669:- update the reference list on the Knowledge (XXG) page a little - mention the forum situation and the Facebook page on the Wiki. (Some people, myself among them, simply won't consider Facebook as the venue for a serious forum, and wouldn't use Facebook in any event unless explicitly directed there.) - mention the problem with Java-8 on the Wiki. (People who download Gephi nowadays will be running Java-8 and may well conclude that Gephi went the way of many abandoned OSS projects when it fails to run (without any error message !) after installing.) - have somebody fix the website to allow people to register. (if there's one red flag signalling an abandoned project it's that their website is no longer maintained). -
454:- I downloaded Gephi from its website, installed it under Windows 7, didn't work (the installation went Ok, but Gephi didn't come up after starting it). Some Googling later I found that others had this problem too (their posts were dated 2014) and that they had a workaround: installing Java 7, and feeding Gephi the path to the JRE version 7. That worked for me too, but it's now my 2015 and it still doesn't work with Java 8. How active is this project? - I saw on its forum that other people had reported the same problem (in 2015). I tried to register on the forum an join the discussion, but on trying to register I got an automated response that my IP addres was blacklisted. Fortunately a link was included to the site that maintains the blacklist (
176:
653:- citations from a year ago aren't evidence of current activity, and all but one of the references mentioned on Knowledge (XXG) are from 2011, the exception being a French-language article (not the best possible reference on an international forum) from 2014. However I'm happy to accept that there is strong and continued interest in Gephi and that it's being used intensively. - the last version of the Gephi toolkit Gephi 0.8.2beta (Jan 03 2013)) on
84:
53:
152:
22:
473:--For those who are using the old 'tor.ahbl.org' list - you've been using a DNSbl list which has been shut down for around FOUR YEARS. You should be checking to verify that the lists you use are still working or not. I removed the test entry of '2.0.0.127.tor.ahbl.org' years ago, which your monitoring systems should have noticed and warned you about.
256:
It's prevalence in research and journalism as well as its GSoC selection the last three years running seem to be substantive differences from the other articles currently on the speedy deletion list as well as the last iteration of this article, which I wasn't around to discuss or I would have made a
212:
I know this was up in an earlier version and deleted, but I do think Gephi is notable enough for its own
Knowledge (XXG) page. I've run into the same problem with its beta designation as was discussed in the previous CfD, and so I thought I'd start this page and see what kind of hammer comes down on
270:
mention the software being used. That's one of the reasons why I put a link to papers using Gephi and pointed out the references by hand. I'm not trying to gum up the works, but I think there's more than enough of a difference in this article as well as the adoption of the software package since
292:
and it took place in March 2010 and referred to a lack of references. If you'll take a look at the various references I've posted, you'll notice in the 20 months since then that Gephi has seen significantly more adoption among data visualization practitioners. It's also the technology behind
467:--If you are still using these services, this may cause you to incorrectly tag e-mail as spam, or create other unintended consequences. Fix and maintain your servers, now. Do not contact us about 'removing' your domain or IP address from our lists, as there is nothing we can do for you.
410:
Hi, I'm the author of the previous version, rejected 20 months ago, so I'm following the discussions here with interest. I'm very surprised that despite more than 60 citations in research papers, journals and books, one can still consider a lack of trusted sources. To verify, go to
308:
Where are the references that talk about it in a substantive manner? Of the 6 refs in the article only two actually mention it and one of those is its own website. The existence of other articles that do not meet the notability criteria is no reason to create another - see
662:
has 2014 as the date of the most recent post and no solution to the problem except to downgrade to Java-7. Sorry, but that's one of the hallmarks of a dead project. - I note that the website URL given on the Wiki page points to the right (live) website
327:
The article isn't perfect (it needs a lead and a few more words) but two references are enough to prevent a speedy deletion in my opinion. Notability is not a speedy deletion criteria, and the article is sufficiently different so it doesn't meet CSD G4.
657:
dates from 2013; there seem to have been no updates after that. So it looks as if development has stopped in
January 2013. - the forum page I found when looking for a solution to the Java-8 problem (and where I found you as a user) under
261:
or, I suppose more importantly, what would make it "notable enough" besides being used in
Research 1 institutions and journalism? For one thing, I don't know why you would expect the articles to reference the software--hardly any article that uses
464:--As promised in April, on Jan 1st, 2015, i'll be wildcarding all zones no longer in operation - this includes rhsbl.ahbl.org, dnsbl.ahbl.org, and ircbl.ahbl.org. This means that these services will return positive responses for any queries.
845:
185:
67:
390:
6 references should be enough too keep this article, but the main reason cited in the previous AfD doesn't make any sense to me. Gephi is very influential in visualizing networks and used by researchers worldwide.
367:
This page should not be speedily deleted because there are significant differences in the maturity and adoption of the Gephi platform since the first iteration of this article was added to
Knowledge (XXG) in March
342:
I should say 5 - I actually took the time and looked and 4 of the references mention gephi, one of the articles that doesn't mention it explicitly the author created the visualizations (so he would know!).
