225: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4215: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4202: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4192: 4188: 4183: 4178: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4169: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4127: 4124: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4098: 4097: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4067:engineering). 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4048: 4045: 4044: 4040: 4034: 4031: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4019: 4018: 4016: 4013: 4009: 4006: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3994: 3990: 3985: 3983: 3980: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3968: 3963: 3962: 3959: 3955: 3952: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3940: 3938: 3935: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3923: 3919: 3918: 3916: 3912: 3909: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3896: 3892: 3889: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3871: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3850: 3848: 3844: 3841: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3829: 3828: 3826: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3802: 3800: 3797: 3793: 3790: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3778: 3777: 3775: 3772: 3768: 3765: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3753: 3752: 3750: 3747: 3743: 3740: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3728: 3727: 3725: 3722: 3718: 3715: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3703: 3702: 3701:– but where? 3700: 3697: 3696: 3687: 3683: 3679: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3669: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3593: 3592: 3590: 3587: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3552: 3551: 3549: 3545: 3542: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3530: 3529: 3527: 3524: 3520: 3517: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3505: 3504: 3502: 3499: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3480: 3479: 3477: 3474: 3473: 3469: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3442: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3427: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3388: 3384: 3381: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3369: 3368: 3366: 3363: 3359: 3356: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3344: 3343: 3341: 3338: 3334: 3331: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3319: 3318: 3316: 3313: 3309: 3306: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3294: 3293: 3291: 3288: 3283: 3282: 3280: 3277: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3258: 3257: 3255: 3252: 3248: 3245: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3233: 3232: 3230: 3227: 3223: 3220: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3208: 3207: 3205: 3202: 3198: 3195: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3183: 3182: 3180: 3177: 3173: 3170: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3157: 3156: 3154: 3151: 3147: 3144: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3133:Went plural. 