840:
190:
835:
825:
470:--The query load is still high enough that I can not justify allocating the resources necessary to support queries from people who refuse to properly maintain their mail servers.
850:
787:
This page should not be speedily deleted because this software is in use by a large number of researchers and is in active development. It is definitely not ”fan cruft”. --
574:
729:
725:
711:
521:- The forum has not moved and this feels. The Gephi group on Facebook has largely taken over as the place for Q&A's about Gephi, with 2,589 members as of today:
142:
810:
518:- Most of the Gephi platform (website and wiki) have been migrated to github.io in 2015 to enhance maintability (gephi.org redirects to gephi.github.io)
502:- The paper declaring the creation of Gephi is itself cited 1,154 times, which is a tall order in terms of citations, and the citation trend is upward:
132:
820:
166:
805:
108:
815:
508:- Two books by Packt publisher have been published about Gephi by Ken Cherven, independently of the Gephi team and of the Gephi Consortium:
417:
Considering the
Notability issue, Gephi won the Oracle award "Duke's Choice" in 2010 for extreme innovation in technical data visualization:
575:
https://scholar.google.fr/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=fEDLILQAAAAJ&citation_for_view=fEDLILQAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C
242:
Without adding anything substantive to the article why would it not be speedy deleted? Most of the references do not even mention it.
91:
58:
707:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
161:
63:
227:
Oh, and full disclosure, I use Gephi a lot, and I wrote a plugin for it and I'm one of the authors on one of the cited articles.
855:
563:
33:
830:
610:
310:
772:
697:
505:- Gephi is routinely recommended as a solution for network analysis and visual exploration of networks. See eg or
418:
728:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
175:
39:
21:
763:
689:
552:
257:
case for it's inclusion, which is what I'm doing now. Can you tell me what would differentiate this from
104:
747:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
735:
478:- clearly the Gephi forum admin hasn't paid attention to the blacklist-filter for at least four months.
373:
298:
276:
232:
218:
107:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
688:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
586:
436:
396:
348:
333:
428:
530:
732:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
748:
432:
392:
344:
329:
289:
788:
369:
294:
272:
263:
258:
228:
214:
755:
564:
https://scholar.google.fr/scholar?hl=en&q=gephi&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=
537:. I am a member of the Gephi Community support team and a member of the Gephi Consortium.
496:
Discovering this discussion page today, may I add some comments on the issues discussed:
714:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
754:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
721:
621:
611:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=gephi
799:
526:
318:
247:
698:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111121213306/https://gephi.org/2011/happy-new-year/
599:
151:
83:
52:
720:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
419:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/dukeschoicewinners-171159.html
659:
412:
455:
100:
654:
701:
632:
314:
243:
96:
553:
https://gephi.wordpress.com/2015/02/25/gephi-is-asleep-and-up-to-awaken/
267:
846:
Start-Class Free and open-source software articles of Low-importance
647:
Good to hear from someone involved in Gephi, so it's not dead then.
681:
271:
the last version of this article to warrant its not being deleted.
587:
http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-111866146X.html
481:
Taken together I'm asking myself if this project is still alive.
492:
This could be reflected in the
Knowledge (XXG) entry for Gephi?
499:- Gephi is now mentioned in ~ 4,340 papers in Google Scholar:
489:
This blog post from Feb. 25, 2015 gives the update on Gephi:
15:
485:
Comment on "Is this project still alive?" and additional info
293:
LinkedIn's inMaps, which I'd forgotten to add to the article.
174:
150:
791:
777:
534:
440:
400:
377:
352:
337:
322:
302:
280:
251:
236:
222:
692:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
423:
Hope that help to put a potential deletion in context...
685:
841:
Low-importance Free and open-source software articles
451:
I had the following experiences today (May 9, 2015):
95:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
724:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
622:
https://twitter.com/Gephi/status/590440449460019201
836:Start-Class Free and open-source software articles
598:Katy Borner (2014) Visual Insights at MIT Press:
511:- Gephi's latest version (0.8.2) has passed the
461:-- Last Notice: Wildcarding of Services Jan 1st
826:Start-Class software articles of Low-importance
710:This message was posted before February 2018.
600:http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/visual-insights
431:any editor can remove the template so I did.
8:
19:
851:All Free and open-source software articles
680:I have just modified one external link on
660:https://forum.gephi.org/viewforum.php?f=32
47:
456:http://www.ahbl.org/lktool?lookup=x.y.z.n
413:http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gephi
655:https://github.com/gephi/gephi/Releases
545:
49:
702:https://gephi.org/2011/happy-new-year/
633:https://www.facebook.com/groups/gephi/
117:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
89:This article is within the scope of
585:John W. Foreman (2013) Data Smart (
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
811:Low-importance Computing articles
684:. Please take a moment to review
821:Low-importance software articles
82:
51:
20:
137:This article has been rated as
806:Start-Class Computing articles
120:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
816:Start-Class software articles
441:19:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
427:That's 3 votes for keep; per
401:13:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
378:02:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
353:14:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
338:13:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
323:09:32, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
303:02:36, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
281:02:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
252:01:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
237:19:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
223:19:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
186:Free and open-source software
183:This article is supported by
159:This article is supported by
111:and see a list of open tasks.