3132: 3131: 3129: 3126: 3122: 3119: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3107: 3106: 3104: 3101: 3097: 3094: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3082: 3081: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3068: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3056: 3055: 3053: 3050: 3046: 3043: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3030: 3029: 3027: 3024: 3020: 3017: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3005: 3004: 3002: 2999: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2976: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2964: 2963: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2951: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2939: 2938: 2936: 2933: 2929: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2914: 2913: 2911: 2908: 2901: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2880: 2879: 2877: 2874: 2870: 2867: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2855: 2854: 2852: 2849: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2830: 2829: 2827: 2824: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2805: 2804: 2802: 2800: 2795: 2791: 2788: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2776: 2775: 2773: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2754: 2753: 2751: 2749: 2744: 2743: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2690: 2686: 2683: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2671: 2670: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2658: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2646: 2645: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2621: 2620: 2618: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2583: 2580: 2574: 2572: 2568: 2563: 2562: 2554: 2551: 2549: 2546: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2538: 2537: 2532: 2526: 2523: 2521: 2518: 2516: 2513: 2512: 2510: 2509: 2504: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2478: 2474: 2468: 2464: 2456: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2407: 2404: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2323: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2171: 2167: 2162: 2161:edit conflict 2157: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2118: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2082: 2077: 2074: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2021: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1960: 1958: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1938: 1936: 1932: 1927: 1919: 1917: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1872: 1845: 1838: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1819: 1816: 1803: 1796: 1793: 1780: 1774: 1771: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1740: 1733: 1730: 1717: 1710: 1707: 1702: 1699: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1643: 1636: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1601: 1596: 1592: 1586: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1521: 1515: 1512: 1508: 1505: 1492: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1466: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1437: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1421: 1419: 1417: 1400: 1394: 1391: 1379: 1374: 1370: 1369:10.2777/97784 1366: 1359: 1353: 1350: 1347: 1336: 1329: 1313: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1295: 1290: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1270:: 1851–1855. 1269: 1265: 1261: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1240: 1237: 1233: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1209: 1208:And contrast: 1205: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1181: 1176: 1174: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1143: 1134: 1131: 1127: 1122: 1119: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1063: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1015: 1008: 1005: 1000: 999: 993: 992: 989: 986: 979: 978: 972: 971: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 948: 943: 939: 