68:Free and open-source software
778:17:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
447:Is this project still alive?
290:original deletion discussion
288:I went back and checked the
872:
741:(last update: 5 June 2024)
677:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
666:So my suggestions are to:
143:project's importance scale
792:17:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
182:
158:
136:
77:
46:
535:20:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
673:External links modified
856:All Computing articles
179:
155:
105:information technology
28:This article is rated
831:All Software articles
458:), where I got this:
178:
154:
92:WikiProject Computing
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
722:regular verification
162:WikiProject Software
712:After February 2018
643:Response to comment
513:1 million downloads
311:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
783:Contested deletion
766:InternetArchiveBot
717:InternetArchiveBot
406:Contested deletion
383:Contested deletion
363:Contested deletion
180:
156:
123:Computing articles
34:content assessment
742:
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
863:
776:
767:
740:
739:
718:
635:
630:
624:
619:
613:
608:
602:
596:
590:
583:
577:
572:
566:
561:
555:
550:
515:in April 2015:
259:Tulip (software)
125:
124:
121:
118:
115:
86:
79:
78:
73:
70:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
871:
870:
866:
865:
864:
862:
861:
860:
796:
795:
785:
770:
765:
733:
726:have permission
716:
690:this simple FaQ
675:
670:
664:
645:
640:
639:
638:
631:
627:
620:
616:
609:
605:
597:
593:
584:
580:
573:
569:
562:
558:
551:
547:
487:
479:
459:
449:
408:
385:
365:
210:
122:
119:
116:
113:
112:
71:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
869:
867:
859:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
808:
798:
797:
784:
781:
760:
759:
752:
705:
704:
696:Added archive
674:
671:
668:
652:
644:
641:
637:
636:
625:
614:
603:
591:
578:
567:
556:
544:
543:
539:
524:
495:
486:
483:
477:
453:
448:
445:
444:
443:
407:
404:
384:
381:
364:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
286:
285:
284:
283:
209:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
195:
194:
191:Low-importance
181:
171:
170:
167:Low-importance
157:
147:
146:
139:Low-importance
135:
129:
128:
126:
109:the discussion
87:
75:
74:
72:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
868:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
803:
801:
794:
793:
790:
789:Andy Anderson
782:
780:
779:
774:
769:
768:
757:
753:
750:
746:
745:
744:
737:
731:
727:
723:
719:
713:
708:
703:
699:
695:
694:
693:
691:
687:
683:
678:
672:
667:
661:
656:
651:
650:However ...
648:
642:
634:
629:
626:
623:
618:
615:
612:
607:
604:
601:
595:
592:
588:
582:
579:
576:
571:
568:
565:
560:
557:
554:
549:
546:
542:
538:
536:
532:
528:
522:
519:
516:
514:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
493:
490:
484:
482:
476:
475:
471:
468:
465:
462:
457:
452:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
421:
420:
415:
414:
405:
403:
402:
398:
394:
389:
382:
380:
379:
375:
371:
362:
354:
350:
346:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
291:
282:
278:
274:
269:
265:
260:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
225:
224:
220:
216:
207:
192:
189:(assessed as
188:
187:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:(assessed as
164:
163:
153:
149:
148:
144:
140:
134:
131:
130:
127:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
786:
764:
761:
736:source check
715:
709:
706:
679:
676:
665:
649:
646:
628:
617:
606:
594:
581:
570:
559:
548:
540:
523:
520:
517:
512:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
494:
491:
488:
480:
474:
472:
469:
466:
463:
460:
450:
422:
416:
409:
387:
386:
366:
287:
226:
211:
184:
160:
138:
90:
40:WikiProjects
370:Elijahmeeks
295:Elijahmeeks
273:Elijahmeeks
229:Elijahmeeks
215:Elijahmeeks
30:Start-class
800:Categories
773:Report bug
541:References
756:this tool
749:this tool
429:WP:SPEEDY
114:Computing
101:computing
97:computers
59:Computing
762:Cheers.—
527:Seinecle
64:Software
686:my edit
264:Tableau
208:DELETED
141:on the
268:ArcMap
103:, and
36:scale.
682:Gephi
525:I am
368:2010.
531:talk
437:talk
433:Kirk
397:talk
393:Kirk
388:Keep
374:talk
349:talk
345:Kirk
334:talk
330:Kirk
319:talk
299:talk
277:talk
248:talk
233:talk
219:talk
213:me.
730:RfC
700:to
315:noq
266:or
244:noq
133:Low
802::
743:.
738:}}
734:{{
533:)
439:)
399:)
376:)
351:)
336:)
321:)
313:.
301:)
279:)
250:)
235:)
221:)
193:).
169:).
99:,
66:/
62::
775:)
771:(
758:.
751:.
589:)
529:(
435:(
395:(
372:(
347:(
332:(
317:(
297:(
275:(
246:(
231:(
217:(
145:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