935: 934: 929: 928: 927: 925: 921: 917: 912: 905: 904: 896: 892: 888: 884: 879: 874: 867: 866: 850: 846: 840: 837: 836: 833: 816: 812: 808: 807: 802: 799: 795: 794: 790: 784: 781: 778: 774: 761: 757: 751: 748: 747: 744: 727: 723: 719: 718: 710: 704: 699: 697: 694: 690: 689: 685: 679: 676: 673: 669: 656: 652: 646: 643: 642: 639: 622: 618: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 595: 590: 583: 577: 572: 570: 567: 563: 562: 558: 552: 549: 546: 542: 524: 520: 519: 515: 512:(assessed as 511: 510: 500: 496: 495: 491: 488:(assessed as 487: 486: 476: 472: 471: 467: 461: 458: 457: 454: 437: 433: 429: 428: 423: 420: 416: 415: 411: 400: 396: 391: 388: 385: 381: 376: 372: 366: 358: 357: 347: 338: 337: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 308: 304:This page is 303: 296: 295: 276: 275: 270: 266: 258: 254: 250: 246: 243: 241: 237: 236: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 181: 178: 177:Find sources: 174: 173: 165: 164:Verifiability 162: 160: 157: 155: 152: 151: 150: 141: 137: 135: 132: 130: 126: 123: 121: 118: 117: 111: 107: 106:Learn to edit 103: 100: 95: 94: 91: 90: 86: 80: 76: 72: 71: 61: 56: 55: 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 4749: 4746: 4743: 4740: 4713:— Preceding 4708: 4706: 4621: 4618: 4591:Protector164 4588: 4580: 4569:edit request 4537: 4502:Kingofaces43 4483: 4482: 4475:Kingofaces43 4454: 4453: 4449: 4434: 4433: 4401: 4400: 4380: 4365: 4364: 4352: 4316: 4315: 4255: 4254: 4238:Kingofaces43 4208: 4207: 4187:Kingofaces43 4162: 4161: 4145:Kingofaces43 4131:Kingofaces43 4099: 4083:Kingofaces43 4024: 4023: 4014: 3999: 3998: 3973: 3972: 3945: 3944: 3928: 3927: 3902: 3901: 3882: 3881: 3864: 3863: 3834: 3833: 3824: 3810:Kingofaces43 3798: 3783: 3782: 3773: 3758: 3757: 3748: 3733: 3732: 3723: 3708: 3707: 3698: 3678:Kingofaces43 3662: 3661: 3638:Kingofaces43 3614: 3598: 3597: 3588: 3557: 3556: 3535: 3534: 3525: 3510: 3509: 3500: 3485: 3484: 3475: 3435: 3434: 3410: 3409: 3390:user:Aircorn 3374: 3373: 3364: 3349: 3348: 3339: 3324: 3323: 3314: 3299: 3298: 3289: 3278: 3263: 3262: 3253: 3238: 3237: 3228: 3213: 3212: 3203: 3188: 3187: 3178: 3163: 3162: 3152: 3137: 3136: 3127: 3112: 3111: 3102: 3087: 3086: 3077: 3061: 3060: 3051: 3036: 3035: 3025: 3010: 3009: 3000: 2969: 2968: 2959: 2944: 2943: 2934: 2919: 2918: 2909: 2899: 2885: 2884: 2875: 2860: 2859: 2850: 2835: 2834: 2825: 2810: 2809: 2796: 2781: 2780: 2759: 2758: 2745: 2729:Kingofaces43 2704:Kingofaces43 2691: 2676: 2675: 2666: 2651: 2650: 2641: 2626: 2625: 2616: 2599: 2588: 2578: 2577: 2564: 2553:Instructions 2460: 2442: 2441: 2397: 2396: 2381:Kingofaces43 2366:Kingofaces43 2351: 2350: 2327:Kingofaces43 2296: 2295: 2279:Kingofaces43 2248: 2247: 2186: 2185: 2123: 2122: 2087: 2086: 2012: 2004: 1985: 1984: 1967:good article 1964: 1939: 1923: 1916: 1887: 1883: 1850:February 24, 1848:. Retrieved 1837: 1828: 1818: 1808:February 24, 1806:. Retrieved 1795: 1785:February 24, 1783:. Retrieved 1773: 1749: 1745: 1732: 1722:February 24, 1720:. Retrieved 1709: 1676: 1673:EMBO Reports 1672: 1662: 1653: 1648:February 24, 1646:. Retrieved 1635: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1607:. Retrieved 1585: 1577: 1558: 1554: 1544: 1534: 1531: 1524:. Retrieved 1514: 1503: 1502: 1495:. Retrieved 1485: 1476: 1469:. Retrieved 1459: 1450: 1443:. Retrieved 1433: 1423: 1413: 1410: 1403:. Retrieved 1393: 1381:. Retrieved 1352: 1339:. Retrieved 1331: 1326: 1319:. Retrieved 1306: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1286: 1267: 1263: 1251: 1245: 1242: 1216: 1207: 1202: 1190: 1186: 1171: 1152: 1148: 1138: 1133: 1124: 1096: 1092: 1082: 1073: 1066:. Retrieved 1056: 1046: 1043: 1024: 1020: 1007: 982: 947:Introduction 946: 931: 913: 844: 804: 755: 715: 650: 592: 507: 483: 425: 371:WikiProjects 354: 264: 238: 225: 219: 211: 204: 198: 192: 186: 176: 148: 73:This is the 52: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 4752:Shantasukra 4719:Shantasukra 4643:David notMD 4615:Hyphenation 3630:first usage 3572:David notMD 2567:transcluded 2471:—Preceding 1679:: 545–548. 1561:: 739–741. 1526:February 8, 1471:February 8, 1383:February 8, 1341:February 8, 1321:February 8, 1155:: 734–742. 1068:February 8, 983:There is a 626:Environment 611:categorized 599:environment 551:Environment 307:not a forum 202:free images 85:not a forum 4793:Categories 4774:Dialectric 4657:MOS:HYPHEN 4573:|answered= 4540:Tryptofish 4079:WP:SUMMARY 2915:Reworded. 2520:Authorship 2506:GA toolbox 2485:Tryptofish 2312:Tryptofish 2264:Tryptofish 2206:Tryptofish 2138:Tryptofish 2103:Tryptofish 2063:Tryptofish 2025:Tryptofish 1892:uninvolved 1884:not change 1616:available. 920:authorized 320:refactored 37:under the 4060:WP:FRINGE 3751:– Where? 3656:WP:Retain 3626:WP:ENGVAR 3234:Flowers. 2579:Reviewer: 2543:Templates 2534:Reviewing 2499:GA Review 2200:whatever. 2117:WP:GMORFC 2001:WP:GMORFC 1609:March 21, 1445:March 19, 1405:March 19, 1232:0738-8551 1099:: 11–20. 995:Citations 887:this edit 731:Sociology 722:sociology 678:Sociology 359:is rated 142:if needed 125:Be polite 75:talk page 4727:contribs 4715:unsigned 4058:or even 4056:WP:UNDUE 3799:nemotode 3076:Heading 2592:contribs 2548:Criteria 2242:criteria 1947:PrimeBOT 1935:Dianerrs 1765:27217243 1701:11463731 1574:12833088 1283:26536836 1239:26767435 1193:: 1–32. 1168:21296423 1121:21546547 1093:Genetics 1040:24041244 1027:: 1–12. 933:approved 395:Genetics 361:GA-class 265:180 days 240:Archives 110:get help 83:This is 81:article. 47:reassess 4661:CWenger 4619:Hello, 4606:MagPlex 4305:better. 2799:plasmid 2473:undated 1693:1083956 1655:points. 1497:May 19, 1219:: 1–5. 1113:3120150 891:history 847:on the 758:on the 653:on the 603:neutral 326:at the 208:WP refs 196:scholar 4770:WP:1RR 4489:(talk) 4460:(talk) 4440:(talk) 4407:(talk) 4371:(talk) 4322:(talk) 4298:issue. 4261:(talk) 4224:WP:DUE 4214:(talk) 4182:WP:DUE 4168:(talk) 4030:(talk) 4020:Done. 4005:(talk) 3979:(talk) 3951:(talk) 3934:(talk) 3908:(talk) 3888:(talk) 3870:(talk) 3840:(talk) 3789:(talk) 3779:Done. 3764:(talk) 3739:(talk) 3714:(talk) 3668:(talk) 3628:, the 3604:(talk) 3563:(talk) 3541:(talk) 3516:(talk) 3491:(talk) 3441:(talk) 3416:(talk) 3380:(talk) 3355:(talk) 3330:(talk) 3320:Done. 3305:(talk) 3269:(talk) 3244:(talk) 3219:(talk) 3194:(talk) 3169:(talk) 3143:(talk) 3118:(talk) 3093:(talk) 3067:(talk) 3042:(talk) 3016:(talk) 2975:(talk) 2950:(talk) 2925:(talk) 2891:(talk) 2866:(talk) 2841:(talk) 2816:(talk) 2787:(talk) 2765:(talk) 2755:Done. 2727:Done. 2682:(talk) 2657:(talk) 2632:(talk) 2448:(talk) 2403:(talk) 2357:(talk) 2302:(talk) 2254:(talk) 2192:(talk) 2129:(talk) 2093:(talk) 2045:Boghog 2013:not OK 2009:Boghog 1991:(talk) 1888:remove 1533:foods. 1204:story. 367:scale. 180:Google 54:Review 4624:(heh) 4577:|ans= 4567:This 3615:color 3259:Okay 3078:Virus 2569:from 2059:WP:AE 2040:added 2003:that 1742:(PDF) 1603:(PDF) 1439:(PDF) 1416:ISAAA 1361:(PDF) 1315:(PDF) 1183:(PDF) 1145:(PDF) 1017:(PDF) 940:in a 885:with 615:Read 587:This 348:This 223:JSTOR 184:books 138:Seek 4778:talk 4756:talk 4723:talk 4691:talk 4655:See 4647:talk 4632:talk 4595:talk 4544:talk 4520:talk 4506:talk 4484:corn 4473:and 4455:corn 4435:corn 4422:talk 4402:corn 4389:talk 4366:corn 4339:talk 4317:corn 4256:corn 4242:talk 4209:corn 4191:talk 4163:corn 4149:talk 4135:talk 4108:talk 4087:talk 4064:this 4025:corn 4000:corn 3974:corn 3946:corn 3929:corn 3903:corn 3883:corn 3865:corn 3835:corn 3814:talk 3784:corn 3759:corn 3734:corn 3709:corn 3682:talk 3663:corn 3642:talk 3599:corn 3576:talk 3558:corn 3536:corn 3511:corn 3486:corn 3454:talk 3436:corn 3411:corn 3398:talk 3375:corn 3350:corn 3325:corn 3300:corn 3264:corn 3239:corn 3214:corn 3189:corn 3164:corn 3138:corn 3113:corn 3088:corn 3062:corn 3037:corn 3011:corn 2988:talk 2970:corn 2945:corn 2920:corn 2886:corn 2861:corn 2836:corn 2811:corn 2782:corn 2760:corn 2748:cell 2733:talk 2708:talk 2677:corn 2652:corn 2627:corn 2607:talk 2586:talk 2489:talk 2467:talk 2443:corn 2398:corn 2385:talk 2370:talk 2352:corn 2331:talk 2316:talk 2297:corn 2283:talk 2268:talk 2249:corn 2210:talk 2187:corn 2170:this 2142:talk 2124:corn 2107:talk 2088:corn 2067:talk 2049:talk 2029:talk 1986:corn 1977:and 1951:talk 1852:2016 1829:Time 1810:2016 1787:2016 1762:PMID 1724:2016 1698:PMID 1650:2016 1611:2016 1571:PMID 1528:2016 1499:2016 1473:2016 1447:2016 1407:2016 1385:2016 1373:ISBN 1343:2016 1323:2016 1280:PMID 1236:PMID 1229:ISSN 1165:PMID 1118:PMID 1070:2016 1037:PMID 918:has 914:The 839:High 605:and 216:FENS 190:news 127:and 4575:or 4481:AIR 4452:AIR 4432:AIR 4399:AIR 4363:AIR 4314:AIR 4309:FA. 4253:AIR 4206:AIR 4160:AIR 4022:AIR 3997:AIR 3971:AIR 3943:AIR 3926:AIR 3900:AIR 3880:AIR 3862:AIR 3832:AIR 3781:AIR 3756:AIR 3731:AIR 3706:AIR 3660:AIR 3596:AIR 3555:AIR 3533:AIR 3508:AIR 3483:AIR 3433:AIR 3408:AIR 3372:AIR 3347:AIR 3322:AIR 3297:AIR 3261:AIR 3236:AIR 3211:AIR 3186:AIR 3161:AIR 3135:AIR 3110:AIR 3085:AIR 3059:AIR 3034:AIR 3008:AIR 2967:AIR 2942:AIR 2917:AIR 2883:AIR 2858:AIR 2833:AIR 2808:AIR 2779:AIR 2757:AIR 2674:AIR 2649:AIR 2624:AIR 2469:) 2440:AIR 2395:AIR 2349:AIR 2294:AIR 2246:AIR 2184:AIR 2121:AIR 2085:AIR 1983:AIR 1945:by 1886:or 1754:doi 1689:PMC 1681:doi 1563:doi 1426:AMA 1365:doi 1272:doi 1253:and 1221:doi 1195:doi 1157:doi 1109:PMC 1101:doi 1097:188 1029:doi 958:on 750:Mid 645:Mid 460:??? 399:MCB 318:or 230:TWL 49:it. 4795:: 4780:) 4758:) 4750:-- 4729:) 4725:• 4693:) 4679:) 4671:• 4649:) 4634:) 4597:) 4581:no 4546:) 4522:) 4508:) 4424:) 4391:) 4341:) 4244:) 4193:) 4151:) 4137:) 4110:) 4089:) 3816:) 3684:) 3644:) 3578:) 3456:) 3400:) 2990:) 2735:) 2710:) 2609:) 2594:) 2491:) 2438:. 2387:) 2372:) 2333:) 2318:) 2285:) 2270:) 2262:-- 2212:) 2144:) 2109:) 2069:) 2051:) 2031:) 1953:) 1937:. 1827:. 1760:. 1750:11 1748:. 1744:. 1696:. 1687:. 1675:. 1671:. 1652:. 1613:. 1597:: 1576:. 1569:. 1559:21 1557:. 1553:. 1530:. 1501:. 1475:. 1449:. 1428:: 1409:. 1371:. 1325:. 1285:. 1278:. 1268:96 1266:. 1262:. 1241:. 1234:. 1227:. 1215:. 1201:. 1191:40 1189:. 1185:. 1170:. 1163:. 1153:37 1151:. 1147:. 1123:. 1116:. 1107:. 1095:. 1091:. 1072:. 1042:. 1035:. 1025:34 1023:. 1019:. 516:). 492:). 397:/ 393:: 263:: 255:, 251:, 247:, 210:) 108:; 63:). 4776:( 4754:( 4721:( 4689:( 4675:@ 4667:^ 4663:( 4645:( 4630:( 4593:( 4542:( 4518:( 4504:( 4477:: 4469:@ 4420:( 4387:( 4337:( 4240:( 4189:( 4147:( 4133:( 4106:( 4085:( 3812:( 3680:( 3640:( 3617:. 3574:( 3452:( 3428:: 3424:@ 3396:( 2986:( 2731:( 2706:( 2605:( 2589:· 2584:( 2487:( 2465:( 2383:( 2368:( 2329:( 2314:( 2281:( 2266:( 2208:( 2163:) 2159:( 2140:( 2105:( 2065:( 2047:( 2027:( 1949:( 1854:. 1831:. 1812:. 1789:. 1767:. 1756:: 1726:. 1703:. 1683:: 1677:2 1565:: 1431:) 1418:) 1387:. 1367:: 1345:. 1291:. 1274:: 1223:: 1197:: 1159:: 1103:: 1031:: 966:. 851:. 762:. 657:. 623:. 613:. 468:. 373:. 330:. 257:4 253:3 249:2 245:1 242:: 226:· 220:· 212:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 182:( 112:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index